Ex-Jehovah's Witness schoolgirl exposes organisation as a religion that 'destroys lives'

Belatucadros wrote:

heavenlyfatheragain wrote:
well as a serial dummy spitter you should really know...

I suggest if you are looking to start a fight on this thread and act also so immature as Quill did. Then just look in the mirror, as I am sure you will see someone matching your immaturity and angry behaviour. It will be an even match, so you can continue to abuse each other to your hearts content.

Enjoy

heavenlyfatheragain wrote:

Belatucadros wrote:

I suggest if you are looking to start a fight on this thread and act also so immature as Quill did. Then just look in the mirror, as I am sure you will see someone matching your immaturity and angry behaviour. It will be an even match, so you can continue to abuse each other to your hearts content.

Enjoy

I don't spit my dummy out, i don't usually quit and i don't change my name.

Raggamuffin wrote:I'd like to say at this point that I've never flounced or changed my username on this forum, even though there's clearly no such person as a real "ragamuffin" here.

Belatucadros wrote:

heavenlyfatheragain wrote:
I don't spit my dummy out, i don't usually quit and i don't change my name.

Well that is a lie as you have used other names as usernames and tried to sneak on forums after you have been banned using many names.
Like I say, if you are looking for a confrontation, all you need do is look in the mirror.
I suggest you move on.

heavenlyfatheragain wrote:

Belatucadros wrote:

Well that is a lie as you have used other names as usernames and tried to sneak on forums after you have been banned using many names.
Like I say, if you are looking for a confrontation, all you need do is look in the mirror.
I suggest you move on.

I have been banned , i have not left because i lost an argument..lol

heavenlyfatheragain wrote:

Belatucadros wrote:

Well that is a lie as you have used other names as usernames and tried to sneak on forums after you have been banned using many names.
Like I say, if you are looking for a confrontation, all you need do is look in the mirror.
I suggest you move on.

I have been banned , i have not left because i lost an argument..lol

Raggamuffin wrote:

heavenlyfatheragain wrote:
I have been banned , i have not left because i lost an argument..lol

Not from here surely.

Belatucadros wrote:

heavenlyfatheragain wrote:
I have been banned , i have not left because i lost an argument..lol

I have never left because of losing a debate or argument.
You have been banned though countless timesw because you are a vile low life.
I would rather be a person passionate who leaves because of may passions, than the fact you will always be vile and constantly banned for that.

Take it as you will, but you are a stain onto Christianity itself and to the teachings of Jesus and if Satan exists, he seriously had your place ear marked long ago.

heavenlyfatheragain wrote:

Belatucadros wrote:

I have never left because of losing a debate or argument.
You have been banned though countless timesw because you are a vile low life.
I would rather be a person passionate who leaves because of may passions, than the fact you will always be vile and constantly banned for that.

Take it as you will, but you are a stain onto Christianity itself and to the teachings of Jesus and if Satan exists, he seriously had your place ear marked long ago.

yes you have time and time again... lol how would you know the teachings of Jesus..lol

heavenlyfatheragain wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

Not from here surely.

yeah got banned from here, sky, ado, volcan.. forget the full name..

Raggamuffin wrote:

heavenlyfatheragain wrote:
yeah got banned from here, sky, ado, volcan.. forget the full name..

Why were you banned from here? I don't remember that.

heavenlyfatheragain wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

Why were you banned from here? I don't remember that.

i think the queers ganged up, to be honest I can't remember...

people make debate forums but when it seems you cannot be brow beaten they ban you as that is the only way they get the last word..

Original Quill wrote:

heavenlyfatheragain wrote:
i think the queers ganged up, to be honest I can't remember...

people make debate forums but when it seems you cannot be brow beaten they ban you as that is the only way they get the last word..

I don't remember you being banned, either.  Without meaning to sound hurtful, your posts just are not important enough to stir any passion.  Your style is declarative, not rational.  You don't like gays--so what?

So there's nothing to debate.  When you don't cause controversy, for whatever reason, you don't get banned.

heavenlyfatheragain wrote:

Original Quill wrote:

I don't remember you being banned, either.  Without meaning to sound hurtful, your posts just are not important enough to stir any passion.  Your style is declarative, not rational.  You don't like gays--so what?

So there's nothing to debate.  When you don't cause controversy, for whatever reason, you don't get banned.

not agreeing with people in control is controversial enough, when they cannot get the better of you it is the only way to win...

Original Quill wrote:

heavenlyfatheragain wrote:
not agreeing with people in control is controversial enough, when they cannot get the better of you it is the only way to win...

Yeah but...ben is the most laid back, hands-off admin I've ever seen.    The minions argue more about rules around here.

Vicar of Dibley wrote:

Original Quill wrote:

Yeah but...ben is the most laid back, hands-off admin I've ever seen.    The minions argue more about rules around here.

eddie asked me to come back and i said i can't because Ben has banned us so she asked him if he would lift the ban and apparently he forgot he had done it.

