So - who won't see Christmas 2017

by Andy Mon Dec 26, 2016 8:41 am

Based on events of 2016.
Bruce Forsyth
Gordon Lightfoot
Prince Phillip
Paul Gasgoigne
Trump.
Footballer Kenny Sansom.
David Attenborough.
Roger Whitaker
Clint Eastwood.
Dick van Dyke
Shane McGowan
Some are based on lifestyle, some age and a couple of unlucky onea.
This is NOT a wish list.

by Raggamuffin Mon Dec 26, 2016 10:40 am

I think this thread is in bad taste even if it's not a wish list.

by nicko Mon Dec 26, 2016 11:27 am

Handy has never shied away from wishing people dead, if not blatantly, his hints are obvious !

by HoratioTarr Mon Dec 26, 2016 11:53 am

Handy Andy wrote:Based on events of 2016.
Bruce Forsyth
Gordon Lightfoot
Prince Phillip
Paul Gasgoigne
Trump.
Footballer Kenny Sansom.
David Attenborough.
Roger Whitaker
Clint Eastwood.
Dick van Dyke
Shane McGowan
Some are based on lifestyle, some age and a couple of unlucky onea.
This is NOT a wish list.

A bit morbid but interesting list. I guess it will be interesting too, to compare this next year. My predictions. All members of the Rolling Stones. cyclops

by eddie Mon Dec 26, 2016 12:44 pm

I had George Michael in a death pool last year..... Sad

Feel bad now.

by Raggamuffin Mon Dec 26, 2016 12:45 pm

eddie wrote:I had George Michael in a death pool last year.....
Feel bad now.

A death pool? WTF is wrong with people?

by eddie Mon Dec 26, 2016 12:48 pm

Rags sometimes people think thoughts but don't say them out loud.
Does that make them any different to the ones that do?

I often think Prince Phillip hasn't got long....so if I think it or type it, what's the difference?

by Raggamuffin Mon Dec 26, 2016 12:51 pm

eddie wrote:Rags sometimes people think thoughts but don't say them out loud.
Does that make them any different to the ones that do?

I often think Prince Phillip hasn't got long....so if I think it or type it, what's the difference?

Yes, it does make them different. A death pool FFS! It reminds me of when people were betting on when Jade Goody would die. It's sick, and I can't believe people say this stuff on public forums or the internet in general. How would you feel if you read that someone was betting that you'd die in the next year? It's one thing to discuss it quietly at home or in a pub, but publishing a list of people you bet will die in the next year is quite another matter. Does it make you feel good that you were right?

by eddie Mon Dec 26, 2016 12:57 pm

Discussing it in a pub and discussing it on a forum - no different.
How would I feel if people bet on me dying? No way at all to be honest? It's not a curse it's a thought and I don't much care.
Do I feel good I was right? Nope.
Do I think my opinion or thought contributed to his death in any way? Nope.

This really is a pointless discussion rags.
People that think something and don't say it, are no different to those who do, lets face it.

by Raggamuffin Mon Dec 26, 2016 1:01 pm

eddie wrote:Discussing it in a pub and discussing it on a forum - no different.
How would I feel if people bet on me dying? No way at all to be honest? It's not a curse it's a thought and I don't much care.
Do I feel good I was right? Nope.
Do I think my opinion or thought contributed to his death in any way? Nope.

This really is a pointless discussion rags.
People that think something and don't say it, are no different to those who do, lets face it.

Of course it's different! This is a public forum, and people are betting on who will die next? If you think that's normal or in any way acceptable, well ...

I never suggested that someone can make someone die by thinking they will die. It does give people a chance to boast that they were right though, doesn't it?

by Guest Mon Dec 26, 2016 1:03 pm

Handy Andy wrote:Based on events of 2016.
Bruce Forsyth
Gordon Lightfoot
Prince Phillip & the Queen
Paul Gasgoigne
~~Trump.~~ OH, NOOOO...that would leave us with VP - Mike Pence; even worse!
Footballer Kenny Sansom.
David Attenborough.
Roger Whitaker
Clint Eastwood.
Dick van Dyke
Shane McGowan
Some are based on lifestyle, some age and a couple of unlucky onea.
This is NOT a wish list.

