labour scum/paedophile scum/gay scum

First topic message reminder :

How three of the party's most senior figures campaigned for a vile paedophile group now being probed by police for 'abusing children on an industrial scale'

By Guy Adams

PUBLISHED: 23:32, 18 February 2014  | UPDATED: 09:03, 19 February 2014


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2562555/Labours-child-sex-apologists-How-three-partys-senior-figures-campaigned-vile-paedophile-group-probed-police-abusing-children-industrial-scale.html#ixzz2tlCL4nRL
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook


Appearing in the pages of a Left-wing magazine called Rights, it was, by any account, an extraordinary letter.

Written by one Mike Morten, who lived in London and described himself as 'Both a Paedophile and Gay', the letter complained that laws forbidding him from having sex with children ‘interfere with my life and civil liberties’.

‘Consensual sex between adults and children is simply people of different age groups being nice to each other,’ it argued.
Morten then criticised recent newspaper articles which had described perpetrators of child sex offences as ‘molesters’.
( all this from a Gay Paedophile )


‘This is a loaded and pejorative term,’ he declared. ‘It’s a totally inaccurate description of us, and a put-down, in much the same way that “pansy” is a put-down of gays and “n*****” a put-down of blacks.’


I rest my case.

scrat wrote:

Catman wrote:

He really is a vile old man Scrat.

You do a grand job at holding him to account!

 

Thanks Phil,

If M'lud had a shred of decency he would offer an apology.

I agree, but he hasn't, i'm afraid.

Catman wrote:

scrat wrote:
Your hypocrisy knows no bounds M'lud.

https://newsfix.niceboard.com/t2594-are-young-black-men-born-to-be-violent-criminals#40698


just as Everyone knows that there is a suspicion of kiddie fiddling in you past and you support some of the radical ideas proposed by perverts.

_________________
GAY DOES NOT EQUAL HAPPY

Perhaps you should just go back to producing propaganda for the BNP,,,,M'lud, at least that would be representing your views honestly.

He really is a vile old man Scrat.

You do a grand job at holding him to account!

 

it takes one to know one.

scrat wrote:

Fred Moletrousers wrote:

To implythat another poster is a paedophile or even that he is "obsessed" by the subject to an "unwholesome or unhealthy" degree really is beyond the pale.

I suggest that you are not looking up at the stars, but down into the slime.

Your hypocrisy knows no bounds M'lud.

https://newsfix.niceboard.com/t2594-are-young-black-men-born-to-be-violent-criminals#40698


just as Everyone knows that there is a suspicion of kiddie fiddling in you past and you support some of the radical ideas proposed by perverts.

_________________
GAY DOES NOT EQUAL HAPPY

Perhaps you should just go back to producing propaganda for the BNP,,,,M'lud, at least that would be representing your views honestly.

You had better be prepared to back up that filthy, disgusting, totally untrue and serious allegation.

mark these words from a GAY PAEDOPHILE


Consensual sex between adults and children is simply people of different age groups being nice to each other,’ it argued.
Morten then criticised recent newspaper articles which had described perpetrators of child sex offences as ‘molesters’.

Catman wrote:

scrat wrote:
Thanks Phil,

If M'lud had a shred of decency he would offer an apology.

I agree, but he hasn't, i'm afraid.

unfortunately M'lud has a long history of cowardice and treachery, his lies and smears are sadly notorious in another place.

Puriel wrote:mark these words from a GAY PAEDOPHILE


Consensual sex between adults and children is simply people of different age groups being nice to each other,’ it argued.
Morten then criticised recent newspaper articles which had described perpetrators of child sex offences as ‘molesters’.

You should be banned.

scrat wrote:

Catman wrote:

I agree, but he hasn't, i'm afraid.

unfortunately M'lud has a long history of cowardice and treachery, his lies and smears are sadly notorious in another place.

So i have read Scrat!

Catman wrote:

Puriel wrote:mark these words from a GAY PAEDOPHILE


Consensual sex between adults and children is simply people of different age groups being nice to each other,’ it argued.
Morten then criticised recent newspaper articles which had described perpetrators of child sex offences as ‘molesters’.

You should be banned.

For quoting the report in a news article , ffs get a life.

scrat wrote:

Catman wrote:

I agree, but he hasn't, i'm afraid.

unfortunately M'lud has a long history of cowardice and treachery, his lies and smears are sadly notorious in another place.

