Refugee Refuses High Rise Flat - Takes Council To Court - Can't Speak Any English

First topic message reminder :

7th March 2014

Who gave this non-English-speaking REFUGEE the idea that she can take the council to court???

Due to give birth too - how timely.

A refugee took a council to the High Court when she turned down their offer of a high rise council house claiming she was scared of heights. Somalian Naima Mohamoud, who does not speak any English, claims she is separated from her husband and said she was thrown out of friend's house when she told them she was due to give birth. She applied for council accommodation and signed a form agreeing that if she refused an offer of a home she would not get another. Ms Mahamoud was given the chance to move into a tower block, by Birmingham City Council.


http://www.courtnewsuk.co.uk/newsgallery/#sthash.01Mhvqns.dpuf

Dear me, that again is not equality, because you still have people in homes, which matters little because you said she "should" be made homeless


DOH

So thanks again for proving you have no Christian values

PhilDidge wrote:Dear me, that again is not equality, because you still have people in homes, which matters little because you said she "should" be made homeless


DOH

So thanks again for proving you have no Christian values  

really, if the rules apply to all that is quite simply and quite obviously equality...herr dicktator..

Bless, the worm still tries pathetically to get out of what he said


Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha

Game over

PhilDidge wrote:Bless, the worm still tries pathetically to get out of what he said


Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha

Game over

what!!!!

everyone has the same rules, is that equality...  

this is not about morality herr dicktator...  

A Ugandan benefit fraudster who stole £4million from the British taxpayer is claiming  asylum because of the disgrace she faces if she was sent home.
Ruth Nabuguzi is insisting that relatives are angry at the shame she has brought on them through her criminal activities here.
Nabuguzi was accused of an ‘outrageous abuse of the hospitality’ shown to her by Britain when she – along with a gang of other fraudsters – was convicted of  stealing more than £4.1million from taxpayers.
The 20-year scam saw her gang create fake identities for up to 100 children to milk the benefits system.
She was yesterday ordered by a judge to pay back £1.5million of the money she stole or face having her six-year jail sentence doubled.
Nabuguzi had also claimed to have HIV and Aids to receive costly drugs which she then sent back to Uganda to be sold to genuine victims at a huge profit.
It was estimated that supplying the medicines to her, as well as four other made-up patients, cost the taxpayer more than £2million.
Now, in a further twist to her case, the Daily Mail has learned that Nabuguzi plans to make an asylum application in a bid to halt deportation. When she was jailed in November 2012 she was told that she would be kicked out of the country.



http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2580527/Demanding-asylum-4-million-Ugandan-benefits-cheat-claimed-100-fake-children-Fraudster-says-return-home-disgrace-faces.html#ixzz2vvhAIhef

Wow, is this your evidence?
Another case of extreme examples?

bravo

An example of an asylum claimant.

Tommy Monk wrote:An example of an asylum claimant.

and an excellent example too...

Tommy Monk wrote:An example of an asylum claimant.

agree

Yes an example of a criminal caught out now trying to seek asylum.

Does that represent many who seek asylum?

No, that shows the desperation of some using a fallacy argument, I suggest if you do not understand what that means, look it up

PhilDidge wrote:Yes an example of a criminal caught out now trying to seek asylum.

Does that represent many who seek asylum?

No, that shows the desperation of some using a fallacy argument, I suggest if you do not understand what that means, look it up

did you ask for a specific case or a specific number...  

perhaps you should try to make yourself a little more clear in future..  

Godisgoodallthetime wrote:

PhilDidge wrote:Yes an example of a criminal caught out now trying to seek asylum.

Does that represent many who seek asylum?

No, that shows the desperation of some using a fallacy argument, I suggest if you do not understand what that means, look it up

did you ask for a specific case or a specific number...  

perhaps you should try to make yourself a little more clear in future..  

I think that is your requirement not mine, the insinuations is being made by posters that asylum seekers come here to take the piss, by posting the extreme cases where this happens does not provide viable evidence that many do, it shows a small amount do, thus rendering all such arguments as poor as this is all they can go off the back of. I doubt you will understand this as it as your intellect has not passed 5 years old yet

All asylum claimants try to use asylum as a way of getting to stay in our country.
75% of asylum claimants aren't turned down because they are genuine!
And even then they are mostly not deported.
The system is a joke and wide open to abuse.

