If sharia law ruled in Britain would gays be hung??

smelly_bandit wrote:

PhilDidge wrote:Being able to spell is not a sign of intelligence Andy and judging by many of your posts it is clear you lack intellect, which is funny because now every time you make an absurd claim I shall call you thick, I shall do as you do with people who make an error.

Tell korben how he is cheating didge, tell him he should just man up

Come on let's see you own your opinions

PhilDidge wrote:

smelly_bandit wrote:

Tell korben how he is cheating didge, tell him he should just man up

Come on let's see you own your opinions

Ah but he has a condition, thus I see no issue with that, you though have no excuse

 :D

smelly_bandit wrote:

PhilDidge wrote:


Ah but he has a condition, thus I see no issue with that, you though have no excuse

 :D

So now you're backing down

You said to me on flap when we were talking about blacks being inferior, that anyone who uses things like spell checkers are cheating

Korben uses spell check so according to you, he is cheating

PhilDidge wrote:Being able to spell is not a sign of intelligence Andy and judging by many of your posts it is clear you lack intellect, which is funny because now every time you make an absurd claim I shall call you thick, I shall do as you do with people who make an error.

BigAndy9 wrote:

PhilDidge wrote:Being able to spell is not a sign of intelligence Andy and judging by many of your posts it is clear you lack intellect, which is funny because now every time you make an absurd claim I shall call you thick, I shall do as you do with people who make an error.

Excellent - let us start with this one then.

Korben is a pathetic man who has made up a very commonly used excuse these days - that he has a "medical problem".
Your evidence that he has made this up? None, 

He thinks that more intelligent people such as myself will take pity on him and not say anything.  He even thinks it will give him some sort of modern kudos.
Again your evidence for your assumptions? None

It won't, behind closed doors, even the most liberal wishy-washy pleb will look down on him.
Really, seems more like you are throwing your dummies out over nothing and wish to make something personal with another poster over this  

Sorry for saying it as it is, but at least you have the "thick" word to cleanse the thread!

PhilDidge wrote:

smelly_bandit wrote:

So now you're backing down

You said to me on flap when we were talking about blacks being inferior, that anyone who uses things like spell checkers are cheating

Korben uses spell check so according to you, he is cheating

There are exceptions to the rules on many things, so funny how you get so wound up..
He has Dyslexia, thus it is find he uses one.
It comes to this that smelly loses so many debates he has to clutch straws on something as this, hilarious

 :D

smelly_bandit wrote:

PhilDidge wrote:


There are exceptions to the rules on many things, so funny how you get so wound up..
He has Dyslexia, thus it is find he uses one.
It comes to this that smelly loses so many debates he has to clutch straws on something as this, hilarious

 :D

Drop it like its hot didge

I do enjoy making you abandon your standpoint

BigAndy9 wrote:

PhilDidge wrote:Being able to spell is not a sign of intelligence Andy and judging by many of your posts it is clear you lack intellect, which is funny because now every time you make an absurd claim I shall call you thick, I shall do as you do with people who make an error.

Excellent - let us start with this one then.

Korben is a pathetic man who has made up a very commonly used excuse these days - that he has a "medical problem".

He thinks that more intelligent people such as myself will take pity on him and not say anything.  He even thinks it will give him some sort of modern kudos.

It won't, behind closed doors, even the most liberal wishy-washy pleb will look down on him.

Sorry for saying it as it is, but at least you have the "thick" word to cleanse the thread!

PhilDidge wrote:

smelly_bandit wrote:

Drop it like its hot didge

I do enjoy making you abandon your standpoint

Drop what my view points stands and like many things has exceptions to the rules ha ha

 :D 

PhilDidge wrote:

BigAndy9 wrote:

Excellent - let us start with this one then.

Korben is a pathetic man who has made up a very commonly used excuse these days - that he has a "medical problem".
Your evidence that he has made this up? None, 

He thinks that more intelligent people such as myself will take pity on him and not say anything.  He even thinks it will give him some sort of modern kudos.
Again your evidence for your assumptions? None

It won't, behind closed doors, even the most liberal wishy-washy pleb will look down on him.
Really, seems more like you are throwing your dummies out over nothing and wish to make something personal with another poster over this  

Sorry for saying it as it is, but at least you have the "thick" word to cleanse the thread!

Well as you make absurd notions on minorities or foreigners without using any dependence on empirical evidence and testable explanations, by your own logic, that would make you very thick?
Agreed

BigAndy9 wrote:

PhilDidge wrote:

Well as you make absurd notions on minorities or foreigners without using any dependence on empirical evidence and testable explanations, by your own logic, that would make you very thick?
Agreed

Your evidence he isn't making it up didge?

That's the problem in an extreme-liberal country such as ours - and it has gotten us where we are now - everybody on benefits, criminals running riot, nobody ever punished and if you dare try talking common sense - those on the make will start crying and all the liberals will tell you off for being a nasty pastie.

heavenly father wrote:any way if sharia law ruled in Britain, which was the whole point of the thread, would gays be hung like in the many countries that use sharia law?

heavenly father wrote:

Korben Dallas wrote:
Actual the question is
could it happen AGAIN in Britain

Sodomy was historically known in England and Wales as buggery, and is usually interpreted as referring to anal intercourse between two males or a male and a female. In England and Wales buggery was made a felony by the Buggery Act in 1533, during the reign of Henry VIII. The punishment for those convicted was the death penalty until 1861. James Pratt and John Smith were the last two to be executed for sodomy in 1835

interesting, does that law still stand.

smelly_bandit wrote:

Korben Dallas wrote:
As it says in the post
The punishment for those convicted was the death penalty until 1861

So that would be No

However you could still be imprisoned

so basically the law was for sodomy not homosexuality, and your contribution is utterly irrelevant  

Beekeeper wrote:

heavenly father wrote:

interesting, does that law still stand.

  

IT is still on the books down in the state of Victoria ~ though it probably hasn't been enforced in over a century...

I only know this, because it was in the newspaper here last week that the Victorian parliament is currently looking at finally expunging it from their Law books..

It was also only in the last couple of decades that Tasmania removed it from their state Laws.


ARE YOU British citizens aware that less than a decade ago, an Englishman was still allowed to belt his wife once a day, and twice on Sundays ~ for the express purpose of simply "keeping her in line.." !                      

Beekeeper wrote:

smelly_bandit wrote:

so basically the law was for sodomy not homosexuality, and your contribution is utterly irrelevant  

  

Smelly once again proves himself to be...

WELL..    Everything that's typically the "smelly_bum_bandit" !

 ::dedhrs::  ::happ::   ::drnkpst::              ::smthg::

Beekeeper wrote:

heavenly father wrote:

interesting, does that law still stand.

  

IT is still on the books down in the state of Victoria ~ though it probably hasn't been enforced in over a century...

I only know this, because it was in the newspaper here last week that the Victorian parliament is currently looking at finally expunging it from their Law books..

It was also only in the last couple of decades that Tasmania removed it from their state Laws.


ARE YOU British citizens aware that less than a decade ago, an Englishman was still allowed to belt his wife once a day, and twice on Sundays ~ for the express purpose of simply "keeping her in line.." !                      

smelly_bandit wrote:

Beekeeper wrote:
  

IT is still on the books down in the state of Victoria ~ though it probably hasn't been enforced in over a century...

I only know this, because it was in the newspaper here last week that the Victorian parliament is currently looking at finally expunging it from their Law books..

It was also only in the last couple of decades that Tasmania removed it from their state Laws.


ARE YOU British citizens aware that less than a decade ago, an Englishman was still allowed to belt his wife once a day, and twice on Sundays ~ for the express purpose of simply "keeping her in line.." !                      

are you aware that thousands of years ago someone once took a shit in the middle of the desert somewhere??

and are you aware that that shit he took was more capable of intelligent conversation than you are

Beekeeper wrote:

smelly_bandit wrote:

are you aware that thousands of years ago someone once took a shit in the middle of the desert somewhere??

and are you aware that that shit he took was more capable of intelligent conversation than you are

  

SHOW US ALL WHAT A FILTHY AND DISGUSTING EXCUSE FOR A HUMAN BEING YOU TRULY ARE, SMELLY...

POSTING YOUR TYPICAL DETRITUS ON HERE ~ AND STILL YOU ATTEMPT TO PASS YOURSELF OFF AS AN ADULT...     

WHILE THIS KIND OF SNEAKY PUERILE CRAP SHOWS YOUR TRUE NATURE...

WHO RECKONS SMELLY COULD WELL BE THE NEXT PERSON TO BE BANNED FROM HERE ???         

smelly_bandit wrote:

Beekeeper wrote:

  

SHOW US ALL WHAT A FILTHY AND DISGUSTING EXCUSE FOR A HUMAN BEING YOU TRULY ARE, SMELLY...

POSTING YOUR TYPICAL DETRITUS ON HERE ~ AND STILL YOU ATTEMPT TO PASS YOURSELF OFF AS AN ADULT...     

WHILE THIS KIND OF SNEAKY PUERILE CRAP SHOWS YOUR TRUE NATURE...

WHO RECKONS SMELLY COULD WELL BE THE NEXT PERSON TO BE BANNED FROM HERE ???         

dry your eyes mate

we got enough flooding here in the UK without your tears adding to the mix

smelly_bandit wrote:

Beekeeper wrote:

  

SHOW US ALL WHAT A FILTHY AND DISGUSTING EXCUSE FOR A HUMAN BEING YOU TRULY ARE, SMELLY...

POSTING YOUR TYPICAL DETRITUS ON HERE ~ AND STILL YOU ATTEMPT TO PASS YOURSELF OFF AS AN ADULT...     

WHILE THIS KIND OF SNEAKY PUERILE CRAP SHOWS YOUR TRUE NATURE...

WHO RECKONS SMELLY COULD WELL BE THE NEXT PERSON TO BE BANNED FROM HERE ???         

dry your eyes mate

we got enough flooding here in the UK without your tears adding to the mix