KKK raising money to 'reward' officer who killed Michael Brown

First topic message reminder :

The Ku Klux Klan is soliciting funds for the police officer in Ferguson, Missouri who shot and killed unarmed teenager Michael Brown, 18.

The Southern Poverty Law Center’s Hate Watch blog reported that the South Carolina-based New Empire Knights of the Ku Klux Klan boasted that its Missouri chapter is raising money as a “reward” for the officer.

“We are setting up a reward/fund for the police officer who shot this thug,” said an email from the Klan group. “He is a hero! We need more white cops who are anti-Zog and willing to put Jewish controlled black thugs in their place. Most cops are cowards and do nothing while 90 percent of interracial crime is black (and non-white) on white.”

An Arizona Klan chapter wrote on its blog, “We know that Michael Brown was nothing more than a punk. The media and others are painting him out to be a ‘good son’ and ‘great kid.’ The blacks of Missouri are showing their love of him by rioting, attacking and shooting people. Nothing new.”

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/08/14/kkk-raising-money-for-hero-ferguson-cop-who-shot-jewish-controlled-black-thug/

Communism was very left wing And responsible for many millions of deaths and brutality, so to say that Nazism wasn't left wing ONLY because it was responsible for millions of deaths and brutality is somewhat bizarre.....

Nothing to say about this still quill...???







The article quill posted is completely misleading and clearly twisting the figures.




And whites are not mostly the victims because they are the majority, as a majority with all crime levels being the same, you would expect to see whites carrying out more of the interracial crime against others.


I'll explain using rough figures just to prove the point.



Whites make up about 70%, blacks about 13%, and other non white, make up the rest about 17%.

Out of about 300 million people.


Let's say for arguments sake that all people are the same and crime rates are much similar as you lefties like to portray, blacks are not responsible for more crime etc.


And let's say for convenience that 0.1% of total population are involved in carrying out interracial crime.


Then whites would make up about 210million and would have carried out 210,000 interracial crimes.


Blacks would make up about 39 million and would have carried out about 39,000 interracial crimes.


And other non whites would make up about 51 million and would have carried out about 51,000 interracial crimes.


Totals show that Whites would have Carried out 210,000 crimes against blacks And other non whites while the total for blacks And non whites against others is only 90,000.

Whites responsible for about two thirds of all interracial crimes with two thirds of victims being blacks And other non whites, And therefore whites would be the victims in about a third.


But then when we remember that out of that 90,000 committed by blacks And other non whites, many of those would be between blacks And other non whites themselves so the total against whites from these groups would be much lower than 90,000.

So whites would be the victim in much less than a third of interracial crimes.


So for whites to be the victims in interracial crimes in 90% of them shows one of two things.

Either whites are hardly committing any interracial crimes at all.

Or blacks And other non whites are carrying out massively disproportionate levels of crimes against whites.



Simple maths and logic.





Whites are victims in 90% of interracial crimes.


We know who the real racists are!!!!

Still avoiding this quill.....!!!???

Tommy Monk wrote:Communism was very left wing And responsible for many millions of deaths and brutality, so to say that Nazism wasn't left wing ONLY because it was responsible for millions of deaths and brutality is somewhat bizarre.....

I've been gone tommy.

Communism is LW?  Haha...WTF do you know about communism?  I think I had this conversation with smels.

Let's go to school:

1.  Define communism.  What are it's principal tenets?  How does it differ from socialism?

2.  Who was Karl Marx?  What did he have to say about communism?  How does Marxism differ from communism? Describe the changes that Marx underwent between his 1834 Manuscript and his three volume Das Kapigal.

3.  Who is John Locke?  What was the significance of 'labor" to Locke?

4.  Essay question: How is Locke's theory of property (Second Treatise; chapt. V) different from Marx's theory of labor in Das Kapital?  Explain, giving workable examples.

