Delivery man tells young boy to stop dressing as a fairy.

by Syl Wed Oct 05, 2016 7:09 pm

First topic message reminder :

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/mum-furious-after-son-wearing-8975210?ICID=FB_mirror_main

"Wendy, who also has a two-year-old daughter, Felicity, said she couldn't believe her ears.
She said: "If he had said it's unusual to be a fairy, we wouldn't have have thought too much of it but saying someone should take Isaac to one side implies he was doing something wrong.
"I feel disappointed that there are still people in this world that ask questions like that and and think it is their right to tell other people what they can and cannot wear.
"My son has been more reluctant to wear his fairy dress since, he has only worn it once or twice whereas he used to wear it all the time."

Obviously the delivery driver should have minded his own business, but should a 4 year old boy be encouraged to dress up as a fairy?

by Miffs2 Mon Oct 10, 2016 10:05 am

Eilzel wrote:
Miffs2 wrote:

Interesting that you wouldn't strive to keep yours safe. I am raising two kids, both of them are fantastic human beings. You should know, you met one.
When you have kids attending a UK comp then you get to flap your gums. It's all theory for you banging the keyboard and saving the world.

Since many who do have kids agree with me then I'll assume I have as much right to speak as you do, thanks.

Since my kid would be in my home I'd consider myself a bad father if I told him he couldn't wear a dress even if he wanted to.

And your boy is lovely. What I'm intereated in is if in the situation, would you tell him wearing a dress is wrong? And thus lead him to becoming transphobic- a point you clearly evaded.

My boy hasn't got it in him to any phobic , he is a big gentle giant with very long hair. He is a bit of a hippy incredibly sensitive and for a lad his age he shows great empathy.
His sister is the same (well, not a hippy with huge feet) but sensitive and driven to support any one bullied or marginalised. She has a sharp mind and a strong social conscience. I'm not doing the 'some of my best friends are black ' drivel that some do to support their point, but she attends a club for gay, lesbian and transgender kids and her prize possession is a black baseball cap with PRIDE in huge mirrored letters on the front. I won't let her wear it while on the night bus on her own though. Does that make us bigots ?

by Eilzel Mon Oct 10, 2016 10:26 am

No. And since you are deliberately avoiding the point I don't see any point in continuing this.

by Major Mon Oct 10, 2016 12:07 pm

IMHO some on here have sunk lower than a skunkz belly on this topic and have proved beyond any reasonable doubt they are not fit to have babiz of their own or be responsible for them.

A child is the most cherished possession possibul and our responsibility to give it every chance in life, NOT put it in a disadvantageous/perverse position.

'This thread' has clearly shown a trie picture of some.

In actual fact I reckon the trolls could be having a field day as no decent respectable individual could post in such a way.

Heaven help you.

by Eilzel Mon Oct 10, 2016 12:22 pm

I'd personally question anyone being a parent if they can't even string together coherent sentences in their native language.

by nicko Mon Oct 10, 2016 12:56 pm

IN CASE you haven't noticed, he does it on purpose.

Question, are you a teacher?

If so, what do you teach?

by Eilzel Mon Oct 10, 2016 1:11 pm

What has that got to do with anything?

And why does he do it then?

by Tommy Monk Mon Oct 10, 2016 1:37 pm

If he is teaching little boys that they should be wearing dresses then he should be arrested...

by Eilzel Mon Oct 10, 2016 1:45 pm

Imbecile.

by nicko Mon Oct 10, 2016 1:52 pm

Simple question, are you a teacher?

by Eilzel Mon Oct 10, 2016 1:59 pm

nicko wrote:Simple question, are you a teacher?

Yes, again, what has that to do with anything? We are not discussing me, stick to the issue.

Why do you think Major speaks like he's illiterate?

PS: I wasn't calling you an imbecile Wink

by eddie Mon Oct 10, 2016 2:24 pm

Major wrote:IMHO some on here have sunk lower than a skunkz belly on this topic and have proved beyond any reasonable doubt they are not fit to have babiz of their own or be responsible for them.

A child is the most cherished possession possibul and our responsibility to give it every chance in life, NOT put it in a disadvantageous/perverse position.

'This thread' has clearly shown a trie picture of some.

In actual fact I reckon the trolls could be having a field day as no decent respectable individual could post in such a way.

Heaven help you.

