16 year old afghan from the jungle is shown to be really 22!!!

Tommy Monk wrote:

The Africans should be handed over to the African union to deal with and the middle easterns handed over to the Arab league to deal with...

magica wrote:No way can they send him to school like they proposed.

Since he lied to get in, he should, and others, be sent back to where he came from.

Why is there only men there, no women. These are not refugees either, they're from Africa and jumped on the bandwagon.

I bet Merkel regrets inviting them in now.

veya_victaous wrote:

Tommy Monk wrote:

The Africans should be handed over to the African union to deal with and the middle easterns handed over to the Arab league to deal with...

And Brition should be cleared out and given over to the natives of the new world
equally as fair
I have just as much right to call for it as you have to call for the dumb ass shit you do

veya_victaous wrote:

magica wrote:No way can they send him to school like they proposed.

Since he lied to get in, he should, and others, be sent back to where he came from.

Why is there only men there, no women. These are not refugees either, they're from Africa and jumped on the bandwagon.

I bet Merkel regrets inviting them in now.

women don't make it that far due to sex trafficing.
female refugees are often abducted and forced into the sex trade.
it literally takes a couple of minites of research to answer WHY THERE is so few women making it all the way to europe or australia.


So the headline is really
22year old seeks better life

magica wrote:No way can they send him to school like they proposed.

Since he lied to get in, he should, and others, be sent back to where he came from.

Why is there only men there, no women. These are not refugees either, they're from Africa and jumped on the bandwagon.

I bet Merkel regrets inviting them in now.

scrat wrote:

magica wrote:No way can they send him to school like they proposed.

Since he lied to get in, he should, and others, be sent back to where he came from.

Why is there only men there, no women. These are not refugees either, they're from Africa and jumped on the bandwagon.

I bet Merkel regrets inviting them in now.

Did I read somewhere that you wanted to be a counsellor and help people,,,,,,,,and yet you'd return them to this,,,,,



Perhaps running out of funds was a blessing disguise!

scrat wrote:

magica wrote:No way can they send him to school like they proposed.

Since he lied to get in, he should, and others, be sent back to where he came from.

Why is there only men there, no women. These are not refugees either, they're from Africa and jumped on the bandwagon.

I bet Merkel regrets inviting them in now.

Did I read somewhere that you wanted to be a counsellor and help people,,,,,,,,and yet you'd return them to this,,,,,



Perhaps running out of funds was a blessing disguise!

Syl wrote:

scrat wrote:
Did I read somewhere that you wanted to be a counsellor and help people,,,,,,,,and yet you'd return them to this,,,,,



Perhaps running out of funds was a blessing disguise!

England after the blitz....remind you of anything?
Incidentally the men of this country left to fight for a better life, not to run away for a better life.

magica wrote:

scrat wrote:
Did I read somewhere that you wanted to be a counsellor and help people,,,,,,,,and yet you'd return them to this,,,,,



Perhaps running out of funds was a blessing disguise!

They're not going to that, these are Africans not Syrians. What's that got do with counselling

scrat wrote:

magica wrote:



They're not going to that, these are Africans not Syrians. What's that got do with counselling

Thats a picture of Kabul, Afghanistan were the young man comes from and where you're determined to send him back to, perhaps you should of read the link before ranting RW bile, and perhaps compassion is no longer a requirement for counselling people who you wished to help.

scrat wrote:

Syl wrote:

England after the blitz....remind you of anything?
Incidentally the men of this country left to fight for a better life, not to run away for a better life.

Yeah, they came back to Blighty after fighting the RW Nazi filth that hated other races, Britain changed and Labour won a landslide victory because no one wanted to live in a world run by the intolerance of the far right.

They fought bravely for freedom, and would look down on the intolerance by some today and shudder!

Many of these young people have been through hell, often hell delivered by our arms manufacturers and our so called allies, showing some compassion for these lost souls should be the British way, but no the herd get deflected by far right hatred!

Syl wrote:

scrat wrote:
Thats a picture of Kabul, Afghanistan were the young man comes from and where you're determined to send him back to, perhaps you should of read the link before ranting RW bile, and perhaps compassion is no longer a requirement for counselling people who you wished to help.

Britain pledged to take in a certain number of children under 16. Those were the unaccompanied and orphaned kids who have been devastated by war or abandoned.
When someone in their 20's even 30's masquerades as a child.....and the authorities here are too pathetic to challenge that, do you understand that they are stealing the place that should have been to help a child?

scrat wrote:

Syl wrote:

Britain pledged to take in a certain number of children under 16. Those were the unaccompanied and orphaned kids who have been devastated by war or abandoned.
When someone in their 20's even 30's masquerades as a child.....and the authorities here are too pathetic to challenge that, do you understand that they are stealing the place that should have been to help a child?

