Winston McKenzi - Homo Comment

Raggamuffin wrote:

Didge wrote:


lol you really have got yourself very upset

Suck it up crybaby

Seriously you are not fooling anyone buddy, the only thing that is evident is you are very backward holding very unscientific views, that discriminate, so best you take a leaf out of your own book and start being nice to others, as nobody has hardly said any abuse to you.

Grow up

You are not fooling people here

Stormee is a gentleman, and he's pulled you up for your sleazy questions. It's very good of him to do that.

Stormee wrote:Stop the constant name calling Didge.

Didge wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

Stormee is a gentleman, and he's pulled you up for your sleazy questions. It's very good of him to do that.

Who is racist and homophobic and you call that a gentleman, that is not a gentleman, but something that is nasty.

Raggamuffin wrote:

Didge wrote:


Who is racist and homophobic and you call that a gentleman, that is not a gentleman, but something that is nasty.

He is a gentleman. He stepped in to pull you up for your sleazy remarks. Not many people would do that.

Didge wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

He is a gentleman. He stepped in to pull you up for your sleazy remarks. Not many people would do that.

As Eddie already pointed out I have not been sexit, sleazy and you have a poor friend if you need racists and homophobes to defend you which is no surpirse rags, being as you are backward on the whole issue of sexuality

Seriously I am starting to laugh at the pair of your anticws, but please continue, as I know Allahakaka very well

Raggamuffin wrote:

Didge wrote:


As Eddie already pointed out I have not been sexit, sleazy and you have a poor friend if you need racists and homophobes to defend you which is no surpirse rags, being as you are backward on the whole issue of sexuality

Seriously I am starting to laugh at the pair of your anticws, but please continue, as I know Allahakaka very well

I don't agree with Eddie, as I just said. She might think that sort of question is fine, but I do not - as I told you several times.

It's not relevant whether you know Allawhatsit or not as he is not posting here.

Didge wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

I don't agree with Eddie, as I just said. She might think that sort of question is fine, but I do not - as I told you several times.

It's not relevant whether you know Allawhatsit or not as he is not posting here.

Well as you are a complete prude and have led a sheltered life clearly in the 19th century its no surpirse you would think such backward views.

No need to blame others for your own failings here Rags

It is relevant knowing very well what Pakistanley is like and he loves my nicknames for him\

Raggamuffin wrote:

Didge wrote:


Well as you are a complete prude and have led a sheltered life clearly in the 19th century its no surpirse you would think such backward views.

No need to blame others for your own failings here Rags

It is relevant knowing very well what Pakistanley is like and he loves my nicknames for him\

Not wanting to be asked sleazy questions or be harassed by a sex pest is not being a "prude". Keep your filthy questions to yourself.

You're also being racist.

Stormee wrote:Prove it Didge.

Raggamuffin wrote:

Stormee wrote:It is clearly sexual harassment from Didge, quite disgusting and nasty, just what you would expect from him.

Even worse is when management support him by their non condemnation.

No one with even a modicum of self respect would ask such a question.

Jusr imagine being in a pub and asking a female that question with her husband, fiancee within earshot.

I never ever thought I would see this filth on a forum which does not go down well.

Thank you Stormee. I also don't think it's enough to say that I don't have to answer. I had already asked him to stop questioning me, and he carried on.

eddie wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

Thank you Stormee. I also don't think it's enough to say that I don't have to answer. I had already asked him to stop questioning me, and he carried on.

Ah stop. You're killing me.

Both of you have been involved in topics where sex was being discussed, storm you more so than rags, have used basic and filthy language so give it up like a dog with a meatless bone.
There's no meat so stop licking the bone for dog's sake.

Raggamuffin wrote:

eddie wrote:


Ah stop. You're killing me.

Both of you have been involved in topics where sex was being discussed, storm you more so than rags, have used basic and filthy language so give it up like a dog with a meatless bone.
There's no meat so stop licking the bone for dog's sake.

That doesn't give someone the right to ask me personal questions and become a pest about it. If you like men to be pervy with you, just say so, and that will clear things up.

Didge wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

That doesn't give someone the right to ask me personal questions and become a pest about it. If you like men to be pervy with you, just say so, and that will clear things up.

As seen nobody is buying your fake victimhood, so best you learn to move on and stop being a petulant silly girl.

Raggamuffin wrote:

Didge wrote:


As seen nobody is buying your fake victimhood, so best you learn to move on and stop being a petulant silly girl.

If you try anything like that again, you will disrupt whole threads because I won't put up with it. I'm not the only one on here who isn't impressed with your perving.

Raggamuffin wrote:

eddie wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

Thank you Stormee. I also don't think it's enough to say that I don't have to answer. I had already asked him to stop questioning me, and he carried on.

Ah stop. You're killing me.

