Growth of ethnic minorities 'could undermine English identity'

Almost one in three people in Britain will be from an ethnic minority within a generation, a report suggests.

Non-white people will make up between 20 and 30 per cent of the population by 2050, Policy Exchange says. The current share is around 14 per cent.

The report could also raise questions about the future of the English national identity, which it found is primarily adopted by white people. The think tank, which has close links to the Conservative Party leadership, also highlights differences in the political leanings of different ethnic groups, advising politicians not to treat minority voters as a bloc.

The expected growth in the non-white population is largely attributed to a higher birth rate among ethnic minority Britons. A quarter of children aged under 10 in the UK are from ethnic minorities. By contrast, 95 per cent of people aged over 60 are white.

Over the past decade, the white population has remained roughly the same while the minority population has almost doubled, accounting for 80 per cent of population growth, it adds.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/immigration/10809481/Non-white-people-almost-30-per-cent-of-population-by-2050.html

Funny, I'm sure I remember reading a couple of years back that the percentage of minorities would be 25% at most by 2050. Looks like the figures are changing every year. Even taking these figures and the difference in birth rates, it would appear that it's the indigenous English who'll be in the minority in the not too distant future.

I love it when people say things like over my dead body when i tell them their country will be run by Muslims one day.

So so blind.

Tesstacious wrote: Almost one in three people in Britain will be from an ethnic minority within a generation, a report suggests.

Non-white people will make up between 20 and 30 per cent of the population by 2050, Policy Exchange says. The current share is around 14 per cent.

The report could also raise questions about the future of the English national identity, which it found is primarily adopted by white people. The think tank, which has close links to the Conservative Party leadership, also highlights differences in the political leanings of different ethnic groups, advising politicians not to treat minority voters as a bloc.

The expected growth in the non-white population is largely attributed to a higher birth rate among ethnic minority Britons. A quarter of children aged under 10 in the UK are from ethnic minorities. By contrast, 95 per cent of people aged over 60 are white.

Over the past decade, the white population has remained roughly the same while the minority population has almost doubled, accounting for 80 per cent of population growth, it adds.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/immigration/10809481/Non-white-people-almost-30-per-cent-of-population-by-2050.html

Funny, I'm sure I remember reading a couple of years back that the percentage of minorities would be 25% at most by 2050.  Looks like the figures are changing every year.  Even taking these figures and the difference in birth rates, it would appear that it's the indigenous English who'll be in the minority in the not too distant future.

Indiginous English?

Who would that be then?

Spindleshanks wrote:

Tesstacious wrote: Almost one in three people in Britain will be from an ethnic minority within a generation, a report suggests.

Non-white people will make up between 20 and 30 per cent of the population by 2050, Policy Exchange says. The current share is around 14 per cent.

The report could also raise questions about the future of the English national identity, which it found is primarily adopted by white people. The think tank, which has close links to the Conservative Party leadership, also highlights differences in the political leanings of different ethnic groups, advising politicians not to treat minority voters as a bloc.

The expected growth in the non-white population is largely attributed to a higher birth rate among ethnic minority Britons. A quarter of children aged under 10 in the UK are from ethnic minorities. By contrast, 95 per cent of people aged over 60 are white.

Over the past decade, the white population has remained roughly the same while the minority population has almost doubled, accounting for 80 per cent of population growth, it adds.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/immigration/10809481/Non-white-people-almost-30-per-cent-of-population-by-2050.html

Funny, I'm sure I remember reading a couple of years back that the percentage of minorities would be 25% at most by 2050.  Looks like the figures are changing every year.  Even taking these figures and the difference in birth rates, it would appear that it's the indigenous English who'll be in the minority in the not too distant future.

Indiginous English?

Who would that be then?

To me - ones that had lived here for a few generations. Obviously you can't go back to the Romans and Normans - had that sillyness with Didge, ain't going there again. And you can piss off - it doesn't include skellingtons.

