New no-no words: LISTEN UP YOU FROGTURDS

First topic message reminder :

I've stated before that I find the word "c-u-n-t" to be offensive, as in the U.S. it's about the worst thing you can call a woman. Others have argued that it's shifted into more polite vernacular in their countries, so I've held off doing anything.

But, as we have a number of female members and they agree on its offensive nature, it's not to be used any more. I would also ask that members refrain from using other certain words that might be used as general insults but that originated as slurs against women, particularly in an ugly sense against female users. Thus, saying that someone is "bitching" about a problem is fine, but calling another member a "bitch" should be avoided.

I have also been asked to ban the word "Nazi."

Huh-boy.

This one I'm torn about, as it has always seemed to me to be a slur against a political ideology (like I've said before) rather than against a person's race, sex, religion or orientation.

HOWEVER. In the spirit of wanting everyone to feel welcome here and not abused, I am also asking that the word "Nazi" only be used in reference to actual Nazis or neo-Nazis. In the same vein, however, I would ask that right-wing users refrain from identifying left-wing users as sympathizing with the genocidal and/or oppressive regimes of Stalin or the Kim dynasty of North Korea. If it is insulting to be identified with Hitler, it is certainly insulting to be identified with Stalin.

Please bear in mind that links that lead to other sites that publish slurs are still allowed, provided their sole purpose is not to abuse.

Also, please bear in mind that the administrative team walks a tightrope. On the one hand, we don't want members to be abused; on the other, we don't want to stifle expression, and sometimes determining the difference between abuse and expression is simply a judgement call and cannot be made simply by referring back to a set of rules.

While nobody's perfect, it will also help if everyone tries to communicate in the spirit of criticizing ideas on their merits, and people on what they say and do, rather than seeking to fight, flame and insult in the first place.

Ultimately, those who rely upon insults seem to be unable to refute the position of the person they disagree with:


Discuss.

Catman wrote:The smiley that i used is from this site, so must be allowed to be used!   

You making the rules now? Only smileys from ths site are allowed to be used? I simply did a tit-for-tat reply to you - you thought you could bypass the ban by using a smiley of it, so I did the same. Sauce for the goose and all that.

Tess. wrote:

Catman wrote:The smiley that i used is from this site, so must be allowed to be used!   

You making the rules now?  Only smileys from ths site are allowed to be used?  I simply did a tit-for-tat reply to you - you thought you could bypass the ban by using a smiley of it, so I did the same.  Sauce for the goose and all that.

Get it through your thick far right skull that homophobic slurs are not allowed.

Joy Division wrote:While I definitely agree about the c**t word! I think we can sometimes take things a step too far in banning many words which should actually be tolerated as we are all adults! some can start pretending to be offended at some other words...


We need to be careful we don't ban some words just because someone does not like them.
But I understand the c**t word is highly offensive to women and a good call to ban that.

he says with the word emblazoned on his avatar. Strange not aword about that but an innocous word like mi-ce gets banned. A less charitable person might presume turning a blind eye to some and focussing on others. Just as well im charitable

Are we allowed to talk about bone idle fraudsters ripping of the taxpayers like Philis?

Catman wrote:

Tess. wrote:
You making the rules now?  Only smileys from ths site are allowed to be used?  I simply did a tit-for-tat reply to you - you thought you could bypass the ban by using a smiley of it, so I did the same.  Sauce for the goose and all that.

Get it through your thick far right skull that homophobic slurs are not allowed.

I think everyone but you knows I'm not homophobic. If I wanted to put up a homophobic slur it'd be a damn sight more offensive than that little emoticon, you twat. (Is twat allowed?)

::dedhrs:: 

Clarkson wrote:

Joy Division wrote:While I definitely agree about the c**t word! I think we can sometimes take things a step too far in banning many words which should actually be tolerated as we are all adults! some can start pretending to be offended at some other words...


We need to be careful we don't ban some words just because someone does not like them.
But I understand the c**t word is highly offensive to women and a good call to ban that.

he says with the word emblazoned on his avatar. Strange not aword about that but an innocous word like mi-ce gets banned. A less charitable person might presume turning a blind eye to some and focussing on others. Just as well im charitable

They do like to do that - tell you off, tell you what to do but not do it themselves.

Ben_Reilly wrote:I've stated before that I find the word "c-u-n-t" to be offensive, as in the U.S. it's about the worst thing you can call a woman. Others have argued that it's shifted into more polite vernacular in their countries, so I've held off doing anything.

