homosexuality is man made!!!!

by Guest Fri Jun 05, 2015 1:09 pm

First topic message reminder :

and i guess woman made too...

by Original Quill Sat Jun 06, 2015 6:17 pm

heavenlyfatheragain wrote:It appears that if it gives pleasure it is normal and ok...

If someone stuck razor blades in themselves because it gave them an orgasm would that be considered normal and ok.

You have a theory of "normalcy", hf? Oh please...you're on a roll. Let's hear it.

homosexuality is man made!!!! - Page 2 386bf30

by Guest Sat Jun 06, 2015 6:21 pm

many things in life are normal such as heterosexuality the figures support this...

by Original Quill Sat Jun 06, 2015 6:31 pm

Raggamuffin wrote:Too much info on this thread.

No it's not. I am constantly dumbfounded by how little people know about their own bodies...especially about the sex parts. Especially in America, where they used to circumcise about 85% of males at birth. There were people who didn't even know the functions of foreskins, let alone how to spell it.

I reckon this aggressive ignorance is owing to Christian idiocracy...so it's a pleasure to see it 'outed'.

"Water? Like out of the toilet? "

"If you have one bucket that contains 2 gallons and another bucket that contains 7 gallons, how many buckets do you have?"

homosexuality is man made!!!! - Page 2 3489511464

homosexuality is man made!!!! - Page 2 3489511464

by Original Quill Sat Jun 06, 2015 6:34 pm

heavenlyfatheragain wrote:many things in life are normal such as heterosexuality the figures support this...

But proof. This is a high-class place, hf. We demand proof.

1. Prove the "figgurs" support the idea of normalcy. Please explain the connection.

2. What do the figgurs prove?

by Guest Sat Jun 06, 2015 8:00 pm

Original Quill wrote:
heavenlyfatheragain wrote:many things in life are normal such as heterosexuality the figures support this...

But proof. This is a high-class place, hf. We demand proof.

1. Prove the "figgurs" support the idea of normalcy. Please explain the connection.

2. What do the figgurs prove?

So you do not think that over 90% straight proves that is normal and the tiny minority of gays proves they are not normal... how queer... Smile

by eddie Sat Jun 06, 2015 8:52 pm

heavenlyfatheragain wrote:
Original Quill wrote:
heavenlyfatheragain wrote:many things in life are normal such as heterosexuality the figures support this...

But proof. This is a high-class place, hf. We demand proof.

1. Prove the "figgurs" support the idea of normalcy. Please explain the connection.

2. What do the figgurs prove?

So you do not think that over 90% straight proves that is normal and the tiny minority of gays proves they are not normal... how queer...

Thats a really bad cop out

by Guest Sat Jun 06, 2015 8:54 pm

eddie wrote:
heavenlyfatheragain wrote:

So you do not think that over 90% straight proves that is normal and the tiny minority of gays proves they are not normal... how queer...

Thats a really bad cop out

it's actually over 90% i was being kind, so you do not think that over 90% represents the normal...

by Guest Sat Jun 06, 2015 9:38 pm

heavenlyfatheragain wrote:
eddie wrote:

Thats a really bad cop out

it's actually over 90% i was being kind, so you do not think that over 90% represents the normal...

Absurd reasoning again.
Red hair occurs naturally in 1–2% of the human population.
If this occurs naturally, then your methodology to gauge a big percentage over a small percentage of humans as your measure to what is natural and what is unnatural is utterly flawed.
You thus have humans in a small minority that are very natural.
Hence your reasoning is flawed.

by Guest Sun Jun 07, 2015 1:20 am

Belatucadros wrote:
heavenlyfatheragain wrote:

it's actually over 90% i was being kind, so you do not think that over 90% represents the normal...

