Tommy Robinson denies spending over £400,000 in donations from far-right supporters on drugs, luxuries

by Ben Reilly Thu Mar 18, 2021 9:22 am

First topic message reminder :

Mr Robertson alleged his employer said he had “mates I’ve got to pay back” for “seshes”. “We realised that he was withdrawing huge amounts of [donations] in cash from a business bank account, and just giving it to his friends who were selling him coke and who he owed for nights out,” he added.

“That wasn’t what we signed up for when we told our supporters that we needed it for kit, expenses, transport, security and staff costs.”

His concerns were echoed by another former employee who said they were not properly remunerated while working for Robinson, and a third person said payments they were due were delayed for several months.

Mr Robertson claimed that when drunk, Robinson would boast of being “f***ing loaded” and making “mad money”, while making lavish purchases, including a new car and designer clothes.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/tommy-robinson-cocaine-donations-prison-b1787467.html

by Syl Sat Mar 20, 2021 7:58 pm

[quote="Korben"]As for Saville, why would his religion be mentioned?

Why would the religion of ethnic people be mentioned ....that's exactly my point
The Quran does not condone child abuse any more or less than the bible does ....

[/quote

Korben, If Saville had targeted only young Muslim girls, I am pretty sure his own religion would have been brought into the equation.

by Guest Sat Mar 20, 2021 8:20 pm

Syl wrote:
Korben wrote:As for Saville, why would his religion be mentioned?

Why would the religion of ethnic people be mentioned ....that's exactly my point
The Quran does not condone child abuse any more or less than the bible does ....

[/quote

Korben, If Saville had targeted only young Muslim girls, I am pretty sure his own religion would have been brought into the equation.

As i pointed out they don't just target "white girls" However they are more "white girls" in this country so .....

Anyway i am finding this topic disturbing and will not make further comment especially as the Actual topic is not child sexual abuse but TR conning his supporters out of Money to support his life style

by Syl Sat Mar 20, 2021 11:56 pm

Korben wrote:
Syl wrote:
As i pointed out they don't just target "white girls" However they are more "white girls" in this country so .....

Anyway i am finding this topic disturbing and will not make further comment especially as the Actual topic is not child sexual abuse but TM conning his supporters out of Money to support his life style

I understand Korben, no problem.x

by JulesV Sun Mar 21, 2021 2:04 pm

It's like the cult of Trump all over again.

We all know that if "cocaine snorter" is added to his long list of odious crimes/habits it will make no difference to his fans. They will still love him just as much.

He is obsessed with being in the limelight and getting frequently arrested - it brings in the donations. It's how he makes a living, living in the lap of luxury, that is.

by Tommy Monk Sun Mar 21, 2021 3:09 pm

I don't like Tommy Robinson, I think he is an arse, and I'm insulted to be associated with him, plus the fact that I hadn't even posted on this thread but Andy was allowed yet another unwarranted snipe at me, which is why I retaliated as I did.

And as for the Pakistani Muslim child rape gangs, they targeted predominantly white girls, but also boys and other ethnicities... But all their targets were non Muslim.

by Ben Reilly Tue Mar 23, 2021 1:25 pm

Tommy Monk wrote:

I don't like Tommy Robinson, I think he is an arse, and I'm insulted to be associated with him, plus the fact that I hadn't even posted on this thread but Andy was allowed yet another unwarranted snipe at me, which is why I retaliated as I did.

And as for the Pakistani Muslim child rape gangs, they targeted predominantly white girls, but also boys and other ethnicities... But all their targets were non Muslim.

Right, so you accused him of supporting child rapists and murderers. Not exactly a proportionate response.

by Maddog Tue Mar 23, 2021 2:56 pm

Tommy Monk wrote:

I don't like Tommy Robinson, I think he is an arse, and I'm insulted to be associated with him, plus the fact that I hadn't even posted on this thread but Andy was allowed yet another unwarranted snipe at me, which is why I retaliated as I did.

And as for the Pakistani Muslim child rape gangs, they targeted predominantly white girls, but also boys and other ethnicities... But all their targets were non Muslim.