But, as we have a number of female members and they agree on its offensive nature, it's not to be used any more. I would also ask that members refrain from using other certain words that might be used as general insults but that originated as slurs against women, particularly in an ugly sense against female users. Thus, saying that someone is "bitching" about a problem is fine, but calling another member a "bitch" should be avoided.

I have also been asked to ban the word "Nazi."

Huh-boy.

This one I'm torn about, as it has always seemed to me to be a slur against a political ideology (like I've said before) rather than against a person's race, sex, religion or orientation.

HOWEVER. In the spirit of wanting everyone to feel welcome here and not abused, I am also asking that the word "Nazi" only be used in reference to actual Nazis or neo-Nazis. In the same vein, however, I would ask that right-wing users refrain from identifying left-wing users as sympathizing with the genocidal and/or oppressive regimes of Stalin or the Kim dynasty of North Korea. If it is insulting to be identified with Hitler, it is certainly insulting to be identified with Stalin.

Please bear in mind that links that lead to other sites that publish slurs are still allowed, provided their sole purpose is not to abuse.

Also, please bear in mind that the administrative team walks a tightrope. On the one hand, we don't want members to be abused; on the other, we don't want to stifle expression, and sometimes determining the difference between abuse and expression is simply a judgement call and cannot be made simply by referring back to a set of rules.

While nobody's perfect, it will also help if everyone tries to communicate in the spirit of criticizing ideas on their merits, and people on what they say and do, rather than seeking to fight, flame and insult in the first place.

Ultimately, those who rely upon insults seem to be unable to refute the position of the person they disagree with:

"Personal insults are the last refuge of the intellectual coward."
- Rabbi Shmuley Boteach

Discuss.

You could just have said "I'm clamping down on free speech and those who persist will be banned"

There is plenty of "free speech" over on Flop by Durham/Hugh Jardon.
He got the Viz book Profanosaurus for Christmas.
It is remarkably funny that he purports to be a wealthy company president employing scores of poorly paid workers whilst he reaps huge rewards from his highly successful company.
The reality is that he cannot string more than 2 words together without recourse to insult.

Handy Andy wrote:There is plenty of "free speech" over on Flop by Durham/Hugh Jardon.
He got the Viz book Profanosaurus for Christmas.
It is remarkably funny that he purports to be a wealthy company president employing scores of poorly paid workers whilst he reaps huge rewards from his highly successful company.
The reality is that he cannot string more than 2 words together without recourse to insult.

.....Then they crow when the LW do it!

RW double standards!   

smelly_bandit wrote:

Ben_Reilly wrote:I've stated before that I find the word "c-u-n-t" to be offensive, as in the U.S. it's about the worst thing you can call a woman. Others have argued that it's shifted into more polite vernacular in their countries, so I've held off doing anything.

But, as we have a number of female members and they agree on its offensive nature, it's not to be used any more. I would also ask that members refrain from using other certain words that might be used as general insults but that originated as slurs against women, particularly in an ugly sense against female users. Thus, saying that someone is "bitching" about a problem is fine, but calling another member a "bitch" should be avoided.

I have also been asked to ban the word "Nazi."

Huh-boy.

This one I'm torn about, as it has always seemed to me to be a slur against a political ideology (like I've said before) rather than against a person's race, sex, religion or orientation.

HOWEVER. In the spirit of wanting everyone to feel welcome here and not abused, I am also asking that the word "Nazi" only be used in reference to actual Nazis or neo-Nazis. In the same vein, however, I would ask that right-wing users refrain from identifying left-wing users as sympathizing with the genocidal and/or oppressive regimes of Stalin or the Kim dynasty of North Korea. If it is insulting to be identified with Hitler, it is certainly insulting to be identified with Stalin.

Please bear in mind that links that lead to other sites that publish slurs are still allowed, provided their sole purpose is not to abuse.

Also, please bear in mind that the administrative team walks a tightrope. On the one hand, we don't want members to be abused; on the other, we don't want to stifle expression, and sometimes determining the difference between abuse and expression is simply a judgement call and cannot be made simply by referring back to a set of rules.

While nobody's perfect, it will also help if everyone tries to communicate in the spirit of criticizing ideas on their merits, and people on what they say and do, rather than seeking to fight, flame and insult in the first place.

