New rule on avatars -- made unilaterally by Ben
+5
Original Quill
Andy
Syl
eddie
Ben Reilly
9 posters
Page 2 of 2
Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
New rule on avatars -- made unilaterally by Ben
First topic message reminder :
Every once in a while I feel I need to do something on my own, if only to save the other admins any complaints. If you have a problem with this new rule, bring it to me and me alone.
Here's the new rule, which will be enforced immediately:
Every once in a while I feel I need to do something on my own, if only to save the other admins any complaints. If you have a problem with this new rule, bring it to me and me alone.
Here's the new rule, which will be enforced immediately:
http://www.newsfixboard.com/h1-about-newsfix-who-we-are-the-rules wrote:... (A)vatars or signatures that contain images or text deemed to be offensive to any ethnic, religious or national group, or to people of any gender identity or sexual orientation, by the administrative team may be removed, and members may be subjected to any disciplinary action.
Last edited by Ben Reilly on Thu Jan 05, 2017 8:54 pm; edited 2 times in total
Re: New rule on avatars -- made unilaterally by Ben
HYPOCRITE = uniquely speaking out of both sides of her head while critizing 'SOME' members for things she find issues with and ignoring other members that do the same and then she's allowed to get away with the her ABUSE!HoratioTarr wrote:Rubbish. If you only answered the post we'd all sound like automatons. The whole point of a forum is interaction and chat, connecting with the poster or challenging the poster, having banter, having a laugh, being sympathetic, sharing, caring, and from time to time, clashing.eddie wrote:It is the only way to use a debate forum otherwise one is spending half the time arguing over nonsense.
And then posts bilge like that Indeed, that's "RUBBISH"
Now you know how we feel with your posts crammed with smiileys and CAPS and colons etc.
Guest- Guest
Re: New rule on avatars -- made unilaterally by Ben
I think Ben should make this the Newsfix Anthem lol
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SjXcBXgNpPE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SjXcBXgNpPE
Guest- Guest
Re: New rule on avatars -- made unilaterally by Ben
4EVER2 wrote:HYPOCRITE = uniquely speaking out of both sides of her head while critizing 'SOME' members for things she find issues with and ignoring other members that do the same and then she's allowed to get away with the her ABUSE!HoratioTarr wrote:Rubbish. If you only answered the post we'd all sound like automatons. The whole point of a forum is interaction and chat, connecting with the poster or challenging the poster, having banter, having a laugh, being sympathetic, sharing, caring, and from time to time, clashing.eddie wrote:It is the only way to use a debate forum otherwise one is spending half the time arguing over nonsense.
And then posts bilge like that Indeed, that's "RUBBISH"Now you know how we feel with your posts crammed with smiileys and CAPS and colons etc.
hmmm...I know you are a sensitive soul, and suffer untold anguish at the mildest perceived insult,....
but could you please, explain to this simple soul how on earth that is "abuse"...as opposed to criticism???
Victorismyhero- INTERNAL SECURITY DIRECTOR
- Posts : 11441
Join date : 2015-11-06
Re: New rule on avatars -- made unilaterally by Ben
As you have deemed yourself a 'SIMPLE MINDED' soul and seem quite able to insult while supposedly doing a 'Moderator Job' ...one would only have to look at her wording and ask yourself - TO WHOM IS THE 'WE' she seems to always refer too when bashing my posts with her Grammar/Spell Checker Hammer?
And it's quite obvious that while she ignores all of YOUR numerous spelling errors {stormee/didge's/tommykins} her trolling my posts just to hammer down on her immature issues is = YES, INDEED ABUSE!
But you being the Lord Supreme of FOULNESS, would never stoop so low as to agree with my POV regarding that and that's exactly why I've stopped reporting anything to YOU!
And it's quite obvious that while she ignores all of YOUR numerous spelling errors {stormee/didge's/tommykins} her trolling my posts just to hammer down on her immature issues is = YES, INDEED ABUSE!
But you being the Lord Supreme of FOULNESS, would never stoop so low as to agree with my POV regarding that and that's exactly why I've stopped reporting anything to YOU!