Why don't you shut up you whatless fuckwit?

by 'Wolfie Mon Oct 10, 2016 2:48 pm

Eilzel wrote:
I'd personally question anyone being a parent if they can't even string together coherent sentences in their native language.

NOT ONLY IS Major/Stormee the #1 "keyboard warrior" on this forum, he is also one of the leading trolls and spammers on here (and no real surprise that most of them have links through those couple of other infamous sites..).

WITH BOTH Major and Tommy, I often have to seriously wonder whether either of those nongs really have any children in real life..

AFTER ALL, can anyone actually believe that any decent and self-respecting woman would ever get involved with either of those weasels ?

LET ALONE consider breeding with them.. Suspect

by HoratioTarr Mon Oct 10, 2016 3:34 pm

Major wrote:IMHO some on here have sunk lower than a skunkz belly on this topic and have proved beyond any reasonable doubt they are not fit to have babiz of their own or be responsible for them.

A child is the most cherished possession possibul and our responsibility to give it every chance in life, NOT put it in a disadvantageous/perverse position.

'This thread' has clearly shown a trie picture of some.

In actual fact I reckon the trolls could be having a field day as no decent respectable individual could post in such a way.

Heaven help you.

All kids or just white ones?

by HoratioTarr Mon Oct 10, 2016 3:35 pm

WhoseYourWolfie wrote:
Eilzel wrote:
I'd personally question anyone being a parent if they can't even string together coherent sentences in their native language.

NOT ONLY IS Major/Stormee the #1 "keyboard warrior" on this forum, he is also one of the leading trolls and spammers on here (and no real surprise that most of them have links through those couple of other infamous sites..).

WITH BOTH Major and Tommy, I often have to seriously wonder whether either of those nongs really have any children in real life..

AFTER ALL, can anyone actually believe that any decent and self-respecting woman would ever get involved with either of those weasels ?

LET ALONE consider breeding with them..

Now you sound just like the person you say you can't stand.

by Tommy Monk Mon Oct 10, 2016 3:50 pm

The hypocrisy of the left knows no bounds...

by Major Mon Oct 10, 2016 4:56 pm

eddie wrote:
Major wrote:IMHO some on here have sunk lower than a skunkz belly on this topic and have proved beyond any reasonable doubt they are not fit to have babiz of their own or be responsible for them.

A child is the most cherished possession possibul and our responsibility to give it every chance in life, NOT put it in a disadvantageous/perverse position.

'This thread' has clearly shown a trie picture of some.

In actual fact I reckon the trolls could be having a field day as no decent respectable individual could post in such a way.

Heaven help you.

Why don't you shut up you whatless fuckwit?

How nice such antagonising against the rules language coming from a mod.

ya cannot abide the truth, can ya eddie?

"whatless"?????????????????????????????????????????????????

by Major Mon Oct 10, 2016 5:01 pm

HoratioTarr wrote:
Major wrote:IMHO some on here have sunk lower than a skunkz belly on this topic and have proved beyond any reasonable doubt they are not fit to have babiz of their own or be responsible for them.

A child is the most cherished possession possibul and our responsibility to give it every chance in life, NOT put it in a disadvantageous/perverse position.

'This thread' has clearly shown a trie picture of some.

In actual fact I reckon the trolls could be having a field day as no decent respectable individual could post in such a way.

Heaven help you.

All kids or just white ones?

YES.

by Guest Mon Oct 10, 2016 5:05 pm

Major wrote:
eddie wrote:

Why don't you shut up you whatless fuckwit?

How nice such antagonising against the rules language coming from a mod.

ya cannot abide the truth, can ya eddie?

"whatless"?????????????????????????????????????????????????

She probably meant 'witless'. It would, after all, be very appropriate.

by Victorismyhero Mon Oct 10, 2016 5:22 pm

well I'll ask major directly, since his "club" seems to have chickened out YET AGAIN

what the fuck has it got to do with you

be it a kid dressing in a fairy costume or some one who is gay??

you do realise YOU are the ones that are "sick in the head" dont you...

YOUR opinion is
a dying minority
out of place in todays world
the CAUSE of the bullying you refer to...see if idiots like you minded their own business and stopped passing round these negative views.....the bullies would have nothing to feed on

you know what that makes you dont you......

useless rubbish that should be culled at the first opportunity........

by Major Mon Oct 10, 2016 5:59 pm

Lord Foul wrote:well I'll ask major directly, since his "club" seems to have chickened out YET AGAIN

what the fuck has it got to do with you

be it a kid dressing in a fairy costume or some one who is gay??

you do realise YOU are the ones that are "sick in the head" dont you...

