did anyone see Nigel farage's hand gun idea?

Brutus wrote:Guns are penis substitutes.
Anyone who 'loves' a gun is insecure about his penis, whether it is big enough, gets enough action or fires blanks.
Real men don't need a gun to impress the ladies, who I think are more impressed by the guys mind first, his decency second then what's  in his pants and how he uses it.

Not by blokes shouting " I've  got a big weapon and I'm  not afraid to use it".

Cass wrote:

Maddog wrote:

I'm not horrified.

But I don't get horrified at much.  

We have had insane runs on ammo, not just toilet paper.  

Probably be some good deals on guns in a few weeks if the economy keeps tanking. While some will want to hold on to all of them, many will want to unload a few to pay some bills.

Drove out to the country a few weeks ago to ride my bike. Saw a guy selling a few shotguns along side the road.  That would horrify the hoplophobes.  

You and I will never see eye to eye on this issue it that’s ok.

Andy wrote:Just saw Didge mention me. Dont sweat it, Brutus, Didge/Thorin is stark raving mad, a psychotic, alcoholic , obsessive egomanisc. He has  to have the last word and sulks and flies off in a huff when he loses,.
If he thinks we are the same, that is a badge of honour, not an insult.
He was 1 of the far right gang that made me retire from here , better things to spend my time  doing than read lunatic rants s from him and his ilk.

Original Quill wrote:

Brutus wrote:Guns are penis substitutes.
Anyone who 'loves' a gun is insecure about his penis, whether it is big enough, gets enough action or fires blanks.
Real men don't need a gun to impress the ladies, who I think are more impressed by the guys mind first, his decency second then what's  in his pants and how he uses it.

Not by blokes shouting " I've  got a big weapon and I'm  not afraid to use it".

The Penis analogy is not about impressing women.  It's competitive in it's own right.  

As Dylann Roof said while shooting black parishioners in Charleston, South Carolina, "You rape our women and are taking over our nation."  It needs no outside reference to pleasure or superior performance.  It's a mano-y-mano comparison of who has the inferior organ.  It's more about loss of power and ineffectiveness.  The firearm compensates for feeling inadequate.

Brutus wrote:Guns are penis substitutes.
Anyone who 'loves' a gun is insecure about his penis, whether it is big enough, gets enough action or fires blanks.
Real men don't need a gun to impress the ladies, who I think are more impressed by the guys mind first, his decency second then what's  in his pants and how he uses it.

Not by blokes shouting " I've  got a big weapon and I'm  not afraid to use it".

Maddog wrote:

Brutus wrote:Guns are penis substitutes.
Anyone who 'loves' a gun is insecure about his penis, whether it is big enough, gets enough action or fires blanks.
Real men don't need a gun to impress the ladies, who I think are more impressed by the guys mind first, his decency second then what's  in his pants and how he uses it.

Not by blokes shouting " I've  got a big weapon and I'm  not afraid to use it".

Are you so threatened by women that you cant see them wanting to use firearms?

My daughters are all very proficient with firearms and live in homes with quite a few.  

They are not insecure about their penises.  

Maddog wrote:

No doubt these ladies wish they had a big penis like Brutus.  

Thorin wrote:

Brutus wrote:Nowhere near as sick as you, evidently.
I'm off to my back garden. Grass to be cut, flowers to plant, the sun is shining, birds are singing.
That is far better than listening to you drone on against every topic that goes against alt right wing, Conservative  and Repubican principles.

No worries andy, but stop hiding behind a different persona

There is nothing sick with people having guns for sport and hunting

You were the one that insulted a number of posters here and claimed they were insecure simple for owning guns

It has nothing to do with any politics here in that regard

So when you apologise to the posters that do own guns, who have never murdered anyone or killed people whilst owning their guns. You may come to understand how and why you are the twat here

eddie wrote:Guns are for idiots, police, or people who hunt for food.

That is all.

Ben Reilly wrote:Have to say, I surprise some people since I'm a lefty who has owned guns (sold my last one because I needed the cash) and I support responsible gun ownership. I think there are plenty of other lefties like me, but whatever.

There is something pretty cool about taking your gun down to the range and putting holes in paper. It's a frisson that few non-sexual situations can match

My problem is with people who seem obsessed with guns, but at the same time, I have a problem with people who seem obsessed with most things.

Maddog wrote:

eddie wrote:Guns are for idiots, police, or people who hunt for food.

That is all.

Are you hounding me.

eddie wrote:

Maddog wrote:

Are you hounding me.

Not unless you are an idiot with a gun?

Cass wrote:

Eilzel wrote:I see no good reason to make gun ownership easier in the UK. I see no good coming from more people having guns in their possession.

Correct.

It’s been horrifying here that gun shops are considered an essential business and are now allowing “drive thru” options. In some cases they haven’t even RELAXED some of the regulations. Add that to how much ammunition has been purchased since the rise of COVID-19 and the statements made by local zealots on Facebook groups about being happy it is “hunting” season as a euphemism for shooting people is insanely scary. That’s the reality of living here.

Original Quill wrote:

Cass wrote:

Correct.

It’s been horrifying here that gun shops are considered an essential business and are now allowing “drive thru” options. In some cases they haven’t even RELAXED some of the regulations. Add that to how much ammunition has been purchased since the rise of COVID-19 and the statements made by local zealots on Facebook groups about being happy it is “hunting” season as a euphemism for shooting people is insanely scary. That’s the reality of living here.

Arizona is the highest gun ownership per capita of any state in the union.  It's no surprise that, if gun-buying is high, it would be high in Arizona.  But I don't get the connection between closures and firearm acquisition.  Are they planning bank robberies, or suicides?

Original Quill wrote:

Cass wrote:

Correct.

It’s been horrifying here that gun shops are considered an essential business and are now allowing “drive thru” options. In some cases they haven’t even RELAXED some of the regulations. Add that to how much ammunition has been purchased since the rise of COVID-19 and the statements made by local zealots on Facebook groups about being happy it is “hunting” season as a euphemism for shooting people is insanely scary. That’s the reality of living here.

Arizona is the highest gun ownership per capita of any state in the union.  It's no surprise that, if gun-buying is high, it would be high in Arizona.  But I don't get the connection between closures and firearm acquisition.  Are they planning bank robberies, or suicides?

inmyopinion wrote:

Original Quill wrote:

Arizona is the highest gun ownership per capita of any state in the union.  It's no surprise that, if gun-buying is high, it would be high in Arizona.  But I don't get the connection between closures and firearm acquisition.  Are they planning bank robberies, or suicides?

The connection between lock down and toilet rolls has me totally baffled.

inmyopinion wrote:

Original Quill wrote:

Arizona is the highest gun ownership per capita of any state in the union.  It's no surprise that, if gun-buying is high, it would be high in Arizona.  But I don't get the connection between closures and firearm acquisition.  Are they planning bank robberies, or suicides?

The connection between lock down and toilet rolls has me totally baffled.