Teenage asylum seeker brutally attacked in Croydon

Raggamuffin wrote:

Thorin wrote:


I got his post perfectly

read again

How can asylum seekers afford to go the pub?

So to Tommy, only white people are British and not blacks or Asians (racism again)

Blacks and Asians go the pub do they not?

So tommy making dumb unfounded claims again

Again its you thinking only white people commit racism, by accusing he media of insinuating this was done by White British people, even though none even insinuated it was

Hilarity ensues again with Tommy's fuckwittery.

That was your post, not his post. You didn't get the point of his post at all. Still, subtlety was never your strong point.

eddie wrote:Enjoying yourselves?

Angry Andy wrote:I think we will all just agree that Tom and Raggs enjoyed the attack and fully condone it, in the expectation it was not carried out by their BNP compatriots.
Fuck me, they will feel pretty dumb if the attackers are their chums.

Thorin wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

That was your post, not his post. You didn't get the point of his post at all. Still, subtlety was never your strong point.

I saw through his fuckwittery

Clearly you cant, where again Tommy is of the view only racist attackers are white British

See his post to Andy

Hilarity ensues

Angry Andy wrote:I have read all 3 pages , paying particular note of Raggs contributions.
I can find no evidence from her posts that she condemns or abhors the attack.
It can be taken therefore that she
A) doesnt give a shit about rhe welfare of the victim because he was an asylum seeker
or
B) She condones the attack because it MAY have been conducted by thugs of non English ethnicty.

She has, however, repeated her support for Tom,.

Which we always come to expect.

Raggamuffin wrote:

Thorin wrote:


I saw through his fuckwittery

Clearly you cant, where again Tommy is of the view only racist attackers are white British

See his post to Andy

Hilarity ensues

No you didn't - you just didn't get what he was saying. That's no surprise - you use straw man arguments all the time.

eddie wrote:Enjoying yourselves?

Raggamuffin wrote:

Angry Andy wrote:I have read all 3 pages , paying particular note of Raggs contributions.
I can find no evidence from her posts that she condemns or abhors the attack.
It can be taken therefore that she
A) doesnt give a shit about rhe welfare of the victim because he was an asylum seeker
or
B) She condones the attack because it MAY have been conducted by thugs of non English ethnicty.

She has, however, repeated her support for Tom,.

Which we always come to expect.

Would you care to back any of that up now you've seen my earlier post?

Lying scoundrel.

Thorin wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

Would you care to back any of that up now you've seen my earlier post?

Lying scoundrel.

Well you have defended Tommy and he is as racist as they come

Raggamuffin wrote:

Thorin wrote:


Well you have defended Tommy and he is as racist as they come

I've defended him against the abuse you and Andy are hurling at him, and your terrible tag-teaming. Problem?

Raggamuffin wrote:

Jules wrote:



I'm not surprised. I remember the fierce way Tommy stubbornly defended his namesake Tommy Mair, the nasty brute who murdered a liberal MP in cold blood. Tommy Monks would not hear a word said against his RW soulmate. Sweet!    

Labour MP actually, and I don't recall Tommy defending him. Tag-teaming with Didge will get you brownie points galore though.

Thorin wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

I've defended him against the abuse you and Andy are hurling at him, and your terrible tag-teaming. Problem?

What abuse?

So again you class criticism as abuse

Hallmarks of sharia law on blasphemy.

Hilarity ensues

Raggamuffin wrote:

Thorin wrote:


What abuse?

So again you class criticism as abuse

Hallmarks of sharia law on blasphemy.

Hilarity ensues

Andy was abusive, and you're trolling him and abusing him.

Jules wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

Labour MP actually, and I don't recall Tommy defending him. Tag-teaming with Didge will get you brownie points galore though.

No, Thorins post struck a cord simply cos I remember that Tommy's priorities during the endless discussions about Jo Cox's murder seemed all wrong too. I would have agreed with whoever had said it, not just Thorin!

