non halal and syrian refugees

by Guest Sat Sep 12, 2015 4:54 pm

First topic message reminder :

Just found this bit of information as i think the Syrian refugees refusing food parcels from red cross charities is ungrateful .

"Allah tells us in the Qur'an that we may eat of the good food of Christians and Jews. Therefore, unless there is a specific reason for the prohibition of a particular type of food prepared by such people, it is permissible to eat it.

So what's their problem ?

by Tommy Monk Thu Sep 17, 2015 11:24 pm

I understand my language perfectly... what I am struggling with is your use of It And what you are actually trying to say!

Something can only be said to have 'evolved' if there has been a significant change between the latter and the former...

So basically, you are saying that you want to see change in the proscribed punishments that are given in your guide book...

But trying to call this 'being evolved'...?

By who's order should any of this 'evolution' be dictated by...!?

And how can you say something is perfect in every way while also saying that parts of It need to be 'evolved' or 'changed'...!?

lol!

Why are you having such difficulty in reconciling both of these things...!?

by veya_victaous Fri Sep 18, 2015 12:19 am

SEXY MAMA wrote:
Cuchulain wrote:
SEXY MAMA wrote:

As I said earlier the relationship with God is NOT an equal one. How can it be? its not on equal terms at all.

You being an Atheist is pointless arguing about this with you.

Veya is not an athiest and that is a deflection to use.
I was once a believer as a Catholic.
The fact is there is no way such a deity is loving where it places conditions on love and that condition is a fear of eternal punishment.
If we as people create love, for parents do by creating children, then to do the same with punishments such as torture, we would lock them up for life.
Its also illogical for such a supreme being to be swayed by emoitions.

You really don't understand this do you?

This is why I said the relationship isn't a marriage one. Marriage is on equal terms.

This relationship isn't.

like Didge said I am not an Atheist (he knows It, there must be close to a dozen pages of arguments by now) I am agnostic because I willingly admit I have 'ideas' but I am unable to prove them true only that they are possible.

I may see the Sun and the great rainbow serpent (2 of my billions of 'gods') as vastly more powerful than me but there is still a decision by me to include their existence in my personal expatiation of reality. therefore it is a relationship of equals because I choose to believe in their existence, Like a love-match marriage I can spurn their attention I am not forced to be 'family' with any god.

another way of putting it
You can choose your religion just like you can choose your partner, you cant choose your parents however. Wink

by Tommy Monk Fri Sep 18, 2015 9:16 pm

Tommy Monk wrote:I understand my language perfectly... what I am struggling with is your use of It And what you are actually trying to say!

Something can only be said to have 'evolved' if there has been a significant change between the latter and the former...

So basically, you are saying that you want to see change in the proscribed punishments that are given in your guide book...

But trying to call this 'being evolved'...?

By who's order should any of this 'evolution' be dictated by...!?

And how can you say something is perfect in every way while also saying that parts of It need to be 'evolved' or 'changed'...!?

Why are you having such difficulty in reconciling both of these things...!?

Well SM...!?

Perfect or in need to be 'evolved' with changes!?

lol!

What was that you were saying about swines being unable to think for themselves...!?

You are a bigot among bigots... in fact of The most bigoted lot there are in the world!!!

by Sponsored content

non halal and syrian refugees

non halal and syrian refugees

Re: non halal and syrian refugees

Re: non halal and syrian refugees

Re: non halal and syrian refugees

Re: non halal and syrian refugees