PhilDidge wrote:

Godisgoodallthetime wrote:

did you ask for a specific case or a specific number...  

perhaps you should try to make yourself a little more clear in future..  

I think that is your requirement not mine, the insinuations is being made by posters that asylum seekers come here to take the piss, by posting the extreme cases where this happens does not provide viable evidence that many do, it shows a small amount do, thus rendering all such arguments as poor as this is all they can go off the back of. I doubt you will understand this as it as your intellect has not passed 5 years old yet

and you do not consider someone who robs the country of over 4 million in benefits then requests asylum here is taking the piss..  

Godisgoodallthetime wrote:

PhilDidge wrote:



I think that is your requirement not mine, the insinuations is being made by posters that asylum seekers come here to take the piss, by posting the extreme cases where this happens does not provide viable evidence that many do, it shows a small amount do, thus rendering all such arguments as poor as this is all they can go off the back of. I doubt you will understand this as it as your intellect has not passed 5 years old yet

and you do not consider someone who robs the country of over 4 million in benefits then requests asylum here is taking the piss..  

i suggest you read back as answered this, hilarious, I stated she was a criminal and this was an extreme example proving again you are very dim and do not read anything ha ha ha ha ha, why you are some mild irritant when debating, because you are so much of a dummy.

I like the fact you think you can wind up people but it always backfires with me and you end up getting wound up yourself as you did again yesterday on this thread, was hilarious

 

PhilDidge wrote:

Godisgoodallthetime wrote:

and you do not consider someone who robs the country of over 4 million in benefits then requests asylum here is taking the piss..  

i suggest you read back as answered this, hilarious, I stated she was a criminal and this was an extreme example proving again you are very dim and do not read anything ha ha ha ha ha, why you are some mild irritant when debating, because you are so much of a dummy.

I like the fact you think you can wind up people but it always backfires with me and you end up getting wound up yourself as you did again yesterday on this thread, was hilarious

 

lol make your mind up, oh you have to have a mind to make up...

it was given , not by me by the way, as an example of an asylum seeker who was taking the piss, In my opinion it is a very good example of just that...  

I could be wrong but i guess about now didge will declare itself the winner of the debate, it likes doing that...lol

  

Godisgoodallthetime wrote:

PhilDidge wrote:



i suggest you read back as answered this, hilarious, I stated she was a criminal and this was an extreme example proving again you are very dim and do not read anything ha ha ha ha ha, why you are some mild irritant when debating, because you are so much of a dummy.

I like the fact you think you can wind up people but it always backfires with me and you end up getting wound up yourself as you did again yesterday on this thread, was hilarious

 

lol make your mind up, oh you have to have a mind to make up...

it was given , not by me by the way, as an example of an asylum seeker who was taking the piss, In my opinion it is a very good example of just that...  

Make my mind up, PMSL again, already was clear, you just are not that bright on the up take, seems to take you 20 posts just to understand.

Ha Ha Ha Ha

PhilDidge wrote:

Godisgoodallthetime wrote:

lol make your mind up, oh you have to have a mind to make up...

it was given , not by me by the way, as an example of an asylum seeker who was taking the piss, In my opinion it is a very good example of just that...  

Make my mind up, PMSL again, already was clear, you just are not that bright on the up take, seems to take you 20 posts just to understand.

Ha Ha Ha Ha

i see an example of someone who has been caught ripping the country of for 4.1 million pounds requesting asylum from the country they have ripped off...  

in what world would that not be an excellent example of an asylum seeker taking the piss..  

Godisgoodallthetime wrote:

PhilDidge wrote:



Make my mind up, PMSL again, already was clear, you just are not that bright on the up take, seems to take you 20 posts just to understand.

Ha Ha Ha Ha

i see an example of someone who has been caught ripping the country of for 4.1 million pounds requesting asylum from the country they have ripped off...  

in what world would that not be an excellent example of an asylum seeker taking the piss..  

It is an extreme example, out of the thousands  that have claimed asylum, can you show many more doing the same?

If not then it would be an extreme example

PhilDidge wrote:

Godisgoodallthetime wrote:

i see an example of someone who has been caught ripping the country of for 4.1 million pounds requesting asylum from the country they have ripped off...  

in what world would that not be an excellent example of an asylum seeker taking the piss..  

It is an extreme example, out of the thousands  that have claimed asylum, can you show many more doing the same?

