Delivery man tells young boy to stop dressing as a fairy.

by Syl Wed Oct 05, 2016 7:09 pm

First topic message reminder :

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/mum-furious-after-son-wearing-8975210?ICID=FB_mirror_main

"Wendy, who also has a two-year-old daughter, Felicity, said she couldn't believe her ears.
She said: "If he had said it's unusual to be a fairy, we wouldn't have have thought too much of it but saying someone should take Isaac to one side implies he was doing something wrong.
"I feel disappointed that there are still people in this world that ask questions like that and and think it is their right to tell other people what they can and cannot wear.
"My son has been more reluctant to wear his fairy dress since, he has only worn it once or twice whereas he used to wear it all the time."

Obviously the delivery driver should have minded his own business, but should a 4 year old boy be encouraged to dress up as a fairy?

by Syl Thu Oct 06, 2016 7:42 pm

eddie wrote:No because you've just confused him. His next question will be "Why are some clothes unisex?"

And you don't really know the answer if you're honest. Who does?

What you're really saying is:
"I don't want you to wear that dress because boys aren't supposed to wear dresses (don't know why that is, we've just been told that once - my mum told me) and if you do wear it then you might get called a name (that won't be your fault but you will have to be the one to make the sacrifice even though you've done nothing wrong) and life is just easier if we wear what we are supposed to and mummy won't worry and you won't have to deal with bullies until they may find something else to bully you about if you're unlucky"

And Syl I don't get it. It's like bowing down to what other's think and at the same time planting the seed that they must "always fit in".

They have enough time at senior school having to wear uniforms and at work all their adult life - why not let them just be children?

Have to go Eddie, I will answer later. x

by Raggamuffin Thu Oct 06, 2016 7:57 pm

sassy wrote:The delivery driver should have been given a good slap. My kids had a big dressing up box when they were little, they all used to wear anything in it, and my two girls used to dress their brother up as anything, which he took in good part. He was daft enough to join the cubs at one time and in their Christmas play, because he had gold colour hair, they dressed him up as Goldilocks. He's 6.5" with a family and played rugby etc. I can't believe that in this day and age people still think that what children wear when they are young will effect their sexuality. Sexuality is in your genetic make up - wearing a skirt won't make a jot of difference.

You shouldn't advocate assaulting a delivery driver just because you don't agree with him.

by eddie Thu Oct 06, 2016 8:01 pm

Raggamuffin wrote:
sassy wrote:The delivery driver should have been given a good slap. My kids had a big dressing up box when they were little, they all used to wear anything in it, and my two girls used to dress their brother up as anything, which he took in good part. He was daft enough to join the cubs at one time and in their Christmas play, because he had gold colour hair, they dressed him up as Goldilocks. He's 6.5" with a family and played rugby etc. I can't believe that in this day and age people still think that what children wear when they are young will effect their sexuality. Sexuality is in your genetic make up - wearing a skirt won't make a jot of difference.

You shouldn't advocate assaulting a delivery driver just because you don't agree with him.

And delivery drivers shouldn't verbally assault children and their mothers simply because a male child is wearing a dress.
I'd have slapped him too.

by Raggamuffin Thu Oct 06, 2016 8:05 pm

eddie wrote:
Raggamuffin wrote:

You shouldn't advocate assaulting a delivery driver just because you don't agree with him.

And delivery drivers shouldn't verbally assault children and their mothers simply because a male child is wearing a dress.
I'd have slapped him too.

Then you would have been guilty of assault - not a good example to set really.

by Ben Reilly Thu Oct 06, 2016 8:31 pm

Chances are he won't want to dress as a female character within a few months or years anyway -- kids are constantly changing!

If he grows up and decides he wants to wear dresses exclusively -- it's his life!

by eddie Thu Oct 06, 2016 9:27 pm

Raggamuffin wrote:
eddie wrote:
Raggamuffin wrote:

You shouldn't advocate assaulting a delivery driver just because you don't agree with him.

And delivery drivers shouldn't verbally assault children and their mothers simply because a male child is wearing a dress.
I'd have slapped him too.

Then you would have been guilty of assault - not a good example to set really.

