Judge acquits man of controlling behaviour because his partner was too strong and capable to be affected.
+5
Raggamuffin
Original Quill
magica
nicko
Syl
9 posters
Page 5 of 9
Page 5 of 9 • 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
Judge acquits man of controlling behaviour because his partner was too strong and capable to be affected.
First topic message reminder :
CAMPAIGNERS blasted a judge after she acquitted a boyfriend of controlling behaviour - because his ex was too "strong and capable" to be considered a victim.
The second female judge this week who seems clueless in regard to crimes against women.
Paul Measor taught their one year old son to tell his mum to Fuck off, and encouraged the tot to call her a slut and a slag.
He subjected Lauren Smith to daily abuse, both physical and mental, which included spitting in her face.
District judge Helen Cousins decided because his victim was a " strong and capable" woman this didnt have enough effect on her to warrant finding him guilty of using controlling and coercive behaviour.
He was convicted of common assault and sentenced to 5 months in prison.
Do these judges not live in the real world?
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/7808081/abusive-boyfriend-girlfriend-too-strong/
CAMPAIGNERS blasted a judge after she acquitted a boyfriend of controlling behaviour - because his ex was too "strong and capable" to be considered a victim.
The second female judge this week who seems clueless in regard to crimes against women.
Paul Measor taught their one year old son to tell his mum to Fuck off, and encouraged the tot to call her a slut and a slag.
He subjected Lauren Smith to daily abuse, both physical and mental, which included spitting in her face.
District judge Helen Cousins decided because his victim was a " strong and capable" woman this didnt have enough effect on her to warrant finding him guilty of using controlling and coercive behaviour.
He was convicted of common assault and sentenced to 5 months in prison.
Do these judges not live in the real world?
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/7808081/abusive-boyfriend-girlfriend-too-strong/
Syl- Forum Detective ????♀️
- Posts : 23619
Join date : 2015-11-12
Re: Judge acquits man of controlling behaviour because his partner was too strong and capable to be affected.
Raggamuffin wrote:gelico wrote:
if that's the best didge's imagination can come up with then i'm sorely disappointed, that's what
I haven't worn plimsolls for years, and certainly not in the presence of Tommy Robinson.
Show me once where Gelico condemned the warped views of Rags?
Never happened
Guest- Guest
Re: Judge acquits man of controlling behaviour because his partner was too strong and capable to be affected.
Oh and for the record, Gelico is not original, but adores Tommy Robinson
Come on woman, get a grip, think for yourself. I am a football thug and so is he
You want to follow that
Come on woman, get a grip, think for yourself. I am a football thug and so is he
You want to follow that
Last edited by Thor on Sat Nov 24, 2018 12:19 am; edited 1 time in total
Guest- Guest
Re: Judge acquits man of controlling behaviour because his partner was too strong and capable to be affected.
Thor wrote:gelico wrote:
aw poor didge, still screaming for attention, well ok, since i'm in such a good mood i'll play nicely with you
How is telling and teaching a child a toddler, that her mother is a slag and slut okay?
It isn't
Is that not child abuse?
yes
there you go, poppet, you got your answer
all better now?
You are past your sell by date
See how nasty that is?
demanding answers was why i said you are screaming for attention, well you got it so you should be happy
if you want to be nasty is entirely your own affair, it's hardly likely to affect my life so feel free to say what you like
and you tell me to grow up
you're so cute didge
Guest- Guest
Re: Judge acquits man of controlling behaviour because his partner was too strong and capable to be affected.
gelico wrote:Thor wrote:
You are past your sell by date
See how nasty that is?
demanding answers was why i said you are screaming for attention, well you got it so you should be happy
if you want to be nasty is entirely your own affair, it's hardly likely to affect my life so feel free to say what you like
and you tell me to grow up
you're so cute didge
Show me at what point id I point a sword to your neck and demand an answer?
never happened
So you had to lie yet again
Why?
Is it becuase I am making you look stupid?
I was never being nasty, but exposing you for the pathetic little attention seeker that you are gelico
That is what I do
I see through people that bullshit
Guest- Guest
Re: Judge acquits man of controlling behaviour because his partner was too strong and capable to be affected.