YOUR opinion is
a dying minority
out of place in todays world
the CAUSE of the bullying you refer to...see if idiots like you minded their own business and stopped passing round these negative views.....the bullies would have nothing to feed on

you know what that makes you dont you......

useless rubbish that should be culled at the first opportunity........

THIS TOO SERIOUS TO IGNORE.

We now have Lord Foul a forum moderator inciting death, murder upon forum members.

This is mega serious, Ben, can we have your comments on this illegal, criminal against the rules comment from Lord Foul.

Thank you.

by eddie Mon Oct 10, 2016 6:03 pm

sassy wrote:
Major wrote:
eddie wrote:

Why don't you shut up you whatless fuckwit?

How nice such antagonising against the rules language coming from a mod.

ya cannot abide the truth, can ya eddie?

"whatless"?????????????????????????????????????????????????

She probably meant 'witless'. It would, after all, be very appropriate.

No. I meant whatless. It's a Jamaican saying and it fits him like a skin.

by Major Mon Oct 10, 2016 6:09 pm

I only speak, scribe our queens English as you know only too well, eddie afro

by eddie Mon Oct 10, 2016 6:11 pm

There are so many things wrong with that sentence.

by 'Wolfie Mon Oct 10, 2016 6:14 pm

Major wrote:
Lord Foul wrote:well I'll ask major directly, since his "club" seems to have chickened out YET AGAIN

what the fuck has it got to do with you

be it a kid dressing in a fairy costume or some one who is gay??

you do realise YOU are the ones that are "sick in the head" dont you...

YOUR opinion is
a dying minority
out of place in todays world
the CAUSE of the bullying you refer to...see if idiots like you minded their own business and stopped passing round these negative views.....the bullies would have nothing to feed on

you know what that makes you dont you......

useless rubbish that should be culled at the first opportunity........

THIS TOO SERIOUS TO IGNORE.

We now have Lord Foul a forum moderator inciting death, murder upon forum members.

This is mega serious, Ben, can we have your comments on this illegal, criminal against the rules comment from Lord Foul.

Thank you.

Intresting that you haven't complained in the past, when your little mate Tommy has wished death on various left wingers on here, Major...

Obviously it only upsets you when such feelings are expressed about you...

You hypocritical little turd.

by Major Mon Oct 10, 2016 6:21 pm

WhoseYourWolfie wrote:
Major wrote:

THIS TOO SERIOUS TO IGNORE.

We now have Lord Foul a forum moderator inciting death, murder upon forum members.

This is mega serious, Ben, can we have your comments on this illegal, criminal against the rules comment from Lord Foul.

Thank you.

Intresting that you haven't complained in the past, when your little mate Tommy has wished death on various left wingers on here, Major...

Obviously it only upsets you when such feelings are expressed about you...

You hypocritical little turd.

Tommy rox and tells the truth, maybe you should do such, Wolfie.

You do seem to use the word TURD quite a lot, will you explain your interest in it, are you trying to quietly 'come out', tell us something?????

by Tommy Monk Mon Oct 10, 2016 6:41 pm

Lord Foul wrote:well I'll ask major directly, since his "club" seems to have chickened out YET AGAIN

what the fuck has it got to do with you

be it a kid dressing in a fairy costume or some one who is gay??

you do realise YOU are the ones that are "sick in the head" dont you...

YOUR opinion is
a dying minority
out of place in todays world
the CAUSE of the bullying you refer to...see if idiots like you minded their own business and stopped passing round these negative views.....the bullies would have nothing to feed on

you know what that makes you dont you......

useless rubbish that should be culled at the first opportunity........

Well since the stupid mother splashed it all over the tabloid paper... it is in the public domain... and everyone has a right to have an opinion on it... and everyone has a right to an opinion on the general question of whether boys should be wearing girls fairy dress or not...

And the answer is a resounding NO BOYS SHOULDNT WEAR GIRLS DRESSES!!!

by Victorismyhero Mon Oct 10, 2016 6:48 pm

NO tommy...see if that delivery idiot hadnt felt the need to "not mind his own business" in the first place

there would have been no need or reason for the woman to make any comment on it....
her wisdom of doing so is altogether another matter of course....

but....what business of YOURS is it if some boy wants to wear a girls dress....?? thats the point at issue here...

is isnt.......any of your (or anyone elses) business....and those who wish to make it so especially as a negative thing are the wrong sort of people to be allowed in our society

by Raggamuffin Mon Oct 10, 2016 6:48 pm

veya_victaous wrote:another +1 to les's post

Cowards like Tommy will never understand their Irrational Fear of things that are different Does NOT entitle them cause pain and suffering to another simply for being different.
It also does not only NOT entitle them to teach their irrational fears to younger generations, They SHOULD be sanctioned for it.

