Be mindful of other sites.

by Andy Sun Jun 29, 2014 5:40 pm

First topic message reminder :

Especially a forum being run from Turkey, as is harbouring criminals involved in hacking.
And don't forget Coulson, who didn't do the hacking himself, but got his lackies to do his dirty work, then published the results.
Remarkable similarities.
I wonder how long he will go down for?
And the admin there is making no comment.
It will be interesting to see what action forumotion take against it, not just for breaking the forum rules, and also the law, but for allowing the illegally hacked posts to remain visible.

by Guest Tue Jul 01, 2014 8:29 pm

BigAndy9 wrote:
Nems wrote:

How did you see crime reference on a URL?

Now now Nems, stop drawing Handy Andy in - he really shouldn't be talking about this, it could ruin the case!

by Guest Tue Jul 01, 2014 8:29 pm

I think that means that she doesn't know what a Data Guardian is.

by Guest Tue Jul 01, 2014 8:34 pm

Sassy wrote:I think that means that she doesn't know what a Data Guardian is.

How did you get a crime ref from a URL?

by Guest Tue Jul 01, 2014 8:35 pm

Sassy wrote:Well HA, as you explained to me why it would be illegal for you to do that and gave the url for me to look it up for myself, it seems Nems is talking out of something other than her mouth.

So how did you see a crime ref on a URL?

by eddie Tue Jul 01, 2014 9:00 pm

Nems wrote:
Sassy wrote:Well HA, as you explained to me why it would be illegal for you to do that and gave the url for me to look it up for myself, it seems Nems is talking out of something other than her mouth.

So how did you see a crime ref on a URL?

:\\:[:
I got no idea what's going on!

by Guest Tue Jul 01, 2014 9:02 pm

eddie wrote:
Nems wrote:

So how did you see a crime ref on a URL?

:\\:[:
I got no idea what's going on!

https://scotlandyard.gov.uk/crimereferences

Click the link, log in using the username LydiaSarah and the password "borrox".

by Guest Tue Jul 01, 2014 9:08 pm

eddie wrote:
Nems wrote:

So how did you see a crime ref on a URL?

:\\:[:
I got no idea what's going on!

In a nutshell HA said he has reported the hacking to police.
I said give me the crime ref and I will get an update, he is less than keen for obvious reasons.
However Sassy has said it would be in breach of data protection and that's why she has to look herself through a URL that HA gave her. Now that has baffled me and so I am asking how she saw a crime ref on a URL.

by Guest Tue Jul 01, 2014 9:13 pm

Nobody said that the url was for a crime reference. If Nems had what she said she had, she would have known what a Data Guardian is and would have known what the url was for.

Plus, HA, like many people, doesn't trust her an inch. ::D::

by Guest Tue Jul 01, 2014 9:16 pm

Sassy wrote:Nobody said that the url was for a crime reference. If Nems had what she said she had, she would have known what a Data Guardian is and would have known what the url was for.

Plus, HA, like many people, doesn't trust her an inch. ::D::

Not quite. You were gone so long I was expecting a better effort. Google was not your friend on this occasion.
Why would I have a data guardian?
I was always referring to seeing the crime ref, you said HA had given you the URL to avoid data breach issues. So I ask you again how did you see a crime reference number?

by eddie Tue Jul 01, 2014 9:17 pm

BigAndy9 wrote:
eddie wrote:

:\\:[:
I got no idea what's going on!

https://scotlandyard.gov.uk/crimereferences

Click the link, log in using the username LydiaSarah and the password "borrox".

Was he really LydiaSarah?? She was a troll on sky!

How do you know his password is "borrox"... Suspect

are you bighackerandy?

And!!!

Why is there no pm sign next to your name??? Has it fallen off or was it stolen?

by Guest Tue Jul 01, 2014 9:19 pm

eddie wrote:
BigAndy9 wrote:

https://scotlandyard.gov.uk/crimereferences

Click the link, log in using the username LydiaSarah and the password "borrox".