Next time just tell Andy he's a whiney little bitch with sand in his vagina. It's probably acceptable on the forum and slightly more accurate.

by Maddog Tue Mar 23, 2021 2:56 pm

Tommy Monk wrote:

I don't like Tommy Robinson, I think he is an arse, and I'm insulted to be associated with him, plus the fact that I hadn't even posted on this thread but Andy was allowed yet another unwarranted snipe at me, which is why I retaliated as I did.

And as for the Pakistani Muslim child rape gangs, they targeted predominantly white girls, but also boys and other ethnicities... But all their targets were non Muslim.

Next time just tell Andy he's a whiney little bitch with sand in his vagina. It's probably acceptable on the forum and slightly more accurate.

by Tommy Monk Tue Mar 23, 2021 3:51 pm

Ben Reilly wrote:
Tommy Monk wrote:

I don't like Tommy Robinson, I think he is an arse, and I'm insulted to be associated with him, plus the fact that I hadn't even posted on this thread but Andy was allowed yet another unwarranted snipe at me, which is why I retaliated as I did.

And as for the Pakistani Muslim child rape gangs, they targeted predominantly white girls, but also boys and other ethnicities... But all their targets were non Muslim.

Right, so you accused him of supporting child rapists and murderers. Not exactly a proportionate response.

If he wants to start popping up on threads just to make snide remarks about me, with no action from mods, then I will retaliate in any way I see fit.

We had this problem before, and I ignored most of it, eventually I started retaliating, only for the cry baby instigator to start complaining about my retaliatory remarks... And it was only then that Vic got a handle on it and action was taken against the instigator/s on further occasions... But now Vic has gone, the idiots have not wasted any time in coming back here and restarting their campaign of mud slinging at me... With no action being taken once more.

And andy is a big supporter of the labour govt and councils under which these Pakistan Muslim child rape gangs were allowed to operate with impunity... They even actively worked to try to stop anyone revealing the truth, or even daring to talk about it by shouting them down accusations of racism ...

Tommy Robinson actively spoke out about it and the dangers of Islamism here in UK... Andy hates him for doing that... So, it's pretty clear which side his bread is buttered...

by JulesV Tue Mar 23, 2021 6:57 pm

Tommy Monk wrote: the idiots have not wasted any time in coming back here ..........

What idiots? Name them? scratch

''coming back here''? Members come and go, all the time in forums. Tommy Robinson denies spending over £400,000 in donations from far-right supporters on drugs, luxuries - Page 2 2190311264

Tommy Robinson denies spending over £400,000 in donations from far-right supporters on drugs, luxuries - Page 2 2190311264

Most of the people posting right now, have had very long spells away from here - months at a time. So what? It's their choice.
Wolfie never returned anyway - so where does that leave your theory?!

You're no saint, Tommy Monks, you have a vicious, callous mouth and you have said some really nasty things to me in the past, but I have ultimately shrugged and moved on.

And it's not as if you're the first to get basemented, Tommy. Others have been in the basement numerous times.
Best thing is for both you and Andy to learn lessons from this, and move on from this.

by JulesV Tue Mar 23, 2021 7:01 pm

On topic:

For the record it's not just 'Labour party obsessives' who criticise Tommy Robinson. I mean....I'm not aware that the OP of this criticising thread can be described as such.

Even Robinson's own mates have seen the light and turned against him, his mates are the ones who spilled the beans on him.

by Tommy Monk Tue Mar 23, 2021 7:34 pm

JulesV wrote:
Tommy Monk wrote: the idiots have not wasted any time in coming back here ..........

What idiots? Name them?

''coming back here''? Members come and go, all the time in forums.
Most of the people posting right now, have had very long spells away from here - months at a time. So what? It's their choice.
Wolfie never returned anyway - so where does that leave your theory?!

You're no saint, Tommy Monks, you have a vicious, callous mouth and you have said some really nasty things to me in the past, but I have ultimately shrugged and moved on.

And it's not as if you're the first to get basemented, Tommy. Others have been in the basement numerous times.
Best thing is for both you and Andy to learn lessons from this, and move on from this.

Stop trying to play the victim... You live in a fantasy world where you can do no wrong and it's always everyone else's fault...

And no, I'm not the first to be put in the basement... Others have been basemented numerous times... But it is the first time ever that I have been basemented on any forum.

And that just shows you are waffling bollocks about how bad I am... And it shows that it is actually others who are the problem...!

by JulesV Tue Mar 23, 2021 11:02 pm

Victim?? PMSL. lol!

