At Last A Forum With Free Speech- Newsfix Rocks.

[Major]

First topic message reminder :

The forums I have been on where you are banned for even thinking the things we freely discuss here.

We must be allowed to vent our views, even anger if we want to.

Sassy can even have her purely racist, hatred views of us Brits put into script.

Most forums say they have free speech but it is untrue when it comes to debating, queers, terrorists, Muslims lesbos and so on.

Newfix Rocks,





unless you know different.

[Raggamuffin]

Waste of time ...

[Guest]

Anway lets move on from rags hatred of the irish and get back to newsfix

[Raggamuffin]

Anway lets move on from rags hatred of the irish and get back to newsfix

So you start an argument and then you want to "move on". You're a disgusting hypocrite.

[Original Quill]

And everyone can ignore your little tantrums you just had here.
It works both ways, I will rightly say if something is wrong and Ben was wrong to call you a liar, but your views not to give a shit whilst claiming victim status only of the British was the worse hypocrisy going.
Its not about you needing my apporval, I will just happilly show up your double standards

You just made your rant look meaningless

You can say what you like, but talking about "tantrums" is a bit stupid coming from the forum flouncer of the year. You got over your lack of "respect" for Ben quick enough didn't you? No doubt you saw the chance to redeem yourself and suck up to him once again.

Raggs, be nice. There's no need to take out after didge, who's just being nice himself.

[Raggamuffin]

So now disapproving of the IRA is "hatred of the Irish". Sounds like you're also a terrorist supporter Didge. Is there nothing you won't stoop to in order to suck up to the person who runs this forum?

[Raggamuffin]

You can say what you like, but talking about "tantrums" is a bit stupid coming from the forum flouncer of the year. You got over your lack of "respect" for Ben quick enough didn't you? No doubt you saw the chance to redeem yourself and suck up to him once again.

Raggs, be nice.  There's no need to take out after didge, who's just being nice himself.

He's being disgusting.

[Guest]

Anway lets move on from rags hatred of the irish and get back to newsfix

So you start an argument and then you want to "move on". You're a disgusting hypocrite.

Its called speaking my mind, then moving on.
I have nothing personal against anyone here, why should I, but I will speak my mind then move on, which at times you are incapable of.
Like I say you act spoilt.

[Ben Reilly]

I stand by what I said about Ben, and if he can't back up this claim that I lie all the time about people on this forum, I'll continue to call him a liar.

All right, by "people" I meant "me." Happy? You lie about me. I don't support the IRA, never have. I don't support killing civilians in the name of a political aim or for any other reason. You keep falsely accusing me of supporting terrorism, though, and that's a horrible thing to do to another person.

And for good measure, since I can't remember whether I did this before:

I apologize to those I offended by posting that video. I did it in a moment of frustration, and it doesn't reflect how I really feel about England or its people.

[Raggamuffin]

So you start an argument and then you want to "move on". You're a disgusting hypocrite.

Its called speaking my mind, then moving on.
I have nothing personal against anyone here, why should I, but I will speak my mind then move on, which at times you are incapable of.
Like I say you act spoilt.

You're the one who waded in and started defending an IRA supporter. Now you seem to think that anyone who doesn't support the IRA hates the Irish. Do you admire the IRA as well Didge?

[Guest]

So now disapproving of the IRA is "hatred of the Irish". Sounds like you're also a terrorist supporter Didge. Is there nothing you won't stoop to in order to suck up to the person who runs this forum?

So two uncles murdered by the IRA and I have more than any to hate them, where you have never been effected by them like I have. At no point have you given a shit about how the irish suffered and make the most childish and immature view just onto how some British people suffered. That is appalling and showing the worst distain for the Irish themselves, when I asked you. You stated you did not give a shit.
So show anywhere that I support the IRA?
If not best you hang your head in shame.
If I am wrong on you hating the Irish, then all you have to do is prove me wrong and admit the Irish suffered appalling under the British, English etc?

[Guest]

Its called speaking my mind, then moving on.
I have nothing personal against anyone here, why should I, but I will speak my mind then move on, which at times you are incapable of.
Like I say you act spoilt.