Scrat you really shouldn't be feeding the little troll he is bad enough. Moletrouser is one of the best posters around anyone including us left wingers can see that. Poor form you are winding to cause trouble.

And still no word from the Labour supporters of why they are not demanding the party make clear and transparent investigations and explanations of their support for paedophile groups and apologize for said support even if it was given in innocence and ignorance.

Puriel wrote:

Catman wrote:

You should be banned.

For quoting the report in a news article , ffs get a life.

You've broken the header rule for a start.

sphinx wrote:And still no word from the Labour supporters of why they are not demanding the party make clear and transparent investigations and explanations of their support for paedophile groups and apologize for said support even if it was given in innocence and ignorance.

can you wait till hell freezes over ?

Catman wrote:

Puriel wrote:mark these words from a GAY PAEDOPHILE


Consensual sex between adults and children is simply people of different age groups being nice to each other,’ it argued.
Morten then criticised recent newspaper articles which had described perpetrators of child sex offences as ‘molesters’.

You should be banned.

Is this your total purpose in life to get anyone banned who you don't think is close enough to your bile ridden spoutings. Please deal with the posts not the posters this is outrageous behaviour.

Phoenix wrote:

scrat wrote:
unfortunately M'lud has a long history of cowardice and treachery, his lies and smears are sadly notorious in another place.

Scrat you really shouldn't be feeding the little troll he is bad enough. Moletrouser is one of the best posters around anyone including us left wingers can see that. Poor form you are winding to cause trouble.

Shut it Drinky.

Catman wrote:

Puriel wrote:


For quoting the report in a news article , ffs get a life.

You've broken the header rule for a start.

as self appointed site admin can you point out which part of the headline is not allowed ?

Puriel wrote:

sphinx wrote:And still no word from the Labour supporters of why they are not demanding the party make clear and transparent investigations and explanations of their support for paedophile groups and apologize for said support even if it was given in innocence and ignorance.

can you wait till hell freezes over ?

I am beginning to wonder if I am typing in invisible ink .................

Puriel wrote:

Catman wrote:

You've broken the header rule for a start.

as self appointed site admin can you point out which part of the headline is not allowed ?

I think Ben explained the rules in the announcements section, which you read and then broke.

scrat wrote:

Fred Moletrousers wrote:

To implythat another poster is a paedophile or even that he is "obsessed" by the subject to an "unwholesome or unhealthy" degree really is beyond the pale.

I suggest that you are not looking up at the stars, but down into the slime.

Your hypocrisy knows no bounds M'lud.

https://newsfix.niceboard.com/t2594-are-young-black-men-born-to-be-violent-criminals#40698


just as Everyone knows that there is a suspicion of kiddie fiddling in you past and you support some of the radical ideas proposed by perverts.

_________________
GAY DOES NOT EQUAL HAPPY

Perhaps you should just go back to producing propaganda for the BNP,,,,M'lud, at least that would be representing your views honestly.

The attempts at character assassination to divert from the thread is appallingly bad form Scrat. This blatant libel about another decent poster and McCalpine who was cleared in every sense is despicable.

I am having serious doubts about this forum if this is the way you deal with anyone who does not share a left wing view.

Phoenix wrote:

scrat wrote:
unfortunately M'lud has a long history of cowardice and treachery, his lies and smears are sadly notorious in another place.

Scrat you really shouldn't be feeding the little troll he is bad enough. Moletrouser is one of the best posters around anyone including us left wingers can see that. Poor form you are winding to cause trouble.

Are you referring to Puerile, he's only a thickcunt, don't be too harsh, as for M'lud, he gets down and dirty with the rest of us, the fact that he's now been exposed as a coward, a liar, a traitor and a hypocrite was simply a matter of inevitability.

sphinx wrote:

Puriel wrote:



can you wait till hell freezes over ?

I am beginning to wonder if I am typing in invisible ink .................

there are none so blind as those that cannot see.

Phoenix wrote:

scrat wrote:
Your hypocrisy knows no bounds M'lud.

https://newsfix.niceboard.com/t2594-are-young-black-men-born-to-be-violent-criminals#40698


just as Everyone knows that there is a suspicion of kiddie fiddling in you past and you support some of the radical ideas proposed by perverts.

_________________
GAY DOES NOT EQUAL HAPPY

Perhaps you should just go back to producing propaganda for the BNP,,,,M'lud, at least that would be representing your views honestly.

The attempts at character assassination to divert from the thread is appallingly bad form Scrat. This blatant libel about another decent poster and McCalpine who was cleared in every sense is despicable.