Vicar of Dibley wrote:

Original Quill wrote:

Yeah but...ben is the most laid back, hands-off admin I've ever seen.    The minions argue more about rules around here.

eddie asked me to come back and i said i can't because Ben has banned us so she asked him if he would lift the ban and apparently he forgot he had done it.

Raggamuffin wrote:

Vicar of Dibley wrote:

eddie asked me to come back and i said i can't because Ben has banned us so she asked him if he would lift the ban and apparently he forgot he had done it.

So is your old account still here?

I don't remember him saying you were banned.

Raggamuffin wrote:

Vicar of Dibley wrote:

eddie asked me to come back and i said i can't because Ben has banned us so she asked him if he would lift the ban and apparently he forgot he had done it.

So is your old account still here?

I don't remember him saying you were banned.

Original Quill wrote:

Vicar of Dibley wrote:

eddie asked me to come back and i said i can't because Ben has banned us so she asked him if he would lift the ban and apparently he forgot he had done it.

What was the problem, flatulence?    Maybe eds knows more about it.  I just thought you were having more fun on FLAP.

Vicar of Dibley wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

So is your old account still here?

I don't remember him saying you were banned.

I don't think it is because i re registered in the same name and it wouldn't have let me if it was still on here , we were banned for sure .

Vicar of Dibley wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

So is your old account still here?

I don't remember him saying you were banned.

I don't think it is because i re registered in the same name and it wouldn't have let me if it was still on here , we were banned for sure .

Vicar of Dibley wrote:

Original Quill wrote:

What was the problem, flatulence?    Maybe eds knows more about it.  I just thought you were having more fun on FLAP.

Not a member on flap .

Original Quill wrote:

Vicar of Dibley wrote:

I don't think it is because i re registered in the same name and it wouldn't have let me if it was still on here , we were banned for sure .

Not necessarily so.  Admin can set up the protocols anyway it wants.

Frankly, I doubt you were banned.  What evidence do you have?

heavenlyfatheragain wrote:

Original Quill wrote:

Not necessarily so.  Admin can set up the protocols anyway it wants.

Frankly, I doubt you were banned.  What evidence do you have?

what has it got to do with you!!!

veya_victaous wrote:

Tommy Monk wrote:
Firstly, I do not read 'hate sites'!
So have you made up all this hate yourself???        


Secondly, all the stories of Jesus are full of peace, love, goodness, honesty, truth, he healed the sick and fed the poor.\
And chasing people around with a whip  


Thirdly, all The stories of Mohammed are full of war, murder, robbery, rape, death and destruction, conquest for power and control, lies and deceit.
Okay present one    they are on hate sites NOT in the Koran

All of this is well documented...

Why lie...?

Belatucadros wrote:
A schoolgirl who left the Jehovah’s Witnesses after learning of its alleged failure to protect vulnerable women has blasted the organisation in a powerful speech to her classmates. Holding back tears, she recalled her personal experiences as a member of the church and how she was taught everyone outside the religion, including her father, would be sent to Armageddon.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/exjehovahs-witness-schoolgirl-exposes-organisation-as-a-religion-that-destroys-lives-10273064.html

heavenlyfatheragain wrote:who needs hate sites with Muslims the news and news papers give us all the info we need..

Original Quill wrote:

Vicar of Dibley wrote:

Not a member on flap .

Nor am I, tho I like Dean.  He is a member over here, now.

Original Quill wrote:

heavenlyfatheragain wrote:
what has it got to do with you!!!

Ben is my friend, and I care about the way this site is operated.  I know it is quite open and liberal in its operation.

The more I hear about it, the more I think VOD is mistaken.  I could be mistaken, but that's not what I'm hearing.

Vicar of Dibley wrote:

Original Quill wrote:

Ben is my friend, and I care about the way this site is operated.  I know it is quite open and liberal in its operation.

The more I hear about it, the more I think VOD is mistaken.  I could be mistaken, but that's not what I'm hearing.

We were banned our IP address was banned , eddie asked me on facebook if i was going to come back i said i can't Ben banned the ip address . She said she would ask him to lift the ban he said yes and he forgot he had banned us , also he said he didn't mind us re joining he just doesn't want andrea boreman or phil back .

Vicar of Dibley wrote:

Original Quill wrote:

Vicar of Dibley wrote:

Not a member on flap .

Nor am I, tho I like Dean.  He is a member over here, now.

I didn't know that what's his name here ?

Ben_Reilly wrote:

Vicar of Dibley wrote:

I didn't know that what's his name here ?

He's "The Devil You Know."

If your IP was banned, it was part of an effort to get rid of anything that might allow AB or Phil to get back on. You and HF were always welcome back. In fact, the only people who aren't welcome anymore are her and Phil, not in that order to say the least. AB has problems but Phil is the most hateful person I've ever encountered.

I might bark at you and HF quite a bit, but I do value your presence here and that's why even if you choose to leave sometimes, I and the other admins leave the door open. That's because I think that all viewpoints that can't withstand criticism are weak.