You're the one who waded in and started defending an IRA supporter. Now you seem to think that anyone who doesn't support the IRA hates the Irish. Do you admire the IRA as well Didge?

Now here is a lie for all to see.
I stated that Ben is wrong about the conflict and that he wrongly understands the conflict and nobody agrees with you that he supports the IRA.
So you just lied about me and you lied about Ben, best you wash that mouth of yours out with soap.
So your poor attempts at goading when I just showed up your dounble standards are both coimical and shows your immaturity once again.

[Raggamuffin]

So now disapproving of the IRA is "hatred of the Irish". Sounds like you're also a terrorist supporter Didge. Is there nothing you won't stoop to in order to suck up to the person who runs this forum?

So two uncles murdered by the IRA and I have more than any to hate them, where you have never been effected by them like I have. At no point have you given a shit about how the irish suffered  and make the most childish and immature view just onto how some British people suffered. That is appalling and showing the worst distain for the Irish themselves, when I asked you. You stated you did not give a shit.
So show anywhere that I support the IRA?
If not best you hang your head in shame.
If I am wrong on you hating the Irish, then all you have to do is prove me wrong and admit the Irish suffered appalling under the British, English etc?

I didn't say I didn't give a shit. I'm sure that Ben will jump in to call you a liar for saying that. I said I didn't want to discuss the history of NI.

I don't need to prove anything to you. Go and pick a fight with someone else? What's the matter? Has Sassy gone off line?

[Raggamuffin]

You're the one who waded in and started defending an IRA supporter. Now you seem to think that anyone who doesn't support the IRA hates the Irish. Do you admire the IRA as well Didge?

Now here is a lie for all to see.
I stated that Ben is wrong about the conflict and that he wrongly understands the conflict and nobody agrees with you that he supports the IRA.
So you just lied about me and you lied about Ben, best you wash that mouth of yours out with soap.
So your poor attempts at goading when I just showed up your dounble standards are both coimical and shows your immaturity once again.

You're the one who just lied about me, stupid man.

[Ben Reilly]

So now disapproving of the IRA is "hatred of the Irish". Sounds like you're also a terrorist supporter Didge. Is there nothing you won't stoop to in order to suck up to the person who runs this forum?

So two uncles murdered by the IRA and I have more than any to hate them, where you have never been effected by them like I have. At no point have you given a shit about how the irish suffered  and make the most childish and immature view just onto how some British people suffered. That is appalling and showing the worst distain for the Irish themselves, when I asked you. You stated you did not give a shit.
So show anywhere that I support the IRA?
If not best you hang your head in shame.
If I am wrong on you hating the Irish, then all you have to do is prove me wrong and admit the Irish suffered appalling under the British, English etc?

I didn't say I didn't give a shit. I'm sure that Ben will jump in to call you a liar for saying that. I said I didn't want to discuss the history of NI.

I don't need to prove anything to you. Go and pick a fight with someone else? What's the matter? Has Sassy gone off line?

It does seem that you grant yourself a measure of liberty in interpreting others' words that you don't allow others to take with your own ...

[Guest]

So two uncles murdered by the IRA and I have more than any to hate them, where you have never been effected by them like I have. At no point have you given a shit about how the irish suffered  and make the most childish and immature view just onto how some British people suffered. That is appalling and showing the worst distain for the Irish themselves, when I asked you. You stated you did not give a shit.
So show anywhere that I support the IRA?
If not best you hang your head in shame.
If I am wrong on you hating the Irish, then all you have to do is prove me wrong and admit the Irish suffered appalling under the British, English etc?

I didn't say I didn't give a shit. I'm sure that Ben will jump in to call you a liar for saying that. I said I didn't want to discuss the history of NI.

I don't need to prove anything to you. Go and pick a fight with someone else? What's the matter? Has Sassy gone off line?

How absurd can you get. You cannot discuss as you were doing about the IRA without talking about the history of Ireland and Britain. that is just blatantly absurd.
So you offer no evidence for your faslified claim and you still cannot say that the British and English treated the Irish appalling.
What more evidence do I need, when someone does everything but admit the wrongs done?

