WAR ON ISIS: 34 Muslim NATIONS JOIN FORCES WITH MILITARY ALLIANCE TO FIGHT DAESH TERRORISM

• Jordan;
  
• United Arab Emirates;
  
• Pakistan;
  
• Bahrain;
  
• Bangladesh;
  
• Benin;
  
• Turkey;
  
• Chad;
  
• Togo;
  
• Tunisia;
  
• Djibouti;
  
• Senegal;
  
• Sudan;
  
• Sierra Leone;
  
• Somalia;
  
• Gabon;
  
• Guinea;
  
• Palestine;
  
• Comoros;
  
• Qatar;
  
• Cote d'Ivoire;
  
• Kuwait;
  
• Lebanon;
  
• Libya;
  
• Maldives;
  
• Mali;
  
• Malaysia;
  
• Egypt;
  
• Morocco;
  
• Mauritania;
  
• Niger;
  
• Nigeria; and
  
• Yemen.
  

Fuzzy Zack wrote:

Richard The Lionheart wrote:


Last I checked Muslim terrorists have been attacking civillians in Israel.
Hence why I knew I could prove how racist sexy was after before when she said Hitler should have finsihed the job.
She views israeli civtizens as legitimate targets
I really do not need any advise either from a sheep when you should be condemning sexy for her views which dehumanizes Israeli citizens.
Which funnilly enough so did Hitler dehumanize Jews

What's SM have to do with my reply? Lol! I was talking about Victor (although I agree with Victor).

I wouldn't really play the judgemental and high and mighty card. That's the problem with militant atheists, people like you think they're God. Lol!

SM has mentioned on this thread she is against the killing of civilians. So don't lie and slander.

Fuzzy Zack wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

It's to protect the "Islamic nation" according to the article.

Are you a bit slow? Sorry to be rude but Israel part of any Islamlic nation?

Richard The Lionheart wrote:

Fuzzy Zack wrote:

I didn't know that.

But Hamas are the government in Gaza, not a terrorist organisation.

To the EU and the US, Canada etc they are a terrorist organisation.
So we are back to who this coalition deem terrorist and who they do not deem terrorist

Fuzzy Zack wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

Even the military wing?

Are they attacking civilians in Palestine?

Fuzzy Zack wrote:

Richard The Lionheart wrote:


To the EU and the US, Canada etc they are a terrorist organisation.
So we are back to who this coalition deem terrorist and who they do not deem terrorist

Are the EU and US part of this alliance?

Seriously! Lol!

Raggamuffin wrote:

Fuzzy Zack wrote:

Are you a bit slow? Sorry to be rude but Israel part of any Islamlic nation?

The Islamic nation means Muslims, it's not necessarily a reference to a particular country. That's why I asked if only Muslims will be protected. What about Christians, for example?

Fuzzy Zack wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

The Islamic nation means Muslims, it's not necessarily a reference to a particular country. That's why I asked if only Muslims will be protected. What about Christians, for example?

That's your definition and interpretation and it appears to be incorrect.

Defending a nation against terorism does not discriminate between people. Just as attacking by terrorism doesn't discriminate between people either.

Fuzzy Zack wrote:

Richard The Lionheart wrote:


To the EU and the US, Canada etc they are a terrorist organisation.
So we are back to who this coalition deem terrorist and who they do not deem terrorist

Are the EU and US part of this alliance?

Seriously! Lol!

Raggamuffin wrote:

Fuzzy Zack wrote:

Are the EU and US part of this alliance?

Seriously! Lol!

Exactly, so it comes down to who this alliance considers to be a terrorist organisation.

Raggamuffin wrote:

Fuzzy Zack wrote:

That's your definition and interpretation and it appears to be incorrect.

Defending a nation against terorism does not discriminate between people. Just as attacking by terrorism doesn't discriminate between people either.

Did he say they would be defending nations though?

Richard The Lionheart wrote:

Fuzzy Zack wrote:

Are the EU and US part of this alliance?

Seriously! Lol!

I never knew such things were funny to you
So where Saudi has not protect civillians and in fact killed thousands in Yemen and now you think that the west has no legitimate view to cast groups as terrorist really just about sums up your views

So thanks Zack

Fuzzy Zack wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

Exactly, so it comes down to who this alliance considers to be a terrorist organisation.

Any organisation that attacks the those countries.

Hamas does not attack its own civilians.