Nothing to say about this still quill...???
The article quill posted is completely misleading and clearly twisting the figures.
And whites are not mostly the victims because they are the majority, as a majority with all crime levels being the same, you would expect to see whites carrying out more of the interracial crime against others.
I'll explain using rough figures just to prove the point.
Whites make up about 70%, blacks about 13%, and other non white, make up the rest about 17%.
Out of about 300 million people.
Let's say for arguments sake that all people are the same and crime rates are much similar as you lefties like to portray, blacks are not responsible for more crime etc.
And let's say for convenience that 0.1% of total population are involved in carrying out interracial crime.
Then whites would make up about 210million and would have carried out 210,000 interracial crimes.
Blacks would make up about 39 million and would have carried out about 39,000 interracial crimes.
And other non whites would make up about 51 million and would have carried out about 51,000 interracial crimes.
Totals show that Whites would have Carried out 210,000 crimes against blacks And other non whites while the total for blacks And non whites against others is only 90,000.
Whites responsible for about two thirds of all interracial crimes with two thirds of victims being blacks And other non whites, And therefore whites would be the victims in about a third.
But then when we remember that out of that 90,000 committed by blacks And other non whites, many of those would be between blacks And other non whites themselves so the total against whites from these groups would be much lower than 90,000.
So whites would be the victim in much less than a third of interracial crimes.
So for whites to be the victims in interracial crimes in 90% of them shows one of two things.
Either whites are hardly committing any interracial crimes at all.
Or blacks And other non whites are carrying out massively disproportionate levels of crimes against whites.
Simple maths and logic.
Whites are victims in 90% of interracial crimes.
We know who the real racists are!!!!
Let's stay on thread topic eh...?

Tommy Monk wrote:Communism was very left wing And responsible for many millions of deaths and brutality, so to say that Nazism wasn't left wing ONLY because it was responsible for millions of deaths and brutality is somewhat bizarre.....

I thought this was your post. Now answer the questions, Tommy.

Why don't you stick on topic and answer mine from way before as a direct response to your big long pseudo science bullshit posting on last page...????



And your claim that whites were the victims more because they were in the majority!!!!

Tommy Monk wrote:Communism was very left wing And responsible for many millions of deaths and brutality, so to say that Nazism wasn't left wing ONLY because it was responsible for millions of deaths and brutality is somewhat bizarre.....

Communism was very left wing ... as an idea. When put into practice, it was usually totalitarian, something most on the right- and left-wings distance themselves from.

But you're like a pitbull on a pant-leg here ... can't possibly let us socialists be anything different from Jew-exterminators, eh?

I think you'll find that it Is usually the lefties who cannot let the RW be anything other than racist Nazi knuckle dragging mass murderers.....






But anyway.... still waiting for quill to address my reply to his big post of pseudo science bullshit...???

Original Quill wrote:

Tommy Monk wrote:See the levies are still ignoring this important fact.....
"...90 percent of interracial crime is black (and non-white) on white...."
We know who the real racists are.....

The following facts mitigate your stellar finding, Tommy:

Tim Wise wrote:Even though there are more black-on-white interracial crimes than white-on-black interracial crimes, this fact is not evidence of anti-white racial targeting by black offenders. Rather, it is completely explained by two factors having nothing to do with anti-white bias: namely, the general differences in rates of criminal offending, and the rates at which whites and blacks encounter one another (and thus, have the opportunity to victimize one another). Once these two factors are “controlled for” in social science terms, the actual rates of black-on-white crime are lower than random chance would predict;

Indeed, Mr. Wise finds:

Tim Wise wrote:* No more than 0.7 percent (seven-tenths of one percent) of African Americans will commit a violent crime against a white person in a given year, and fewer than 0.3 (three-tenths of one percent) of whites will be victimized by a black person in a given year;
* Whites are 6 times as likely to be murdered by another white person as by a black person; and overall, the percentage of white Americans who will be murdered by a black offender in a given year is only 2/10,000ths of 1 percent (0.0002). This means that only 1 in every 500,000 white people will be murdered by a black person in a given year. Although the numbers of black-on-white homicides are higher than the reverse (447 to 218 in 2010), the 218 black victims of white murderers is actually a higher percentage of the black population interracially killed than the 447 white victims of black murderers as a percentage of the white population. In fact, any given black person is 2.75 times as likely to be murdered by a white person as any given white person is to be murdered by an African American.

Nothing to say about this still quill...???