Absurd reasoning again.
Red hair occurs naturally in 1–2% of the human population.
If this occurs naturally, then your methodology to gauge a big percentage over a small percentage of humans as your measure to what is natural and what is unnatural is utterly flawed.
You thus have humans in a small minority that are very natural.
Hence your reasoning is flawed.

of course it is not flawed over 90% are normal and the rest are abnormal, the figures say it all...

by Guest Sun Jun 07, 2015 1:24 am

heavenlyfatheragain wrote:
Belatucadros wrote:

Absurd reasoning again.
Red hair occurs naturally in 1–2% of the human population.
If this occurs naturally, then your methodology to gauge a big percentage over a small percentage of humans as your measure to what is natural and what is unnatural is utterly flawed.
You thus have humans in a small minority that are very natural.
Hence your reasoning is flawed.

of course it is not flawed over 90% are normal and the rest are abnormal, the figures say it all...

I just proved it is flawed.
I also proved you are as ignorant as fuck for not even understanding it is flawed.
You just decided what to you is normal based off percentages, not any reasoning.
Dibs is lovely, but you truly are one ignorant fuckwit.
Oh and by the way two wrongs do not make a right, there is never an excuse for people to abuse each other. There is also no justification to some of the things you say.

by Guest Sun Jun 07, 2015 1:33 am

Belatucadros wrote:
heavenlyfatheragain wrote:

of course it is not flawed over 90% are normal and the rest are abnormal, the figures say it all...

I just proved it is flawed.
I also proved you are as ignorant as fuck for not even understanding it is flawed.
You just decided what to you is normal based off percentages, not any reasoning.
Dibs is lovely, but you truly are one ignorant fuckwit.
Oh and by the way two wrongs do not make a right, there is never an excuse for people to abuse each other. There is also no justification to some of the things you say.

look over 90% know where a dick should go and the rest think the poop chute is a good idea, what do you think the likely hood of the 90% being abnormal and the others being normal.. it's just can't be right can it...

I have a right to react in any way i feel is right, i'm just an ordinary bloke ho gets sick of tards telling me my opinion is wrong, if they want to throw insults no problem I'll throw them back, All Christians are just ordinary people who have faith, prick us do we not bleed.... Christians are not door mats, we stand up for our beliefs... in a world that says more and more often you can have your beliefs but you can not live your beliefs.....

so while decrying my attitude you decide to call me a fuckit, so you sir make yourself fair game...

by Guest Sun Jun 07, 2015 1:38 am

heavenlyfatheragain wrote:
Belatucadros wrote:

I just proved it is flawed.
I also proved you are as ignorant as fuck for not even understanding it is flawed.
You just decided what to you is normal based off percentages, not any reasoning.
Dibs is lovely, but you truly are one ignorant fuckwit.
Oh and by the way two wrongs do not make a right, there is never an excuse for people to abuse each other. There is also no justification to some of the things you say.

look over 90% know where a dick should go and the rest think the poop chute is a good idea, what do you think the likely hood of the 90% being abnormal and the others being normal.. it's just can't be right can it...

I have a right to react in any way i feel is right, i'm just an ordinary bloke ho gets sick of tards telling me my opinion is wrong, if they want to throw insults no problem I'll throw them back, All Christians are just ordinary people who have faith, prick us do we not bleed.... Christians are not door mats, we stand up for our beliefs... in a world that says more and more often you can have your beliefs but you can not live your beliefs.....

so while decrying my attitude you decide to call me a fuckit, so you sir make yourself fair game...

Talk about pathetic excuses, so your reasoning now is not any reason of validity to homosexuality being natural. It is about being nasty, to those who disagree with you.
Grow the fuck up you child.
Your methodology on percentages is utterly flawed to claim what is natural or unnatural. As seen its completely daft.

by Guest Sun Jun 07, 2015 1:43 am

Belatucadros wrote:
heavenlyfatheragain wrote:

look over 90% know where a dick should go and the rest think the poop chute is a good idea, what do you think the likely hood of the 90% being abnormal and the others being normal.. it's just can't be right can it...

I have a right to react in any way i feel is right, i'm just an ordinary bloke ho gets sick of tards telling me my opinion is wrong, if they want to throw insults no problem I'll throw them back, All Christians are just ordinary people who have faith, prick us do we not bleed.... Christians are not door mats, we stand up for our beliefs... in a world that says more and more often you can have your beliefs but you can not live your beliefs.....

so while decrying my attitude you decide to call me a fuckit, so you sir make yourself fair game...

