Growth of ethnic minorities 'could undermine English identity'

First topic message reminder :

Almost one in three people in Britain will be from an ethnic minority within a generation, a report suggests.

Non-white people will make up between 20 and 30 per cent of the population by 2050, Policy Exchange says. The current share is around 14 per cent.

The report could also raise questions about the future of the English national identity, which it found is primarily adopted by white people. The think tank, which has close links to the Conservative Party leadership, also highlights differences in the political leanings of different ethnic groups, advising politicians not to treat minority voters as a bloc.

The expected growth in the non-white population is largely attributed to a higher birth rate among ethnic minority Britons. A quarter of children aged under 10 in the UK are from ethnic minorities. By contrast, 95 per cent of people aged over 60 are white.

Over the past decade, the white population has remained roughly the same while the minority population has almost doubled, accounting for 80 per cent of population growth, it adds.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/immigration/10809481/Non-white-people-almost-30-per-cent-of-population-by-2050.html

Funny, I'm sure I remember reading a couple of years back that the percentage of minorities would be 25% at most by 2050. Looks like the figures are changing every year. Even taking these figures and the difference in birth rates, it would appear that it's the indigenous English who'll be in the minority in the not too distant future.

Shady wrote:

Tommy Monk wrote:http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-27263790
Coming soon to a town near you..... and your town too!
I'm glad you lefties are So happy celebrating the 'diversity' or should that be celebrating the absence of white British......?!

Good afternoon Tommy.

The left wing racists go round in circles doing their best to avoid the truth.But that's what we must expect from bigots.

Another far right supporter clueless on politics or how I fail to see that diversity is now racist, odd one that.

BigAndy9 wrote:

Didge wrote:

In School you did not own anything did you, did you share what you used at school?

So no not stealing, borrowing, you do not own this country either, yet seem to think you can decide who can and cannot come here, rather odd that and even worse surely condemned (which I do not as they like others have a right to a new life) the 6 million ex-pats who moved abroad?

No, he does what every other person in the world does - votes.

If people believed we could get rid of foreigners we'd be bunking them off down town.

It is in fact them bunking the English whites off!

Aww xx

Spindleshanks wrote:From that BBC link

Children from Iraq, the Philippines, Somalia, India, Nepal, Cyprus, Romania and Slovakia, to name but a few, mingle happily and play together.

Mingle happily.  Shame we don't seem to be able to follow that example in this country isn't it?

This must be the racism shady is speaking of where kids get on with each other no matter their ethnic background?

Odd that one, I never knew racism meant getting along with others

Didge wrote:

Spindleshanks wrote:From that BBC link

Children from Iraq, the Philippines, Somalia, India, Nepal, Cyprus, Romania and Slovakia, to name but a few, mingle happily and play together.

Mingle happily.  Shame we don't seem to be able to follow that example in this country isn't it?

This must be the racism shady is speaking of where kids get on with each other no matter their ethnic background?

Odd that one, I never knew racism meant getting along with others

Reckon they could show the adult a thing or two   

Didge wrote:

BigAndy9 wrote:


No, he does what every other person in the world does - votes.

If people believed we could get rid of foreigners we'd be bunking them off down town.

It is in fact them bunking the English whites off!

That did not answer my question and now do you speak for Matti, interesting, are you Matti/tommy?

Ha ha Ha ha

Yes people do vote, so if they vote and UKIP do not win a general election, you respect the electorate then do you Andy Pandy?

Well i have done for the past 39 years, and so have the rest of the silent majority.

It's them foreigners and scroungers who do all the rioting, killing, mugging, isn't it!

Spindleshanks wrote:

Didge wrote:


This must be the racism shady is speaking of where kids get on with each other no matter their ethnic background?

Odd that one, I never knew racism meant getting along with others

Reckon they could show the adult a thing or two   

Indeed, especially a couple of posters on here.

 ::D:: 


Enjoy and off to have dinner

And they would be quite happily playing with kids in their own countries if they had stayed there.
We don't want or need any more immigrants.
Why can't they stay where they are or go elsewhere?