Rubbish, just more RW blether, we've been bombing these children and young people for years, we've destroyed their lives, our greedy corporations have exploited them and made a fortune out of misery and the sale of arms, stop bombing them and they won't come here!

We're British we must lead the way in a civilised manner, setting the standard for everyone else to follow, not listen to the far right ranting of racist ne'er do wells, looking for an excuse to show intolerance at every turn.

scrat wrote:

magica wrote:



They're not going to that, these are Africans not Syrians. What's that got do with counselling

Thats a picture of Kabul, Afghanistan were the young man comes from and where you're determined to send him back to, perhaps you should of read the link before ranting RW bile, and perhaps compassion is no longer a requirement for counselling people who you wished to help.

Syl wrote:

scrat wrote:
Rubbish, just more RW blether, we've been bombing these children and young people for years, we've destroyed their lives, our greedy corporations have exploited them and made a fortune out of misery and the sale of arms, stop bombing them and they won't come here!

We're British we must lead the way in a civilised manner, setting the standard for everyone else to follow, not listen to the far right ranting of racist ne'er do wells, looking for an excuse to show intolerance at every turn.

So are you denying that this man and others like him have taken the place of a child in order to get here?

scrat wrote:

Syl wrote:

So are you denying that this man and others like him have taken the place of a child in order to get here?

Dont be so ridiculous there were less than 300 children, we let in 300,000 economic migrants last year to keep British workers wages down, there's no comparison.

This young man lost his brother, show some compassion and stop being so mean spirited "His brother was shot dead on the border of Iran. We were told he had been killed by one of the people smugglers".

Syl wrote:

scrat wrote:
Yeah, they came back to Blighty after fighting the RW Nazi filth that hated other races, Britain changed and Labour won a landslide victory because no one wanted to live in a world run by the intolerance of the far right.

They fought bravely for freedom, and would look down on the intolerance by some today and shudder!

Many of these young people have been through hell, often hell delivered by our arms manufacturers and our so called allies, showing some compassion for these lost souls should be the British way, but no the herd get deflected by far right hatred!

The point is war in whichever form it takes is horrible. People either fight or run......in the first 2 WW we fought, and the devastation we suffered is not unlike the pic you posted.
Had our men run away we would not be in the position to help....which we do, but there has to be limits.

magica wrote:

veya_victaous wrote:

magica wrote:No way can they send him to school like they proposed.

Since he lied to get in, he should, and others, be sent back to where he came from.

Why is there only men there, no women. These are not refugees either, they're from Africa and jumped on the bandwagon.

I bet Merkel regrets inviting them in now.

women don't make it that far due to sex trafficing.
female refugees are often abducted and forced into the sex trade.
it literally takes a couple of minites of research to answer WHY THERE is so few women making it all the way to europe or australia.


So the headline is really
22year old seeks better life

Funny how Oz wont take them in for a better life.

Spindleshanks wrote:

Syl wrote:

The point is war in whichever form it takes is horrible. People either fight or run......in the first 2 WW we fought, and the devastation we suffered is not unlike the pic you posted.
Had our men run away we would not be in the position to help....which we do, but there has to be limits.

Our men had little choice, particularly in the second world war.  Conscription was introduced the day after war was declared.

Syl wrote:

Spindleshanks wrote:

Syl wrote:

The point is war in whichever form it takes is horrible. People either fight or run......in the first 2 WW we fought, and the devastation we suffered is not unlike the pic you posted.
Had our men run away we would not be in the position to help....which we do, but there has to be limits.

Our men had little choice, particularly in the second world war.  Conscription was introduced the day after war was declared.

And thousands as young as 14 joined up voluntarily lying about their age.

veya_victaous wrote:

Syl wrote:

And thousands as young as 14 joined up voluntarily lying about their age.

Yeah this comparision is Bullshit too
Cause the Americans, Australians, Canadains, New Zealanders, Indians etc that Came to save your ass DID NOT do so by bombing Your cities
WHICH is how we decided to 'HELP' the people of Afghanistan.
 

nicko wrote:Veya is just a child who knows nothing about the World outside of his hut.

He hates the British because some Pom shagged his girl friend.

His hate and his racist bigoted posts are getting worse

His friend Ben lets him get away with posts that a British poster would get banned for,   Ben is frightened of him !!

nicko wrote:Veya is just a child who knows nothing about the World outside of his hut.

He hates the British because some Pom shagged his girl friend.