Tesstacious wrote:

Spindleshanks wrote:

Indiginous English?

Who would that be then?

To me - ones that had lived here for a few generations.  Obviously you can't go back to the Romans and Normans - had that sillyness with Didge, ain't going there again.  And you can piss off - it doesn't include skellingtons.

So you would include the whole spectrum of ethnic groups in that indiginous english classification then?

Just to add, are you taking that from now, because by 2150 those that arrived two generations ago will probably be about 4 generations down the line. Will they count as indiginous english then?

Spindleshanks wrote:Just to add, are you taking that from now, because by 2150 those that arrived two generations ago will probably be about 4 generations down the line.  Will they count as indiginous english then?

Depends if they adopt the English culture. If they want to remain rooted in the cultures of their countries of origin, then no.

Tesstacious wrote:

Spindleshanks wrote:Just to add, are you taking that from now, because by 2150 those that arrived two generations ago will probably be about 4 generations down the line.  Will they count as indiginous english then?

Depends if they adopt the English culture.  If they want to remain rooted in the cultures of their countries of origin, then no.

Ahhh the good old English culture, like food, the architecture, even the language, all of which is quite heavily influenced from other parts of the world.

Spindleshanks wrote:

Tesstacious wrote:
Depends if they adopt the English culture.  If they want to remain rooted in the cultures of their countries of origin, then no.

Ahhh the good old English culture, like food, the architecture, even the language, all of which is quite heavily influenced from other parts of the world.

Well, if people don't like "the good old English culture" - people like you who want to insult it and take the piss out of it, there's an easy solution - fuck off.

Tesstacious wrote:

Spindleshanks wrote:

Ahhh the good old English culture, like food, the architecture, even the language, all of which is quite heavily influenced from other parts of the world.

Well, if people don't like "the good old English culture" - people like you who want to insult it and take the piss out of it, there's an easy solution - fuck off.

Ooooh, I guess that stung a bit.

Why do people find it so hard to accept that the culture in this country is heavily influenced by foreign culture?

Spindleshanks wrote:

Tesstacious wrote:

Well, if people don't like "the good old English culture" - people like you who want to insult it and take the piss out of it, there's an easy solution - fuck off.

Ooooh, I guess that stung a bit.

Why do people find it so hard to accept that the culture in this country is heavily influenced by foreign culture?

This 'knock the English' mentality that's been so sucked up by the left makes me sick. I'd love to see you over in Ireland taking the piss out of the Irish culture - you'd get a good debate on the subject - after you'd been punched in the head...

Tesstacious wrote:

Spindleshanks wrote:

Ooooh, I guess that stung a bit.

Why do people find it so hard to accept that the culture in this country is heavily influenced by foreign culture?

This 'knock the English' mentality that's been so sucked up by the left makes me sick.  I'd love to see you over in Ireland taking the piss out of the Irish culture - you'd get a good debate on the subject - after you'd been punched in the head...

We have had hundreds and hundreds and hundreds of years of immigration into this country from varying parts of the world, why do you think English Culture is what it is now.

Should that cultural evolution stop dead just because people like you don't like new foreigers coming in, adding to it and enriching it as the ones who came years ago have done?

Spindleshanks wrote:

Tesstacious wrote:

This 'knock the English' mentality that's been so sucked up by the left makes me sick.  I'd love to see you over in Ireland taking the piss out of the Irish culture - you'd get a good debate on the subject - after you'd been punched in the head...

We have had hundreds and hundreds and hundreds of years of immigration into this country from varying parts of the world, why do you think English Culture is what it is now.

Should that cultural evolution stop dead just because people like you don't like new foreigers coming in, adding to it and enriching it as the ones who came years ago have done?

Same old pc crap. Yes we've been influenced over the centuries from immigration and invasion by various Europeans, but NEVER have we had such a huge influx over such a short space of time from a culture that's so intrinsically alien to our own.