[Raggamuffin]

I didn't say I didn't give a shit. I'm sure that Ben will jump in to call you a liar for saying that. I said I didn't want to discuss the history of NI.

I don't need to prove anything to you. Go and pick a fight with someone else? What's the matter? Has Sassy gone off line?

It does seem that you grant yourself a measure of liberty in interpreting others' words that you don't allow others to take with your own ...

So does Didge, and I don't see you saying anything to him.

You also haven't commented on Veya's posts - strange that.

[Raggamuffin]

Why Didge thinks this thread is about NI is a mystery. Perhaps he could start another thread about it.

[Guest]

It does seem that you grant yourself a measure of liberty in interpreting others' words that you don't allow others to take with your own ...

So does Didge, and I don't see you saying anything to him.

You also haven't commented on Veya's posts - strange that.


lol he ws making the point on me interpreting your words, based off you yourseld do so


Doh


Still no condemnation I see

[Guest]

Why Didge thinks this thread is about NI is a mystery. Perhaps he could start another thread about it.

Who are you speaking to?

Yourself lol?

[Raggamuffin]

I'm out of here. Can't stomach the bullshit at the moment.

[Guest]

I'm out of here. Can't stomach the bullshit at the moment.

Have a lovely evening and thanks for the debate and for failing to condemn the persecution of the Irish.

[Guest]

I stand by what I said about Ben, and if he can't back up this claim that I lie all the time about people on this forum, I'll continue to call him a liar.

All right, by "people" I meant "me." Happy? You lie about me. I don't support the IRA, never have. I don't support killing civilians in the name of a political aim or for any other reason. You keep falsely accusing me of supporting terrorism, though, and that's a horrible thing to do to another person.

And for good measure, since I can't remember whether I did this before:

I apologize to those I offended by posting that video. I did it in a moment of frustration, and it doesn't reflect how I really feel about England or its people.

We all do things in anger. It happens, its shows we are passionate about what is right and if I remeber there was some very appalling nasty shit said

[Ben Reilly]

I didn't say I didn't give a shit. I'm sure that Ben will jump in to call you a liar for saying that. I said I didn't want to discuss the history of NI.

I don't need to prove anything to you. Go and pick a fight with someone else? What's the matter? Has Sassy gone off line?

It does seem that you grant yourself a measure of liberty in interpreting others' words that you don't allow others to take with your own ...

So does Didge, and I don't see you saying anything to him.

You also haven't commented on Veya's posts - strange that.

OK -- Didge, just because Raggs clams up when discussion is turned to what the British did to the Irish does not necessarily mean she doesn't think the British did horrible crimes to the Irish. She just isn't interested in discussing them, for whatever reasons she has.

Veya's comment was purely hypothetical and was illustrating how some people behave as though there are two sets of standards, one for the west and one for Muslim nations. He wasn't saying Britain should be bombed.

[Guest]

So does Didge, and I don't see you saying anything to him.

You also haven't commented on Veya's posts - strange that.

OK -- Didge, just because Raggs clams up when discussion is turned to what the British did to the Irish does not necessarily mean she doesn't think the British did horrible crimes to the Irish. She just isn't interested in discussing them, for whatever reasons she has.

Veya's comment was purely hypothetical and was illustrating how some people behave as though there are two sets of standards, one for the west and one for Muslim nations. He wasn't saying Britain should be bombed.

You spoil my fun sir and it was showing up, as you well know how she was being absurd, to post the same reasoning.
Was I goading?
Absolutely, but she should learn that she took it too far with you and she knows it, hence her defensiveness.
I know very well Veya is not racist but at times his posts seem very hateful towards the British and I know he is joking to goad, but it can come across sometimes as very poor in taste.
However a couple of lefties are very racist on here and fail to see that they are.

[Ben Reilly]

So does Didge, and I don't see you saying anything to him.

You also haven't commented on Veya's posts - strange that.