Lol I did not mention your insults in order to complain about being a ''victim'' I only mentioned it to remind you that you were no saint, that's all.

And you unnecessarily dragged others into your silly row - by saying that a bunch of idiots have returned to this site. That's naaasty - and if you don't even realise this, it shows how tragically tone deaf you are. Btw most people prefer a lively forum!

I'll leave it there.

-------------------------------------------------------------

As for Tommy Robinson - maybe if a RESPECTED person played his role it might be a different matter. Rather than a longstanding criminal (jailed for GBH, fraud etc) who many believe is just play acting a fake role, just for the financial donations.

by Ben Reilly Wed Mar 24, 2021 12:11 pm

Listen to Maddog on this one, Tommy.

by Tommy Monk Wed Mar 24, 2021 3:53 pm

eddie wrote:Let us leave it there and get back to the topic, but whilst I’m here, if I see anyone jumping in a thread just to make a snide remark about another poster I’m going to take action.
Post about the topic, not about a fellow poster.

Grow the fuck up.

Ben, you should listen to Eddie on this one... She's got the right idea!

by Ben Reilly Sat Mar 27, 2021 1:55 pm

Tommy Monk wrote:
eddie wrote:Let us leave it there and get back to the topic, but whilst I’m here, if I see anyone jumping in a thread just to make a snide remark about another poster I’m going to take action.
Post about the topic, not about a fellow poster.

Grow the fuck up.

Ben, you should listen to Eddie on this one... She's got the right idea!

He said you support Tommy Robinson, do you not?

by Andy Sat Mar 27, 2021 2:02 pm

by Tommy Monk Sat Mar 27, 2021 4:14 pm

Ben Reilly wrote:
Tommy Monk wrote:

Ben, you should listen to Eddie on this one... She's got the right idea!

He said you support Tommy Robinson, do you not?

He said he was my "favourite politician"... Then he said I'd made a £10,000 donation that he'd spent on coke and whores...

I actually think he's an arse, but he was right about the Pakistani Muslim child rape gangs, and about labour govt and councils and other local authorities knowing about it and actively covering it all up.

by Tommy Monk Sat Mar 27, 2021 4:15 pm

Andy wrote:

Yes... Those bloody left wing national socialists...

by Original Quill Sat Mar 27, 2021 4:28 pm

Dream on... Rolling Eyes

by Tommy Monk Sat Mar 27, 2021 4:37 pm

National Socialist Party most often refers to the National Socialist German Workers' Party (German: Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei, NSDAP), commonly known as the Nazi Party, which existed in Germany between 1920 and 1945 and ruled the country from 1933 to 1945.

by Ben Reilly Sat Mar 27, 2021 4:46 pm

Tommy Monk wrote:
Ben Reilly wrote:
Tommy Monk wrote:

Ben, you should listen to Eddie on this one... She's got the right idea!

He said you support Tommy Robinson, do you not?

He said he was my "favourite politician"... Then he said I'd made a £10,000 donation that he'd spent on coke and whores...

I actually think he's an arse, but he was right about the Pakistani Muslim child rape gangs, and about labour govt and councils and other local authorities knowing about it and actively covering it all up.

So why were you so insulted and upset by Andy's comment?

by Tommy Monk Sat Mar 27, 2021 5:01 pm

I wasn't that insulted by it and I certainly wasn't upset...

by Original Quill Sat Mar 27, 2021 5:51 pm

Tommy Monk wrote:National Socialist Party most often refers to the National Socialist German Workers' Party (German: Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei, NSDAP), commonly known as the Nazi Party, which existed in Germany between 1920 and 1945 and ruled the country from 1933 to 1945.

What's in a name? Do you think that the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (N. Korea) is really democratic?

by Tommy Monk Sat Mar 27, 2021 5:59 pm

Yawn...

by Guest Sat Mar 27, 2021 6:03 pm

While their name did include the word “socialist”, their policies and treatment of left-wing opponents show they were not socialists in any meaningful sense.

https://fullfact.org/online/nazis-socialists/

by Tommy Monk Sat Mar 27, 2021 7:10 pm

Full fukked is a bullshit site.

by eddie Sun Mar 28, 2021 2:49 am

Tommy Monk wrote:
eddie wrote:Let us leave it there and get back to the topic, but whilst I’m here, if I see anyone jumping in a thread just to make a snide remark about another poster I’m going to take action.
Post about the topic, not about a fellow poster.