Tesstacious wrote:

Spindleshanks wrote:

We have had hundreds and hundreds and hundreds of years of immigration into this country from varying parts of the world, why do you think English Culture is what it is now.

Should that cultural evolution stop dead just because people like you don't like new foreigers coming in, adding to it and enriching it as the ones who came years ago have done?

Same old pc crap.  Yes we've been influenced over the centuries from immigration and invasion by various Europeans, but NEVER have we had such a huge influx over such a short space of time from a culture that's so intrinsically alien to our own.

Hmmmm, they are really taking over aren't they.




2011 census

Hi Spindle. Yes indeed we've had migrations over the centuries, the Romans, Saxons, Normans, Danes, and although some were worshippers of other Gods and Goddesses, they eventually adopted Christianity. More on that in a minute. These different races were white, like the indigenous British people. But, they eventually became Christian, and this is what our heritage and traditions are based on. Nearly 2,000 years of Christian modes of life and morals, such as the Commandments. These attributes forged the way we are, and indeed still are, although these days we are seeing that long tradition being watered down, and our way of life being interfered with and altered by foriegn cultures. Our jobs are going to cheaper foreign labour, our NHS is inundated by foreigners, many houses and flats are going to migrants. All these things add up to a struggle for our own people to survive and live comfortably and healthily.

One small example is the Subway shops. 200 of them, nationally, are stopping selling any pork menus, ie. bacon etc. Is that the start of Halal foods making our own traditional food illegal? Where will it end? When we are the minority? When Muslim MPs outnumber our own, and alter our laws and everything else?

No Spindle, I'm not racist, just trying to be logical and factual.

stardesk wrote:Hi Spindle. Yes indeed we've had migrations over the centuries, the Romans, Saxons, Normans, Danes, and although some were worshippers of other Gods and Goddesses, they eventually adopted Christianity. More on that in a minute. These different races were white, like the indigenous British people. But, they eventually became Christian, and this is what our heritage and traditions are based on. Nearly 2,000 years of Christian modes of life and morals, such as the Commandments. These attributes forged the way we are, and indeed still are, although these days we are seeing that long tradition being watered down, and our way of life being interfered with and altered by foriegn cultures. Our jobs are going to cheaper foreign labour, our NHS is inundated by foreigners, many houses and flats are going to migrants. All these things add up to a struggle for our own people to survive and live comfortably and healthily.

One small example is the Subway shops. 200 of them, nationally, are stopping selling any pork menus, ie. bacon etc. Is that the start of Halal foods making our own traditional food illegal? Where will it end? When we are the minority? When Muslim MPs outnumber our own, and alter our laws and everything else?

No Spindle, I'm not racist, just trying to be logical and factual.

They weren't all white at all

People of African and Asian origin have lived in Britain for at least two millennia. They arrived here many hundreds of years before the massive forced migrations sparked by the slave trade and the British colonisation of India. And by the time the SS Windrush arrived in 1948, famously carrying the first postwar arrivals from the Caribbean, Britain had a firmly established Black and Asian population.

http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/pathways/blackhistory/intro/intro.htm

Tess showing her true colours, abusing Spindleshanks just because he does not agree with her, what a suprise.
What she fails to neglect is that many people like Blacks, Asians have been here centuries also, so can their descendants not claim to be English, or does English only constitute a skin colour?
Sorry those that claim that have no concept of what makes a nation and it has bugger all to do with skin colour.


So the whole article is claiming that this country will be made up of around 20-30% ethnic minorities, even though most of the nation is made up from ethnic groups, how absurd through centuries of its history.

