Golden Gate Bridge Suicide Net Plan Gets Boost

by Guest Wed Jun 25, 2014 6:12 pm

First topic message reminder :

It is hoped a net made of stainless steel cable extending below and from the side of the span will save hundreds of lives.

Officials say they have funds to build a suicide-prevention net at San Francisco Bay's Golden Gate Bridge where two jump to their deaths each month.

The bridge's board of directors will vote on Friday on the plan, which has been debated since the 1950s.

One of the obstacles - the price tag - fell away on Monday as officials announced they had $76m (£45m) for the project.

Most of the new money comes from federal transport programmes, while the rest will be paid out of the bridge's own reserves and state mental health funding.

The bridge district's plan calls for a net made of stainless steel cable extending 20ft below and 20ft from the side of the span.

Anyone who jumps from the span might be injured but would probably survive the fall, say officials.

"For whatever reason, suicidal people don't want to hurt themselves," Dennis Mulligan, the bridge district's general manager, told KTVU-TV.

"At other locations where nets have been up no individual has jumped into the net."

More than 1,400 people have leapt to their deaths from the 4,200-ft suspension bridge since it opened in 1937.

Every year, scores of people contemplating suicide are coaxed not to jump from the span.

On average, there are two suicides a month at the structure.

The Bridge Rail Foundation, which tracks fatalities on the span, said 46 people committed suicide there last year.

Backers of the suicide net were boosted in 2012 when President Barack Obama signed a transportation bill allowing federal funds to flow to the project.

http://news.sky.com/story/1288528/golden-gate-bridge-suicide-net-plan-gets-boost

Good idea, if people want to kill themselves they don't want to do something that will hurt them but not kill them, so it sounds logical.

by Guest Thu Jun 26, 2014 9:52 pm

Irn Bru wrote:
Didge wrote:

They have not agreed to anything.
The document is a proposal, have you never been to meetings where proposals are made?
You even elude to the fact it has not been agreed in your statement above and you are only going off the proposed document

On February 12, 2010 the Board of Directors certified the Final Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Assessment for the Golden Gate Bridge Physical Suicide Deterrent System Project with Alternative 3, the Net System, as the Preferred Alternative.

Some way on from that tomorrows meeting is to approve the funding for it. No-one has said otherwise. lol

You're clutching at straws Didge

Read back, I GOT IT BACK ON TRACK, you haven't even worked out yet that the proposal was agreed years ago and the meeting tomorrow was about finalising the funding.

by eddie Thu Jun 26, 2014 9:52 pm

Sassy wrote:
eddie wrote:Now sassy, I don't wish to fall out with you nor get involved in this row that's not mine, but it could be argued that you lied about those Pm's - saying you never recognised them then when Irn admitted his were real, changing your mind.

We all have lapses of memory.
Perhaps we should be tolerant of them.

And just so you know Eddie, I pm'd Ben and said until I was absolutely sure the pm's were correct I would say they weren't, because I felt that they fact they had been hacked was being used to attack this site, and requested that Ben look into it for me.

Yes I thought that was the case sassy.
Which means you didn't "forget" on the thread but outright lied then.
You could've said that on the thread - no one was judging you for the Pm's - jeez, we all send them!
It was the lying that wasn't palatable.

I sure you had good reason and knowing you've been ill I guess you had other more important things on your mind.

I have nothing against you per se sass, but unlike most on here (you included) I won't sit back and say nothing even if it's someone I get in with.

Now I'm not going to keep harping on, so I'll leave you to it.

by Guest Thu Jun 26, 2014 9:52 pm

Sassy wrote:
Original Quill wrote:

Not upsetting, Mogs. Setting up. When has anybody been interested in the Golden Gate Bridge until sassy, in her stalking of me, found that I was involved with the GGBHTD? From that day forward there has been all of this activity and interest.

When sassy is feeling bored and low-down, she goes into her inventory of topics in order to uncover something with which to start a fight with someone. She's been doing it back to ADO, and probably before. Sassy needs attention, as Nems points out. Sassy stalks, as Nems has alsw pointed out. She does these things when she believes she is not getting enough attention.

Once she has made up her mind, she's on the PM to her posse to all show up and start something. You are simply part of it, LD. Everyone knows what is going on, and everyone knows you know. Don't, like Irn, turn your palms up and say "Whaaaa...

Everyone knows what is going on.

Oh give it a rest you lying scum. You boasted about being a Director and about them sending a taxi for you to take you to a meeting because you were so important. It doesn't wash anymore Quim, we have seen right through you. The net will go ahead thank goodness, and you knew fuck all about it and thought that the very opposite of what was happening was going on. Con man.