I am having serious doubts about this forum if this is the way you deal with anyone who does not share a left wing view.

  

The mask slips ever so slightly.
Wanker.

Catman wrote:

Puriel wrote:



as self appointed site admin can you point out which part of the headline is not allowed ?

I think Ben explained the rules in the announcements section, which you read and then broke.

I think it is clear you are the most guilty of rule breaking and fermenting trouble on here. I am stopping posting for a while not because of your foul mouth but because I don't want to be associated with such behaviour masquerading as decent left wing thought.

Catman wrote:

Puriel wrote:



as self appointed site admin can you point out which part of the headline is not allowed ?

I think Ben explained the rules in the announcements section, which you read and then broke.

the rules change daily ,it is hard to keep up with them.

Phoenix wrote:

Catman wrote:

I think Ben explained the rules in the announcements section, which you read and then broke.

I think it is clear you are the most guilty of rule breaking and fermenting trouble on here. I am stopping posting for a while not because of your foul mouth but because I don't want to be associated with such behaviour masquerading as decent left wing thought.

You are stopping posting for a while because your mask is slipping, and when it does your ass is history!   

getting back on topic which is about three senior Labourites and their agenda on supporting and encouraging Paedophiles



Documents found by Mail show link between Left-wing and paedophiles
Harriet Harman, Jack Dromey and Patricia Hewitt held senior positions at National Council for Civil Liberties before rising to top of the Labour party
The NCCL was an 'affiliate' of the Paedophile Information Exchange (PIE), whose members may have abused children on an 'industrial scale'
Paperwork reveals NCCL helped lobby Parliament for the age of sexual consent to be cut to as low as ten and

So if the Labour supporters are not explaining why they are not demanding explanations and apologies from their party does that mean that in reality they all secretly support Labours support for paedophile groups seeking to normalize sexual contact with children?

sphinx wrote:So if the Labour supporters are not explaining why they are not demanding explanations and apologies from their party does that mean that in reality they all secretly support Labours support for paedophile groups seeking to normalize sexual contact with children?

the LW are like cultists they will never admit to being wrong.

Puriel wrote:getting back on topic which is about three senior Labourites and their agenda on supporting and encouraging Paedophiles



Documents found by Mail show link between Left-wing and paedophiles
Harriet Harman, Jack Dromey and Patricia Hewitt held senior positions at National Council for Civil Liberties before rising to top of the Labour party
The NCCL was an 'affiliate' of the Paedophile Information Exchange (PIE), whose members may have abused children on an 'industrial scale'
Paperwork reveals NCCL helped lobby Parliament for the age of sexual consent to be cut to as low as ten and

Surely you did not intend the loony Left in this forum to address the topic seriously, did you?

Scrat, the proven liar, cheat, fraudster and post fiddler, reacted in his usual diversionary manner by dragging up yet again the old and thoroughly discredited lie about Lord MacAlpine and then, when that clearly was not working out for him, accusing myself and another poster of being paedophiles.

Were he the sort of person that anyone took in the slightest seriously or regarded as even the most insignificant of threats, I might even have been annoyed.

I would imagine that even his mentors, the professional Labour liars Whelan and MacBride, must despair of him. Utterly bloody useless is the description that springs immediately to mind...though for some, I suppose, he offers some sort of perverted entertainment value.

Naturally, Scrat was backed up by that so-called "militant homosexual" and the forum's resident idiot Catweazle...the whingeing, whining, foot-stamping and infantile moron who bores everyone to racking sobs about his sexuality and then squeals like a stuck pig whenever anyone else dares to mention it.

Perhaps he is of the Jewish faith. If so, all I can think is that the Rabbi threw the wrong bit into the garbage bin after his circumcision.

Puriel wrote:getting back on topic which is about three senior Labourites and their agenda on supporting and encouraging Paedophiles



Documents found by Mail show link between Left-wing and paedophiles
Harriet Harman, Jack Dromey and Patricia Hewitt held senior positions at National Council for Civil Liberties before rising to top of the Labour party
The NCCL was an 'affiliate' of the Paedophile Information Exchange (PIE), whose members may have abused children on an 'industrial scale'
Paperwork reveals NCCL helped lobby Parliament for the age of sexual consent to be cut to as low as ten and

NCCl was renamed " Liberty "................good choice of name considering

Phoenix wrote:

scrat wrote:
Your hypocrisy knows no bounds M'lud.

https://newsfix.niceboard.com/t2594-are-young-black-men-born-to-be-violent-criminals#40698


just as Everyone knows that there is a suspicion of kiddie fiddling in you past and you support some of the radical ideas proposed by perverts.