Raggamuffin wrote:gelico wrote:
if that's the best didge's imagination can come up with then i'm sorely disappointed, that's what
I haven't worn plimsolls for years, and certainly not in the presence of Tommy Robinson.
you've ruined my orgasm now, you happy?
oh go on raggs, put the plimsolls on for me, now work them honey, own them, show them who's boss. now you and tommy put one on each, that's right now hop, hop i say
omg that's it, i'm done
Guest- Guest
Re: Judge acquits man of controlling behaviour because his partner was too strong and capable to be affected.
Thor wrote:Raggamuffin wrote:
I haven't worn plimsolls for years, and certainly not in the presence of Tommy Robinson.
Show me once where Gelico condemned the warped views of Rags?
Never happened
Are you talking to me or about me?
Raggamuffin- Forum Detective ????♀️
- Posts : 33746
Join date : 2014-02-10
Re: Judge acquits man of controlling behaviour because his partner was too strong and capable to be affected.
gelico wrote:Raggamuffin wrote:
I haven't worn plimsolls for years, and certainly not in the presence of Tommy Robinson.
you've ruined my orgasm now, you happy?
oh go on raggs, put the plimsolls on for me, now work them honey, own them, show them who's boss. now you and tommy put one on each, that's right now hop, hop i say
omg that's it, i'm done
Oh come on girls, you can only keep up this bullshit for so long before I will expose you as full of bullshit
Guest- Guest
Re: Judge acquits man of controlling behaviour because his partner was too strong and capable to be affected.
gelico wrote:Raggamuffin wrote:
I haven't worn plimsolls for years, and certainly not in the presence of Tommy Robinson.
you've ruined my orgasm now, you happy?
oh go on raggs, put the plimsolls on for me, now work them honey, own them, show them who's boss. now you and tommy put one on each, that's right now hop, hop i say
omg that's it, i'm done
Raggamuffin- Forum Detective ????♀️
- Posts : 33746
Join date : 2014-02-10
Re: Judge acquits man of controlling behaviour because his partner was too strong and capable to be affected.
Raggamuffin wrote:Thor wrote:
Show me once where Gelico condemned the warped views of Rags?
Never happened
Are you talking to me or about me?
Absolutely
Show me where Gelico took yoo to task?
Guest- Guest
Re: Judge acquits man of controlling behaviour because his partner was too strong and capable to be affected.
Thor wrote:gelico wrote:
you've ruined my orgasm now, you happy?
oh go on raggs, put the plimsolls on for me, now work them honey, own them, show them who's boss. now you and tommy put one on each, that's right now hop, hop i say
omg that's it, i'm done
Oh come on girls, you can only keep up this bullshit for so long before I will expose you as full of bullshit
You're the one who came out with some bullshit about plimsolls and Tommy Robinson.
Raggamuffin- Forum Detective ????♀️
- Posts : 33746
Join date : 2014-02-10
Re: Judge acquits man of controlling behaviour because his partner was too strong and capable to be affected.
Thor wrote:Raggamuffin wrote:
Are you talking to me or about me?
Absolutely
Show me where Gelico took yoo to task?
Why?
Raggamuffin- Forum Detective ????♀️
- Posts : 33746
Join date : 2014-02-10
Re: Judge acquits man of controlling behaviour because his partner was too strong and capable to be affected.
gelico wrote:Raggamuffin wrote:
I haven't worn plimsolls for years, and certainly not in the presence of Tommy Robinson.
you've ruined my orgasm now, you happy?
oh go on raggs, put the plimsolls on for me, now work them honey, own them, show them who's boss. now you and tommy put one on each, that's right now hop, hop i say
omg that's it, i'm done
I am sure you have not had one for many years
But will I really mock you as you are trying to do to me?
No
That is the difference between me and you
You are a coward and unable to stand up to the women here and I will always stand uo to others insulting you
Guest- Guest
Re: Judge acquits man of controlling behaviour because his partner was too strong and capable to be affected.
Raggamuffin wrote:Thor wrote:
Oh come on girls, you can only keep up this bullshit for so long before I will expose you as full of bullshit
You're the one who came out with some bullshit about plimsolls and Tommy Robinson.
Gelico loves him
Guest- Guest
Re: Judge acquits man of controlling behaviour because his partner was too strong and capable to be affected.