Spindleshanks wrote:From that BBC link

Children from Iraq, the Philippines, Somalia, India, Nepal, Cyprus, Romania and Slovakia, to name but a few, mingle happily and play together.

Mingle happily.  Shame we don't seem to be able to follow that example in this country isn't it?

We've been doing it here for centuries.It's nothing new.

Tommy Monk wrote:And they would be quite happily playing with kids in their own countries if they had stayed there.
We don't want or need any more immigrants.
Why can't they stay where they are or go elsewhere?

Yes they could, the point is though that they are here and showing us how integration really should work.

It's not about people coming here and falling into line, it's about everyone accepting others for who they are.

Didge wrote:

Tommy Monk wrote:Did my parents tell me to 'share'what is not mine?
Do you mean stealing?

In School you did not own anything did you, did you share what you used at school?
So no not stealing, borrowing, you do not own this country either, yet seem to think you can decide who can and cannot come here, rather odd that and even worse surely you condemn (which I do not as they like others have a right to a new life) the 6 million ex-pats who moved abroad?

In school we all owned everything as it was paid for by our parents and their parents in taxes.
When you borrow something you are supposed to give it back. OTherwise it is stealing.
Yes we can and decide who comes here or not and we need to tighten up the controls considerably.
A scattering of 6 million people from here all over the world is different to huge swathes of The world wanting to arrive here.
WE have enough immigrants here now, some would say too many!
WE don't want or need any more, and we never voted for the ones we have already had put on us.

Spindleshanks wrote:

Tommy Monk wrote:And they would be quite happily playing with kids in their own countries if they had stayed there.
We don't want or need any more immigrants.
Why can't they stay where they are or go elsewhere?

Yes they could, the point is though that they are here and showing us how integration really should work.

It's not about people coming here and falling into line, it's about everyone accepting others for who they are.

Intregration was working here fine & has been for centuries......Didn't you know that as we all did?

I keep trying to tell you.....it's invasion that we can't stomach.

Have a chat with Didge & he'll clue you in on how we Brits have been multicultural for a long long time.

White people only make up about 30 percent of the world population anyway. Even if ethnic minorities do eventually make up 30 percent of the U.K. population, it will still be vastly majority white.

Nobody thinks of the U.S. as a non-white country, where white people make up about 72 percent of the population ...

Why do they all want to come here..............

Ask the Afghan.....

" An Afghan migrant who was trying to sail to Britain in a raft made of six planks of wood and a sheet has been rescued from the English Channel.

The 23-year-old was soaked to the skin and suffering from hypothermia when he was picked up by coastguards after he was spotted drifting near to Sangatte.

He told them that his ‘dream’ was to ‘travel to England to start a new life’ and would stop at nothing to get there.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2621425/French-coast-guard-rescue-Afghan-trying-sail-Channel-raft-six-planks-wood-bedsheet.html

gerber wrote:Why do they all want to come here..............

Ask the Afghan.....

" An Afghan migrant who was trying to sail to Britain in a raft made of six planks of wood and a sheet has been rescued from the English Channel.

The 23-year-old was soaked to the skin and suffering from hypothermia when he was picked up by coastguards after he was spotted drifting near to Sangatte.

He told them that his ‘dream’ was to ‘travel to England to start a new life’ and would stop at nothing to get there.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2621425/French-coast-guard-rescue-Afghan-trying-sail-Channel-raft-six-planks-wood-bedsheet.html

And once he is here, and he will get here - he will stop at nothing to stay here!

Rape, murder - better your children than him.

Shady wrote:

Spindleshanks wrote:

Yes they could, the point is though that they are here and showing us how integration really should work.

It's not about people coming here and falling into line, it's about everyone accepting others for who they are.

Intregration was working here fine & has been for centuries......Didn't you know that as we all did?

I keep trying to tell you.....it's invasion that we can't stomach.

Have a chat with Didge & he'll clue you in on how we Brits have been multicultural for a long long time.

What invasion?

