Women’s March London: Thousands Take To The Streets In Startling Show Of Strength

eddie wrote:If people didn't vote then they aren't included in the numbers! It's really that simple.
You can't say that those who didn't vote would've voted to stay - doesn't matter what they say after the event.

The majority of people who voted, voted to leave. No other answer is needed.

Tommy Monk wrote:

Thorin wrote:



I agree, hence why it should only be about those voting to leave to be the ones voting, requiring a 50%+ majority

Of those who voted... 52% voted leave!!!


That is over 50%... so therefore a majority over 50%.

Raggamuffin wrote:

eddie wrote:If people didn't vote then they aren't included in the numbers! It's really that simple.
You can't say that those who didn't vote would've voted to stay - doesn't matter what they say after the event.

The majority of people who voted, voted to leave. No other answer is needed.

Exactly. These polls after the event aren't going to be accurate because those who didn't vote might have all kinds of reasons for saying they want to stay now, and they might have felt differently at the time of the vote - if they were at all bothered. If they weren't bothered at the time of the vote and then decided later that they were, well it's too late.

Tommy Monk wrote:Only the votes that are cast are the votes that count dodge...

Tommy Monk wrote:An even smaller minority voted to remain...


Leave won!!!

Thorin wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

Exactly. These polls after the event aren't going to be accurate because those who didn't vote might have all kinds of reasons for saying they want to stay now, and they might have felt differently at the time of the vote - if they were at all bothered. If they weren't bothered at the time of the vote and then decided later that they were, well it's too late.

So if he next general election is based on returning to the EU, will their vote not matter?

You see, you far right worshipers make me laugh

Not only can you fail to understand basic maths, you think a referendum is set in stone, wrongly think that 38% of the populous voting to leave is a majority, claiming the people has spoken and as sen its actually a minority. You then claim even more gibberish claiming the polls are inaccurate off even more unfounded claims. It shows how desperate the leave voters really truly are on this issue.

Raggamuffin wrote:

Thorin wrote:


So if he next general election is based on returning to the EU, will their vote not matter?

You see, you far right worshipers make me laugh

Not only can you fail to understand basic maths, you think a referendum is set in stone, wrongly think that 38% of the populous voting to leave is a majority, claiming the people has spoken and as sen its actually a minority. You then claim even more gibberish claiming the polls are inaccurate off even more unfounded claims. It shows how desperate the leave voters really truly are on this issue.

Assuming that I'm a "far right worshipper" because I think it's impractical to keep on having referendums is not logical Didge. Discounting the people who didn't bother to vote doesn't make me a "far right worshipper either", and neither does claiming that polls which don't ask the right questions are inaccurate.

Why would leave voters be desperate? They won.

Thorin wrote:

Tommy Monk wrote:An even smaller minority voted to remain...


Leave won!!!

But the majority of the people of the Uk did not vote to leave
It was 38%, so as you claim the people have no spoken
Leave could take a big kick up he arse by he courts this week

Tommy Monk wrote:

Thorin wrote:


But the majority of the people of the Uk did not vote to leave
It was 38%, so as you claim the people have no spoken
Leave could take a big kick up he arse by he courts this week

Even less voted to remain!!!


Stop twisting oliver!


Only the votes cast are counted... and result is based on those.

Thorin wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

Assuming that I'm a "far right worshipper" because I think it's impractical to keep on having referendums is not logical Didge. Discounting the people who didn't bother to vote doesn't make me a "far right worshipper either", and neither does claiming that polls which don't ask the right questions are inaccurate.

Why would leave voters be desperate? They won.

There is no assumption Rags, I am doing this based off your views
Its not up to you to decide whether they are impractical
I proved today the one held was impractical and undemocratic, as only 38% of the populace votd to leave
They are desperate as th courts are going to rule against the Government this week

Tommy Monk wrote:Going by votes counted even less voted to stay...