OK -- Didge, just because Raggs clams up when discussion is turned to what the British did to the Irish does not necessarily mean she doesn't think the British did horrible crimes to the Irish. She just isn't interested in discussing them, for whatever reasons she has.

Veya's comment was purely hypothetical and was illustrating how some people behave as though there are two sets of standards, one for the west and one for Muslim nations. He wasn't saying Britain should be bombed.

You spoil my fun sir and it was showing up, as you well know how she was being absurd, to post the same reasoning.
Was I goading?
Absolutely, but she should learn that she took it too far with you and she knows it, hence her defensiveness.
I know very well Veya is not racist but at times his posts seem very hateful towards the British and I know he is joking to goad, but it can come across sometimes as very poor in taste.
However a couple of lefties are very racist on here and fail to see that they are.

[Major]

Someones gonna pay for nakkarin my thread.
Norty norty norty.

[Guest]

Someones gonna pay for nakkarin my thread.
Norty norty norty.

Say hello to my little friend..  

[Guest]

rubbish its you doing that using synonyms out of context  

A fine example of being bigoted

Not at all words have scale, depending on what word you use in a sentence and the context it is used in gives different meaning or interpretation and that is the foundation of language ,in the sense they are all synonyms of each other that much is true as i am sure you know synonym is a word or phrase that means exactly or nearly the same as another word or phrase in the same language.

the relevant bit of that is "nearly the same" Ie a scale
that scale depends on the implied intention of the use in its context

you said "Everyone is a bigot to their personal preferences"

you could have said everyone is a "slave" or bias`d or bound ect ect by there personal preferences and that would be very true
however bigot doesn`t even fit grammatically speaking its the wrong word in the wrong place

And i remember once when you considered me the "least bigoted person on hear " Ho hum

yes we all have "personal preferences" and sure if you want to use bigoted as a grammatical descriptor under the widest possible all encompassing net

Then sure you can hammer it in


BUT bigot to their personal preferences ?


Na Sorry dude wrong word ,wrong context just plain wrong

[Guest]

A fine example of being bigoted

Not at all words have scale, depending on what word you use in a sentence and the context it is used in gives different meaning or interpretation  and that is the foundation of language ,in the sense they are all synonyms of each other  that much is true as i am sure you know synonym is a word or phrase that means exactly or nearly the same as another word or phrase in the same language.

the relevant bit of that is "nearly the same" Ie a scale
that scale depends on the implied intention of the use in its context

you said "Everyone is a bigot to their personal preferences"

you could have said everyone is a "slave" or bias`d or bound ect ect by there personal preferences and that would be very true
however bigot doesn`t even fit grammatically speaking its the wrong word in the wrong place

And i remember once when you considered me the "least bigoted person on hear " Ho hum

yes we all have "personal preferences" and sure if you want to use bigoted as a grammatical descriptor under the widest possible all encompassing net

Then sure you can hammer it in


BUT bigot to their personal preferences ?


Na Sorry dude wrong word ,wrong context just plain wrong

Again you are inventing things I have never said.
I have been very specific onto views held by people which as seen the left seen to find it appaling they could be bigots. For example you hold bigoted views about a certain forum owner do you not?
Because you are intolerant of his views. Whether that is right or wrong is of no concern to me but you are intolerant of that person and his views. That is bigotry as it is the same with how he holds views of you.
What you fail to grasps is its okay to be intolerant of bad beliefs.
Like for example I am intolerant of those who execute homosexuals because of religious babble which I am sure you are the same? I am intolerant that think homosexuals should be executed because of religious beliefs.

The meaning of the word is very simple, you are either tolerant towards views made or implimented or intolerant.

There is no middle ground

[Guest]

You seem to be taking this personal Korben which it is not, what I am saying is that we all have some bigotry to certain things, where some people are just full of bigotry. Where people like me and you hold bigoted views are of intolerable things like those who believe that adulterers should be stonned to death. This is what you are failing to grasp and wrongly taking personal.
We all hold some bigoted views, but the views bigoted are generally justified based on the appaling views some have.

