Be mindful of other sites.

by Andy Sun Jun 29, 2014 5:40 pm

First topic message reminder :

Especially a forum being run from Turkey, as is harbouring criminals involved in hacking.
And don't forget Coulson, who didn't do the hacking himself, but got his lackies to do his dirty work, then published the results.
Remarkable similarities.
I wonder how long he will go down for?
And the admin there is making no comment.
It will be interesting to see what action forumotion take against it, not just for breaking the forum rules, and also the law, but for allowing the illegally hacked posts to remain visible.

by Cass Mon Jun 30, 2014 3:56 pm

stardesk wrote:I've clicked on Sassy's link and it says: 'Impossible to validate this litigation.' And it doesn't take you anywhere, a dead box.

Sorry Sassy, but you'll need to come up with something more positive, otherwise you'll keep getting a lot of stick.

I think she has already explained that because she has already validated it you cant do it again for the same case number. makes sense to me.

by Guest Mon Jun 30, 2014 5:15 pm

stardesk wrote:I've clicked on Sassy's link and it says: 'Impossible to validate this litigation.' And it doesn't take you anywhere, a dead box.

Sorry Sassy, but you'll need to come up with something more positive, otherwise you'll keep getting a lot of stick.

I explained Stardesk, it says that because I have already validated it, therefore it can't be validated again..

Here is the complete email, as I said, already been validated so the link cannot be used again:

forumotion.com
2014-06-29 04:09:34 pm
Litigation validation to inaflap.forumotion.co.uk
Hello,

To validate the sending of the litigation to inaflap.forumotion.co.uk, please click on this link : http://ww2.forumotion.com/litigation/open/e2ff1774/18272/ .

--------------------------------------
Cordially, Forumotion Support.
Reply, Reply All or Forward | More

by Guest Mon Jun 30, 2014 5:16 pm

Cass wrote:
stardesk wrote:I've clicked on Sassy's link and it says: 'Impossible to validate this litigation.' And it doesn't take you anywhere, a dead box.

Sorry Sassy, but you'll need to come up with something more positive, otherwise you'll keep getting a lot of stick.

I think she has already explained that because she has already validated it you cant do it again for the same case number. makes sense to me.

Thanks Cass, that's it exactly.

by Guest Mon Jun 30, 2014 5:17 pm

Sassy wrote:
stardesk wrote:I've clicked on Sassy's link and it says: 'Impossible to validate this litigation.' And it doesn't take you anywhere, a dead box.

Sorry Sassy, but you'll need to come up with something more positive, otherwise you'll keep getting a lot of stick.

I explained Stardesk, it says that because I have already validated it, therefore it can't be validated again..

Here is the complete email, as I said, already been validated so the link cannot be used again:

forumotion.com
2014-06-29 04:09:34 pm
Litigation validation to inaflap.forumotion.co.uk
Hello,

To validate the sending of the litigation to inaflap.forumotion.co.uk, please click on this link : http://ww2.forumotion.com/litigation/open/e2ff1774/18272/ .

--------------------------------------
Cordially, Forumotion Support.
Reply, Reply All or Forward | More

If Flap has now taken the PM's down then he obviously knows your serious.

It's his own doing for letting that sort of thing go on.

by eddie Mon Jun 30, 2014 5:41 pm

Joy Division wrote:Andy swears the PM's are fakes ...Eddie claims they are real.

One fake was created by Andy , just to show it had been done.

But one of the most interesting things on PMGate was that Eddie...you did say the other day that Sassy had lied about making that PM to HA...

As the PM contents were so I significant and a while back then why would Sassy remember that right away?

Why would that make her a liar?

You may have changed your tune on this since then though?

JD you are absolutely without a doubt one of the most shit-stirring entities I've ever had the misfortune to come across.
Why exactly are you bringing this up again?