_________________
GAY DOES NOT EQUAL HAPPY

Perhaps you should just go back to producing propaganda for the BNP,,,,M'lud, at least that would be representing your views honestly.

The attempts at character assassination to divert from the thread is appallingly bad form Scrat. This blatant libel about another decent poster and McCalpine who was cleared in every sense is despicable.

I am having serious doubts about this forum if this is the way you deal with anyone who does not share a left wing view.

Well, it appears that Ben has ridden in on his white horse and deleted the evidence, so which way will your serious doubts swing now?

Fred Moletrousers wrote:

Puriel wrote:getting back on topic which is about three senior Labourites and their agenda on supporting and encouraging Paedophiles



Documents found by Mail show link between Left-wing and paedophiles
Harriet Harman, Jack Dromey and Patricia Hewitt held senior positions at National Council for Civil Liberties before rising to top of the Labour party
The NCCL was an 'affiliate' of the Paedophile Information Exchange (PIE), whose members may have abused children on an 'industrial scale'
Paperwork reveals NCCL helped lobby Parliament for the age of sexual consent to be cut to as low as ten and

Surely you did not intend the loony Left in this forum to address the topic seriously, did you?


its called living in hope

Scrat, the proven liar, cheat, fraudster and post fiddler, reacted in his usual diversionary manner by dragging up yet again the old and thoroughly discredited lie about Lord MacAlpine and then, when that clearly was not working out for him, accusing myself and another poster of being paedophiles.

Were he the sort of person that anyone took in the slightest seriously or regarded as even the most insignificant of threats, I might even have been annoyed.

I would imagine that even his mentors, the professional Labour liars Whelan and MacBride, must despair of him. Utterly bloody useless is the description that springs immediately to mind...though for some, I suppose, he offers some sort of  perverted entertainment value.

Naturally, Scrat was backed up by that so-called "militant homosexual" and the forum's resident idiot Catweazle...the whingeing, whining, foot-stamping and infantile moron who bores everyone to racking sobs about his sexuality and then squeals like a stuck pig whenever anyone else dares to mention it.
cannot comment on Catty he has the sites Dons protection
Perhaps he is of the Jewish faith. If so, all I can think is that the Rabbi threw the wrong bit into the garbage bin after his circumcision.
scrat could be described as a bit of a foreskin

  

Catman wrote:

Phoenix wrote:

The attempts at character assassination to divert from the thread is appallingly bad form Scrat. This blatant libel about another decent poster and McCalpine who was cleared in every sense is despicable.

I am having serious doubts about this forum if this is the way you deal with anyone who does not share a left wing view.

  

The mask slips ever so slightly.
Wanker.

Why do you not totter along and do something more appropriate to your abilities...such as masquerading as a dog turd in the gutter. You appear to have plenty of experience.

Fred Moletrousers wrote:

Catman wrote:

  

The mask slips ever so slightly.
Wanker.

Why do you not totter along and do something more appropriate to your abilities...such as masquerading as a dog turd in the gutter. You appear to have plenty of experience.

fuck off you stupid old hypocrite.

Fred Moletrousers wrote:

Puriel wrote:getting back on topic which is about three senior Labourites and their agenda on supporting and encouraging Paedophiles



Documents found by Mail show link between Left-wing and paedophiles
Harriet Harman, Jack Dromey and Patricia Hewitt held senior positions at National Council for Civil Liberties before rising to top of the Labour party
The NCCL was an 'affiliate' of the Paedophile Information Exchange (PIE), whose members may have abused children on an 'industrial scale'
Paperwork reveals NCCL helped lobby Parliament for the age of sexual consent to be cut to as low as ten and

Surely you did not intend the loony Left in this forum to address the topic seriously, did you?

Scrat, the proven liar, cheat, fraudster and post fiddler, reacted in his usual diversionary manner by dragging up yet again the old and thoroughly discredited lie about Lord MacAlpine and then, when that clearly was not working out for him,
Were he the sort of person that anyone took in the slightest seriously or regarded as even the most insignificant of threats, I might even have been annoyed.

I would imagine that even his mentors, the professional Labour liars Whelan and MacBride, must despair of him. Utterly bloody useless is the description that springs immediately to mind...though for some, I suppose, he offers some sort of  perverted entertainment value.