Probably not rags. Some of us are just passionate and often react out of emotion.

by Raggamuffin Thu Oct 06, 2016 9:30 pm

eddie wrote:
Raggamuffin wrote:

Then you would have been guilty of assault - not a good example to set really.

Probably not rags. Some of us are just passionate and often react out of emotion.

Hmmm, I think that's why assault is against the law - too many people act out of "emotion" without thinking of the consequences.

by eddie Thu Oct 06, 2016 9:32 pm

Yes rags and too many people like to stick their noses in to people's lives instead of delivering a box and asking for a signature. That was the guy's job.

by HoratioTarr Thu Oct 06, 2016 9:35 pm

Tommy Monk wrote:We are the adults and need to be guiding the kids to be doing what is right...

Not just letting them do what ever they feel like at any and every point they want... it's called responsible parenting and leadership...

Boys don't wear fairy dresses...!

And if you think they should... then there is something wrong with you!!!

You sound a bit like a the radical Muslims you criticise here. You need, you should, you must....

From my own experiences with my brother, I'm older than him by 14 years, he was given free rein to dress up as he pleased at home during playtime, which is what this thread is about. It's what he gravitated towards...in his case because he's gay. I don't think anyone is suggesting thisboy be allowed to dress up as a fairy to school.

Making a big deal of these issues is worse than the fairy costume. Like making kids feel guilty about masturbating.

by Raggamuffin Thu Oct 06, 2016 9:36 pm

eddie wrote:Yes rags and too many people like to stick their noses in to people's lives instead of delivering a box and asking for a signature. That was the guy's job.

So don't let the kid answer the door then. It's not as if the kid could sign for it. You can't go around slapping people just for a throwaway remark like that - it's uncivilised and stupid.

by eddie Thu Oct 06, 2016 9:39 pm

Raggamuffin wrote:
eddie wrote:Yes rags and too many people like to stick their noses in to people's lives instead of delivering a box and asking for a signature. That was the guy's job.

So don't let the kid answer the door then. It's not as if the kid could sign for it. You can't go around slapping people just for a throwaway remark like that - it's uncivilised and stupid.

He was uncivilised and stupid.

I daresay the mother was opening rhe door with the child....a child will run to the door when the doorbell goes and mum is right behind. Not quite sure why you keep mentioning the door opener.

by Raggamuffin Thu Oct 06, 2016 9:42 pm

eddie wrote:
Raggamuffin wrote:

So don't let the kid answer the door then. It's not as if the kid could sign for it. You can't go around slapping people just for a throwaway remark like that - it's uncivilised and stupid.

He was uncivilised and stupid.

I daresay the mother was opening rhe door with the child....a child will run to the door when the doorbell goes and mum is right behind. Not quite sure why you keep mentioning the door opener.

It says she "overheard", so she clearly wasn't actually at the door at the time. She should pull herself together - it's not exactly headline news is it? Fancy allowing the press to print a pic of her boy in a dress all over the country.

by Raggamuffin Thu Oct 06, 2016 9:43 pm

Oh, it also says she was upstairs in bed at the time.

by HoratioTarr Thu Oct 06, 2016 9:47 pm

I've mentioned this fact on the other thread but I'll say it here again.

Up until the early 20th century, little boys and girls all wore dresses. A boy wore a dress until the age of 'breeching' and that could be up to age 8.

What is deemed 'acceptable' changes like fashion. No doubt in 100 years' time it'll change again. There is actually no 'right' or 'wrong' with something so trivial as what you wear.

by eddie Thu Oct 06, 2016 9:52 pm

HoratioTarr wrote:I've mentioned this fact on the other thread but I'll say it here again.

Up until the early 20th century, little boys and girls all wore dresses. A boy wore a dress until the age of 'breeching' and that could be up to age 8.

What is deemed 'acceptable' changes like fashion. No doubt in 100 years' time it'll change again. There is actually no 'right' or 'wrong' with something so trivial as what you wear.