Grow the fuck up.

Ben, you should listen to Eddie on this one... She's got the right idea!

I’m not kidding either. People who just pop in to have a dig about a poster are just low-class-whore-trolls.

I can’t stand that type of behaviour. It’s akin to shit-stirring.

by Ben Reilly Sun Mar 28, 2021 2:54 am

Tommy Monk wrote:

I wasn't that insulted by it and I certainly wasn't upset...

So when you aren't very insulted, and certainly not upset, you retaliate by calling someone a supporter of child rapists and terrorists.

Can you understand how I'm struggling to believe you at this point?

by Ben Reilly Sun Mar 28, 2021 3:10 am

Original Quill wrote:
Tommy Monk wrote:National Socialist Party most often refers to the National Socialist German Workers' Party (German: Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei, NSDAP), commonly known as the Nazi Party, which existed in Germany between 1920 and 1945 and ruled the country from 1933 to 1945.

What's in a name? Do you think that the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (N. Korea) is really democratic?

Oh my God, are you trying to imply that the Patriot Act might not have been patriotic?

No. In this world, everything must surely be exactly what it presents itself as.

by Original Quill Sun Mar 28, 2021 4:34 am

Ben Reilly wrote:
Original Quill wrote:

What's in a name? Do you think that the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (N. Korea) is really democratic?

Oh my God, are you trying to imply that the Patriot Act might not have been patriotic?

No. In this world, everything must surely be exactly what it presents itself as.

...said the Republican National Committee.

False labeling is one of the many lies that charlatans tell. They changed the name to the Department of Defense, yet they haven't had to defend anything since Japan invaded Attu Island, Aleutian Islands, in 1943. Given the many off-shore conflicts the US has been in, it should be named the Department of Offense.

by Tommy Monk Sun Mar 28, 2021 5:42 pm

It wasn't false labeling...

It is false to label the Nazis as anything but far left ..

https://mises.org/library/why-nazism-was-socialism-and-why-socialism-totalitarian

https://mises.org/library/nazism-socialism

That's hardly any form of capitalism now, is it!!!???

Big state, big state control, total control over employment and businesses and means of production... That is definitely left wing...!!!

by Tommy Monk Sun Mar 28, 2021 6:33 pm

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2014/03/13/leftists_become_incandescent_when_reminded_of_the_socialist_roots_in_nazism_121913.html

by gelico Sun Mar 28, 2021 7:21 pm

Ben Reilly wrote:Andy said (correctly) that you like Tommy Robinson.

You "retaliated" by accusing him of supporting child rape and terrorism. And you've refused to apologize.

Two days to think about that in the basement.

Andy said 'Tommy Monk's favourite politician'

it was said in a sneaky snipey fashion with the sole purpose of prodding a reaction. he didn't like the reaction.

considering Andy has never wanted to discuss Islamic rules, jihadi attacks, rapes of young girls, corruptions and cover ups to avoid embarrassing muslims, in all honesty, i don't see it as a bad come back

but we all know how important it is for you to every now and then start waving your dick around to remind us all who is in charge.

personally, I think Andy owes the forum an apology for being unable to post civilly without bad mouthing other posters

but,,,,,,

by Original Quill Sun Mar 28, 2021 7:23 pm

Tommy Monk wrote:

It wasn't false labeling...

It is false to label the Nazis as anything but far left ..

https://mises.org/library/why-nazism-was-socialism-and-why-socialism-totalitarian

https://mises.org/library/nazism-socialism

That's hardly any form of capitalism now, is it!!!???

Big state, big state control, total control over employment and businesses and means of production... That is definitely left wing...!!!

It sure isn't equity.

by Syl Sun Mar 28, 2021 7:44 pm

gelico wrote:
Ben Reilly wrote:Andy said (correctly) that you like Tommy Robinson.

You "retaliated" by accusing him of supporting child rape and terrorism. And you've refused to apologize.

Two days to think about that in the basement.