I rest my case, this thread has nothing to do with suicides.

by Irn Bru Thu Jun 26, 2014 9:53 pm

Didge wrote:
Sassy wrote:
Didge wrote:

Still not agreed, but that thanks for proving it has little to do with suicides this whole debate.

What? The whole report was about stopping suicides!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

No I have just proven this debate was about Quill, I even offered to get this back on track about suicides and nobody even took that avenue.
What they did was desperately try to prove their point in regards to Quill using a proposal which has not been agreed upon.

Like I said, this debate has had little said about suicides itself

Until Quill made it that way - yes.

Go and read page 1 and you will see where it started.

by Guest Thu Jun 26, 2014 9:54 pm

Original Quill wrote:
lovedust wrote:

Quill: this an upsetting topic for several members.

Not upsetting, Mogs. Setting up. When has anybody been interested in the Golden Gate Bridge until sassy, in her stalking of me, found that I was involved with the GGBHTD? From that day forward there has been all of this activity and interest.

When sassy is feeling bored and low-down, she goes into her inventory of topics in order to uncover something with which to start a fight with someone. She's been doing it back to ADO, and probably before. Sassy needs attention, as Nems points out. Sassy stalks, as Nems has also pointed out. She does these things when she believes she is not getting enough attention.

Once she has made up her mind, she's on the PM to her posse to all show up and start something. You are simply part of it, LD. Everyone knows what is going on, and everyone knows you know. Don't, like Irn, turn your palms up and say "Whaaaa...

Everyone knows what is going on.

It's quite remarkable how you have managed to turn this thread into a 'sassy posse' thread Quill, I think your well off the mark, especially with LD,who has her own mind.

I like people for who they are if I do like them Quilll, and I really think your wasting your time telling Irn who not to bother with, I'm sure he knows full well who he can trust and who he maybe can not.

by Guest Thu Jun 26, 2014 9:54 pm

Sassy wrote:
Irn Bru wrote:

On February 12, 2010 the Board of Directors certified the Final Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Assessment for the Golden Gate Bridge Physical Suicide Deterrent System Project with Alternative 3, the Net System, as the Preferred Alternative.

Some way on from that tomorrows meeting is to approve the funding for it. No-one has said otherwise. lol

You're clutching at straws Didge

Read back, I GOT IT BACK ON TRACK, you haven't even worked out yet that the proposal was agreed years ago and the meeting tomorrow was about finalising the funding.

You see you are so vexed with dislike for a poster in Quill you are replying to Irn instead of me, showing the real intent of this thread

by Guest Thu Jun 26, 2014 9:54 pm

eddie wrote:
Sassy wrote:

And just so you know Eddie, I pm'd Ben and said until I was absolutely sure the pm's were correct I would say they weren't, because I felt that they fact they had been hacked was being used to attack this site, and requested that Ben look into it for me.

Yes I thought that was the case sassy.
Which means you didn't "forget" on the thread but outright lied then.
You could've said that on the thread - no one was judging you for the Pm's - jeez, we all send them!
It was the lying that wasn't palatable.

I sure you had good reason and knowing you've been ill I guess you had other more important things on your mind.

I have nothing against you per se sass, but unlike most on here (you included) I won't sit back and say nothing even if it's someone I get in with.

Now I'm not going to keep harping on, so I'll leave you to it.

It was protecting the forum until I had cleared it with Ben. It's amazing how so many of you don't give a damn about that.

by Guest Thu Jun 26, 2014 9:55 pm

Irn Bru wrote:
Didge wrote:

No I have just proven this debate was about Quill, I even offered to get this back on track about suicides and nobody even took that avenue.
What they did was desperately try to prove their point in regards to Quill using a proposal which has not been agreed upon.

Like I said, this debate has had little said about suicides itself

Until Quill made it that way - yes.

Go and read page 1 and you will see where it started.

I see where it started Irn, the moment the thread began, as it is easy to see how it played out

by Guest Thu Jun 26, 2014 9:56 pm

Didge wrote:
Sassy wrote:

Read back, I GOT IT BACK ON TRACK, you haven't even worked out yet that the proposal was agreed years ago and the meeting tomorrow was about finalising the funding.

You see you are so vexed with dislike for a poster in Quill you are replying to Irn instead of me, showing the real intent of this thread

Could be to do with the fact that idiots like you protect Quim while he lies his head off.

