DON'T USE Words Containing "Man"??

Original Quill wrote:Interesting how invested in misogyny conservatism has become.  

Oh, and um...Purdue University speaks for America on the issue of manhood??  Fook...we kick the shit outta Purdue every year in football.  

Didge wrote:

Original Quill wrote:Interesting how invested in misogyny conservatism has become.  

Oh, and um...Purdue University speaks for America on the issue of manhood??  Fook...we kick the shit outta Purdue every year in football.  

How is saying Human, Female, Woman, misogony?

So if a woman says she is female and a woman, she is to you hateful to herself according to you??

Original Quill wrote:

Didge wrote:


How is saying Human, Female, Woman, misogony?

So if a woman says she is female and a woman, she is to you hateful to herself according to you??

It's not the examples, it's the general preoccupation.  The whole aura of conservatism is filled with misogyny these days.  Look at pussy-grabber.  How many woman has he raped?  17 - 18??  Yet conservatives cheer him even more.

Original Quill wrote:Seems to me the whole conservative movement has turned against women.  Pussy-grabber is only one example.  There are many, many more examples.

Tommy Monk wrote:Men are men, and are happy to be defined as men...


Women are women, and are happy to be defined as women...


Leftys are happy to define each as men/women when they are banging on about 'equality targets' etc...


So who is this nonsense really for...?


Cos as far as I can see... nobody wants this idiotic PC bullshit...!!!


So, who are these idiots who are making all this shit up...???


And why are their stupid pea brained ideas getting such recognition/respect/attention from anybody... and why are these idiotic ideas getting adopted as policy by any organisations...?

Tommy Monk wrote:

Already happened with plenty of other well known words/phrases...

eg... 'blackboard'... 'chairman'...

Didge wrote:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FRI9uynD2EE

I posted this in recreation, as its very funny

Tommy Monk wrote:Men are men, and are happy to be defined as men...


Women are women, and are happy to be defined as women...


Leftys are happy to define each as men/women when they are banging on about 'equality targets' etc...


So who is this nonsense really for...?


Cos as far as I can see... nobody wants this idiotic PC bullshit...!!!


So, who are these idiots who are making all this shit up...???


And why are their stupid pea brained ideas getting such recognition/respect/attention from anybody... and why are these idiotic ideas getting adopted as policy by any organisations...?

eddie wrote:Actually, that video seems like a wind-up.

eddie wrote:Actually, that video seems like a wind-up.

gelico wrote:

Didge wrote:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FRI9uynD2EE

I posted this in recreation, as its very funny

hahaha i saw this the other night didge

the woman is a nutjob

hollywood just got real

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nJ0lfzHKqV0

Didge wrote:

gelico wrote:


hahaha i saw this the other night didge

the woman is a nutjob

hollywood just got real

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nJ0lfzHKqV0

She is off the charts whackadoodle

WhoseYourWolfie wrote:

Didge wrote:




She is off the charts whackadoodle

While I was watching that, I started to wonder, though :

Is she really that crazy  ???

Or, is she actually a friend of the interviewer, and going along with his set up, sending herself up as a joke between them, in the process  ???

Original Quill wrote:

WhoseYourWolfie wrote:

Didge wrote:




She is off the charts whackadoodle

While I was watching that, I started to wonder, though :

Is she really that crazy  ???

Or, is she actually a friend of the interviewer, and going along with his set up, sending herself up as a joke between them, in the process  ???

Well, it's Tucker Carlson.  He thinks he's making an underlying point by hyperbolic ridiculousness.  The problem with him is, beneath all humor needs to be a bit of truth.  Underneath his, is a bit of bigotry.

veya_victaous wrote:

Original Quill wrote:

Well, it's Tucker Carlson.  He thinks he's making an underlying point by hyperbolic ridiculousness.  The problem with him is, beneath all humor needs to be a bit of truth.  Underneath his, is a bit of bigotry.

