Ireland's Gay Day

by Guest Sat May 23, 2015 11:00 pm

First topic message reminder :

Ireland's Gay Day - Page 3 CFr6ubiW8AA8GVb

Yes vote to equal marriage, Eurovision is on, apparently al rainbow over Cork, has to be officially the gayest day in Irish history. cheers

by eddie Sun May 24, 2015 10:47 am

Raggamuffin wrote:
risingsun wrote:Honestly Rags, sometimes you're ok and then sometimes you are so dense I have the urge to shake you.

I'm not dense - as you well know. You only say that because I don't toe the usual line on here. I'm just bored with all this "gay" stuff. People are people - why does something have to be "gay"? It's a song competition, or possibly a political competition, there's no need for it to be gay as well.

Oh come on rags I liked the first post on this thread - made me smile and feel happy for Ireland and all the repression to be over!
And yes, Eurovision has a huge gay following.

Sassy's post was nice and it made me smile.

So all I'm going to say to it is this: cheers

by Eilzel Sun May 24, 2015 12:24 pm

Exactly Eds. Honestly I feel raggs all this on herself by instantly spitting negativity on what should have been a fun thread.

^Nems, I answered nicko's question, don't really see the need for the smart ass comment though when it comes to grouping up on posters you are more experienced than most ;-)

by Guest Sun May 24, 2015 2:54 pm

I feel glad for the non mafia screamer gays who can at last marry people of their gender.But this referendum & result could have come about years ago if the screamers hadn't put off the vote by attacking everyone who even dared to discuss the matter.......But that's the gay mafia for you......Putting back progress by years.

Food for thought......it's been rumoured for decades in the UK military that the majority of IRA bombers were selected because they were gay/lesbian.Apparently,they had no qualms about planting bombs & blowing people up.They carried out the attacks with a certain cold aptitude.

I don't know how true that is,but the rumour has been going around for a long time.Wonder if that had any effect on the referendum outcome? Surely not?

by Eilzel Sun May 24, 2015 2:59 pm

Wow Shady you've outdone yourself with the amount of BS you can fit into one post, well done Smile

by Guest Sun May 24, 2015 3:00 pm

Shady wrote:I feel glad for the non mafia screamer gays who can at last marry people of their gender.But this referendum & result could have come about years ago if the screamers hadn't put off the vote by attacking everyone who even dared to discuss the matter.......But that's the gay mafia for you......Putting back progress by years.

Food for thought......it's been rumoured for decades in the UK military that the majority of IRA bombers were selected because they were gay/lesbian.Apparently,they had no qualms about planting bombs & blowing people up.They carried out the attacks with a certain cold aptitude.

I don't know how true that is,but the rumour has been going around for a long time.Wonder if that had any effect on the referendum outcome? Surely not?

Incorrect, it certainly would not have come about years ago, because of who may held strict religious views, which have dramatically changed over the last couple of decades, showing ho you are also out of touch understanding the Irish people. As to your next claim, that should be very easy for you to prove based on convicted terrorists caught should it not?

Please let me have your evidence?

by Guest Sun May 24, 2015 3:01 pm

Eilzel wrote:Wow Shady you've outdone yourself with the amount of BS you can fit into one post, well done

He does make me laugh with the amount of drivel he continues to write.

Laughing

by Guest Sun May 24, 2015 3:04 pm

Eilzel wrote:Wow Shady you've outdone yourself with the amount of BS you can fit into one post, well done

The truth always hurts doesn't it? And it's always nice to burst the gay mafia bubble & put a different perspective on issues.....especially gay issues.

Remember Eilzel,your shit stinks as bad as mine.

by Guest Sun May 24, 2015 3:05 pm

Shady wrote:
Eilzel wrote:Wow Shady you've outdone yourself with the amount of BS you can fit into one post, well done

The truth always hurts doesn't it? And it's always nice to burst the gay mafia bubble & put a different perspective on issues.....especially gay issues.

