remember when gordon brown sold the gold(future`s)

First topic message reminder :

Gold Price Plunges Amid Asia Markets Sell-Off

After reaching a peak in the summer of 2011, gold falls to a five-year low as investors in Asia and the US face uncertain times.

A combination of rate hike fears in the US together with selling activity in China has caused the price of gold to fall to its lowest level in nearly six years.

Spot gold fell to as low as $1,083.74 (£695) in Asian trade - marking its lowest price since November 2009.

There was a significant move lower in Asian trading at about 2.25am BST - with gold losing over 4% of its value in just a few minutes as five tonnes of gold were sold through the Shanghai gold exchange in the opening half hour.

Gold, which is as seen as a safe haven in times of uncertainty, trades in the opposite direction to that of the US dollar. So when the dollar is rising in value the price of gold falls.

The main reason for the trend is that gold, like most other commodities, is priced in US dollars. When the US dollar strengthens, it will take fewer dollars to buy the same amount of gold.

As the threat of a rate hike in the US increases so does the value of the US dollar. Since the beginning of May the US dollar is 1.6% stronger against the pound and this is widely cited as the reason behind the recent trend we have seen in the falling price of gold.

Another reason behind the fall could be the near term resolution of the Greek crisis. Banks are set to reopen today after a third €86bn bailout package was agreed.

The fact that Greece will be able to repay its debts, at least in the short term, means that the risk premium attached to gold, as a safe haven, is diluted.

Another potential reason behind the sell-off could have been Friday's news from the People's Bank of China that it owns around 1,658 tonnes of gold bullion - far less than the circa 3,500 tonnes analysts had expected.

This was the first time China had revealed its gold holdings since 2009, and although it now owns 60% more gold than it did in 2009, the revelation that the country owns less than expected prompted a $10 per ounce price drop on Friday.

Sydney-listed gold miner Evolution mining saw its shares fall over 14% on the back of the drop in the price of gold this morning.

Since its peak in August 2011 gold has lost nearly 40% of its value. It is currently trading at around $1,109 per ounce.

There was no mention of any set number of questions!!!


And yet you said you finished the test, how did you finish the test if you didn't come to the end of the questions? IQ tests are timed, if you answer all the questions that is part of finding out your IQ, there are always a set number of questions.

Tommy Monk wrote:What the fuck are you talking about!!!???



There was no mention of any set number of questions!!!


The questions just kept on coming  until the time ran out!!!


The quicker the questions were answered meant more questions were given, and the more you answered and answered correctly meant the higher The score!!!


Seriously... what is wrong with you people!!!???


This was not like a normal exam where you had say 50 questions and  a given time limit to answer as many as you could in that time... the number of questions were not specified and from a seemingly endless supply!!!


The more I answered, the more that just kept coming until the time was up.

you said

quote:
And obviously if I hadn't stopped, i would have been answering questions still


why would you be answering more still if the time was up ? no consistency in your answers just mindless twisting ....poor Tommy

Good old Tommy. Makes Stephen Hawking seem like Benny from Crossroads.😂
I am in awe of being in the company of a poster with an IQ in 4 figures!

What is wrong with you people!!!???



For ten minutes of The hour I wasn't answering any questions as I've already said!!!


The test didn't stipulate how many questions that there was available in total!!!


it just kept firing questions at me, one page at a time and with only a few questions on each page.


Once answered all on the page showing, there was a button to go to the next page with next group of questions...


Then again once answered, click next page and more questions arrived...


I was ploughing through them as quick as I could, not knowing how many questions were going to be coming or how long for!


All the test said at The beginning was that it would run for a set time, although unspecified, and that You had to answer as many questios as you could, as quick as you could and get as many correct answers as you could until the end.



Fuck me!!!


I can't explain this any simpler!!!


Why are you unable to follow this simple concept!!!???



And you call me stupid!!!

Tommy, you said it was online, give us the link to the test.

Handy Andy wrote:Good old Tommy. Makes Stephen  Hawking  seem like Benny from Crossroads.😂
I am in awe of being in the company of a poster with an IQ in 4 figures!

i know i feel like i am kicking a puppy some times
oviously english wasn`t part of this "test " he didn`t complete .................or did ................he`s not really worked that out yet has he

It was three years ago sassy... of course I don't have the link...!


