excellent natural preventative, even cure for prostate cancer

Raggamuffin wrote:

Ben_Reilly wrote:

OK, so from now on, I expect you to jump in and say that only one member is allowed to disagree with a thread topic at a time.

And it's my right to criticize religion.

You're Christianophobic - a bigot. This has nothing to do with religion, but you used it to mock.

heavenlyfatheragain wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

Me and old 'fartface tag-teaming is pathetic, and my using fake religious "faith" to score points is even worse.

it shows I cannot win a debate any other way...lol

Raggamuffin wrote:

Ben_Reilly wrote:

I'm not a bigot against Christians, I think ALL faiths are bogus

You, on the other hand, never seem to have a word to say about people making all Muslims out to be terrorists. So I'd say I'm a bit more fair on the topic than you.

You spend enough time defending Islam.

Stuff you - bigot.

Ben_Reilly wrote:

heavenlyfatheragain wrote:where were we , oh yes Ben so do you agree with the control of information concerning health...?

I agree with presenting solid evidence that a supplement doesn't cure, but rather can cause, cancer. I believe it can keep people from getting sick.  ::D:: 

heavenlyfatheragain wrote:

Ben_Reilly wrote:

heavenlyfatheragain wrote:where were we , oh yes Ben so do you agree with the control of information concerning health...?

I agree with presenting solid evidence that a supplement doesn't cure, but rather can cause, cancer. I believe it can keep people from getting sick.  ::D:: 

so you are against freedom of choice, speech and information, thank you for being honest...  

Sassy wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

You spend enough time defending Islam.

Stuff you - bigot.

You ever had cancer Rags?   I have, twice, still got one, despise people like HF, because not only does he promote 'cures' that have been proven to be useless or dangerous, he then hides behind his religion when challenged.   I know how dangerous his information is and I will show him up in any way possible.

Raggamuffin wrote:

Sassy wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

You spend enough time defending Islam.

Stuff you - bigot.

You ever had cancer Rags?   I have, twice, still got one, despise people like HF, because not only does he promote 'cures' that have been proven to be useless or dangerous, he then hides behind his religion when challenged.   I know how dangerous his information is and I will show him up in any way possible.

He didn't mention religion - you and Ben are using it to score points. Shame on you both.

Raggamuffin wrote:

Sassy wrote:

You ever had cancer Rags?   I have, twice, still got one, despise people like HF, because not only does he promote 'cures' that have been proven to be useless or dangerous, he then hides behind his religion when challenged.   I know how dangerous his information is and I will show him up in any way possible.

He didn't mention religion - you and Ben are using it to score points. Shame on you both.

Ben_Reilly wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

He didn't mention religion - you and Ben are using it to score points. Shame on you both.

Still waiting for you to show me where I've ever defended Islam.

Raggamuffin wrote:

Ben_Reilly wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

He didn't mention religion - you and Ben are using it to score points. Shame on you both.

Still waiting for you to show me where I've ever defended Islam.

Get a better search function, and I will.

Ben_Reilly wrote:

heavenlyfatheragain wrote:

so you are against freedom of choice, speech and information, thank you for being honest...  

Classic.

heavenlyfatheragain wrote:

Ben_Reilly wrote:

heavenlyfatheragain wrote:

so you are against freedom of choice, speech and information, thank you for being honest...  

Classic.

you have shown tonight you are against freedom of information by moving the topic as you decided it is not health...

you wanted to stop the thread, so you have shown you are against freedom of speech...

without the information or even the right to discuss it you must be against freedom of choice.... how can they chose if they have no knowledge it exists..

there you are judge , jury and executioner deciding who should live and die...

heck of a responsibility don't you think.....

heavenlyfatheragain wrote:

Ben_Reilly wrote:


Please don't place these non-news quack "cures" for cancer in Science. They don't belong here and they will always be moved to "Weird News."

i thought this category said health but hey i guess you know best....  

Ben_Reilly wrote:

heavenlyfatheragain wrote:

you have shown tonight you are against freedom of information by moving the topic as you decided it is not health...

you wanted to stop the thread, so you have shown you are against freedom of speech...

without the information or even the right to discuss it you must be against freedom of choice.... how can they chose if they have no knowledge it exists..

there you are judge , jury and executioner deciding who should live and die...

heck of a responsibility don't you think.....

Yes, I'm trying to bury the thread by commenting to everything said on it, practically. Diabolical genius that I am  ::D:: 

heavenlyfatheragain wrote:

Ben_Reilly wrote:

Yes, I'm trying to bury the thread by commenting to everything said on it, practically. Diabolical genius that I am  ::D:: 

you decided it was not a health thread.. of course you wanted it ridiculed because you do not agree with it...  

no freedom of speech, choice or information....

a dictatorship....   

heavenlyfatheragain wrote:

heavenlyfatheragain wrote:

you decided it was not a health thread.. of course you wanted it ridiculed because you do not agree with it...  

no freedom of speech, choice or information....

a dictatorship....   