Because as the better part of humanity can see it is an irrational fear of a primitive unevolved brain. it is something that soceity needs to actively weed out as it is a critcal weakness of charater that causes social problems. those that have this 'faulty wiring of the brain' are no different that Drug addicts, they are addicted to fear and hate and the endorphins it releases in their brains, and their addiction causes numerous social issues.

Also Any Individual that thinks it is right to Strike first is in the wrong in everyway and should be removed from society as a potential threat as they have said they will strike first. they are terrorist to a segement of society that they irrationally fear.
when you 'Strike First' you are the aggressor and thus the Problem.

You can apply this to individuals of any religion thus all the malcontents can be dealt with equally and you can round up Tommy and Major and the crazy Imams all in one go.

You're the aggressor here, so should you be removed from society? You're also being very intolerant of religious people.

by Raggamuffin Mon Oct 10, 2016 6:52 pm

Lord Foul wrote:NO tommy...see if that delivery idiot hadnt felt the need to "not mind his own business" in the first place

there would have been no need or reason for the woman to make any comment on it....
her wisdom of doing so is altogether another matter of course....

but....what business of YOURS is it if some boy wants to wear a girls dress....?? thats the point at issue here...

is isnt.......any of your (or anyone elses) business....and those who wish to make it so especially as a negative thing are the wrong sort of people to be allowed in our society

She made it everyone's business by going public over a daft comment though. The delivery driver didn't go running to the press - she did.

by Victorismyhero Mon Oct 10, 2016 6:55 pm

since organised (and especially(but not exclusively) abrahamic) religion is predicated on intolerance it can hardly complain when it "gets a bit of its own back". Delivery man tells young boy to stop dressing as a fairy. - Page 7 2190311264

Delivery man tells young boy to stop dressing as a fairy. - Page 7 2190311264

by Raggamuffin Mon Oct 10, 2016 6:55 pm

Two admin/mods in this thread have called for the removal or culling of people from society. Is that a record? Laughing

by eddie Mon Oct 10, 2016 6:56 pm

Who called for people to be culled?

by Raggamuffin Mon Oct 10, 2016 6:56 pm

Lord Foul wrote:since organised (and especially(but not exclusively) abrahamic) religion is predicated on intolerance it can hardly complain when it "gets a bit of its own back".

WTF does this have to do with religion? Fuck all, that's what. What is wrong with you and your little mob that you can't leave religious people alone for five minutes? Then you have the nerve to lecture others about "intolerance".

by Raggamuffin Mon Oct 10, 2016 6:57 pm

eddie wrote:Who called for people to be culled?

Victor did.

by Victorismyhero Mon Oct 10, 2016 6:59 pm

Raggamuffin wrote:
Lord Foul wrote:NO tommy...see if that delivery idiot hadnt felt the need to "not mind his own business" in the first place

there would have been no need or reason for the woman to make any comment on it....
her wisdom of doing so is altogether another matter of course....

but....what business of YOURS is it if some boy wants to wear a girls dress....?? thats the point at issue here...

is isnt.......any of your (or anyone elses) business....and those who wish to make it so especially as a negative thing are the wrong sort of people to be allowed in our society

She made it everyone's business by going public over a daft comment though. The delivery driver didn't go running to the press - she did.

granted.....as said her wisdom of doing so is however another matter.....

BUT, the fault lies entirely with the starter of the chain of events....the delivery driver, who whilst entitled, I suppose, to his primitive and backward views, is NOT entitled to act or impose/attemt to impose those views upon the prents or kid...In other words ...ITS got nowt to do with him and he should know when to STFU.

by Raggamuffin Mon Oct 10, 2016 7:01 pm

Lord Foul wrote:
Raggamuffin wrote:

She made it everyone's business by going public over a daft comment though. The delivery driver didn't go running to the press - she did.

granted.....as said her wisdom of doing so is however another matter.....