But feel free to have a search around for "free online IQ test" and look for the one that doesn't stipulate any number of questions and goes on for an hour!!!


And KD... if you were doing an hour long driving test... when would you have completed it...!!!???





You really are a thicko aren't you!!!

Oh gawd, I'm choking on me horlicks, amazing how you remember exactly what you did when you weren't doing it and how long it took you!!!!!!!!

Tommy, you are fucking priceless!

Tommy obviously hasnt aged well in those 3 years then

Honestly I can't stop giggling!

I have a good memory... comes with the IQ!!!

Tommy Monk wrote:It was three years ago sassy... of course I don't have the link...!


But feel free to have a search around for "free online IQ test" and look for the one that doesn't stipulate any number of questions and goes on for an hour!!!


And KD... if you were doing an hour long driving test... when would you have completed it...!!!???





You really are a thicko aren't you!!!

driving test  ? wtf but FYI i passed my test first time ...no breaks to make phone calls or pee or to  check google

you say you took an online test

you say you took a break 10-15 mins

you say after i pointed out IQ tests are timed "All the test said at The beginning was that it would run for a set time"


you said "obviously if I hadn't stopped, i would have been answering questions still ".............on a timed test ??


you claimed that ten min would have given you a better score than genius


Tommy Tommy Tommy Tommy  you have been rumbled you tried to big your self up as a genius and done nothing but prove the exact opposite
with endless twisting and inane explanations that do nothing more that dig a bigger hole priceless.... you want a ladder ?

korban dallas wrote:

Tommy Monk wrote:It was three years ago sassy... of course I don't have the link...!


But feel free to have a search around for "free online IQ test" and look for the one that doesn't stipulate any number of questions and goes on for an hour!!!


And KD... if you were doing an hour long driving test... when would you have completed it...!!!???





You really are a thicko aren't you!!!

driving test  ? wtf but FYI i passed my test first time ...no breaks to make phone calls or pee or to  check google

you say you took an online test

you say you took a break 10-15 mins

you say after i pointed out IQ tests are timed "All the test said at The beginning was that it would run for a set time"


you said "obviously if I hadn't stopped, i would have been answering questions still ".............on a timed test ??


you claimed that ten min would have given you a better score than genius


Tommy Tommy Tommy Tommy  you have been rumbled you tried to big your self up as a genius and done nothing but prove the exact opposite
with endless twisting and inane explanations that do nothing more that dig a bigger hole priceless.... you want a ladder ?

is there one long enough?

Thick
Obtuse
Moronic
Mad
Yokel

well i feel the general consensus is toomy has fail to prove his genius status as claimed

and i am happy to go with that

korban dallas wrote:

Tommy Monk wrote:It was three years ago sassy... of course I don't have the link...!


But feel free to have a search around for "free online IQ test" and look for the one that doesn't stipulate any number of questions and goes on for an hour!!!


And KD... if you were doing an hour long driving test... when would you have completed it...!!!???





You really are a thicko aren't you!!!

driving test  ? wtf but FYI i passed my test first time ...no breaks to make phone calls or pee or to  check google

My point was that an hour long test would be completed after an hour of time had elapsed...

you say you took an online test

I took an online test, yes...

you say you took a break 10-15 mins

I left the test running while I made a tea, had a piss and made two quick phone calls, yes... no more than ten minutes...

you say after i pointed out IQ tests are timed "All the test said at The beginning was that it would run for a set time"

I have said all along that this test had said it was timed and it went on for about an hour...

you said "obviously if I hadn't stopped, i would have been answering questions still ".............on a timed test ??

During the ten minutes I left the test to make the tea, have a piss and make the phone calls, I was not answering questions... obviously I would have been answering questions if I had been doing the test for those ten minutes instead of making tea, having a piss and phone calls... so out of The hour given to answer questions, ten minutes of that was not spent answering questions... if I hadn't have stopped answering questions for those ten minutes then I would have been answering questions for those ten minutes!

you claimed that ten min would have given you a better score than genius

If I had been answering questions for the whole hour then I would of course answered more questions and got higher score...


Tommy Tommy Tommy Tommy  you have been rumbled you tried to big your self up as a genius and done nothing but prove the exact opposite
with endless twisting and inane explanations that do nothing more that dig a bigger hole priceless.... you want a ladder ?