Naturally, Scrat was backed up by that so-called "militant homosexual" and the forum's resident idiot Catweazle...the whingeing, whining, foot-stamping and infantile moron who bores everyone to racking sobs about his sexuality and then squeals like a stuck pig whenever anyone else dares to mention it.

Perhaps he is of the Jewish faith. If so, all I can think is that the Rabbi threw the wrong bit into the garbage bin after his circumcision.

I have edited this out M'lud "accusing myself and another poster of being paedophiles"

As it appears the forum host has deleted the offending article!

Deflections cannot hide these atrocities committed by Labour.

Catman wrote:

Fred Moletrousers wrote:

Why do you not totter along and do something more appropriate to your abilities...such as masquerading as a dog turd in the gutter. You appear to have plenty of experience.

fuck off you stupid old hypocrite.

I am sorry. I am deeply humiliated and contrite. I am distraught. I am bereft. My tears of misery and sorrow know no bounds.

So, I will apologise unreservedly....to dog turds.

No self-respecting dog turd should suffer the disgraceful insult of being likened to a piece of filth like you.

scrat wrote:

Fred Moletrousers wrote:

Surely you did not intend the loony Left in this forum to address the topic seriously, did you?

Scrat, the proven liar, cheat, fraudster and post fiddler, reacted in his usual diversionary manner by dragging up yet again the old and thoroughly discredited lie about Lord MacAlpine and then, when that clearly was not working out for him,
Were he the sort of person that anyone took in the slightest seriously or regarded as even the most insignificant of threats, I might even have been annoyed.

I would imagine that even his mentors, the professional Labour liars Whelan and MacBride, must despair of him. Utterly bloody useless is the description that springs immediately to mind...though for some, I suppose, he offers some sort of  perverted entertainment value.

Naturally, Scrat was backed up by that so-called "militant homosexual" and the forum's resident idiot Catweazle...the whingeing, whining, foot-stamping and infantile moron who bores everyone to racking sobs about his sexuality and then squeals like a stuck pig whenever anyone else dares to mention it.

Perhaps he is of the Jewish faith. If so, all I can think is that the Rabbi threw the wrong bit into the garbage bin after his circumcision.

I have edited this out M'lud "accusing myself and another poster of being paedophiles"


As it appears the forum host has deleted the offending article!

Not before I had taken copies of everything that was relevant, he didn't.

I take it that you do realise that accusing someone of paedophilia can constitute a criminal as well as a civil offence? Or that internet anonymity is no longer as "anonymous" as it once was.

Well done.

Fred Moletrousers wrote:

Catman wrote:

fuck off you stupid old hypocrite.

I am sorry. I am deeply humiliated and contrite. I am distraught. I am bereft. My tears of misery and sorrow know no bounds.

So, I will apologise unreservedly....to dog turds.

No self-respecting dog turd should suffer the disgraceful insult of being likened to a piece of filth like you.

Someone should do the world a favour and kick you down your septic tank, you vile RW scumbag.

Fred Moletrousers wrote:

scrat wrote:
I have edited this out M'lud "accusing myself and another poster of being paedophiles"


As it appears the forum host has deleted the offending article!

Not before I had taken copies of everything that was relevant, he didn't.

I take it that you do realise that accusing someone of paedophilia can constitute a criminal as well as a civil offence? Or that internet anonymity is no longer as "anonymous" as it once was.

Well done.

best to COPY posts on here as there is so much altering , mis-quoting and the dictorial deleting.

Puriel wrote:How three of the party's most senior figures campaigned for a vile paedophile group now being probed by police for 'abusing children on an industrial scale'

By Guy Adams

PUBLISHED: 23:32, 18 February 2014  | UPDATED: 09:03, 19 February 2014


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2562555/Labours-child-sex-apologists-How-three-partys-senior-figures-campaigned-vile-paedophile-group-probed-police-abusing-children-industrial-scale.html#ixzz2tlCL4nRL
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook


Appearing in the pages of a Left-wing magazine called Rights, it was, by any account, an extraordinary letter.

Written by one Mike Morten, who lived in London and described himself as 'Both a Paedophile and Gay', the letter complained that laws forbidding him from having sex with children ‘interfere with my life and civil liberties’.

‘Consensual sex between adults and children is simply people of different age groups being nice to each other,’ it argued.
Morten then criticised recent newspaper articles which had described perpetrators of child sex offences as ‘molesters’.

