Why Do Some Continue To Protect The Filthy Rich Elite?

25th June 2014

The answer is they just don't understand.

Those who vote Labour, the Conservatives and Lib Dems mistakenly believe they are protecting the low paid.  But these three Parties are hell bent on looking after the rich, and themselves.

Bringing in millions of foreigners - what jobs will they take?  The low paid jobs of course, feeding the business owners.

Refugees, asylum seekers - where will they be schooled?  The poor schools of course, not enough foreign speaking teachers, no attention for the poor English kids.

The rich kids will be ferried to their out of town posh schools.

You think you're doing the right thing.

You're not.

Struggling inner city schools are being swamped with asylum seeker children while those that top the league tables take none.
The scandalous system, which makes a mockery of Labour's claims to deliver social justice, is exposed in figures obtained by The Mail on Sunday.
They show that in the London borough where the Prime Minister has had both his own sons educated, four state secondary schools take all the 373 asylum seeker children in the area, while three other privileged state schools take none.
Not surprisingly, pupils at the schools in Hammersmith and Fulham that help educate the would-be refugees are more than three times as likely to fail their GCSEs.
Their average pass rate (five A-C GCSEs) is just 27 per cent compared with 88 per cent for the schools that are exempt from the process.
Equally unsurprisingly, the London Oratory, where Tony Blair's sons Euan and Nicky are both pupils, is one of those schools that takes no asylum seeker children at all.
The system was attacked by headmaster of Phoenix High, William Atkinson, who once served on the Government's task force for raising school standards.
He said: 'The system is unfair. The asylum seeker children are concentrated in a few schools in our borough and those that have them become trapped in a vicious circle.
'We have spaces because we have a high turnover of asylum seeker children, so we end up getting more.
'Other schools which are high achieving never have spaces [ precisely] because they are high achieving, so they never take any of these children in.'
Mr Atkinson, whose school has 135 children of asylum seekers and struggles with an 11 per cent A-C GCSE pass rate, added: 'It is very difficult for us to cope. When you have a class of 25 to 30 youngsters and some do not speak English, do you cater for those children at the expense of the majority or teach the majority and ignore those youngsters who need help with English?
'It's an impossible position which only affects struggling schools. The Government, if it is committed to social justice, should ensure that they are fairly distributed.' His comments were backed by fellow head, Veronique Gerber from the Hurlingham and Chelsea school.
'It is difficult when you have to find teachers to help new pupils learn English - although they often prove to be the most motivated and ambitious pupils once they have that skill,' she said.
'However, the system we have is totally unjust and it goes across the board.'
Another local teacher revealed: 'It is incredibly disruptive. Our school roll yo-yos up and down and you don't know who you'll be teaching from one day to the next. This week we had 10 Somalians. They'll probably be moved on again very soon.'
Such problems are alien to neighbouring schools like the London Oratory where some pupils travel 60 miles to attend.


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-112979/Struggling-schools-swamped-asylum-seekers.html#ixzz35bS4IDN9

So which party do you think we should vote for to change it so that the low paid are looked after and should the asylum seekers be spread more evenly across all the schools?

Irn Bru wrote:So which party do you think we should vote for to change it so that the low paid are looked after and should the asylum seekers be spread more evenly across all the schools?

I'm talking about improving things for English children Iron, not foreigners.

BigAndy9 wrote:

Irn Bru wrote:So which party do you think we should vote for to change it so that the low paid are looked after and should the asylum seekers be spread more evenly across all the schools?

I'm talking about improving things for English children Iron, not foreigners.

Well would you like to change the title of the thread to reflect that instead of posting it as something suggesting that you are trying to get a better deal for the poor?

Can I ask again - So which party do you think we should vote for to change it so that the low paid are looked after and should the asylum seekers be spread more evenly across all the schools?

Oh yes...people are so daft and off their rocker for voting any of the big 3, silly us...


Now Andy, I'm rather interested in Irn's question to you , but more so your answer!

Joy Division wrote:Oh yes...people are so daft and off their rocker for voting any of the big 3, silly us...


Now Andy, I'm rather interested in Irn's question to you , but more so your answer!

We'll just have to wait and see, JD, but it's late now and time to hit the sack.

CYA tomorrow

Irn Bru wrote:

Joy Division wrote:Oh yes...people are so daft and off their rocker for voting any of the big 3, silly us...


Now Andy, I'm rather interested in Irn's question to you , but more so your answer!

We'll just have to wait and see, JD, but it's late now and time to hit the sack.

CYA tomorrow

...ok Irn, we will ghee him a 24 hour head start to ghee him time tae think again!!

 ::lightsab:: 

Night Irn.

Democracy (these days) does tend to protect the rich, but what the hell are we supposed to turn to, dictatorship? With the likes of BigAndy at the helm?

The pace of history basically dictates that we're going to tackle these problems at a certain speed (and that the reason we don't go faster can be expressed in one word, "conservatives" -- just analyze Obamacare), so yeah, we will be a more equal society ... when all of us are dead and gone ... much like the vast majority of the abolitionists lived and died before slavery was done away with.