Ultimately, those who rely upon insults seem to be unable to refute the position of the person they disagree with:

"Personal insults are the last refuge of the intellectual coward."
- Rabbi Shmuley Boteach

Discuss.

You could just have said "I'm clamping down on free speech and those who persist will be banned"

Or you could just tax your brain long enough to read it for comprehension and see that you're totally wrong?

 

AS on ADO before here...

IT appears as if Smelly_bum leaves any remnants of brains that still remain under a rock back in the FlopCave, with the other Flapettes..

AS I have yet to see Smelly demonstrating any modicum of residual intelligence in anything he posts.

Potty mouth is not free speech. Some people have no morals, decency or regard for anyone or anything. Cretins exist by the millions, but try not to be one.

Handy Andy wrote:There is plenty of "free speech" over on Flop by Durham/Hugh Jardon.
He got the Viz book Profanosaurus for Christmas.
It is remarkably funny that he purports to be a wealthy company president employing scores of poorly paid workers whilst he reaps huge rewards from his highly successful company.
The reality is that he cannot string more than 2 words together without recourse to insult.

Yes I've noticed on Flaps a high level of profanity. Thank God it doesn't happen here. You will note its all right wingers of course never a word from the left.

Ben_Reilly wrote:

smelly_bandit wrote:

You could just have said "I'm clamping down on free speech and those who persist will be banned"

Or you could just tax your brain long enough to read it for comprehension and see that you're totally wrong?

am i totally wrong??

why have you said this??

"I would ask that right-wing users refrain from identifying left-wing users as sympathizing with the genocidal and/or oppressive regimes of Stalin or the Kim dynasty of North Korea. If it is insulting to be identified with Hitler, it is certainly insulting to be identified with Stalin"

are you so blinded by your own prejudice that you fail to see that the above happens both ways and yet you only chastise the right (almost like you're trying to protect the left)

what about sassy and her lies about my "support for breivik"

you don't seem particularly bothered by that, but then again she is left and im right so its no surprise that you have a higher level of tolerance for character assassination when its against the right

Beekeeper wrote: 

AS on ADO before here...

IT appears as if Smelly_bum leaves any remnants of brains that still remain under a rock back in the FlopCave, with the other Flapettes..

AS I have yet to see Smelly demonstrating any modicum of residual intelligence in anything he posts.

  fest

smelly_bandit wrote:

Ben_Reilly wrote:

Or you could just tax your brain long enough to read it for comprehension and see that you're totally wrong?

am i totally wrong??

why have you said this??

"I would ask that right-wing users refrain from identifying left-wing users as sympathizing with the genocidal and/or oppressive regimes of Stalin or the Kim dynasty of North Korea. If it is insulting to be identified with Hitler, it is certainly insulting to be identified with Stalin"

are you so blinded by your own prejudice that you fail to see that the above happens both ways and yet you only chastise the right (almost like you're trying to protect the left)

what about sassy and her lies about my "support for breivik"

you don't seem particularly bothered by that, but then again she is left and im right so its no surprise that you have a higher level of tolerance for character assassination when its against the right

Good afternoon Smelly Bandit.

You ain't gonna get anywhere with our Ben because he hasn't got a mind of his own.....That's because Sassy has got it.

Is Sassy a vamp, a Mata Hari I want to meet her. How intriguing.

@smelly
Well IF I'm not allowed to call you a NAZI it is only far. did you miss that part?

@shady
you suck, Sassy has very little to do with the administration of this site.

Why are you so obsessed with her?     does someone have a crush?     

veya_victaous wrote:@smelly
Well IF I'm not allowed to call you a NAZI it is only far.  did you miss that part?

@shady
you suck, Sassy has very little to do with the administration of this site.

Why are you so obsessed with her?     does someone have a crush?     

Jeez Veya, could you please change that to 'nothing to do with the administration of this site' or the paranoid will be off on another hissy fit.

labour revival wrote:Is Sassy a vamp, a Mata Hari I want to meet her. How intriguing.

Sassy is more like this imo!



  

veya_victaous wrote:@smelly
Well IF I'm not allowed to call you a NAZI it is only far.  did you miss that part?

@shady
you suck, Sassy has very little to do with the administration of this site.

Why are you so obsessed with her?     does someone have a crush?     

There is only one kind of crush I have in mind where sassy is concerned

Sassy wrote:

veya_victaous wrote:@smelly
Well IF I'm not allowed to call you a NAZI it is only far.  did you miss that part?

