Final round!! Speaker....

Ok folks, the polls have closed...

We have a 3 way final...

The winner of this final will be presented before Ben by myself   and with his permission , the winner of the final shall be sworn in as speaker of the political discussions.

We have in the finals ....

Eddie who scored 5 votes
Edmund who scored 5 votes
Eilzel who scored 7votes


..Second place will be deputy speaker folks, as said earlier on!

Poll will,close this time tomorrow!..

Good luck finalists! 

What's this man?...the three 'E 's on tour!!  

This is exciting, good luck everyone! :D

Joy Division wrote:What's this man?...the three 'E 's on tour!!  

A very hush hush suggestion - out of the public domain



You insist on all three standing on soap boxes and wooing us with their mantras.

gerber wrote:

Joy Division wrote:What's this man?...the three 'E 's on tour!!  

A very hush hush suggestion - out of the public domain



You insist on all three standing on soap boxes and wooing us with their mantras.

  

..I wouldn't dream of it , they can stand in puddles for all I care!  

Ben_Reilly wrote:This is exciting, good luck everyone! :D

...nice one Ben  :D 

Joy Division wrote:

gerber wrote:

A very hush hush suggestion - out of the public domain



You insist on all three standing on soap boxes and wooing us with their mantras.

  

..I wouldn't dream of it , they can stand in puddles for all I care!  

Even better sport................... Will show what they are made of...

Erm can I just say....I am really crap at political stuff?
I mean, I know Cameron chappie is PM and the Egg bloke is erm, his better half.....but I am useless at politics.

Les and Lord ed would be better, they know their stuff.

gerber wrote:

Joy Division wrote:

  

..I wouldn't dream of it , they can stand in puddles for all I care!  

Even better sport...................  Will show what they are made of...

Indeed for we are made up much of water anyway!

I'll be going for Edmund in this one...mainly because of his political knowledge  :D 

eddie wrote:Erm can I just say....I am really crap at political stuff?
I mean, I know Cameron chappie is PM and the Egg bloke is erm, his better half.....but I am useless at politics.

Les and Lord ed would be better, they know their stuff.

Sure it would help lots of one is politically savvy minded, but just as important to keep order and so on.

I must always emphasise ....


THIS JOB ENTAILS THE SPEAKER TO BE UNBIASED AND ALWAYS HEAR EVERY SIDE OF AN ARGUMENT/DEBATE.

I say this to all finalists amd none in particular , and I'm sure those finalists would all demonstrate a good ability to remain truthful,yet unbiased.

Regards, JD

Joy Division wrote:I must always emphasise ....


THIS JOB ENTAILS THE SPEAKER TO BE UNBIASED AND ALWAYS HEAR EVERY SIDE OF AN ARGUMENT/DEBATE.

I say this to all finalists amd none in particular , and I'm sure those finalists would all demonstrate a good ability to remain truthful,yet unbiased.

Regards, JD

Ah see now I am at a disadvantage.
I might get PMT  ::hdintowll:: 

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

eddie wrote:

Joy Division wrote:I must always emphasise ....


THIS JOB ENTAILS THE SPEAKER TO BE UNBIASED AND ALWAYS HEAR EVERY SIDE OF AN ARGUMENT/DEBATE.

I say this to all finalists amd none in particular , and I'm sure those finalists would all demonstrate a good ability to remain truthful,yet unbiased.

Regards, JD

Ah see now I am at a disadvantage.
I might get PMT  ::hdintowll:: 

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

 

Joy Division wrote:I must always emphasise ....


THIS JOB ENTAILS THE SPEAKER TO BE UNBIASED AND ALWAYS HEAR EVERY SIDE OF AN ARGUMENT/DEBATE.

I say this to all finalists amd none in particular , and I'm sure those finalists would all demonstrate a good ability to remain truthful,yet unbiased.

Regards, JD

Without any favour or fervour...........................

I will vouch for edds................... her ears are always to the ground............ could tell you when Kanga walked in Sydney................ hears everything......

No bias guys..........you would all be supremely good.

maybe other roles could be assigned to you...

Elijah........................ Black rod

M'Lord your rightful place is on the Woolsack.................. Presiding over all

gerber wrote:

Joy Division wrote:I must always emphasise ....


