Student outrages his date by refusing to pay for her £100 meal while his cost SIX TIMES less at £16 - but do you think he was right not to get out his wallet?

First topic message reminder :

His dinner had come to just €17.50 while her lobster and wine was €110

In the thread shared on BoredPanda, titled 'Well... There goes the "friendship" with her' the man explains that his date's food bill had been more than six times more than his own and he felt he was justified in his decision not to pay.

Sharing screenshots of their conversation he reveals that he had attempted to ask her out on a second date.

She responded: 'After what you did to me last time you expect me to go out with you again? Wow.'

The baffled redditor then asks what he had done wrong to which she replies: 'You made me pay for my own food and drink while you paid for only yours wtf'.

The man then replies to explain that he felt it would be unfair for him to pay so much more for his meal when he had ordered far less.

He wrote: 'So? You invited me lol, you are lucky you didn't pay for my food too, plus I got a carbonara and a beer while you got lobster and €80 (£72, $92 US) wine.'



https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-6565477/Student-receives-torrent-abuse-date-refused-pay-meal.html

Syl wrote:

Thor wrote:


How is it ridiculous?

As again how often have you ever expected a mate to pay for you?

My views are the same towards men and women on this

Its nothing short of prostitution for someone to expect someone else pay for them

As then that friendship or relationship has a monetary value to this

Do you understand this?

What you fail to grasp is that this stems from is where men thought they could basically sell their daughters, which still happens today

Hence anyone applying this view, is adopting the mentality of a by-gone age,.where it was expected of men to pay for their time with women

So its me actually fighting against sexism, where as some of you wish to relive this, by dfending such a notion on monetary value

 If a man now thinks he is entitled to sex because he has paid for dinner....that just shows how little respect that man has for women in general.
If the woman expects the man to pay for everything she probably just wants a free meal out.

Viva la difference.

So you are telling me that no man or women expects to eventually have sex, once in a relationship?

So how is it any different when a woman wants a free meal, from where a woman or man expects to be paid for their time?

Hence zero difference, as they have the same mentality

They have the mentality of a buisness transaction

Hence like an escort or prostitute

How many times are you going to avoid my actual questions?

Have to leave with this, that I have posted before

Night everyone 

Thor wrote:

Syl wrote:


 If a man now thinks he is entitled to sex because he has paid for dinner....that just shows how little respect that man has for women in general.
If the woman expects the man to pay for everything she probably just wants a free meal out.

Viva la difference.

So you are telling me that no man or women expects to eventually have sex, once in a relationship?

So how is it any different when a woman wants a free meal, from where a woman or man expects to be paid for their time?

Hence zero difference, as they have the same mentality

They have the mentality of a buisness transaction

Hence like an escort or prostitute

How many times are you going to avoid my actual questions?

It's a discussion not an episode of Question time.
I have given my view, you have given yours, you obviously regard any woman who accepts a dinner out as a potential prostitute, I dont.

Move on.

Syl wrote:

Thor wrote:


So you are telling me that no man or women expects to eventually have sex, once in a relationship?

So how is it any different when a woman wants a free meal, from where a woman or man expects to be paid for their time?

Hence zero difference, as they have the same mentality

They have the mentality of a buisness transaction

Hence like an escort or prostitute

How many times are you going to avoid my actual questions?

It's a discussion not an episode of Question time.
I have given my view, you have given yours, you obviously regard any woman who accepts a dinner out as a potential prostitute, I dont.

Move on.

A one sided discussion when you continually avoid answring and offer excuses for not answering points

You then try and twist so poorly what I said, as you know you are acting a complete imbicille, as at no poiont did I claim the above

I said no matter a man or woman that expects a person to pay for them.  Grown up in this day and age, is no better than a prostitute. I never claimed someone that accepts a dinner

So stop pathetically lying or at least wash your mouth out with soap

OMG, read the thread back tomorrow when your head may be clearer,
Night.

Syl wrote:OMG, read the thread back tomorrow when your head may  be clearer,
Night.

So when exposed for lying you want my head to be clear

Its very clear thanks

I suggest you go to specsavers if you cannot tell the difference between accept and expect

Good luck washing your mouth out

Thor wrote:

Syl wrote:OMG, read the thread back tomorrow when your head may  be clearer,
Night.