@shady
you suck, Sassy has very little to do with the administration of this site.

Why are you so obsessed with her?     does someone have a crush?     

Jeez Veya, could you please change that to 'nothing to do with the administration of this site' or the paranoid will be off on another hissy fit.

Come off it sassy

You're obviously the puppeteer, not a very good one though or you would have given Ben a personality

smelly_bandit wrote:

veya_victaous wrote:@smelly
Well IF I'm not allowed to call you a NAZI it is only far.  did you miss that part?

@shady
you suck, Sassy has very little to do with the administration of this site.

Why are you so obsessed with her?     does someone have a crush?     

There is only one kind of crush I have in mind where sassy is concerned

Can you expand on that, then explain your reason why?

Bless you Phil, but I'm not. Never done sickly sweet in my life.

Sassy wrote:Bless you Phil, but I'm not.   Never done sickly sweet in my life.  

Well i find you to be very sweet!   

Catman wrote:

smelly_bandit wrote:

There is only one kind of crush I have in mind where sassy is concerned

Can you expand on that, then explain your reason why?

Oh, he'd like me to be scared of him poor soul. And I don't do scared, especially of keyboard warriors who express the most revolting views and think that gives them a reputation of being hard. In fact, it gives them a reputation of being beneath a cockroach.

Catman wrote:

Sassy wrote:Bless you Phil, but I'm not.   Never done sickly sweet in my life.  

Well i find you to be very sweet!   

Ta, but I just fight for what I believe in, and always have done and don't pull my punches.

Sassy wrote:

Catman wrote:

Can you expand on that, then explain your reason why?

Oh, he'd like me to be scared of him poor soul.   And I don't do scared, especially of keyboard warriors who express the most revolting views and think that gives them a reputation of being hard.   In fact, it gives them a reputation of being beneath a cockroach.

Yea...And what i find so absolutely disgusting, is that the majority of RW, don't even bother to pull him up over his comments.   

.....What does that say about the majority of the RW one here!

    

Catman wrote:

labour revival wrote:Is Sassy a vamp, a Mata Hari I want to meet her. How intriguing.

Sassy is more like this imo!



  

Unfortunate choice - she just died   

Sassy wrote:

Catman wrote:

Can you expand on that, then explain your reason why?

Oh, he'd like me to be scared of him poor soul.   And I don't do scared, especially of keyboard warriors who express the most revolting views and think that gives them a reputation of being hard.   In fact, it gives them a reputation of being beneath a cockroach.

calm down sassy

youre give yourself a nose bleed

any luck on your convenient problem about posting pictures up yet???

im really looking forward to the evidence you have on me

Sassy wrote:

Catman wrote:

Well i find you to be very sweet!   

Ta, but I just fight for what I believe in, and always have done and don't pull my punches.

as do everyone else

smelly_bandit wrote:

Sassy wrote:
Oh, he'd like me to be scared of him poor soul.   And I don't do scared, especially of keyboard warriors who express the most revolting views and think that gives them a reputation of being hard.   In fact, it gives them a reputation of being beneath a cockroach.

calm down sassy
youre give yourself a nose bleed
any luck on your convenient problem about posting pictures up yet???
im really looking forward to the evidence you have on me

 
   HEY, THERE !!!!

Smelly_shit-for-brains,  you silly little turd eater...

I notice that your pathetic spelling and grammar hasn't improved one iota since ADO...
Sphinx may have been silly and naive enough back on ADO as to relabel your puerile and pointless drivel as "educated opinions " ~ but most of us knew better !

TELL everybody what you tell 'em back on IFA ~ how you claim to be a successful though mysterious 40-something multimillionaire "businessman" with a "family, posh houses and expensive cars", in your private little fantasy world..


THE reality is that the "smelly bum bandit" is nothing more than another scrawny little dickless pimply-faced, uneducated and quite thick, high-school dropout, hiding away in his welfare-mum's basement waiting for his testicles to stlll drop ~ while throwing his macho' lies, his empty bravado and laughable threats around the 'net...

HAVE YOU managed to get yourself banned yet today, Smelly_little-toadface ??
IF NOT just keep going ~ you will make sure it's only a matter of time !    