Sassy posse, that's a laugh, Quim posse protect the lying scumbag. He lied, he's a Walter Mitty.

by Irn Bru Thu Jun 26, 2014 9:56 pm

Didge wrote:
Sassy wrote:
Original Quill wrote:

Not upsetting, Mogs. Setting up. When has anybody been interested in the Golden Gate Bridge until sassy, in her stalking of me, found that I was involved with the GGBHTD? From that day forward there has been all of this activity and interest.

When sassy is feeling bored and low-down, she goes into her inventory of topics in order to uncover something with which to start a fight with someone. She's been doing it back to ADO, and probably before. Sassy needs attention, as Nems points out. Sassy stalks, as Nems has alsw pointed out. She does these things when she believes she is not getting enough attention.

Once she has made up her mind, she's on the PM to her posse to all show up and start something. You are simply part of it, LD. Everyone knows what is going on, and everyone knows you know. Don't, like Irn, turn your palms up and say "Whaaaa...

Everyone knows what is going on.

Oh give it a rest you lying scum. You boasted about being a Director and about them sending a taxi for you to take you to a meeting because you were so important. It doesn't wash anymore Quim, we have seen right through you. The net will go ahead thank goodness, and you knew fuck all about it and thought that the very opposite of what was happening was going on. Con man.

I rest my case, this thread has nothing to do with suicides.

You don't even have a case Didge. The thread title is...

Re: Golden Gate Bridge Suicide Net Plan Gets Boost

That's what it was about until Quill decided to rubbish it. Go and read it - it's on page 1.

by Guest Thu Jun 26, 2014 9:57 pm

Irn Bru wrote:
Didge wrote:

I rest my case, this thread has nothing to do with suicides.

You don't even have a case Didge. The thread title is...

Re: Golden Gate Bridge Suicide Net Plan Gets Boost

That's what it was about until Quill decided to rubbish it. Go and read it - it's on page 1.

No this was about Quill from the start and with each post you keep proving that

by eddie Thu Jun 26, 2014 9:58 pm

Sassy wrote:
eddie wrote:

Yes I thought that was the case sassy.
Which means you didn't "forget" on the thread but outright lied then.
You could've said that on the thread - no one was judging you for the Pm's - jeez, we all send them!
It was the lying that wasn't palatable.

I sure you had good reason and knowing you've been ill I guess you had other more important things on your mind.

I have nothing against you per se sass, but unlike most on here (you included) I won't sit back and say nothing even if it's someone I get in with.

Now I'm not going to keep harping on, so I'll leave you to it.

It was protecting the forum until I had cleared it with Ben. It's amazing how so many of you don't give a damn about that.

Protecting the forum from what?
The damage was done. What was lying going to solve?

Lying only makes things worse and I'm sure as a person who isn't used to lying, you know this already.
Now you're calling someone else a liar and there's a certain amount of irony to that.

So what were you protecting the forum from?

by Guest Thu Jun 26, 2014 9:59 pm

Didge wrote:
Sassy wrote:

Read back, I GOT IT BACK ON TRACK, you haven't even worked out yet that the proposal was agreed years ago and the meeting tomorrow was about finalising the funding.

You see you are so vexed with dislike for a poster in Quill you are replying to Irn instead of me, showing the real intent of this thread

Didge, Quill is harping on yet again about Sassy posse, now he does t have to say that, I think it could be a distraction from the fact he has maybe not been totally honest on his position on the board of the GGB?

That's what I think it could be and I'm not claiming it's gospel or anything like that, but I would have though also that Quill would have known all this well before it become public?

by Guest Thu Jun 26, 2014 9:59 pm

Sassy wrote:
Didge wrote:

You see you are so vexed with dislike for a poster in Quill you are replying to Irn instead of me, showing the real intent of this thread

Could be to do with the fact that idiots like you protect Quim while he lies his head off.

Sassy posse, that's a laugh, Quim posse protect the lying scumbag. He lied, he's a Walter Mitty.

And we are off with the abuse, because you do not like being exposed, sorry, you have been!

You really seem very obsessed with him, that is a tad disconcerting.

I do not agree with Quill on things like his view all right people are this and that in fact I find it a flawed philosophy and thus am nobody stooge, but can clearly see a set up when I see one

by Guest Thu Jun 26, 2014 10:00 pm

Didge wrote:
Irn Bru wrote:

You don't even have a case Didge. The thread title is...

Re: Golden Gate Bridge Suicide Net Plan Gets Boost

That's what it was about until Quill decided to rubbish it. Go and read it - it's on page 1.

No this was about Quill from the start and with each post you keep proving

that

Don't be stupid all your life. We were all saying how good it was until Quim said it wouldn't happen and he knew why, so Irn looked into it on the GG Bridge site to see if it would happen.

And Quim then said that that information was 'cow'.