Raggamuffin wrote:Thor wrote:
Absolutely
Show me where Gelico took yoo to task?
Why?
It proves she is full of shit
Guest- Guest
Re: Judge acquits man of controlling behaviour because his partner was too strong and capable to be affected.
the thin blue line.... i remember that episode.....
Victorismyhero- INTERNAL SECURITY DIRECTOR
- Posts : 11441
Join date : 2015-11-06
Re: Judge acquits man of controlling behaviour because his partner was too strong and capable to be affected.
Thor wrote:Raggamuffin wrote:
Why?
It proves she is full of shit
Why does it?
Raggamuffin- Forum Detective ????♀️
- Posts : 33746
Join date : 2014-02-10
Re: Judge acquits man of controlling behaviour because his partner was too strong and capable to be affected.
Raggamuffin wrote:Thor wrote:
It proves she is full of shit
Why does it?
She hides behind humour and is not honest
She can prove me wrong of course
Guest- Guest
Re: Judge acquits man of controlling behaviour because his partner was too strong and capable to be affected.
Lord Foul wrote:the thin blue line.... i remember that episode.....
Guest- Guest
Re: Judge acquits man of controlling behaviour because his partner was too strong and capable to be affected.
Lord Foul wrote:the thin blue line.... i remember that episode.....
It was a great episode!
Raggamuffin- Forum Detective ????♀️
- Posts : 33746
Join date : 2014-02-10
Re: Judge acquits man of controlling behaviour because his partner was too strong and capable to be affected.
Raggamuffin wrote:Lord Foul wrote:Raggamuffin wrote:
Nah, I'm not buying it. I simply don't believe that Foul believed that getting the man sacked would make a difference - he did it out of revenge. I also don't really believe that Foul has so much power - he must surely run out of companies where they do the funny handshake.
you have no idea of how the world of business runs do you....I dont NEED to know EVERYONE........just a few, in the right places......
you think what I did was dirty...god if you only knew.......
All I can say is that I like to play by the rules.
why? nobody else does.....
Victorismyhero- INTERNAL SECURITY DIRECTOR
- Posts : 11441
Join date : 2015-11-06
Re: Judge acquits man of controlling behaviour because his partner was too strong and capable to be affected.
Thor wrote:Raggamuffin wrote:
Why does it?
She hides behind humour and is not honest
She can prove me wrong of course
She might not think my views are warped though.
Raggamuffin- Forum Detective ????♀️
- Posts : 33746
Join date : 2014-02-10
Re: Judge acquits man of controlling behaviour because his partner was too strong and capable to be affected.
Lord Foul wrote:Raggamuffin wrote:
All I can say is that I like to play by the rules.
why? nobody else does.....
I like to be different.
Raggamuffin- Forum Detective ????♀️
- Posts : 33746
Join date : 2014-02-10
Re: Judge acquits man of controlling behaviour because his partner was too strong and capable to be affected.
Thor wrote:gelico wrote:
you've ruined my orgasm now, you happy?
oh go on raggs, put the plimsolls on for me, now work them honey, own them, show them who's boss. now you and tommy put one on each, that's right now hop, hop i say
omg that's it, i'm done
I am sure you have not had one for many years
i have a great imagination, didge, don't underestimate me
But will I really mock you as you are trying to do to me?
i dont know
No
ok, your choice
That is the difference between me and you
oh, didge, there are so so so so so many differences between me and you
You are a coward and unable to stand up to the women here and I will always stand uo to others insulting you
who am i unable to stand up to pray tell?
like i need you to stand up for me
oh, please didge, wind it in
Guest- Guest
Re: Judge acquits man of controlling behaviour because his partner was too strong and capable to be affected.
Raggamuffin wrote:Lord Foul wrote:the thin blue line.... i remember that episode.....
It was a great episode!
to be fair, it was probably one of the best....
Victorismyhero- INTERNAL SECURITY DIRECTOR
- Posts : 11441
Join date : 2015-11-06
Re: Judge acquits man of controlling behaviour because his partner was too strong and capable to be affected.
Raggamuffin wrote:Thor wrote:
She hides behind humour and is not honest
She can prove me wrong of course
She might not think my views are warped though.