Beekeeper wrote:

smelly_bandit wrote:

calm down sassy
youre give yourself a nose bleed
any luck on your convenient problem about posting pictures up yet???
im really looking forward to the evidence you have on me

  

HEY, THERE !!!!
Smelly_shit-for-brains,  you silly little turd eater...

I notice that your pathetic spelling and grammar hasn't improved one iota since ADO...

Sphinx may be silly and naive enough bacon ADO as to relabel your puerile and pointless drivel as "educated opinions " ~ but most of us know better !

TELL everybody what you tell 'em back on IFA ~ how you claim to be a successful 40-something multimillionaire "businessman" with a "family, posh houses and expensive cars", in your private little fantasy world..


THE reality is that the "smelly bum bandit" is nothing more than another scrawny little dickless pimply-faced, uneducated and quite thick, high-school dropout, hiding away in his welfare-maum's basement airing for his testicles to stlll drop ~ while throwing his macho' lies, his empty bravado and laughable threats around the 'net...

HAVE YOU managed to get yourself banned yet today, Smelly_little-toadface ??
IF NOT just keep going ~ you will make sure it's only a matter of time !       

Your own spelling and grammar are not all that good, old boy.

Beekeeper wrote:

smelly_bandit wrote:

calm down sassy
youre give yourself a nose bleed
any luck on your convenient problem about posting pictures up yet???
im really looking forward to the evidence you have on me

 
   HEY, THERE !!!!

Smelly_shit-for-brains,  you silly little turd eater...

I notice that your pathetic spelling and grammar hasn't improved one iota since ADO...
Sphinx may have been silly and naive enough back on ADO as to relabel your puerile and pointless drivel as "educated opinions " ~ but most of us knew better !

TELL everybody what you tell 'em back on IFA ~ how you claim to be a successful though mysterious 40-something multimillionaire "businessman" with a "family, posh houses and expensive cars", in your private little fantasy world..


THE reality is that the "smelly bum bandit" is nothing more than another scrawny little dickless pimply-faced, uneducated and quite thick, high-school dropout, hiding away in his welfare-maum's basement airing for his testicles to stlll drop ~ while throwing his macho' lies, his empty bravado and laughable threats around the 'net...

HAVE YOU managed to get yourself banned yet today, Smelly_little-toadface ??
IF NOT just keep going ~ you will make sure it's only a matter of time !    

OMG! So smelly has been telling them on Flop that he is a millionaire?  

Just what is the need to feel they have to impress ?, they are fcuking faceless so why?????????????

Give us a wee leak at that if you can Bee! Should be fun!

Although ADO was fun at times( I helped in that department   ) we shall never forget it's severe bias.

Fred Moletrousers wrote:

Beekeeper wrote:
  

HEY, THERE !!!!
Smelly_shit-for-brains,  you silly little turd eater...

I notice that your pathetic spelling and grammar hasn't improved one iota since ADO...

Sphinx may be silly and naive enough bacon ADO as to relabel your puerile and pointless drivel as "educated opinions " ~ but most of us know better !

........................... 

Your own spelling and grammar are not all that good, old boy.

  

WHAT would you know about it, you senile old retard ?!?

WORDS are obviously cheap in your part of the world !

IT IS a pity that you yourself clearly don't have either the education nor the manners that you try to allude to, Fred !    


SHOW me one example of consistently bad spelling on my part, you obnoxious and brain-dead old fart !

YOU can't, can you ?  You mealy-mouthed moron !

AS for grammar ~ what would you know about acceptable real world grammar, anyway. You with your long paragraphs and empty sentences.    

Beekeeper wrote:

Fred Moletrousers wrote:

Your own spelling and grammar are not all that good, old boy.

  

WHAT would you know about it, you senile old retard ?!?

WORDS are obviously cheap in your part of the world !

IT IS a pity that you yourself clearly don't have either the education nor the manners that you try to allude to, Fred !    


SHOW me one example of consistently bad spelling on my part, you obnoxious and brain-dead old fart !

YOU can't, can you ?  You mealy-mouthed moron !

AS for grammar ~ what would you know about acceptable real world grammar, anyway. You with your long paragraphs and empty sentences.    

I think that you have just proved my point most eloquently. Are you still in the third form, perchance?

By the way, it's either/or and not either/nor. Just thought I'd mention it....

Beekeeper wrote:

Fred Moletrousers wrote:

Your own spelling and grammar are not all that good, old boy.

  

WHAT would you know about it, you senile old retard ?!?

WORDS are obviously cheap in your part of the world !