Sadly, I see our stoic dear Betty White being on this list. I love you

But it's just mind boggling to think about those that aren't up in their late 80's - 90's succumbing to some horrid accident or illness. This past year has been just awful.

by eddie Mon Dec 26, 2016 1:04 pm

Yeah I suppose so rags....I have boasted all day about his death and I'm so glad I'm right. Rolling Eyes

Whatever. If you think it or say it, makes no difference to an outcome. Just that one is braver to own what they say and I don't feel shamed about anything I say. I don't feel the need to secretly whisper my opinions.
And for the record I didn't start the dead pool thing - I just gave an opinion.
Sorry about that.

by Raggamuffin Mon Dec 26, 2016 1:06 pm

eddie wrote:Yeah I suppose so rags....I have boasted all day about his death and I'm so glad I'm right.

Whatever. If you think it or say it, makes no difference to an outcome. Just that one is braver to own what they say and I don't feel shamed about anything I say.
Sorry about that.

That is not at all the point, and I haven't claimed it does. It's just sick.

by eddie Mon Dec 26, 2016 1:08 pm

Well lots of opinions are sick. Just because you choose not the voice them doesn't make you any better does it?

by Andy Mon Dec 26, 2016 1:09 pm

This topic was discussed on LBC this morning by Katie Hopkins.
A number of listeners phoned to say they had almost wished GM had been ill, so they could show their love and respect whilst he was still alive.
In a morbid sort of way, I can understand that.
When they out of the limelight, celebrities quickly become forgotten.

by Raggamuffin Mon Dec 26, 2016 1:10 pm

eddie wrote:Well lots of opinions are sick. Just because you choose not the voice them doesn't make you any better does it?

Starting a "death pool" is sick. Trying to make out that there's nothing wrong with it is also sick, so yes, on this occasion I do think I'm better.

If one of the people named on this thread dies, will the person who named them find it and boast about being "right"?

by Guest Mon Dec 26, 2016 1:12 pm

Handy Andy wrote:This topic was discussed on LBC this morning by Katie Hopkins.
A number of listeners phoned to say they had almost wished GM had been ill, so they could show their love and respect whilst he was still alive.
In a morbid sort of way, I can understand that.
When they out of the limelight, celebrities quickly become forgotten.

True - True.
BTW - no one is placing BETS on this, we are just discussing the possibilities! Geeze, it gets soooo exhausting the way 'SOME' members just love to TWIST a thread/topic title/a written post around into something that it IS NOT! Rolling Eyes

by Raggamuffin Mon Dec 26, 2016 1:12 pm

Handy Andy wrote:This topic was discussed on LBC this morning by Katie Hopkins.
A number of listeners phoned to say they had almost wished GM had been ill, so they could show their love and respect whilst he was still alive.
In a morbid sort of way, I can understand that.
When they out of the limelight, celebrities quickly become forgotten.

Well that's just absurd too. George Michael was very ill a few years ago, so they had the chance then.

by eddie Mon Dec 26, 2016 1:14 pm

Raggamuffin wrote:
eddie wrote:Well lots of opinions are sick. Just because you choose not the voice them doesn't make you any better does it?

Starting a "death pool" is sick. Trying to make out that there's nothing wrong with it is also sick, so yes, on this occasion I do think I'm better.

If one of the people named on this thread dies, will the person who named them find it and boast about being "right"?

Don't know didn't start the pool and never have, and don't know can't speak for others.
Nothing else to say on the matter without repeating myself and I didn't start this thread either.

by Raggamuffin Mon Dec 26, 2016 1:16 pm

4EVER2 wrote:
Handy Andy wrote:This topic was discussed on LBC this morning by Katie Hopkins.
A number of listeners phoned to say they had almost wished GM had been ill, so they could show their love and respect whilst he was still alive.

Why
In a morbid sort of way, I can understand that.
When they out of the limelight, celebrities quickly become forgotten.

True - True.
BTW - no one is placing BETS on this, we are just discussing the possibilities! Geeze, it gets soooo exhausting the way 'SOME' members just love to TWIST a thread/topic title/a written post around into something that it IS NOT!

Why don't you just go to the bookies and place some bets? You might make a nice profit. Rolling Eyes

by Raggamuffin Mon Dec 26, 2016 1:17 pm

eddie wrote:
Raggamuffin wrote:

Starting a "death pool" is sick. Trying to make out that there's nothing wrong with it is also sick, so yes, on this occasion I do think I'm better.

If one of the people named on this thread dies, will the person who named them find it and boast about being "right"?

Don't know didn't start the pool and never have, and don't know can't speak for others.
Nothing else to say on the matter without repeating myself and I didn't start this thread either.