And why don't you take a break from saying ''tag teaming, tag teaming'' all the time, like a stuck record?    Accept that people will sometimes agree with each other. You yourself are certainly NOT  above jumping in to stick the boot into someone who is ALREADY being lambasted in a thread, or laughing spitefully at them, Ragga. Some of us have long memories!  

I think I've only made 2 posts in this thread so far, and I will leave you to it now, as you seem to have the time, energy and inclination for these endless arguments. I don't. Cheerio.

Jules wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

Labour MP actually, and I don't recall Tommy defending him. Tag-teaming with Didge will get you brownie points galore though.

No, Thorins post struck a cord simply cos I remember that Tommy's priorities during the endless discussions about Jo Cox's murder seemed all wrong too. I would have agreed with whoever had said it, not just Thorin!

And why don't you take a break from saying ''tag teaming, tag teaming'' all the time, like a stuck record?    Accept that people will sometimes agree with each other. You yourself are certainly NOT  above jumping in to stick the boot into someone who is ALREADY being lambasted in a thread, or laughing spitefully at them, Ragga. Some of us have long memories!  

I think I've only made 2 posts in this thread so far, and I will leave you to it now, as you seem to have the time, energy and inclination for these endless arguments. I don't. Cheerio.

Thorin wrote:

Jules wrote:

No, Thorins post struck a cord simply cos I remember that Tommy's priorities during the endless discussions about Jo Cox's murder seemed all wrong too. I would have agreed with whoever had said it, not just Thorin!

And why don't you take a break from saying ''tag teaming, tag teaming'' all the time, like a stuck record?    Accept that people will sometimes agree with each other. You yourself are certainly NOT  above jumping in to stick the boot into someone who is ALREADY being lambasted in a thread, or laughing spitefully at them, Ragga. Some of us have long memories!  

I think I've only made 2 posts in this thread so far, and I will leave you to it now, as you seem to have the time, energy and inclination for these endless arguments. I don't. Cheerio.

Spot on Jules, its the constant fake victim card played, when they spout their bigotry, as a defense.

Raggamuffin wrote:

Jules wrote:

No, Thorins post struck a cord simply cos I remember that Tommy's priorities during the endless discussions about Jo Cox's murder seemed all wrong too. I would have agreed with whoever had said it, not just Thorin!

And why don't you take a break from saying ''tag teaming, tag teaming'' all the time, like a stuck record?    Accept that people will sometimes agree with each other. You yourself are certainly NOT  above jumping in to stick the boot into someone who is ALREADY being lambasted in a thread, or laughing spitefully at them, Ragga. Some of us have long memories!  

I think I've only made 2 posts in this thread so far, and I will leave you to it now, as you seem to have the time, energy and inclination for these endless arguments. I don't. Cheerio.

the trouble with people like you, Didge, and Andy is that you're obsessed with people "condemning" this and "condemning" that. There's not much point in a thread where everyone just says - oh, how awful, the bastards - is there?

You do tag-team, and you're always looking for approval and support - a bit like Didge.

You certainly don't have a long memory. Remember how I used to stick up for the someone because she was being harangued? Well I do the same here, whether you like it or not.

Oh, and it's your mate, Didge, who is carrying it on with his endless trolling, and it's your mate, Andy, who is lying and being a twat. Do remember to "tell them off", won't you?

Thorin wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

Andy was abusive, and you're trolling him and abusing him.

Again what abuse my me to tommy?

So again you class criticism as abuse

Hallmarks of sharia law on blasphemy.

Show me, this abuse and what did you say about controlling the forum?

Charging people with trolling?

If you think I have broken the rules, then report me, if not, your words are empty and meaningless.

Raggamuffin wrote:

Thorin wrote:


Spot on Jules, its the constant fake victim card played, when they spout their bigotry, as a defense.

Tag-teaming again Didge? Jules will love you for ever.

Tommy Monk wrote:The way the media reported this attack led huge numbers of people to assume the attackers were white british racist thugs... and a big part of this was due to the clear mention of the pub and the suggestion that the attackers may have come from there...!