BigAndy9 wrote:

Didge wrote:


That did not answer my question and now do you speak for Matti, interesting, are you Matti/tommy?

Ha ha Ha ha

Yes people do vote, so if they vote and UKIP do not win a general election, you respect the electorate then do you Andy Pandy?

Well i have done for the past 39 years, and so have the rest of the silent majority.

It's them foreigners and scroungers who do all the rioting, killing, mugging, isn't it!

An' before them, the goddam normans, an' saxons and them pesky britons. Never changes does it?

Just because the world is 30% white, doesn't mean we have to start trying to emulate that here in UK.



We don't want or need any more immigrants.


And It is up to us who we allow to come in to our country.

Didge wrote:

Tommy Monk wrote:http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-27263790
Coming soon to a town near you..... and your town too!
I'm glad you lefties are So happy celebrating the 'diversity' or should that be celebrating the absence of white British......?!

That is what I call excellent and a great way for many different ethnic and British children to learn each others languages and cultures, what an excellent idea

yeah...they spend SOO much time learning THAT...that they have insufficient time to learn USEFUL things...like maths science and such....

victorisnotamused wrote:

Didge wrote:


That is what I call excellent and a great way for many different ethnic and British children to learn each others languages and cultures, what an excellent idea

yeah...they spend SOO much time learning THAT...that they have insufficient time to learn USEFUL things...like maths science and such....

You can lead a horse to water   

what does that idiotic comment mean then??

gawd folks its another dodgy didge clone.....
speaks in riddles

What is also found in schools with high immigrants is that teachers spend so much time dealing with them that the white British are neglected.



It's great this diversity thing isn't it?

Tommy Monk wrote:

Didge wrote:
In School you did not own anything did you, did you share what you used at school?
So no not stealing, borrowing, you do not own this country either, yet seem to think you can decide who can and cannot come here, rather odd that and even worse surely you condemn (which I do not as they like others have a right to a new life) the 6 million ex-pats who moved abroad?

In school we all owned everything as it was paid for by our parents and their parents in taxes.
When you borrow something you are supposed to give it back. OTherwise it is stealing.
Yes we can and decide who comes here or not and we need to tighten up the controls considerably.
A scattering of 6 million people from here all over the world is different to huge swathes of The world wanting to arrive here.
WE have enough immigrants here now, some would say too many!
WE don't want or need any more, and we never voted for the ones we have already had put on us.

A scattering?

 ://?roflmao?/: ://?roflmao?/: ://?roflmao?/: 

Again look at Spain, nearly one million Brits, in Australia, over one million Brits, you do end up always with egg on your face.
Again our parents teach us to share not only what is ours but what is not ours, you advocate against what parents teach, which is also amusing,

Tommy Monk wrote:What is also found in schools with high immigrants is that teachers spend so much time dealing with them that the white British are neglected.



It's great this diversity thing isn't it?

I have witnessed that first hand.

victorisnotamused wrote:

Didge wrote:


That is what I call excellent and a great way for many different ethnic and British children to learn each others languages and cultures, what an excellent idea

yeah...they spend SOO much time learning THAT...that they have insufficient time to learn USEFUL things...like maths science and such....

 ://?roflmao?/: ://?roflmao?/: ://?roflmao?/: ://?roflmao?/: 

Really so you are saying they will not get time to learn anything but how to communicate.

So funny it deserves the mocking.

Tesstacious wrote: Almost one in three people in Britain will be from an ethnic minority within a generation, a report suggests.

Non-white people will make up between 20 and 30 per cent of the population by 2050, Policy Exchange says. The current share is around 14 per cent.

The report could also raise questions about the future of the English national identity, which it found is primarily adopted by white people. The think tank, which has close links to the Conservative Party leadership, also highlights differences in the political leanings of different ethnic groups, advising politicians not to treat minority voters as a bloc.

The expected growth in the non-white population is largely attributed to a higher birth rate among ethnic minority Britons. A quarter of children aged under 10 in the UK are from ethnic minorities. By contrast, 95 per cent of people aged over 60 are white.