THIS JOB ENTAILS THE SPEAKER TO BE UNBIASED AND ALWAYS HEAR EVERY SIDE OF AN ARGUMENT/DEBATE.

I say this to all finalists amd none in particular , and I'm sure those finalists would all demonstrate a good ability to remain truthful,yet unbiased.

Regards, JD

Without any favour or fervour...........................

I will vouch for edds...................  her ears are always to the ground............ could tell you when Kanga walked in Sydney................  hears everything......

No bias guys..........you would all be supremely good.

maybe other roles could be assigned to you...

Elijah........................  Black rod

M'Lord your rightful place is on the Woolsack..................  Presiding over all

Actually I forgot too mention for a while that second place will be deputy speaker !

I did say this earlier!

Joy Division wrote:

gerber wrote:

Without any favour or fervour...........................

I will vouch for edds...................  her ears are always to the ground............ could tell you when Kanga walked in Sydney................  hears everything......

No bias guys..........you would all be supremely good.

maybe other roles could be assigned to you...

Elijah........................  Black rod

M'Lord your rightful place is on the Woolsack..................  Presiding over all

Actually I forgot too mention for a while that second place will be deputy speaker !

I did say this earlier!

If you did I missed it, apologies...................why not go the whole hog and have two deputy speakers......

They all deserve the post.

gerber wrote:

Joy Division wrote:I must always emphasise ....


THIS JOB ENTAILS THE SPEAKER TO BE UNBIASED AND ALWAYS HEAR EVERY SIDE OF AN ARGUMENT/DEBATE.

I say this to all finalists amd none in particular , and I'm sure those finalists would all demonstrate a good ability to remain truthful,yet unbiased.

Regards, JD

Without any favour or fervour...........................

I will vouch for edds...................  her ears are always to the ground............ could tell you when Kanga walked in Sydney................  hears everything......

No bias guys..........you would all be supremely good.

maybe other roles could be assigned to you...

Elijah........................  Black rod

M'Lord your rightful place is on the Woolsack..................  Presiding over all

Yep I can hear that Kanga now......I think? Might be your Ewine Gerbs....

gerber wrote:

Joy Division wrote:


Actually I forgot too mention for a while that second place will be deputy speaker !

I did say this earlier!

If you did I missed it, apologies...................why not go the whole hog and have two deputy speakers......

They all deserve the post.

...I know , your right, but this was always just a two person post as advertised!!

They do all deserve , but it would also take the sting and curiosity from the final!!

eddie wrote:

gerber wrote:

Without any favour or fervour...........................

I will vouch for edds...................  her ears are always to the ground............ could tell you when Kanga walked in Sydney................  hears everything......

No bias guys..........you would all be supremely good.

maybe other roles could be assigned to you...

Elijah........................  Black rod

M'Lord your rightful place is on the Woolsack..................  Presiding over all

Yep I can hear that Kanga now......I think? Might be your Ewine Gerbs....

Oooch


Wonderfull......................... Brilliant more laughs........... Humph left room amazed Mummy is laughing cannot recognise the noise,,,,,,,,,, has RSPCA mobile No. on his collar so will be calling them soon as he needs support.....

gerber wrote:

Joy Division wrote:


Actually I forgot too mention for a while that second place will be deputy speaker !

I did say this earlier!

If you did I missed it, apologies...................why not go the whole hog and have two deputy speakers......

They all deserve the post.

No worries Gerbs, you've nothing to apologise for  :D

Joy Division wrote:

gerber wrote:

If you did I missed it, apologies...................why not go the whole hog and have two deputy speakers......

They all deserve the post.

...I know , your right, but this was always just a two person post as advertised!!

They do all deserve , but it would also take the sting and curiosity from the final!!

Be Boss man, take control make decisions.................. Join not divide ( Joy Division becomes Joy Decision )

gerber wrote:

Joy Division wrote:

...I know , your right, but this was always just a two person post as advertised!!

They do all deserve , but it would also take the sting and curiosity from the final!!

Be Boss man, take control make decisions..................  Join not divide ( Joy Division becomes Joy Decision )

That's a bit strange as the more I've aged, the harder many decisions are to make!