Both of you have been involved in topics where sex was being discussed, storm you more so than rags, have used basic and filthy language so give it up like a dog with a meatless bone.
There's no meat so stop licking the bone for dog's sake.

That doesn't give someone the right to ask me personal questions and become a pest about it. If you like men to be pervy with you, just say so, and that will clear things up.

Didge wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

If you try anything like that again, you will disrupt whole threads because I won't put up with it. I'm not the only one on here who isn't impressed with your perving.

So silly immature threats now lol

Behave, like I say, you are about as scary as a hamster, learn to move on and will ask question which are very relevant to the thread, if you do not want them asked, then best you do not get involved in conversations which may arise them coming up.

Simple really is it not Rags?

eddie wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

That doesn't give someone the right to ask me personal questions and become a pest about it. If you like men to be pervy with you, just say so, and that will clear things up.

I didn't think he was being Pervy and I've had many debates with posters where sex has been discussed.
I don't mind blunt language. I'd have thought you'd be the same as you're very forthright in every single other area.

Being Pervy is different than being asked a blunt question in a debate.

If I thought for one moment he was being perverted, do you not think I'd have said something to him? Didge and I are not afraid to lock horns!!
The questions was relevant to a topic (albeit not on the one you were both on at the time of the comments).

Having said that rags, if you feel that I didn't handle the comments to your liking there's nothing stopping you from reporting them to another admin.
Please feel free to do so.

Raggamuffin wrote:

Didge wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

If you try anything like that again, you will disrupt whole threads because I won't put up with it. I'm not the only one on here who isn't impressed with your perving.

So silly immature threats now lol

Behave, like I say, you are about as scary as a hamster, learn to move on and will ask question which are very relevant to the thread, if you do not want them asked, then best you do not get involved in conversations which may arise them coming up.

Simple really is it not Rags?

No, I won't put up with your perving, so it's best if you don't do it again. Eddie might enjoy being pestered but I don't.

Raggamuffin wrote:

eddie wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

That doesn't give someone the right to ask me personal questions and become a pest about it. If you like men to be pervy with you, just say so, and that will clear things up.

I didn't think he was being Pervy and I've had many debates with posters where sex has been discussed.
I don't mind blunt language. I'd have thought you'd be the same as you're very forthright in every single other area.

Being Pervy is different than being asked a blunt question in a debate.

If I thought for one moment he was being perverted, do you not think I'd have said something to him? Didge and I are not afraid to lock horns!!
The questions was relevant to a topic (albeit not on the one you were both on at the time of the comments).

Having said that rags, if you feel that I didn't handle the comments to your liking there's nothing stopping you from reporting them to another admin.
Please feel free to do so.

Well you wouldn't think so because you like that kind of thing. I don't though, and you're supposed to be a moderator.

Raggamuffin wrote:

Didge wrote:


So silly immature threats now lol

Behave, like I say, you are about as scary as a hamster, learn to move on and will ask question which are very relevant to the thread, if you do not want them asked, then best you do not get involved in conversations which may arise them coming up.

Simple really is it not Rags?

No, I won't put up with your perving, so it's best if you don't do it again. Eddie might enjoy being pestered but I don't.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Lord Foul wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

No, I won't put up with your perving, so it's best if you don't do it again. Eddie might enjoy being pestered but I don't.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

eddie wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

Well you wouldn't think so because you like that kind of thing. I don't though, and you're supposed to be a moderator.

Yes I dint get bothered by that kind of thing, you're right. I am not put  off by nitty gritty debate.


It's all spunk off a slut's back to me.

Raggamuffin wrote:

eddie wrote:


Yes I dint get bothered by that kind of thing, you're right. I am not put  off by nitty gritty debate.


It's all spunk off a slut's back to me.

Well that's fairly clear - you like to talk like a slut, and you like men to be sex pests. No worries - I'll deal with it myself.

Didge wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

Well that's fairly clear - you like to talk like a slut, and you like men to be sex pests. No worries - I'll deal with it myself.

Well below the belt, not the broightest move I must say.
You seriously need to grow up rags and when I mean you are a petulant girl you certainly are

Didge wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

eddie wrote:


Yes I dint get bothered by that kind of thing, you're right. I am not put  off by nitty gritty debate.


It's all spunk off a slut's back to me.

Well that's fairly clear - you like to talk like a slut, and you like men to be sex pests. No worries - I'll deal with it myself.

Well below the belt, not the broightest move I must say.
You seriously need to grow up rags and when I mean you are a petulant girl you certainly are

eddie wrote:

Didge wrote:


Well below the belt, not the broightest move I must say.
You seriously need to grow up rags and when I mean you are a petulant girl you certainly are

It doesn't bother me. Rags has a temper and a quick mouth.
I've heard worse.