Was he really LydiaSarah?? She was a troll on sky!

How do you know his password is "borrox"... are you bighackerandy?

And!!!

Why is there no pm sign next to your name??? Has it fallen off or was it stolen?

Bloody hell is nothing sacred?! Who pinched it? Suspect

by Guest Tue Jul 01, 2014 9:20 pm

eddie wrote:
BigAndy9 wrote:

https://scotlandyard.gov.uk/crimereferences

Click the link, log in using the username LydiaSarah and the password "borrox".

Was he really LydiaSarah?? She was a troll on sky!

How do you know his password is "borrox"... are you bighackerandy?

And!!!

Why is there no pm sign next to your name??? Has it fallen off or was it stolen?

Eh, good point eddie.

I'll ask Sassy to PM Handy Andy and see if my PM-diversion code is still working!

Basketball

by eddie Tue Jul 01, 2014 9:21 pm

Nems wrote:
eddie wrote:

Was he really LydiaSarah?? She was a troll on sky!

How do you know his password is "borrox"... are you bighackerandy?

And!!!

Why is there no pm sign next to your name??? Has it fallen off or was it stolen?

Bloody hell is nothing sacred?! Who pinched it?

I was scrolling quite fast and it caught my eye. Suspect

by Guest Tue Jul 01, 2014 9:21 pm

Sorry, but the administrator has prevented you sending private messages.

Why is that, Benji-boy?

by Guest Tue Jul 01, 2014 9:22 pm

Current date/time is Tue 1 Jul - 21:22
Information

Sorry, but the administrator has prevented you from sending private messages.

by eddie Tue Jul 01, 2014 9:26 pm

BigAndy9 wrote:Sorry, but the administrator has prevented you sending private messages.

Why is that, Benji-boy?

Got,to be a glitch - don't think Ben would do that Andy.

by Guest Tue Jul 01, 2014 9:26 pm

BigAndy9 wrote:Current date/time is Tue 1 Jul - 21:22
Information

Sorry, but the administrator has prevented you from sending private messages.

Poor BigA

by Guest Tue Jul 01, 2014 9:27 pm

eddie wrote:
BigAndy9 wrote:Sorry, but the administrator has prevented you sending private messages.

Why is that, Benji-boy?

Got,to be a glitch - don't think Ben would do that Andy.

Oh.

Right.

by eddie Tue Jul 01, 2014 9:28 pm

BigAndy9 wrote:
eddie wrote:

Got,to be a glitch - don't think Ben would do that Andy.

Oh.

Right.

You want me to PM him on your behalf?

by Guest Tue Jul 01, 2014 9:28 pm

eddie wrote:
BigAndy9 wrote:

Oh.

Right.

You want me to PM him on your behalf?

No, he can see these posts.

I think you know the score eddie.

by eddie Tue Jul 01, 2014 9:30 pm

BigAndy9 wrote:
eddie wrote:

You want me to PM him on your behalf?

No, he can see these posts.

I think you know the score eddie.

Andy, I really don't?
If I know the score about something I'll usually say.

by Guest Tue Jul 01, 2014 9:49 pm

Sent you a PM via other means Wink

by Cass Tue Jul 01, 2014 10:12 pm

so ben did you block Andy's PM facility or is he on a wind up so people will think you have blocked him?

the mystery deepens - maybe.....or not.......back to the footie....

by Fred Moletrousers Tue Jul 01, 2014 10:41 pm

Handy Andy wrote:I wonder if her Data Guardian (she should know who and what that is) is aware she is trying to glean information like this.
I don't trust ANYONE on flop, they are a proven bunch of liars, and it wouldn't suprise me if given away that sort of information would very quickly lead to my name, address and phone number being plastered all over it for all 8 or 9 remaining regular posters to view.