Over the past decade, the white population has remained roughly the same while the minority population has almost doubled, accounting for 80 per cent of population growth, it adds.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/immigration/10809481/Non-white-people-almost-30-per-cent-of-population-by-2050.html

Funny, I'm sure I remember reading a couple of years back that the percentage of minorities would be 25% at most by 2050.  Looks like the figures are changing every year.  Even taking these figures and the difference in birth rates, it would appear that it's the indigenous English who'll be in the minority in the not too distant future.

Islam is not a religion nor is it a cult. It is a complete system.

Islam has religious, legal, political, economic and military components. The religious component is a beard for all the other components.

Islamization occurs when there are sufficient Muslims in a country to agitate for their so-called ‘religious rights.’

When politically correct and culturally diverse societies agree to ‘the reasonable’ Muslim demands for their ‘religious rights,’ they also get the other components under the table. Here’s how it works (percentages source CIA: The World Fact Book (2007)).

As long as the Muslim population remains around 1% of any given country they will be regarded as a peace-loving minority and not as a threat to anyone. In fact, they may be featured in articles and films, stereotyped for their colorful uniqueness:


United States — Muslim 1.0%
Australia — Muslim 1.5%
Canada — Muslim 1.9%
China — Muslim 1%-2%
Italy — Muslim 1.5%
Norway — Muslim 1.8%

At 2% and 3% they begin to proselytize from other ethnic minorities and disaffected groups with major recruiting from the jails and among street gangs:

Denmark — Muslim 2%
Germany — Muslim 3.7%
United Kingdom — Muslim 2.7%
Spain — Muslim 4%
Thailand — Muslim 4.6%

From 5% on they exercise an inordinate influence in proportion to their percentage of the population.

They will push for the introduction of halal (clean by Islamic standards) food, thereby securing food preparation jobs for Muslims. They will increase pressure on supermarket chains to feature it on their shelves — along with threats for failure to comply. ( United States ).

France — Muslim 8%
Philippines — Muslim 5%
Sweden — Muslim 5%
Switzerland — Muslim 4.3%
The Netherlands — Muslim 5.5%
Trinidad &Tobago — Muslim 5.8%

At this point, they will work to get the ruling government to allow them to rule themselves under Sharia, the Islamic Law. The ultimate goal of Islam is not to convert the world but to establish Sharia law over the entire world.

When Muslims reach 10% of the population, they will increase lawlessness as a means of complaint about their conditions ( Paris –car-burnings). Any non-Muslim action that offends Islam will result in uprisings and threats ( Amsterdam – Mohammed cartoons).

Guyana — Muslim 10%
India — Muslim 13.4%
Israel — Muslim 16%
Kenya — Muslim 10%
Russia — Muslim 10-15%

After reaching 20% expect hair-trigger rioting, jihad militia formations, sporadic killings and church and synagogue burning:
Ethiopia — Muslim 32.8%

At 40% you will find widespread massacres, chronic terror attacks and ongoing militia warfare:

Bosnia — Muslim 40%
Chad — Muslim 53.1%
Lebanon — Muslim 59.7%

From 60% you may expect unfettered persecution of non-believers and other religions, sporadic ethnic cleansing (genocide), use of Sharia Law as a weapon and Jizya, the tax placed on infidels:

Albania — Muslim 70%
Malaysia — Muslim 60.4%
Qatar — Muslim 77.5%
Sudan — Muslim 70%

After 80% expect State run ethnic cleansing and genocide:

Bangladesh — Muslim 83%
Egypt — Muslim 90%
Gaza — Muslim 98.7%
Indonesia — Muslim 86.1%
Iran — Muslim 98%
Iraq — Muslim 97%
Jordan — Muslim 92%
Morocco — Muslim 98.7%
Pakistan — Muslim 97%
Palestine — Muslim 99%
Syria — Muslim 90%
Tajikistan — Muslim 90%
Turkey — Muslim 99.8%
United Arab Emirates — Muslim 96%

100% will usher in the peace of ‘Dar-es-Salaam’ — the Islamic House of Peace — there’s supposed to be peace because everybody is a Muslim:

Afghanistan — Muslim 100%
Saudi Arabia — Muslim 100%
Somalia — Muslim 100%
Yemen — Muslim 99.9%

Of course, that’s not the case. To satisfy their blood lust, Muslims then start killing each other for a variety of reasons.

