School staff inadvertently record foul-mouthed chat about autistic pupil on his mother's VOICEMAIL... after believing they had hung up

Tommy Monk wrote:

Lord Foul wrote:
Firstly that comment wasnt a "joke" .  It was just nasty.
Second too many various examples of nasty and unpleasant people hide behind That Excuse of "Im only jokeing" 
Thirdly it IS unprofessional
Fourthly they are clearly too stupid to teach, I mean, how hard is it toa ensure you have actually terminated a call ffs
Finally, if these teachers,whom you thinkare are so put upon were any  good they would be working in industry where money is better one presumes.

Evening LF...


Didge posted that he wanted to shoot/kill and behead me, the other day... and then he tried the excuse of 'only joking'...!


What do you think about that...?

Vintage wrote:Yes, you do and always have, I did say you used to have good discussions although you must spend an inordinate amount of time trawling for subjects, anyway that's your business. The problem is you loose control if anyone dares to disagree with you, you even turn a light hearted thread into a s**t fest of serious self indulgent rancour. The only one with present and dangerous hatred in their soul is you. Goodnight.

Sorry for that to the rest of you, had to get that off my chest.

Agree with what Gelico said.

Didge wrote:

Vintage wrote:

- No that's quite right - but its not for you to hound and harrass them for proof or valid points, they have an opinion, you think its wrong, you are entitled to say so and leave it there, accept their opinion is not agreeing with yours and let it go. You harrass and harry people who don't agree with you and who exactly says you are always right.  
You have to understand people don't all come here for a heated debate, making points and parrying others like some verbal fencing match, many just want to chat and air their views and the dictatorial comebacks are very off putting, I was considering whether to not bother anymore because of that and the fact that you ripped into me on at least three occassions lately which were totally uncalled for and a few others have been targetted as well but I didn't see why I should be chased away, even though I'm not a great contributor, its not the Oxford debating society everyone's entitled to their opinion, if you want heated 'debate' do so with others that are up for it. Try not to be so rude and contemptuous all the time, you may be passionate in your beliefs but cool down a bit.

I can do as i please, if people do not offer up evidence for their claims.

Its not a case of whether I am right or wrong, but for people to back up their assumptions. To claim I think I am always right, is a lie, when more than anyone else I have admitted to being wrong. Even more I have changed views, based on listening to others from here. So again that is a poor asumption from you

Going off peoples looks, is not evidence, its a poor perceived view.

For example the mother could be many things but is being judge on her looks alone. The views where people disagree on whether its right or wrong to go to the public are valid. The moment someone here got personal about her on her looks. It ceases to be a valid point and is quite vindictive. Claims on attention also have no evidnece. They are based again on a view held that people going to the press are attention seekers.

It seems those thinking this clearly have no clue on history, because throughout history. People have gone public with percieved or real problems. How on earth do you think women ended up getting the vote? Through gaining attention to the problem. It was not about personal attention for them, but women's rights

I mean the funniest thing about your reply is you claiming to say I tell and harras people what to do and in the same breath you are trying to tell me what to do.

Hypocrisy much?

So you think debates should be a certain way. I think we are all grown up and can take heated debates. If people cannot, then they should question why they are here. We are going to disagree on that, but again, you are trying to tell me what you think debates should be here, just as I have done

The point is, not all opinions are valid

Take when people have been basemented, like with the recent slurs to Syl, Horatio and magic by Wolf.

Are you going to tell me his views were valid in regards to them?

I dont think so

Look if people want to be snowflakes, then the forum is not for them and I am not going to stop ripping into people. Where again i did here with syl, when I was not even abusive. I simple took her to task for what I saw, was her being very hateful. She judged this person and made poor accusations. Not based on any facts, but on appearance. We would never stand for that, if the other person was Black, Asian etc and they were judged on the colour of their skin. So why should someone or anyone stand for such hate expressed towards another person. This being a Mother of an autistic child for her apperance?

If people want to jump into the frying pan with such views, then dont expect they wont get burnt

Raggamuffin wrote:

Didge wrote:

I can do as i please, if people do not offer up evidence for their claims.

Its not a case of whether I am right or wrong, but for people to back up their assumptions. To claim I think I am always right, is a lie, when more than anyone else I have admitted to being wrong. Even more I have changed views, based on listening to others from here. So again that is a poor asumption from you

Going off peoples looks, is not evidence, its a poor perceived view.