Remember Eilzel,your shit stinks as bad as mine.

Considering you failed to post anything truthful, I did find it amusing for the fact how you just invent things.

by Guest Sun May 24, 2015 3:08 pm

Is it this one or is it that one? Where shall I post next?............

by Guest Sun May 24, 2015 3:08 pm

Shady wrote:Is it this one or is it that one? Where shall I post next?............

Here if you like

by Guest Sun May 24, 2015 3:20 pm

HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR!!

Alright I know I shouldn't do it......mock the afflicted.But I just can't help it sometimes.

Just one more time & then I'll stop........promise.

.....Come on sicko...heeeere we go now......which thread am I going to now?.........this one? That one?

by Guest Sun May 24, 2015 3:22 pm

Shady wrote:HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR!!

Alright I know I shouldn't do it......mock the afflicted.But I just can't help it sometimes.

Just one more time & then I'll stop........promise.

.....Come on sicko...heeeere we go now......which thread am I going to now?.........this one? That one?

Not really concerned which thread you post in shady, I will just continue to post after you as its so much fun

Laughing

by Raggamuffin Sun May 24, 2015 5:24 pm

eddie wrote:
Raggamuffin wrote:

I'm not dense - as you well know. You only say that because I don't toe the usual line on here. I'm just bored with all this "gay" stuff. People are people - why does something have to be "gay"? It's a song competition, or possibly a political competition, there's no need for it to be gay as well.

Oh come on rags I liked the first post on this thread - made me smile and feel happy for Ireland and all the repression to be over!
And yes, Eurovision has a huge gay following.

Sassy's post was nice and it made me smile.

So all I'm going to say to it is this:

FFS, Eurovision has a huge following anyway - gay or not. I merely said it wasn't a gay thing, and I was told I was "dense".

Ireland wasn't even in the Eurovison final this year, so the connection was very tenuous.

by Raggamuffin Sun May 24, 2015 5:26 pm

Eilzel wrote:Exactly Eds. Honestly I feel raggs all this on herself by instantly spitting negativity on what should have been a fun thread.

^Nems, I answered nicko's question, don't really see the need for the smart ass comment though when it comes to grouping up on posters you are more experienced than most ;-)

You don't mind making smartarse comments though, do you?

by Raggamuffin Sun May 24, 2015 5:34 pm

Belatucadros wrote:
Nems wrote:

You haven't missed much Nicko, just Rags being tag teamed and spoken to like she is dirt.

Laughable to say the least and shows how you are always so biased and why Nems, because sassy was posting on this, that shows you need to grow the hell up love.

Her own words:

You're a nasty old bigot Didge - I'm much more tolerant than you. You need to take a good look at yourself and realise you're not quite as marvellous as you think you are.

Good riddance.

You continually expose yourself for the pompous, arrogant, bigoted fool that you are - no help needed from me.

It's very clear that you're a nasty bigot Didge. You have no self-awareness whatsoever.

Look at your own words before you point the finger.

by Guest Sun May 24, 2015 5:35 pm

Raggamuffin wrote:
Belatucadros wrote:

Laughable to say the least and shows how you are always so biased and why Nems, because sassy was posting on this, that shows you need to grow the hell up love.

Her own words:

You're a nasty old bigot Didge - I'm much more tolerant than you. You need to take a good look at yourself and realise you're not quite as marvellous as you think you are.

Good riddance.

You continually expose yourself for the pompous, arrogant, bigoted fool that you are - no help needed from me.

It's very clear that you're a nasty bigot Didge. You have no self-awareness whatsoever.

Look at your own words before you point the finger.

I have thank you and I just found the claim to you being more tolerant and then after I had left for you to say "Good Riddance" had to the biggest hypocrisy from you yet.

by Tommy Monk Sun May 24, 2015 5:36 pm

Bang on again rags!!!

by Raggamuffin Sun May 24, 2015 5:37 pm

Tommy Monk wrote:Bang on again rags!!!