So when exposed for lying you want my head to be clear

Its very clear thanks

I suggest you go to specsavers if you cannot tell the difference between accept and expect

Good luck washing your mouth out

This has been your mantra throughout the thread.

So why would it be wrong to justify sex, when she is acting like a prostitute expecting her time be paid for?

Whether she accepts or expects, neither way should she be expected or obliged to pay for her dinner (or time as you keep saying) with sex.

And dont call me a liar just because you are tying  yourself up in knots.

Syl wrote:

Thor wrote:


So when exposed for lying you want my head to be clear

Its very clear thanks

I suggest you go to specsavers if you cannot tell the difference between accept and expect

Good luck washing your mouth out

This has been your mantra throughout the thread.

So why would it be wrong to justify sex, when she is acting like a prostitute expecting her time be paid for?

Whether she accepts or expects, neither way should she be expected or obliged to pay for her dinner (or time as you keep saying) with sex.

And dont call me a liar just because you are tying  yourself up in knots.

You see I said expecting to be paid for.  You however lied and claimed I said someone who accepts a dinner is like a prostitute. Which is what you always do. When you cannot counter back.

Right.

Why cannot someone expect sex, when he/she is meeting someone who expects their time to be paid for?

Who else does that?

What you fail to see is the double standard

Watch the video I posted

Yes you did lie, which all can see you did

Oh do shut up Didge. I dont lie and I think everyone who knows me knows it.
What you always try to do is look for a loophole to crawl into and bang that to death when someone has gotten the better of you.

Instead of posting videos and demanding people watch them (which I have no intention of doing by the way)  concentrate on what you are writing yourself.

Syl wrote:Oh do shut up Didge. I dont lie and I think everyone who knows me knows it.
What you always try to do is look for a loophole to crawl into and bang that to death when someone has gotten the better of you.

Instead of posting videos and demanding people watch them (which I have no intention of doing by the way)  concentrate on what you are writing yourself.

Yes you did lie

You claim I said people that accept a meal are prostitutes

Do you want me to post that comment again?

Then show me anywhere that I claimed that

It shows you have zero humility, where i at least admit when wrong

You were trying to get a rise and it failed poorly all because you could not even register the point I was making on a double standard

Never demanded but asked, you see another poor play on words, all because you always have to act thios when unable to answer points

Syl wrote:

Thor wrote:


So you are telling me that no man or women expects to eventually have sex, once in a relationship?

So how is it any different when a woman wants a free meal, from where a woman or man expects to be paid for their time?

Hence zero difference, as they have the same mentality

They have the mentality of a buisness transaction

Hence like an escort or prostitute

How many times are you going to avoid my actual questions?

It's a discussion not an episode of Question time.
I have given my view, you have given yours, you obviously regard any woman who accepts a dinner out as a potential prostitute, I dont.

Move on.

Show me anywhere I claimed this?

If not I suggest you eat humble pie

Thor wrote:

Syl wrote:

It's a discussion not an episode of Question time.
I have given my view, you have given yours, you obviously regard any woman who accepts a dinner out as a potential prostitute, I dont.

Move on.

Show me anywhere I claimed this?

If not I suggest you eat humble pie

Humble pie??….and would you EXPECT me to pay for that myself?

I have already said that whether she accepts or expects in no way should a woman feel obliged to perform sex in return for the man paying....if the man EXPECTS that he is a creep and a predator.

Seems you think the woman is acting like a prostitute if she EXPECTS the man to pay......not sure what sort of prostitues you know, but the usual barter is sex for money not free food.

Syl wrote:

Thor wrote:

Show me anywhere I claimed this?

If not I suggest you eat humble pie

Humble pie??….and would you EXPECT me to pay for that myself?

I have already said that whether she accepts or expects in no way should a woman feel obliged to perform sex in return for the man paying....if the man EXPECTS that  he is a creep and a predator.

Seems you think the woman is acting like a prostitute if she EXPECTS the man to pay......not sure what sort of prostitues you know, but the usual barter is sex for money not free food.