Talk about pathetic excuses, so your reasoning now is not any reason of validity to homosexuality being natural. It is about being nasty, to those who disagree with you.
Grow the fuck up you child.
Your methodology on percentages is utterly flawed to claim what is natural or unnatural. As seen its completely daft.

there you go swearing and calling again,

see it's not nice is it...

90% over normal and straight, the remainder abnormal and gay, i cannot see those figures as flawed, all that is flawed is your ability to accept the truth as it shatters your illusions of gay Christians...

by Eilzel Sun Jun 07, 2015 1:51 am

The fact you see sex and predominant over love makes me feel sorry for VoD...

by Guest Sun Jun 07, 2015 1:54 am

Eilzel wrote:The fact you see sex and predominant over love makes me feel sorry for VoD...

you worry about your lady boy, he's the one who will end up with the prolapsed bowel...

by Ben Reilly Sun Jun 07, 2015 2:16 am

heavenlyfatheragain wrote:so because animals engage in homosexual acts we should, are we suppose to be better than the animals or not..

when dogs and cats first me they often sniff each others butts or genitals should we do the same as humans???

To dogs and cats, scent identifies others the way faces do for us.

by Eilzel Sun Jun 07, 2015 2:26 am

Funny how religious people are always the ones obsessed with sex, must be so difficult to live with those self imposed restrictions.

by Ben Reilly Sun Jun 07, 2015 7:08 am

Eilzel wrote:Funny how religious people are always the ones obsessed with sex, must be so difficult to live with those self imposed restrictions.

That's so true! Smile

by Original Quill Sun Jun 07, 2015 8:21 am

Nor·mal·i·ty [nôrˈmalədē]: the condition of being normal; the state of being usual, typical, or expected; conforming to a standard; usual, typical, or expected.

Plurality [ploo-ral-i-tee]: inter alia More than half of the whole; the majority.

Normal does not mean most, or any other quantitative expression. The term derives from 'norm', which means standard or typical.

Now hf, do you or do you not have a handle on what is normal? Give us your proof.

by eddie Sun Jun 07, 2015 8:23 am

heavenlyfatheragain wrote:
Eilzel wrote:The fact you see sex and predominant over love makes me feel sorry for VoD...

you worry about your lady boy, he's the one who will end up with the prolapsed bowel...

See this is why you always let yourself down.
You don't do debate, you just insult.

by Guest Sun Jun 07, 2015 5:12 pm

eddie wrote:
heavenlyfatheragain wrote:

you worry about your lady boy, he's the one who will end up with the prolapsed bowel...

See this is why you always let yourself down.
You don't do debate, you just insult.

and did you miss who was using the abusive language, come on edds i thought you were fair, lol

who am I kidding..

by Eilzel Sun Jun 07, 2015 5:28 pm

The vulgar and insulting language first came from you (poop shoots, perversions etc) so don't play innocent, we all know what a low life troll you are after all these years- you are even on flap's very limited banned list.

by Guest Sun Jun 07, 2015 6:06 pm

back to topic, homosexuality is clearly created by humanity as a perversion from the normal heterosexuality...

by Guest Sun Jun 07, 2015 6:07 pm

lez come on now you're vulgar too we consider your remarks vulgar it is all down to what people find vulgar isn't .

by eddie Sun Jun 07, 2015 6:25 pm

heavenlyfatheragain wrote:
eddie wrote:
heavenlyfatheragain wrote:

you worry about your lady boy, he's the one who will end up with the prolapsed bowel...

See this is why you always let yourself down.
You don't do debate, you just insult.

and did you miss who was using the abusive language, come on edds i thought you were fair, lol

who am I kidding..

Direct me to the post please where you were insulted in the manner you've just insulted this poster.

by Raggamuffin Sun Jun 07, 2015 6:28 pm

risingsun wrote:No of course you can't, because you're afraid to discuss the human body and try and make it dirty.

More because of your ludicrous argument actually.

by Raggamuffin Sun Jun 07, 2015 6:30 pm

Eilzel wrote:You see raggs, when someone suggests religion is man made they back it up, over and over again.