Please stop being a twat!!!

It really is quite simple if you listen to what I say and stop making bits up yourself!!!

Tommy Monk wrote:

korban dallas wrote:
driving test  ? wtf but FYI i passed my test first time ...no breaks to make phone calls or pee or to  check google

My point was that an hour long test would be completed after an hour of time had elapsed...  

you say you took an online test

I took an online test, yes...

you say you took a break 10-15 mins

I left the test running while I made a tea, had a piss and made two quick phone calls, yes... no more than ten minutes...

you say after i pointed out IQ tests are timed "All the test said at The beginning was that it would run for a set time"

I have said all along that this test had said it was timed and it went on for about an hour...

you said "obviously if I hadn't stopped, i would have been answering questions still ".............on a timed test ??

During the ten minutes I left the test to make the tea, have a piss and make the phone calls, I was not answering questions... obviously I would have been answering questions if I had been doing the test for those ten minutes instead of making tea, having a piss and phone calls... so out of The hour given to answer questions, ten minutes of that was not spent answering questions... if I hadn't have stopped answering questions for those ten minutes then I would have been answering questions for those ten minutes!

you claimed that ten min would have given you a better score than genius

If I had been answering questions for the whole hour then I would of course answered more questions and got higher score...


Tommy Tommy Tommy Tommy  you have been rumbled you tried to big your self up as a genius and done nothing but prove the exact opposite
with endless twisting and inane explanations that do nothing more that dig a bigger hole priceless.... you want a ladder ?

Please stop being a twat!!!

It really is quite simple if you listen to what I say and stop making bits up yourself!!!

listen ?

I think you mean read and i haven`t made anything up Tommy i quoted your words not mine

And i will stop being a "twat" as you call it The day you do

Yeah... ok KD... like when you quoted victors words that he had edited onto one of my posts in a reply, and you stupidly thought were MY words!!!


You have mugged yourself off good and proper on this thread as anyone can see by reading through it!!!

Funny how you remember what you were doing, why you did it, how long it took, the fact it had endless questions, even your score- but don't remember the website.

Don't be a twat les... why would I remember a random web site that I used once over three years ago?


You'll be telling me I should remember a phone number I dialed once next!!!

Tommy Monk wrote:

korban dallas wrote:
driving test  ? wtf but FYI i passed my test first time ...no breaks to make phone calls or pee or to  check google

My point was that an hour long test would be completed after an hour of time had elapsed...  

you said you  thought it would only take 10-20 minutes and now you say it was a hour long test a driving test is a hour long you know that at the time of taking it  


you say you took an online test

I took an online test, yes...
not in dispute just your score is in dispute


I left the test running while I made a tea, had a piss and made two quick phone calls, yes... no more than ten minutes...

you say after i pointed out IQ tests are timed "All the test said at The beginning was that it would run for a set time"

And you say below "The hour given to answer" so why did you think it was going to last 15-20 mins if a hour was given

I have said all along that this test had said it was timed and it went on for about an hour...

you said "obviously if I hadn't stopped, i would have been answering questions still ".............on a timed test ??

During the ten minutes I left the test to make the tea, have a piss and make the phone calls, I was not answering questions... obviously I would have been answering questions if I had been doing the test for those ten minutes instead of making tea, having a piss and phone calls... so out of The hour given to answer questions, ten minutes of that was not spent answering questions... if I hadn't have stopped answering questions for those ten minutes then I would have been answering questions for those ten minutes!

totally fuzzy logic and not what you later said "still answering questions"  

still
At the present time

you claimed that ten min would have given you a better score than genius

If I had been answering questions for the whole hour then I would of course answered more questions and got higher score...


Tommy Tommy Tommy Tommy  you have been rumbled you tried to big your self up as a genius and done nothing but prove the exact opposite
with endless twisting and inane explanations that do nothing more that dig a bigger hole priceless.... you want a ladder ?



Please stop being a twat!!!

It really is quite simple if you listen to what I say and stop making bits up yourself!!!

your the one adding bits Tommy not me and when you refer back to what you actually said it doesn`t hold water

Tommy Monk wrote:Yeah... ok KD... like when you quoted victors words that he had edited onto one of my posts in a reply, and you stupidly thought were MY words!!!


