Poor baby P's mum

First topic message reminder :





The mother of Baby P - who allowed him to be tortured to death - is demanding the council give her a bigger house as she "suffered" with the loss of her son.

Tracey Connelly wants to be bumped up the waiting list for a two-bedroom home as she believes she is entitled to special treatment.

A source told the Mirror: "She is extremely demanding, and for Tracey it's all about her. She wants her own nice flat but when you come out of jail you get what you are given, but Tracey won't accept that.

"The greatest irony is that she sees herself as the victim in all of this, so expects to be looked after."

Connelly was jailed in 2009 for allowing her boyfriend Steven Barker and his brother Jason Owen to torture her son, Peter, to death.

The little boy was found dead in 2007 aged just 17 months. His body was covered in horrific injuries including a broken back.

She was released last year after a parole board deemed she was not a threat to the public.

Connelly is currently living in a bail hostel in the north of England awaiting re-housing.

If she were to fall pregnant she would face a legal battle to keep the child as social services would push for the child to be taken out of her care.

Such a case would likely be paid for by legal aid at a cost to the taxpayer.

http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2014/02/09/baby-ps-mother-tracey-connelly-wants-bigger-house-_n_4756783.html?utm_hp_ref=uk

NemsAgain wrote:



The mother of Baby P - who allowed him to be tortured to death - is demanding the council give her a bigger house as she "suffered" with the loss of her son.

Tracey Connelly wants to be bumped up the waiting list for a two-bedroom home as she believes she is entitled to special treatment.

A source told the Mirror: "She is extremely demanding, and for Tracey it's all about her. She wants her own nice flat but when you come out of jail you get what you are given, but Tracey won't accept that.

"The greatest irony is that she sees herself as the victim in all of this, so expects to be looked after."

Connelly was jailed in 2009 for allowing her boyfriend Steven Barker and his brother Jason Owen to torture her son, Peter, to death.

The little boy was found dead in 2007 aged just 17 months. His body was covered in horrific injuries including a broken back.

She was released last year after a parole board deemed she was not a threat to the public.

Connelly is currently living in a bail hostel in the north of England awaiting re-housing.

If she were to fall pregnant she would face a legal battle to keep the child as social services would push for the child to be taken out of her care.

Such a case would likely be paid for by legal aid at a cost to the taxpayer.

http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2014/02/09/baby-ps-mother-tracey-connelly-wants-bigger-house-_n_4756783.html?utm_hp_ref=uk

she is entitled to special treatment her own special spot in hell for all eternity...howw sick can shebe

The left run our schools, the left run our border agencies and social services.

It is much harder to convince people to be tough on others - much harder to convince people to say NO to foreigners when they tell you life is so hard in their country.

It is much harder to convince people to say that you need to be tough with those on benefits or they will always be on them.

It's tough, but it is so right.

BigAndy9 wrote:The left run our schools, the left run our border agencies and social services.

It is much harder to convince people to be tough on others - much harder to convince people to say NO to foreigners when they tell you life is so hard in their country.

It is much harder to convince people to say that you need to be tough with those on benefits or they will always be on them.

It's tough, but it is so right.

The left run the public sector full stop. Even Thatcher couldn't break their grip. Who implements Government policy the civil servants.Wh do the civil servant serve? Themselves.

labour revival wrote:

BigAndy9 wrote:
The left run our schools, the left run our border agencies and social services.

It is much harder to convince people to be tough on others - much harder to convince people to say NO to foreigners when they tell you life is so hard in their country.

It is much harder to convince people to say that you need to be tough with those on benefits or they will always be on them.

It's tough, but it is so right.

The left run the public sector full stop. Even Thatcher couldn't break their grip. Who implements Government policy the civil servants.Wh do the civil servant serve? Themselves.

  

YOU TWO really do talk a load of cobblers !!!!

The truth would be a foreign country to you and yours..

 :-:bravo:-: 

No Beekeeper - labour revival is quite correct - I would say that 99% of people who are in a trade union are left wing Labour supporters and most public sector workers are left wing Labour supporters.

The armed forces probably aren't - but they're not in any younians!

BigAndy9 wrote:No Beekeeper - labour revival is quite correct - I would say that 99% of people who are in a trade union are left wing Labour supporters and most public sector workers are left wing Labour supporters.