[Guest]

You seem to be taking this personal Korben which it is not, what I am saying is that we all have some bigotry to certain things, where some people are just full of bigotry. Where people like me and you hold bigoted views are of intolerable things like those who believe that adulterers should be stonned to death. This is what you are failing to grasp and wrongly taking personal.
We all hold some bigoted views, but the views bigoted are generally justified based on the appaling views some have.

EH!!! ??? what a really strange accusation to make

Pray tell ?
in what way have i in any way taken your mistake "personally"

[Raggamuffin]

OK -- Didge, just because Raggs clams up when discussion is turned to what the British did to the Irish does not necessarily mean she doesn't think the British did horrible crimes to the Irish. She just isn't interested in discussing them, for whatever reasons she has.

Veya's comment was purely hypothetical and was illustrating how some people behave as though there are two sets of standards, one for the west and one for Muslim nations. He wasn't saying Britain should be bombed.

You spoil my fun sir and it was showing up, as you well know how she was being absurd, to post the same reasoning.
Was I goading?
Absolutely, but she should learn that she took it too far with you and she knows it, hence her defensiveness.
I know very well Veya is not racist but at times his posts seem very hateful towards the British and I know he is joking to goad, but it can come across sometimes as very poor in taste.
However a couple of lefties are very racist on here and fail to see that they are.

What a sad life you have if you spend your days having "fun" goading people on forums. Still, I don't suppose you have anything better to do.

[Raggamuffin]

So does Didge, and I don't see you saying anything to him.

You also haven't commented on Veya's posts - strange that.

OK -- Didge, just because Raggs clams up when discussion is turned to what the British did to the Irish does not necessarily mean she doesn't think the British did horrible crimes to the Irish. She just isn't interested in discussing them, for whatever reasons she has.

Veya's comment was purely hypothetical and was illustrating how some people behave as though there are two sets of standards, one for the west and one for Muslim nations. He wasn't saying Britain should be bombed.

He said the EDL should be bombed. Of course you will defend that, what with your views being the way they are.

[Guest]

Not at all words have scale, depending on what word you use in a sentence and the context it is used in gives different meaning or interpretation  and that is the foundation of language ,in the sense they are all synonyms of each other  that much is true as i am sure you know synonym is a word or phrase that means exactly or nearly the same as another word or phrase in the same language.

the relevant bit of that is "nearly the same" Ie a scale
that scale depends on the implied intention of the use in its context

you said "Everyone is a bigot to their personal preferences"

you could have said everyone is a "slave" or bias`d or bound ect ect by there personal preferences and that would be very true
however bigot doesn`t even fit grammatically speaking its the wrong word in the wrong place

And i remember once when you considered me the "least bigoted person on hear " Ho hum

yes we all have "personal preferences" and sure if you want to use bigoted as a grammatical descriptor under the widest possible all encompassing net

Then sure you can hammer it in


BUT bigot to their personal preferences ?


Na Sorry dude wrong word ,wrong context just plain wrong

Again you are inventing things I have never said.
I have been very specific onto views held by people which as seen the left seen to find it appaling they could be bigots. For example you hold bigoted views about a certain forum owner do you not?
Because you are intolerant of his views. Whether that is right or wrong is of no concern to me but you are intolerant of that person and his views. That is bigotry as it is the same with how he holds views of you.
What you fail to grasps is its okay to be intolerant of bad beliefs.
Like for example I am intolerant of those who execute homosexuals because of religious babble which I am sure you are the same? I am intolerant that think homosexuals should be executed because of religious beliefs.

The meaning of the word is very simple, you are either tolerant towards views made or implimented or intolerant.

There is no middle ground

Not sure why you bring dean up especially when your whole premise is wrong anyway

now i cant speak for flappy but quite frankly i don`t like him one little bit ,he knows it ,i know it ,but fortunately the feeling is i am sure mutual and strangely i am never the one to bring him up

but i am not "bigoted" towards him thats just absurd use of the word

[Guest]

You seem to be taking this personal Korben which it is not, what I am saying is that we all have some bigotry to certain things, where some people are just full of bigotry. Where people like me and you hold bigoted views are of intolerable things like those who believe that adulterers should be stonned to death. This is what you are failing to grasp and wrongly taking personal.
We all hold some bigoted views, but the views bigoted are generally justified based on the appaling views some have.