I didn't say you did start this thread. HA did, and of course you would support him.

by Andy Mon Dec 26, 2016 1:18 pm

Raggamuffin wrote:
eddie wrote:Yeah I suppose so rags....I have boasted all day about his death and I'm so glad I'm right.

Whatever. If you think it or say it, makes no difference to an outcome. Just that one is braver to own what they say and I don't feel shamed about anything I say.
Sorry about that.

That is not at all the point, and I haven't claimed it does. It's just sick.

A lot of opinions (most of) by your banned chum are sick in most peoles eyes too. So sick , the mods and site owner agreed he went too far.
Yet you always supported him.
Most find that sick as well.

by Raggamuffin Mon Dec 26, 2016 1:19 pm

Handy Andy wrote:
Raggamuffin wrote:

That is not at all the point, and I haven't claimed it does. It's just sick.
A lot of opinions (most of) by your banned chum are sick in most peoles eyes too. So sick , the mods and site owner agreed he went too far.
Yet you always supported him.
Most find that sick as well.

Oh, are we changing the subject now?

OK, that's fine by me. Anything but this stupid list which passes for "entertainment" would be good.

by Andy Mon Dec 26, 2016 1:20 pm

Raggamuffin wrote:
eddie wrote:

Don't know didn't start the pool and never have, and don't know can't speak for others.
Nothing else to say on the matter without repeating myself and I didn't start this thread either.

I didn't say you did start this thread. HA did, and of course you would support him.

Haha. Eds and I both know that is bollocks. I have lost count of the number of disagreements we have had.

by Guest Mon Dec 26, 2016 1:21 pm

Raggamuffin wrote:
4EVER2 wrote:
True - True.
BTW - no one is placing BETS on this, we are just discussing the possibilities! Geeze, it gets soooo exhausting the way 'SOME' members just love to TWIST a thread/topic title/a written post around into something that it IS NOT!

Why don't you just go to the bookies and place some bets? You might make a nice profit.

Nope, not what this thread/topic is about ...NOT A POOL - NOT A BETTING TOPIC and to do so in the USA would be a bad - bad thing. The FCC frowns upon such gaming regulations being handled on the Internet; are you trying to get Ben into trouble?
Perhaps, avoiding topics that seem to trigger your anger would be the best thing for you to do ...this is an OPEN COMMUNITY for topics that are of interest for the GROUP; not just what appeases you specifically! So - who won't see Christmas 2017 1858517897

So - who won't see Christmas 2017 1858517897

by eddie Mon Dec 26, 2016 1:26 pm

Raggamuffin wrote:
eddie wrote:
Raggamuffin wrote:

Starting a "death pool" is sick. Trying to make out that there's nothing wrong with it is also sick, so yes, on this occasion I do think I'm better.

If one of the people named on this thread dies, will the person who named them find it and boast about being "right"?

Don't know didn't start the pool and never have, and don't know can't speak for others.
Nothing else to say on the matter without repeating myself and I didn't start this thread either.

I didn't say you did start this thread. HA did, and of course you would support him.

And here we go again!

Can people make up their minds which "side" I'm supposedly on? First I'm "obviously" supporting the RWers then I'm supporting the LWers!????

So - who won't see Christmas 2017 2396444674

So - who won't see Christmas 2017 2396444674

by Raggamuffin Mon Dec 26, 2016 1:27 pm

4EVER2 wrote:
Raggamuffin wrote:

Why don't you just go to the bookies and place some bets? You might make a nice profit.
Nope, not what this thread/topic is about ...NOT A POOL - NOT A BETTING TOPIC and to do so in the USA would be a bad - bad thing. The FCC frowns upon such gaming regulations being handled on the Internet; are you trying to get Ben into trouble?
Perhaps, avoiding topics that seem to trigger your anger would be the best thing for you to do ...this is an OPEN COMMUNITY for topics that are of interest for the GROUP; not just what appeases you specifically!

It's exactly what it is. No money is changing hands, but it's betting on people dying all the same.

If you avoided subjects which triggered your anger, you wouldn't post on this forum at all! You seem to spend all your time getting in a temper about one thing or another.

by eddie Mon Dec 26, 2016 1:27 pm

Handy Andy wrote:
Raggamuffin wrote:
eddie wrote:

Don't know didn't start the pool and never have, and don't know can't speak for others.
Nothing else to say on the matter without repeating myself and I didn't start this thread either.

I didn't say you did start this thread. HA did, and of course you would support him.
Haha. Eds and I both know that is bollocks. I have lost count of the number of disagreements we have had.