And in a nutshell that's it. People conform without realising it.

by Raggamuffin Thu Oct 06, 2016 9:53 pm

It's all such a fuss. I mean - two people on here have actually said they would have slapped the man - all over nothing.

by Victorismyhero Thu Oct 06, 2016 9:56 pm

two of the greatest gifts you can give your child....

the ability to say "fuck you your opinion is worthless" and hence not give a toss about what others think
AND
teach him/her to fight...hard and nasty...teach him/her to turn anger outward into naked and effective agression in defence of self......

by Victorismyhero Thu Oct 06, 2016 9:58 pm

ragga...I would have lodged a formal complaint to his employers, and told them he is NOT to be sent to my house again. he had NO right to make comment...at all...

I dont know how you can defend such a busy body......then again.........

His JOB ...is to deliver packages...nothing more nothing less, and does NOT include passing comment upon what other people do OR how other people live their lives

by Raggamuffin Thu Oct 06, 2016 10:01 pm

Lord Foul wrote:ragga...I would have lodged a formal complaint to his employers, and told them he is NOT to be sent to my house again. he had NO right to make comment...at all...

I dont know how you can defend such a busy body......then again.........

His JOB ...is to deliver packages...nothing more nothing less, and does NOT include passing comment upon what other people do OR how other people live their lives

I'm certainly not going to side with a woman who is clearly attention seeking and thrusting her kid into the press for no good reason. It's ridiculous.

by Tommy Monk Thu Oct 06, 2016 10:05 pm

I wonder how much money she got for this story...?

by HoratioTarr Thu Oct 06, 2016 10:09 pm

Lord Foul wrote:two of the greatest gifts you can give your child....

the ability to say "fuck you your opinion is worthless" and hence not give a toss about what others think
AND
teach him/her to fight...hard and nasty...teach him/her to turn anger outward into naked and effective agression in defence of self......

See, I disagree. Eddie says she'd have smacked him one, which I don't think for one moment she actually would have, and it's a just a figure of speech. And here you are, advocating more violence. The problem in the world these days is that kids do say 'Fuck you and your worthless opinion' and more and more we see wild, feckless youngsters beating each other up for shits and giggles.

Better to teach your kids to respect their elders, not take bad words or actions to heart, and defend themselves only when necessary...which is what martial arts teaches.

by eddie Thu Oct 06, 2016 10:18 pm

You're right Horatio, I wouldn't have slapped him possibly but I'd have verbally assaulted him.

by Victorismyhero Thu Oct 06, 2016 10:20 pm

WHY should they have a blanket respect for their elders....uh no respect is earned even by adults from kids...

and I'm surprised at you HT...you didnt ever strike me as a lefty, and yet here yo8u are falling into this lefty trap of "respect everyone"

buulshite........

you dont (of necessity ) have to respect that policeman (after all you may well know he beats his missus every night)
but you SHOULD respect "the police"

you may well not respect that judge (after all hes a racist git that lets everyone but white englishmen off with trivial sentences)

but you SHOULD respect the institution of the court

you may well not respect the crop of MPS that exist in westminster

but you SHOULD Respect PARLIAMENT

and so on

the left emphasis on the individual, at the expense of the institutions that run the job has a lot to answer for

by Ben Reilly Thu Oct 06, 2016 10:48 pm

Tommy Monk wrote:

I wonder how much money she got for this story...?

We don't pay people for their stories, Tommy. Okay, sometimes we do, but it's against journalistic ethics and journos caught doing it are disgraced.

by Victorismyhero Thu Oct 06, 2016 11:00 pm

journalistic ethics???

wtf

since when do we deal in such depraved oxymorons here

by JulesV Thu Oct 06, 2016 11:04 pm

Syl wrote:http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/mum-furious-after-son-wearing-8975210?ICID=FB_mirror_main

"Wendy, who also has a two-year-old daughter, Felicity, said she couldn't believe her ears.
She said: "If he had said it's unusual to be a fairy, we wouldn't have have thought too much of it but saying someone should take Isaac to one side implies he was doing something wrong.
"I feel disappointed that there are still people in this world that ask questions like that and and think it is their right to tell other people what they can and cannot wear.
"My son has been more reluctant to wear his fairy dress since, he has only worn it once or twice whereas he used to wear it all the time."