EH!!! ??? what a really strange accusation to make

Pray tell ?
in what way  have i in any way taken your mistake "personally"  

Not sure you classify where you are taking personal when you write views like this?

And i remember once when you considered me the "least bigoted person on hear " Ho hum

That is taking personally, anyway its clear you fail to grasp the meaning of word  and this is just going to be one endless circle of denial on your part, which is tedious for me.
If you fail to grasp now, you are not going grasp ten pages later either.
Again there is no middle ground

[Guest]

You spoil my fun sir and it was showing up, as you well know how she was being absurd, to post the same reasoning.
Was I goading?
Absolutely, but she should learn that she took it too far with you and she knows it, hence her defensiveness.
I know very well Veya is not racist but at times his posts seem very hateful towards the British and I know he is joking to goad, but it can come across sometimes as very poor in taste.
However a couple of lefties are very racist on here and fail to see that they are.

What a sad life you have if you spend your days having "fun" goading people on forums. Still, I don't suppose you have anything better to do.

Lol, more double standards, where are you claiming you do not goad posters as you certainly did on here?
Please Rags, you just got another lesson from me and its not my fault you did not like it.
Learn to grow up


Right night all

[Guest]

EH!!! ??? what a really strange accusation to make

Pray tell ?
in what way  have i in any way taken your mistake "personally"  

Not sure you classify where you are taking personal when you write views like this?

And i remember once when you considered me the "least bigoted person on hear " Ho hum

That is taking personally, anyway its clear you fail to grasp the meaning of word  and this is just going to be one endless circle of denial on your part, which is tedious for me.
If you fail to grasp now, you are not going grasp ten pages later either.
Again there is no middle ground

WoW.... now i may have made a mistake you are/was didge ? correct
And in that case the quote is correct ,as i remember (and i could be wrong ) didge(presumably you) said that to raggs i think it was ,could be wrong

now reading the other posts seems your just up to mischief
So i think i will get of at this stop

[Ben Reilly]

So does Didge, and I don't see you saying anything to him.

You also haven't commented on Veya's posts - strange that.

OK -- Didge, just because Raggs clams up when discussion is turned to what the British did to the Irish does not necessarily mean she doesn't think the British did horrible crimes to the Irish. She just isn't interested in discussing them, for whatever reasons she has.

Veya's comment was purely hypothetical and was illustrating how some people behave as though there are two sets of standards, one for the west and one for Muslim nations. He wasn't saying Britain should be bombed.

He said the EDL should be bombed. Of course you will defend that, what with your views being the way they are.

Link? Again -- I don't trust you.

[Raggamuffin]

He said the EDL should be bombed. Of course you will defend that, what with your views being the way they are.

Link? Again -- I don't trust you.

I posted the link when you asked before.

[veya_victaous]

So does Didge, and I don't see you saying anything to him.

You also haven't commented on Veya's posts - strange that.

OK -- Didge, just because Raggs clams up when discussion is turned to what the British did to the Irish does not necessarily mean she doesn't think the British did horrible crimes to the Irish. She just isn't interested in discussing them, for whatever reasons she has.

Veya's comment was purely hypothetical and was illustrating how some people behave as though there are two sets of standards, one for the west and one for Muslim nations. He wasn't saying Britain should be bombed.

He said the EDL should be bombed. Of course you will defend that, what with your views being the way they are.

Link? Again -- I don't trust you.

EDL should be treated like a terrorist organization, IF people where honest they would see EDL is behaving exactly like the Nazis pre world war 2.
And it's stated aims are the same as ISIS except British values instead of Islamic ones

OR it was to Raggs saying that this is an international news forum so in theory saying to Bomb any nation is of equal validity, the calls to Bomb Syria or Bomb the UK are equally up for debate... And of Course we are suggesting official govt Sanctioned bombings not terrorist bombs.

You Know FREE SPEECH and All
I think these Brits just aren't used to it

[Major]

WE NEED THE EDL AND ANY BRIT ORGANISATION WITH THEIR GUTS TO SPEAK THE TRUTH.