He was the one who started the rubbish.

by Guest Thu Jun 26, 2014 10:00 pm

Quim? Lovely

You posted this thread because you saw an opportunity to have a go at Quill
Didge is right, nothing to do with suicide prevention.
Dress the pm lie up any which way you can Eddie is right you lied.

If Irn wasnt so honest with nothing to hide you would be denying it still.
Come on now you have been hoist by your own petard again, have the good grace to see that!

by Irn Bru Thu Jun 26, 2014 10:01 pm

Didge wrote:
Irn Bru wrote:
Didge wrote:

I rest my case, this thread has nothing to do with suicides.

You don't even have a case Didge. The thread title is...

Re: Golden Gate Bridge Suicide Net Plan Gets Boost

That's what it was about until Quill decided to rubbish it. Go and read it - it's on page 1.

No this was about Quill from the start and with each post you keep proving that

As you won't read it I'll copy it for you...

You are posting cow again, Sass. I just said it's not about money, stupid. It's about feasibility. It's about engineering.

The bridge is 1.7 miles long, in a single suspension. You could throw a few $-billion after the problem, and if the span goes into the drink you'll still look just as stupid, if not more so than you do now. Keep your eye on the doughnut, and not upon the hole.

That was the response to a post that drew off content from what was in the Board of Directors agenda so how could it be Cow?

You're on the wrong track Didge but keep going - clutching at straws.

by Guest Thu Jun 26, 2014 10:02 pm

Didge wrote:
Sassy wrote:

Could be to do with the fact that idiots like you protect Quim while he lies his head off.

Sassy posse, that's a laugh, Quim posse protect the lying scumbag. He lied, he's a Walter Mitty.

And we are off with the abuse, because you do not like being exposed, sorry, you have been!

You really seem very obsessed with him, that is a tad disconcerting.

I do not agree with Quill on things like his view all right people are this and that in fact I find it a flawed philosophy and thus am nobody stooge, but can clearly see a set up when I see one

The only one exposed was Quim, the only one against it was Quim, the only one who rubbished the information that it was going to happen was Quim. Put your glasses on.

by Guest Thu Jun 26, 2014 10:03 pm

Sassy wrote:
Didge wrote:

No this was about Quill from the start and with each post you keep proving

that

Don't be stupid all your life. We were all saying how good it was until Quim said it wouldn't happen and he knew why, so Irn looked into it on the GG Bridge site to see if it would happen.

And Quim then said that that information was 'cow'.

He was the one who started the rubbish.

More abuse, sorry but you did Sassy, as seen little or no talk has been made about the actual problems of suicide.

by Guest Thu Jun 26, 2014 10:03 pm

Sassy wrote:
Didge wrote:

And we are off with the abuse, because you do not like being exposed, sorry, you have been!

You really seem very obsessed with him, that is a tad disconcerting.

I do not agree with Quill on things like his view all right people are this and that in fact I find it a flawed philosophy and thus am nobody stooge, but can clearly see a set up when I see one

The only one exposed was Quim, the only one against it was Quim, the only one who rubbished the information that it was going to happen was Quim. Put your glasses on.

I have no need to do anything thank you, you seem so intent to shame him, that really proves even further this thread had naff all to do with suicides

by Guest Thu Jun 26, 2014 10:05 pm

Didge wrote:
Sassy wrote:

Read back, I GOT IT BACK ON TRACK, you haven't even worked out yet that the proposal was agreed years ago and the meeting tomorrow was about finalising the funding.

You see you are so vexed with dislike for a poster in Quill you are replying to Irn instead of me, showing the real intent of this thread

Didge, Quill is harping on yet again about Sassy posse, now he does t have to say that, I think it could be a distraction from the fact he has maybe not been totally honest on his position on the board of the GGB?

That's what I think it could be and I'm not claiming it's gospel or anything like that, but I would have though also that Quill would have known all this well before it become public?

by Guest Thu Jun 26, 2014 10:05 pm

Irn Bru wrote:
Didge wrote:

No this was about Quill from the start and with each post you keep proving that

As you won't read it I'll copy it for you...

You are posting cow again, Sass. I just said it's not about money, stupid. It's about feasibility. It's about engineering.

The bridge is 1.7 miles long, in a single suspension. You could throw a few $-billion after the problem, and if the span goes into the drink you'll still look just as stupid, if not more so than you do now. Keep your eye on the doughnut, and not upon the hole.

That was the response to a post that drew off content from what was in the Board of Directors agenda so how could it be Cow?

You're on the wrong track Didge but keep going - clutching at straws.