Fuzzy Zack wrote:

Richard The Lionheart wrote:


I never knew such things were funny to you
So where Saudi has not protect civillians and in fact killed thousands in Yemen and now you think that the west has no legitimate view to cast groups as terrorist really just about sums up your views

So thanks Zack

Why are you being so defensive again?

Richard The Lionheart wrote:

Fuzzy Zack wrote:

What's SM have to do with my reply? Lol! I was talking about Victor (although I agree with Victor).

I wouldn't really play the judgemental and high and mighty card. That's the problem with militant atheists, people like you think they're God. Lol!

SM has mentioned on this thread she is against the killing of civilians. So don't lie and slander.

Again what a copout, she dehumanized israeli citizens and again a group cannot be deemed freedom fighters if they deliberately target civillians. That is deemed in war a war crime or in times of peace terrorism.
She was asked to condemn the Palestinian attacks on israelis, she said that was a differnt matter because they were in occupation, which means she views all Israel as occupied.
That is racist in itself because it denies the existance of Israel itself and denies self determination.
Now I have studied racism for years and part of my degree was on nazism, so I know better than most waht is racist and what is not racist.

So again its no surpirse you refuse to condemn and this is the issue within some of the Muslim community, they allow a hate and why antisemitism is rife throughout the Muslim world.
At least even Medhi recognises the problem. so why are you ignoring it?

http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/mehdi-hasan/anti-semitism-british-Muslim-community_b_2922013.html
4

Fuzzy Zack wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

Exactly, so it comes down to who this alliance considers to be a terrorist organisation.

Any organisation that attacks the those countries.

Hamas does not attack its own civilians.

Fuzzy Zack wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

Did he say they would be defending nations though?

At the moment your views are mere speculation. Time will tell.

Raggamuffin wrote:

Fuzzy Zack wrote:

Any organisation that attacks the those countries.

Hamas does not attack its own civilians.

Are you sure about that?

Richard The Lionheart wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

Are you sure about that?

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/may/27/hamas-executed-palestinians-under-cover-gaza-conflict-amnesty

Raggamuffin wrote:

Fuzzy Zack wrote:

At the moment your views are mere speculation. Time will tell.

Indeed it will Zack, indeed it will.

Fuzzy Zack wrote:

Richard The Lionheart wrote:


http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/may/27/hamas-executed-palestinians-under-cover-gaza-conflict-amnesty

Are you telling me that the US have never murdered its own citizens?

In fact, the US law states it's legal to conduct a drone attack against one of its civilians, on US soil.

https://occupycorporatism.com/holder-confirms-obama-can-murder-us-citizens-by-drone-attack-in-america/

Both you and Rags don't seem to understand the scope of the agreement.

As I said, time will tell where this alliance will go. Just as the alliance to fight terror in the West.

To be frank Didge, while your judgemental hysteria makes good entertainment, it is also quite pointless.

Richard The Lionheart wrote:

Richard The Lionheart wrote:


Again what a copout, she dehumanized israeli citizens and again a group cannot be deemed freedom fighters if they deliberately target civillians. That is deemed in war a war crime or in times of peace terrorism.
She was asked to condemn the Palestinian attacks on israelis, she said that was a differnt matter because they were in occupation, which means she views all Israel as occupied.
That is racist in itself because it denies the existance of Israel itself and denies self determination.
Now I have studied racism for years and part of my degree was on nazism, so I know better than most waht is racist and what is not racist.

So again its no surpirse you refuse to condemn and this is the issue within some of the Muslim community, they allow a hate and why antisemitism is rife throughout the Muslim world.
At least even Medhi recognises the problem. so why are you ignoring it?

http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/mehdi-hasan/anti-semitism-british-Muslim-community_b_2922013.html
4

No response either

Quelle surprise, I guess a respect Muslim who speaks of this antisemitism must be a quisling to zack

Fuzzy Zack wrote:

Richard The Lionheart wrote:


http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/may/27/hamas-executed-palestinians-under-cover-gaza-conflict-amnesty

Are you telling me that the US have never murdered its own citizens?

In fact, the US law states it's legal to conduct a drone attack against one of its civilians, on US soil.

https://occupycorporatism.com/holder-confirms-obama-can-murder-us-citizens-by-drone-attack-in-america/

Both you and Rags don't seem to understand the scope of the agreement.

As I said, time will tell where this alliance will go. Just as the alliance to fight terror in the West.

To be frank Didge, while your judgemental hysteria makes good entertainment, it is also quite pointless.