You have mugged yourself off good and proper on this thread as anyone can see by reading through it!!!

that false claim already dealt with i thought you had a good memory ? remember this under the bit i commented on that you then claimed "i was joking" i never referenced any other comment did i thats just you trying to deflect from my actual highlighted comment

Tommy Monk wrote:Yeah... ok KD... like when you quoted victors words that he had edited onto one of my posts in a reply, and you stupidly thought were MY words!!!


You have mugged yourself off good and proper on this thread as anyone can see by reading through it!!!

hahaha yes i highlighted victors comment as i have said constantly and you answered that by claiming it was a joke .........and have spent two pages trying to claim other wise

anyone can see by reading through it!!!

and so far its all been confirmation of my interpretation



funny that

the only person to have mugged themselfs off good and proper is you

your original
comment was this and what we are taliking about

Well I scored 140 on an IQ test with no practicing before hand, and that was even after taking a ten minute break during it to make a cup of tea, have a piss And make a couple of phone calls!!!

all the rest was add ins by you and a later date to try and twist your way out of you stupid claim bragging

i also pointed out this


IQ tests are misleading because they do not accurately reflect intelligence, according to a study which found that a minimum of three different exams are needed to measure someone's brainpower.

IQ is a massive oversimplification of the spectrum of human cognitive ability.”

so all in all you fail tommy even with your truly impressive twisting and additions

on line test honestly hang your head in shame pall using that to claim a indication intelligence

any way time to kill some Germans its been ....dare i say fun yes why not

My story has remained consistent all through... it is just you Are too stupid to follow it.

And I was not claiming victors bit were MY words and I never claimed I was joking... What I was asking was whether you were deliberately misrepresenting my words for a joke!!!

You have got just about everything wrong on this thread and misunderstood almost every part of what is a simple And straigt forward story!!!

And have tied yourself up in knots in The process!!!

Prize tit!!!

Tommy Monk wrote:Very honest of You victor!


And les, I don't think you shouldn't be allowed to marry, I think you should have as much right to marry a woman as every other man!


If a child was deliberately denied a mother who for the most part is more needed then that would be more than unfortunate.


I believe your attraction to another man and sexual practices are indeed abnormal and unnatural... this is just a statement of fact.

So are you claiming that as your reasoning to deny homosexuals equal rights?

Something so different, abnormal and unnatural cannot be classed as the same and therefore not "equal".

Tommy Monk wrote:Something so different, abnormal and unnatural cannot be classed as the same and therefore not "equal".

So using your reasoning above why not deny people equal rights, who kisss, have oral or anal sex? I could actually add many variables here to your methodology of something so different, abnormal and unnatural. The fact is that is not your reason at all, because if it was then you would back and call for all in  these groups to be denied equal rights. Its an excuse you use because of an aversion you have that has made you hate homosexuality. Its emotions driving your reasoning here because as seen above your reasoning falls apart because you do not claim peoiple who have oral sex should be denied the same rights as you.

So cut with the bullshit and for one just admit you have no reason other than a hate you have formed from an aversion you have to homosexuals.

your post said


Tommy Monk wrote:
Well I scored 140 on an IQ test with no practicing before hand, and that was even after taking a ten minute break during it to make a cup of tea, have a piss And make a couple of phone calls!!!
I'm a fucking genius!!!


And I'm not even joking!!!

-----------------------------------------------------------------
victor in his reply added "google the answers"

i said in reply to your original not edited post

So what are you saying ....your a idiot savant ?

you then did a lot of complain about being called stupid and lefties throwing  derogatory insults. yet you call people stupid and make derogatory insults all the time Do hypocrisy much Tommy


i then replied again to the same post i had already replied to with victors edit actually pointing   to only one bit
of the post victors edit

Tommy Monk wrote:
Well I scored 140 on an IQ test with no practicing before hand, and that was even after taking a ten minute break during it to make a cup of tea, have a piss And make a couple of phone calls!!! google the answers
......................................................................................


you said in response to that post

The truth is clearly written in my posts... but you still manage to cherry pick small parts of this truth, and then twist it into lies!!!