Guest- Guest
Re: New rule on avatars -- made unilaterally by Ben
ahhh...i see
you DONT know the difference....
thats a relief...I thought it was just me.
see...I havnt seen her "bash you" for spelling/typos (which in any case is regarded as just plain dumb to do since we are not all skilled typists and some of us own dyslexic keyboards)
however your addiction to caps, bold, super size and emoticons, seemingly scattered at random and in great quantity does tend to render some of your offerings lets say a little less than cogent or indeed readable
they remind me of those irritating childrens books...you know the ones
Johnny had some , and one day whilst looking over the road he saw some bouncing. So he at the owner and the went and told his mummy who was so she had to listen to the judge who had lots of for her.
you DONT know the difference....
thats a relief...I thought it was just me.
see...I havnt seen her "bash you" for spelling/typos (which in any case is regarded as just plain dumb to do since we are not all skilled typists and some of us own dyslexic keyboards)
however your addiction to caps, bold, super size and emoticons, seemingly scattered at random and in great quantity does tend to render some of your offerings lets say a little less than cogent or indeed readable
they remind me of those irritating childrens books...you know the ones
Johnny had some , and one day whilst looking over the road he saw some bouncing. So he at the owner and the went and told his mummy who was so she had to listen to the judge who had lots of for her.
Victorismyhero- INTERNAL SECURITY DIRECTOR
- Posts : 11441
Join date : 2015-11-06
Re: New rule on avatars -- made unilaterally by Ben
Ahhhhh! It seems there is a posting style we are all supposed to conform to and humour isn't allowed. Wonder when that came in.
Guest- Guest
Re: New rule on avatars -- made unilaterally by Ben
And there we have it yet again; his holiness spewing his foul rhetoric about an issue that he allows and continues to allow and it just proves why HT & Raggy-dooer never follow any of your directives!Lord Foul wrote:ahhh...i see
you DONT know the difference....
thats a relief...I thought it was just me.
see...I havnt seen her "bash you" for spelling/typos (which in any case is regarded as just plain dumb to do since we are not all skilled typists and some of us own dyslexic keyboards)
however your addiction to caps, bold, super size and emoticons, seemingly scattered at random and in great quantity does tend to render some of your offerings lets say a little less than cogent or indeed readable
they remind me of those irritating childrens books...you know the ones
Johnny had some , and one day whilst looking over the road he saw some bouncing. So he at the owner and the went and told his mummy who was so she had to listen to the judge who had lots of for her.
Your word means NADA TO THEM and yet you will with your MIGHTY HAMMER bounce one of your NON-FAVORED members whenever it suits your FOUL MOOD!
Point proven as to why I never report any abuse any longer; your vile - mean method of insulting/ridicule and total un-moderation behavior is as low as shamefully has been afforded you! YOU SUCK and you enjoy your power and BULLYING MEMBERS AROUND!
Does that give you a HARD ON to be so cruel and vile ...you certainly excel at it!
Must be some pay back/reward built into that twisted behavior
Guest- Guest
Re: New rule on avatars -- made unilaterally by Ben
no...not at all....BUT....if you post in an outlandish style then reasonable criticism is fair/likely and NOT ABUSE.........
others have seen a fair share of criticism for "odd" ways of expressing themselves
my point is that criticism and abuse seem to be inextricably entwined in some peoples mind, and they fail to appreciate the difference hence any criticism THEY receive is abuse and any abuse they post is mere "criticism"
others have seen a fair share of criticism for "odd" ways of expressing themselves
my point is that criticism and abuse seem to be inextricably entwined in some peoples mind, and they fail to appreciate the difference hence any criticism THEY receive is abuse and any abuse they post is mere "criticism"
Victorismyhero- INTERNAL SECURITY DIRECTOR
- Posts : 11441
Join date : 2015-11-06
Re: New rule on avatars -- made unilaterally by Ben
see what I mean?