Fuzzy Zack wrote:

Richard The Lionheart wrote:



No response either

Quelle surprise, I guess a respect Muslim who speaks of this antisemitism must be a quisling to zack

Lol! The old "I didn't respond within 2 minutes, so I must be a racist" strategy. lol! Nice one, Dick.

SM didn't not say anything racist or bigoted on this thread nor did she condone the killing of civilians/innocents.

And nor is someone like you in a position to judge if a person is bigoted. But then again, maybe you're an expert. Lol!

Richard The Lionheart wrote:

Fuzzy Zack wrote:

Are you telling me that the US have never murdered its own citizens?

In fact, the US law states it's legal to conduct a drone attack against one of its civilians, on US soil.

https://occupycorporatism.com/holder-confirms-obama-can-murder-us-citizens-by-drone-attack-in-america/

Both you and Rags don't seem to understand the scope of the agreement.

As I said, time will tell where this alliance will go. Just as the alliance to fight terror in the West.

To be frank Didge, while your judgemental hysteria makes good entertainment, it is also quite pointless.

First point racist.
Hamas is a polictical group, you cast americans as if the nation is one political group which is absurd

So then your view would be against the governement and as it should be with the Israel goverment is you have beef, which is why you fail to grasp anything.

Also two wrongs do not make a right, why do you think they do?
You fail to understand morality and ethics and even worse moral equivalence

Fuzzy Zack wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

Exactly, so it comes down to who this alliance considers to be a terrorist organisation.

Any organisation that attacks the those countries.

Hamas does not attack its own civilians.

Raggamuffin wrote:So Zack is saying that Hamas is not a terrorist group, so they are free to kill who they like.

Fuzzy Zack wrote:

Richard The Lionheart wrote:


First point racist.
Hamas is a polictical group, you cast americans as if the nation is one political group which is absurd

So then your view would be against the governement and as it should be with the Israel goverment is you have beef, which is why you fail to grasp anything.

Also two wrongs do not make a right, why do you think they do?
You fail to understand morality and ethics and even worse moral equivalence

You really are desperate to label me a racist. Very defensive of you. Lol!

American could be what ever government were in power at the time. d'uh!

Republicans and democrats are political groups too. 2nd d'uh!

Quite agree that 2 wrongs don't make a right. But then you should present both wrongs before making a equivalent judgement. 3rd d'uh.

Raggamuffin wrote:

Fuzzy Zack wrote:

Any organisation that attacks the those countries.

Hamas does not attack its own civilians.

It doesn't say they will only defend those countries, it says that those nations have formed an alliance to combat terrorism.

Richard The Lionheart wrote:

Fuzzy Zack wrote:

You really are desperate to label me a racist. Very defensive of you. Lol!

American could be what ever government were in power at the time. d'uh!

Republicans and democrats are political groups too. 2nd d'uh!

Quite agree that 2 wrongs don't make a right. But then you should present both wrongs before making a equivalent judgement. 3rd d'uh.

You just viewed all americans by stating them as murdering off a view point which is fundementally racist or you are that stupid to fail to understand it is. American you define a whole people, and not a governement.
I mean how many times do I say, Hamas, Pa, fatha for example?
So two wrongs do not make a right and thus Hamas to you then must be a terrorist organisation who as seen murders palestinians who they deem to be in opposition to you.

Now is the US senate like this?

Fuzzy Zack wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:So Zack is saying that Hamas is not a terrorist group, so they are free to kill who they like.

Where did I say that?

Stop lying Rags.

Or at least post your "statement" as a "question", like Fox News. Lol!

But Hamas are the government in Gaza, not a terrorist organisation.

Fuzzy Zack wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

It doesn't say they will only defend those countries, it says that those nations have formed an alliance to combat terrorism.

Like I said, time will tell.

Any speculation is pointless.

Fuzzy Zack wrote:

Richard The Lionheart wrote:


You just viewed all americans by stating them as murdering off a view point which is fundementally racist or you are that stupid to fail to understand it is. American you define a whole people, and not a governement.
I mean how many times do I say, Hamas, Pa, fatha for example?
So two wrongs do not make a right and thus Hamas to you then must be a terrorist organisation who as seen murders palestinians who they deem to be in opposition to you.

Now is the US senate like this?

You're a bit slow. So I had to clarify who I meant by Americans.

Raggamuffin wrote:

Fuzzy Zack wrote:

Where did I say that?

Stop lying Rags.

Or at least post your "statement" as a "question", like Fox News. Lol!

But Hamas are the government in Gaza, not a terrorist organisation.

Fuzzy Zack wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

Are Hamas are a terrorist organisation in Palestine? yes or no?