His post makes sense, except the abuse parts, but valid, but as seen sassy is intent on shaming him, proving it has nothing to do with suicides, I deliberately played up to both of you to prove this which I did.

by Guest Thu Jun 26, 2014 10:06 pm

Christ on a bike, you can't help some people.

by Guest Thu Jun 26, 2014 10:06 pm

Joy Division wrote:
Didge wrote:

You see you are so vexed with dislike for a poster in Quill you are replying to Irn instead of me, showing the real intent of this thread

Didge, Quill is harping on yet again about Sassy posse, now he does t have to say that, I think it could be a distraction from the fact he has maybe not been totally honest on his position on the board of the GGB?

That's what I think it could be and I'm not claiming it's gospel or anything like that, but I would have though also that Quill would have known all this well before it become public?

He is right though, except for Lovedust, as do not think she is, but this thread had one intention, to try to shame Quill.

That is rather sad and pathetic in my book, no better than what Hugh does on Flap

by Guest Thu Jun 26, 2014 10:07 pm

Didge wrote:
Irn Bru wrote:

As you won't read it I'll copy it for you...

You are posting cow again, Sass. I just said it's not about money, stupid. It's about feasibility. It's about engineering.

The bridge is 1.7 miles long, in a single suspension. You could throw a few $-billion after the problem, and if the span goes into the drink you'll still look just as stupid, if not more so than you do now. Keep your eye on the doughnut, and not upon the hole.

That was the response to a post that drew off content from what was in the Board of Directors agenda so how could it be Cow?

You're on the wrong track Didge but keep going - clutching at straws.

His post makes sense, except the abuse parts, but valid, but as seen sassy is intent on shaming him, proving it has nothing to do with suicides, I deliberately played up to both of you to prove this which I did.

His post is the absolute opposite of sense, and if you can't see that god help you, because nobody else will.

by Guest Thu Jun 26, 2014 10:08 pm

Sassy wrote:
Didge wrote:

His post makes sense, except the abuse parts, but valid, but as seen sassy is intent on shaming him, proving it has nothing to do with suicides, I deliberately played up to both of you to prove this which I did.

His post is the absolute opposite of sense, and if you can't see that god help you, because nobody else will.

God does not exist, so why would I need the help of a myth?

That makes no sense that statement and to me what he said does make sense.

by Guest Thu Jun 26, 2014 10:08 pm

Didge wrote:
Joy Division wrote:

Didge, Quill is harping on yet again about Sassy posse, now he does t have to say that, I think it could be a distraction from the fact he has maybe not been totally honest on his position on the board of the GGB?

That's what I think it could be and I'm not claiming it's gospel or anything like that, but I would have though also that Quill would have known all this well before it become public?

He is right though, except for Lovedust, as do not think she is, but this thread had one intention, to try to shame Quill.

That is rather sad and pathetic in my book, no better than what Hugh does on Flap

Fuck off, someone I loved very dearly committed suicide and Quim was the one who rubbished the net, when we showed him it was going to happen.

by Guest Thu Jun 26, 2014 10:09 pm

Didge wrote:
Sassy wrote:

His post is the absolute opposite of sense, and if you can't see that god help you, because nobody else will.

God does not exist, so why would I need the help of a myth?

That makes no sense that statement and to me what he said does make sense.

Then you really are beyond help.

by Guest Thu Jun 26, 2014 10:09 pm

Sassy wrote:
Didge wrote:

He is right though, except for Lovedust, as do not think she is, but this thread had one intention, to try to shame Quill.

That is rather sad and pathetic in my book, no better than what Hugh does on Flap

Fuck off, someone I loved very dearly committed suicide and Quim was the one who rubbished the net, when we showed him it was going to happen.

Golden Gate Bridge Suicide Net Plan Gets Boost - Page 3 Victim-card

by Guest Thu Jun 26, 2014 10:10 pm

Sassy wrote:
Didge wrote:

God does not exist, so why would I need the help of a myth?

That makes no sense that statement and to me what he said does make sense.

Then you really are beyond help.

I am not the one with the obsession, but that did make me chuckle

by Irn Bru Thu Jun 26, 2014 10:11 pm

Didge wrote:
Irn Bru wrote:
Didge wrote:

No this was about Quill from the start and with each post you keep proving that

As you won't read it I'll copy it for you...

You are posting cow again, Sass. I just said it's not about money, stupid. It's about feasibility. It's about engineering.

The bridge is 1.7 miles long, in a single suspension. You could throw a few $-billion after the problem, and if the span goes into the drink you'll still look just as stupid, if not more so than you do now. Keep your eye on the doughnut, and not upon the hole.