Thank you for your vote of confidence.

by Guest Wed Jul 02, 2014 3:24 am

Cass wrote:so ben did you block Andy's PM facility or is he on a wind up so people will think you have blocked him?

the mystery deepens - maybe.....or not.......back to the footie....

Chances are he has set it in his preferences so he can't be Pm`d Suspect

Preferences

Allow members to contact me by e-mail : Yes No

Allow members to send me private messages : Yes No

Allow visitor messages on my profile : All members My friends Nobody Hide this tab

Found under profile /set preferences

by Cass Wed Jul 02, 2014 4:32 am

Korban_Dallas wrote:
Cass wrote:so ben did you block Andy's PM facility or is he on a wind up so people will think you have blocked him?

the mystery deepens - maybe.....or not.......back to the footie....

Chances are he has set it in his preferences so he can't be Pm`d

Preferences

Allow members to contact me by e-mail : Yes No

Allow members to send me private messages : Yes No

Allow visitor messages on my profile : All members My friends Nobody Hide this tab

Found under profile /set preferences

that's what I was referring to....thanks.....tbh was too caught up in the footie to care but I think we've had enough nastiness here to last us quite some time.

by Guest Wed Jul 02, 2014 7:52 am

That is to stop others sending PMs to you, it does not prevent you sending them out.

Strange how Benji-boy hasn't replied, either on here, or to my email.

by eddie Wed Jul 02, 2014 7:56 am

Korban_Dallas wrote:
Cass wrote:so ben did you block Andy's PM facility or is he on a wind up so people will think you have blocked him?

the mystery deepens - maybe.....or not.......back to the footie....

Chances are he has set it in his preferences so he can't be Pm`d

Preferences

Allow members to contact me by e-mail : Yes No

Allow members to send me private messages : Yes No

Allow visitor messages on my profile : All members My friends Nobody Hide this tab

Found under profile /set preferences

That doesn't stop one SENDING them.

by Guest Wed Jul 02, 2014 7:58 am

BigAndy9 wrote:That is to stop others sending PMs to you, it does not prevent you sending them out.

Strange how Benji-boy hasn't replied, either on here, or to my email.

Well it seems you know a lot more than i about the Pm system.......................................................wait a minute ???? Mmmmm could it be Suspect

by Guest Wed Jul 02, 2014 8:04 am

eddie wrote:
Korban_Dallas wrote:

Chances are he has set it in his preferences so he can't be Pm`d

Preferences

Allow members to contact me by e-mail : Yes No

Allow members to send me private messages : Yes No

Allow visitor messages on my profile : All members My friends Nobody Hide this tab

Found under profile /set preferences

That doesn't stop one SENDING them.

Depends who you're sending it To maybe?
AKA
allow members to send me private messages : Yes No

And it was only a suggestion
but i am sure big Mandy will fix it (he might want to check his pop up filter as sometimes they can block the widgets this happens to me with "Discuss") Hey Mandy if you want some tongue

help

by Guest Wed Jul 02, 2014 8:42 am

Fred Moletrousers wrote:
Handy Andy wrote:I wonder if her Data Guardian (she should know who and what that is) is aware she is trying to glean information like this.
I don't trust ANYONE on flop, they are a proven bunch of liars, and it wouldn't suprise me if given away that sort of information would very quickly lead to my name, address and phone number being plastered all over it for all 8 or 9 remaining regular posters to view.

Thank you for your vote of confidence.

I'm sure it's nothing personal. Lefties believe that anyone who doesn't proscribe totally to their agenda must by default be: (a) stupid (b) SIXHIRB (c) a liar (d) a nazi...

by Guest Wed Jul 02, 2014 8:56 am

Korban_Dallas wrote:
eddie wrote:

That doesn't stop one SENDING them.
Depends who you're sending it To maybe?
AKA
allow members to send me private messages : Yes No

And it was only a suggestion
but i am sure big Mandy will fix it (he might want to check his pop up filter as sometimes they can block the widgets this happens to me with "Discuss") Hey Mandy if you want some help

Maybe you could remote in?