Raggamuffin wrote:

Didge wrote:


Well below the belt, not the broightest move I must say.
You seriously need to grow up rags and when I mean you are a petulant girl you certainly are

Ooooh, why? What are you going to do about it? Go running to admin again?

Lord Foul wrote:dont tell me ragga


your going to .......
thcream and thcream until youre thick

"just william"

"Other recurring characters include Violet Elizabeth Bott, lisping spoiled daughter of the local nouveau riche millionaire (whose companionship William reluctantly endures, to prevent her carrying out her threat "I'll thcream and thcream 'till I'm thick"), and......................."

eddie wrote:Well I'm not reporting her to myself

At least we know what she thinks.

Didge wrote:

eddie wrote:Well I'm not reporting her to myself

At least we know what she thinks.

Which makes you the better person which is all that matters really Eddie.

The thing that made me laugh is for the last few hours its been this non-stop fake victimhood around me being a pervert but she has no problem saying "you talk like a s##t".
Its the hypocrisy that is staggering

Lord Foul wrote:why raggaviolet? cos you amuses me
and the madder you get the more irrational you are

ant the more irrational you are the more amusing you are

eddie wrote:Well I'm not reporting her to myself

At least we know what she thinks.

Lord Foul wrote:why raggaviolet? cos you amuses me
and the madder you get the more irrational you are

ant the more irrational you are the more amusing you are

sassy wrote:

eddie wrote:Well I'm not reporting her to myself

At least we know what she thinks.

Have to say Eddie, when Didge was asking women before if they had had anal sex you were not very happy about it.  And I fail to see why discussing homosexuality in general, requires Didge to ask particular women if they had ever had oral or anal sex.   I think you are forgetting that Didge has a history of this, and the last time ALL the women on the board were up in arms.

Discuss anything, there is nothing about sex that cannot be discussed.  Asking personal questions of particular posters and making out they are prudish if they don't want to answer is something you came down on last time.

Didge wrote:Oh here we go, Mrs Prude of the year award forn the last two decades says now its wrong to talk about anaal sex when at no point did I ask Rags if she had anal sex but oral sex off the back of people being blatantly pathetic about homosexuals.
But do not allow that point to get in the way of you shit stirring yet again sassy.

Quelle suprise

Its a debate and if a person has had oral sex, then there view on anal sex and the purpose of body parts is very relevant.

Re: Winston McKenzi - Homo Comment

Raggamuffin wrote:

Didge wrote:


Soory but can we have that translated to make any sort of sense please?

You see now I know you are completely wound up, you are making comments in the nain attempt to goad, which fails badly everytime

Still waiting to know if you have ever had oral sex as well, and why you think humans are designed?

Mind your own business and stop asking me personal questions.

You think that people are claiming this was a hate crime just to contradict you - what a high opinion you have of yourself.

For the record, I said early on that it clearly wasn't a crime.

eddie wrote:

sassy wrote:


Have to say Eddie, when Didge was asking women before if they had had anal sex you were not very happy about it.  And I fail to see why discussing homosexuality in general, requires Didge to ask particular women if they had ever had oral or anal sex.   I think you are forgetting that Didge has a history of this, and the last time ALL the women on the board were up in arms.

Discuss anything, there is nothing about sex that cannot be discussed.  Asking personal questions of particular posters and making out they are prudish if they don't want to answer is something you came down on last time.

No you're wrong sassy. He was, (albeit on the wrong thread which I pointed out), asking her questions he'd asked her and storm on another thread where no one seemed to object.

I did point out, that had she reported him for "badgering her" I'd have asked him to stop because she had felt uncomfortable enough to report it (as had happened historically).
That wasn't the case this time.

I am not judging an action of the poster didge, on a past action.
That makes no fair sense at all.

I've already explained all this.

Raggamuffin wrote:

Lord Foul wrote:why raggaviolet? cos you amuses me
and the madder you get the more irrational you are

ant the more irrational you are the more amusing you are

It's pity that you're not more amusing. Try a little harder.

eddie wrote:

sassy wrote:


Have to say Eddie, when Didge was asking women before if they had had anal sex you were not very happy about it.  And I fail to see why discussing homosexuality in general, requires Didge to ask particular women if they had ever had oral or anal sex.   I think you are forgetting that Didge has a history of this, and the last time ALL the women on the board were up in arms.

Discuss anything, there is nothing about sex that cannot be discussed.  Asking personal questions of particular posters and making out they are prudish if they don't want to answer is something you came down on last time.

No you're wrong sassy. He was, (albeit on the wrong thread which I pointed out), asking her questions he'd asked her and storm on another thread where no one seemed to object.

I did point out, that had she reported him for "badgering her" I'd have asked him to stop because she had felt uncomfortable enough to report it (as had happened historically).
That wasn't the case this time.

I am not judging an action of the poster didge, on a past action.
That makes no fair sense at all.

I've already explained all this.