If not then it would be an extreme example

again did you ask for a specific case or a specific number...  

how many would you take as proof ...  

PhilDidge wrote:

Godisgoodallthetime wrote:

i see an example of someone who has been caught ripping the country of for 4.1 million pounds requesting asylum from the country they have ripped off...  

in what world would that not be an excellent example of an asylum seeker taking the piss..  

It is an extreme example, out of the thousands  that have claimed asylum, can you show many more doing the same?

If not then it would be an extreme example

I suppose those who have committed murder or rape and then claimed asylum aren't extreme???

There have been a few of those posted by Andy. The number of bogus asylum seekers is too high. By bogus I mean first and foremost those who cross sevral countries to get to us and then destroy their passports. Of course if you think that's OK then let's all pick up the bill with a smile on our faces.

kevins58 wrote:

PhilDidge wrote:



It is an extreme example, out of the thousands  that have claimed asylum, can you show many more doing the same?

If not then it would be an extreme example

I suppose those who have committed murder or rape and then claimed asylum aren't extreme???

There have been a few of those posted by Andy. The number of bogus asylum seekers is too high. By bogus I mean first and foremost those who cross sevral countries to get to us and then destroy their passports. Of course if you think that's OK then let's all pick up the bill with a smile on our faces.

very well said...

kevins58 wrote:

PhilDidge wrote:



It is an extreme example, out of the thousands  that have claimed asylum, can you show many more doing the same?

If not then it would be an extreme example

I suppose those who have committed murder or rape and then claimed asylum aren't extreme???

There have been a few of those posted by Andy. The number of bogus asylum seekers is too high. By bogus I mean first and foremost those who cross sevral countries to get to us and then destroy their passports. Of course if you think that's OK then let's all pick up the bill with a smile on our faces.

Are they again extreme examples Kevin?

Again it is not against the international law either to travel through nations to seek asylum, you need to keep up with the debate

So you should be able to back up your claims to show if any are bogus, by bogus, there is no such thing as a bogus asylum seeker, you do understand this, you also would need to show this is the norm, where killing and raping happen with asylum seekers?

Take your time, but please do not print news articles on individuals, as I will rip apart and insult such stupidity  

Good luck

kevins58 wrote:

PhilDidge wrote:

Godisgoodallthetime wrote:

i see an example of someone who has been caught ripping the country of for 4.1 million pounds requesting asylum from the country they have ripped off...  

in what world would that not be an excellent example of an asylum seeker taking the piss..  

It is an extreme example, out of the thousands  that have claimed asylum, can you show many more doing the same?

If not then it would be an extreme example

I suppose those who have committed murder or rape and then claimed asylum aren't extreme???

There have been a few of those posted by Andy. The number of bogus asylum seekers is too high. By bogus I mean first and foremost those who cross sevral countries to get to us and then destroy their passports. Of course if you think that's OK then let's all pick up the bill with a smile on our faces.

We have enough of our own home grown rip-off merchants and I include in that the bogus tax avoiders and tax evaders which costs the UK economy a damn site more than the benefit cheats.
Not really reflected in discussions being brought up here by some though is it? I suppose that because the Daily Mail doesn't really supply the required articles.

PhilDidge wrote:

kevins58 wrote:

I suppose those who have committed murder or rape and then claimed asylum aren't extreme???

There have been a few of those posted by Andy. The number of bogus asylum seekers is too high. By bogus I mean first and foremost those who cross sevral countries to get to us and then destroy their passports. Of course if you think that's OK then let's all pick up the bill with a smile on our faces.

Are they again extreme examples Kevin?

Again it is not against the international law either to travel through nations to seek asylum, you need to keep up with the debate

So you should be able to back up your claims to show if any are bogus, by bogus, there is no such thing as a bogus asylum seeker, you do understand this, you also would need to show this is the norm, where killing and raping happen with asylum seekers?

Take your time, but please do not print news articles on individuals, as I will rip apart and insult such stupidity  

Good luck

lol you couldn't take apart a lego house...  


you were supplied with what you requested an example of an asylum seeker taking the piss...  

Godisgoodallthetime wrote:

PhilDidge wrote:



Are they again extreme examples Kevin?

Again it is not against the international law either to travel through nations to seek asylum, you need to keep up with the debate

So you should be able to back up your claims to show if any are bogus, by bogus, there is no such thing as a bogus asylum seeker, you do understand this, you also would need to show this is the norm, where killing and raping happen with asylum seekers?