Ben_Reilly wrote:This is exciting, good luck everyone! :D

I honestly and sincerely think Eilzel and Lord Ed should do it.
I know nothing about politics!

Just let them do it Ben. I'll sweep up or something.

Final pitch for Eddie

Betty Boothroyd was the best speaker the HOC has had in recent times. Most derided her when the votes were cast but within days she had won the hearts and more importantly the minds of those who voted against her, why............. because Betty was true to her post, she acknowledged the responsibility of neutrality, something the Conservatives said would never happen. Betty ensured the HOC once again became the place of democracy. She was fiery, quick witted, respectful but at the end of the day took control without any animosity.

IMO

There is our Edds........

Sorry guys..............please don't take this as a personal dump towards you...........

To help qualify my deranged wafflings


I am a true blue Conservative, always have been might still be....... But if Claire Short had been my MP I would have voted for her as I would have for Tony Benn

eddie wrote:

Ben_Reilly wrote:This is exciting, good luck everyone! :D

I honestly and sincerely think Eilzel and Lord Ed should do it.
I know nothing about politics!

Just let them do it Ben. I'll sweep up or something.

I will mount the peasants revolt, the great man Wat Tyler...Moletrousers, he will never lord it over me!

The Turd.

eddie wrote:

Ben_Reilly wrote:This is exciting, good luck everyone! :D

I honestly and sincerely think Eilzel and Lord Ed should do it.
I know nothing about politics!

Just let them do it Ben. I'll sweep up or something.

Come on Eddie, where's yer spirit?, you can be neutral can't you?, unbiased? Of course! And hear all sides of an argument ?

Of course you can, get in there!

Tally bloody ho!

gerber wrote:Final pitch for Eddie

Betty Boothroyd was the best speaker the HOC has had in recent times.  Most derided her when the votes were cast but within days she had won the hearts and more importantly the minds of those who voted against her, why.............  because  Betty was true to her post, she acknowledged the responsibility of neutrality, something the Conservatives said would never happen.  Betty ensured the HOC once again became the place of democracy.  She was fiery, quick witted, respectful but at the end of the day took control without any animosity.

IMO

There is our Edds........

Sorry guys..............please don't take this as a personal dump towards you...........

To help qualify my deranged wafflings


I am a true blue Conservative, always have been might still be....... But if Claire Short had been my MP I would have voted for her as I would have for Tony Benn

I remember BB Gerbs, but was younger back then and never paid much attention , loved by many is the picture I get though.

  

Catman wrote:Tally bloody ho!

   

Wassup Phil?!!! :D 

Are you voting for any of our finalists then Phil?

You don't have to say!!  

Joy Division wrote:

Catman wrote:Tally bloody ho!

   

Wassup  Phil?!!! :D 

Are you voting for any of our finalists then Phil?

You don't have to say!!  

I have been voting, i have voted for Scrat, Eddie & Les!   

 

THIS farce wasn't really necessary, JD...

You simply had to declare Elizel the "winner" ~ and then had a "runoff" for the Deputy's position..

AS FOR 5 people voting for Eddie in the first round ~ that simply goes to prove that there were at least 4 other idiots present on the day !

Beekeeper wrote: 

THIS farce wasn't really necessary, JD...

You simply had to declare Elizel the "winner" ~ and then had a "runoff" for the Deputy's position..

AS FOR 5 people voting for Eddie in the first round ~ that simply goes to prove that there were at least 4 other idiots present on the day !

Got a problem with women haven't you?

Tess. wrote:

Beekeeper wrote: 

THIS farce wasn't really necessary, JD...

You simply had to declare Elizel the "winner" ~ and then had a "runoff" for the Deputy's position..

AS FOR 5 people voting for Eddie in the first round ~ that simply goes to prove that there were at least 4 other idiots present on the day !

Got a problem with women haven't you?

I think Beekeeper got a problem with people with brains rather than women.

Joy Division wrote:

eddie wrote:

I honestly and sincerely think Eilzel and Lord Ed should do it.
I know nothing about politics!

Just let them do it Ben. I'll sweep up or something.

Come on Eddie, where's yer  spirit?, you  can be neutral can't you?, unbiased? Of course! And hear all sides of an argument ?

Of course you can, get in there!