His hate and his racist bigoted posts are getting worse

His friend Ben lets him get away with posts that a British poster would get banned for,   Ben is frightened of him !!

Syl wrote:

Spindleshanks wrote:

Our men had little choice, particularly in the second world war.  Conscription was introduced the day after war was declared.

And in both wars thousands as young as 14 joined up voluntarily lying about their age.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/guides/zcvdhyc

"At the outbreak of war in 1914, the British Army had 700,000 available men. Germany’s wartime army was over 3.7 million. When a campaign for volunteers was launched, thousands answered the call to fight. Among them were 250,000 boys and young men under the age of 19, the legal limit for armed service overseas"

Tommy Monk wrote:

An official remembers him enrolling I'm kabul university 3 years ago and an online dating profile shows him as 22 too!!!


https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/2078483/22-year-old-bearded-migrant-uni-student-insists-hes-just-sixteen-as-he-starts-secondary-school-classes/

Syl wrote:

veya_victaous wrote:

Syl wrote:

And thousands as young as 14 joined up voluntarily lying about their age.

Yeah this comparision is Bullshit too
Cause the Americans, Australians, Canadains, New Zealanders, Indians etc that Came to save your ass DID NOT do so by bombing Your cities
WHICH is how we decided to 'HELP' the people of Afghanistan.
 

Almost every post you made reads like drunken bullshit.

"More than one million British military personnel died during the First and Second World Wars, with the First World War alone accounting for 886,000 fatalities. Nearly 70,000 British civilians also lost their lives, the great majority during the Second World War."


Those one million didn't die trying to run.....they died fighting the enemy.

nicko wrote:Veya is just a child who knows nothing about the World outside of his hut.

He hates the British because some Pom shagged his girl friend.

His hate and his racist bigoted posts are getting worse

His friend Ben lets him get away with posts that a British poster would get banned for,   Ben is frightened of him !!

Spindleshanks wrote:

Syl wrote:

And in both wars thousands as young as 14 joined up voluntarily lying about their age.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/guides/zcvdhyc

"At the outbreak of war in 1914, the British Army had 700,000 available men. Germany’s wartime army was over 3.7 million. When a campaign for volunteers was launched, thousands answered the call to fight. Among them were 250,000 boys and young men under the age of 19, the legal limit for armed service overseas"

Which would be why they had to introduce conscription in 1916?

1914-1915:

These were the years of the Volunteer Army
In August 1914 the British Government called for an extra 100,000 volunteer soldiers to come forward.
They got 750,000 men by the end of September, and by January 1915 more than 1 million had joined the armed forces voluntarily.
By Mid 1915 volunteer numbers were falling fast and the National Registration Act was created. It was a list of all the men fit for military service who were still available.

http://ww1facts.net/people/conscription/

It appears that once people began to know what lay in store for them they quickly began backing off.

veya_victaous wrote:

magica wrote:


Funny how Oz wont take them in for a better life.

we will if they don't come by boat a stupid policy i disagree with

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-09-21/where-does-australia-rank-on-its-refugee-intake/7864070

we rank 3rd that resettled the most refugees through the UNHCR

although lower in the other measures we are still out ranking the UK. and considering we are more isolated and on the other side of the planet to the current conflicts (our numbers were much higher when issues were in South east Asia)

Your Statement IS COMPLETE BULLSHIT
what is it with Brits and spouting Bullshit

veya_victaous wrote:

Syl wrote:

Almost every post you made reads like drunken bullshit.

"More than one million British military personnel died during the First and Second World Wars, with the First World War alone accounting for 886,000 fatalities. Nearly 70,000 British civilians also lost their lives, the great majority during the Second World War."


Those one million didn't die trying to run.....they died fighting the enemy.

with Plenty of allies that HELPED not Bombed them !!!
AND Plenty of Brits WERE relocated to your allies lands too
So IF Brits want to compare then YES you should take them from Afghanistan As your allies did.
Because IT IS NOT COMPARABLE and ANYONE TRYING to
is doing so cause they are Racist Trying to make themselves fell better about being Fuckign arseholes to people they regard as Foriegn

veya_victaous wrote:

Syl wrote:

Almost every post you made reads like drunken bullshit.

"More than one million British military personnel died during the First and Second World Wars, with the First World War alone accounting for 886,000 fatalities. Nearly 70,000 British civilians also lost their lives, the great majority during the Second World War."


Those one million didn't die trying to run.....they died fighting the enemy.

with Plenty of allies that HELPED not Bombed them !!!
AND Plenty of Brits WERE relocated to your allies lands too
So IF Brits want to compare then YES you should take them from Afghanistan As your allies did.
Because IT IS NOT COMPARABLE and ANYONE TRYING to
is doing so cause they are Racist Trying to make themselves fell better about being Fuckign arseholes to people they regard as Foriegn

Syl wrote:

Spindleshanks wrote:

Which would be why they had to introduce conscription in 1916?