The bit i "cherry picked" as you rightly pointed out and I had  highlighted with :::cawg:::::was "google the answers"


you continued

Is this a deliberate misrepresentation of what I actually said for a joke..?

it should have been is this a deliberate misrepresentation of what Victor  said for a joke..?


so what part was the joke ? in that post you say i misrepresented  "The truth is clearly written in my posts." was that the joke
Or was it "cherry pick small parts of this truth" was that the joke ?

or was it "I had to stop and make the calls because it was getting near to 5-00pm" was that the joke ?

you made no mention that it was victors edit in fact said "you"(meaning me)  still manage to cherry pick


you went on

Is this a deliberate misrepresentation of what I actually said for a joke..?

And that`s the point Tommy  you said "I"  when you should have said "victor said for a joke"

so no misrepresentation  you did say "I said as a joke" yet what part of the post i commented on was a joke as i asked above .and still no mention of victors edit

in fact you then said

Just like your selective 'quotes' of my posts again no mention of victors edit [
you should have said ust like your selective 'quotes' of b] what Victor said [/b]but again no mention of victors edit
you then made drugs and alcohol jibes at me and made as usual derogatory insults to Les that you complain about us "lefty`s making to you

that`s that hypocrisy again

it wasn`t till 5 of your posts later you finally made the obvious point and said "and it was victors Piss take post"

guess a light finally dawned did it
after your "i" and "my" comments

you then said "
Even after I told him exactly where he had gone wrong!!!" yes 5 posts later as i said after the "i" and "my" comments


i admonished victor for spoiling it for me and pointed out exactly your mistake




The truth is clearly written in my posts... but you still manage to cherry pick small parts of this truth, and then twist it into lies!!!

as tommy does all the time............................................................................... the Freudian slip pretty much confirms he did as you suspected jokingly google answers
Is this a deliberate misrepresentation of what I actually said for a joke..?

        As tommy does ........................................What he said as a joke ? yet it was what you said
                                                                                    wasn`t it victor not toomy


See you do that a lot "cherry pick" the bits you want to believe regardless of any evidence a classic example is about gay parents being bad not nice or black on white crime not nice  when its done to you

yet all you had to do was say after my post with the  was say i meant "what victor said as a joke or "cherry pick what victor said as a joke" but you claimed the statement as your own with "i" and "my" till you realised you did not say that
As i later said was probably a Freudian slip "and that you did cheat after all "

then they was the" thought was what you would be a 15-20 mins test that became a hour timed test and the the break that became i went back to finish that then became if you hadn`t stopped you would still be answering them  
and more bragging that for 10 mins you would have had a higher then near genius score and you just kept  


quick tip when somebody says "i`m not bragging BUT"  it means they are bragging everybody knows that Tommy it like saying i am not a racist BUT

BUT is a clause

Bob didn't mean to do it, but he did it anyway.

now i have explained fully where you went wrong in the first place seems a fundamental error of somebody with you alleged IQ
me i am normal i guess never had a IQ test had lots of other though
but as everybody has pointed out a on-line IQ  test is nothing to Bragg about and try to big your self up as you did
it does`t impress anybody as i think most have pointed out and is a indication of nothing other than an deep insecurity that is also manifest in you fear of homosexuals and black people as witnessed on hear daily and in almost every topic

i hope this helps

Again you Are missing the point that I was commenting on the other bit of MY post you mis-quoted... I was asking if you were deliberately misrepresenting what I said... as some sort of joke!!!


Not saying that I had said anything for a koke you doughnut!!!


And I also would not be saying other peoples word were MY words either you twat!!!


It IS completely your misunderstanding of these simple things that has made you run off in a totally different direction and totally misreading the message and the context!!!


And you're still doing it!!!


This Is why I think there is something wrong with the way your mind works... you make irrational leaps of reasoning based on your inability of understanding what is really being said!!!


Then you get frustrated in your argument when you Are having things pointed out to You that You Are too stubborn and arrogant to accept!!!


Have a look at some IQ questions and see how impossible it would be to look up answers for picture diagrams, shapes and the 3D cube laid out flat questions...


And stop making a tit of yourself with your inability to understand simple premises!!!

Cuchulain wrote:

Tommy Monk wrote:Something so different, abnormal and unnatural cannot be classed as the same and therefore not "equal".