Well she must be at warp factor 8 herself
Guest- Guest
Re: Judge acquits man of controlling behaviour because his partner was too strong and capable to be affected.
Thor wrote:Raggamuffin wrote:
I haven't worn plimsolls for years, and certainly not in the presence of Tommy Robinson.
Show me once where Gelico condemned the warped views of Rags?
Never happened
no, it didn't
that would be because, if you paid attention at the beginning, i said ''I agree with what you say''
I do not consider her views to be warped
you clearly do, and that's fine
you have a right to your opinion
Guest- Guest
Re: Judge acquits man of controlling behaviour because his partner was too strong and capable to be affected.
Lord Foul wrote:Raggamuffin wrote:
It was a great episode!
to be fair, it was probably one of the best....
I loved all of the thin blue line episodes
and all of the characters
my favourite has to be grim though,
Guest- Guest
Re: Judge acquits man of controlling behaviour because his partner was too strong and capable to be affected.
gelico wrote:Thor wrote:
I am sure you have not had one for many years
i have a great imagination, didge, don't underestimate me
But will I really mock you as you are trying to do to me?
i dont know
No
ok, your choice
That is the difference between me and you
oh, didge, there are so so so so so many differences between me and you
You are a coward and unable to stand up to the women here and I will always stand uo to others insulting you
who am i unable to stand up to pray tell?
like i need you to stand up for me
oh, please didge, wind it in
Its like talking to a brick wall
I dont care about you at all Gelico, as you often tell me to pathetically try to get at me
Look there is many differences, I do not sell myself out to be liked
You never challenge women on views
That was evident tonight and pathetic and you did get destroyed by Lord Foul
I guess you thoughtt you were amasing
So do not tell me to wind it
Its boring when you claim youre4 intelligent
You are not
Your son is and you are living off this
So stop[ trying to insult me and I wont insult you
As it willbother you than it will me
Guest- Guest
Re: Judge acquits man of controlling behaviour because his partner was too strong and capable to be affected.
gelico wrote:Thor wrote:
Show me once where Gelico condemned the warped views of Rags?
Never happened
no, it didn't
that would be because, if you paid attention at the beginning, i said ''I agree with what you say''
I do not consider her views to be warped
you clearly do, and that's fine
you have a right to your opinion
So you think based on her views people are to blame when controlled
Can I have a yes or no on this?
Including grooming victims?
Guest- Guest
Re: Judge acquits man of controlling behaviour because his partner was too strong and capable to be affected.
anyway ladies and gentlemen...its time i got some much needed beauty sleep (god do I need it)
so I'll see you tomorrow...
so I'll see you tomorrow...
Victorismyhero- INTERNAL SECURITY DIRECTOR
- Posts : 11441
Join date : 2015-11-06
Re: Judge acquits man of controlling behaviour because his partner was too strong and capable to be affected.
Thor wrote:gelico wrote:
who am i unable to stand up to pray tell?
like i need you to stand up for me
oh, please didge, wind it in
Its like talking to a brick wall
I dont care about you at all Gelico, as you often tell me to pathetically try to get at me
Look there is many differences, I do not sell myself out to be liked
You never challenge women on views
That was evident tonight and pathetic and you did get destroyed by Lord Foul
I guess you thoughtt you were amasing
So do not tell me to wind it
Its boring when you claim youre4 intelligent
You are not
Your son is and you are living off this
So stop[ trying to insult me and I wont insult you
As it willbother you than it will me
Nobody got destroyed by Foul. It's a discussion where there are differences of opinion.
That was a mean post by the way.
Raggamuffin- Forum Detective ????♀️
- Posts : 33746
Join date : 2014-02-10
Re: Judge acquits man of controlling behaviour because his partner was too strong and capable to be affected.
Lord Foul wrote:anyway ladies and gentlemen...its time i got some much needed beauty sleep (god do I need it)
so I'll see you tomorrow...
Goodnight. Enjoy your dreams about kissing a turkey's bottom.
Raggamuffin- Forum Detective ????♀️
- Posts : 33746
Join date : 2014-02-10
Re: Judge acquits man of controlling behaviour because his partner was too strong and capable to be affected.