That was only a few in comparison.
What is happening now and has been for last few years is completely different.
There is no want or need for any more.
And nobody has ever voted for any of it anyway!
So you could say it has been forced onto the country against the will of The people.
How very 'progressive'....
Maybe you should read this....
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2005/07/0719_050719_britishgene.html

Tommy Monk wrote:That was only a few in comparison.
What is happening now and has been for last few years is completely different.
There is no want or need for any more.
And nobody has ever voted for any of it anyway!
So you could say it has been forced onto the country against the will of The people.
How very 'progressive'....
Maybe you should read this....
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2005/07/0719_050719_britishgene.html

Back in those days the population wasn't 60 odd million either.

Spindleshanks wrote:

Tommy Monk wrote:That was only a few in comparison.
What is happening now and has been for last few years is completely different.
There is no want or need for any more.
And nobody has ever voted for any of it anyway!
So you could say it has been forced onto the country against the will of The people.
How very 'progressive'....
Maybe you should read this....
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2005/07/0719_050719_britishgene.html

Back in those days the population wasn't 60 odd million either.

Yep was tiny and the original British people came from the Basque region or so it is claimed, but everyone is descended from immigrants and all are descended from Africa, so a very idiotic argument if I ever heard one from Tommy using something well out of date.

Didge wrote:Tess showing her true colours, abusing Spindleshanks just because he does not agree with her, what a suprise.
What she fails to neglect is that many people like Blacks, Asians have been here centuries also, so can their descendants not claim to be English, or does English only constitute a skin colour?
Sorry those that claim that have no concept of what makes a nation and it has bugger all to do with skin colour.


So the whole article is claiming that this country will be made up of around 20-30% ethnic minorities, even though most of the nation is made up from ethnic groups, how absurd through centuries of its history.

Maybe you should try reading the posts before doing your usual rant. Where have I said anything about skin colour? Read where Shank asked me if I included immigrants of different coloured skin as being English? What did I reply? He/she(?) then went on to abuse the English culture, which I defended.

Didge wrote:

Spindleshanks wrote:

Back in those days the population wasn't 60 odd million either.

Yep was tiny and the original British people came from the Basque region or so it is claimed, but everyone is descended from immigrants and all are descended from Africa, so a very idiotic argument if I ever heard one from Tommy using something well out of date.

And your (oft repeated) reply that we all came out of Africa is something well out of date, and widely disputed.  So it's your argument that's idiotic. Anyway, that's going back millennia. If you follow that logic, well we all originated from primordial slime - doesn't mean we're all really slugs.

Waffle dodge.
Saying we're all immigrants is on justification for mass immigration happening now.
We don't want or need any more.
So they can just stay where they are or go elsewhere.

Tesstacious wrote:

Didge wrote:Tess showing her true colours, abusing Spindleshanks just because he does not agree with her, what a suprise.
What she fails to neglect is that many people like Blacks, Asians have been here centuries also, so can their descendants not claim to be English, or does English only constitute a skin colour?
Sorry those that claim that have no concept of what makes a nation and it has bugger all to do with skin colour.


So the whole article is claiming that this country will be made up of around 20-30% ethnic minorities, even though most of the nation is made up from ethnic groups, how absurd through centuries of its history.

Maybe you should try reading the posts before doing your usual rant.  Where have I said anything about skin colour? Read where Shank asked me if I included immigrants of different coloured skin as being English?  What did I reply? He/she(?) then went on to abuse the English culture, which I defended.  

I am on about you abusing posters and clearly you do not have me on ignore after all Tess.

Whoops


He did not abuse the English culture, he was being ironic, but because you always throw your dummy out irony is clearly lost on you. The f act is English culture was formed from many different ethnic groups, our language is made up for example of Germanic, Norman, Latin, Celtic etc, how multicultural can you get for example, let alone how this country has adapted many aspects from all these cultures to make what we constitute to be English, thus in other words the English culture has been and still is for ever changing. Most cultural pessimists always use poor arguments as if our culture is being eroded and it never has.

Didge wrote:

Tesstacious wrote:

Maybe you should try reading the posts before doing your usual rant.  Where have I said anything about skin colour? Read where Shank asked me if I included immigrants of different coloured skin as being English?  What did I reply? He/she(?) then went on to abuse the English culture, which I defended.  