Andy said 'Tommy Monk's favourite politician'

it was said in a sneaky snipey fashion with the sole purpose of prodding a reaction. he didn't like the reaction.

considering Andy has never wanted to discuss Islamic rules, jihadi attacks, rapes of young girls, corruptions and cover ups to avoid embarrassing muslims, in all honesty, i don't see it as a bad come back

but we all know how important it is for you to every now and then start waving your dick around to remind us all who is in charge.

personally, I think Andy owes the forum an apology for being unable to post civilly without bad mouthing other posters

but,,,,,,

Well said, there are a couple of posters here who seem to only land to cause a bit of trouble....or back each other if they smell blood.
I noticed it in this thread alone, you did, Eddie and Maddog also noticed.

I did agree with Maddog earlier in the thread that Tommy should drop it on this occasion, why should he be banned and give Andy the satisfaction, when tbh, Tommy contributes a lot more to this forum than Andy does.

by Andy Sun Mar 28, 2021 8:17 pm

Syl wrote:
gelico wrote:

Andy said 'Tommy Monk's favourite politician'

it was said in a sneaky snipey fashion with the sole purpose of prodding a reaction. he didn't like the reaction.

considering Andy has never wanted to discuss Islamic rules, jihadi attacks, rapes of young girls, corruptions and cover ups to avoid embarrassing muslims, in all honesty, i don't see it as a bad come back

but we all know how important it is for you to every now and then start waving your dick around to remind us all who is in charge.

personally, I think Andy owes the forum an apology for being unable to post civilly without bad mouthing other posters

but,,,,,,

Well said, there are a couple of posters here who seem to only land to cause a bit of trouble....or back each other if they smell blood.
I noticed it in this thread alone, you did, Eddie and Maddog also noticed.

I did agree with Maddog earlier in the thread that Tommy should drop it on this occasion, why should he be banned and give Andy the satisfaction, when tbh, Tommy contributes a lot more to this forum than Andy does.

And you openly back a racist far right climate change denyer, who boasts about his support for Hitler by using a Hitler cat lookalike as an avatar .
I knew gelico hangs on every utterance from Tommy, but I thought you had more common sense.
How dare you try to turn what I actually said into what you wanted to believe what I said.
What the FUCK I have I got to apologise about?.The forum owner saw , read and understood what was said and took appropriate action.
I posted 1 sentence,which was civil and polite.
The response was grossly offensive and libellous.

by JulesV Sun Mar 28, 2021 8:56 pm

Syl wrote:
gelico wrote:

Andy said 'Tommy Monk's favourite politician'

it was said in a sneaky snipey fashion with the sole purpose of prodding a reaction. he didn't like the reaction.

considering Andy has never wanted to discuss Islamic rules, jihadi attacks, rapes of young girls, corruptions and cover ups to avoid embarrassing muslims, in all honesty, i don't see it as a bad come back

but we all know how important it is for you to every now and then start waving your dick around to remind us all who is in charge.

personally, I think Andy owes the forum an apology for being unable to post civilly without bad mouthing other posters

but,,,,,,

Well said, there are a couple of posters here who seem to only land to cause a bit of trouble....or back each other if they smell blood.
I noticed it in this thread alone, you did, Eddie and Maddog also noticed.

I did agree with Maddog earlier in the thread that Tommy should drop it on this occasion, why should he be banned and give Andy the satisfaction, when tbh, Tommy contributes a lot more to this forum than Andy does.

What trouble? Tommy Robinson denies spending over £400,000 in donations from far-right supporters on drugs, luxuries - Page 2 2190311264

It was nothing. No one died so can you not let it go?

Yes there was a bit of an argument and someone was basemented for a couple of days, that's all. No one died.

You said you were done, so why did you go back on your word and start fighting all over again, Syl? Let it go !

And who are these "couple of posters" who you are being so snide about?

by Syl Sun Mar 28, 2021 11:40 pm

Andy wrote:
Syl wrote:

Well said, there are a couple of posters here who seem to only land to cause a bit of trouble....or back each other if they smell blood.
I noticed it in this thread alone, you did, Eddie and Maddog also noticed.

I did agree with Maddog earlier in the thread that Tommy should drop it on this occasion, why should he be banned and give Andy the satisfaction, when tbh, Tommy contributes a lot more to this forum than Andy does.