To be fair HA it wouldn't matter to me how many times we've disagreed - you've still done nothing Wrong here and I actually agree with both you and 4ever on this thread.

I'm not pathetically biased. I back a poster or idea that I think is right.

by Raggamuffin Mon Dec 26, 2016 1:28 pm

eddie wrote:
Raggamuffin wrote:

I didn't say you did start this thread. HA did, and of course you would support him.

And here we go again!

Can people make up their minds which "side" I'm supposedly on? First I'm "obviously" supporting the RWers then I'm supporting the LWers!????

I didn't mention "sides" or RWs or LWs.

by Raggamuffin Mon Dec 26, 2016 1:28 pm

eddie wrote:
Handy Andy wrote:
Haha. Eds and I both know that is bollocks. I have lost count of the number of disagreements we have had.

To be fair HA it wouldn't matter to me how many times we've disagreed - you've still done nothing Wrong here and I actually agree with both you and 4ever on this thread.

I'm not pathetically biased. I back a poster or idea that I think is right.

You agree with what? Discussing on a public forum who's going to die this year? That's just pathetic.

by eddie Mon Dec 26, 2016 1:36 pm

Well it's a difference of opinion rags, such are debates.

by Guest Mon Dec 26, 2016 1:51 pm

Raggamuffin wrote:
4EVER2 wrote:
Nope, not what this thread/topic is about ...NOT A POOL - NOT A BETTING TOPIC and to do so in the USA would be a bad - bad thing. The FCC frowns upon such gaming regulations being handled on the Internet; are you trying to get Ben into trouble?
Perhaps, avoiding topics that seem to trigger your anger would be the best thing for you to do ...this is an OPEN COMMUNITY for topics that are of interest for the GROUP; not just what appeases you specifically!

It's exactly what it is. No money is changing hands, but it's betting on people dying all the same.

If you avoided subjects which triggered your anger, you wouldn't post on this forum at all! You seem to spend all your time getting in a temper about one thing or another.

So - who won't see Christmas 2017 371740092

You just haven't an emotional clue about SARCASM and how it's utilized to rejoinder those that are so utterly lacking any common sense.
More's the pity for you, little one! So - who won't see Christmas 2017 2035286543

So - who won't see Christmas 2017 2035286543

And again; this topic IS NOT BETTING - no dates - no physical conditions - no guesses asked for WHO/WHAT/WHEN/WHERE/WHY - and absolutely no monetary value has been asked.
You seem to be unaware of what a actual BET is all about ...just say'n; you seem to have gotten out of the wrong side of your bed this BOXING DAY So - who won't see Christmas 2017 2190311264

So - who won't see Christmas 2017 2190311264

by Raggamuffin Mon Dec 26, 2016 1:57 pm

4EVER2 wrote:
Raggamuffin wrote:

It's exactly what it is. No money is changing hands, but it's betting on people dying all the same.

If you avoided subjects which triggered your anger, you wouldn't post on this forum at all! You seem to spend all your time getting in a temper about one thing or another.

You just haven't an emotional clue about SARCASM and how it's utilized to rejoinder those that are so utterly lacking any common sense.
More's the pity for you, little one!
And again; this topic IS NOT BETTING - no dates - no physical conditions - no guesses asked for WHO/WHAT/WHEN/WHERE/WHY - and absolutely no monetary value has been asked.
You seem to be unaware of what a actual BET is all about ...just say'n; you seem to have gotten out of the wrong side of your bed this BOXING DAY

If you're going to play that game, I'll just mention that you seemed to be awfully angry on Christmas day.

Look, I think this thread is sick, and I think anyone who partakes in guessing who's going to die on a public forum is out of order. If you don't like my opinion, that's your problem.

by Guest Mon Dec 26, 2016 2:28 pm

Well, hmmmm ...you're always expressing your power of OPINIONS about everyone else and it's just rather pathetic and silly.

No one has/had an issue on this topic but "YOU" and yet now your twisting that around to try to yank my chain with 'You Seem Very Angry on Christmas Day' = yet another WRONG interapatation from a very narrow minded reading perspective!
Boxing Day, isn't that supposed to be a HAPPY EVENT, are you not HAPPY?

by Raggamuffin Mon Dec 26, 2016 2:36 pm

4EVER2 wrote:Well, hmmmm ...you're always expressing your power of OPINIONS about everyone else and it's just rather pathetic and silly.