Tommy Monk wrote:What is also found in schools with high immigrants is that teachers spend so much time dealing with them that the white British are neglected.



It's great this diversity thing isn't it?

That is not really correct though, it has been found that some white British kids from poor backgrounds have been, that is a failing which needs to be addressed, but is not the fault of the immigrants but of some teachers and the system, so again a poor utterly absurd argument, because another failing here is also laid upon the parents of those children

smelly_bandit wrote:

Tesstacious wrote: Almost one in three people in Britain will be from an ethnic minority within a generation, a report suggests.

Non-white people will make up between 20 and 30 per cent of the population by 2050, Policy Exchange says. The current share is around 14 per cent.

The report could also raise questions about the future of the English national identity, which it found is primarily adopted by white people. The think tank, which has close links to the Conservative Party leadership, also highlights differences in the political leanings of different ethnic groups, advising politicians not to treat minority voters as a bloc.

The expected growth in the non-white population is largely attributed to a higher birth rate among ethnic minority Britons. A quarter of children aged under 10 in the UK are from ethnic minorities. By contrast, 95 per cent of people aged over 60 are white.

Over the past decade, the white population has remained roughly the same while the minority population has almost doubled, accounting for 80 per cent of population growth, it adds.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/immigration/10809481/Non-white-people-almost-30-per-cent-of-population-by-2050.html

Funny, I'm sure I remember reading a couple of years back that the percentage of minorities would be 25% at most by 2050.  Looks like the figures are changing every year.  Even taking these figures and the difference in birth rates, it would appear that it's the indigenous English who'll be in the minority in the not too distant future.

Islam is not a religion nor is it a cult. It is a complete system.

Islam has religious, legal, political, economic and military components. The religious component is a beard for all the other components.

Islamization occurs when there are sufficient Muslims in a country to agitate for their so-called ‘religious rights.’

When politically correct and culturally diverse societies agree to ‘the reasonable’ Muslim demands for their ‘religious rights,’ they also get the other components under the table. Here’s how it works (percentages source CIA: The World Fact Book (2007)).

As long as the Muslim population remains around 1% of any given country they will be regarded as a peace-loving minority and not as a threat to anyone. In fact, they may be featured in articles and films, stereotyped for their colorful uniqueness:


United States — Muslim 1.0%
Australia — Muslim 1.5%
Canada — Muslim 1.9%
China — Muslim 1%-2%
Italy — Muslim 1.5%
Norway — Muslim 1.8%

At 2% and 3% they begin to proselytize from other ethnic minorities and disaffected groups with major recruiting from the jails and among street gangs:

Denmark — Muslim 2%
Germany — Muslim 3.7%
United Kingdom — Muslim 2.7%
Spain — Muslim 4%
Thailand — Muslim 4.6%

From 5% on they exercise an inordinate influence in proportion to their percentage of the population.

They will push for the introduction of halal (clean by Islamic standards) food, thereby securing food preparation jobs for Muslims. They will increase pressure on supermarket chains to feature it on their shelves — along with threats for failure to comply. ( United States ).

France — Muslim 8%
Philippines — Muslim 5%
Sweden — Muslim 5%
Switzerland — Muslim 4.3%
The Netherlands — Muslim 5.5%
Trinidad &Tobago — Muslim 5.8%

At this point, they will work to get the ruling government to allow them to rule themselves under Sharia, the Islamic Law. The ultimate goal of Islam is not to convert the world but to establish Sharia law over the entire world.

When Muslims reach 10% of the population, they will increase lawlessness as a means of complaint about their conditions ( Paris –car-burnings). Any non-Muslim action that offends Islam will result in uprisings and threats ( Amsterdam – Mohammed cartoons).

