Defenceless Muslim women are the prime target of Britain's cowardly racists

First topic message reminder :

Muslim women in Milton Keynes are living in fear every time they step out of their homes following a nauseating racially aggravated assault in which a pregnant woman was kicked in the stomach and lost her unborn baby.

http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/defenceless-Muslim-women-are-prime-target-britains-cowardly-racists-1581508

Was this the defenceless female that was attacked from behind?

Raggamuffin wrote:

Jules wrote:Oh you've brought that old chestnut up yet again. Good. Gives me a chance to straighten the record once and for all.


Listen up. There are only two things on forums I don't intrefere in.

One is mods' decisions to ban.
The second is commenting on the business of complete strangers, who I don't personally know. NEVER ever in a billion years do I interfere or get involved,  if I don't know the person.

You like to post to say that you don't interfere in bannings though, don't you? I mean, you just have to post in a thread about a banning to say that you're not going to interfere.

Why not just keep your mouth shut?

I will, ....on the day someone puts a well earned muzzle on yours.
Goodnight.

Jules wrote:I freely comment on everything else, as is my right as a member. I would not be on forums if I did not have an opinion on anything, or if I wasn't willing to give  opinions on anything.

So stop claiming that you don't interfere. You do it all the time whilst pretending that you're squeaky clean.

Jules wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

You like to post to say that you don't interfere in bannings though, don't you? I mean, you just have to post in a thread about a banning to say that you're not going to interfere.

Why not just keep your mouth shut?

I will, ....on the day someone puts a well earned muzzle on yours.
Goodnight.

Goodnight, and good riddance - for now.

Can I interfere here?

It's a public debate forum, there's no such thing as interfering, everything you write is up for debate aka "interference".

eddie wrote:Can I interfere here?

It's a public debate forum, there's no such thing as interfering, everything you write is up for debate aka "interference".

The issue is about someone claiming they don't interfere when they do - that's all.

Okay well I don't think interfering is the right phrase but whatever.

Raggamuffin wrote:

Jules wrote:I freely comment on everything else, as is my right as a member. I would not be on forums if I did not have an opinion on anything, or if I wasn't willing to give  opinions on anything.

So stop claiming that you don't interfere. You do it all the time whilst pretending that you're squeaky clean.

I have to agree with Miss Ragga on this one who describes Jules to a T..

I told you so eddie about sneaky crafty lying stirring Jules AKA Canary, remember.

She has stalked me over several forums and posted them on Munki. or her own forum, forget which.

Major wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

Jules wrote:I freely comment on everything else, as is my right as a member. I would not be on forums if I did not have an opinion on anything, or if I wasn't willing to give  opinions on anything.

So stop claiming that you don't interfere. You do it all the time whilst pretending that you're squeaky clean.

I have to agree with Miss Ragga on this one who describes Jules to a T..

I told you so eddie about sneaky crafty lying stirring Jules AKA Canary, remember.

She has stalked me over several forums and posted them on Munki. or her own forum, forget which.

Major let me tell you something about the people on here who are moderators, we don't listen to posters who tittle-tattle for two reasons: we aren't interested in what others say about others as we prefer to find out for ourselves and secondly, and more importantly, we can see almost immediately when games are being played because it's fricking obvious to everyone from the get go.

And that includes any little "slip" that you try to pass under the radar, too.

Stormee, Raggamuffin, syl and co. are the last people that should be complaining about interjections, "trolling", false claims of stalking, or any of the other puerile nonsense they go on with...

Their clique is, far and away, the worst offenders in trolling, spamming, attempted disruptions and deflections, and petty cyber-bullying, seen on this here forum..

Raggamuffin wrote:

nicko wrote: "Cretinous mob of nasties"  of course wolf you never insult anyone do you?

He thinks it's fine to say that. He flies under the radar most of the time on here, probably because not many people read his nasty rants.