I think the message that pops up says it all "the administrator has restricted..."

by Guest Wed Jul 02, 2014 9:29 am

BigAndy9 wrote:
Korban_Dallas wrote:
Depends who you're sending it To maybe?
AKA
allow members to send me private messages : Yes No

And it was only a suggestion
but i am sure big Mandy will fix it (he might want to check his pop up filter as sometimes they can block the widgets this happens to me with "Discuss") Hey Mandy if you want some help

Maybe you could remote in?

I think the message that pops up says it all "the administrator has restricted..."

I could with your help you would need to install a
TeamViewer - the All-In-One Software
for Remote Support
http://www.teamviewer.com/en/index.aspx

I would then have to speak to you via phone for the randomly generated security number that you need before I could connect (this obviously changes with every new connection made )and speak to you on the phone as we sort out your problem
Obviously my name and address and phone number you would then have for liability and legal purposes, this would obviously be reciprocal and a network log of the activity to your and IP address I would also need in your case

However, with little to no reflection on the preposition you and i know that's never going to happen because I simply don`t believe you can be trusted with personal data of people where as i have a legal obligation to do just that ~(unless its public domain )
That may be unjust, but as St. Jerome said

The scars of others should teach us caution.

by Guest Wed Jul 02, 2014 9:35 am

BigAndy9 wrote:
Korban_Dallas wrote:
Depends who you're sending it To maybe?
AKA
allow members to send me private messages : Yes No

And it was only a suggestion
but i am sure big Mandy will fix it (he might want to check his pop up filter as sometimes they can block the widgets this happens to me with "Discuss") Hey Mandy if you want some help

Maybe you could remote in?

I think the message that pops up says it all "the administrator has restricted..."

administrator has restricted well, there's your answer... Is there anything you have done that would cause such an action IE abusive, threatening, or shit stirring Pm`s you have sent or made any false claims or accusations you have made ?

by Guest Wed Jul 02, 2014 10:04 am

Korban_Dallas wrote:
BigAndy9 wrote:

Maybe you could remote in?

I think the message that pops up says it all "the administrator has restricted..."
administrator has restricted well, there's your answer... Is there anything you have done that would cause such an action IE abusive, threatening, or shit stirring Pm`s you have sent or made any false claims or accusations you have made ?

Only the administrator could tell us if he believes i have done that.

Hence why i have asked...

But the administrator isn't keen on answering these questions.

by Guest Wed Jul 02, 2014 10:18 am

BigAndy9 wrote:
Korban_Dallas wrote:
administrator has restricted well, there's your answer... Is there anything you have done that would cause such an action IE abusive, threatening, or shit stirring Pm`s you have sent or made any false claims or accusations you have made ?

Only the administrator could tell us if he believes i have done that.

Hence why i have asked...

But the administrator isn't keen on answering these questions.

What have you been doing now Andy?

You got to remember though Andy, Ben is around six hours behind our time, I guess he will be in his bed.

by Guest Wed Jul 02, 2014 10:19 am

Joy Division wrote:
BigAndy9 wrote:

Only the administrator could tell us if he believes i have done that.

Hence why i have asked...

But the administrator isn't keen on answering these questions.

What have you been doing now Andy?

You got to remember though Andy, Ben is around six hours behind our time, I guess he will be in his bed.

A valid point Jd

by Andy Wed Jul 02, 2014 10:28 am

Fred Moletrousers wrote:
Handy Andy wrote:I wonder if her Data Guardian (she should know who and what that is) is aware she is trying to glean information like this.
I don't trust ANYONE on flop, they are a proven bunch of liars, and it wouldn't suprise me if given away that sort of information would very quickly lead to my name, address and phone number being plastered all over it for all 8 or 9 remaining regular posters to view.

Thank you for your vote of confidence.