Take your time, but please do not print news articles on individuals, as I will rip apart and insult such stupidity  

Good luck

lol you couldn't take apart a lego house...  


you were supplied with what you requested an example of an asylum seeker taking the piss...  

Dear me, can someone explain to the dummy, that was not being argued or even asked for, as all this was is an extreme example 


DOH


Really is funny how stupid you are


But please do continue it makes my day


 

Irn Bru wrote:

kevins58 wrote:

I suppose those who have committed murder or rape and then claimed asylum aren't extreme???

There have been a few of those posted by Andy. The number of bogus asylum seekers is too high. By bogus I mean first and foremost those who cross sevral countries to get to us and then destroy their passports. Of course if you think that's OK then let's all pick up the bill with a smile on our faces.

We have enough of our own home grown rip-off merchants and I include in that the bogus tax avoiders and tax evaders which costs the UK economy a damn site more than the benefit cheats.
Not really reflected in discussions being brought up here by some though is it? I suppose that because the Daily Mail doesn't really supply the required articles.

That might be because the discussion here is about one asylum seeker who is a little bit picky about where she lives.

Start a new thread about tax if you want, but please don't change the course of threads.

PhilDidge wrote:

Godisgoodallthetime wrote:

lol you couldn't take apart a lego house...  


you were supplied with what you requested an example of an asylum seeker taking the piss...  

Dear me, can someone explain to the dummy, that was not being argued or even asked for, as all this was is an extreme example 


DOH


Really is funny how stupid you are


But please do continue it makes my day


 

lol when is an examle an extreme example??

is an extreme example not an example??  

BigAndy9 wrote:

Irn Bru wrote:

We have enough of our own home grown rip-off merchants and I include in that the bogus tax avoiders and tax evaders which costs the UK economy a damn site more than the benefit cheats.
Not really reflected in discussions being brought up here by some though is it? I suppose that because the Daily Mail doesn't really supply the required articles.

That might be because the discussion here is about one asylum seeker who is a little bit picky about where she lives.

Start a new thread about tax if you want, but please don't change the course of threads.

Well as you and others diverge on every topic you cannot answer that is funny.

The reality is all you ever post is extreme examples and cannot back up your views on asylum seekers

PhilDidge wrote:

BigAndy9 wrote:

That might be because the discussion here is about one asylum seeker who is a little bit picky about where she lives.

Start a new thread about tax if you want, but please don't change the course of threads.

Well as you and others diverge on every topic you cannot answer that is funny.

The reality is all you ever post is extreme examples and cannot back up your views on asylum seekers

Well the immigrant down the road who has never been in the news is hardly going to spark conversation on here is he?

BigAndy9 wrote:

PhilDidge wrote:



Well as you and others diverge on every topic you cannot answer that is funny.

The reality is all you ever post is extreme examples and cannot back up your views on asylum seekers

Well the immigrant down the road who has never been in the news is hardly going to spark conversation on here is he?

Eh

Immigrant now, I thought we were taking about asylum seekers, do you not know the difference now Andy?


Dear me

right have to go, Byeee

PhilDidge wrote:

BigAndy9 wrote:


Well the immigrant down the road who has never been in the news is hardly going to spark conversation on here is he?

Eh

Immigrant now, I thought we were taking about asylum seekers, do you not know the difference now Andy?


Dear me

right have to go, Byeee

So we won't be talking about the immigrant (Mr Patel) who lives down the road and was done for stealing £1 Million from the British taxpayer?

I'm very upset.

BigAndy9 wrote:

Irn Bru wrote:

kevins58 wrote:

I suppose those who have committed murder or rape and then claimed asylum aren't extreme???

There have been a few of those posted by Andy. The number of bogus asylum seekers is too high. By bogus I mean first and foremost those who cross sevral countries to get to us and then destroy their passports. Of course if you think that's OK then let's all pick up the bill with a smile on our faces.

We have enough of our own home grown rip-off merchants and I include in that the bogus tax avoiders and tax evaders which costs the UK economy a damn site more than the benefit cheats.
Not really reflected in discussions being brought up here by some though is it? I suppose that because the Daily Mail doesn't really supply the required articles.

That might be because the discussion here is about one asylum seeker who is a little bit picky about where she lives.

Start a new thread about tax if you want, but please don't change the course of threads.

