White Chicks With Small Hands

BigAndy9 wrote:Surely the Chief Constable should have given them the option of one of these:





"choose your favourite colour, dear"

heavenly father wrote:a waste of time money and effort, the judge should be shot for agreeing with them.

BigAndy9 wrote:

heavenly father wrote:a waste of time money and effort, the judge should be shot for agreeing with them.

And make it a man doin the shootin - we wanna make sure they actually hit the daft old git!

nicko wrote:they could of offered them .38 revolvers they would fit perfectly. when was the last time a woman firearms officer fired a gun in anger?

nicko wrote:from what I know fire arms officers are told to shoot at the torso,to kill. it looks like she missed her target and only wounded.

NemsAgain wrote:

nicko wrote:they could of offered them .38 revolvers they would fit perfectly. when was the last time a woman firearms officer fired a gun in anger?

22nd May 2013 Woowich.

BigAndy9 wrote:What this will mean is £millions spent on new body armour and weapons - a good range too, to fit every womans shape and size.

Gone are the days when the Chief could bring one of the boys in to his office and tell him he's a fat b4st4rd so is coming back in to the office.

Ben_Reilly wrote:What kind of idiotic organization hires female officers and doesn't provide equipment in their size?

WASHINGTON (AP) — Throughout history, military gear has been made with the male physique in mind. But for women in today’s combat or close-to-combat jobs, that can mean body armor that fits so poorly it’s tough to fire a weapon, combat uniforms with knee pads that hit around mid-shin and flight suits that make it nearly impossible to urinate while in a plane.

With women taking on new roles, the issue is getting fresh attention from the military.

Seven hundred female Army troops are testing a new combat uniform for women with shorter sleeves and with knee pads in the right place for their generally shorter legs. A committee on women’s issues has recommended that flight suits be redesigned for both men and women so it’s unnecessary to disrobe before urinating. And engineers have been looking at ways to design armor that better fits the contours of a woman’s body.

Some military women are reluctant to embrace changes that would set them apart from their male colleagues, but several said in interviews that the changes beat the consequences of the current one-piece flight suits or being unable to engage in battle or defend themselves because of uncooperative gear.

Female troops are about 20 percent more likely than their male counterparts to report musculoskeletal disorders, and poorly fitting body armor could be a factor. For female aviators, dehydration can be a hazard if they opt not to drink water before flights, and those who wait too long to use the bathroom can experience urinary problems.

Some of the challenges for women came up in focus groups conducted with both male and female service members. A majority of them reported that equipment given to females was inadequate, “including, but not limited to poor quality or outdated equipment, lack of necessary equipment, tardy issue of equipment and equipment not sized or designed for women,” according to a 2009 report by the Defense Department Advisory Committee on Women in the Services.

Ben_Reilly wrote:What kind of idiotic organization hires female officers and doesn't provide equipment in their size?

nicko wrote:they could of offered them .38 revolvers they would fit perfectly. when was the last time a woman firearms officer fired a gun in anger?

BigAndy9 wrote:Surely the Chief Constable should have given them the option of one of these:





"choose your favourite colour, dear"

Puriel wrote:

just did a google search for white chicks with small hands and black chicks with big Dicks came up.
one of the dangers of tinternet.