The article quill posted is completely misleading and clearly twisting the figures.




And whites are not mostly the victims because they are the majority, as a majority with all crime levels being the same, you would expect to see whites carrying out more of the interracial crime against others.


I'll explain using rough figures just to prove the point.



Whites make up about 70%, blacks about 13%, and other non white, make up the rest about 17%.

Out of about 300 million people.


Let's say for arguments sake that all people are the same and crime rates are much similar as you lefties like to portray, blacks are not responsible for more crime etc.


And let's say for convenience that 0.1% of total population are involved in carrying out interracial crime.


Then whites would make up about 210million and would have carried out 210,000 interracial crimes.


Blacks would make up about 39 million and would have carried out about 39,000 interracial crimes.


And other non whites would make up about 51 million and would have carried out about 51,000 interracial crimes.


Totals show that Whites would have Carried out 210,000 crimes against blacks And other non whites while the total for blacks And non whites against others is only 90,000.

Whites responsible for about two thirds of all interracial crimes with two thirds of victims being blacks And other non whites, And therefore whites would be the victims in about a third.


But then when we remember that out of that 90,000 committed by blacks And other non whites, many of those would be between blacks And other non whites themselves so the total against whites from these groups would be much lower than 90,000.

So whites would be the victim in much less than a third of interracial crimes.


So for whites to be the victims in interracial crimes in 90% of them shows one of two things.

Either whites are hardly committing any interracial crimes at all.

Or blacks And other non whites are carrying out massively disproportionate levels of crimes against whites.



Simple maths and logic.





Whites are victims in 90% of interracial crimes.


We know who the real racists are!!!!

Ben_Reilly wrote:

Tommy Monk wrote:Communism was very left wing And responsible for many millions of deaths and brutality, so to say that Nazism wasn't left wing ONLY because it was responsible for millions of deaths and brutality is somewhat bizarre.....

Communism was very left wing ... as an idea. When put into practice, it was usually totalitarian, something most on the right- and left-wings distance themselves from.

But you're like a pitbull on a pant-leg here ... can't possibly let us socialists be anything different from Jew-exterminators, eh?

The only time communism came into the picture was in the 1848 publication my Marx and the British Fredrich Engels, The Communist Manifesto. When Marx returned to writing, he wrote only economic analysis. His work was compiled in Das Kapital.

@Tommy...I only have so much time...for you, or anyone else. I responded to your faux statistical argument, with two posts which were thorough, indeed. You have said nothing in your response, except to say it didn't respond...or some such nonsense. To merely stamp your foot and say NO!, is tantamount to not answering at all.

Then you come back with some post on communism. You didn't even take the test on that one. How much time do you think you are entitled to with your inadequate nonsense? If you are not willing to engage in serious dialogue, I do have law offices in three cities to tend to.

Not at all, I have showed quite clearly why whites should be responsible for overwhelming majority of interracial crimes, not the victim in 90% of them.

This shows that they are massively disproportionately attacked by blacks And other non whites.


And not only silence from the left but also attempts to deny it with completely twisted pseudo science bullshit.



Also are you saying that communism isn't left wing?



Or that all examples of communism we have seen in action weren't proper communism?




Which would be strange because many of our UK labour party members have been card carrying communist members too over the years..... so they obviously thought it was left wing, and it shows what their ambitions are for the country.

Tommy Monk wrote:Not at all, I have showed quite clearly why whites should be responsible for overwhelming majority of interracial crimes, not the victim in 90% of them.

This shows that they are massively disproportionately attacked by blacks And other non whites.

And not only silence from the left but also attempts to deny it with completely twisted pseudo science  bullshit.

Also are you saying that communism isn't left wing?

Or that all examples of communism we have seen in action weren't proper communism?

Which would be strange because many of our UK labour party members have been card carrying communist members too over the years..... so they obviously thought it was left wing, and it shows what their ambitions are for the country.