That was the response to a post that drew off content from what was in the Board of Directors agenda so how could it be Cow?

You're on the wrong track Didge but keep going - clutching at straws.

His post makes sense, except the abuse parts, but valid, but as seen sassy is intent on shaming him, proving it has nothing to do with suicides, I deliberately played up to both of you to prove this which I did.

How can it be valid when what he was responding to came from the agenda for the Board of Directors meeting tomorrow. I expect he'll tell all the directors how he feels tomorrow then lol
You see Didge - you haven't proved anything and your clutching at straws - very short one's.

by Guest Thu Jun 26, 2014 10:11 pm

Didge wrote:
Joy Division wrote:

Didge, Quill is harping on yet again about Sassy posse, now he does t have to say that, I think it could be a distraction from the fact he has maybe not been totally honest on his position on the board of the GGB?

That's what I think it could be and I'm not claiming it's gospel or anything like that, but I would have though also that Quill would have known all this well before it become public?

He is right though, except for Lovedust, as do not think she is, but this thread had one intention, to try to shame Quill.

That is rather sad and pathetic in my book, no better than what Hugh does on Flap

Didge..quarrelling aside, many of is do it , but I honestly don't think this thread had any malicious intentions.

by Guest Thu Jun 26, 2014 10:12 pm

Joy Division wrote:
Didge wrote:

He is right though, except for Lovedust, as do not think she is, but this thread had one intention, to try to shame Quill.

That is rather sad and pathetic in my book, no better than what Hugh does on Flap

Didge..quarrelling aside, many of is do it , but I honestly don't think this thread had any malicious intentions.

Of course it did Joy, all that has been mainly talked about is a claim to Quill being exposed.

Really says little for the major problem of people committing suicide.

by Guest Thu Jun 26, 2014 10:14 pm

Irn Bru wrote:
Didge wrote:

His post makes sense, except the abuse parts, but valid, but as seen sassy is intent on shaming him, proving it has nothing to do with suicides, I deliberately played up to both of you to prove this which I did.

How can it be valid when what he was responding to came from the agenda for the Board of Directors meeting tomorrow. I expect he'll tell all the directors how he feels tomorrow then lol
You see Didge - you haven't proved anything and your clutching at straws - very short one's.

Irn, you are just not one step ahead as me, this thread had no purpose to debate about suicides, as has been proven, it did though have every intent to draw Quill in, that is easy to see why, so please spare me the clutching at straws, because I guess sassy drew the short one to start this thread.

by Irn Bru Thu Jun 26, 2014 10:16 pm

Didge wrote:
Joy Division wrote:
Didge wrote:

He is right though, except for Lovedust, as do not think she is, but this thread had one intention, to try to shame Quill.

That is rather sad and pathetic in my book, no better than what Hugh does on Flap

Didge..quarrelling aside, many of is do it , but I honestly don't think this thread had any malicious intentions.

Of course it did Joy, all that has been mainly talked about is a claim to Quill being exposed.

Really says little for the major problem of people committing suicide.

It's quite clear now Didge that you don't care about the suicide aspect to this project which is a shame. The thread started off on exactly that until Quill set about rubbishing something that came from a source that he should have known about. It really is that simple.

by Guest Thu Jun 26, 2014 10:17 pm

Irn Bru wrote:
Didge wrote:

His post makes sense, except the abuse parts, but valid, but as seen sassy is intent on shaming him, proving it has nothing to do with suicides, I deliberately played up to both of you to prove this which I did.

How can it be valid when what he was responding to came from the agenda for the Board of Directors meeting tomorrow. I expect he'll tell all the directors how he feels tomorrow then lol
You see Didge - you haven't proved anything and your clutching at straws - very short one's.

So, tomorrow they should approve the funding, something Quim said they wouldn't be talking about, they will then put in place the plan the they have already worked on, something Quim said would never be done but was done years ago, and then people will be a lot safer, staff will not be traumatised by suicides and accidents won't happen because of motorists being distracted, all of which the Directors had already discussed and agreed and had an engineering firm do a study and draw up plans. I think that's about it, don't you Irn? Thankfully the suicide rate will go right down. And very happily, as he is not a Director, Quim won't be able to stop it. I call that a result. What other people call it I don't give a damn.

by Guest Thu Jun 26, 2014 10:17 pm

by Guest Thu Jun 26, 2014 10:20 pm

Irn Bru wrote:
Didge wrote:

Of course it did Joy, all that has been mainly talked about is a claim to Quill being exposed.

Really says little for the major problem of people committing suicide.

It's quite clear now Didge that you don't care about the suicide aspect to this project which is a shame. The thread started off on exactly that until Quill set about rubbishing something that came from a source that he should have known about. It really is that simple.