Obviously the delivery driver should have minded his own business, but should a 4 year old boy be encouraged to dress up as a fairy?

The word fairy is itself perjorative, aside from other considerations. That complicates matters further.

by The Devil, You Know Thu Oct 06, 2016 11:29 pm

Syl wrote:http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/mum-furious-after-son-wearing-8975210?ICID=FB_mirror_main

"Wendy, who also has a two-year-old daughter, Felicity, said she couldn't believe her ears.
She said: "If he had said it's unusual to be a fairy, we wouldn't have have thought too much of it but saying someone should take Isaac to one side implies he was doing something wrong.
"I feel disappointed that there are still people in this world that ask questions like that and and think it is their right to tell other people what they can and cannot wear.
"My son has been more reluctant to wear his fairy dress since, he has only worn it once or twice whereas he used to wear it all the time."

Obviously the delivery driver should have minded his own business, but should a 4 year old boy be encouraged to dress up as a fairy?

no or he may end up like this dogs dinner
Delivery man tells young boy to stop dressing as a fairy. - Page 3 Izzard10

by The Devil, You Know Thu Oct 06, 2016 11:29 pm

Raggamuffin wrote:
sassy wrote:The delivery driver should have been given a good slap. My kids had a big dressing up box when they were little, they all used to wear anything in it, and my two girls used to dress their brother up as anything, which he took in good part. He was daft enough to join the cubs at one time and in their Christmas play, because he had gold colour hair, they dressed him up as Goldilocks. He's 6.5" with a family and played rugby etc. I can't believe that in this day and age people still think that what children wear when they are young will effect their sexuality. Sexuality is in your genetic make up - wearing a skirt won't make a jot of difference.

You shouldn't advocate assaulting a delivery driver just because you don't agree with him.

violence is the first resort of that socialist type

by The Devil, You Know Thu Oct 06, 2016 11:30 pm

eddie wrote:
Raggamuffin wrote:

You shouldn't advocate assaulting a delivery driver just because you don't agree with him.

And delivery drivers shouldn't verbally assault children and their mothers simply because a male child is wearing a dress.
I'd have slapped him too.

did the delivery driver assault the child. Stop being a drama queen

by eddie Thu Oct 06, 2016 11:30 pm

Eddie Izzard is not a dog's dinner, he's actually pretty sexy.

by The Devil, You Know Thu Oct 06, 2016 11:32 pm

HoratioTarr wrote:I've mentioned this fact on the other thread but I'll say it here again.

Up until the early 20th century, little boys and girls all wore dresses. A boy wore a dress until the age of 'breeching' and that could be up to age 8.

What is deemed 'acceptable' changes like fashion. No doubt in 100 years' time it'll change again. There is actually no 'right' or 'wrong' with something so trivial as what you wear.

100 years ago they shoved kids up chimneys as well. It would save a few bob on getting them cleaned I suppose

by The Devil, You Know Thu Oct 06, 2016 11:33 pm

Lord Foul wrote:ragga...I would have lodged a formal complaint to his employers, and told them he is NOT to be sent to my house again. he had NO right to make comment...at all...

I dont know how you can defend such a busy body......then again.........

His JOB ...is to deliver packages...nothing more nothing less, and does NOT include passing comment upon what other people do OR how other people live their lives

of course we only have this offendatrons word that he said anything of the sort

by The Devil, You Know Thu Oct 06, 2016 11:35 pm

eddie wrote:You're right Horatio, I wouldn't have slapped him possibly but I'd have verbally assaulted him.

which he could have considered assault in these litigious days and you would never get another parcel delivered

by The Devil, You Know Thu Oct 06, 2016 11:37 pm

eddie wrote:Eddie Izzard is not a dog's dinner, he's actually pretty sexy.

no he's a sad desperate man who has seen his best years behind him who is becoming a parody of himself.

but long may he keep helping labour to victory after victory.

I understand him and bob geldorf will be running the labour campaign for 2020

by Tommy Monk Fri Oct 07, 2016 12:12 am

Ben Reilly wrote:
Tommy Monk wrote:

I wonder how much money she got for this story...?