IT IS a pity that you yourself clearly don't have either the education nor the manners that you try to allude to, Fred !    


SHOW me one example of consistently bad spelling on my part, you obnoxious and brain-dead old fart !

YOU can't, can you ?  You mealy-mouthed moron !

AS for grammar ~ what would you know about acceptable real world grammar, anyway. You with your long paragraphs and empty sentences.    

Bang on the money there!   

Catman wrote:

Beekeeper wrote:
  

WHAT would you know about it, you senile old retard ?!?

WORDS are obviously cheap in your part of the world !

IT IS a pity that you yourself clearly don't have either the education nor the manners that you try to allude to, Fred !    


SHOW me one example of consistently bad spelling on my part, you obnoxious and brain-dead old fart !

YOU can't, can you ?  You mealy-mouthed moron !

AS for grammar ~ what would you know about acceptable real world grammar, anyway. You with your long paragraphs and empty sentences.    

Bang on the money there!   

That's absolutely hilarious, coming from someone who appears not to have progressed beyond Janet and John Book 2.

Beekeeper wrote:

smelly_bandit wrote:

calm down sassy
youre give yourself a nose bleed
any luck on your convenient problem about posting pictures up yet???
im really looking forward to the evidence you have on me

 
   HEY, THERE !!!!

Smelly_shit-for-brains,  you silly little turd eater...

I notice that your pathetic spelling and grammar hasn't improved one iota since ADO...
Sphinx may have been silly and naive enough back on ADO as to relabel your puerile and pointless drivel as "educated opinions " ~ but most of us knew better !

TELL everybody what you tell 'em back on IFA ~ how you claim to be a successful though mysterious 40-something multimillionaire "businessman" with a "family, posh houses and expensive cars", in your private little fantasy world..


THE reality is that the "smelly bum bandit" is nothing more than another scrawny little dickless pimply-faced, uneducated and quite thick, high-school dropout, hiding away in his welfare-mum's basement waiting for his testicles to stlll drop ~ while throwing his macho' lies, his empty bravado and laughable threats around the 'net...

HAVE YOU managed to get yourself banned yet today, Smelly_little-toadface ??
IF NOT just keep going ~ you will make sure it's only a matter of time !    

 ::smthg:: 

you are like my own private court jester

now for my next command

i order you to give me more abuse

smelly_bandit wrote:

Beekeeper wrote:
 
   HEY, THERE !!!!

Smelly_shit-for-brains,  you silly little turd eater...

I notice that your pathetic spelling and grammar hasn't improved one iota since ADO...
Sphinx may have been silly and naive enough back on ADO as to relabel your puerile and pointless drivel as "educated opinions " ~ but most of us knew better !

TELL everybody what you tell 'em back on IFA ~ how you claim to be a successful though mysterious 40-something multimillionaire "businessman" with a "family, posh houses and expensive cars", in your private little fantasy world..


THE reality is that the "smelly bum bandit" is nothing more than another scrawny little dickless pimply-faced, uneducated and quite thick, high-school dropout, hiding away in his welfare-mum's basement waiting for his testicles to stlll drop ~ while throwing his macho' lies, his empty bravado and laughable threats around the 'net...

HAVE YOU managed to get yourself banned yet today, Smelly_little-toadface ??
IF NOT just keep going ~ you will make sure it's only a matter of time !    

 ::smthg:: 

you are like my own private court jester

now for my next command

i order you to give me more abuse

Being abused by Beecreeper is a bit like being savaged by a dead sheep, isn't it SB?
It can be mildly amusing, though, and reading his rants does help to pass a little time on a cold, wet February day.

Understanding them, however, takes considerably longer.

Fred Moletrousers wrote:

Beekeeper wrote:
  

WHAT would you know about it, you senile old retard ?!?

WORDS are obviously cheap in your part of the world !

IT IS a pity that you yourself clearly don't have either the education nor the manners that you try to allude to, Fred !    


SHOW me one example of consistently bad spelling on my part, you obnoxious and brain-dead old fart !

YOU can't, can you ?  You mealy-mouthed moron !

AS for grammar ~ what would you know about acceptable real world grammar, anyway. You with your long paragraphs and empty sentences.    

I think that you have just proved my point most eloquently. Are you still in the third form, perchance?

By the way, it's either/or and not either/nor. Just thought I'd mention it....

Glad someone did.