BUT, the fault lies entirely with the starter of the chain of events....the delivery driver, who whilst entitled, I suppose, to his primitive and backward views, is NOT entitled to act or impose/attemt to impose those views upon the prents or kid...In other words ...ITS got nowt to do with him and he should know when to STFU.

Meh. People often say things they shouldn't say. If everyone who did so ended up in the Daily Mirror, there would be no other news. This is about an attention-seeking woman who wanted to get her name and photo in the press.

by Victorismyhero Mon Oct 10, 2016 7:04 pm

Raggamuffin wrote:
Lord Foul wrote:since organised (and especially(but not exclusively) abrahamic) religion is predicated on intolerance it can hardly complain when it "gets a bit of its own back".

WTF does this have to do with religion? Fuck all, that's what. What is wrong with you and your little mob that you can't leave religious people alone for five minutes? Then you have the nerve to lecture others about "intolerance".

Everything...

there are two sorts of people who get their tights in a tangle about this sort of thing, both are idiots and both suffer from a sanctimonious misapprehension that they are the arbiters of morality

these two sorts of people are
the hard right who like to strut around bullying people
the religious...who just like to bully people

and the two are often , though not always, synonymous

by Syl Mon Oct 10, 2016 7:05 pm

This thread has disintegrated from a lively one where people were exchanging different views, to a groundhog day one where people were just repeating themselves in a semi civilised fashion to a nasty one where people are wishing death and destruction on others who don't agree with them.

Bloody Pathetic. Rolling Eyes

by Tommy Monk Mon Oct 10, 2016 7:07 pm

It's not primitive or backwards to think that boys should not wear girls fairy dresses...

And it certainly isn't a step more evolved or a forwards thing for boys to wear girls fairy dresses...

It's simply not right... and now the boy knows that dresses are for girls... it appears he doesn't wear it any more...

The van driver has done the boy a favour and done what the parents should have done all along... but failed in their duty to set the boy on the correct path...

by Victorismyhero Mon Oct 10, 2016 7:07 pm

well syl, when the opposing side are the destroyers of civilizations and the anti progress brigade......

by Victorismyhero Mon Oct 10, 2016 7:10 pm

Tommy Monk wrote:It's not primitive or backwards to think that boys should not wear girls fairy dresses...

And it certainly isn't a step more evolved or a forwards thing for boys to wear girls fairy dresses...

It's simply not right... and now the boy knows that dresses are for girls... it appears he doesn't wear it any more...

The van driver has done the boy a favour and done what the parents should have done all along... but failed in their duty to set the boy on the correct path...

Its simply not right ...so says YOU...and yet.....you cannot give even one simple reason

you remind me more and more of the cave man seeing his neighbour with a wheel......"its not right...it'll never catch on" it is an offense to "insert whatever deity you wish"

I suppose you would have burned galileo at the stake Rolling Eyes

by Raggamuffin Mon Oct 10, 2016 7:14 pm

Lord Foul wrote:
Raggamuffin wrote:

WTF does this have to do with religion? Fuck all, that's what. What is wrong with you and your little mob that you can't leave religious people alone for five minutes? Then you have the nerve to lecture others about "intolerance".

Everything...

there are two sorts of people who get their tights in a tangle about this sort of thing, both are idiots and both suffer from a sanctimonious misapprehension that they are the arbiters of morality

these two sorts of people are
the hard right who like to strut around bullying people
the religious...who just like to bully people

and the two are often , though not always, synonymous

It has nothing to do with religion. I don't think the people who have been vocal in this thread have mentioned religion, and there's no indication that their views are anything to do with religion. It's a shame you've jumped on the "let's bash religion for no reason" bandwagon. I thought you were a free thinker, but you're obviously not.

by Raggamuffin Mon Oct 10, 2016 7:17 pm

Most of the admin/mods are all treading the same path on this forum now. They're bigoted against those with religious faith, disruptive, and at least two of them are pretty much wishing death on people. They're becoming virtually indistinguishable from each other.

by Syl Mon Oct 10, 2016 7:19 pm

Lord Foul wrote:well syl, when the opposing side are the destroyers of civilizations and the anti progress brigade......

Absolute rubbish.
I don't agree with the little boy being encouraged (as he obviously was) to wear a dress... if that makes me in your eyes a destroyer of civilisation and against progress I think you seriously need a reality check.
This thread has been split 50/50 I would say in whether we agree or not, maybe a little tolerance of each others views and the reasons for them wouldn't go amiss.

by Ben Reilly Mon Oct 10, 2016 7:20 pm

Raggamuffin wrote:Most of the admin/mods are all treading the same path on this forum now. They're bigoted against those with religious faith, disruptive, and at least two of them are pretty much wishing death on people. They're becoming virtually indistinguishable from each other.