Guyana — Muslim 10%
India — Muslim 13.4%
Israel — Muslim 16%
Kenya — Muslim 10%
Russia — Muslim 10-15%

After reaching 20% expect hair-trigger rioting, jihad militia formations, sporadic killings and church and synagogue burning:
Ethiopia — Muslim 32.8%

At 40% you will find widespread massacres, chronic terror attacks and ongoing militia warfare:

Bosnia — Muslim 40%
Chad — Muslim 53.1%
Lebanon — Muslim 59.7%

From 60% you may expect unfettered persecution of non-believers and other religions, sporadic ethnic cleansing (genocide), use of Sharia Law as a weapon and Jizya, the tax placed on infidels:

Albania — Muslim 70%
Malaysia — Muslim 60.4%
Qatar — Muslim 77.5%
Sudan — Muslim 70%

After 80% expect State run ethnic cleansing and genocide:

Bangladesh — Muslim 83%
Egypt — Muslim 90%
Gaza — Muslim 98.7%
Indonesia — Muslim 86.1%
Iran — Muslim 98%
Iraq — Muslim 97%
Jordan — Muslim 92%
Morocco — Muslim 98.7%
Pakistan — Muslim 97%
Palestine — Muslim 99%
Syria — Muslim 90%
Tajikistan — Muslim 90%
Turkey — Muslim 99.8%
United Arab Emirates — Muslim 96%

100% will usher in the peace of ‘Dar-es-Salaam’ — the Islamic House of Peace — there’s supposed to be peace because everybody is a Muslim:

Afghanistan — Muslim 100%
Saudi Arabia — Muslim 100%
Somalia — Muslim 100%
Yemen — Muslim 99.9%

Of course, that’s not the case. To satisfy their blood lust, Muslims then start killing each other for a variety of reasons.

 ://?roflmao?/: ://?roflmao?/: ://?roflmao?/: ://?roflmao?/: ://?roflmao?/: 



So now religion, oh my poor smelly, how did Australia, Americas, Africa countries etc all become Christian nations, by handing out flowers?

Spindleshanks wrote:

Shady wrote:

Spindleshanks wrote:

Yes they could, the point is though that they are here and showing us how integration really should work.

It's not about people coming here and falling into line, it's about everyone accepting others for who they are.

Intregration was working here fine & has been for centuries......Didn't you know that as we all did?

I keep trying to tell you.....it's invasion that we can't stomach.

Have a chat with Didge & he'll clue you in on how we Brits have been multicultural for a long long time.

What invasion?

Scaredy-cats always call higher immigration an "invasion," as though they're landing warships on our beaches and moving armed soldiers through the countryside.

It makes them feel all special.

victorisnotamused wrote:what does that idiotic comment mean then??

gawd folks its another dodgy didge clone.....
speaks in riddles

Bless you still upset Grand daddy, mate you prove what prejudice people are like, bitter, twisted and not able to live along side others, this shows who the real problem is, people like yourself.
It is the young in the majority that are growing up without prejudice, because they have grown up around many cultures, which shows what a benefit it is to be

Spain welcomes wealthy retired British with open arms.
And Australia is in need of skilled workers from here.
There are also plenty of Spanish and Australiano here too.
We don't want or need any more immigrants.

Ben_Reilly wrote:

Spindleshanks wrote:

What invasion?

Scaredy-cats always call higher immigration an "invasion," as though they're landing warships on our beaches and moving armed soldiers through the countryside.

It makes them feel all special.

It cracks me up the balderdash they post, from ethnic cleansing, to invasions, not one of them has a scooby doo on real history in regards to invasions and ethnic cleansing, and like I say are the real problem when it comes to integration, other prove easily how they can get along, they show why they are the problem, because they have no valid reason not to except poor prejudice Ben.

Didge wrote:

Ben_Reilly wrote:

Scaredy-cats always call higher immigration an "invasion," as though they're landing warships on our beaches and moving armed soldiers through the countryside.

It makes them feel all special.