Raggamuffin wrote:Thor wrote:
Its like talking to a brick wall
I dont care about you at all Gelico, as you often tell me to pathetically try to get at me
Look there is many differences, I do not sell myself out to be liked
You never challenge women on views
That was evident tonight and pathetic and you did get destroyed by Lord Foul
I guess you thoughtt you were amasing
So do not tell me to wind it
Its boring when you claim youre4 intelligent
You are not
Your son is and you are living off this
So stop[ trying to insult me and I wont insult you
As it willbother you than it will me
Nobody got destroyed by Foul. It's a discussion where there are differences of opinion.
That was a mean post by the way.
Oh no? Ae you going to report me to the mean brigade?
Get a grip you snowlfake, as i seriously dont give a fuck if you are bothered
Its not actually me annoying you
Its you being a fuckwit
Guest- Guest
Re: Judge acquits man of controlling behaviour because his partner was too strong and capable to be affected.
Raggamuffin wrote:Lord Foul wrote:anyway ladies and gentlemen...its time i got some much needed beauty sleep (god do I need it)
so I'll see you tomorrow...
Goodnight. Enjoy your dreams about kissing a turkey's bottom.
he he....
Victorismyhero- INTERNAL SECURITY DIRECTOR
- Posts : 11441
Join date : 2015-11-06
Re: Judge acquits man of controlling behaviour because his partner was too strong and capable to be affected.
Thor wrote:Raggamuffin wrote:
Nobody got destroyed by Foul. It's a discussion where there are differences of opinion.
That was a mean post by the way.
Oh no? Ae you going to report me to the mean brigade?
Get a grip you snowlfake, as i seriously dont give a fuck if you are bothered
Its not actually me annoying you
Its you being a fuckwit
You're the one who thinks that being mean warrants a whole court case and a conviction.
Raggamuffin- Forum Detective ????♀️
- Posts : 33746
Join date : 2014-02-10
Re: Judge acquits man of controlling behaviour because his partner was too strong and capable to be affected.
Raggamuffin wrote:Lord Foul wrote:anyway ladies and gentlemen...its time i got some much needed beauty sleep (god do I need it)
so I'll see you tomorrow...
Goodnight. Enjoy your dreams about kissing a turkey's bottom.
With a shotgun
Guest- Guest
Re: Judge acquits man of controlling behaviour because his partner was too strong and capable to be affected.
you think?Thor wrote:gelico wrote:
who am i unable to stand up to pray tell?
like i need you to stand up for me
oh, please didge, wind it in
Its like talking to a brick wall
I wouldn't know, I don't converse with brick walls
I dont care about you at all Gelico, as you often tell me to pathetically try to get at me
ok
Look there is many differences, I do not sell myself out to be liked
good for you, nor should you
You never challenge women on views
i merely give my own opinions on whatever the OP is. No one has to agree with me
That was evident tonight and pathetic and you did get destroyed by Lord Foul
destroyed? LF explained in more detail what his situation was and I said I understood his actions, destroyed how exactly?
I guess you thoughtt you were amasing
I do think I'm amazing but I don't see how that's really relevant tbh
So do not tell me to wind it
wind it in
Its boring when you claim youre4 intelligent
I am but can you show me where I made that claim
You are not
your opinion
Your son is and you are living off this
you wanna explain that one? and which son are you talking about?
So stop insult me and I wont insult you
I haven't insulted you and you can insult me if that's what you want to do, It's a free world
As it willbother you than it will me
Last edited by gelico on Sat Nov 24, 2018 12:50 am; edited 1 time in total
Guest- Guest
Re: Judge acquits man of controlling behaviour because his partner was too strong and capable to be affected.
Raggamuffin wrote:Thor wrote:
Oh no? Ae you going to report me to the mean brigade?
Get a grip you snowlfake, as i seriously dont give a fuck if you are bothered
Its not actually me annoying you
Its you being a fuckwit
You're the one who thinks that being mean warrants a whole court case and a conviction.
Never claimed that, but it has actually happeneed
I suggest you bow down before I embarress you again Rags
Guest- Guest
Re: Judge acquits man of controlling behaviour because his partner was too strong and capable to be affected.
Thor wrote:Raggamuffin wrote:
You're the one who thinks that being mean warrants a whole court case and a conviction.