He flies under the radar because nobody takes his demented ravings seriously.

scrat wrote:

Syl wrote:

I'm not sure how long your lies are going to be tolerated on this forum.
You don't twist things...you blatantly lie, repeat the lies, get your friends to join in....then your lies become gospel to you and your ilk.

You are a forum joke, but you are getting to be a very sour one now.

I'm being attacked by far right filth and I have been attacked by far right filth for all my forum existence.

Exposing far right extremists like yourself doesn't come without its whining multitude of malcontents, fret not,,,I'm used to it!

You missed the Oscar's, luvvie.   Try again next year.  

HoratioTarr wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

He thinks it's fine to say that. He flies under the radar most of the time on here, probably because not many people read his nasty rants.

He flies under the radar because nobody takes his demented ravings seriously.

You should not be so harsh on Penfold, his "demented ravings" are a form of release, if only his keyboard could gain from this.

I think discussing the rise of attacks on defenceless female Muslims is far more important, than lashing out at Penfold over his peculiarities.

eddie wrote:

Major wrote:

I have to agree with Miss Ragga on this one who describes Jules to a T..

I told you so eddie about sneaky crafty lying stirring Jules AKA Canary, remember.

She has stalked me over several forums and posted them on Munki. or her own forum, forget which.

Major let me tell you something about the people on here who are moderators, we don't listen to posters who tittle-tattle for two reasons: we aren't interested in what others say about others as we prefer to find out for ourselves and secondly, and more importantly, we can see almost immediately when games are being played because it's fricking obvious to everyone from the get go.

And that includes any little "slip" that you try to pass under the radar, too.

You do listen SOMETIMES eddie, it is called SELECTIVE HEARING, 'you' let Sassy/Scrat and their gang run things and mega favour them, 'you' had EVERY chance to do your job, take control of the situation which involved my 6 weeks ban which I appreciate was sensibly reexamined eventually.

WHY DID YOU LOOK THE OTHER WAY AND NOT DEAL WITH IT YOURSELF?????????? this is a fair question, eddie.

Have you thought that some of us would like to debate without all of the venom, filthy mouthed gabble, personal attacks and IMMEDIATE derailment from the usual suspect EVERY TIME I make thread/post which is usually substantiated from a C/P.

FAIRNESS FOR ALL.

Major wrote:

I have to agree with Miss Ragga on this one who describes Jules to a T..
She has stalked me over several forums and posted them on Munki....

WhoseYourWolfie wrote:
...............  false claims of stalking, or any of the other puerile nonsense they go on with...
.....

Thank you for saying that, Wolfie. You seem to instinctively know he's talking tosh. I have never stalked anyone in my life and I have never been accused of such by anyone on forums, ever.

Notice that I did not even bother to challenge the ridiculous accusation - and I did not challenge it the first time he said it either, few weeks ago.  After all it's only him .... anyone who takes his utterings and accusations seriously, need their head read. That's why I don't usually bother to challenge the crap he spouts. Look at all the fantasy ''news'' he pumps out on a daily basis, ffs!  

He does not even have a clue what ''stalking'' really means he uses the term in a different way to how other people understand it.

I have to say, he suddenly seems very comfortable with multiple rulebreaking these says, to be randomly yelling such libellous stuff, he does not even care if he's on topic either.

I expect one of his protective mummies will be along shortly to express their disapproval, in their usual myriad of ways, as they don't like anyone upsetting the sweet angelic little lamb.

Well to be fair Jules, wolf himself, and many others are breaking rules these days.

Jules wrote:

Major wrote:

I have to agree with Miss Ragga on this one who describes Jules to a T..
She has stalked me over several forums and posted them on Munki....

WhoseYourWolfie wrote:
...............  false claims of stalking, or any of the other puerile nonsense they go on with...
.....

Thank you for saying that, Wolfie. You seem to instinctively know he's talking tosh. I have never stalked anyone in my life and I have never been accused of such by anyone on forums, ever.