So using your reasoning above why not deny people equal rights, who kisss, have oral or anal sex? I could actually add many variables here to your methodology of something so different, abnormal and unnatural. The fact is that is not your reason at all, because if it was then you would back and call for all in  these groups to be denied equal rights. Its an excuse you use because of an aversion you have that has made you hate homosexuality. Its emotions driving your reasoning here because as seen above your reasoning falls apart because you do not claim peoiple who have oral sex should be denied the same rights as you.

So cut with the bullshit and for one just admit you have no reason other than a hate you have formed from an aversion you have to homosexuals.

Male and female coupling is the normal and natural way.

I don't hate people for being homosexual, I pity them, And hope that they one day see the error of their ways...

Tommy Monk wrote:Again you Are missing the point that I was commenting on the other bit of MY post you mis-quoted... I was asking if you were deliberately misrepresenting what I said... as some sort of joke!!!


Not saying that I had said anything for a koke you doughnut!!!


And I also would not be saying other peoples word were MY words division you twat!!!


It IS completely your misunderstanding of these simple things that has made you run off in a totally different direction and totally misreading the message and the context!!!


And you're still doing it!!!


This Is why I think there is something wrong with the way your mind works... you make irrational leaps of reasoning based on your inability of understanding what is really being said!!!


Then you get frustrated in your argument when you Are having things pointed out to You that You Are too stubborn and arrogant to accept!!!


Have a look at some IQ questions and see how impossible it would be to look up answers for picture diagrams, shapes and the 3D cube laid out flat questions...


And stop making a tit of yourself with your inability to understand simple premises!!!

yes tommy we know you never admit a mistake although i have when i have said something to you i misunderstood guess that makes me the bigger man and more honest than you will ever be

i have pointed out your mistake at length. and i think you i think your in a minority of one on this as to who`s the tit and lacking in honesty

i am happy to leave this for others to judge now
as trying to get any thing trough to you is like trying to hammer butter in to granite

Premise is an assumption that something is true. In logic, an argument requires a set of (at least) two declarative sentences (or "propositions") known as the premises or premisses along with another declarative sentence

you confused the declarative bit and used "i" and "my" rather than "victor" as victor was the declarative bit

your proposition was "are you deliberately. "victor was the declarative bit
but your declarative bit was "I" and "my"


140 my ass

Tommy Monk wrote:

Cuchulain wrote:


So using your reasoning above why not deny people equal rights, who kisss, have oral or anal sex? I could actually add many variables here to your methodology of something so different, abnormal and unnatural. The fact is that is not your reason at all, because if it was then you would back and call for all in  these groups to be denied equal rights. Its an excuse you use because of an aversion you have that has made you hate homosexuality. Its emotions driving your reasoning here because as seen above your reasoning falls apart because you do not claim peoiple who have oral sex should be denied the same rights as you.

So cut with the bullshit and for one just admit you have no reason other than a hate you have formed from an aversion you have to homosexuals.

Male and female coupling is the normal and natural way.

I don't hate people for being homosexual, I pity them, And hope that they one day see the error of their ways...

I should think not, how silly it is to hate people because of a relationship they choose to be in. Love and commitment can only be a good thing, as long as they are not hurting anyone.

Listen you twat, I was not referring to the bit that victor added to my post!!!


So you whole load of subsequent thinking is wrong!!!


I can't make it any simpler than that!!!

Tommy Monk wrote:Listen you twat, I was not referring to the bit that victor added to my post!!!


So you whole load of subsequent thinking is wrong!!!


I can't make it any simpler than that!!!

you seem to be very angry guess that`s because you know you fucked up  i tried to make it simple for you your the twat pal

and everybody can see that


bye mr not so 140 genius after all
what a prick you are

I know you're a bit slow on the uptake but this is getting ridiculous now!!!



I was not replying to the bit you think!!!


I was replying to the bit above where you questioned the hour time of test with a selective quote of MY earlier post saying "15 minutes went past...(etc)" when I actually said "ANOTHER 15 minutes went past..." and that was taken out of The rest of The post which went into detail about all the rest of The hour time I was doing the test!!!


What is wrong with you!!!???

Tommy Monk wrote:I know you're a bit slow on the uptake but this is getting ridiculous now!!!



I was not replying to the bit you think!!!