I am on about you abusing posters and clearly you do not have me on ignore after all Tess.

Whoops


He did not abuse the English culture, he was being ironic, but because you always throw your dummy out irony is clearly lost on you. The f act is English culture was formed from many different ethnic groups, our language is made up for example of Germanic, Norman, Latin, Celtic etc, how multicultural can you get for example, let alone how this country has adapted many aspects from all these cultures to make what we constitute to be English, thus in other words the English culture has been and still is for ever changing. Most cultural pessimists always use poor arguments as if our culture is being eroded and it never has.

Glad you pointed that out about being on ignore. There's no ignore button on here like on Flap. How do I do it?

Tommy Monk wrote:Waffle dodge.
Saying we're all immigrants is on justification for mass immigration happening now.
We don't want or need any more.
So they can just stay where they are or go elsewhere.

We are all descended from immigrants, it is a fact a poor person of low intellect as yourself never has an answer to.
The world population is growing, did your parents never teach you to share what is not even yours?

Tesstacious wrote:

Didge wrote:Tess showing her true colours, abusing Spindleshanks just because he does not agree with her, what a suprise.
What she fails to neglect is that many people like Blacks, Asians have been here centuries also, so can their descendants not claim to be English, or does English only constitute a skin colour?
Sorry those that claim that have no concept of what makes a nation and it has bugger all to do with skin colour.


So the whole article is claiming that this country will be made up of around 20-30% ethnic minorities, even though most of the nation is made up from ethnic groups, how absurd through centuries of its history.

Maybe you should try reading the posts before doing your usual rant.  Where have I said anything about skin colour? Read where Shank asked me if I included immigrants of different coloured skin as being English?  What did I reply? He/she(?) then went on to abuse the English culture, which I defended.  

I didn't abuse it, I celebrated the fact it is an ever evolving mish mash of different cultures.

Tesstacious wrote:

Didge wrote:

I am on about you abusing posters and clearly you do not have me on ignore after all Tess.

Whoops


He did not abuse the English culture, he was being ironic, but because you always throw your dummy out irony is clearly lost on you. The f act is English culture was formed from many different ethnic groups, our language is made up for example of Germanic, Norman, Latin, Celtic etc, how multicultural can you get for example, let alone how this country has adapted many aspects from all these cultures to make what we constitute to be English, thus in other words the English culture has been and still is for ever changing. Most cultural pessimists always use poor arguments as if our culture is being eroded and it never has.

Glad you pointed that out about being on ignore.  There's no ignore button on here like on Flap.  How do I do it?

Not reply????


Stop being so childish Tess, like I said grow up, nobody was rude to you here, yet you were straight away insulting to Spindleshanks, just because he/she debated better here than you and was not rude to you.
What he/she said was correct, you have to counter that

Good luck

Tesstacious wrote:

Didge wrote:

I am on about you abusing posters and clearly you do not have me on ignore after all Tess.

Whoops


He did not abuse the English culture, he was being ironic, but because you always throw your dummy out irony is clearly lost on you. The f act is English culture was formed from many different ethnic groups, our language is made up for example of Germanic, Norman, Latin, Celtic etc, how multicultural can you get for example, let alone how this country has adapted many aspects from all these cultures to make what we constitute to be English, thus in other words the English culture has been and still is for ever changing. Most cultural pessimists always use poor arguments as if our culture is being eroded and it never has.

Glad you pointed that out about being on ignore.  There's no ignore button on here like on Flap.  How do I do it?

Go to the friends or foes section Tess.You'll find what you need there.

Shady wrote:

Tesstacious wrote:

Glad you pointed that out about being on ignore.  There's no ignore button on here like on Flap.  How do I do it?

Go to the friends or foes section Tess.You'll find what you need there.

Ahoy me coward, still running from debate HAR HAR HAR

 ::D:: 

Good afternoon LibLabCon left wing racists.