Thank you again Tommy. Ireland's Gay Day - Page 3 2385359624

by Guest Sun May 24, 2015 5:38 pm

My words to Rags were.
She is a bigot, of which she is and being in agreement with Eilzel, after she made a real poor mistake that she was dense, compared to her comments which are ageist as well:

You're a nasty old bigot Didge - I'm much more tolerant than you. You need to take a good look at yourself and realise you're not quite as marvellous as you think you are.

Good riddance.

You continually expose yourself for the pompous, arrogant, bigoted fool that you are - no help needed from me.

It's very clear that you're a nasty bigot Didge. You have no self-awareness whatsoever.

by Raggamuffin Sun May 24, 2015 5:40 pm

Belatucadros wrote:My words to Rags were.
She is a bigot, of which she is and being in agreement with Eilzel, after she made a real poor mistake that she was dense, compared to her comments which are ageist as well:

You're a nasty old bigot Didge - I'm much more tolerant than you. You need to take a good look at yourself and realise you're not quite as marvellous as you think you are.

Good riddance.

You continually expose yourself for the pompous, arrogant, bigoted fool that you are - no help needed from me.

It's very clear that you're a nasty bigot Didge. You have no self-awareness whatsoever.

Awww, is the truth hurting you Didge?

by Guest Sun May 24, 2015 5:42 pm

Raggamuffin wrote:
Belatucadros wrote:My words to Rags were.
She is a bigot, of which she is and being in agreement with Eilzel, after she made a real poor mistake that she was dense, compared to her comments which are ageist as well:

You're a nasty old bigot Didge - I'm much more tolerant than you. You need to take a good look at yourself and realise you're not quite as marvellous as you think you are.

Good riddance.

You continually expose yourself for the pompous, arrogant, bigoted fool that you are - no help needed from me.

It's very clear that you're a nasty bigot Didge. You have no self-awareness whatsoever.

Awww, is the truth hurting you Didge?

Actually the words were rather infantile and hardly of any calibre and intelligence to hurt me, just the usual thing you would find within a school playground.
Never mind hun you will learn one day when you stop being so bitter all the time!
On that I wish you luck

by Raggamuffin Sun May 24, 2015 5:43 pm

Belatucadros wrote:
Raggamuffin wrote:

Awww, is the truth hurting you Didge?

Actually the words were rather infantile and hardly of any calibre and intelligence to hurt me, just the usual thing you would find within a school playground.
Never mind hun you will learn one day when you stop being so bitter all the time!
On that I wish you luck

Poor old Didge. lol!

by Guest Sun May 24, 2015 5:44 pm

Raggamuffin wrote:
Belatucadros wrote:

Actually the words were rather infantile and hardly of any calibre and intelligence to hurt me, just the usual thing you would find within a school playground.
Never mind hun you will learn one day when you stop being so bitter all the time!
On that I wish you luck

Poor old Didge.

Why thank you.

Laughing

by Tommy Monk Sun May 24, 2015 5:50 pm

You are most welcome again rags!

I saw the homoNazi bigots taking turns in targeted attacks last night on here and was a target of their usual SIXHIRB style bullshit and other nastyness for daring to suggest that I was not convinced of the legitimacy of the vote in Ireland...

Bollocks to the fascist and bigoted homoNazis!!!

by Raggamuffin Sun May 24, 2015 5:52 pm

Tommy Monk wrote:You are most welcome again rags!

I saw the homoNazi bigots taking turns in targeted attacks last night on here and was a target of their usual SIXHIRB style bullshit and other nastyness for daring to suggest that I was not convinced of the legitimacy of the vote in Ireland...

Bollocks to the fascist and bigoted homoNazis!!!

Yes, Sassy in particular was very rude and nasty to you for having a different opinion.