What do you mean by left-wing, Tommy? Define your terms,

Wiki wrote:The terms "left" and "right" appeared during the French Revolution of 1789 when members of the National Assembly divided into supporters of the king to the president's right and supporters of the revolution to his left. One deputy, the Baron de Gauville explained, "We began to recognize each other: those who were loyal to religion and the king took up positions to the right of the chair so as to avoid the shouts, oaths, and indecencies that enjoyed free rein in the opposing camp." However the Right opposed the seating arrangement because they believed that deputies should support private or general interests but should not form factions or political parties. The contemporary press occasionally used the terms "left" and "right" to refer to the opposing sides.

Communism is an organization of government. It has no personality. It has no morality. It has no anthropomorphic qualities at all. It is what it is.

On the other hand, people do have positions on political ideology. Proponents of communism have some core principles that motivate them...as do opponents. Define your terms and we'll discuss it.

Still waiting for You to reply to my earlier post about whites being the victims of 90% of interracial crime....



You posted a load of misleading waffle dressed up as science, you claimed that whites were the victims more because they are a majority and I clearly showed this all to be bollocks.



And that The only conclusion is that blacks And other non whites commit hugely disproportionate levels of crime against Whites.



And this shows who the real racists are.

Tommy Monk wrote:Still waiting for You to reply to my earlier post about whites being the victims of 90% of interracial crime....

I've answered that ages ago, with my two posts.

Tommy Monk wrote:You posted a load of misleading waffle dressed up as science, you claimed that whites were the victims more because they are a majority and I clearly showed this all to be bollocks.

It's bollocks (to you) because you don't understand it. Face it, Tommy...you have heard someone tout that one statistical item, and you now think it is the gold standard. But you only believe that because it sounds really complex, and you don't understand a word of it...hence, you are impressed. I have done my best to disabuse you of your error, but you don't want to be disabused.

Tommy Monk wrote:And that The only conclusion is that blacks And other non whites commit hugely disproportionate levels of crime against Whites.

And this shows who the real racists are.

You want to cling to your pseudo factoid in an effort to appear to be winning. It's not about winning, Tommy...it's about being right.

Now do you understand why it's a waste of my time? It's a waste of yours, too, but you don't know it. Everybody else knows it, but it eludes you.

Cheers.

I showed how wrong you were with simple maths and logic.


You don't like it so now resort to patronising rudeness.



Blacks commit vastly much more crime than any other group, and disproportionately target whites for attack.


13% of the population don't get to account for nearly half of all prison places by accident you know...!?


We know who the real racists are but lefties like you are bending over backwards to avoid seeing the truth that is so clearly staring them in the face.


And are too busy telling us white people how racist we all are.



The picture is much the same here in UK and our lefties are just the same in their denials and avoidance so no real surprise!

Tommy Monk wrote:I showed how wrong you were with simple maths and logic.

You don't like it so now resort to patronising rudeness.

Blacks commit vastly much more crime than any other group, and disproportionately target whites for attack.

13% of the population don't get to account for nearly half of all prison places by accident you know...!?

We know who the real racists are but lefties like you are bending over backwards to avoid seeing the truth that is so clearly staring them in the face.

And are too busy telling us white people how racist we all are.

The picture is much the same here in UK and our lefties are just the same in their denials and avoidance so no real surprise!

It's not rudeness, Tommy. It's impatience.

You refuse to have any sort of dialogue. Rather, you want to deal in edict and jingoism...a habit that conservatives often engage in, because they think their world is perfect...thus, why have any conversation?

Thus, I go walkabout on you...as I'm about to do right now.

I've been asking you to reply to my post on showing simple calculation which proves that whites are not mostly the victims because they are majority for ages now.


You are desperately avoiding the obvious truth and is clear for all to see.




Found this....

Over 2,000 Whites are murdered by non-Whites every year & most all of those cases recieve NO media coverage. The same for the several thousand Whites that are violently attacked every day by non-Whites. The same for the over 30,000 Whites that are raped every year by Blacks alone (only 10 per year the reverse).

 The cases in the video are from the small percentage of cases where there is minor local media coverage. Most serial killers are NOT White yet we keep hearing the media lies to the contrary.  The most prolific serial killer in the US is Black. No Black serial killer  ever has received ANY national media attention though White ones do.

Serial / Spree Killers
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLA52FD44E69F5C997
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLBF2D34628240104B
Check the links in the description box for the video to see FBI crime stats.
 