Did sassy and I not fall out over it?? Did you want more cyber blood spilled?
Did you not come in your teeny weeny pants yet??

by Guest Mon Jun 30, 2014 5:46 pm

by Guest Mon Jun 30, 2014 5:49 pm

eddie wrote:
Joy Division wrote:Andy swears the PM's are fakes ...Eddie claims they are real.

One fake was created by Andy , just to show it had been done.

But one of the most interesting things on PMGate was that Eddie...you did say the other day that Sassy had lied about making that PM to HA...

As the PM contents were so I significant and a while back then why would Sassy remember that right away?

Why would that make her a liar?

You may have changed your tune on this since then though?

JD you are absolutely without a doubt one of the most shit-stirring entities I've ever had the misfortune to come across.
Why exactly are you bringing this up again?

Did sassy and I not fall out over it?? Did you want more cyber blood spilled?
Did you not come in your teeny weeny pants yet??

The honour of being a shit stirring munter belongs to you dreddie.

by Guest Mon Jun 30, 2014 5:53 pm

Philagain wrote:
eddie wrote:

JD you are absolutely without a doubt one of the most shit-stirring entities I've ever had the misfortune to come across.
Why exactly are you bringing this up again?

Did sassy and I not fall out over it?? Did you want more cyber blood spilled?
Did you not come in your teeny weeny pants yet??

The honour of being a shit stirring munter belongs to you dreddie.

At least she uses a spoon and not a scabby Penis. lol!

by Guest Mon Jun 30, 2014 5:54 pm

Phillipa wrote:
Philagain wrote:

The honour of being a shit stirring munter belongs to you dreddie.

At least she uses a spoon and not a scabby Penis.

I didn't think that gays had a penis.I thought they called it something else.

by Guest Mon Jun 30, 2014 7:44 pm

So, HA posted his crime ref yet?

by Irn Bru Mon Jun 30, 2014 8:26 pm

I've got the information

Police Constable Doxon. Dick Green Police Station, Chiswick High Road, West London.

Seriously, if HA has reported this to the cops then maybe it's better that he keeps the details to himself

by Guest Mon Jun 30, 2014 8:31 pm

Irn Bru wrote:I've got the information

Police Constable Doxon. Dick Green Police Station, Chiswick High Road, West London.

Seriously, if HA has reported this to the cops then maybe it's better that he keeps the details to himself

Quite, it's a number they give to you for YOU to quote when you are asking about an update, I'm sure they'd be thrilled if it was banded about and every bugger could ring them.

by Guest Mon Jun 30, 2014 8:38 pm

Sassy wrote:
Irn Bru wrote:I've got the information

Police Constable Doxon. Dick Green Police Station, Chiswick High Road, West London.

Seriously, if HA has reported this to the cops then maybe it's better that he keeps the details to himself

Quite, it's a number they give to you for YOU to quote when you are asking about an update, I'm sure they'd be thrilled if it was banded about and every bugger could ring them.

Im quite happy for him to PM me. I have a secure email that I could use to email the OIC.
Be more than happy to get an update for him.

by Guest Mon Jun 30, 2014 8:48 pm

Nems wrote:
Sassy wrote:

Quite, it's a number they give to you for YOU to quote when you are asking about an update, I'm sure they'd be thrilled if it was banded about and every bugger could ring them.

Im quite happy for him to PM me. I have a secure email that I could use to email the OIC.
Be more than happy to get an update for him.

Secure email?

Are you sure Nems?

Basketball

by Guest Mon Jun 30, 2014 8:49 pm

BigAndy9 wrote:
Nems wrote:

Im quite happy for him to PM me. I have a secure email that I could use to email the OIC.
Be more than happy to get an update for him.

Secure email?

Are you sure Nems?

Yes Andy its a police one

by Guest Mon Jun 30, 2014 8:51 pm

Nems wrote:
BigAndy9 wrote:

Secure email?

Are you sure Nems?