Raggamuffin wrote:

Thorin wrote:


There is no assumption Rags, I am doing this based off your views
Its not up to you to decide whether they are impractical
I proved today the one held was impractical and undemocratic, as only 38% of the populace votd to leave
They are desperate as th courts are going to rule against the Government this week

Then your powers of reasoning are flawed Didge. It's not up to you to decide that it would be practical. In fact, it stands to reason that it wouldn't be. You can't keep on having another one and another until you get the result you want. You could end up with hundreds of them. The one we had was not impractical. Everyone who was registered to vote had the chance to do so, and some of them failed to do so.

So do you really think that MPs will risk going against their constituents and voting to stay? They would be voted out in the next election.

Tommy Monk wrote:What is wrong with you dodge...!?


There was a very well publicised vote on an issue... all the people who wanted to vote and who were eligible to vote, did cast their vote... the issue was decided by the result of the vote!


Result was majority in favour of leaving eu.

Raggamuffin wrote:Didge, you're being childish - try to control yourself and stop posting silly gifs.

Tommy Monk wrote:And an even smaller number voted to remain... so leave won.

Thorin wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

Then your powers of reasoning are flawed Didge. It's not up to you to decide that it would be practical. In fact, it stands to reason that it wouldn't be. You can't keep on having another one and another until you get the result you want. You could end up with hundreds of them. The one we had was not impractical. Everyone who was registered to vote had the chance to do so, and some of them failed to do so.

So do you really think that MPs will risk going against their constituents and voting to stay? They would be voted out in the next election.

Nothing flawed about them Rags
We keep having general elections every 4 years, so that dispels your view point, because we keep constantly changing Governments. IF people want to vote that many times that is up to them
How are they risking going against their constituents, when they represent 38% of the voting populace?
So 38% is going to wipe them out at the next election?

Raggamuffin wrote:

Thorin wrote:


Nothing flawed about them Rags
We keep having general elections every 4 years, so that dispels your view point, because we keep constantly changing Governments. IF people want to vote that many times that is up to them
How are they risking going against their constituents, when they represent 38% of the voting populace?
So 38% is going to wipe them out at the next election?

In constituencies where the leave vote prevailed, an MP going against them could lose them their seat. In addition, some people who didn't even vote to leave might not trust them because they're not representing their constituents.

Thorin wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:Didge, you're being childish - try to control yourself and stop posting silly gifs.

By laughing at your both your poor maths and views?

I think its hysterical, especially your maths

Thorin wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

In constituencies where the leave vote prevailed, an MP going against them could lose them their seat. In addition, some people who didn't even vote to leave might not trust them because they're not representing their constituents.

But you are under the false presumption that Brexit is the biggest priority for people

Its not

Raggamuffin wrote:

Thorin wrote:


By laughing at your both your poor maths and views?

I think its hysterical, especially your maths

Didge, get real. If there was another referendum, nobody would know in advance what the turnout would be, and nobody would know how many would vote which way. Do you really think that any Government would keep on having referendums until they got the result you wanted? That's just laughable and you're just losing it now.

Raggamuffin wrote:

Thorin wrote:


But you are under the false presumption that Brexit is the biggest priority for people

Its not

That's not the point. The point is that people want to trust their MP.

Thorin wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

Didge, get real. If there was another referendum, nobody would know in advance what the turnout would be, and nobody would know how many would vote which way. Do you really think that any Government would keep on having referendums until they got the result you wanted? That's just laughable and you're just losing it now.

Based on numerous polls a second referendum would vote to remain
You do not even need to have one, parties can make it a priority to leave, join, remain in the next general election

Tommy Monk wrote:

Thorin wrote:


Based on numerous polls a second referendum would vote to remain
You do not even need to have one, parties can make it a priority to leave, join, remain in the next general election

We never voted to give away any of our sovereign democratic powers to the eu... these were stolen bit by bit... once we have left eu and regained them all... nobody in their right mind would be voting to give any away in future.

Tommy Monk wrote:

https://youtu.be/Nc3Z10-bOYA

Counting the uncountable