‘This is a loaded and pejorative term,’ he declared. ‘It’s a totally inaccurate description of us, and a put-down, in much the same way that “pansy” is a put-down of gays and “n*****” a put-down of blacks.’


I rest my case.

So after these revelations,combined with the general sickness that is left wingism who in their right mind would vote for & support Labour?

Still I suppose I'll never know the answer to that question because I am not a raving paedophile.

Catman wrote:

Fred Moletrousers wrote:

I am sorry. I am deeply humiliated and contrite. I am distraught. I am bereft. My tears of misery and sorrow know no bounds.

So, I will apologise unreservedly....to dog turds.

No self-respecting dog turd should suffer the disgraceful insult of being likened to a piece of filth like you.

Someone should do the world a favour and kick you down your septic tank, you vile RW scumbag.

I'm reserving that particular spot for you, Catvomit.

Catman wrote:

Fred Moletrousers wrote:

I am sorry. I am deeply humiliated and contrite. I am distraught. I am bereft. My tears of misery and sorrow know no bounds.

So, I will apologise unreservedly....to dog turds.

No self-respecting dog turd should suffer the disgraceful insult of being likened to a piece of filth like you.

Someone should do the world a favour and kick you down your septic tank, you vile RW scumbag.

I object to the term 'septic tank ' being used as this is a derogatory remark about our American cousins.

Puriel wrote:

scrat wrote:
actually it's a quote from Oscar Wilde, but you being a thick----, would fail grasp that!

not surprised that you would use a quote from a fellow pervert.

  

THE only reason that I can assume that both "Putrid" and "NoTrousers" are so openly and happily libelling various people on here today...

IS THAT neither of them has any actual money or worthwhile assets to their names !!
SO they don't have anything to worry about losing the day somebody finally ups and sues them.   

Puriel wrote:

Catman wrote:

Someone should do the world a favour and kick you down your septic tank, you vile RW scumbag.

I object to the term 'septic tank ' being used as this is a derogatory remark about our American cousins.

I just call mine the "sh*t pit." It's best to be ultra careful with terminology these days; whatever you say is bound to "offend" somebody or another.

Beekeeper wrote:

Puriel wrote:

not surprised that you would use a quote from a fellow pervert.

  

THE only reason that I can assume that both "Putrid" and "NoTrousers" are so openly and happily libelling various people on here today...

IS THAT neither of them has any actual money or worthwhile assets to their names !!
SO they don't have anything to worry about losing the day somebody finally ups and sues them.   

Oh, boy...would you be surprised!

And perhaps you hadn't noticed, but your little Left Wing playmates are the ones who have been doing the libelling.

However, I graciously excuse your deficiency in the art of comprehension on the grounds of semi-literacy.

Fred Moletrousers wrote:

scrat wrote:
I have edited this out M'lud "accusing myself and another poster of being paedophiles"


As it appears the forum host has deleted the offending article!

Not before I had taken copies of everything that was relevant, he didn't.

I take it that you do realise that accusing someone of paedophilia can constitute a criminal as well as a civil offence? Or that internet anonymity is no longer as "anonymous" as it once was.

Well done.

I will support you fully should you wish to pursue this matter in a court of law.

scrat wrote:

Fred Moletrousers wrote:

Not before I had taken copies of everything that was relevant, he didn't.

I take it that you do realise that accusing someone of paedophilia can constitute a criminal as well as a civil offence? Or that internet anonymity is no longer as "anonymous" as it once was.

Well done.

I will support you fully should you wish to pursue this matter in a court of law.

That would be somewhat difficult for you from the defendant's bench.

Fred Moletrousers wrote:

scrat wrote:
I will support you fully should you wish to pursue this matter in a court of law.

That would be somewhat difficult for you from the defendant's bench.

can I throw Eggs at him outside the court ?




     

Fred Moletrousers wrote:

scrat wrote:
I will support you fully should you wish to pursue this matter in a court of law.

That would be somewhat difficult for you from the defendant's bench.

https://newsfix.niceboard.com/t2594-are-young-black-men-born-to-be-violent-criminals#40698

just as Everyone knows that there is a suspicion of kiddie fiddling in you past and you support some of the radical ideas proposed by perverts.

_________________
GAY DOES NOT EQUAL HAPPY

I think you might have got the wrong end of the stick again, M'lud!

Please stop calling one another pedophiles, please.