Yes Andy its a police one

Oh, that's definitely secure then lol

by Guest Mon Jun 30, 2014 8:56 pm

BigAndy9 wrote:
Nems wrote:

Yes Andy its a police one

Oh, that's definitely secure then lol

Exactly Andy. I cant imagine why HA is so reluctant Laughing

by Guest Mon Jun 30, 2014 9:10 pm

Maybe a trust issue? Or the fact that he has already done it and doesn't need your help.

by Guest Mon Jun 30, 2014 9:22 pm

Sassy wrote:Maybe a trust issue? Or the fact that he has already done it and doesn't need your help.

Or option number three of course,it didn't happen Razz

by Guest Mon Jun 30, 2014 9:30 pm

Nems wrote:
Sassy wrote:Maybe a trust issue? Or the fact that he has already done it and doesn't need your help.

Or option number three of course,it didn't happen

As we have all the screenshots and all the urls concerned I'm afraid that you wishing that it hadn't happened, maybe on Hugh's behalf, doesn't cut the mustard, in fact, not even the salt and pepper.

by eddie Mon Jun 30, 2014 9:31 pm

Are the police really going to take any of this seriously?
Jesus Christ!

What Phil did to me was worse and I don't see sassy or HA telling Phil how awful he was or advising me to phone the police!

by Guest Mon Jun 30, 2014 9:31 pm

Nems wrote:
Sassy wrote:Maybe a trust issue? Or the fact that he has already done it and doesn't need your help.

Or option number three of course,it didn't happen

Look,it's none of your business so stop asking Andy for the details do which cop shop he reported it to etc.

As well as being nasty,your nose always sticks in to where it's not wanted or needed.

by Guest Mon Jun 30, 2014 9:32 pm

eddie wrote:Are the police really going to take any of this seriously?
Jesus Christ!

What Phil did to me was worse and I don't see sassy or HA telling Phil how awful he was or advising me to phone the police!

No it bloody wasn't woman, get over it,he knows he done wrong.

by eddie Mon Jun 30, 2014 9:32 pm

Joy Division wrote:
Nems wrote:

Or option number three of course,it didn't happen

Look,it's none of your business so stop asking Andy for the details do which cop shop he reported it to etc.

As well as being nasty,your nose always sticks in to where it's not wanted or needed.

"Hallo pot, I'm kettle, you're black!"

by eddie Mon Jun 30, 2014 9:33 pm

Joy Division wrote:
eddie wrote:Are the police really going to take any of this seriously?
Jesus Christ!

What Phil did to me was worse and I don't see sassy or HA telling Phil how awful he was or advising me to phone the police!

No it bloody wasn't woman, get over it,he knows he done wrong.

As well as being nasty,your nose always sticks in to where it's not wanted or needed.

by Guest Mon Jun 30, 2014 9:33 pm

I'm embarrassed for all involved.

This is worse than David Brent's dance.

by Guest Mon Jun 30, 2014 9:34 pm

eddie wrote:Are the police really going to take any of this seriously?
Jesus Christ!

What Phil did to me was worse and I don't see sassy or HA telling Phil how awful he was or advising me to phone the police!

Well, I hate to bring it up again, but you didn't take it seriously when SM's full name, address and telephone number was published. I hardly think a first name without a surname comes near that, although he shouldn't have done it, nor does it come anywhere near someone hacking into HA's computer, as that is the only way it could have happened. Only pm's have been published, but who knows what other information about him they took. Could easily have been bank details etc.

by Guest Mon Jun 30, 2014 9:35 pm

eddie wrote:
Joy Division wrote:

Look,it's none of your business so stop asking Andy for the details do which cop shop he reported it to etc.

As well as being nasty,your nose always sticks in to where it's not wanted or needed.

"Hallo pot, I'm kettle, you're black!"

Oh right,,,being racist I see

JUST JOKING EDDIE Laughing

by Guest Mon Jun 30, 2014 9:37 pm

Sassy wrote:
eddie wrote:Are the police really going to take any of this seriously?
Jesus Christ!