Even though that is totally a contrived setup, the interviewer seems crazier than her
he is hung up on 'Mail' sounding like Male
talk about a dumb ass

the examples she used like man-made being synthetic and mailman being mail-carrier are hardly out there ideas and are actually just more accurate

veya_victaous wrote:

Didge wrote:

veya_victaous wrote:

Bullshit alert

The word human, does not come from the Latin word Humanus

gelico wrote:

Didge wrote:

Bullshit alert

The word human, does not come from the Latin word Humanus

It actually does, didge

both homo and humanus are old Latin

Didge wrote:

veya_victaous wrote:

Original Quill wrote:

Well, it's Tucker Carlson.  He thinks he's making an underlying point by hyperbolic ridiculousness.  The problem with him is, beneath all humor needs to be a bit of truth.  Underneath his, is a bit of bigotry.

Even though that is totally a contrived setup, the interviewer seems crazier than her
he is hung up on 'Mail' sounding like Male
talk about a dumb ass

the examples she used like man-made being synthetic and mailman being mail-carrier are hardly out there ideas and are actually just more accurate

How is he hung up?

All he did was rightly expose how daft this is

So if a man is a mail carrier, is he not a mailman?

That a woman, is not a mailwoman?

She stated only about the term "man" being done away with from words.

Even as i said, person, has son within.

So how are you now going to run sports events as people defined as person?

You then render women having to compete against men in many events they would never hope to even make the finals of in many events.

Its the left not understanding that there is in reality a bioloigical difference between men and women

You see this is what happens when people try to make people equal. They are then not free.

What you have is laws that protect equality, not try to make people equal, when everyone is not individually equal. Its this kind of absurd pipe dream that has seen countless suffer under Communist regimes

Didge wrote:

gelico wrote:

Didge wrote:

Bullshit alert

The word human, does not come from the Latin word Humanus

It actually does, didge

both homo and humanus are old Latin

No it does not, explain to me how the first known use of the word Humanus, claimed to be derived from the word Humus, appears first?

Have you looked at the old Anglo-Norman and Middle French humain?

There is so many derivatives on this that come from Homo, not homanus

ORIGIN

late Middle English humaine, from Old French humain(e), from Latin humanus, from homo ‘man, human being’. The present spelling became usual in the 18th cent.; compare with humane.

veya_victaous wrote:

Didge wrote:

How is he hung up?

All he did was rightly expose how daft this is

So if a man is a mail carrier, is he not a mailman?

That a woman, is not a mailwoman?

She stated only about the term "man" being done away with from words.

Even as i said, person, has son within.

So how are you now going to run sports events as people defined as person?

You then render women having to compete against men in many events they would never hope to even make the finals of in many events.

Its the left not understanding that there is in reality a bioloigical difference between men and women

You see this is what happens when people try to make people equal. They are then not free.

What you have is laws that protect equality, not try to make people equal, when everyone is not individually equal. Its this kind of absurd pipe dream that has seen countless suffer under Communist regimes

so you really don't get the ACTUAL point not the Fox news nonsense do you?

Mailman or Mailwoman are equal as wrong as the point is to De-gender the occupation.

You whole post rather goes off an a tangent that is REALLY the problem.
there is no problem with making communication more accurate by removing gendered terminology from genderless occupations. in the case of Mankind it does actually have a basis in the sexist mindset of the past, changing that is a good thing.
the Real problem is the over the top, insane and Cuckoo reactions of Right whingers to people suggesting we make IMPROVEMENTS to society and making it more inclusive. just read your post, a complete wackadoodle reaction claiming that if we start saying humankind instead 0of mankind were are goign to be Stalin, and the Idiocy that left don't know there is biological difference and the FALSE claim that promoting equal opportunity is somehow suggesting that everyone is Literally the same without difference.

Your last post was far more Insane and devoid of reality than even the fake Left winger parody on FOX news            

veya_victaous wrote:

Didge wrote:

No it does not, explain to me how the first known use of the word Humanus, claimed to be derived from the word Humus, appears first?

Have you looked at the old Anglo-Norman and Middle French humain?

There is so many derivatives on this that come from Homo, not homanus

LOL you got that from a BIBLE site
the site is WRONG
http://www.truthseekertimes.ca/tb/truebible0005.html



From Oxford Dictionary

ORIGIN

late Middle English humaine, from Old French humain(e), from Latin humanus, from homo ‘man, human being’. The present spelling became usual in the 18th cent.; compare with humane.

and Old French is a Romantic Language derived from old Latin