HF is unable to back his idiotic claim here (he's obviously trolling anyway) and instead chooses to use vulgar and offensive language. That you credit this guy as remotely intelligent is baffling.

You see, when someone says that faith or religion is unnatural, someone will counter that with something else being unnatural.

by Guest Sun Jun 07, 2015 6:32 pm

heavenlyfatheragain wrote:back to topic, homosexuality is clearly created by humanity as a perversion from the normal heterosexuality...

can we stay on topic please folks...thanks ever so!!!

by Original Quill Sun Jun 07, 2015 6:52 pm

heavenlyfatheragain wrote:back to topic, homosexuality is clearly created by humanity as a perversion from the normal heterosexuality...

Why is this "clear"? You use the term "normal", but when challenged you have no definition for it. You resort to quantitative argument, which is not only morally devoid (which is where you are gong--see below), but really, incorrect.

I fear you are heading into a logical morass that tommy got himself into a few months ago. If you asked him what normal was, he would say natural. If you asked him what natural was, he would say normal. It was classic circular definition: The definition includes the term being defined as a part of the definition.

Those who fall into this trap generally have a meaning that signifies something only onto themselves. And therein: it is usually a hiding of a factual inaccuracy.

In your case, you are trying to make something of homosexuality that isn't true. You are trying to isolate and exile homosexuality, the practice, from some imaginary realm of acceptance, called normality, and thereby condemn it morally and socially. You are implying that some host--the people--approve of you and your argument, over someone else's view.

But it truth, homosexuality is becoming accepted, and contrary to your assertion...it is becoming, if it has not already become quite normal. It may not be plural, or even substantial, but as didge points out, neither is red hair, and no one is shaming red-headed people.

by Guest Sun Jun 07, 2015 7:16 pm

If all of HF's cult think like this then perhaps there is a case for having the cult outlawed as it obviously promotes hate speech and hateful attitudes....

it should perhaps become a "proscribed organisation"

by Raggamuffin Sun Jun 07, 2015 7:17 pm

darknessss wrote:If all of HF's cult think like this then perhaps there is a case for having the cult outlawed as it obviously promotes hate speech and hateful attitudes....

it should perhaps become a "proscribed organisation"

What cult would that be?

by Guest Sun Jun 07, 2015 7:24 pm

Original Quill wrote:
heavenlyfatheragain wrote:back to topic, homosexuality is clearly created by humanity as a perversion from the normal heterosexuality...

Why is this "clear"? You use the term "normal", but when challenged you have no definition for it. You resort to quantitative argument, which is not only morally devoid (which is where you are gong--see below), but really, incorrect.

I fear you are heading into a logical morass that tommy got himself into a few months ago. If you asked him what normal was, he would say natural. If you asked him what natural was, he would say normal. It was classic circular definition: The definition includes the term being defined as a part of the definition.

Those who fall into this trap generally have a meaning that signifies something only onto themselves. And therein: it is usually a hiding of a factual inaccuracy.

In your case, you are trying to make something of homosexuality that isn't true. You are trying to isolate and exile homosexuality, the practice, from some imaginary realm of acceptance, called normality, and thereby condemn it morally and socially. You are implying that some host--the people--approve of you and your argument, over someone else's view.

But it truth, homosexuality is becoming accepted, and contrary to your assertion...it is becoming, if it has not already become quite normal. It may not be plural, or even substantial, but as didge points out, neither is red hair, and no one is shaming red-headed people.

we could say the same for you athieists who say without a doubt Christianity is fake .

by Guest Sun Jun 07, 2015 7:29 pm

Eilzel wrote:Funny how religious people are always the ones obsessed with sex, must be so difficult to live with those self imposed restrictions.