Can I ask why you think the vote was not legitimate?

by Guest Sun May 24, 2015 5:54 pm

Tommy Monk wrote:You are most welcome again rags!

I saw the homoNazi bigots taking turns in targeted attacks last night on here and was a target of their usual SIXHIRB style bullshit and other nastyness for daring to suggest that I was not convinced of the legitimacy of the vote in Ireland...

Bollocks to the fascist and bigoted homoNazis!!!

by Tommy Monk Sun May 24, 2015 6:03 pm

Already posted reasons but basically, after the EU referendum stitch up it is entirely possible to have happened here too.

The rolling out of homosexual marriage is part of the 'agenda'.

Apart from NI, Ireland was the only country in western Europe not to allow it and under the EU this cannot be allowed to continue.

They know full well that if politicians in Ireland had tried to impose this then their would have been outrage about it... so what better than to hold a fixed referendum and make the people believe it was something that they voted for!?

Also the extremely high result itself for yes is clearly designed to now be able to claim that it was so conclusive and not needing another referendum on it... but also suspiciously too high a result to be believable...

I don't think that that many Irish would have voted yes at all!!!

I was expecting a no vote at least about 65/35%.

I mean just the way they were all claiming victory and celebrating before the votes were even being counted was reason enough to suspect the 'result' was already known... and there's only one way that could have been 'known' with such certainty...

by Guest Sun May 24, 2015 6:06 pm

So yet again Tommy provides no evidence a complete lack of understanding of the Irish people and keeps claiming an unfounded belief to this being a fix. The very fact you are often very wrong on view points and easily refuted countless times might provide you with a clue, that your views tend to be worth very little Tommy.

I really cannot stop laughing at such incredible paranoia.

So you believe it was a fix, you keep telling yourself that if it makes you feel better.

by Guest Sun May 24, 2015 6:17 pm

This lovely adorable Irish girl is going to explain to Tommy his views have no substance:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aEjGQB9BKWA

Laughing

by Guest Sun May 24, 2015 8:02 pm

Raggamuffin wrote:
Tommy Monk wrote:You are most welcome again rags!

I saw the homoNazi bigots taking turns in targeted attacks last night on here and was a target of their usual SIXHIRB style bullshit and other nastyness for daring to suggest that I was not convinced of the legitimacy of the vote in Ireland...

Bollocks to the fascist and bigoted homoNazis!!!

Yes, Sassy in particular was very rude and nasty to you for having a different opinion.

Can I ask why you think the vote was not legitimate?

Sassy & St.Eilzel of Cambodia are always like that but after the smashing of their beloved Labour & LibDem parties received,their bitterness knows no bounds.

by Guest Sun May 24, 2015 8:13 pm

what I want to know is this

WTF has it got to do with raggs and tommy anyhow....

and herein you see WHY i'm not a R/Wer either....

I find Tommys views positively dinosaurean
and raggs...well

pathetic

instead of congratulating a huge step forward in the self awareness of a nation and its awarenes of its responsibility to ALL its citizens

they both would prefer the old repressive ideas of centuries ago.....

doubtless as a druide, (and thats NOT a typo) they would like me burned at the stake (which is what my fate would be given so called christian views) since as a druid I am, especially among wiccans, taken as a "leader witch".(wiccans "generally" consider druids to be "holy ones" or "wise ones")

all I can say is well done the people of RoI

by Guest Sun May 24, 2015 8:15 pm

darknessss wrote:what I want to know is this

WTF has it got to do with raggs and tommy anyhow....

and herein you see WHY i'm not a R/Wer either....

I find Tommys views positively dinosaurean
and raggs...well

pathetic

instead of congratulating a huge step forward in the self awareness of a nation and its awarenes of its responsibility to ALL its citizens

they both would prefer the old repressive ideas of centuries ago.....

doubtless as a druide, (and thats NOT a typo) they would like me burned at the stake (which is what my fate would be given so called christian views) since as a druid I am, especially among wiccans, taken as a "leader witch".(wiccans "generally" consider druids to be "holy ones" or "wise ones")

all I can say is well done the people of RoI

+ one hundred trequinquagintillion,

by Tommy Monk Sun May 24, 2015 9:16 pm

Because of course... only one view is 'allowed'...