Never claimed that, but it has actually happeneed
I suggest you bow down before I embarress you again Rags
What's happened?
You're actually embarrassing yourself. Firstly, you got two situations mixed up, and then you started blathering on about plimsolls. Maybe you should just get some rest.
Raggamuffin- Forum Detective ????♀️
- Posts : 33746
Join date : 2014-02-10
Re: Judge acquits man of controlling behaviour because his partner was too strong and capable to be affected.
gelico wrote:Thor wrote:
Its like talking to a brick wall
I wouldn't know, I don't converse with brick walls
I dont care about you at all Gelico, as you often tell me to pathetically try to get at me
ok
Look there is many differences, I do not sell myself out to be liked
good for you, nor should you
You never challenge women on views
i merely give my own opinions on whatever the OP is. No one has to agree with me
That was evident tonight and pathetic and you did get destroyed by Lord Foul
destroyed? LF explained in more detail what his situation was and I said I understood his actions, destroyed how exactly?
I guess you thoughtt you were amasing
I do think I'm amazing but I don't see how that's really relevant tbh
So do not tell me to wind it
wind it in
Its boring when you claim youre4 intelligent
I am but can you show me where I made that claim
You are not
your opinion
Your son is and you are living off this
you wanna explain that one? and which son are you talking about?
So stopult me and I wont insult you
I haven't insulted you and you can insult me if that's what you want to do, It's a free world
As it willbother you than it will me
you think?
So after all that drivel, can you show me any point where you disagreed with Rags and debated her on this
It wont bother me Gelico
It will bother you more than me
Guest- Guest
Re: Judge acquits man of controlling behaviour because his partner was too strong and capable to be affected.
Raggamuffin wrote:Thor wrote:
Never claimed that, but it has actually happeneed
I suggest you bow down before I embarress you again Rags
What's happened?
You're actually embarrassing yourself. Firstly, you got two situations mixed up, and then you started blathering on about plimsolls. Maybe you should just get some rest.
I never had anything mixed up
Gelico is a sheep
Baaaa
Guest- Guest
Re: Judge acquits man of controlling behaviour because his partner was too strong and capable to be affected.
gelico wrote:you think?Thor wrote:
Its like talking to a brick wall
I wouldn't know, I don't converse with brick walls
I dont care about you at all Gelico, as you often tell me to pathetically try to get at me
ok
Look there is many differences, I do not sell myself out to be liked
good for you, nor should you
You never challenge women on views
i merely give my own opinions on whatever the OP is. No one has to agree with me
That was evident tonight and pathetic and you did get destroyed by Lord Foul
destroyed? LF explained in more detail what his situation was and I said I understood his actions, destroyed how exactly?
I guess you thoughtt you were amasing
I do think I'm amazing but I don't see how that's really relevant tbh
So do not tell me to wind it
wind it in
Its boring when you claim youre4 intelligent
I am but can you show me where I made that claim
You are not
your opinion
Your son is and you are living off this
you wanna explain that one? and which son are you talking about?
So stop insult me and I wont insult you
I haven't insulted you and you can insult me if that's what you want to do, It's a free world
As it willbother you than it will me
didge, please can you explain what you meant about my son?
Guest- Guest
Re: Judge acquits man of controlling behaviour because his partner was too strong and capable to be affected.
Thor wrote:gelico wrote:
you think?
So after all that drivel, can you show me any point where you disagreed with Rags and debated her on this
It wont bother me Gelico
It will bother you more than me
i just told you I agreed with her points. Why don't you pay attention.
What wont bother you?
what will bother me?
Guest- Guest
Re: Judge acquits man of controlling behaviour because his partner was too strong and capable to be affected.
and didge...cool it man, its only a discussion forum.....(argument forum???)
ragga thinks I'm morally dubious...I can live with that
I get results, even if that occasionally means slithering around in some dark and noisome places, but you cant fight a pig without rolling in the mud.....and I'd be dishonest to deny I can get as low as a snakes belly if its called for...like I said I dont do "better than" I am at least as bad, if not worse than my opponent...thats how you win....
winning the moral high ground isnt winning the war......
and geli at least sees where i'm coming from (scuse me????????????)
as to what I think...
water off a ducks back....me I'm pure teflon, I still have my halo, even if I'm standing on it ....