You're dead right Andy. It's about 'one' asylum seeker.

Thank you.
Irn

Irn Bru wrote:

BigAndy9 wrote:

That might be because the discussion here is about one asylum seeker who is a little bit picky about where she lives.

Start a new thread about tax if you want, but please don't change the course of threads.

You're dead right Andy. It's about 'one' asylum seeker.

Thank you.
Irn

What - do you want 100 more? 1000?

How about 10,000? Take a look through my previous posts the past 4 years   

BigAndy9 wrote:

Irn Bru wrote:

BigAndy9 wrote:

That might be because the discussion here is about one asylum seeker who is a little bit picky about where she lives.

Start a new thread about tax if you want, but please don't change the course of threads.

You're dead right Andy. It's about 'one' asylum seeker.

Thank you.
Irn

What - do you want 100 more?  1000?

How about 10,000?  Take a look through my previous posts the past 4 years    

No, this thread is restricted to just one person who cheats the taxpayer.

That's what you appear to want.

back on topic, the bottom line is that for someone who is in dire need of a safe place to live she should have been grateful for the flat offered , beggars can't be choosers (normally)

VOD(original) wrote:back on topic, the bottom line is that for someone who is in dire need of a safe place to live she should have been grateful for the flat offered , beggars can't be choosers (normally)

Again that is gobbledygook, how can you be grateful for something that would place you into further distress?

There was nothing unreasonable about asking for alternative accommodation, I doubt you would have batted an eyelid if this was a white British Christian, but because it is someone who has fled persecution then it is wrong, even though both would suffer the same fear and the only difference being one born onto this part of the world

PhilDidge wrote:

kevins58 wrote:

I suppose those who have committed murder or rape and then claimed asylum aren't extreme???

There have been a few of those posted by Andy. The number of bogus asylum seekers is too high. By bogus I mean first and foremost those who cross sevral countries to get to us and then destroy their passports. Of course if you think that's OK then let's all pick up the bill with a smile on our faces.

Are they again extreme examples Kevin?

Again it is not against the international law either to travel through nations to seek asylum, you need to keep up with the debate

So you should be able to back up your claims to show if any are bogus, by bogus, there is no such thing as a bogus asylum seeker, you do understand this, you also would need to show this is the norm, where killing and raping happen with asylum seekers?

Take your time, but please do not print news articles on individuals, as I will rip apart and insult such stupidity  

Good luck

Rather you keep up. If asylum is what they seek the first country they come to that is safe is the one they should apply to. They come here because our benefits system is renowned for it's ease of access. They are supposed to announce themselves in the first safe country and the fact they destroy their documents is in my opinion a clear sign that they intend to defraud our system.  They are economic migrants not truly asylum seekers.

If they needed asylum country one would have done just fine. Truly are you are sure you are not a deep cover lefty?

kevins58 wrote:

PhilDidge wrote:



Are they again extreme examples Kevin?

Again it is not against the international law either to travel through nations to seek asylum, you need to keep up with the debate

So you should be able to back up your claims to show if any are bogus, by bogus, there is no such thing as a bogus asylum seeker, you do understand this, you also would need to show this is the norm, where killing and raping happen with asylum seekers?

Take your time, but please do not print news articles on individuals, as I will rip apart and insult such stupidity  

Good luck

Rather you keep up. If asylum is what they seek the first country they come to that is safe is the one they should apply to. They come here because our benefits system is renowned for it's ease of access. They are supposed to announce themselves in the first safe country and the fact they destroy their documents is in my opinion a clear sign that they intend to defraud our system.  They are economic migrants not truly asylum seekers.

If they needed asylum country one would have done just fine. Truly are you are sure you are not a deep cover lefty?

spot on

kevins58 wrote:

PhilDidge wrote:



Are they again extreme examples Kevin?

Again it is not against the international law either to travel through nations to seek asylum, you need to keep up with the debate

So you should be able to back up your claims to show if any are bogus, by bogus, there is no such thing as a bogus asylum seeker, you do understand this, you also would need to show this is the norm, where killing and raping happen with asylum seekers?

Take your time, but please do not print news articles on individuals, as I will rip apart and insult such stupidity  

Good luck

Rather you keep up. If asylum is what they seek the first country they come to that is safe is the one they should apply to. They come here because our benefits system is renowned for it's ease of access. They are supposed to announce themselves in the first safe country and the fact they destroy their documents is in my opinion a clear sign that they intend to defraud our system.  They are economic migrants not truly asylum seekers.