It cracks me up the balderdash they post, from ethnic cleansing, to invasions, not one of them has  a scooby doo on real history in regards to invasions and ethnic cleansing, and like I say are the real problem when it comes to integration, other prove easily how they can get along, they show why they are the problem, because they have no valid reason not to except poor prejudice Ben.

funny you should be saying that didge because you were screaming at the top of your voice just the other day about a Russian invasion into Ukraine

Tommy Monk wrote:Spain welcomes wealthy retired British with open arms.
And Australia is in need of skilled workers from here.
There are also plenty of Spanish and Australiano here too.
We don't want or need any more immigrants.

PMSL laughing again, they are not all wealthy though, but again this is about immigration in large numbers, and they accept them in Spain, you though claimed it was scatterings, which as seen ended you up with egg on your face.
Look the only problem multiculturalism has is some ethnics that come here and prejudice people like you, the reality is most integrate that come here and most welcome them, you and the ones that do not integrate are the issue.
The fact is if you advocate immigrants not coming here then that means you also wish to deny millions of Brits to move else where, that is nothing but the selfish dummy throwing of a prejudice person with the mentality of a spoilt child, lucky enough to be born here, who thinks he can dictate where people can live, even though he does not own the country

Ben_Reilly wrote:

Spindleshanks wrote:

What invasion?

Scaredy-cats always call higher immigration an "invasion," as though they're landing warships on our beaches and moving armed soldiers through the countryside.

It makes them feel all special.

Oh, they've landed by land sea and air and as for armed, do you not read the English newspapers?

[quote="smelly_bandit"]

Didge wrote:


It cracks me up the balderdash they post, from ethnic cleansing, to invasions, not one of them has  a scooby doo on real history in regards to invasions and ethnic cleansing, and like I say are the real problem when it comes to integration, other prove easily how they can get along, they show why they are the problem, because they have no valid reason not to except poor prejudice Ben.

funny you should be saying that didge because you were screaming at the top of your voice just the other day about a Russian invasion into Ukraine [/quote

 ://?roflmao?/: ://?roflmao?/: ://?roflmao?/: ://?roflmao?/: 


Immigration and armed soldiers entering a nation are two different things, what armed forced have invaded here?

Take your time

smelly_bandit wrote:

Didge wrote:

Ben_Reilly wrote:

Scaredy-cats always call higher immigration an "invasion," as though they're landing warships on our beaches and moving armed soldiers through the countryside.

It makes them feel all special.

It cracks me up the balderdash they post, from ethnic cleansing, to invasions, not one of them has  a scooby doo on real history in regards to invasions and ethnic cleansing, and like I say are the real problem when it comes to integration, other prove easily how they can get along, they show why they are the problem, because they have no valid reason not to except poor prejudice Ben.

funny you should be saying that didge because you were screaming at the top of your voice just the other day about a Russian invasion into Ukraine

Which is an actually invasion, with military equipment.

It is an unwanted arrival of massive amounts of foreigners, occupying our towns and cities and displacing the indigenous population.
This is an invasion.

BigAndy9 wrote:

Ben_Reilly wrote:

Spindleshanks wrote:

What invasion?

Scaredy-cats always call higher immigration an "invasion," as though they're landing warships on our beaches and moving armed soldiers through the countryside.

It makes them feel all special.

Oh, they've landed by land sea and air and as for armed, do you not read the English newspapers?

Sounds like it's time for you to cowboy up, then, BA -- see you on the BBC!

Ben_Reilly wrote:

smelly_bandit wrote:

funny you should be saying that didge because you were screaming at the top of your voice just the other day about a Russian invasion into Ukraine

Which is an actually invasion, with military equipment.

the invisible kind of military equipment???

victorisnotamused wrote:what does that idiotic comment mean then??

gawd folks its another dodgy didge clone.....
speaks in riddles

Gawd have you never heard the saying you can lead a horse to water but can't make it drink?

It means you can give someone as much education as you like, but if they can't be arsed to learn, they won't no matter how good the teaching is.

Didge, if there are a million in Spain and Australia, then the other 4 million are a scattering among the rest of The worlds 7 billion people.
Much different to massive amounts of people from everywhere in the world all wanting to be arriving here.