And you openly back a racist far right climate change denyer, who boasts about his support for Hitler by using a Hitler cat lookalike as an avatar .
I knew gelico hangs on every utterance from Tommy, but I thought you had more common sense.
How dare you try to turn what I actually said into what you wanted to believe what I said.
What the FUCK I have I got to apologise about?.The forum owner saw , read and understood what was said and took appropriate action.
I posted 1 sentence,which was civil and polite.
The response was grossly offensive and libellous.

Oh grow up.

I argue with Tommy's views as often as anyone else does on here, the difference between you and me, and your clingon that has miraculously appeared to try and put the boot in a bit more, is I dont attack him personally.

I dont have to twist what was said, you entered this thread.....and plenty others, just to have a snide dig.
Tommy often ignores your goading, this time he didn't, he did respond, ......and haven't you made the most of that? Rolling Eyes

by JulesV Mon Mar 29, 2021 12:27 am

Syl wrote:
Andy wrote:

And you openly back a racist far right climate change denyer, who boasts about his support for Hitler by using a Hitler cat lookalike as an avatar .
I knew gelico hangs on every utterance from Tommy, but I thought you had more common sense.
How dare you try to turn what I actually said into what you wanted to believe what I said.
What the FUCK I have I got to apologise about?.The forum owner saw , read and understood what was said and took appropriate action.
I posted 1 sentence,which was civil and polite.
The response was grossly offensive and libellous.
Oh grow up.

I argue with Tommy's views as often as anyone else does on here, the difference between you and me, and your clingon that has miraculously appeared to try and put the boot in a bit more, is I dont attack him personally.

I dont have to twist what was said, you entered this thread.....and plenty others, just to have a snide dig.
Tommy often ignores your goading, this time he didn't, he did respond, ......and haven't you made the most of that?

"Miraculously"?? Haha the only 'miracle' which enables me to appear on here is something quaint called a password. Tommy Robinson denies spending over £400,000 in donations from far-right supporters on drugs, luxuries - Page 2 2190311264

If YOU know of any miraculous methods like a wizard's wand or a magic carpet, pls let me know.... cos it sounds more fun. Tommy Robinson denies spending over £400,000 in donations from far-right supporters on drugs, luxuries - Page 2 3489511464

Tommy Robinson denies spending over £400,000 in donations from far-right supporters on drugs, luxuries - Page 2 3489511464

Your blind spot conveniently missed the fact that others jumped into this thread to make posts which contributed nothing to the topic. At least I posted a bit on topic.

As for clingon accusations- I don't think Andy's wife wants to read that anyone is clinging on to him, so please let's steer clear of such libellous careless talk. Cool

by Syl Mon Mar 29, 2021 1:17 am

JulesV wrote:
Syl wrote:
Oh grow up.

I argue with Tommy's views as often as anyone else does on here, the difference between you and me, and your clingon that has miraculously appeared to try and put the boot in a bit more, is I dont attack him personally.

I dont have to twist what was said, you entered this thread.....and plenty others, just to have a snide dig.
Tommy often ignores your goading, this time he didn't, he did respond, ......and haven't you made the most of that?

"Miraculously"?? Haha the only 'miracle' which enables me to appear on here is something quaint called a password.

If YOU know of any miraculous methods like a wizard's wand or a magic carpet, pls let me know.... cos it sounds more fun.

Your blind spot conveniently missed the fact that others jumped into this thread to make posts which contributed nothing to the topic. At least I posted a bit on topic.

As for clingon accusations- I don't think Andy's wife wants to read that anyone is clinging on to him, so please let's steer clear of such libellous careless talk.

Tommy Robinson denies spending over £400,000 in donations from far-right supporters on drugs, luxuries - Page 2 16169710

by Guest Mon Mar 29, 2021 7:39 am

Just a quick question as i have perhaps "Miraculously" re appeared and am a friend of Andys and found tommys accusations beyond the pale ,and believe i said so

would that be ME ????

a simple yes/no will suffice

And although i have had him on block for some time and hardly comment to him or ever direct personal abuse at him i have Zero problem "Miraculously" disappearing again

by Andy Mon Mar 29, 2021 8:31 am

Thanks, KD. Like many, I am unsure that labelling a poster with a Hitler cat avatar a Tommy Robinson fan merits a grotesque and libellous response.
His forum friends appear to be as snowflake as Tommy.
If memory serves me correctly, his avatar was a picture of Hitler before the forum admins ordered him to change it (he took the piss out of admin with his new one).

by JulesV Mon Mar 29, 2021 9:34 am

Good Morning everyone!