Answer in 1 word.

Richard The Lionheart wrote:

Fuzzy Zack wrote:

Like I said, time will tell.

Any speculation is pointless.

Not when you said they are there to protect civillians.\
As seen the track record of late by Saudi certainly calls that into question
Nopw what warning systems do saudi give to civillians in Yemen before an airstrike?

Richard The Lionheart wrote:

Fuzzy Zack wrote:




Are Hamas are a terrorist organisation in Palestine? yes or no?

Answer in 1 word.

That has to be the daftest point I have ever heard.

Explain the violence between Fatah and hamas?

Fuzzy Zack wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

Are Hamas are a terrorist organisation in Palestine? yes or no?

Answer in 1 word.

Fuzzy Zack wrote:

Richard The Lionheart wrote:


That has to be the daftest point I have ever heard.

Explain the violence between Fatah and hamas?

You don't have the guts to answer my question. Lol!

Fuzzy Zack wrote:

Richard The Lionheart wrote:


Not when you said they are there to protect civillians.\
As seen the track record of late by Saudi certainly calls that into question
Nopw what warning systems do saudi give to civillians in Yemen before an airstrike?

Again - you could say the same about who the US classes as civilians or the enemy.

Let's not forget they invented the term "combatant" to kill civilians legally.

Raggamuffin wrote:

Fuzzy Zack wrote:




Are Hamas are a terrorist organisation in Palestine? yes or no?

Answer in 1 word.

Perhaps you'd like to apologise for accusing me of lying.

Fuzzy Zack wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

Perhaps you'd like to apologise for accusing me of lying.

Lol! I can practically see the sweat of desperation trickling down your face.

The fact you couldn't answer my question proves you were lying. That's exactly why I asked the question and caught you with your pants down.

When you find the guts to answer, we can continue this conversation. Until then I have no choice but to treat you as a liar with zero credibility to your posts.

Fuzzy Zack wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

Perhaps you'd like to apologise for accusing me of lying.

Lol! I can practically see the sweat of desperation trickling down your face.

The fact you couldn't answer my question proves you were lying. That's exactly why I asked the question and caught you with your pants down.

When you find the guts to answer, we can continue this conversation. Until then I have no choice but to treat you as a liar with zero credibility to your posts.

Richard The Lionheart wrote:

Fuzzy Zack wrote:

You don't have the guts to answer my question. Lol!

Becuase it is utterly idiotic.
Hamas rules by the gun, so how do people opposition say they are terrorists, if they execute them?
Do you understand that?
How also can a society view them as terrorist if they indoctrinate children with hate based on islam?

Fuzzy Zack wrote:

Richard The Lionheart wrote:


Becuase it is utterly idiotic.
Hamas rules by the gun, so how do people opposition say they are terrorists, if they execute them?
Do you understand that?
How also can a society view them as terrorist if they indoctrinate children with hate based on islam?

You only state the question is idiotic (when it's actually simple, anyone can answer) because it will expose how invalid your argument actually is.

Both you and Rags are running scared from a simple question. What does that say to the rest of us?

Sorry bruv, you've been caught with your panties down too. And we can all see your skid marks.

Raggamuffin wrote:

Fuzzy Zack wrote:

Lol! I can practically see the sweat of desperation trickling down your face.

The fact you couldn't answer my question proves you were lying. That's exactly why I asked the question and caught you with your pants down.

When you find the guts to answer, we can continue this conversation. Until then I have no choice but to treat you as a liar with zero credibility to your posts.

I'll answer you. Yes, they are terrorists. Now you can apologise for accusing me of lying - I posted what you said, so I wasn't lying.

Learn some manners too, and don't be so vulgar.

Richard The Lionheart wrote:

Fuzzy Zack wrote:

You only state the question is idiotic (when it's actually simple, anyone can answer) because it will expose how invalid your argument actually is.

Both you and Rags are running scared from a simple question. What does that say to the rest of us?

Sorry bruv, you've been caught with your panties down too. And we can all see your skid marks.

I noticed you delted the important part about how the germans viewed the Nazis and how the nazis committed terrorist acts themseves.

Again have you hear of the night of the long knives?

Now evidence number 2

If there is and has been an ongoing hate program against Jews, where in the palestinian  territories the level of antisemitism is rife and they view the attack and murder of innocent israeli civillians as justified, why would they class Hamas as terroristsm, if they themselves back terrorism?


http://www.timesofisrael.com/poll-23-of-palestinians-back-stabbing-attacks-armed-uprising/