What Phil did to me was worse and I don't see sassy or HA telling Phil how awful he was or advising me to phone the police!

Well, I hate to bring it up again, but you didn't take it seriously when SM's full name, address and telephone number was published. I hardly think a first name without a surname comes near that, although he shouldn't have done it, nor does it come anywhere near someone hacking into HA's computer, as that is the only way it could have happened. Only pm's have been published, but who knows what other information about him they took. Could easily have been bank details etc.

When the hell did that happen?

That's pretty bad.

by Guest Mon Jun 30, 2014 9:37 pm

Sassy wrote:
eddie wrote:Are the police really going to take any of this seriously?
Jesus Christ!

What Phil did to me was worse and I don't see sassy or HA telling Phil how awful he was or advising me to phone the police!

Well, I hate to bring it up again, but you didn't take it seriously when SM's full name, address and telephone number was published. I hardly think a first name without a surname comes near that, although he shouldn't have done it, nor does it come anywhere near someone hacking into HA's computer, as that is the only way it could have happened. Only pm's have been published, but who knows what other information about him they took. Could easily have been bank details etc.

She's full of it.

by eddie Mon Jun 30, 2014 9:38 pm

Sassy wrote:
eddie wrote:Are the police really going to take any of this seriously?
Jesus Christ!

What Phil did to me was worse and I don't see sassy or HA telling Phil how awful he was or advising me to phone the police!

Well, I hate to bring it up again, but you didn't take it seriously when SM's full name, address and telephone number was published. I hardly think a first name without a surname comes near that, although he shouldn't have done it, nor does it come anywhere near someone hacking into HA's computer, as that is the only way it could have happened. Only pm's have been published, but who knows what other information about him they took. Could easily have been bank details etc.

Sassy it was taken seriously. As soon as that post was spotted it was removed!
But SM herself told us not to bother as it wasn't her.....?
Let's not even go down that road.

I doubt HA's computer has been hacked lol. Whoever it was got into his Pm's on here or he gave them away himself.....how well do you know him????

by Guest Mon Jun 30, 2014 9:38 pm

BigAndy9 wrote:
Sassy wrote:

Well, I hate to bring it up again, but you didn't take it seriously when SM's full name, address and telephone number was published. I hardly think a first name without a surname comes near that, although he shouldn't have done it, nor does it come anywhere near someone hacking into HA's computer, as that is the only way it could have happened. Only pm's have been published, but who knows what other information about him they took. Could easily have been bank details etc.

When the hell did that happen?

That's pretty bad.

On ADO

by Guest Mon Jun 30, 2014 9:39 pm

eddie wrote:
Sassy wrote:

Well, I hate to bring it up again, but you didn't take it seriously when SM's full name, address and telephone number was published. I hardly think a first name without a surname comes near that, although he shouldn't have done it, nor does it come anywhere near someone hacking into HA's computer, as that is the only way it could have happened. Only pm's have been published, but who knows what other information about him they took. Could easily have been bank details etc.

Sassy it was taken seriously. As soon as that post was spotted it was removed!
But SM herself told us not to bother as it wasn't her.....?
Let's not even go down that road.

I doubt HA's computer has been hacked lol. Whoever it was got into his Pm's on here or he gave them away himself.....how well do you know him????

They know each other very well - she lets him remote in to her PC to ~~steal~~ fix things lmao

by Guest Mon Jun 30, 2014 9:40 pm

Sassy wrote:
BigAndy9 wrote:

When the hell did that happen?

That's pretty bad.

On ADO

Bloody hell. Who did that?

by eddie Mon Jun 30, 2014 9:40 pm

BigAndy9 wrote:
Sassy wrote:

Well, I hate to bring it up again, but you didn't take it seriously when SM's full name, address and telephone number was published. I hardly think a first name without a surname comes near that, although he shouldn't have done it, nor does it come anywhere near someone hacking into HA's computer, as that is the only way it could have happened. Only pm's have been published, but who knows what other information about him they took. Could easily have been bank details etc.