Notice that I did not even bother to challenge the ridiculous accusation - and I did not challenge it the first time he said it either, few weeks ago.  After all it's only him .... anyone who takes his utterings and accusations seriously, need their head read. That's why I don't usually bother to challenge the crap he spouts. Look at all the fantasy ''news'' he pumps out on a daily basis, ffs!  

He does not even have a clue what ''stalking'' really means he uses the term in a different way to how other people understand it.

I have to say, he suddenly seems very comfortable with multiple rulebreaking these says, to be randomly yelling such libellous stuff, he does not even care if he's on topic either.

I expect one of his protective mummies will be along shortly to express their disapproval, in their usual myriad of ways, as they don't like anyone upsetting the sweet angelic little lamb.

YOU even wrote down a LIST of forums and my names that you followed me to, you kept coming back to Munki to creep.

Perhaps it is this thread that has startled the Borg herd and sent monkey boys minion into hysteria, he's sent the reserves in to little effect, let's hope he gets smelly and pakistanley here for special Eds to swoon over.

Of course setting the deflection to one side, this is about the increased attacks on defenceless females, why it has sent the Borg herd into panic mode could have something to do with the fact that private piles has alleged to have committed the very same crime and they've been busy buddying up to him.

Boom, hypocrisy exposed!

eddie wrote:
Well to be fair Jules, wolf himself, and many others are breaking rules these days.

Bullshit eddie,  stop your lying..

You have been the biggest "rule breaker" on here today..

You are being a disgrace as a mod,  and as a human being as well.

Really wolf? After months of allowing you and scrat and others, on occasion, to call my honesty into question....you think I'm not going to bite back?

There's no point in engaging with you. You're only here, after all, to do scrat's bidding like the sheep you've become.

Now do one.

Major wrote:
YOU even wrote down a LIST of forums and my names that you followed me to, you kept coming back to Munki to creep.

"followed"?????
Why do you always use such exaggerative, perjorative words to describe perfectly ordinary forum activities?
You use horrible words like lurk, follow, sneak, stalk, creep - if you happen to dislike the person.
Even your own friends have told you that they sometimes report other members, yet you use the word sneak to describe people who report others.

One day I replied in a friendly, pleasant way to something eddie said, and immediately you said I was up her ass. What a ludicrous thing to say. Your vocabulary for ordinary activities is chochablock with unpleasant , OTT words.


You exist in a bubble of hyperbole and exaggeration, and that's not going to change anytime soon. I'm going to just leave it there.  I'm done talking to you.

eddie wrote:Well to be fair Jules, wolf himself, and many others are breaking rules these days.

I see. I am not a rule breaker though. I've always been happy with the rules. Never had a problem with them.

Jules wrote:

Major wrote:
YOU even wrote down a LIST of forums and my names that you followed me to, you kept coming back to Munki to creep.

"followed"?????
Why do you always use such exaggerative, perjorative words to describe perfectly ordinary forum activities?
You use horrible words like lurk, follow, sneak, stalk, creep - if you happen to dislike the person.
Even your own friends have told you that they sometimes report other members, yet you use the word sneak to describe people who report others.

One day I replied in a friendly, pleasant way to something eddie said, and immediately you said I was up her ass. What a ludicrous thing to say. Your vocabulary for ordinary activities is chochablock with unpleasant , OTT words.


You exist in a bubble of hyperbole and exaggeration, and that's not going to change anytime soon. I'm going to just leave it there.  I'm done talking to you.

Damn good point. It's one of the ways these thing escalate. People can't just respond to the substance, they've got to characterize the response. Compare:

'To your your point on Innocent Muslims...'

'To your nasty, bullying spam, when you were stalking me on the not-so-Innocent Muslims thread..."

Attitude & adjectives...that's all it is. Seems to me to be an open admission one has no response.

Jules wrote:

eddie wrote:Well to be fair Jules, wolf himself, and many others are breaking rules these days.

I see. I am not a rule breaker though. I've always been happy with the rules. Never had a problem with them.

Yes you have really done well to stay within the rules, Jules.
Hey, that rhymes.