The armed forces probably aren't - but they're not in any younians!

Good afternoon BA.

You're right of course about the left & one of Camerons biggest mistakes is that he didn't remove or break up the quangos that are occupied mainly by lefties.......as he said he would do.

My belief is that he didn't remove them because at heart he is a L/Winger so he supports them and also when he is ousted as PM,probably after the GE,he will have a cushy job within one of these quangos to go to.

Cameron like Blair & Brown is thinking forward to his next job as he like many others knows that come the GE,he will be gone.

BigAndy9 wrote:No Beekeeper - labour revival is quite correct - I would say that 99% of people who are in a trade union are left wing Labour supporters and most public sector workers are left wing Labour supporters.

The armed forces probably aren't - but they're not in any younians!

What does that tell you then?

The RW are greedy, selfish and don't want workers to have rights.

Anyway...how the hell did this thread become about politics?, it's about the idiot 'mother' of this tragic wee boy.

Its about the fact that politics have led us to a situation where a women responsible for the torture and death of her child can complain she wants a bigger house and have those complaints listened to.

I haven't seen a cogent argument from our illustrious left wingers on here rebutting my point the lefties support scum like this.

As for Cameron and the Quangos Shad you are right with one caveat. He is in a coalition the Liberals are big government just like Labour. I do think he is left wing though which is why I laugh at the lefties. Had the Tories had a real Right wing leader the Quangos would have been decimated.

Joy Division wrote:

BigAndy9 wrote:No Beekeeper - labour revival is quite correct - I would say that 99% of people who are in a trade union are left wing Labour supporters and most public sector workers are left wing Labour supporters.

The armed forces probably aren't - but they're not in any younians!

What does that tell you then?

The RW are greedy, selfish and don't want workers to have rights.

Let us say that 20 people go and work for a company.

Who will have rights?

Who will get on at that company?

The answer is the ones who work hard. Is that so wrong JD, or do you believe that no matter how sh1t you are you should have the same rights to promotion, to perks as the guy who is working twice as hard as you?

You don't need to bully the boss to get rights, you just have to earn them.

sphinx wrote:Its about the fact that politics have led us to a situation where a women responsible for the torture and death of her child can complain she wants a bigger house and have those complaints listened to.

"she's served her time"

"she has the same rights as everybody else"

"everybody deserves to be treated with respect"

"she deserves to live, not just to survive"

You get the message.

She's asking for an extra bedroom she doesn't need and to be bumped up the waiting list. Why on earth should an ex criminal's housing "needs" be put over those who are law abiding and need somewhere to live? Why should her demands be put over the rights of a family or the disabled who need extra space for equipment etc.

It's not as though she hasn't got a roof over her head. She's is fortunate, not everyone has that luxury and I doubt very much she's paying for her accommodation   

I'm surprised that she made it through prison bearing in mind her crime.

feelthelove wrote:She's asking for an extra bedroom she doesn't need and to be bumped up the waiting list. Why on earth should an ex criminal's housing "needs" be put over those who are law abiding and need somewhere to live?  Why should her demands be put over the rights of a family or the disabled who need extra space for equipment etc.

It's not as though she hasn't got a roof over her head.  She's is fortunate, not everyone has that luxury and I doubt very much she's paying for her accommodation   

I'm surprised that she made it through prison bearing in mind her crime.

Indeed. She will have been protected by the liberal lefties.

labour revival wrote:I haven't seen a cogent argument from our illustrious left wingers on here rebutting my point the lefties support scum like this.

As for Cameron and the Quangos Shad you are right with one caveat. He is in a coalition the Liberals are big government just like Labour. I do think he is left wing though which is why I laugh at the lefties. Had the Tories had a real Right wing leader the Quangos would have been decimated.

I haven't seen or heard of anyone om here defending this woman in any way whatsoever.

You just make things up in the hope that people will believe you.

BigAndy9 wrote:

Joy Division wrote:


What does that tell you then?

The RW are greedy, selfish and don't want workers to have rights.

Let us say that 20 people go and work for a company.

Who will have rights?

Who will get on at that company?