When the hell did that happen?

That's pretty bad.

Well,SM said it wasn't her so no harm done, even though the post was removed as soon as possible.
But it wasn't her, so....???

by Guest Mon Jun 30, 2014 9:40 pm

eddie wrote:Are the police really going to take any of this seriously?
Jesus Christ!

What Phil did to me was worse and I don't see sassy or HA telling Phil how awful he was or advising me to phone the police!

Exactly

by Guest Mon Jun 30, 2014 9:40 pm

eddie wrote:
Sassy wrote:

Well, I hate to bring it up again, but you didn't take it seriously when SM's full name, address and telephone number was published. I hardly think a first name without a surname comes near that, although he shouldn't have done it, nor does it come anywhere near someone hacking into HA's computer, as that is the only way it could have happened. Only pm's have been published, but who knows what other information about him they took. Could easily have been bank details etc.

Sassy it was taken seriously. As soon as that post was spotted it was removed!
But SM herself told us not to bother as it wasn't her.....?
Let's not even go down that road.

I doubt HA's computer has been hacked lol. Whoever it was got into his Pm's on here or he gave them away himself.....how well do you know him????

HA did not give them out himself and it was not someone from here who did it, and Hugh published them on Flap as you very well know. I know HA quite and so do others who I trust.

by Guest Mon Jun 30, 2014 9:41 pm

eddie wrote:
BigAndy9 wrote:

When the hell did that happen?

That's pretty bad.

Well,SM said it wasn't her so no harm done, even though the post was removed as soon as possible.
But it wasn't her, so....???

Hmmm it depends whether they honestly believed it was her i guess.

I must admit, i've posted details of BigM myself, but always apologised afterwards.

by Guest Mon Jun 30, 2014 9:42 pm

BigAndy9 wrote:
eddie wrote:

Well,SM said it wasn't her so no harm done, even though the post was removed as soon as possible.
But it wasn't her, so....???

Hmmm it depends whether they honestly believed it was her i guess.

I must admit, i've posted details of BigM myself, but always apologised afterwards.

...just a tad Christian at the end there Andy Laughing

by Guest Mon Jun 30, 2014 9:42 pm

eddie wrote:
BigAndy9 wrote:

When the hell did that happen?

That's pretty bad.

Well,SM said it wasn't her so no harm done, even though the post was removed as soon as possible.
But it wasn't her, so....???

Of course she said it wasn't her, she was frightened to death as she is Muslim and it was done by members of the BNP, and nothing was done to them and it wasn't taken down for some time, we had to fight to have it taken off.

by Guest Mon Jun 30, 2014 9:44 pm

BigAndy9 wrote:
eddie wrote:

Well,SM said it wasn't her so no harm done, even though the post was removed as soon as possible.
But it wasn't her, so....???

Hmmm it depends whether they honestly believed it was her i guess.

I must admit, i've posted details of BigM myself, but always apologised afterwards.

They did. Now I don't think for one second that Phil should have used Eddie's child's name, but there are millions of children with that name and no surname was attached, rather different to having private information taken from a computer and published on another site.

by Guest Mon Jun 30, 2014 9:45 pm

Jeez, is dreddie bringing all of this name crap up again.

It's not as if the name is that obscure anyways.

Quite common these days.

by Guest Mon Jun 30, 2014 9:47 pm

Sassy wrote:
BigAndy9 wrote:

Hmmm it depends whether they honestly believed it was her i guess.

I must admit, i've posted details of BigM myself, but always apologised afterwards.

They did. Now I don't think for one second that Phil should have used Eddie's child's name, but there are millions of children with that name and no surname was attached, rather different to having private information taken from a computer and published on another site.

rather different to having private information taken from a computer and published on another site.