No one has/had an issue on this topic but "YOU" and yet now your twisting that around to try to yank my chain with 'You Seem Very Angry on Christmas Day' = yet another WRONG interapatation from a very narrow minded reading perspective!
Boxing Day, isn't that supposed to be a HAPPY EVENT, are you not HAPPY?

What's wrong with having an opinion? Most of the posts on this forum are based on someone's opinion. Why shouldn't I have an issue with this subject? I don't follow the crowd like you, and it's not relevant that others don't agree with me. You started the shite about "Boxing day", so I replied in kind. You sat here on Christmas day getting angry and arguing and ranting.

If you don't like me replying to your provocation, don't start an argument. If you can't take it, don't dish it out. That should be your New Year's resolution.

by HoratioTarr Mon Dec 26, 2016 2:54 pm

Raggamuffin wrote:
4EVER2 wrote:Well, hmmmm ...you're always expressing your power of OPINIONS about everyone else and it's just rather pathetic and silly.

No one has/had an issue on this topic but "YOU" and yet now your twisting that around to try to yank my chain with 'You Seem Very Angry on Christmas Day' = yet another WRONG interapatation from a very narrow minded reading perspective!
Boxing Day, isn't that supposed to be a HAPPY EVENT, are you not HAPPY?

What's wrong with having an opinion? Most of the posts on this forum are based on someone's opinion. Why shouldn't I have an issue with this subject? I don't follow the crowd like you, and it's not relevant that others don't agree with me. You started the shite about "Boxing day", so I replied in kind. You sat here on Christmas day getting angry and arguing and ranting.

If you don't like me replying to your provocation, don't start an argument. If you can't take it, don't dish it out. That should be your New Year's resolution.

You're perfectly entitled to your opinion. I don't personally feel predictions of deaths are wishing it but that's just my slant on it. Wink

by Raggamuffin Mon Dec 26, 2016 2:59 pm

HoratioTarr wrote:
Raggamuffin wrote:

What's wrong with having an opinion? Most of the posts on this forum are based on someone's opinion. Why shouldn't I have an issue with this subject? I don't follow the crowd like you, and it's not relevant that others don't agree with me. You started the shite about "Boxing day", so I replied in kind. You sat here on Christmas day getting angry and arguing and ranting.

If you don't like me replying to your provocation, don't start an argument. If you can't take it, don't dish it out. That should be your New Year's resolution.

You're perfectly entitled to your opinion. I don't personally feel predictions of deaths are wishing it but that's just my slant on it.

I haven't said that!

by magica Mon Dec 26, 2016 3:24 pm

I think our Queen wont see xmas next year, oh but I do hope Im wrong. I hope she goes to 100 like her mum. She always bounces back eh?

by Guest Mon Dec 26, 2016 3:33 pm

Raggamuffin wrote:
4EVER2 wrote:Well, hmmmm ...you're always expressing your power of OPINIONS about everyone else and it's just rather pathetic and silly.

No one has/had an issue on this topic but "YOU" and yet now your twisting that around to try to yank my chain with 'You Seem Very Angry on Christmas Day' = yet another WRONG interapatation from a very narrow minded reading perspective!
Boxing Day, isn't that supposed to be a HAPPY EVENT, are you not HAPPY?

What's wrong with having an opinion? Most of the posts on this forum are based on someone's opinion. Why shouldn't I have an issue with this subject? I don't follow the crowd like you, and it's not relevant that others don't agree with me. You started the shite about "Boxing day", so I replied in kind. You sat here on Christmas day getting angry and arguing and ranting.

If you don't like me replying to your provocation, don't start an argument. If you can't take it, don't dish it out. That should be your New Year's resolution.

Not your first {nor will it be your last} ability to twist the community rules to suit your agenda; posting an opinion about the thread/topic is as we are supposed to do - posting opinions about fellow members {something you've provided me since my first day} is supposed to be against the RULES! Twisted Evil

You seem to be having a really bad - bad day, and this is just one of many topics you've expressed a sour opinion about; I was just wondering why, your so compulsive obsessed with dropping negative comments around if you are that UNHAPPY? So - who won't see Christmas 2017 2190311264

by Guest Mon Dec 26, 2016 3:36 pm

magica wrote:I think our Queen wont see xmas next year, oh but I do hope Im wrong. I hope she goes to 100 like her mum. She always bounces back eh?