Aw ... we like you too, Rags I love you

by Tommy Monk Mon Oct 10, 2016 7:20 pm

Lord Foul wrote:
Tommy Monk wrote:It's not primitive or backwards to think that boys should not wear girls fairy dresses...

And it certainly isn't a step more evolved or a forwards thing for boys to wear girls fairy dresses...

It's simply not right... and now the boy knows that dresses are for girls... it appears he doesn't wear it any more...

The van driver has done the boy a favour and done what the parents should have done all along... but failed in their duty to set the boy on the correct path...

Its simply not right ...so says YOU...and yet.....you cannot give even one simple reason

you remind me more and more of the cave man seeing his neighbour with a wheel......"its not right...it'll never catch on" it is an offense to "insert whatever deity you wish"

I suppose you would have burned galileo at the stake

Don't be a twat... I've given plenty of reasons... even another poster has already backed it up that I've given reasons... Syl i think, or if not it was HT...

What good is it for this boy to be led to believe that wearing girls fairy dresses is ok/good...?

Or since you liken it to the invention of the wheel or galileo... what revolutionary scientific breakthrough is to be gained by this boy being led to believe that wearing girls fairy dresses is good...?

There is nothing good about it... only leading to further confusion for the lad further down the line...

by Syl Mon Oct 10, 2016 7:25 pm

Tommy Monk wrote:
Lord Foul wrote:

Its simply not right ...so says YOU...and yet.....you cannot give even one simple reason

you remind me more and more of the cave man seeing his neighbour with a wheel......"its not right...it'll never catch on" it is an offense to "insert whatever deity you wish"

I suppose you would have burned galileo at the stake

Don't be a twat... I've given plenty of reasons... even another poster has already backed it up that I've given reasons... Syl i think, or if not it was HT...

What good is it for this boy to be led to believe that wearing girls fairy dresses is ok/good...?

Or since you liken it to the invention of the wheel or galileo... what revolutionary scientific breakthrough is to be gained by this boy being led to believe that wearing girls fairy dresses is good...?

There is nothing good about it... only leading to further confusion for the lad further down the line...

It was me Tommy.
Reasons have been given but because they don't suit you are asked to provide more.
This thread has gone round in circles and it's now giving some an opportunity to just be bloody nasty.

And I don't see why religion has been brought into it either....it has nothing whatsoever to do with religion.

by Tommy Monk Mon Oct 10, 2016 7:29 pm

Syl wrote:
Tommy Monk wrote:

Don't be a twat... I've given plenty of reasons... even another poster has already backed it up that I've given reasons... Syl i think, or if not it was HT...

What good is it for this boy to be led to believe that wearing girls fairy dresses is ok/good...?

Or since you liken it to the invention of the wheel or galileo... what revolutionary scientific breakthrough is to be gained by this boy being led to believe that wearing girls fairy dresses is good...?

There is nothing good about it... only leading to further confusion for the lad further down the line...

It was me Tommy.
Reasons have been given but because they don't suit you are asked to provide more.
This thread has gone round in circles and it's now giving some an opportunity to just be bloody nasty.

And I don't see why religion has been brought into it either....it has nothing whatsoever to do with religion.

Thanks again Syl...!

Laughing

I could post up the reasons against but some will just pretend they haven't seen them again...

by Victorismyhero Mon Oct 10, 2016 7:29 pm

Syl wrote:
Lord Foul wrote:well syl, when the opposing side are the destroyers of civilizations and the anti progress brigade......

Absolute rubbish.
I don't agree with the little boy being encouraged (as he obviously was) to wear a dress... if that makes me in your eyes a destroyer of civilisation and against progress I think you seriously need a reality check.
This thread has been split 50/50 I would say in whether we agree or not, maybe a little tolerance of each others views and the reasons for them wouldn't go amiss.

why should I "tolerate" what is nothing more than sanctimonious intolerance?

by Victorismyhero Mon Oct 10, 2016 7:30 pm

After all ...the ONLY excuse YOU can find is that he may be bullied for it....that is NOT the fault of either him or his parents, but of those who seek to impose their narrow minded views on others.....

by Sponsored content