My views are not invalid because I don't subscribe to the view That homosexuality is equal to heterosexuality!!!

Two men are totally different to Two women and again totally different to a man and a woman as nature intended.

Surely being a druid darkness, you would appreciate this more than anyone...

"within Druidry, Nature is considered to be unconditionally
sacred and an expression or manifestation of deity and divinity".

You cannot support thirtap well as supporting unnatural human coupling that is totally against the way nature intended!

by Guest Sun May 24, 2015 9:29 pm

Now there is a self defeating argument by Tommy if I ever saw one because its is mi-skewed again to play off Victors beliefs making an unfounded claim it would conflict based on defining natural.
If other animals occur naturally in nature with homosexual copulation then it stands to reasons this would naturally occur in humans also, just another animal that has homosexuality.
Love is certainly natural to all humans, so how can two men who are in love be unnatural when love is natural? Love is universal to everything and is a natural part of humans, so homosexual love would be very natural.

Clearly this concept would be very much in Victors beliefs as right and natural.

by eddie Sun May 24, 2015 9:32 pm

Why can't we just have a thread where it's nice news and its received in a nice way?

by Guest Sun May 24, 2015 9:34 pm

eddie wrote:Why can't we just have a thread where it's nice news and its received in a nice way?

I second that motion.

by Guest Sun May 24, 2015 9:47 pm

Tommy Monk wrote:Because of course... only one view is 'allowed'...

My views are not invalid because I don't subscribe to the view That homosexuality is equal to heterosexuality!!!

Two men are totally different to Two women and again totally different to a man and a woman as nature intended.

Surely being a druid darkness, you would appreciate this more than anyone...

"within Druidry, Nature is considered to be unconditionally
sacred and an expression or manifestation of deity and divinity".

You cannot support thirtap well as supporting unnatural human coupling that is totally against the way nature intended!

except that you speak of which you have no understanding. you firstly are wrong in your assumption that "nature" intends anything

IF its possible then its allowable (provided that it harms no other and is consented to by those involved ....(and that is man made law, because as humans we can at times overide nature)
You secondly assume that LGBT relationships are less sacred than "straight" ones...you are again wrong
thirdly yu have NO basis of support for your claim that lgbt relationships are "unnatural"

the pagans have long accepted LGBT in their ranks...long before it was even decriminalised here.....recognising that LOVE between two people was greater than who or what they are.

so dont try to justify your insane kind of bigotry using a couple of random lines that are merely a general view of the world (and thus not definative) from our beliefs, it wont wash....

YOU might not subscribe to this view...that does NOT make you right or validate your point of view

the fact that SOCIETY in general is moving away from the POV that you hold indicates that your point of view in fact is no longer valid.....
(since it is only society and nothing else ...not nature not god not anything....... that makes judgement on this )

by Guest Sun May 24, 2015 9:48 pm

eddie wrote:Why can't we just have a thread where it's nice news and its received in a nice way?

because the hateful bigots alweays have to intrude their death throes on these things...they wouldnt feel "whole" without doing so....

by Ben Reilly Sun May 24, 2015 9:51 pm

darknessss wrote:
Tommy Monk wrote:Because of course... only one view is 'allowed'...

My views are not invalid because I don't subscribe to the view That homosexuality is equal to heterosexuality!!!

Two men are totally different to Two women and again totally different to a man and a woman as nature intended.

Surely being a druid darkness, you would appreciate this more than anyone...

"within Druidry, Nature is considered to be unconditionally
sacred and an expression or manifestation of deity and divinity".