Golden Gate Bridge Suicide Net Plan Gets Boost - Page 3 MjAxMi01ZDlmZDI2NjdhZTY2ZjMy

No we see that you and sassy never cared about suicides by the fact you have hardly talked about it from the start, sorry but playing the guilt trip card is also very pathetic Irn as I can do it too

Try again

by Guest Thu Jun 26, 2014 10:22 pm

Never mind Didge, Quim will be very relieved you diverted the thread.

We are just relieved that he won't get his way and the net will be installed and people won't die there.

by Irn Bru Thu Jun 26, 2014 10:22 pm

Didge wrote:
Irn Bru wrote:
Didge wrote:

His post makes sense, except the abuse parts, but valid, but as seen sassy is intent on shaming him, proving it has nothing to do with suicides, I deliberately played up to both of you to prove this which I did.

How can it be valid when what he was responding to came from the agenda for the Board of Directors meeting tomorrow. I expect he'll tell all the directors how he feels tomorrow then lol
You see Didge - you haven't proved anything and your clutching at straws - very short one's.

Irn, you are just not one step ahead as me, this thread had no purpose to debate about suicides, as has been proven, it did though have every intent to draw Quill in, that is easy to see why, so please spare me the clutching at straws, because I guess sassy drew the short one to start this thread.

Quill drew himself in with a post that tried to rubbish a poster who drew off something from a perfectly legitimate source. No-one made him do that and the thread could have continued with reasonable discussion on the subject. Quill changed that.
You're clutching at straws and not at all interested in the suicide aspect and the benefits of the project. If you were you would be addressing that aspect of it but you're not.
Would you like to do that now?

by eddie Thu Jun 26, 2014 10:23 pm

Didge wrote:
Irn Bru wrote:

It's quite clear now Didge that you don't care about the suicide aspect to this project which is a shame. The thread started off on exactly that until Quill set about rubbishing something that came from a source that he should have known about. It really is that simple.

No we see that you and sassy never cared about suicides by the fact you have hardly talked about it from the start, sorry but playing the guilt trip card is also very pathetic Irn as I can do it too

Try again

I think that calling someone a liar when you have just been found lying is a tad unfair.
Anyhoo....

by Guest Thu Jun 26, 2014 10:26 pm

Irn Bru wrote:
Didge wrote:

Irn, you are just not one step ahead as me, this thread had no purpose to debate about suicides, as has been proven, it did though have every intent to draw Quill in, that is easy to see why, so please spare me the clutching at straws, because I guess sassy drew the short one to start this thread.

Quill drew himself in with a post that tried to rubbish a poster who drew off something from a perfectly legitimate source. No-one made him do that and the thread could have continued with reasonable discussion on the subject. Quill changed that.
You're clutching at straws and not at all interested in the suicide aspect and the benefits of the project. If you were you would be addressing that aspect of it but you're not.
Would you like to do that now?

Oh behave, he thread was started to draw him in the first place, it so obvious to man, how the thread panned out, seriously people are not fooled Irn as seen, the fact you argue so strongly proves this, as I know you all to well myself.

I would like to talk about what this thread should be about suicides, but as seen you are desperate to shame someone, that really proves my point on why the thread was started and I only set out to prove what you are proving now, that it was a set up!

by Irn Bru Thu Jun 26, 2014 10:27 pm

Didge wrote:
Irn Bru wrote:
Didge wrote:

Of course it did Joy, all that has been mainly talked about is a claim to Quill being exposed.

Really says little for the major problem of people committing suicide.

It's quite clear now Didge that you don't care about the suicide aspect to this project which is a shame. The thread started off on exactly that until Quill set about rubbishing something that came from a source that he should have known about. It really is that simple.

No we see that you and sassy never cared about suicides by the fact you have hardly talked about it from the start, sorry but playing the guilt trip card is also very pathetic Irn as I can do it too

Try again

It's not being discussed because you are more interested in not discussing it. I'm just responding to what you are posting which isn't even addressing the subject of suicides. Point proven - clutching at straws.

by Guest Thu Jun 26, 2014 10:28 pm

eddie wrote:
Didge wrote:

No we see that you and sassy never cared about suicides by the fact you have hardly talked about it from the start, sorry but playing the guilt trip card is also very pathetic Irn as I can do it too

Try again

I think that calling someone a liar when you have just been found lying is a tad unfair.
Anyhoo....