I was replying to the bit above where you questioned the hour time of test with a selective quote of MY earlier post saying "15 minutes went past...(etc)" when I actually said "ANOTHER 15 minutes went past..." and that was taken out of The rest of The post which went into detail about all the rest of The hour time I was doing the test!!!

!!!???

wow desperate or what 3 pages of me referring to the google bit i highlighted and and him trying to twist

And all of a sudden out the blue he changes his premise and brings up something he did  not even mentioned in 3 pages
Houston we are going to need a bigger hole





your so funny your like the gift that keeps on giving

the better question is
What is wrong with you!!!???

go on say some thing else mr 140

Tom would be at home on the Flop forum.Perhaps Dean should invite him there- it would raise the average IQ into double figures,especially as Tom's is so high.
He will feel at home amongst thick,racist, homophobic far right wingers

Handy Andy wrote:Tom would be at home on the Flop forum.Perhaps Dean should invite  him there- it would  raise the average IQ into double figures,especially  as Tom's  is so high.
He will feel at home amongst thick,racist, homophobic far right wingers

they are a few thing even i would not wish on dean Andy
and to be honest deno would rip him to bits i suspect

Of course, he could already be there.
Tom Sawyer has identical  beliefs.
Or even worse,TM  could be our old mucker Hugh Jardon.,who Dean banned for criminal hacking and allegedly  has recently  served at her majesty's  pleasure for fraud.
He too had a  phenomenal  IQ,had a huge mansion and drove several Beamers.

Tommy Monk wrote:

Cuchulain wrote:


So using your reasoning above why not deny people equal rights, who kisss, have oral or anal sex? I could actually add many variables here to your methodology of something so different, abnormal and unnatural. The fact is that is not your reason at all, because if it was then you would back and call for all in  these groups to be denied equal rights. Its an excuse you use because of an aversion you have that has made you hate homosexuality. Its emotions driving your reasoning here because as seen above your reasoning falls apart because you do not claim peoiple who have oral sex should be denied the same rights as you.

So cut with the bullshit and for one just admit you have no reason other than a hate you have formed from an aversion you have to homosexuals.

Male and female coupling is the normal and natural way.

I don't hate people for being homosexual, I pity them, And hope that they one day see the error of their ways...

Ecxept I just proved you do.
If you go by your reasoning it falls apart because you do not promote that others be denied equality.
So claiming abnormality and unnatural is a sham and excuse to cover for your hatred and aversion to homosexuality.
For example why is it abnormality is not a crime? You claim male and female coupling is the normal way but that only works in regards to procreation which also homosexuals can perform. Most of the acts like oral sex, anal sex and kissing are not required for procreation. Yet both homosexuals and hetrosexuals engage in these sexual acts that are not required which by your poor methodology makes their acts abnormal. So you are uttely contradicting yourself which is often what hateful people do when their views make no sense.

Second we makes laws based on human rights, for example children have more rights than adults and for good reason. A child is not of a mental and physical age to have sex and is protected by laws. When they are abuised physically or sexually, their rights have been denied. They cannot give conscent due to their mental age, and thus are rightly protected in law.

Claiming abnormality it is one that has no validity as you do not apply this based on the very things you claim make it abnormal through the sexual acts. As homosexuals perform the exact same sexual acts as hetrosexuals do. That leaves only one thing that you then have to deny homosexuals equal rights and that is attraction. So you want to make punishable and a crime attraction, something none of us can control.
It is not a crime to be attracted to anything, which leaves you with only one reason for you denying homosexuals equal rights and that is hate.

Handy Andy wrote:Of course, he could already be there.
Tom Sawyer has identical  beliefs.
Or even worse,TM  could be our old mucker Hugh Jardon.,who Dean banned for criminal hacking and allegedly  has recently  served at her majesty's  pleasure for fraud.
He too had a  phenomenal  IQ,had a huge mansion and drove several Beamer.

Is that right Mmmmm seems plausible i guess

Cuchulain wrote:

Tommy Monk wrote:


Male and female coupling is the normal and natural way.

I don't hate people for being homosexual, I pity them, And hope that they one day see the error of their ways...