You cannot support thirtap well as supporting unnatural human coupling that is totally against the way nature intended!

except that you speak of which you have no understanding. you firstly are wrong in your assumption that "nature" intends anything

IF its possible then its allowable (provided that it harms no other and is consented to by those involved ....(and that is man made law, because as humans we can at times overide nature)
You secondly assume that LGBT relationships are less sacred than "straight" ones...you are again wrong
thirdly yu have NO basis of support for your claim that lgbt relationships are "unnatural"

the pagans have long accepted LGBT in their ranks...long before it was even decriminalised here.....recognising that LOVE between two people was greater than who or what they are.

so dont try to justify your insane kind of bigotry using a couple of random lines that are merely a general view of the world (and thus not definative) from our beliefs, it wont wash....

YOU might not subscribe to this view...that does NOT make you right or validate your point of view

the fact that SOCIETY in general is moving away from the POV that you hold indicates that your point of view in fact is no longer valid.....
(since it is only society and nothing else ...not nature not god not anything....... that makes judgement on this )

by Tommy Monk Sun May 24, 2015 9:53 pm

Dodge you constantly try to bring up peoples religious views to try to trip them up.

Male and female in sex is natural And as nature designed it.

Pure and simple!

by Ben Reilly Sun May 24, 2015 9:55 pm

Tommy Monk wrote:Dodge you constantly try to bring up peoples religious views to try to trip them up.

Male and female in sex is natural And as nature designed it.

Pure and simple!

sim·ple - 4. of low or abnormally low intelligence.

by Guest Sun May 24, 2015 9:59 pm

Tommy Monk wrote:Dodge you constantly try to bring up peoples religious views to try to trip them up.
Male and female in sex is natural And as nature designed it.
Pure and simple!

So after Victor annihilated your poor views, you now are desperate to attempt to draw me into your own ignorance here? Sorry, but you have no leg to stand on. I will certainly question religious views when they teach inequality and discrimination, as they are views formed that do not have to be followed. Just as you would be critical of many aspects of Islam, of which I am too, so I am of many faiths. It does not mean I would deny them equality, far from it but shows how their faith in fact denies equality. All I am doing is trying to reason of which there is no harm in that. As again a person of pure faith does not doubt and would not be offended if challenged, they would actually rise to the challenge.
Love is natural, as Victor rightly stated as I did and where he excelled over me is that he rightly pointed out it is we as humans that judge, nothing else and hence why you are allowing yourself to be left behind with the rest of society. That is your own choosing.

by Tommy Monk Sun May 24, 2015 10:13 pm

Nobody has annihilated any of my views dodge... in fact the opposite...

by Guest Sun May 24, 2015 10:18 pm

no Tommy...we just consigned them to the trash bin of irrelevant history and bad science

Laughing

by Guest Sun May 24, 2015 10:22 pm

darknessss wrote:no Tommy...we just consigned them to the trash bin of irrelevant history and bad science

Now that is a fact.

Laughing

by Tommy Monk Sun May 24, 2015 10:36 pm

Not at all... you cannot consign beliefs based on nature to the trash bin by a rigged vote in Ireland...

by Guest Sun May 24, 2015 10:41 pm

Homosexuality is an evolutionary paradox in search for a resolution, not a medical condition in search for a cure. Homosexual behavior is common among social animals, and mainly expressed within the context of a bisexual sexual orientation. Exclusive homosexuality is less common, but not unique to humans. Poiani and Dixson invite the reader to embark on a journey through the evolutionary, biological, psychological and sociological aspects of homosexuality, seeking an understanding of both the proximate and evolutionary causes of homosexual behavior and orientation in humans, other mammals and birds. The authors also provide a synthesis of what we know about homosexuality into a biosocial model that links recent advances in reproductive skew theory and various selection mechanisms to produce a comprehensive framework that will be useful for anyone teaching or planning future research in this field.