I said very early on that I didn't believe the attackers were white british who had come from that pub!!!


I was attacked and accused of defending far right thugs etc...


So who are the real racists here...!?


Those who automatically assumed the attackers were white racist thugs...!?


Or me for saying I didn't believe that attackers were white british as the media reports suggested...!?

Thorin wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

the trouble with people like you, Didge, and Andy is that you're obsessed with people "condemning" this and "condemning" that. There's not much point in a thread where everyone just says - oh, how awful, the bastards - is there?

You do tag-team, and you're always looking for approval and support - a bit like Didge.

You certainly don't have a long memory. Remember how I used to stick up for the someone because she was being harangued? Well I do the same here, whether you like it or not.

Oh, and it's your mate, Didge, who is carrying it on with his endless trolling, and it's your mate, Andy, who is lying and being a twat. Do remember to "tell them off", won't you?

How is it obsessed, when simple asking someone to condemn a horrible attack and that person refuses to?

You are now again directing how the forum should be run and defending people from any criticism.

There is no such rules and if you cannot take criticism

Then tough

Thorin wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

Tag-teaming again Didge? Jules will love you for ever.

You just proved Jules right lol

Thanks

Raggamuffin wrote:

Thorin wrote:


Again what abuse my me to tommy?

So again you class criticism as abuse

Hallmarks of sharia law on blasphemy.

Show me, this abuse and what did you say about controlling the forum?

Charging people with trolling?

If you think I have broken the rules, then report me, if not, your words are empty and meaningless.

Why are you bringing Sharia law into this? Are you going to start ranting about Muslims yet again?

Raggamuffin wrote:

Thorin wrote:


How is it obsessed, when simple asking someone to condemn a horrible attack and that person refuses to?

You are now again directing how the forum should be run and defending people from any criticism.

There is no such rules and if you cannot take criticism

Then tough

It's your own thread you've trolled - knock yourself out. Self-sabotage is your thing isn't it?

Raggamuffin wrote:

Thorin wrote:


You just proved Jules right lol

Thanks

I've just proved that you're a tag-teamer.

Thorin wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

Why are you bringing Sharia law into this? Are you going to start ranting about Muslims yet again?

As you are acting like some Islamists, trying to criminalize criticism, by claiming criticism is abuse

Which as seen you failed to produce any evidence

Like I said and easily showed your words are empty and meaningless

Thanks for proving me right again

Thorin wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

I've just proved that you're a tag-teamer.

That you have the term on the brain lol, proving Jules right

Raggamuffin wrote:

Thorin wrote:


As you are acting like some Islamists, trying to criminalize criticism, by claiming criticism is abuse

Which as seen you failed to produce any evidence

Like I said and easily showed your words are empty and meaningless

Thanks for proving me right again

Here we go - you're displaying your bigotry again. Any excuse to have a go at Muslims eh?

You're always abusive - you don't know how else to be.

Raggamuffin wrote:

Thorin wrote:


That you have the term on the brain lol, proving Jules right

Well if you and her keep doing, I'll keep pointing it out ...

Tommy Monk wrote:The way the media reported this attack led huge numbers of people to assume the attackers were white british racist thugs... and a big part of this was due to the clear mention of the pub and the suggestion that the attackers may have come from there...!


I said very early on that I didn't believe the attackers were white british who had come from that pub!!!


I was attacked and accused of defending far right thugs etc...


So who are the real racists here...!?


Those who automatically assumed the attackers were white racist thugs...!?


Or me for saying I didn't believe that attackers were white british as the media reports suggested...!?

Thorin wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

Here we go - you're displaying your bigotry again. Any excuse to have a go at Muslims eh?

You're always abusive - you don't know how else to be.

I said Islamists who are trying to criminalize criticism of Islam

So how is that abusive, to point this out?

Hilarity ensues again from Rags

Thorin wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

Well if you and her keep doing, I'll keep pointing it out ...

Keep doing?

lol, are you claiming we are lovers as well.