Tommy Monk wrote:It is an unwanted arrival of massive amounts of foreigners, occupying our towns and cities and displacing the indigenous population.
This is an invasion.

Unwanted by you and some others mainly based on prejudice views, some have genuine views on infrastructure, your is not genuine, it is prejudice

Didge wrote:

smelly_bandit wrote:

funny you should be saying that didge because you were screaming at the top of your voice just the other day about a Russian invasion into Ukraine [/quote

 ://?roflmao?/: ://?roflmao?/: ://?roflmao?/: ://?roflmao?/: 


Immigration and armed soldiers entering a nation are two different things, what armed forced have invaded here?

Take your time

what armed force invaded Lebanon??

none and yet they still fell to the Muslims due to unchecked mass immigration from Muslim countries

you really are quite stupid didge if you think that a mass increase of a certain kind of ethnic into an area wont change the demographics of that area, that fact that it has already happened and happening across europe and the UK is plain for all to see except you



cant for the life of me work out why you're missing the obvious

Tommy Monk wrote:Didge, if there are a million in Spain and Australia, then the other 4 million are a scattering among the rest of The worlds 7 billion people.
Much different to massive amounts of people from everywhere in the world all wanting to be arriving here.

WTF, we are talking about nations that have high immigration , these two nations have high immigration but do not deny or claim as you do to deny Brits, so again you perform the artful dodger, what does it matter about other nations when I am showing you nations with high migration of Brits


So funny

Tommy Monk wrote:It is an unwanted arrival of massive amounts of foreigners, occupying our towns and cities and displacing the indigenous population.
This is an invasion.

invasion via demographic shift

smelly_bandit wrote:


what armed force invaded Lebanon??

none and yet they still fell to the Muslims due to unchecked mass immigration from Muslim countries

you really are quite stupid didge if you think that a mass increase of a certain kind of ethnic into an area wont change the demographics of that area, that fact that it has already happened and happening across europe and the UK is plain for all to see except you



cant for the life of me work out why you're missing the obvious

Israel invaded Lebanon

No you are stupid, you claim immigration is an invasion when it is something a country allows, armed forces not invited, is an invasion, I suggest being an Afrikaan, English is difficult for you to understand.
Demographics have changed constantly around the world for centuries, so much so America is today a multicultural nation, which identify as American though very proud and Identify of their ethnic roots, they show no issue with being this way and show it works very well.

All my reasons against mass immigration are genuine and valid.

Tommy Monk wrote:All my reasons against mass immigration are genuine and valid.

No you were exposed as prejudiced when you denied people who are black and Asian of being part of this nation, even though they have been here for centuries, so it is obvious your reasons are racial, not anything genuine

Didge wrote:

smelly_bandit wrote:


what armed force invaded Lebanon??

none and yet they still fell to the Muslims due to unchecked mass immigration from Muslim countries

you really are quite stupid didge if you think that a mass increase of a certain kind of ethnic into an area wont change the demographics of that area, that fact that it has already happened and happening across europe and the UK is plain for all to see except you



cant for the life of me work out why you're missing the obvious

Israel invaded Lebanon

No you are stupid, you claim immigration is an invasion when it is something a country allows, armed forces not invited, is an invasion, I suggest being an Afrikaan, English is difficult for you to understand.
Demographics have changed constantly around the world for centuries, so much so America is today a multicultural nation, which identify as American though very proud of their ethnic roots, they show no issue with being this way and show it works very well.

when did Israel invade Lebanon??

what year

 ::D:: 

yes im aware that demographics shift over time - decades and centuries

not years

the mass immigration project was labors social engineering pipe dream which compacted several dozen decades of immigration into 13 years

gee i wonder what could possibly go wrong with that

Didge wrote:

Tommy Monk wrote:All my reasons against mass immigration are genuine and valid.

No you were exposed as prejudiced when you denied people who are black and Asian of being part of this nation, even though they have been here for centuries, so it is obvious your reasons are racial, not anything genuine

so you are approving of slavery then??