Detailed analysis of the social and biological basis of homosexuality, providing a multidisciplinary approach
Provides an evolutionary perspective, showing similarities and differences with behaviours in other taxa, integrated into a comprehensive evolutionary framework
Discusses the issue in advanced detail including genetics, immunology and neuroendocrinology, providing a sound basis to the discussions

Ireland's Gay Day - Page 3 9780521145145

Ireland's Gay Day - Page 3 9780521145145

http://www.cambridge.org/gb/academic/subjects/life-sciences/animal-behaviour/animal-homosexuality-biosocial-perspective

by Guest Sun May 24, 2015 10:43 pm

List of mammals displaying homosexual behavior

Mammals

African Buffalo[21]
African Elephant[22]
Agile Wallaby[23]
Amazon River Dolphin[19]
American Bison[21][24]
Antelope[25]
Asian Elephant[22]
Asian house shrew[26]
Asiatic Lion[27]
Asiatic Mouflon[28]
Atlantic Spotted Dolphin[19]
Australian Sea Lion[29]
Barasingha[30]
Barbary Sheep[31]
Beluga[19]
Bharal[32]
Bighorn Sheep[31]
Black Bear[33]
Blackbuck[34]
Black-footed Rock Wallaby[23]
Black-tailed Deer[30]
Bonnet Macaque[14]
Bonobo[35][36][37]
Bottlenose Dolphin[19][38]
Bowhead Whale[19]
Brazilian Guinea Pig[39]
Bridled Dolphin[19]
Brown Bear[33]
Brown Capuchin[40]
Brown Long-eared Bat[41]
Brown Rat[42]
Buffalo[31]
Caribou[43]
Cat (domestic)[44]
Cattle (domestic)[45]
Chacma baboon[46]
Cheetah[27]
Chital[47]
Collared Peccary[48]
Commerson's Dolphin[19]
Common Brushtail Possum[49]
Common Chimpanzee[50]
Common Dolphin[19]
Common Marmoset[40]
Common Pipistrelle[51]
Common Raccoon[52]
Common Tree Shrew[53]
Cotton-top Tamarin[54]
Crab-eating Macaque[14]
Crested Black Macaque[14]
Dall's Sheep[31]
Daubenton's Bat[41]
Dog (domestic)[55]
Donkey[56]
Doria's Tree Kangaroo[23]
Dugong[57]
Dwarf Cavy[39]
Dwarf Mongoose[58]
Eastern Cottontail Rabbit[42]
Eastern Grey Kangaroo[23]
Elk[30]
Euro (a subspecies of wallaroo)[23]
European Bison[21]
Fallow Deer[30]
False Killer Whale[19]
Fat-tailed Dunnart[59]
Fin Whale[19]
Fox[60]
Gazelle[25]
Gelada Baboon[61]
Giraffe[4][25][62]
Goat (Domestic)[31]
Golden Monkey[63]
Gorilla[64]
Grant's Gazelle[25]
Grey-headed Flying Fox[41]
Grey Seal[29]
Grey squirrel[65]
Grey Whale[19][20]
Grey Wolf[66]
Grizzly Bear[33]
Guinea Pig (Domestic)[39]
Hamadryas Baboon[61]
Hamster (Domestic)[39]
Hanuman Langur[67]
Harbor Porpoise[68]
Harbor Seal[29]
Himalayan Tahr[69]
Hoary Marmot[70]
Horse (domestic)[71]
Human (see Human sexual behavior)
Indian Fruit Bat[41]
Indian Muntjac[72]
Indian Rhinoceros[73]
Japanese Macaque[14]
Javelina[74]
Kangaroo Rat[42]
Killer Whale[19]
Koala[75]
Kob[15][76]
Larga Seal[29]
Least Chipmunk[65]
Lechwe[76]