I wouldn't want the death of people on my conscience just because i decided they didn't need to know....  

Ben_Reilly wrote:If you don't want dead people on your conscience, HF, don't promote taking supplements that are proven to cause cancer. Simple!

heavenlyfatheragain wrote:

Ben_Reilly wrote:

Classic.

you have shown tonight you are against freedom of information by moving the topic as you decided it is not health...

you wanted to stop the thread, so you have shown you are against freedom of speech...

without the information or even the right to discuss it you must be against freedom of choice.... how can they chose if they have no knowledge it exists..

there you are judge , jury and executioner deciding who should live and die...

heck of a responsibility don't you think.....

Lone Wolf wrote:

heavenlyfatheragain wrote:

you have shown tonight you are against freedom of information by moving the topic as you decided it is not health...

you wanted to stop the thread, so you have shown you are against freedom of speech...

without the information or even the right to discuss it you must be against freedom of choice.... how can they chose if they have no knowledge it exists..

there you are judge , jury and executioner deciding who should live and die...

heck of a responsibility don't you think.....

  

ZERO facts.

ZERO science.

ZERO "health" benefits..

WHAT exactly is it that old 'fartface is peddling ???

ANSWER: fake useless quackery. That's most likely VoD's great little home based business !   

heavenlyfatheragain wrote:

Ben_Reilly wrote:If you don't want dead people on your conscience, HF, don't promote taking supplements that are proven to cause cancer. Simple!

I would sooner everyone died from my fraudulnt "information", unlike you i couldn't and wouldn't choose what we can and cannot read.

My conscience would be whacked because everyone could get all the faked "information" they requsted and make an grossly mis-informed decision on their own life, we will point them too our obvious poisons, cutting out irradiation and no other alternatives...

heavenlyfatheragain wrote:

Ben_Reilly wrote:If you don't want dead people on your conscience, HF, don't promote taking supplements that are proven to cause cancer. Simple!

I would sooner everyone had ll the information, unlike you i couldn't and wouldn't choose what people can and cannot research.

My conscience would be clear because everyone could get all the information they required and make an informed decision on their own life, yours would point them too the obvious, poisons, cutting out or irradiation and no other alternative... because you decided they are best for them...  

Lone Wolf wrote:

heavenlyfatheragain wrote:

I would sooner everyone died from my fraudulnt "information", unlike you i couldn't and wouldn't choose what we can and cannot read.

My conscience would be whacked because everyone could get all the faked "information" they requsted and make an grossly mis-informed decision on their own life, we will point them too our obvious poisons, cutting out irradiation and no other alternatives...

  the kangaroo did take the piss out of my microdick by the way.. 

heavenlyfatheragain wrote:

Ben_Reilly wrote:

I agree with presenting solid evidence that a supplement doesn't cure, but rather can cause, cancer. I believe it can keep people from getting sick.  ::D:: 

so you are against freedom of choice, speech and information, thank you for being honest...  

lovedust wrote:

heavenlyfatheragain wrote:

so you are against freedom of choice, speech and information, thank you for being honest...  

Misinformation surely? You wouldn't encourage someone to jump off a cliff reassuring them it wasn't dangerous, so why would you tell a cancer patient they can be cured with selenium?

Tommy Monk wrote:I've read that nuts are good protection.....
And walnutp can prevent further growth and spread.

heavenlyfatheragain wrote:

I would sooner everyone had no information,  i can and will choose what people can and cannot read..



please ignore my microdick -  I'm just a sad and lonely little WANKER.... 

and my cheap little wife is out selling herself for two quid in the town square, AGAIN..    

 

Lone Wolf wrote:

I would sooner everyone had no information,  i can and will choose what people can and cannot read..



please ignore my microdick -  I'm just a sad and lonely little WANKER.... 

and my cheap little wife who is a kangaroo is out selling herself for two quid in the town square, AGAIN..    

 

victorisnotamused wrote:NO moron it isnt ...it is EXPLOITATION of people with terminal illnesses....

90% of people wouldnt be able to properly compare two treatments, nor understand the benefits/disbenefits in PROPER terms...

moreover that SHIT you posted about selenium DOES NOT contain ANY  of the required information needed to make an informed choice...even IF the reader had the requisite medical and phisiological knowlege.

It is a SCAM through and through...It tells you NOTHING and makes (proven) nonsensical promises which it cant live up to.