We don't pay people for their stories, Tommy. Okay, sometimes we do, but it's against journalistic ethics and journos caught doing it are disgraced.

'We'...?

I thought you said you worked for a local high school footbal/sports magazine...!?

But you just said 'we dont'... then immediately said 'sometimes we do'...!

Leftie quantum thinking again I see...!!!

And the other main problem I have with what you just claimed... how the fuk do you know what the uk daily mirror does or doesn't do...?

How do you know they haven't paid for, or even completely created this non story...!?

by Eilzel Fri Oct 07, 2016 2:01 am

Tommy Monk wrote:We are the adults and need to be guiding the kids to be doing what is right...

Not just letting them do what ever they feel like at any and every point they want... it's called responsible parenting and leadership...

Boys don't wear fairy dresses...!

And if you think they should... then there is something wrong with you!!!

Why can't a boy wear a dress if he wants to?

What exactly makes it 'wrong'?

Are you a dictator?

by veya_victaous Fri Oct 07, 2016 3:23 am

Eilzel wrote:
Tommy Monk wrote:We are the adults and need to be guiding the kids to be doing what is right...

Not just letting them do what ever they feel like at any and every point they want... it's called responsible parenting and leadership...

Boys don't wear fairy dresses...!

And if you think they should... then there is something wrong with you!!!

Why can't a boy wear a dress if he wants to?

What exactly makes it 'wrong'?

Are you a dictator?

well as there is something wrong with tommy on many levels his point is Moot.

he is exactly what we are trying to remove from society,
because he is wrong and bad person.
And Any fucker want to stick up for him i will say you are a bad person too
Pieces of Shit like tommy are literally why kids commit suicide
He is scum and society is clearly much better off without people like him or this delivery driver,
they are People that think because they have deep seated unresolved sexual issues the rest of society should too.

by Tommy Monk Fri Oct 07, 2016 3:51 am

Eilzel wrote:
Tommy Monk wrote:We are the adults and need to be guiding the kids to be doing what is right...

Not just letting them do what ever they feel like at any and every point they want... it's called responsible parenting and leadership...

Boys don't wear fairy dresses...!

And if you think they should... then there is something wrong with you!!!

Why can't a boy wear a dress if he wants to?

What exactly makes it 'wrong'?

Are you a dictator?

Why can't a white boy dress up as a black boy with face paint if he wants to...?

What if all his peers were black and he just wanted to fit in...?

What's so wrong about that?

Are you a dictator?

What's wrong with a boy wearing a burka if he wants to?

Or how about just wearing the bag type top bit over his head and running around with a broomstick up his arse shouting 'expeliamas'...?

Why not... if that's what he wanted to do...?

What if all his peers were head bag wearing Muslim girls who liked Harry Potter films...?

What is so wrong with that...?

If that is what he wanted to do... why not...?

Are you a dictator...?

by Tommy Monk Fri Oct 07, 2016 3:59 am

veya_victaous wrote:
Eilzel wrote:

Why can't a boy wear a dress if he wants to?

What exactly makes it 'wrong'?

Are you a dictator?

well as there is something wrong with tommy on many levels his point is Moot.

he is exactly what we are trying to remove from society,
because he is wrong and bad person.
And Any fucker want to stick up for him i will say you are a bad person too
Pieces of Shit like tommy are literally why kids commit suicide
He is scum and society is clearly much better off without people like him or this delivery driver,
they are People that think because they have deep seated unresolved sexual issues the rest of society should too.

It's idiots like you who have the deep seeded unresolved sexual issues... and who are obviously confused over what's right and wrong... who are trying to inflict this confusion onto the future generation to try to validate your own weirdness as being more normal...

by Eilzel Fri Oct 07, 2016 4:10 am

Tommy Monk wrote:
Eilzel wrote:

Why can't a boy wear a dress if he wants to?

What exactly makes it 'wrong'?

Are you a dictator?

Why can't a white boy dress up as a black boy with face paint if he wants to...?

What if all his peers were black and he just wanted to fit in...?

What's so wrong about that?

Are you a dictator?