[Raggamuffin]

Link? Again -- I don't trust you.

EDL should be treated like a terrorist organization, IF people where honest they would see EDL is behaving exactly like the Nazis pre world war 2.
And it's stated aims are the same as ISIS except British values instead of Islamic ones

OR it was to Raggs saying that this is an international news forum so in theory saying to Bomb any nation is of equal validity, the calls to Bomb Syria or Bomb the UK are equally up for debate... And of Course we are suggesting official govt Sanctioned bombings not terrorist bombs.

You Know FREE SPEECH and All
I think these Brits just aren't used to it

You want to kill British citizens. You should be banned from ever entering this country.

[Major]

EDL and Nazis bear no relationship to each other, that is just emotional propaganda claptrap I have heard on forums for years.

This island has a mega prob, we must solve it and win no matter how.

[veya_victaous]

Link? Again -- I don't trust you.

EDL should be treated like a terrorist organization, IF people where honest they would see EDL is behaving exactly like the Nazis pre world war 2.
And it's stated aims are the same as ISIS except British values instead of Islamic ones

OR it was to Raggs saying that this is an international news forum so in theory saying to Bomb any nation is of equal validity, the calls to Bomb Syria or Bomb the UK are equally up for debate... And of Course we are suggesting official govt Sanctioned bombings not terrorist bombs.

You Know FREE SPEECH and All
I think these Brits just aren't used to it

You want to kill British citizens. You should be banned from ever entering this country.

Are you drunk or stupid

You want to Kill British citizens YOU should be banned from the country
Or Do you want to Serve the terrorists Tea instead 
British Citizens are Members of ISIS

AND 'British Citizen' is not some magic that makes it any differnet to suggest Lawful death for.

And Don't worry I wouldn't want to go to such a shitty place I never had much interest but none after seeing how ridiculous you lot are.

[Raggamuffin]

You want to kill British citizens. You should be banned from ever entering this country.

Are you drunk or stupid

You want to Kill British citizens YOU should be banned from the country
Or Do you want to Serve the terrorists Tea instead 
British Citizens are Members of ISIS

AND 'British Citizen' is not some magic that makes it any differnet to suggest Lawful death for.

And Don't worry I wouldn't want to go to such a shitty place I never had much interest but none after seeing how ridiculous you lot are.

Well that's good because your anti-British views have become incitement to murder now. You want members of the EDL to be bombed, and they're mostly English, so you're actually wishing harm on English citizens.

[Major]

No doubt Miss Ragga, you know you are being trolled.

[Raggamuffin]

No doubt Miss Ragga, you know you are being trolled.

Trolled by the virtuous left? Surely not.

[Victorismyhero]

the left HAS no virtue....save that it claims for itself

[veya_victaous]

EDL and Nazis bear no relationship to each other, that is just emotional propaganda claptrap I have heard on forums for years.

This island has a mega prob, we must solve it and win no matter how.

Agreed it has a major Problem in that it has so many Primitives that allow the Nazi Like to thrive.

EDL and Nazi Are Identical in the nationalistic propaganda the sort of rubbish you type.
the Solution is to be very harsh with people like you and EDL as you posses very little value to a modern society.
To teach the Muslims to get rid of their primitive beliefs we must make an example by ruthless expelling the primitive beliefs from our own societies and the very base Primitive tribal mindset like your is the perfect thing to use as an example as we know it only creates problems for society and you actively work against global cooperation and collaboration.

the last line you typed shows how you antiquated your ideas are, 'Nazi' is not quite right since they were current to their era but people like you are 'primitive' the world has already moved past your issues decades ago.... your island is just the backwater of the western empire so you get the changes decades after the rest. when your 'Mega prob' is something that other nations have already dealt with on a larger scale in the past 2 decades it just shows that you are obsolete.

[Raggamuffin]

the left HAS no virtue....save that it claims for itself

I really think that lefties are more bigoted and prejudiced than anyone, despite their claim that they're "tolerant".

[Sponsored content]