UKIP councillor insists 'lots' of people believe gays will cause the apocalypse

“There’s an awful lot of people out there who genuinely believe what Tyson said, because they are fundamental Christians. I respect them for that.

Lord Foul wrote:ah yes the veay school of politics


say it how yoiu see it.....but only if he sees it that way too

I say let the berks speak out, their own stupidity will ensure their demise...

I totally agree with

"We think society would be much healthier if people didn’t quietly close the door and speak amongst friends what their true opinions were – we’d rather they said them, so people could be judged on them.”

veya_victaous wrote:

“There’s an awful lot of people out there who genuinely believe what Tyson said, because they are fundamental Christians. I respect them for that.

may as well say he respects fucking ISIS
Told you these guys are terrorists, they just too cowardly to act.. they are literally saying that, he respects the unfounded prejudice they have because of an old fairy tale they still believe in..
well ISIS is that fairy tale put into practice.

veya_victaous wrote:And that is why we are currently the top of the food chain

Raggamuffin wrote:

veya_victaous wrote:

“There’s an awful lot of people out there who genuinely believe what Tyson said, because they are fundamental Christians. I respect them for that.

may as well say he respects fucking ISIS
Told you these guys are terrorists, they just too cowardly to act.. they are literally saying that, he respects the unfounded prejudice they have because of an old fairy tale they still believe in..
well ISIS is that fairy tale put into practice.

Don't be silly - they're not terrorists.

veya_victaous wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

Don't be silly - they're not terrorists.

Only because they just too cowardly to act..

They are saying they Fundamentally believe that gay people, Pagans etc should be killed. He respects that opinion. their god commands them to kill and he respects that

the guys is not different than a Saudi Politician trying to Justify ISIS's opinion.

'fundamental ANY religion' is the enemy of Secularism, by the very definition they cannot co-exist..

Lord Foul wrote:

veya_victaous wrote:And that is why we are currently the top of the food chain

you think.....

Raggamuffin wrote:

veya_victaous wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

Don't be silly - they're not terrorists.

Only because they just too cowardly to act..

They are saying they Fundamentally believe that gay people, Pagans etc should be killed. He respects that opinion. their god commands them to kill and he respects that

the guys is not different than a Saudi Politician trying to Justify ISIS's opinion.

'fundamental ANY religion' is the enemy of Secularism, by the very definition they cannot co-exist..

You could accuse anyone of being a terrorist who is too cowardly to act. It's interesting that you think terrorism is an act of bravery.

veya_victaous wrote:

Lord Foul wrote:
you think.....

you think it wasn't the Crazy ones that decide to try and kill Sabre tooths with pointy sticks

Tommy Monk wrote:He is entitled to his own opinions.

Tommy Monk wrote:Bullshit

Tommy Monk wrote:Tyson fury is entitled to his own personal opinions.

Hate speech is public expressions which spread, incite, promote or justify hatred, discrimination or hostility towards a specific group

veya_victaous wrote:http://www.ilga-europe.org/what-we-do/our-advocacy-work/hate-crime-hate-speech

Hate speech is public expressions which spread, incite, promote or justify hatred, discrimination or hostility towards a specific group

Try Again Vic, No it is not, it is Illegal to express Opinions that Justify the Illogical Hatred of Homosexuals.

AN advocacy group????.....methinks they are "stretching interpretation" a little there


the LAW



A person who uses threatening, abusive or insulting words or behaviour, or displays any written material which is threatening, abusive or insulting, is guilty of an offence if—

(a) he intends thereby to stir up racial hatred, or

(b) having regard to all the circumstances racial hatred is likely to be stirred up thereby.

Offences under Part 3 carry a maximum sentence of seven years imprisonment or a fine or both.[6]

The Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 inserted Section 4A into the Public Order Act 1986. That part prohibits anyone from causing alarm or distress. Section 4A states:

(1) A person is guilty of an offence if, with intent to cause a person harassment, alarm or distress, he— (a) uses threatening, abusive or insulting words or behaviour, or disorderly behaviour, or (b) displays any writing, sign or other visible representation which is threatening, abusive or insulting, thereby causing that or another person harassment, alarm or distress.

A person guilty of an offence under this section is liable on summary conviction to imprisonment for a term not exceeding six months or to a fine not exceeding level 5 on the standard scale or to both.[7]

The Racial and Religious Hatred Act 2006 amended the Public Order Act 1986 by adding Part 3A. That Part says, "A person who uses threatening words or behaviour, or displays any written material which is threatening, is guilty of an offence if he intends thereby to stir up religious hatred." The Part protects freedom of expression by stating in Section 29J:

Nothing in this Part shall be read or given effect in a way which prohibits or restricts discussion, criticism or expressions of antipathy, dislike, ridicule, insult or abuse of particular religions or the beliefs or practices of their adherents, or of any other belief system or the beliefs or practices of its adherents, or proselytising or urging adherents of a different religion or belief system to cease practising their religion or belief system.

The Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008 amended Part 3A of the Public Order Act 1986. The amended Part 3A adds, for England and Wales, the offence of inciting hatred on the ground of sexual orientation. All the offences in Part 3 attach to the following acts: the use of words or behaviour or display of written material, publishing or distributing written material, the public performance of a play, distributing, showing or playing a recording, broadcasting or including a programme in a programme service, and possession of inflammatory material. In the circumstances of hatred based on religious belief or on sexual orientation, the relevant act (namely, words, behaviour, written material, or recordings, or programme) must be threatening and not just abusive or insulting.[8]


And..
He very Carefully tries to suggest that they Are some peoples opinion that they are not necessarily his but he respects them???
what sort of disingenuous sort of crap is that, is a Muslim preacher Preached an anti Homosexual Rant with the preface,
 “There’s an awful lot of people out there who genuinely believe what Michael Adebolajo said, because they are fundamental Muslim. I respect them for that."
You'd be calling for them to be Hung

Tommy Monk wrote:Fury is entitled to his opinions, and then if he is asked to give his opinions, he is entitled to do so...