If they needed asylum country one would have done just fine. Truly are you are sure you are not a deep cover lefty?

Is it first country or have you decided it should be ignoring all these points already debating over other pages showing how poorly you fail to keep up with the debate.
Again you claim they come here for our benefit system when clearly here the woman in question did not even understand it showing how poor again your perception is or any real reality you are out of touch with. The reality is people flee persecution they know and grow up with a history of a nation that once ruled them knowing and thinking to them as being the only safe haven, they know little of other nations because this was not part of their history showing again how far out of touch with reality you are.

Not only that you fail to provide any evidence for this and again fail to understand there is no such thing as a bogus asylum seeker, as someone who seeks asylum is not bogus, whether we accept they have a right to stay is another matter but legally, they are not or seen as bogus. To judge they are solely off a prejudice you have shows how really out of touch you are with reality



What is a bogus asylum seeker?
There is no such thing as a bogus asylum seeker or an illegal asylum seeker. Everybody has a right to seek asylum in another country. People who don't qualify for protection as refugees will not receive refugee status and may be deported, but just because someone doesn't receive refugee status doesn't mean they are a bogus asylum seeker.
Let us remember that a bogus asylum-seeker is not equivalent to a criminal; and that an unsuccessful asylum application is not equivalent to a bogus one - Kofi Annan


So again this question has been asked before, present your evidence?
I think it is disgusting an individual like you can cast such a poor stereotype of a group of people who do come from nations that have conflict or people suffering persecution to then claim they are here for the benefits. Well if it is a benefit to have a better life away from persecution then there are here to benefit from that, which there is nothing wrong with. You think being born unto a piece of land gives you some profound right to being inhumane towards other people, sorry it does not


Are you sure you are a not Nazi?

Most asylum claims are baseless.

The claims are made just to try to stay in country and get luxury (to them compared to what they came from) accommodation and free money.

Tommy Monk wrote:Most asylum claims are baseless.

The claims are made just to try to stay in country and get luxury (to them compared to what they came from) accommodation and free money.

More assumptions based on your own opinion, even more so when I doubt you have even conversed with somebody seeking asylum from persecution, how would you know what real persecution is being as you live in Britain?
That is the reality and yet you then have to the cheek to judge many of them based off no real perception and also little knowledge of meeting any yourself and instead for your view completely based off reading some the media.
So do your claims stand up to scrutiny?

Not at all, they are formed from a prejudice and it is as simple as that

Good lord Didge, something we agree on!  :: 

Sassy wrote:Good lord Didge, something we agree on!  :: 

Hee Hee well everyone can find common ground on things

BigAndy9 wrote:7th March 2014

Who gave this non-English-speaking REFUGEE the idea that she can take the council to court???

Due to give birth too - how timely.
G
A refugee took a council to the High Court when she turned down their offer of a high rise council house claiming she was scared of heights. Somalian Naima Mohamoud, who does not speak any English, claims she is separated from her husband and said she was thrown out of friend's house when she told them she was due to give birth. She applied for council accommodation and signed a form agreeing that if she refused an offer of a home she would not get another. Ms Mahamoud was given the chance to move into a tower block, by Birmingham City Council.


http://www.courtnewsuk.co.uk/newsgallery/#sthash.01Mhvqns.dpuf

Andy, your ancestors were probably half Pakistani and half Russian, you said yourself there are a heap of black footballers in the England football team, many who have most likely been born here and English minded,so what's the big deal fella?

Live and let live chief.

Economic migrants and free loaders.
And allowed to continue abusing our good nature by the bleeding heart liberals who are quick to believe the bullshit churned out by these people.

Tommy Monk wrote:Economic migrants and free loaders.
And allowed to continue abusing our good nature by the bleeding heart liberals who are quick to believe the bullshit churned out by these people.

...life's all great if you lose the hate I say Tommy

Tommy Monk wrote:Economic migrants and free loaders.
And allowed to continue abusing our good nature by the bleeding heart liberals who are quick to believe the bullshit churned out by these people.

So this illogical view also places British migrants within the EU as the same then?

Again you base your views off prejudice hate. not anything viable, because the vast majority of EU migrants work, that is not abusing anything.

I said asylum seekers are mostly just economic migrants and free loaders.