For example the mother could be many things but is being judge on her looks alone. The views where people disagree on whether its right or wrong to go to the public are valid. The moment someone here got personal about her on her looks. It ceases to be a valid point and is quite vindictive. Claims on attention also have no evidnece. They are based again on a view held that people going to the press are attention seekers.

It seems those thinking this clearly have no clue on history, because throughout history. People have gone public with percieved or real problems. How on earth do you think women ended up getting the vote? Through gaining attention to the problem. It was not about personal attention for them, but women's rights

I mean the funniest thing about your reply is you claiming to say I tell and harras people what to do and in the same breath you are trying to tell me what to do.

Hypocrisy much?

So you think debates should be a certain way. I think we are all grown up and can take heated debates. If people cannot, then they should question why they are here. We are going to disagree on that, but again, you are trying to tell me what you think debates should be here, just as I have done

The point is, not all opinions are valid

Take when people have been basemented, like with the recent slurs to Syl, Horatio and magic by Wolf.

Are you going to tell me his views were valid in regards to them?

I dont think so

Look if people want to be snowflakes, then the forum is not for them and I am not going to stop ripping into people. Where again i did here with syl, when I was not even abusive. I simple took her to task for what I saw, was her being very hateful. She judged this person and made poor accusations. Not based on any facts, but on appearance. We would never stand for that, if the other person was Black, Asian etc and they were judged on the colour of their skin. So why should someone or anyone stand for such hate expressed towards another person. This being a Mother of an autistic child for her apperance?

If people want to jump into the frying pan with such views, then dont expect they wont get burnt

It's not for you to say that this forum is not for people who don't want to be abused by you. It's for anyone - you don't get to say who should be here.

Didge wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

It's not for you to say that this forum is not for people who don't want to be abused by you. It's for anyone - you don't get to say who should be here.

Like I say, dont jump in the frying pan and not expect to get burnt

I never said who should be here and welcome anyone

So again you are misleading people over me saying that if people cannot take things, then they should not be here, if they cannot handle this. That is simple advice, as you are trying to do with me

So I can say as I please

You dont like that, then that is your tough luck

Raggamuffin wrote:

Didge wrote:


Like I say, dont jump in the frying pan and not expect to get burnt

I never said who should be here and welcome anyone

So again you are misleading people over me saying that if people cannot take things, then they should not be here, if they cannot handle this. That is simple advice, as you are trying to do with me

So I can say as I please

You dont like that, then that is your tough luck

That is pretty much what you said. You are not entitled to say how people should debate, and you have no justification for being rude to them if they disagree with you. It just makes you look bossy, opinionated, and intolerant. That puts you in the wrong, not them.

Didge wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

That is pretty much what you said. You are not entitled to say how people should debate, and you have no justification for being rude to them if they disagree with you. It just makes you look bossy, opinionated, and intolerant. That puts you in the wrong, not them.

No its not, no matter how badly you try to claim and I just showed you were wrong.

lol, so Vintage was not entittled to tell me how to debate, as she did earlier then?

I was not rude to anyone on this thread, they were to me if you look back

Show me where I was?

I castigated Syl for poorly accusing the mother, as basically a prostitute on her looks. Her looks had zero to do with anything here. It was people looking negativelly at her based on her looks, to then be vindictive to her

I am not going to stand for that, when they are superficially judging her

So was Syl in the right for her superficial views of the mother?

Yes or no?

Raggamuffin wrote:

Didge wrote:

No its not, no matter how badly you try to claim and I just showed you were wrong.

lol, so Vintage was not entittled to tell me how to debate, as she did earlier then?

I was not rude to anyone on this thread, they were to me if you look back

Show me where I was?

I castigated Syl for poorly accusing the mother, as basically a prostitute on her looks. Her looks had zero to do with anything here. It was people looking negativelly at her based on her looks, to then be vindictive to her

I am not going to stand for that, when they are superficially judging her

So was Syl in the right for her superficial views of the mother?

Yes or no?

You're rude to people in every thread. However, if you want to look like a bossy, opinionated, intolerant fool, that's entirely up to you.

HoratioTarr wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

HoratioTarr wrote:

I've always loved that.