sleep well matey
ragga thinks I'm morally dubious...I can live with that
I get results, even if that occasionally means slithering around in some dark and noisome places, but you cant fight a pig without rolling in the mud.....and I'd be dishonest to deny I can get as low as a snakes belly if its called for...like I said I dont do "better than" I am at least as bad, if not worse than my opponent...thats how you win....
winning the moral high ground isnt winning the war......
and geli at least sees where i'm coming from (scuse me????????????)
as to what I think...
water off a ducks back....me I'm pure teflon, I still have my halo, even if I'm standing on it ....
sleep well matey
Victorismyhero- INTERNAL SECURITY DIRECTOR
- Posts : 11441
Join date : 2015-11-06
Re: Judge acquits man of controlling behaviour because his partner was too strong and capable to be affected.
gelico wrote:gelico wrote:
you think?
didge, please can you explain what you meant about my son?
No problem
He is honest you are not
Hence the point ytou took me and Lord foul to task to night and not many views Rags made
You never questioned her once
Why?
Befor you ask, you have told me about him, am I wrong?
Guest- Guest
Re: Judge acquits man of controlling behaviour because his partner was too strong and capable to be affected.
Lord Foul wrote:and didge...cool it man, its only a discussion forum.....(argument forum???)
I get results, even if that occasionally means slithering around in some dark and noisome places, but you cant fight a pig without rolling in the mud.....and I'd be dishonest to deny I can get as low as a snakes belly if its called for...like I said I dont do "better than" I am at least as bad, if not worse than my opponent...thats how you win....
we all have a very dark side and are probably all capable of doing the most hideous things when our loved ones are involved. I think merely handing over some info was quite restrained if i'm honest
and if defeating your opponent means being even more devious or being prepared to go that one step further then so be it
i'm on board and as stated, solved the problem so
Guest- Guest
Re: Judge acquits man of controlling behaviour because his partner was too strong and capable to be affected.
Lord Foul wrote:and didge...cool it man, its only a discussion forum.....(argument forum???)
ragga thinks I'm morally dubious...I can live with that
I get results, even if that occasionally means slithering around in some dark and noisome places, but you cant fight a pig without rolling in the mud.....and I'd be dishonest to deny I can get as low as a snakes belly if its called for...like I said I dont do "better than" I am at least as bad, if not worse than my opponent...thats how you win....
winning the moral high ground isnt winning the war......
and geli at least sees where i'm coming from (scuse me????????????)
as to what I think...
water off a ducks back....me I'm pure teflon, I still have my halo, even if I'm standing on it ....
sleep well matey
Hang on mate they are quote happy to mock me
That is cool
I am not knocking gelico's boy
I am calling into questions gelicos honesty here
They are happy to mock
I never mocked her boy and never would
Guest- Guest
Re: Judge acquits man of controlling behaviour because his partner was too strong and capable to be affected.
Thor wrote:Jules wrote:It's not always easy and straightforward to just pack your bags and leave an abusive partner. There can be many obstacles especially when children are involved.
As regards having children with a cruel partner, there is no excuse. Having control of your fertility is crucial and one of the very basic skills every woman should have, and be taught at school.
A sensible answer, but sadly, some here need to blame others
With Gelico, she needs to get an orgaism over seeing Tommy Robinson and Rags, over a pair of plimsolls.
Some people have needs. sadly so, and are followers
They are led by negativity
As its easier to blame others
Not had time to read any other posts in this thread, just going off the OP.
I'll swing by tomorrow & read the whole thread.
Domestic abuse in all its forms is widely interesting, we had to take regular awareness courses on it.[Paid for by our employers - cost us nowt.]
Night!
JulesV- Forum Detective ????♀️
- Posts : 4275
Join date : 2016-07-30
Location : Vantage Point
Re: Judge acquits man of controlling behaviour because his partner was too strong and capable to be affected.
gelico wrote:Thor wrote:
So after all that drivel, can you show me any point where you disagreed with Rags and debated her on this
It wont bother me Gelico
It will bother you more than me
i just told you I agreed with her points. Why don't you pay attention.
What wont bother you?
what will bother me?