Lesser Bushbaby[77]
Lion[27][78][79][80][81][82]
Lion-tailed Macaque[14]
Lion Tamarin[40]
Little Brown Bat[41]
Livingstone's Fruit Bat[41]
Long-eared Hedgehog[83]
Long-footed Tree Shrew[53]
Macaque[84]
Markhor[85]
Marten[52]
Matschie's Tree Kangaroo[23]
Moco[86]
Mohol Galago[77]
Moor Macaque[14]
Moose[87]
Mountain Goat[31]
Mountain Tree Shrew[53]
Mountain Zebra[88]
Mouse (domestic)[89]
Moustached Tamarin[54]
Mule Deer[30]
Musk-ox[90]
Natterer's Bat[41]
New Zealand Sea Lion[29]
Nilgiri Langur[67]
Noctule[51]
North American Porcupine[91]
Northern Elephant Seal[29]
Northern Fur Seal[29]
Northern Quoll[59]
Olympic Marmot[92]
Orangutan[93]
Pacific Striped Dolphin[19]
Patas Monkey[94]
Pere David's Deer[30]
Pig (Domestic)[95]
Pig-tailed Macaque[14]
Plains Zebra[96]
Polar Bear[33]
Pretty-faced Wallaby[23]
Proboscis Monkey[63]
Pronghorn[97]
Przewalski's Horse[88]
Pudú[47]
Puku[98]
Quokka[99]
Rabbit[100]
Raccoon[52]
Raccoon Dog[101]
Red Deer[30]
Red Fox[102]
Red Kangaroo[23]
Red-necked Wallaby[23]
Red Squirrel[65]
Reeves's Muntjac[72]
Reindeer[43]
Rhesus Macaque[14]
Right Whale[19]
Rock Cavy[39]
Rodrigues Fruit Bat[41]
Roe Deer[30]
Rufous Bettong[103]
Rufous-naped Tamarin[54]
Rufous Rat Kangaroo[23]
Saddle-back Tamarin[54]
Savanna Baboon[61]
Sea Otter[104]
Serotine Bat[41]
Sheep (Domestic)[31][105]
Siamang[106]
Sika Deer[30]
Slender Tree Shrew[53]
Sooty Mangabey[94]
Sperm Whale[19]
Spinifex Hopping Mouse[42]
Spinner Dolphin[19]
Spotted Hyena[16][18]
Spotted Seal[29]
Squirrel Monkey[107]
Striped Dolphin[19]
Stuart's Marsupial Mouse[108]
Sika deer[109]
Stumptail Macaque[14]
Swamp Deer[30]
Swamp Wallaby[23]
Takhi[88]
Talapoin[94]
Tammar Wallaby[23]
Tasmanian Devil[108]
Tibetan Macaque[110]
Tasmanian Rat Kangaroo[23]
Thinhorn Sheep[31]
Thomson's Gazelle[25]
Tiger[111]
Tonkean Macaque[14]
Tucuxi[112]
Urial[113]
Vampire Bat[41]
Verreaux's Sifaka[114]
Vervet[94]
Vicuna[115]
Walrus[116][117]
Wapiti[118]
Warthog[119]
Waterbuck[120]
Water Buffalo[31]
Weeper Capuchin[40]
Western Grey Kangaroo[23]
West Indian Manatee[121]
Whiptail Wallaby[23]
White-faced Capuchin[40]
White-fronted Capuchin[40]
White-handed Gibbon[122]
White-lipped Peccary[123]
White-tailed Deer[30]
Wild Cavy[39]
Wild Goat[31]
Wisent[21]
Yellow-bellied marmot[109]
Yellow-footed Rock Wallaby[23]
Yellow-toothed Cavy[39]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_mammals_displaying_homosexual_behavior

by Guest Sun May 24, 2015 10:45 pm

In "slip-and-slide" orgies, groups of male grey whales, one of the oldest species of mammals, roll in the ocean rubbing their bellies against each other so that their genitals are touching.[19][20]

by Guest Sun May 24, 2015 10:46 pm

by Sponsored content