Ecxept I just proved you do.
If you go by your reasoning it falls apart because you do not promote that others be denied equality.
So claiming abnormality and unnatural is a sham and excuse to cover for your hatred and aversion to homosexuality.
For example why is it abnormality is not a crime? You claim male and female coupling is the normal way but that only works in regards to procreation which also homosexuals can perform. Most of the acts like oral sex, anal sex and kissing are not required for procreation. Yet both homosexuals and hetrosexuals engage in these sexual acts that are not required which by your poor methodology makes their acts abnormal. So you are uttely contradicting yourself which is often what hateful people do when their views make no sense.

Second we makes laws based on human rights, for example children have more rights than adults and for good reason. A child is not of a mental and physical age to have sex and is protected by laws. When they are abuised physically or sexually, their rights have been denied. They cannot give conscent due to their mental age, and thus are rightly protected in law.

Claiming abnormality it is one that has no validity as you do not apply this based on the very things you claim make it abnormal through the sexual acts. As homosexuals perform the exact same sexual acts as hetrosexuals do. That leaves only one thing that you then have to deny homosexuals equal rights and that is attraction. So you want to make punishable and a crime attraction, something none of us can control.
It is not a crime to be attracted to anything, which leaves you with only one reason for you denying homosexuals equal rights and that is hate.

have a rep point

Cuchulain wrote:

Tommy Monk wrote:


Male and female coupling is the normal and natural way.

I don't hate people for being homosexual, I pity them, And hope that they one day see the error of their ways...

Ecxept I just proved you do.
If you go by your reasoning it falls apart because you do not promote that others be denied equality.
So claiming abnormality and unnatural is a sham and excuse to cover for your hatred and aversion to homosexuality.
For example why is it abnormality is not a crime? You claim male and female coupling is the normal way but that only works in regards to procreation which also homosexuals can perform. Most of the acts like oral sex, anal sex and kissing are not required for procreation. Yet both homosexuals and hetrosexuals engage in these sexual acts that are not required which by your poor methodology makes their acts abnormal. So you are uttely contradicting yourself which is often what hateful people do when their views make no sense.

Second we makes laws based on human rights, for example children have more rights than adults and for good reason. A child is not of a mental and physical age to have sex and is protected by laws. When they are abuised physically or sexually, their rights have been denied. They cannot give conscent due to their mental age, and thus are rightly protected in law.

Claiming abnormality it is one that has no validity as you do not apply this based on the very things you claim make it abnormal through the sexual acts. As homosexuals perform the exact same sexual acts as hetrosexuals do. That leaves only one thing that you then have to deny homosexuals equal rights and that is attraction. So you want to make punishable and a crime attraction, something none of us can control.
It is not a crime to be attracted to anything, which leaves you with only one reason for you denying homosexuals equal rights and that is hate.

Don't often agree,Didge but as KD said,bloody good post. Agree 100% with that.

korban dallas wrote:

Tommy Monk wrote:I know you're a bit slow on the uptake but this is getting ridiculous now!!!



I was not replying to the bit you think!!!


I was replying to the bit above where you questioned the hour time of test with a selective quote of MY earlier post saying "15 minutes went past...(etc)" when I actually said "ANOTHER 15 minutes went past..." and that was taken out of The rest of The post which went into detail about all the rest of The hour time I was doing the test!!!

!!!???

wow desperate or what 3 pages of me referring to the google bit i highlighted and and him trying to twist

And all of a sudden out the blue he changes his premise and brings up something he did  not even mentioned in 3 pages
Houston we are going to need a bigger hole





your so funny your like the gift that keeps on giving

the better question is
What is wrong with you!!!???

Are you really this dense!!!???


I have already mentioned this more than once but you just failed to understand it!!!





Do you honestly think I would be claiming victors addition to my post as my own words!!!???


And do you honestly think I would be able to Google answers quicker than answering the questions in seconds myself!!!???


You Are as thick as shit and probably twice as smelly!!!


I can't believe how long it has taken you to see what I've been saying all along!!!


But now you still think it is something new I've said although I have said it plenty already!!!


What a twat!!!


Your level of stupid is painful for me!!!

Thanks Korben and Handy Andy.
It is easy to see past illogical views and as seen Tommy is using abnormality as an excuse for his hate and it proves that he is led by his emotions. So even if we are to believe he has a IQ that places him at genius level, which I certainly do not believe he clearly is not able to aplly this intelligence because his negative emotions rule his reasoning.