Absolutely nothing Gelico
I simple think you are unconciously a feminist
You are always side with women
Not bothered if I am wrong on this, but I think I am, right
Guest- Guest
Re: Judge acquits man of controlling behaviour because his partner was too strong and capable to be affected.
Thor wrote:gelico wrote:
didge, please can you explain what you meant about my son?
No problem
He is honest you are not
Hence the point ytou took me and Lord foul to task to night and not many views Rags made
You never questioned her once
Why?
Befor you ask, you have told me about him, am I wrong?
firstly, i did not take LF to task over anything
secondly, i often mention my family members, but if you want to sink that low that you use them to try and score points over me than i can only feel sorry for you
how utterly low and pathetic that was
and how sad
Guest- Guest
Page 5 of 9 • 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
Similar topics
» Controlling girlfriend, 22, who starved and stabbed her partner, banned him from her bed and took over his Facebook account is jailed for more than seven years
» Nagging wife who told her bodybuilder husband to tidy the house more and go to the gym less is ARRESTED and locked in cells for 17 hours and charged with 'controlling behaviour'
» Fury as High Court judge says it's a 'fundamental human right' for a man to have sex with his wife as he hears case of whether woman with learning difficulties is capable of giving consent
» What does Russia want controlling Trump?
» Dogs really are capable of loving their owners, research suggests
» Nagging wife who told her bodybuilder husband to tidy the house more and go to the gym less is ARRESTED and locked in cells for 17 hours and charged with 'controlling behaviour'
» Fury as High Court judge says it's a 'fundamental human right' for a man to have sex with his wife as he hears case of whether woman with learning difficulties is capable of giving consent
» What does Russia want controlling Trump?
» Dogs really are capable of loving their owners, research suggests
Page 5 of 9
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Sat Mar 18, 2023 12:28 pm by Ben Reilly
» TOTAL MADNESS Great British Railway Journeys among shows flagged by counter terror scheme ‘for encouraging far-right sympathies
Wed Feb 22, 2023 5:14 pm by Tommy Monk
» Interesting COVID figures
Tue Feb 21, 2023 5:00 am by Tommy Monk
» HAPPY CHRISTMAS.
Sun Jan 01, 2023 7:33 pm by Tommy Monk
» The Fight Over Climate Change is Over (The Greenies Won!)
Thu Dec 15, 2022 3:59 pm by Tommy Monk
» Trump supporter murders wife, kills family dog, shoots daughter
Mon Dec 12, 2022 1:21 am by 'Wolfie
» Quill
Thu Oct 20, 2022 10:28 pm by Tommy Monk
» Algerian Woman under investigation for torture and murder of French girl, 12, whose body was found in plastic case in Paris
Thu Oct 20, 2022 10:04 pm by Tommy Monk
» Wind turbines cool down the Earth (edited with better video link)
Sun Oct 16, 2022 9:19 am by Ben Reilly
» Saying goodbye to our Queen.
Sun Sep 25, 2022 9:02 pm by Maddog
» PHEW.
Sat Sep 17, 2022 6:33 pm by Syl
» And here's some more enrichment...
Thu Sep 15, 2022 3:46 pm by Ben Reilly
» John F Kennedy Assassination
Thu Sep 15, 2022 3:40 pm by Ben Reilly
» Where is everyone lately...?
Thu Sep 15, 2022 3:33 pm by Ben Reilly
» London violence over the weekend...
Mon Sep 05, 2022 2:19 pm by Tommy Monk
» Why should anyone believe anything that Mo Farah says...!?
Wed Jul 13, 2022 1:44 am by Tommy Monk
» Liverpool Labour defends mayor role poll after turnout was only 3% and they say they will push ahead with the option that was least preferred!!!
Mon Jul 11, 2022 1:11 pm by Tommy Monk
» Labour leader Keir Stammer can't answer the simple question of whether a woman has a penis or not...
Mon Jul 11, 2022 3:58 am by Tommy Monk
» More evidence of remoaners still trying to overturn Brexit... and this is a conservative MP who should be drummed out of the party and out of parliament!
Sun Jul 10, 2022 10:50 pm by Tommy Monk
» R Kelly 30 years, Ghislaine Maxwell 20 years... but here in UK...
Fri Jul 08, 2022 5:31 pm by Original Quill