That is because the thread was about trying to expose someone as seen, which validates your point.

by Guest Thu Jun 26, 2014 10:28 pm

Irn Bru wrote:
Didge wrote:

No we see that you and sassy never cared about suicides by the fact you have hardly talked about it from the start, sorry but playing the guilt trip card is also very pathetic Irn as I can do it too

Try again

It's not being discussed because you are more interested in not discussing it. I'm just responding to what you are posting which isn't even addressing the subject of suicides. Point proven - clutching at straws.

You mean discussing Quill or suicides?

by Guest Thu Jun 26, 2014 10:30 pm

Original Quill wrote:
lovedust wrote:

Quill: this an upsetting topic for several members.

Not upsetting, Mogs. Setting up. When has anybody been interested in the Golden Gate Bridge until sassy, in her stalking of me, found that I was involved with the GGBHTD? From that day forward there has been all of this activity and interest.

When sassy is feeling bored and low-down, she goes into her inventory of topics in order to uncover something with which to start a fight with someone. She's been doing it back to ADO, and probably before. Sassy needs attention, as Nems points out. Sassy stalks, as Nems has also pointed out. She does these things when she believes she is not getting enough attention.

Once she has made up her mind, she's on the PM to her posse to all show up and start something. You are simply part of it, LD. Everyone knows what is going on, and everyone knows you know. Don't, like Irn, turn your palms up and say "Whaaaa...

Everyone knows what is going on.

1) I saw this topic on the mainboard, with 0 replies and started posting in it, so when you say I was called in by pm, you made that up.

2. Mine was the first reply after the OP. You had yet to join and once you did, at no point did I say an impolite word to or about you, so when you claim I've made some sort of posse-attack on you, you made that up.

3. I'm in this thread because I lost someone two years ago, so when you say my presence here has anything to do with you, you made that up.

You are being rude and you are out of order.

by Irn Bru Thu Jun 26, 2014 10:30 pm

Didge wrote:
Irn Bru wrote:
Didge wrote:

Irn, you are just not one step ahead as me, this thread had no purpose to debate about suicides, as has been proven, it did though have every intent to draw Quill in, that is easy to see why, so please spare me the clutching at straws, because I guess sassy drew the short one to start this thread.

Quill drew himself in with a post that tried to rubbish a poster who drew off something from a perfectly legitimate source. No-one made him do that and the thread could have continued with reasonable discussion on the subject. Quill changed that.
You're clutching at straws and not at all interested in the suicide aspect and the benefits of the project. If you were you would be addressing that aspect of it but you're not.
Would you like to do that now?

Oh behave, he thread was started to draw him in the first place, it so obvious to man, how the thread panned out, seriously people are not fooled Irn as seen, the fact you argue so strongly proves this, as I know you all to well myself.

I would like to talk about what this thread should be about suicides, but as seen you are desperate to shame someone, that really proves my point on why the thread was started and I only set out to prove what you are proving now, that it was a set up!

It's you that's doing the arguing. I'm quite happy to discuss the merits of the safety net and the benefits it will bring. Are you or do you just want to keep on arguing and making unfounded accusations?

by Guest Thu Jun 26, 2014 10:31 pm

We all know that a certain fraternity like to call each other in every now and then.

Look folks, we know - get over it!

by Guest Thu Jun 26, 2014 10:33 pm

Irn Bru wrote:
Didge wrote:

Oh behave, he thread was started to draw him in the first place, it so obvious to man, how the thread panned out, seriously people are not fooled Irn as seen, the fact you argue so strongly proves this, as I know you all to well myself.

I would like to talk about what this thread should be about suicides, but as seen you are desperate to shame someone, that really proves my point on why the thread was started and I only set out to prove what you are proving now, that it was a set up!

It's you that's doing the arguing. I'm quite happy to discuss the merits of the safety net and the benefits it will bring. Are you or do you just want to keep on arguing and making unfounded accusations?

Odd it takes two or more to argue, so that is gobbledygook Irn, I just know you too well.
Happy to discuss, as yet have not seen you ask me anything on the matter.

by Irn Bru Thu Jun 26, 2014 10:34 pm

Didge wrote:
Irn Bru wrote:
Didge wrote:

No we see that you and sassy never cared about suicides by the fact you have hardly talked about it from the start, sorry but playing the guilt trip card is also very pathetic Irn as I can do it too

Try again

It's not being discussed because you are more interested in not discussing it. I'm just responding to what you are posting which isn't even addressing the subject of suicides. Point proven - clutching at straws.

You mean discussing Quill or suicides?

Well you obviously don't want to discuss the aspects of the suicides. In fact with all the words that you have written on this thread you haven't even offered an opinion on the merits or the benefits that it may bring.

Job done then.

by Sponsored content