What's wrong with a boy wearing a burka if he wants to?

Or how about just wearing the bag type top bit over his head and running around with a broomstick up his arse shouting 'expeliamas'...?

Why not... if that's what he wanted to do...?

What if all his peers were head bag wearing Muslim girls who liked Harry Potter films...?

What is so wrong with that...?

If that is what he wanted to do... why not...?

Are you a dictator...?

The difference between you and me, tommy, is I can, and am about to, give ACTUAL reasons for or against those things you mention.

1) White people wearing black face paint is offensive due to its role in the past as promoting racial stereotypes- that's why.

2) I'm against the burkha (as in full body covering where only the eyes are seen) in general for security reasons. For kids or adults.

3) I have no problem at all with boys dressing up as witches. Again it's just for fun so whatever.

Now YOUR turn- WHY should a boy not be allowed to dress as a fairy or in a dress IF he wants to?

by Eilzel Fri Oct 07, 2016 4:11 am

Tommy Monk wrote:
veya_victaous wrote:

well as there is something wrong with tommy on many levels his point is Moot.

he is exactly what we are trying to remove from society,
because he is wrong and bad person.
And Any fucker want to stick up for him i will say you are a bad person too
Pieces of Shit like tommy are literally why kids commit suicide
He is scum and society is clearly much better off without people like him or this delivery driver,
they are People that think because they have deep seated unresolved sexual issues the rest of society should too.

It's idiots like you who have the deep seeded unresolved sexual issues... and who are obviously confused over what's right and wrong... who are trying to inflict this confusion onto the future generation to try to validate your own weirdness as being more normal...

Again you can't just SAY something is wrong and have that be it. You have to justify WHY it is wrong or you are just being arrogant.

Did you know original pink was for boys and blue for girls? (Not long ago in relative terms). But now YOU would say pink on boys is WRONG. For no reason other than deeply entrenched social brainwashing.

by veya_victaous Fri Oct 07, 2016 4:43 am

Tommy Monk wrote:
veya_victaous wrote:
Eilzel wrote:

Why can't a boy wear a dress if he wants to?

What exactly makes it 'wrong'?

Are you a dictator?

well as there is something wrong with tommy on many levels his point is Moot.

he is exactly what we are trying to remove from society,
because he is wrong and bad person.
And Any fucker want to stick up for him i will say you are a bad person too
Pieces of Shit like tommy are literally why kids commit suicide
He is scum and society is clearly much better off without people like him or this delivery driver,
they are People that think because they have deep seated unresolved sexual issues the rest of society should too.

It's idiots like you who have the deep seeded unresolved sexual issues... and who are obviously confused over what's right and wrong... who are trying to inflict this confusion onto the future generation to try to validate your own weirdness as being more normal...

NO CONFUSION What SO EVER
What Is Wrong is Obvious
YOU ARE WRONG

that is what is wrong YOU!!!
get it through your head YOU ARE DISGUSTING
YOU ARE A PIECE OF SHIT
YOU REPRESENT THE BAD OLD DAYS
When the Shit like you say was accepted

The kid is NOT WRONG
YOU ARE!!!!
The Sooner we get rid of the Scum bags like you the better
Thank fully that is what time is doing anyway.

by Raggamuffin Fri Oct 07, 2016 7:05 am

eddie wrote:You're right Horatio, I wouldn't have slapped him possibly but I'd have verbally assaulted him.

Abusing a delivery man in front of a young child is not setting a good example, and it would just make you look common.

by Raggamuffin Fri Oct 07, 2016 7:09 am

veya_victaous wrote:
Eilzel wrote:

Why can't a boy wear a dress if he wants to?

What exactly makes it 'wrong'?

Are you a dictator?

well as there is something wrong with tommy on many levels his point is Moot.

he is exactly what we are trying to remove from society,
because he is wrong and bad person.
And Any fucker want to stick up for him i will say you are a bad person too
Pieces of Shit like tommy are literally why kids commit suicide
He is scum and society is clearly much better off without people like him or this delivery driver,
they are People that think because they have deep seated unresolved sexual issues the rest of society should too.