I thought you had to know about polidicks?

eddie wrote:

Joy Division wrote:


Come on Eddie, where's yer  spirit?, you  can be neutral can't you?, unbiased? Of course! And hear all sides of an argument ?

Of course you can, get in there!

I thought  you had to know about polidicks?

..it's not imperative for on here!!, it just helps Eds.

Whereas knowledge do dicks is paramount !!  

Beekeeper wrote: 

THIS farce wasn't really necessary, JD...

You simply had to declare Elizel the "winner" ~ and then had a "runoff" for the Deputy's position..

AS FOR 5 people voting for Eddie in the first round ~ that simply goes to prove that there were at least 4 other idiots present on the day !

Fcuk sake Bee, calm down, it's mostly just fun!

And the latter of you're comment is quite uncalled for Bee.

Catman wrote:

Joy Division wrote:


   

Wassup  Phil?!!! :D 

Are you voting for any of our finalists then Phil?

You don't have to say!!  

I have been voting, i have voted for Scrat, Eddie & Les!   

...nice one Phil, I voted Eddie earlier round  :D 

Tess. wrote:

Beekeeper wrote: 

THIS farce wasn't really necessary, JD...

You simply had to declare Elizel the "winner" ~ and then had a "runoff" for the Deputy's position..

AS FOR 5 people voting for Eddie in the first round ~ that simply goes to prove that there were at least 4 other idiots present on the day !

Got a problem with women haven't you?

  

GO soak your head, you dopey little 'IAF' troll...

56kevins wrote:

Tess. wrote:
Got a problem with women haven't you?

I think Beekeeper got a problem with people with brains rather than women.

  

AS MY I.Q. is easily double that of your smartest 'IAF' troll, 56' , I have no idea how you could possibly have come to such a strange conclusion...

Though, of course, IF you yourself had a brain, then you may have had an argument, as well !

Beekeeper wrote:

56kevins wrote:

I think Beekeeper got a problem with people with brains rather than women.

  

AS MY I.Q. is easily double that of your smartest 'IAF' troll, 56' , I have no idea how you could possibly have come to such a strange conclusion...

Though, of course, IF you yourself had a brain, then you may have had an argument, as well !

They really do lower the tone of the place, the IAF scumbags.

Catman wrote:

Beekeeper wrote:
  

AS MY I.Q. is easily double that of your smartest 'IAF' troll, 56' , I have no idea how you could possibly have come to such a strange conclusion...

Though, of course, IF you yourself had a brain, then you may have had an argument, as well !

They really do lower the tone of the place, the UAF scumbags.

I couldn't agree more, Mr Catman.

BigAndy9 wrote:

Catman wrote:


They really do lower the tone of the place, the UAF scumbags.

I couldn't agree more, Mr Catman.

IAF=IN A FLAP

Catman wrote:

BigAndy9 wrote:

I couldn't agree more, Mr Catman.

IAF=IN A FLAP

I thought in the interests of peace and harmony we were leaving in a flap on in a flap?

NemsAgain wrote:

Catman wrote:


IAF=IN A FLAP

I thought in the interests of peace and harmony we were leaving in a flap on in a flap?

Well said nems.

In fairness to Mr Catman - he was just responding to a Bee sting.

NemsAgain wrote:

Catman wrote:


IAF=IN A FLAP

I thought in the interests of peace and harmony we were leaving in a flap on in a flap?

Fuck off Nems, there's a good girl.

Beekeeper wrote:

56kevins wrote:

I think Beekeeper got a problem with people with brains rather than women.

  

AS MY I.Q. is easily double that of your smartest 'IAF' troll, 56' , I have no idea how you could possibly have come to such a strange conclusion...

Though, of course, IF you yourself had a brain, then you may have had an argument, as well !

If you have a brain, which I doubt, you manage to hide it well. Antipodean stealth technology perhaps.

Hi Kevin

Good to see you on board, hope you are well

PhilDidge wrote:Hi Kevin

Good to see you on board, hope you are well

Ah someone remembers me. I wondered when they would. Are you still fighting both sides?

Beekeeper wrote:

Tess. wrote:

Got a problem with women haven't you?

  

GO soak your head, you dopey little 'IAF' troll...

Yes it's easy to tell you have double the IQ of the other posters.  :<:i}: