Gay paedophile lovers abused boys in flat.

Ben_Reilly wrote:

heavenly father wrote:

it sounds reasonable... :D 

That would be pretty stupid, actually. But wow, interesting how you guys talk about going so far as murdering gay people -- you must REALLY hate them :D:D:D

heavenly father wrote:not enough to egg their homes but i guess some people can control themselves.

Ben_Reilly wrote:I was just saying, funny how your mind went there ...

    

Ben_Reilly wrote:I was just saying, funny how your mind went there ...

    

heavenly father wrote:

Ben_Reilly wrote:I was just saying, funny how your mind went there ...

    

Again normal people can dislike something and not yet stoop to breaking the law to try and show their disgust... :D 

Ben_Reilly wrote:

heavenly father wrote:

Again normal people can dislike something and not yet stoop to breaking the law to try and show their disgust... :D 

No, they have to stoop to changing the law, in order to oppress the right of gay people to marry. Yeah, that's so much better than egging a house.

heavenly father wrote:

Ben_Reilly wrote:

heavenly father wrote:

Again normal people can dislike something and not yet stoop to breaking the law to try and show their disgust... :D 

No, they have to stoop to changing the law, in order to oppress the right of gay people to marry. Yeah, that's so much better than egging a house.

they never changed the law it just never got on the board.

Ben_Reilly wrote:

heavenly father wrote:

they never changed the law it just never got on the board.

No, you and I both know that UKIP opposes marriage equality; indeed they publish it on their website.

Ben_Reilly wrote:OK, just to throw a little cold water on some of the nonsensical claims being made in this thread:

1) There is no evidence that homosexuals abuse children at a higher rate than heterosexuals (I posted the link to this earlier). Therefore there is no rational reason to discriminate among couples seeking to adopt children.

2) There is no way to prevent all child abuse, just as there is no way to prevent all crime. Some children will be abused whether they're living with a gay couple, a straight couple, living with their biological parents or living with other relatives, because there is no category of adult that has been proven to have no child abusers within it. It's an ugly fact of life and the best we can do is to promote awareness of the warning signs that a child is being abused.

3) The stuff I've been saying about British people recently was obviously satire and intended to wind up the racist maggots on this site. I can't believe anyone could look at those posts with any familiarity with this site and conclude anything else.

heavenly father wrote:

Ben_Reilly wrote:

heavenly father wrote:

they never changed the law it just never got on the board.

No, you and I both know that UKIP opposes marriage equality; indeed they publish it on their website.

What they oppose is a matter of conscience nothing else, would you prefer they egged gays but didn't oppose their marriage..

Shady wrote:

Ben_Reilly wrote:OK, just to throw a little cold water on some of the nonsensical claims being made in this thread:

1) There is no evidence that homosexuals abuse children at a higher rate than heterosexuals (I posted the link to this earlier). Therefore there is no rational reason to discriminate among couples seeking to adopt children.

2) There is no way to prevent all child abuse, just as there is no way to prevent all crime. Some children will be abused whether they're living with a gay couple, a straight couple, living with their biological parents or living with other relatives, because there is no category of adult that has been proven to have no child abusers within it. It's an ugly fact of life and the best we can do is to promote awareness of the warning signs that a child is being abused.

3) The stuff I've been saying about British people recently was obviously satire and intended to wind up the racist maggots on this site. I can't believe anyone could look at those posts with any familiarity with this site and conclude anything else.

Ben,you wouldn't about satire if it fucked you up the arse.....and that's because you're a yank.

Similarly,you wouldn't know a thing about humour if it fucked you up the arse....and that's because you're a yank.

heavenly father wrote:I don't think anyone ever said gays are more likely abuse children, I still believe the myth that gay peado's do not exist is dangerous as it gives a false sense of security with men being safe around boys.

Ben_Reilly wrote:

heavenly father wrote:I don't think anyone ever said gays are more likely abuse children, I still believe the myth that gay peado's do not exist is dangerous as it gives a false sense of security with men being safe around boys.

Nobody says there are no gay people who abuse children. The fact is that they abuse children at no higher rate than straight people do.

ALLAKAKA wrote:

Ben_Reilly wrote:

heavenly father wrote:I don't think anyone ever said gays are more likely abuse children, I still believe the myth that gay peado's do not exist is dangerous as it gives a false sense of security with men being safe around boys.

Nobody says there are no gay people who abuse children. The fact is that they abuse children at no higher rate than straight people do.

And when a specific group commit certain crimes at a Higher rate than other groups , then this is a problem within that group.

Ben_Reilly wrote:

ALLAKAKA wrote:



And when a specific group commit certain crimes at a Higher rate than other groups , then this is a problem within that group.

You mean like how white people commit far more financial crimes and fraud than any other ethnicity; or how there are far more white serial killers than any other ethnicity?

Ben_Reilly wrote:Or how white people are always the ones running into big crowds and shooting people indiscriminately?

Ben_Reilly wrote:

heavenly father wrote:I don't think anyone ever said gays are more likely abuse children, I still believe the myth that gay peado's do not exist is dangerous as it gives a false sense of security with men being safe around boys.

Nobody says there are no gay people who abuse children. The fact is that they abuse children at no higher rate than straight people do.

ALLAKAKA wrote:

Ben_Reilly wrote:Or how white people are always the ones running into big crowds and shooting people indiscriminately?

            9 / 11

heavenly father wrote:

Ben_Reilly wrote:

heavenly father wrote:I don't think anyone ever said gays are more likely abuse children, I still believe the myth that gay peado's do not exist is dangerous as it gives a false sense of security with men being safe around boys.

Nobody says there are no gay people who abuse children. The fact is that they abuse children at no higher rate than straight people do.

so gay peado's exist excellent,i'm pleased that has been established.

Ben_Reilly wrote:

heavenly father wrote:

so gay peado's exist excellent,i'm pleased that has been established.

When was it not established?

PhilDidge wrote:

Ben_Reilly wrote:

When was it not established?

Ben you are asking the wrong questions, this is a born again Christian that believes you can do as you please because all his future wrongs are forgiven just by believing in Jesus.
Ask him what forgiveness is or even love?

heavenly father wrote:good to know phil hasn't changed..lol

heavenly father wrote:good to know phil hasn't changed..lol

heavenly father wrote:so we now know we have gay peados i suppose that is a break through.
by the way excalibur is one of my favourite films..lol

Ben_Reilly wrote:

heavenly father wrote:so we now know we have gay peados i suppose that is a break through.
by the way excalibur is one of my favourite films..lol

Again, can you show where anyone claimed they do not?

"I never stated that you cannot have homosexual padeo's, what I showed is both HF and allakaka think abusing a boy is homosexuality, when in many cases it is not."

Ben_Reilly wrote:Phil wrote here in this thread:

"I never stated that you cannot have homosexual padeo's, what I showed is both HF and allakaka think abusing a boy is homosexuality, when in many cases it is not."

He's right, I just read each of his posts in this thread and he never stated that it's impossible for gay people to molest children.

Ben_Reilly wrote:Yes, it's true that not every man who sexually abuses a boy is a homosexual. Some are, some are not.

heavenly father wrote:

Ben_Reilly wrote:Yes, it's true that not every man who sexually abuses a boy is a homosexual. Some are, some are not.

a boy maybe not, if the preference is always boys then i would argue otherwise.

Catman wrote:

heavenly father wrote:

a boy maybe not, if the preference is always boys then i would argue otherwise.

What about a paedophile, that mostly abuses girls then, is he a straight paedophile?

IMO paedophelia has nothing to do with any kind of sexuality, it's just about exerting power and control over a singular individual, i think that's it's similar to people that abuse cats and dogs, on the lower level.

   

Ben_Reilly wrote:I disagree, I think research is showing that pedophilia is a sexual orientation. It's just one we can't let people indulge in, because to do so would be to allow rape.

heavenly father wrote:

Ben_Reilly wrote:I disagree, I think research is showing that pedophilia is a sexual orientation. It's just one we can't let people indulge in, because to do so would be to allow rape.

it has to be stopped to keep children safe and i think it does have a sexual orientation as you say.

Catman wrote:

heavenly father wrote:

it has to be stopped to keep children safe and i think it does have a sexual orientation as you say.

How does it involve a sexual orientation, when some fathers are in a straight relationship, but then abuse male sons?

heavenly father wrote:

Ben_Reilly wrote:I disagree, I think research is showing that pedophilia is a sexual orientation. It's just one we can't let people indulge in, because to do so would be to allow rape.

it has to be stopped to keep children safe and i think it does have a sexual orientation as you say.

veya_victaous wrote:

heavenly father wrote:

it has to be stopped to keep children safe and i think it does have a sexual orientation as you say.

Again the MOST consistent Abuse of Children is By RELIGIOUS MEN. I say thou protest too Much Father. You are of the group MOST likely to rape little boys and girls and You spend so much effort trying to spread a false Image of Homosexuals as Paedophiles.