?

by Guest Mon Jun 30, 2014 9:48 pm

Sassy wrote:
BigAndy9 wrote:

Hmmm it depends whether they honestly believed it was her i guess.

I must admit, i've posted details of BigM myself, but always apologised afterwards.

They did. Now I don't think for one second that Phil should have used Eddie's child's name, but there are millions of children with that name and no surname was attached, rather different to having private information taken from a computer and published on another site.

I agree, I said to Eddie she was over reacting as it was just the first name without a surname or any other details , Phil knows that was wrong, so there is just no way it's near as bad as having PM's and/or computers being hacked.

by Guest Mon Jun 30, 2014 9:49 pm

BigAndy9 wrote:
eddie wrote:

Well,SM said it wasn't her so no harm done, even though the post was removed as soon as possible.
But it wasn't her, so....???

Hmmm it depends whether they honestly believed it was her i guess.

I must admit, i've posted details of BigM myself, but always apologised afterwards.

Be mindful of other sites. - Page 4 48987_10

by eddie Mon Jun 30, 2014 9:49 pm

Sassy wrote:
BigAndy9 wrote:

Hmmm it depends whether they honestly believed it was her i guess.

I must admit, i've posted details of BigM myself, but always apologised afterwards.

They did. Now I don't think for one second that Phil should have used Eddie's child's name, but there are millions of children with that name and no surname was attached, rather different to having private information taken from a computer and published on another site.

Actually there aren't millions of kids with that name, it's not very common sassy, perhaps you've forgotten it so I won't labour the point.

Why do you keep saying that his computer was hacked?

by Guest Mon Jun 30, 2014 9:50 pm

eddie wrote:
Sassy wrote:

They did. Now I don't think for one second that Phil should have used Eddie's child's name, but there are millions of children with that name and no surname was attached, rather different to having private information taken from a computer and published on another site.

Actually there aren't millions of kids with that name, it's not very common sassy, perhaps you've forgotten it so I won't labour the point.

Why do you keep saying that his computer was hacked?

I cannot believe anyone would try to excuse what Phil did

by Guest Mon Jun 30, 2014 9:54 pm

Nems wrote:
eddie wrote:

Actually there aren't millions of kids with that name, it's not very common sassy, perhaps you've forgotten it so I won't labour the point.

Why do you keep saying that his computer was hacked?

I cannot believe anyone would try to excuse what Phil did

I didn't, I said I don't think for one second Phil should have done it.

However, I am taking the publishing of private pms, the information about them having been given to nobody, seriously and will continue to do so. I'm afraid if Flap, and especially Hugh, don't like it, bloody tough.

by eddie Mon Jun 30, 2014 9:54 pm

Philagain wrote:Jeez, is dreddie bringing all of this name crap up again.

It's not as if the name is that obscure anyways.

Quite common these days.

No isn't Phil.
You don't think it's out of order because you're a scumbag that was thinking of fucking an ex behind his sick partners back.
So why would you think bringing an innocent young boy into your pathetic arguments is bad?

You're nasty.
Nasty.

Don't forget you sick little fuck I have your phone number.
Perhaps Doug would like to know about your little plans?

See? I can get nasty too.

by Guest Mon Jun 30, 2014 9:55 pm

Nems wrote:
eddie wrote:

Actually there aren't millions of kids with that name, it's not very common sassy, perhaps you've forgotten it so I won't labour the point.

Why do you keep saying that his computer was hacked?

I cannot believe anyone would try to excuse what Phil did

Who's excusing anything?,Mathis is just another dig at Sassy, both me and Sassy said Phil had done wrong, but with only a first name, nowhere near as bad as this hacking scandals by that halfwits at Flop..

Stop trying to turn it into something else,you and your mate Eddie stayed silent when you saw the God Geeks hurl revolting insults at a toddler and the vile things they said of sassy and SM.....in fact,you both even claimed they revolting sick bastards were victims.

by Sponsored content