The answer is the ones who work hard.   Is that so wrong JD, or do you believe that no matter how sh1t you are you should have the same rights to promotion, to perks as the guy who is working twice as hard as you?

You don't need to bully the boss to get rights, you just have to earn them.

..oh no no non Andy, I'm not taking about promotions,mim talking the rights of workers, as in pay, safety, holidays etc...

Very one should have that right should they not?, or should that just be a thing for the privileged few?

labour revival wrote:

feelthelove wrote:She's asking for an extra bedroom she doesn't need and to be bumped up the waiting list. Why on earth should an ex criminal's housing "needs" be put over those who are law abiding and need somewhere to live?  Why should her demands be put over the rights of a family or the disabled who need extra space for equipment etc.

It's not as though she hasn't got a roof over her head.  She's is fortunate, not everyone has that luxury and I doubt very much she's paying for her accommodation   

I'm surprised that she made it through prison bearing in mind her crime.

Indeed. She will have been protected by the liberal lefties.

Yer like a wee bairn a Drinky, looking to pick a fight   

Joy Division wrote:

labour revival wrote:

Indeed. She will have been protected by the liberal lefties.

Yer like a wee bairn a Drinky, looking to pick a fight   

Best leave it JD, lets not let another thread descend into chaos.

I guess she must have been in protective custody? She would have been perceived to be at risk bearing in mind what she'd done?  

labour revival wrote:

Sassy wrote:You do have a habit of stating things without proof.

I think Staines has a point Sassy. The left did lobby for the death penalty to be removed. The moment it was they lobbied for life not to mean life. How is this at odds with the facts. Are you suggesting the right lobbied for lenient sentences I think you will be hard pressed to support that theory. Do you think it is right wingers who will be molly coddling this bitch I assure you it won't. Do you think t will be right wingers finding all sort of theories why she isn't to blame. No wrong again it will be the liberal lefties.

Feel free to show otherwise I will enjoy hearing your rebuttal.

Well, you would think Staines has a point, wouldn't you Drinky, Why do you think voting against the death penalty equates with letting killers run free? I think you will find that those that are against the death penalty are for real life terms.

SEXY MAMA wrote:Bloody witch. I hope she never has children again.

You voted this government in

Don't cry now

Sassy wrote:

labour revival wrote:

I think Staines has a point Sassy. The left did lobby for the death penalty to be removed. The moment it was they lobbied for life not to mean life. How is this at odds with the facts. Are you suggesting the right lobbied for lenient sentences I think you will be hard pressed to support that theory. Do you think it is right wingers who will be molly coddling this bitch I assure you it won't. Do you think t will be right wingers finding all sort of theories why she isn't to blame. No wrong again it will be the liberal lefties.

Feel free to show otherwise I will enjoy hearing your rebuttal.

Well, you would think Staines has a point, wouldn't you Drinky,   Why do you think voting against the death penalty equates with letting killers run free?   I think you will find that those that are against the death penalty are for real life terms.  

Bollox

You mean the ones you haven't got?

I don't understand why left wing activist do support seriously nasty people like her. It undermines the lefts cause when these those misguided people speak up for monsters like her. I'm with right wingers on this issue she should have been locked up much longer and on release given nothing.

she should have been BURNED...at the stake...

victorismyhero wrote:she should have been BURNED...at the stake...

Agree Victor, cruelty to children and animals   Breaks my heart honestly x

Phoenix wrote:I don't understand why left wing activist do support seriously nasty people like her. It undermines the lefts cause when these those misguided people speak up for monsters like her. I'm with right wingers on this issue she should have been locked up much longer and on release given nothing.

What does that have to do with the LW....Tory Scum!

Who is it that are constantly bleating for "softer sentencing" softer prisons, less custodial sentences, stupid schemes like letting thugs off if the "apologise" to their victims etc...who is it that have all but destroyed "Justice"

surprise...the "left" and the "liberal"

Phoenix wrote:I don't understand why left wing activist do support seriously nasty people like her. It undermines the lefts cause when these those misguided people speak up for monsters like her. I'm with right wingers on this issue she should have been locked up much longer and on release given nothing.

I haven't seen anyone defend this woman or people who have committed crimes like she has from either the left or the right.

Have you got an example of this that I can look into?

All I have seen is people saying she should never have been let out!