Fred Moletrousers wrote:

Catman wrote:

Bang on the money there!   

That's absolutely hilarious, coming from someone who appears not to have progressed beyond Janet and John Book 2.

You are just a boring, pompous old prick, it would be more interesting to watch paint dry rather than to read the drivel that you post.

Fred Moletrousers wrote:

smelly_bandit wrote:

 ::smthg:: 

you are like my own private court jester

now for my next command

i order you to give me more abuse

Being abused by Beecreeper is a bit like being savaged by a dead sheep, isn't it SB?
It can be mildly amusing, though, and reading his rants does help to pass a little time on a cold, wet February day.

Understanding them, however, takes considerably longer.

  

THE two biggest moronic know-nothing retards of this forum, in bed together in the same thread... (And I noticed your idiot "Good time Gal" Eddie ($2 a pop !) cheering you on from the sidelines..)

How simply apt and fortuitous that is, all gathering together in the same place...
JUST maybe you two big girly-men can do the rest of us all a favour, and get yourself banned together ?

Tell us again about your imaginary "business, mansion, flash cars, and fantasy family" Smelly..
AND how you achieved ALL of that before your 15th birthday !!!  

AND Fred is still just as retarded and senile as he was an hour or two ago !!

Beekeeper wrote:

Fred Moletrousers wrote:

Being abused by Beecreeper is a bit like being savaged by a dead sheep, isn't it SB?
It can be mildly amusing, though, and reading his rants does help to pass a little time on a cold, wet February day.

Understanding them, however, takes considerably longer.

  

THE two biggest moronic know-nothing retards of this forum, in bed together in the same thread... (And I noticed your idiot "Good time Gal" Eddie ($2 a pop !) cheering you on from the sidelines..)

How simply apt and fortuitous that is, all gathering together in the same place...
JUST maybe you big girly-men can do the rest of us all a favour, and get yourself banned together ?

Tell us again about your imaginary "business, mansion, flash cars, and fantasy family" Smelly..
AND how you achieved ALL of that before your 15th birthday !!!      

How sweet!

All the RW scumbags sticking together!

eddie wrote:

Fred Moletrousers wrote:

I think that you have just proved my point most eloquently. Are you still in the third form, perchance?

By the way, it's either/or and not either/nor. Just thought I'd mention it....

Glad someone did.

  

G'Day, Mr. Ed !

IS IT TRUE that your 1970s/'80s music career ended because you always had your head too far up your backside...
ESPECIALLY at those times that you should have been practising and rehearsing, instead !!!   

Beekeeper wrote:

Fred Moletrousers wrote:

Being abused by Beecreeper is a bit like being savaged by a dead sheep, isn't it SB?
It can be mildly amusing, though, and reading his rants does help to pass a little time on a cold, wet February day.

Understanding them, however, takes considerably longer.

  

THE two biggest moronic know-nothing retards of this forum, in bed together in the same thread... (And I noticed your idiot "Good time Gal" Eddie ($2 a pop !) cheering you on from the sidelines..)

How simply apt and fortuitous that is, all gathering together in the same place...
JUST maybe you two big girly-men can do the rest of us all a favour, and get yourself banned together ?

Tell us again about your imaginary "business, mansion, flash cars, and fantasy family" Smelly..
AND how you achieved ALL of that before your 15th birthday !!!  

AND Fred is still just as retarded and senile as he was an hour or two ago !!  

2 dollars a pop?
My hubby thinks that's too expensive.   

Catman wrote:

Fred Moletrousers wrote:

That's absolutely hilarious, coming from someone who appears not to have progressed beyond Janet and John Book 2.

You are just a boring, pompous old prick, it would be more interesting to watch paint dry rather than to read the drivel that you post.

Why are you reading it then? Is it because watching paint dry marks the limit of your intellectual capability?

Oh, I'd forgotten...you're a Daily Mirror "reader." Explains a lot, that does....

Beekeeper wrote:

eddie wrote:

Glad someone did.

  

G'Day,  Mr. Ed !

IS IT TRUE that your 1970s/'80s music career ended because you always had your head too far up your backside...
ESPECIALLY at those times that you should have been practising and rehearsing, instead !!!    

I think you need to sit down. I am a woman firstly, and yes, it's all true.

Can I ask you a question? Do you think people won't read your posts unless you boldy type them or pretty them up with italics?
You must spend a lot of time doing all that. Bless you