the reality for homeless women in Britain....

Cuchulain wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

Of course British homeless people should take priority.

Why?
When you can help both?
You see its not really homeless that sways your decision, but something invented, called British.

Shady wrote:

sassy wrote:

When you talk about people running away you show your complete ignorance of the situation.  There are two sides terrorising these people, Assad and ISIS.  If they fight for Assad they will end up having to kill their own people, maybe even their own families.  If they fight for ISIS the same is true.  There is no side they can join to fight for those they don't want to kill people.  You're a prick Tommy, a first class, unadultered, 100% prick, with the knowledge of a cucumber.  I absolutely and sincerely hope that one day you get put in the same position, I really do.

Well Sassy my girl,that's not strictly true.

Now I don't expect you to know these things in the safety of the UK but there are many groups in Syria fighting against both ISIS & Assad.And those Syrian refugees,& I use the term lightly,have been in receipt of regular offers from the various groups to fight primarily ISIS.

But they turn the offers down for various reasons.However, the opportunities are there for them in abundance.

And that's no ifs or buts.But they would sooner leave their country rather than fight for it.

Raggamuffin wrote:

Cuchulain wrote:

Why?
When you can help both?
You see its not really homeless that sways your decision, but something invented, called British.

What's wrong with being British? You make it sound like it's a bad thing.

Cuchulain wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

What's wrong with being British? You make it sound like it's a bad thing.

Where did I claim there was anything wrong with the concept British?

Never did.

Try again

Raggamuffin wrote:

Cuchulain wrote:


Where did I claim there was anything wrong with the concept British?

Never did.

Try again

You're very scornful about the concept of being British. Another anti-Brit ...

Raggamuffin wrote:It makes sense to deal with problems that are already here before taking on new problems, yes?

Cuchulain wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:It makes sense to deal with problems that are already here before taking on new problems, yes?

So you are saying any new problem should get just placed to one side then.
So if there was a new pandemic tomorrow, this should be placed to one side until we have resolved other problems like homelessness then?

Or work to resolve both?

Raggamuffin wrote:

Cuchulain wrote:

So you are saying any new problem should get just placed to one side then.
So if there was a new pandemic tomorrow, this should be placed to one side until we have resolved other problems like homelessness then?

Or work to resolve both?

I'm saying that British people in Britain should come first. Problem?

Cuchulain wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

I'm saying that British people in Britain should come first. Problem?

I am asking why, when the problem is homelessness which includes refugees?
What about EU citizens Homeless residing here?
Foreign born residing in the UK who may have worked for sometime here?

Tommy Monk wrote:Foreign nationals here under the pretense of working who are not working should be returned to their,country of origin.


EU nationals here not working and/or homeless should be returned to their home nations.


AFricans arriving in the EU should be returned to the African union and people arriving from the middle east should be returned to the Arab league to deal with.



Both African union add Arab league collectively control vast land areas with huge resources and money... they are their problem and should be sent back to them to deal with.