You may be immoral enough to hide behind your "i believe in jesus" crap, but and make a profit from peoples suffering, with your lies and false pseudo religion. But that doesnt make you "saved" at all......

heavenlyfatheragain wrote:

lovedust wrote:

heavenlyfatheragain wrote:

so you are against freedom of choice, speech and information, thank you for being honest...  

Misinformation surely? You wouldn't encourage someone to jump off a cliff reassuring them it wasn't dangerous, so why would you tell a cancer patient they can be cured with selenium?

you chose like ben to believe it is not good information, so you make the decision for them, give them the information and let them decide..

that is freedom...

Ben_Reilly wrote:

heavenlyfatheragain wrote:

you chose like ben to believe it is not good information, so you make the decision for them, give them the information and let them decide..

that is freedom...

It was a decision based on sound facts and evidence, clinical trials. This stuff is documented, HF. We didn't just flip a coin  ::D:: 

heavenlyfatheragain wrote:

victorisnotamused wrote:NO moron it isnt ...it is EXPLOITATION of people with terminal illnesses....

90% of people wouldnt be able to properly compare two treatments, nor understand the benefits/disbenefits in PROPER terms...

moreover that SHIT you posted about selenium DOES NOT contain ANY  of the required information needed to make an informed choice...even IF the reader had the requisite medical and phisiological knowlege.

It is a SCAM through and through...It tells you NOTHING and makes (proven) nonsensical promises which it cant live up to.

You may be immoral enough to hide behind your "i believe in jesus" crap, but and make a profit from peoples suffering, with your lies and false pseudo religion. But that doesnt make you "saved" at all......

oh another thick shit who doesn't want people to know the information...   another one who wants to be God and decide who should live and who should die...

heavenlyfatheragain wrote:

Ben_Reilly wrote:

heavenlyfatheragain wrote:

you chose like ben to believe it is not good information, so you make the decision for them, give them the information and let them decide..

that is freedom...

It was a decision based on sound facts and evidence, clinical trials. This stuff is documented, HF. We didn't just flip a coin  ::D:: 

you have chosen what to believe and would now force that belief on others, even if they die and you would chose to keep information from them...

heavenlyfatheragain wrote:

victorisnotamused wrote:NO moron it isnt ...it is EXPLOITATION of people with terminal illnesses....

90% of people wouldnt be able to properly compare two treatments, nor understand the benefits/disbenefits in PROPER terms...

moreover that SHIT you posted about selenium DOES NOT contain ANY  of the required information needed to make an informed choice...even IF the reader had the requisite medical and phisiological knowlege.

It is a SCAM through and through...It tells you NOTHING and makes (proven) nonsensical promises which it cant live up to.

You may be immoral enough to hide behind your "i believe in jesus" crap, but and make a profit from peoples suffering, with your lies and false pseudo religion. But that doesnt make you "saved" at all......

oh another thick shit who doesn't want people to know the information...   another one who wants to be God and decide who should live and who should die...

victorisnotamused wrote:

heavenlyfatheragain wrote:

oh another thick shit who doesn't want people to know the information...   another one who wants to be God and decide who should live and who should die...

If I had THAT power...you would be in the second category believe me

Sassy wrote:

Tommy Monk wrote:I've read that nuts are good protection.....
And walnutp can prevent further growth and spread.

That's been scientifically proven, they have had trials, walnuts will help your heart as well.

Tommy Monk wrote:

Sassy wrote:

Tommy Monk wrote:I've read that nuts are good protection.....
And walnutp can prevent further growth and spread.

That's been scientifically proven, they have had trials, walnuts will help your heart as well.

Yes Sassy, I believe so, walnuts in particular but any nuts are good for you..... as long as They are not covered in too much salt!!!
Walnuts also good for the brain as well as almonds which can lift mood.
Interesting read....
"Asian parents often give their children almonds on exam days. This is with good reason: Compounds found in almonds help regulate the production of an important hormone in the brain called dopamine...."
http://healthmunsta.hubpages.com/hub/Best-Nuts-for-Health

victorisnotamused wrote:NO i want PROPER information.....not that shit YOU promulgate....so now you are a liar as well...nice

as I said....90% of people dont have the requisite knowlege, (and thus need the help of trained personell to make such a decision...)

the carp YOU post DOES NOT have the required information

so personally I would have your sort rounded up and used in live experiments to test the eficacy of the shit you promote.....after all...we would then HAVE the information we need......  

heavenlyfatheragain wrote:yes much better the people don't know, because some mindless morons have decided they know what is best for everyone...

as i said my conscience is clear I want everyone to know all the possible facts not lead them by the hand to their death... in ignorance...