Victorismyhero- INTERNAL SECURITY DIRECTOR
- Posts : 11441
Join date : 2015-11-06
Re: New rule on avatars -- made unilaterally by Ben
Lord Foul wrote:no...not at all....BUT....if you post in an outlandish style then reasonable criticism is fair/likely and NOT ABUSE.........
others have seen a fair share of criticism for "odd" ways of expressing themselves
my point is that criticism and abuse seem to be inextricably entwined in some peoples mind, and they fail to appreciate the difference hence any criticism THEY receive is abuse and any abuse they post is mere "criticism"
Wow
Guest- Guest
Re: New rule on avatars -- made unilaterally by Ben
yes??
outlandish...
outlandish
aʊtˈlandɪʃ/
adjective
adjective: outlandish
1.
looking or sounding bizarre or unfamiliar.
"outlandish, brightly coloured clothes"
2.
archaic
foreign or alien.
"three wise, outlandish kings"
synonyms: weird, queer, offbeat, far out, freakish, grotesque, quirky, zany, eccentric, off-centre, idiosyncratic, unconventional, unorthodox, funny, bizarre, fantastic, unusual, extraordinary, strange, unfamiliar, unknown, unheard of, alien, foreign, peculiar, odd, curious;
outlandish...
outlandish
aʊtˈlandɪʃ/
adjective
adjective: outlandish
1.
looking or sounding bizarre or unfamiliar.
"outlandish, brightly coloured clothes"
2.
archaic
foreign or alien.
"three wise, outlandish kings"
synonyms: weird, queer, offbeat, far out, freakish, grotesque, quirky, zany, eccentric, off-centre, idiosyncratic, unconventional, unorthodox, funny, bizarre, fantastic, unusual, extraordinary, strange, unfamiliar, unknown, unheard of, alien, foreign, peculiar, odd, curious;
Victorismyhero- INTERNAL SECURITY DIRECTOR
- Posts : 11441
Join date : 2015-11-06
Re: New rule on avatars -- made unilaterally by Ben
just stop stirring sassy...
Victorismyhero- INTERNAL SECURITY DIRECTOR
- Posts : 11441
Join date : 2015-11-06
Re: New rule on avatars -- made unilaterally by Ben
Fuck off am I stirring. You are, by calling a particular style 'outlandish'. That's what you think and you are not here to make those kind of judgements, and saying it is outlandish is stirring with the biggest bloody spoon imaginable. FFS!
Guest- Guest
Re: New rule on avatars -- made unilaterally by Ben
I'll remind you of that next time you criticise someone elses "style"
Victorismyhero- INTERNAL SECURITY DIRECTOR
- Posts : 11441
Join date : 2015-11-06
Re: New rule on avatars -- made unilaterally by Ben
would it make you feel better if i said "wierd" or "odd" ...or "strange" or "way out"
see the def of "outlandish"
see the def of "outlandish"
Victorismyhero- INTERNAL SECURITY DIRECTOR
- Posts : 11441
Join date : 2015-11-06
Re: New rule on avatars -- made unilaterally by Ben
How about 'interesting' 'funny' 'not boring' 'individual' etc
Guest- Guest
Re: New rule on avatars -- made unilaterally by Ben
4EVER2 wrote:And there we have it yet again; his holiness spewing his foul rhetoric about an issue that he allows and continues to allow and it just proves why HT & Raggy-dooer never follow any of your directives!Lord Foul wrote:ahhh...i see
you DONT know the difference....
thats a relief...I thought it was just me.
see...I havnt seen her "bash you" for spelling/typos (which in any case is regarded as just plain dumb to do since we are not all skilled typists and some of us own dyslexic keyboards)
however your addiction to caps, bold, super size and emoticons, seemingly scattered at random and in great quantity does tend to render some of your offerings lets say a little less than cogent or indeed readable
they remind me of those irritating childrens books...you know the ones
Johnny had some , and one day whilst looking over the road he saw some bouncing. So he at the owner and the went and told his mummy who was so she had to listen to the judge who had lots of for her.
Your word means NADA TO THEM and yet you will with your MIGHTY HAMMER bounce one of your NON-FAVORED members whenever it suits your FOUL MOOD!
Point proven as to why I never report any abuse any longer; your vile - mean method of insulting/ridicule and total un-moderation behavior is as low as shamefully has been afforded you! YOU SUCK and you enjoy your power and BULLYING MEMBERS AROUND!
Does that give you a HARD ON to be so cruel and vile ...you certainly excel at it!
Must be some pay back/reward built into that twisted behavior
Don't speak for me, you tedious imbecile.