1914-1915:

These were the years of the Volunteer Army
In August 1914 the British Government called for an extra 100,000 volunteer soldiers to come forward.
They got 750,000 men by the end of September, and by January 1915 more than 1 million had joined the armed forces voluntarily.
By Mid 1915 volunteer numbers were falling fast and the National Registration Act was created. It was a list of all the men fit for military service who were still available.

http://ww1facts.net/people/conscription/

It appears that once people began to know what lay in store for them they quickly began backing off.

We were just one of many countries who introduced conscription. We introduced it again in 1939 in order to raise numbers to fight in WW2. Some countries had never relaxed it.

Spindleshanks wrote:

Syl wrote:

We were just one of many countries who introduced conscription. We introduced it again in 1939 in order to raise numbers to fight in WW2. Some countries had never relaxed it.

Why would a country need to introduce conscription if men were happy to become canon fodder?

They needed to do it because after a year and given the choice most of them were choosing not to enlist.  Quite clearly with conscription beginning at the very beginning of the second world war, the government weren't willing to take the risk that men would decide war was not for them so they took the choice away from them.

Tommy Monk wrote:

Tommy Monk wrote:

An official remembers him enrolling I'm kabul university 3 years ago and an online dating profile shows him as 22 too!!!


https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/2078483/22-year-old-bearded-migrant-uni-student-insists-hes-just-sixteen-as-he-starts-secondary-school-classes/

Thread reminder.


The diversion tactics have been out in force I see...

veya_victaous wrote:

nicko wrote:Veya is just a child who knows nothing about the World outside of his hut.

He hates the British because some Pom shagged his girl friend.

His hate and his racist bigoted posts are getting worse

His friend Ben lets him get away with posts that a British poster would get banned for,   Ben is frightened of him !!

Nicko Just go back to Fap you wanker

I never had a Birtish Girl Friend
And a pansy arse Brit would not steal shit

Not rants just stating Facts
You lot just want to post British Propganda unchallaged Go to Fap
FUCK OFF AND DON'T POST HERE

It's not the Ben is scared of me WHY would be be? he is not a cowardly Brit fucking scared of Immigrnats and eveything else
It is that YOU GREATLY OVER ESTIMATE YOUR WORTH.

AND FOR THE RECORD
YOU ARE SO FUCKING PROTECTED
EVIDENSE YOU ARE STILL HERE

Syl wrote:

Spindleshanks wrote:

Why would a country need to introduce conscription if men were happy to become canon fodder?

They needed to do it because after a year and given the choice most of them were choosing not to enlist.  Quite clearly with conscription beginning at the very beginning of the second world war, the government weren't willing to take the risk that men would decide war was not for them so they took the choice away from them.

As did many other countries.

That still doesn't detract from my original point that thousands of underage males enlisted by lying about their age.

eddie wrote:BIG DERAIL COMING UP!

Can everyone just stop with the "this poster is proetected" and "this mod hates this person".

It's boring, it's pathetic and we've all been down this road one too many times.

How about simply answering the post you're quoting instead of shouting about how big your land is and how many metric length of cock you have?
How about it?

Spindleshanks wrote:

Syl wrote:

Spindleshanks wrote:

Why would a country need to introduce conscription if men were happy to become canon fodder?

They needed to do it because after a year and given the choice most of them were choosing not to enlist.  Quite clearly with conscription beginning at the very beginning of the second world war, the government weren't willing to take the risk that men would decide war was not for them so they took the choice away from them.

As did many other countries.

That still doesn't detract from my original point that thousands of underage males enlisted by lying about their age.

It seems you aren't getting the point Syl.  

You think the male refugees should stay and fight suggesting its what British men did voluntarily while ignoring the fact that for the most part they actually had little choice in the matter.  Arrest, imprisonment or even execution awaited those who defied conscription or who went awol.

Underage kids fighting wars is a side issue, unless you think the Syrian government should be forcing 14 year olds to fight?

veya_victaous wrote:

Tommy Monk wrote:

The Africans should be handed over to the African union to deal with and the middle easterns handed over to the Arab league to deal with...

And Brition should be cleared out and given over to the natives of the new world
equally as fair
I have just as much right to call for it as you have to call for the dumb ass shit you do

Spindleshanks wrote:Interestingly though, those young boys must have looked way older than their years to be accepted, which tends to show that what someone looks like is not always a good indicator of how old they actually are