My lack of confidence in the integrity of Flop posters is to do with the lack of condemnation of Jardon's actions, which amount to a breach of forum rules, are almost certainly the result of criminal action and have almost certainly contibuted to his banning (although another reason will no doubt be proffered).
As it happens, m' Lord, you are one a very few on there who I will happily engage with without rancour on here.

by Guest Wed Jul 02, 2014 10:32 am

Handy Andy wrote:
Fred Moletrousers wrote:

Thank you for your vote of confidence.
My lack of confidence in the integrity of Flop posters is to do with the lack of condemnation of Jardon's actions, which amount to a breach of forum rules, are almost certainly the result of criminal action and have almost certainly contibuted to his banning (although another reason will no doubt be proffered).
As it happens, m' Lord, you are one a very few on there who I will happily engage with without rancour on here.

Totally agree HA....too may others prop Jardon's actions up, or stay in silent approval , ridiculously claiming he can do no wrong.

D&D are and embarrassment...on top of other things.

by Guest Wed Jul 02, 2014 1:29 pm

Had a message from Forumotion to say that because they are taking it seriously they have deleted the Chit Chat section on Inaflap.

by Raggamuffin Wed Jul 02, 2014 1:39 pm

Oh dear. Poor Costa will be disappointed about that.

by Andy Wed Jul 02, 2014 1:41 pm

Sassy wrote:Had a message from Forumotion to say that because they are taking it seriously they have deleted the Chit Chat section on Inaflap.

Oh dear. What a shame. Never mind.

by Guest Wed Jul 02, 2014 1:44 pm

Sassy wrote:Had a message from Forumotion to say that because they are taking it seriously they have deleted the Chit Chat section on Inaflap.

....so sad when that happens Laughing

by Andy Wed Jul 02, 2014 1:47 pm

That will have spoilt Dean's holiday.

by Guest Wed Jul 02, 2014 1:54 pm

Handy Andy wrote:That will have spoilt Dean's holiday.

You know, he really only has himself to blame Andy, he is supposed to be a man in his 50's but you would never think it, when I first crossed swords with him, I honestly thought...ok daft young lad in his mid 20's ...

His fault he keeps idiots as mates and is happy to compromise security and information but only now he worries as he is being investigated, and although In general I'm not pleased to see people in strife with forums, he is one of those who truly deserves it...

Couldn't have happened to a not very nicer person.

What comes around eh!

by Guest Wed Jul 02, 2014 1:55 pm

Handy Andy wrote:That will have spoilt Dean's holiday.

by Guest Wed Jul 02, 2014 1:59 pm

What a bunch of spiteful little creeps you are. Bet you'd like to do that in real life to everyone who doesn't agree with you - silence them. Well this is the UK not fucking North Korea.

I've had enough - that's me over and out.

by Raggamuffin Wed Jul 02, 2014 2:00 pm

Tess wrote:What a bunch of spiteful little creeps you are. Bet you'd like to do that in real life to everyone who doesn't agree with you - silence them. Well this is the UK not fucking North Korea.

I've had enough - that's me over and out.

What was that section used for anyway? Bitching about other forums and non-members maybe?

by Guest Wed Jul 02, 2014 2:01 pm

Raggamuffin wrote:
Tess wrote:What a bunch of spiteful little creeps you are. Bet you'd like to do that in real life to everyone who doesn't agree with you - silence them. Well this is the UK not fucking North Korea.

I've had enough - that's me over and out.

What was that section used for anyway? Bitching about other forums and non-members maybe?

Was it? How shocking!. You'd never get that here.

Fucking hypocrites.

by Raggamuffin Wed Jul 02, 2014 2:02 pm

Tess wrote:
Raggamuffin wrote:

What was that section used for anyway? Bitching about other forums and non-members maybe?

Was it? How shocking!. You'd never get that here.

Fucking hypocrites.

I don't know - was it? I never read it. I have heard that it was though, plus maybe there were libellous comments in there.

by Sponsored content