Winston McKenzi - Homo Comment

sassy wrote:

Didge wrote:Oh here we go, Mrs Prude of the year award forn the last two decades says now its wrong to talk about anaal sex when at no point did I ask Rags if she had anal sex but oral sex off the back of people being blatantly pathetic about homosexuals.
But do not allow that point to get in the way of you shit stirring yet again sassy.

Quelle suprise

Its a debate and if a person has had oral sex, then there view on anal sex and the purpose of body parts is very relevant.

The last thing I am is prudish (as Vic and Zack will testify to after last night lol).  And I will discuss any aspect of sex.  But you are not discussing sex, you are asking Rags to give you very private information.   Nobody has asked you if you have ever stuck your cock up an arse of any gender in order to discuss homsexuality and you should not be asking Rags this:

Re: Winston McKenzi - Homo Comment

 by Didge Today at 12:41 pm
=31f0bacf8630ddf77817e933af8cab87&cvf[1]=80fcd4facf75f7db88bbec8d606f6de5&eval=plus&p_vote=259031]+
----
=50055cce40f5687c8c283908cec294db&cvf[1]=f29ebb91ce0ab1027da4b60823089dbd&eval=minus&p_vote=259031]-

Raggamuffin wrote:


Mind your own business and stop asking me personal questions.

You think that people are claiming this was a hate crime just to contradict you - what a high opinion you have of yourself.

For the record, I said early on that it clearly wasn't a crime.

Well its important to understand whether are not you are being comepletely hypocritical if you have ever given blowjobs, because the mouth did not evolve to suck cock, but countless women love sucking cock, so its important to understand rags.



You have a track history of trying to find out about the sex lives of women on this board.

sassy wrote:

eddie wrote:

No you're wrong sassy. He was, (albeit on the wrong thread which I pointed out), asking her questions he'd asked her and storm on another thread where no one seemed to object.

I did point out, that had she reported him for "badgering her" I'd have asked him to stop because she had felt uncomfortable enough to report it (as had happened historically).
That wasn't the case this time.

I am not judging an action of the poster didge, on a past action.
That makes no fair sense at all.

I've already explained all this.

I disagree, when it is something that he does regularly, then the past should be taken into account and he SHOULD NOT be asking personal questions of any woman on here, the fact that he has done it before shows the intent.  Nobody has asked him personal questions to verify whether he has knowledge to talk about it.

Didge wrote:

sassy wrote:


The last thing I am is prudish (as Vic and Zack will testify to after last night lol).  And I will discuss any aspect of sex.  But you are not discussing sex, you are asking Rags to give you very private information.   Nobody has asked you if you have ever stuck your cock up an arse of any gender in order to discuss homsexuality and you should not be asking Rags this:

Re: Winston McKenzi - Homo Comment

 by Didge Today at 12:41 pm
=31f0bacf8630ddf77817e933af8cab87&cvf[1]=80fcd4facf75f7db88bbec8d606f6de5&eval=plus&p_vote=259031]+
----
=50055cce40f5687c8c283908cec294db&cvf[1]=f29ebb91ce0ab1027da4b60823089dbd&eval=minus&p_vote=259031]-



Well its important to understand whether are not you are being comepletely hypocritical if you have ever given blowjobs, because the mouth did not evolve to suck cock, but countless women love sucking cock, so its important to understand rags.



You have a track history of trying to find out about the sex lives of women on this board.

What is wrong with the above?

Is it in accurate?

And its to the point because the mouth did not evoleve to have oral sex did it but the vast majority of women are happ to do so, hence why it was important to ask this

Why is that wrong?

Please lets here your petty reasons as I am dying to know

eddie wrote:Sassy, if he'd made that post out of the blue with no relevance to any recent topic, I'd have said something.

I was witness to, as were you and others, that same topic and question being asked, very recently on another thread.

We all talk about sex, you included, quite blatently.

If a poster feels uncomfortable with the topic of graphic discussion involving sex, they can always refrain from reading and replying.

Don't take part if you are going to protest.

sassy wrote:

Didge wrote:


What is wrong with the above?

Is it in accurate?

And its to the point because the mouth did not evoleve to have oral sex did it but the vast majority of women are happ to do so, hence why it was important to ask this

Why is that wrong?

Please lets here your petty reasons as I am dying to know

Talk about blowjobs all you like.  Discuss whether it is better to spit or swallow I don't care.  But you do not have the right to ask such personal information of a woman FULL STOP.  To do so once is suspect, to do it a lot is bloody creepy.

Raggamuffin wrote:

eddie wrote:Sassy, if he'd made that post out of the blue with no relevance to any recent topic, I'd have said something.

I was witness to, as were you and others, that same topic and question being asked, very recently on another thread.

We all talk about sex, you included, quite blatently.

If a poster feels uncomfortable with the topic of graphic discussion involving sex, they can always refrain from reading and replying.

Don't take part if you are going to protest.

I was discussing the issue in a scientific way as to the function of a body part, which is very different to talking about sex. You could of course tell the sex pest to stop pestering rather than blame the person they're pestering.

eddie wrote:So stop blathering on and report it then.
Choose any admin you want.

I've advised you to, more than once.

If anyone on this thread has a real problem with a post or poster please feel free to report.

eddie wrote:So stop blathering on and report it then.
Choose any admin you want.

I've advised you to, more than once.

If anyone on this thread has a real problem with a post or poster please feel free to report.

Didge wrote:I have every right and you have been told already by Eddie if you do not like it tough, in fact I said near enough the same to rags, if she does not like being asked such questions then she should not engage in such debates where it is clear to me she was showing the worst double standards.
As you cannot make an argument claiming the use of a body part for sex is wrong if you use another one for sex for the same reason

Hence all you are doing sassy is defending those who are in reality anti-homosexual, which backs onto before what both eilzel and I have said about you how you defend the indefensible

I will be interested to see what Eilzel makes of this also

eddie wrote:Woah! You're both really getting way too far on this.

You're accusing a poster of being a "sex pest"

I am locking this thread to have it looked at.
I suggest you all report the posts you feel so strongly about.

You have both engaged in graphic (scientific??!!) discussion about sex with a man and now you don't like something he's said you call him a sex pest??

I am a woman and quite frankly, you're both using your very femaleness, against someone because it suits you.