HoratioTarr- Forum Detective ????♀️
- Posts : 10037
Join date : 2014-01-12
Re: New rule on avatars -- made unilaterally by Ben
sassy wrote:How about 'interesting' 'funny' 'not boring' 'individual' etc
Infantile or sophomoric would be a far better placed to describe her style
Its like something out of a Teenagers style at school and the mentality.
Guest- Guest
Re: New rule on avatars -- made unilaterally by Ben
sassy wrote:How about 'interesting' 'funny' 'not boring' 'individual' etc
because, with perhaps the exception of the last...it isnt.....
but once again...in your haste to deflect from the point I'm making you go off an a tangent (which is hardly relevant)
the point being criticism of a posting style (as opposed to the typo/grammar nazi) IS NOT ABUSE, especially when that "style" is ...well....Odd
Oh dont get me wrong ...I FULLY understand the WHY.......
as a mask for giving out abuse under the cover of "humour" it is a great ruse, see the posts above to which i replied with "see what I mean". but its wearing a bit thin now...
Victorismyhero- INTERNAL SECURITY DIRECTOR
- Posts : 11441
Join date : 2015-11-06
Re: New rule on avatars -- made unilaterally by Ben
Ah well, if it's beyond you, it's beyond you.
Guest- Guest
Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
Similar topics
» New avatars for several users
» Smiles and avatars update
» Why are people's avatars suddenly so huge?
» A note about using other people's images in links and avatars
» Dear Ben: Avatars
» Smiles and avatars update
» Why are people's avatars suddenly so huge?
» A note about using other people's images in links and avatars
» Dear Ben: Avatars
Page 2 of 2
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Sat Mar 18, 2023 12:28 pm by Ben Reilly
» TOTAL MADNESS Great British Railway Journeys among shows flagged by counter terror scheme ‘for encouraging far-right sympathies
Wed Feb 22, 2023 5:14 pm by Tommy Monk
» Interesting COVID figures
Tue Feb 21, 2023 5:00 am by Tommy Monk
» HAPPY CHRISTMAS.
Sun Jan 01, 2023 7:33 pm by Tommy Monk
» The Fight Over Climate Change is Over (The Greenies Won!)
Thu Dec 15, 2022 3:59 pm by Tommy Monk
» Trump supporter murders wife, kills family dog, shoots daughter
Mon Dec 12, 2022 1:21 am by 'Wolfie
» Quill
Thu Oct 20, 2022 10:28 pm by Tommy Monk
» Algerian Woman under investigation for torture and murder of French girl, 12, whose body was found in plastic case in Paris
Thu Oct 20, 2022 10:04 pm by Tommy Monk
» Wind turbines cool down the Earth (edited with better video link)
Sun Oct 16, 2022 9:19 am by Ben Reilly
» Saying goodbye to our Queen.
Sun Sep 25, 2022 9:02 pm by Maddog
» PHEW.
Sat Sep 17, 2022 6:33 pm by Syl
» And here's some more enrichment...
Thu Sep 15, 2022 3:46 pm by Ben Reilly
» John F Kennedy Assassination
Thu Sep 15, 2022 3:40 pm by Ben Reilly
» Where is everyone lately...?
Thu Sep 15, 2022 3:33 pm by Ben Reilly
» London violence over the weekend...
Mon Sep 05, 2022 2:19 pm by Tommy Monk
» Why should anyone believe anything that Mo Farah says...!?
Wed Jul 13, 2022 1:44 am by Tommy Monk
» Liverpool Labour defends mayor role poll after turnout was only 3% and they say they will push ahead with the option that was least preferred!!!
Mon Jul 11, 2022 1:11 pm by Tommy Monk
» Labour leader Keir Stammer can't answer the simple question of whether a woman has a penis or not...
Mon Jul 11, 2022 3:58 am by Tommy Monk
» More evidence of remoaners still trying to overturn Brexit... and this is a conservative MP who should be drummed out of the party and out of parliament!
Sun Jul 10, 2022 10:50 pm by Tommy Monk
» R Kelly 30 years, Ghislaine Maxwell 20 years... but here in UK...
Fri Jul 08, 2022 5:31 pm by Original Quill