There's no need to be ashamed of being a whitey,you were born that way & had no choice.

Multiculturism is centuries old in the UK & we like it.It's just that we don't like invasion very much.

Gradual merging of different people combined with integration is one thing & is all well & good.But invasion & ethnic cleansing of white people by the previous & incumbent governments are unacceptable.

LibLabCon caused racism in the UK & now they have to deal with the consequences.

Shady wrote:Good afternoon LibLabCon left wing racists.
Poor claim made by someone who claims whites are being eradicated even though they are the predominant group now in 3 continents where they were not before

There's no need to be ashamed of being a whitey,you were born that way & had no choice.
Ashamed, I think people are proud to be human, no matter the skin colour, as a person who claims to go abroad you would know your skin colour darkens in the sun, so what difference does skin colour make when biologically we are all one race?
None

Multiculturism is centuries old in the UK & we like it.It's just that we don't like invasion very much.
Multiculturalism, is cultures, not skin colour as again we have had Black and Asians in this country for centuries, do they not constitute being English their descendants?

Gradual merging of different people combined with integration is one thing & is all well & good.But invasion & ethnic cleansing of white people by the previous & incumbent governments are unacceptable.
Hilarious, so again shady exposes his racism that people cannot be a unified nation, unless people of a lighter skin colour are predominant, even though they vastly are and he calls this an invasion, where people have come to these shores to make a new life, whilst ignoring that in Australia and the America's it was invasions.

LibLabCon caused racism in the UK & now they have to deal with the consequences.

It is easy to expose racists, they are on skin colour views as if afraid some humans will disappear, odd that one

Shady wrote:Good afternoon LibLabCon left wing racists.

There's no need to be ashamed of being a whitey,you were born that way & had no choice.

Multiculturism is centuries old in the UK & we like it.It's just that we don't like invasion very much.

Gradual merging of different people combined with integration is one thing & is all well & good.But invasion & ethnic cleansing of white people by the previous & incumbent governments are unacceptable.

LibLabCon caused racism in the UK & now they have to deal with the consequences.

Who's ashamed of being white?

Somehow I don't think LibLabCon existed back in the dark days of history and racism was rife then.

Spindleshanks wrote:

Shady wrote:Good afternoon LibLabCon left wing racists.

There's no need to be ashamed of being a whitey,you were born that way & had no choice.

Multiculturism is centuries old in the UK & we like it.It's just that we don't like invasion very much.

Gradual merging of different people combined with integration is one thing & is all well & good.But invasion & ethnic cleansing of white people by the previous & incumbent governments are unacceptable.

LibLabCon caused racism in the UK & now they have to deal with the consequences.

Who's ashamed of being white?

Somehow I don't think LibLabCon existed back in the dark days of history and racism was rife then.

Brilliant.

  

Spindleshanks wrote:

Shady wrote:Good afternoon LibLabCon left wing racists.

There's no need to be ashamed of being a whitey,you were born that way & had no choice.

Multiculturism is centuries old in the UK & we like it.It's just that we don't like invasion very much.

Gradual merging of different people combined with integration is one thing & is all well & good.But invasion & ethnic cleansing of white people by the previous & incumbent governments are unacceptable.

LibLabCon caused racism in the UK & now they have to deal with the consequences.

Who's ashamed of being white?

Somehow I don't think LibLabCon existed back in the dark days of history and racism was rife then.

But they exist now.

Shady wrote:

Spindleshanks wrote:

Who's ashamed of being white?

Somehow I don't think LibLabCon existed back in the dark days of history and racism was rife then.

But they exist now.

Yes people of lighter skin have existed for thousands of years and have continued to grow as populations, their original ancestors though did have much darker skin, odd that one eh?

Shady wrote:

Spindleshanks wrote:

Who's ashamed of being white?

Somehow I don't think LibLabCon existed back in the dark days of history and racism was rife then.