I'll stick up for him. I'm sure I won't lose any sleep if someone like you calls me a "bad person". After all, you're a racist, abusive moron who advocates social and ethnic cleansing. Smile

by Raggamuffin Fri Oct 07, 2016 7:12 am

veya_victaous wrote:
Tommy Monk wrote:

It's idiots like you who have the deep seeded unresolved sexual issues... and who are obviously confused over what's right and wrong... who are trying to inflict this confusion onto the future generation to try to validate your own weirdness as being more normal...

NO CONFUSION What SO EVER
What Is Wrong is Obvious
YOU ARE WRONG

that is what is wrong YOU!!!
get it through your head YOU ARE DISGUSTING
YOU ARE A PIECE OF SHIT
YOU REPRESENT THE BAD OLD DAYS
When the Shit like you say was accepted

The kid is NOT WRONG
YOU ARE!!!!
The Sooner we get rid of the Scum bags like you the better
Thank fully that is what time is doing anyway.

You have to say why you think he's wrong - Les says so. Razz

You should really stop inciting people to hate others.

by Eilzel Fri Oct 07, 2016 7:18 am

Tommy is wrong until he gives a good explanation as to why he is right.

A boy can't wear a fairy costume because he can't, doesn't cut it.

by eddie Fri Oct 07, 2016 7:18 am

Eilzel wrote:
Tommy Monk wrote:
veya_victaous wrote:

well as there is something wrong with tommy on many levels his point is Moot.

he is exactly what we are trying to remove from society,
because he is wrong and bad person.
And Any fucker want to stick up for him i will say you are a bad person too
Pieces of Shit like tommy are literally why kids commit suicide
He is scum and society is clearly much better off without people like him or this delivery driver,
they are People that think because they have deep seated unresolved sexual issues the rest of society should too.

It's idiots like you who have the deep seeded unresolved sexual issues... and who are obviously confused over what's right and wrong... who are trying to inflict this confusion onto the future generation to try to validate your own weirdness as being more normal...

Again you can't just SAY something is wrong and have that be it. You have to justify WHY it is wrong or you are just being arrogant.

Did you know original pink was for boys and blue for girls? (Not long ago in relative terms). But now YOU would say pink on boys is WRONG. For no reason other than deeply entrenched social brainwashing.

It doesn't matter how many ways you find of explaining that a square has four equal sides, Tommy will still squash it and call it a rectangle.

by Raggamuffin Fri Oct 07, 2016 7:25 am

The Devil, You Know wrote:
Lord Foul wrote:ragga...I would have lodged a formal complaint to his employers, and told them he is NOT to be sent to my house again. he had NO right to make comment...at all...

I dont know how you can defend such a busy body......then again.........

His JOB ...is to deliver packages...nothing more nothing less, and does NOT include passing comment upon what other people do OR how other people live their lives

of course we only have this offendatrons word that he said anything of the sort

Yes. She wasn't even downstairs at the time. Did she write down what he said? Did she actually go to the press with this "story"?

Her husband was downstairs unpacking the shopping, which is weird as, according to this woman, the delivery driver said it when the kid answered the door.

I hope Sainsbury's actually asked the delivery man what he actually said instead of just assuming that the woman was right. They shouldn't talk about their drivers in public anyway.

by Raggamuffin Fri Oct 07, 2016 7:27 am

Eilzel wrote:Tommy is wrong until he gives a good explanation as to why he is right.

A boy can't wear a fairy costume because he can't, doesn't cut it.

Did he actually say that? Saying he can wear one isn't a good explanation either. It's just a difference in opinion.

by Raggamuffin Fri Oct 07, 2016 7:28 am

eddie wrote:
Eilzel wrote:

Again you can't just SAY something is wrong and have that be it. You have to justify WHY it is wrong or you are just being arrogant.

Did you know original pink was for boys and blue for girls? (Not long ago in relative terms). But now YOU would say pink on boys is WRONG. For no reason other than deeply entrenched social brainwashing.

It doesn't matter how many ways you find of explaining that a square has four equal sides, Tommy will still squash it and call it a rectangle.

Says the person who makes up conspiracy theories ...

by Sponsored content