Tommy Robinson denies spending over £400,000 in donations from far-right supporters on drugs, luxuries - Page 2 Happym10

Do you guys think there will now be a power struggle and Robinson will be replaced?

I mean, he has turned into a boring one trick pony.

Which is great news for his foes, but bad news for his ragtag army.

by Andy Mon Mar 29, 2021 9:56 am

Robinson has spent almost as much time in prison in the past 10years as he has put. His list of criminal convictions is very lengthy.Should he even be allowed to run a political party?

by Syl Mon Mar 29, 2021 11:55 am

Korben wrote:Just a quick question as i have perhaps "Miraculously" re appeared and am a friend of Andys and found tommys accusations beyond the pale ,and believe i said so

would that be ME ????

a simple yes/no will suffice

And although i have had him on block for some time and hardly comment to him or ever direct personal abuse at him i have Zero problem "Miraculously" disappearing again

A resounding NO from me.

You may not like him (so what?) but you certainly don't enter any thread just to goad. You have your opposing opinions and you stick to them, so if you think I was meaning you who 'miraculously appears' just to stick the boot in....I definitely didn't.

I think it's clear who I meant, and if it wasn't, it was JULES, doing what she does best.

by Syl Mon Mar 29, 2021 11:57 am

That said....I echo the Good Morning to everyone, have a nice day. Tommy Robinson denies spending over £400,000 in donations from far-right supporters on drugs, luxuries - Page 2 2385359624

Tommy Robinson denies spending over £400,000 in donations from far-right supporters on drugs, luxuries - Page 2 2385359624

by Guest Mon Mar 29, 2021 12:08 pm

Syl wrote:
Korben wrote:Just a quick question as i have perhaps "Miraculously" re appeared and am a friend of Andys and found tommys accusations beyond the pale ,and believe i said so

would that be ME ????

a simple yes/no will suffice

And although i have had him on block for some time and hardly comment to him or ever direct personal abuse at him i have Zero problem "Miraculously" disappearing again

A resounding NO from me.

You may not like him (so what?) but you certainly don't enter any thread just to goad. You have your opposing opinions and you stick to them, so if you think I was meaning you who 'miraculously appears' just to stick the boot in....I definitely didn't.

I think it's clear who I meant, and if it wasn't, it was JULES, doing what she does best.

I was unsure hence my question,as i have not been a member for 6 years i am unaware of others actions or posts ,or how often they "Miraculously" appear
In fact because i had only recently re joined it was the "Miraculously" that confused me

but thanks for clearing that up

Carry on

by Syl Mon Mar 29, 2021 12:18 pm

Korben wrote:
Syl wrote:

A resounding NO from me.

You may not like him (so what?) but you certainly don't enter any thread just to goad. You have your opposing opinions and you stick to them, so if you think I was meaning you who 'miraculously appears' just to stick the boot in....I definitely didn't.

I think it's clear who I meant, and if it wasn't, it was JULES, doing what she does best.

I was unsure hence my question,as i have not been a member for 6 years i am unaware of others actions or posts ,or how often they "Miraculously" appear
In fact because i had only recently re joined it was the "Miraculously" that confused me

but thanks for clearing that up

Carry on

I wont carry it on now Korben, as far as I am concerned I said my bit last night, I just wanted to answer what you asked.....and make it clear I did not mean you.

I know you left in the past, I think I had only just joined, I gather forums got a bit heavy for you back then, and personally I think it's great you have come back.

by Guest Mon Mar 29, 2021 12:30 pm

Syl wrote:
Korben wrote:
I was unsure hence my question,as i have not been a member for 6 years i am unaware of others actions or posts ,or how often they "Miraculously" appear
In fact because i had only recently re joined it was the "Miraculously" that confused me

but thanks for clearing that up

Carry on

I wont carry it on now Korben, as far as I am concerned I said my bit last night, I just wanted to answer what you asked.....and make it clear I did not mean you.

I know you left in the past, I think I had only just joined, I gather forums got a bit heavy for you back then, and personally I think it's great you have come back.

You misunderstand "carry on "wasn't a invitation to keep it going
its a (or was meant as )military term indicating answer excepted
Carry on doing what you feel is correct

by Sponsored content