So you again have zero humility or the ability to admit when wrong as at no point did I claimed that and even more warped thinks its funny to deny you did lie

Wow

I think any man or woman, again for about the tenth time, that expects someone else to pay for their time on a date is acting like a prostitute. As they are basically expecting to be paid for their time and not treating that relationship equally

So lets see if the penny will fnally drop

Of course no woman or man should think they have to have sex if someone expects it

Just as no man or woman should think they have to pay, if someone expects it

Hence why if someone expects to be paid for, then why again would it be then wrong for the person paying to expect sex, based on the expectations of the other person?

Try and use your brain for once

she is better off without him, clearly she is a lady of good taste and has every right to expect that her gentleman consort for the evening be of the right social standard. Clearly she made a mistake be even entertaining this peasant (who it is clear can hardly afford a Mcd's for two) rather than someone of s similar social status to her own.

Didge...Nothing wrong with my brain thanks.
You have clutched on your use of a single word to wriggle out of the fact you really have scant respect for women....calling them prostitutes because they have accepted dinner and expected the man to pay.

Thats OK, just stop trying to cover your tracks so hard.

Lord Foul wrote:she is better off without him, clearly she is a lady of good taste and has every right to expect that her gentleman consort for the evening be of the right social standard. Clearly she made a mistake be even entertaining this peasant (who it is clear can hardly afford a Mcd's for two) rather than someone of s similar social status to her own.

She is clearly a cheeky cow, I think everyone is in agreement on that.

Syl wrote:Didge...Nothing wrong with my brain thanks.
You have clutched on your use of a single word to wriggle out of the fact you really have scant respect for women....calling them prostitutes because they have accepted dinner and expected the man to pay.

Thats OK, just stop trying to cover your tracks so hard.

Okay, as you have zero humility, failing to respond to countless points and the utter blatant cheek to lie, even when exposed to you

I am placing you on ignore until you learn some humility

Enjoy Coventry, as I have no time for people that cannot admit to mistakes

When you learn to admit or at least apologise, then our conversations will resume

Thor wrote:

Syl wrote:Didge...Nothing wrong with my brain thanks.
You have clutched on your use of a single word to wriggle out of the fact you really have scant respect for women....calling them prostitutes because they have accepted dinner and expected the man to pay.

Thats OK, just stop trying to cover your tracks so hard.

Okay, as you have zero humility, failing to respond to countless points and the utter blatant cheek to lie, even when exposed to you

I am placing you on ignore until you learn some humility

Enjoy Coventry, as I have no time for people that cannot admit to mistakes

When you learn to admit or at least apologise, then our conversations will resume

.I'm devastated.

Syl wrote:

Thor wrote:

Okay, as you have zero humility, failing to respond to countless points and the utter blatant cheek to lie, even when exposed to you

I am placing you on ignore until you learn some humility

Enjoy Coventry, as I have no time for people that cannot admit to mistakes

When you learn to admit or at least apologise, then our conversations will resume

.I'm devastated.

Lucky bitch

Thor wrote:

Syl wrote:Didge...Nothing wrong with my brain thanks.
You have clutched on your use of a single word to wriggle out of the fact you really have scant respect for women....calling them prostitutes because they have accepted dinner and expected the man to pay.

Thats OK, just stop trying to cover your tracks so hard.

Okay, as you have zero humility, failing to respond to countless points and the utter blatant cheek to lie, even when exposed to you

I am placing you on ignore until you learn some humility

Enjoy Coventry, as I have no time for people that cannot admit to mistakes

When you learn to admit or at least apologise, then our conversations will resume

oh my fucking sides,,,,,i can't breathe

gelico wrote:

Thor wrote:

Okay, as you have zero humility, failing to respond to countless points and the utter blatant cheek to lie, even when exposed to you

I am placing you on ignore until you learn some humility

Enjoy Coventry, as I have no time for people that cannot admit to mistakes

When you learn to admit or at least apologise, then our conversations will resume

oh my fucking sides,,,,,i can't breathe

It's a bit lacking in the 'Secret Sauce of Kindness'.....

He sounds like a Victorian father admonishing his child for displeasing him in some imaginary way....silly bugger.