The rare White on non-White violent crimes often receives MASSIVE national media coverage. The media & academia put out anti-White propaganda (including the crime propaganda) and slant the info so that people think interracial crime is mainly perpetrated by Whites though the opposite is the case. In most all areas involving race the media & academia put forth inaccurate information designed to fan the flames of hatred non-Whites have for Whites, incite violence against Whites, and to create more perverse White guilt.     . 




A study by the New Century Foundation finds that of the 1.7 million interracial crimes that take place in the US every year, 90% are committed by blacks against whites. Blacks are 50 times more likely to commit single offender crimes against whites than the reverse. In group crime or multiple offender crimes blacks are as much as 200 times more likely to commit crimes against whites than the reverse.

The same study also shows that there is slightly more black on white crime than there is black on black crime. As for violent crimes, blacks commit at a rate of 4 to 8 times more than whites. Blacks are twice as likely to commit hate crimes as whites.

Every year massive numbers of black on white crimes go unreported by the National media and these (in the video above) are only a small few. This video is posted to enlighten & or educate people

These people are victims. Not only are they victims of brutal crimes but also victims of America's criminal media. The media ignore these type of crimes (White victims - non-White perpetrators ) to focus on crimes that involve non-White victims & White perpetrators. That is done in order to fan the flames of hatred towards Whites & incite more violence against Whites, while creating more perverse unwarranted White guilt.

To do this the media will go so far as to doctor video, 911 calls, withhold key info, outright lie & even present an obviously non-White Mestizo as a White person such as the media did in the Trayvon Martin case. That media story alone led to numerous revenge attacks against White people that the media is directly responsible for.

On a regular ongoing basis the media promote propaganda (via news stories, movies, books, documentaries. Rap music) designed to incite hatred for & violence against Whites. Government at all levels (especially schools) assist in creating hatred for Whites & inciting violence against Whites while disarming Whites with "White guilt".

Every 15 minutes (USA ) a "black" man rapes a "White". Over 30,000 times per year. Less than 10 the other way. 3,000 White people are violently attacked every day by Black people. Six White people are killed every day by Blacks. Been going on for 50+ years since the fear of hanging for such crimes ended.

Then there are all of the numerous black serial killers, spree killers & school shootings that receive NO national media coverage. We can all name White serial killers but can you name a black one? There are many. See my video "SERIAL KILLERS". Have you ever heard of the "Yahweh Ben Yahweh cult" murders of Whites?" What about the "ZEBRA MURDERS" of Whites?

Then there are the hundreds of thousands of violent attacks against White people committed by other races - especially Mestizos, many of which are here illegally. Many more people in America have been killed by illegal aliens since 9/11 than were killed on 9/11. Yet the borders are not secured by the Government. See my video "Crime Victims Of Illegal Aliens/immigrants"

No serious efforts have been made to enforce our immigration laws. Couldn't terrorists easily enter through the Southern border? Homeland Security is a sick joke without secure borders here at HOME. Yet our military is securing the borders of Afghanistan & before that Iraq.







No protests about this I see.....



The silence is deafening......

Tommy Monk wrote:The silence is deafening......

And quite intentional. Lol.

Lefties discussing high black crime rates and why whites are the victims of 90% of interracial crimes....

Original Quill wrote:

Tommy Monk wrote:The silence is deafening......

And quite intentional. Lol.

And You accuse me of refusing to have dialogue...!?


Plus the edict is all yours with your posting of the Tim Wise babble.


Not sure how anything I've said here is related to jingoism.... this is more an American trait....




Jingoism - the feelings and beliefs of people who think that their country is always right and who are in favor of aggressive acts against other countries .





I've replied to your Tim Wise post and your claim that whites are 90% victims because they are the majority is absolute rubbish but you have constantly avoided any discussion since, just sticking with the 'I'm right, you're wrong' approach.


You are obviously in denial and it would clearly hurt you too much to admit the truth.... maybe your leftie ideals you cling to would be shaken too much by admitting that blacks are responsible for such massively high crime rates and massive high crime against Whites....




But the evidence is clear for all to see!!!