Agreed; given the upheaval world wide at this moment in history, I'd hate to see the UK having to pay for a huge funeral process for the Royal Family.
Don't know if the Queen and her hubby are given the 'Flue Vaccine' but since they've both been down & out with some crude ...and given their advanced ages, the flu often takes this age group before the Spring arrives.

by Raggamuffin Mon Dec 26, 2016 3:40 pm

4EVER2 wrote:
Raggamuffin wrote:

What's wrong with having an opinion? Most of the posts on this forum are based on someone's opinion. Why shouldn't I have an issue with this subject? I don't follow the crowd like you, and it's not relevant that others don't agree with me. You started the shite about "Boxing day", so I replied in kind. You sat here on Christmas day getting angry and arguing and ranting.

If you don't like me replying to your provocation, don't start an argument. If you can't take it, don't dish it out. That should be your New Year's resolution.
Not your first {nor will it be your last} ability to twist the community rules to suit your agenda; posting an opinion about the thread/topic is as we are supposed to do - posting opinions about fellow members {something you've provided me since my first day} is supposed to be against the RULES!

You seem to be having a really bad - bad day, and this is just one of many topics you've expressed a sour opinion about; I was just wondering why, your so compulsive obsessed with dropping negative comments around if you are that UNHAPPY?

I haven't twisted any rules. If posting opinions about other members is against the rules, you break those rules every five minutes.

I'm having a perfectly fine day - I just think that people who predict the deaths of others on a public forum are out of order. That's not the same as having a bad day. You're the one who appears to be very unhappy - nearly all your posts are sour and bitter.

by Guest Mon Dec 26, 2016 3:49 pm

Well, that just proves another thing much like your claims about 'FAITH' ...you are WRONG yet again! But we've visited this Opinionated Issue you deem worthy to write and keep shoving at me many - many times before!
Interesting and oddly not like the Christians that 'I' know. So - who won't see Christmas 2017 919144451

So - who won't see Christmas 2017 919144451

by Raggamuffin Mon Dec 26, 2016 3:55 pm

4EVER2 wrote:Well, that just proves another thing much like your claims about 'FAITH' ...you are WRONG yet again! But we've visited this Opinionated Issue you deem worthy to write and keep shoving at me many - many times before!
Interesting and oddly not like the Christians that 'I' know.

Don't start on about my faith - that will only lead to further arguments and to you breaking the rules again. It's not relevant to this thread at all.

by eddie Mon Dec 26, 2016 4:02 pm

Let's get back on topic please.

by Guest Mon Dec 26, 2016 4:14 pm

Raggamuffin wrote:
4EVER2 wrote:
Nope, not what this thread/topic is about ...NOT A POOL - NOT A BETTING TOPIC and to do so in the USA would be a bad - bad thing. The FCC frowns upon such gaming regulations being handled on the Internet; are you trying to get Ben into trouble?
Perhaps, avoiding topics that seem to trigger your anger would be the best thing for you to do ...this is an OPEN COMMUNITY for topics that are of interest for the GROUP; not just what appeases you specifically!

It's exactly what it is. No money is changing hands, but it's betting on people dying all the same.

If you avoided subjects which triggered your anger, you wouldn't post on this forum at all! You seem to spend all your time getting in a temper about one thing or another. = 7:27 am

I'll add you back into my morning meditations ...you seem in dire need of some REAL Ho-Ho-Holiday happy attitude!
Just say'n ...there are those that practice and there are those that do not. grin angel

by Raggamuffin Mon Dec 26, 2016 4:19 pm

4EVER2 wrote:
Raggamuffin wrote:

It's exactly what it is. No money is changing hands, but it's betting on people dying all the same.

If you avoided subjects which triggered your anger, you wouldn't post on this forum at all! You seem to spend all your time getting in a temper about one thing or another. = 7:27 am
I'll add you back into my morning meditations ...you seem in dire need of some REAL Ho-Ho-Holiday happy attitude!
Just say'n ...there are those that practice and there are those that do not.

That post made no sense whatsoever.

by Raggamuffin Mon Dec 26, 2016 4:25 pm

Oh, I see. the last bit was yet another dig at my faith. I've already asked you not to do that - it's against the rules and it's not relevant.

by nicko Mon Dec 26, 2016 4:30 pm

Put me on the list, i'm on the way out Laughing

by Andy Mon Dec 26, 2016 6:13 pm

I would like to see all but one on my list survive for years to come.
No guesses who.

by eddie Mon Dec 26, 2016 11:32 pm

I don't know how you can wish death on someone that you don't even know.

by Sponsored content