But they exist now.

Yes they do and now racism is an offence.

We don't want or need any more immigration.
Why can't people just stay where they are or go elsewhere?

Tommy Monk wrote:We don't want or need any more immigration.
Why can't people just stay where they are or go elsewhere?

I assume you don't appove of English people moving abroad to live then?

Tommy Monk wrote:We don't want or need any more immigration.
Why can't people just stay where they are or go elsewhere?

did you tell that to the 6 million British ex=pats around the world?
How about all those descended from Europeans in Australia, Africa and the Americas etc?
Is it only a one way street?
Again did your parents never tell you to share what is not yours to start with?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-27263790
Coming soon to a town near you..... and your town too!
I'm glad you lefties are So happy celebrating the 'diversity' or should that be celebrating the absence of white British......?!

Did my parents tell me to 'share'what is not mine?


Do you mean stealing?

Tommy Monk wrote:Did my parents tell me to 'share'what is not mine?


Do you mean stealing?

In School you did not own anything did you, did you share what you used at school?

So no not stealing, borrowing, you do not own this country either, yet seem to think you can decide who can and cannot come here, rather odd that and even worse surely you condemn (which I do not as they like others have a right to a new life) the 6 million ex-pats who moved abroad?

Didge wrote:

Tommy Monk wrote:Did my parents tell me to 'share'what is not mine?


Do you mean stealing?

In School you did not own anything did you, did you share what you used at school?

So no not stealing, borrowing, you do not own this country either, yet seem to think you can decide who can and cannot come here, rather odd that and even worse surely condemned (which I do not as they like others have a right to a new life) the 6 million ex-pats who moved abroad?

No, he does what every other person in the world does - votes.

If people believed we could get rid of foreigners we'd be bunking them off down town.

It is in fact them bunking the English whites off!

Tommy Monk wrote:http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-27263790
Coming soon to a town near you..... and your town too!
I'm glad you lefties are So happy celebrating the 'diversity' or should that be celebrating the absence of white British......?!

That is what I call excellent and a great way for many different ethnic and British children to learn each others languages and cultures, what an excellent idea

Tommy Monk wrote:http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-27263790
Coming soon to a town near you..... and your town too!
I'm glad you lefties are So happy celebrating the 'diversity' or should that be celebrating the absence of white British......?!

Good afternoon Tommy.

The left wing racists go round in circles doing their best to avoid the truth.But that's what we must expect from bigots.

BigAndy9 wrote:

Didge wrote:

In School you did not own anything did you, did you share what you used at school?

So no not stealing, borrowing, you do not own this country either, yet seem to think you can decide who can and cannot come here, rather odd that and even worse surely condemned (which I do not as they like others have a right to a new life) the 6 million ex-pats who moved abroad?

No, he does what every other person in the world does - votes.

If people believed we could get rid of foreigners we'd be bunking them off down town.

It is in fact them bunking the English whites off!

That did not answer my question and now do you speak for Matti, interesting, are you Matti/tommy?

Ha ha Ha ha

Yes people do vote, so if they vote and UKIP do not win a general election, you respect the electorate then do you Andy Pandy?

BigAndy9 wrote:

Didge wrote:

In School you did not own anything did you, did you share what you used at school?

So no not stealing, borrowing, you do not own this country either, yet seem to think you can decide who can and cannot come here, rather odd that and even worse surely condemned (which I do not as they like others have a right to a new life) the 6 million ex-pats who moved abroad?

No, he does what every other person in the world does - votes.

If people believed we could get rid of foreigners we'd be bunking them off down town.

It is in fact them bunking the English whites off!

Andy can you stop speaking common sense please?It confuses them.

From that BBC link

Children from Iraq, the Philippines, Somalia, India, Nepal, Cyprus, Romania and Slovakia, to name but a few, mingle happily and play together.

Mingle happily. Shame we don't seem to be able to follow that example in this country isn't it?