Blimey I get around  

Raggamuffin wrote:

Thorin wrote:


I said Islamists who are trying to criminalize criticism of Islam

So how is that abusive, to point this out?

Hilarity ensues again from Rags

As I said, any excuse to have a go at Muslims - you're such a racist bigot.

Thorin wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

As I said, any excuse to have a go at Muslims - you're such a racist bigot.

So criticism is again abuse to you and having a go?

http://www.newsfixboard.com/t20194-move-to-devise-Muslim-world-plan-against-blasphemous-content

What next, that is wrong to condemn Muslim women being stoned to death for adultery.

Is that having a go at Muslims Rags?

eddie wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

Thorin wrote:


So criticism is again abuse to you and having a go?

http://www.newsfixboard.com/t20194-move-to-devise-Muslim-world-plan-against-blasphemous-content

What next, that is wrong to condemn Muslim women being stoned to death for adultery.

Is that having a go at Muslims Rags?

And he's off - changing the subject to Muslims - again. It's never long before you do that is it?

Thorin wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

And he's off - changing the subject to Muslims - again. It's never long before you do that is it?

I was just easily reasoning that you are comparable to islamists based off criminalizing criticism, which you cast as abuse.



How is it racist to be critical of some Muslims by the way?

Hilarity ensues again from Rags

Raggamuffin wrote:

Thorin wrote:


I was just easily reasoning that you are comparable to islamists based off criminalizing criticism, which you cast as abuse.



How is it racist to be critical of some Muslims by the way?

Hilarity ensues again from Rags

Well you think it's antisemitic to merely point out some facts about some Zionists, so ...

Thorin wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

And he's off - changing the subject to Muslims - again. It's never long before you do that is it?

I was just easily reasoning that you are comparable to islamists based off criminalizing criticism, which you cast as abuse.



How is it racist to be critical of some Muslims by the way?

Hilarity ensues again from Rags

Thorin wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

Well you think it's antisemitic to merely point out some facts about some Zionists, so ...

No I do not think is antisemitic to be critical of Zionism

But claiming Hitler supported Zionism, as a defense of an MP wishing to ethnically cleanse Israel of Jews, is about as antisemitic as it gets

Tommy Monk wrote:

Thorin wrote:


I was just easily reasoning that you are comparable to islamists based off criminalizing criticism, which you cast as abuse.



How is it racist to be critical of some Muslims by the way?

Hilarity ensues again from Rags

Well... according to you... if they can't speak English and you say that they can't speak English... then that is 'racist'!!!

Tommy Monk wrote:

Thorin wrote:


I was just easily reasoning that you are comparable to islamists based off criminalizing criticism, which you cast as abuse.



How is it racist to be critical of some Muslims by the way?

Hilarity ensues again from Rags

Well... according to you... if they can't speak English and you say that they can't speak English... then that is 'racist'!!!

Raggamuffin wrote:

Thorin wrote:


No I do not think is antisemitic to be critical of Zionism

But claiming Hitler supported Zionism, as a defense of an MP wishing to ethnically cleanse Israel of Jews, is about as antisemitic as it gets

No it's not - not by any stretch of the imagination. He didn't say that anyway.

You defend the killing of Palestinians, so by your own logic, you wish to ethnically cleanse Israel of Palestinians.

Raggamuffin wrote:I see that Didge has forgotten all about the poor chap who was nearly killed, and he'd prefer to talk about Muslims.

Raggamuffin wrote:

Tommy Monk wrote:


Well... according to you... if they can't speak English and you say that they can't speak English... then that is 'racist'!!!

How can it be racist to point out that someone doesn't speak English?

Tommy Monk wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

How can it be racist to point out that someone doesn't speak English?

Didge has said that earlier on this thread...!




I think his knickers are getting so twisted that it's cutting off the blood flow to his brain!!!

Tommy Monk wrote:
"...Yeah sorry,shrublands is a wonderful place( if you forget about the gangs,drugs,fights,p
eople who can't speak English,nappies thrown out of windows,vandalism ands tonnes of litter everywhere )..."