God made sex so what's wrong with enjoying it . Maybe you don't enjoy it because you're not supposed to have he type of sex you have chosen , just saying Razz

by Guest Sun Jun 07, 2015 7:31 pm

darknessss wrote:If all of HF's cult think like this then perhaps there is a case for having the cult outlawed as it obviously promotes hate speech and hateful attitudes....

it should perhaps become a "proscribed organisation"

so you are against people have an opposing opinion, if people who disagreed with homosexuality stood together and lawfully outlawed the practice altogether you would consider that unfair...

i understand your brand of equality it seems prevalent in here and in many walks of life..

by Raggamuffin Sun Jun 07, 2015 7:34 pm

Eilzel wrote:Funny how religious people are always the ones obsessed with sex, must be so difficult to live with those self imposed restrictions.

Oh dear - you're generalising a bit there.

by Guest Sun Jun 07, 2015 7:39 pm

Eilzel wrote:Funny how religious people are always the ones obsessed with sex, must be so difficult to live with those self imposed restrictions.

Have to agree with this. What happens between two consensual adults in private is no concern of others. Why not enjoy each other, nobody has the right to judge. It's personal, natural and part of being in a loving, close relationship homosexuality is man made!!!! - Page 2 Love_h10

homosexuality is man made!!!! - Page 2 Love_h10

by Guest Sun Jun 07, 2015 7:41 pm

heavenlyfatheragain wrote:
darknessss wrote:If all of HF's cult think like this then perhaps there is a case for having the cult outlawed as it obviously promotes hate speech and hateful attitudes....

it should perhaps become a "proscribed organisation"

so you are against people have an opposing opinion, if people who disagreed with homosexuality stood together and lawfully outlawed the practice altogether you would consider that unfair...

i understand your brand of equality it seems prevalent in here and in many walks of life..

i would indeed...since...

clearly you would in that case be outlawing something which has NO effect on you and in which you have no "interest" (of the legal sort) that is to say

FOR example....If the village 10 miles away from you gets an application for a housing estate YOU cannot object, as in make a lawful objection to the plan, in fact if you were to you would be ignored. This is because YOU have no interest (in the legal sense ie you own no property in it and have no stake in it)

likewise you have NO right to "object" to homosexuality, since YOU have no "lawful interest"

all you are is a nosey old hypocrite who lives a far from perfect life yourself, and merely wishes to impose you sick "rules" on others....

(you may wish to note that generally accepting homosexuality DOES NOT !impose " anything on you, except your normal reasonable duty to "live and let live" So dont come the "gays are "forcing " their way on you"... nonsense.....

THEY are not forcing you to do anything except be civil and decent.....

the fact you are a first rate primitive, stupid, and unable to think beyond your own self serving little world is irrelevant....

by Guest Sun Jun 07, 2015 7:42 pm

feelthelove wrote:
Eilzel wrote:Funny how religious people are always the ones obsessed with sex, must be so difficult to live with those self imposed restrictions.

Have to agree with this. What happens between two consensual adults in private is no concern of others. Why not enjoy each other, nobody has the right to judge. It's personal, natural and part of being in a loving, close relationship

the same argument for people of faith isn't it . Equality works both ways or it should do

by Raggamuffin Sun Jun 07, 2015 7:44 pm

feelthelove wrote:
Eilzel wrote:Funny how religious people are always the ones obsessed with sex, must be so difficult to live with those self imposed restrictions.

Have to agree with this. What happens between two consensual adults in private is no concern of others. Why not enjoy each other, nobody has the right to judge. It's personal, natural and part of being in a loving, close relationship

You agree that religious people are always the ones obsessed with sex?

Dear oh dear.

For a start, religious people are not always obsessed with sex. Secondly, if we're talking about homosexuality, not all religious people have a problem with it, and in addition to that, those who have a problem with it are not necessarily religious.

I think the generalising on here is clear to see, and yet those who do it are usually the first to complain when others do it.

by Guest Sun Jun 07, 2015 7:46 pm

Vicar of Dibley wrote:
feelthelove wrote:

Have to agree with this. What happens between two consensual adults in private is no concern of others. Why not enjoy each other, nobody has the right to judge. It's personal, natural and part of being in a loving, close relationship

the same argument for people of faith isn't it . Equality works both ways or it should do

except "people of certain faiths live by attempting to force, intimidate, scare other folks into their "ways". they are self righteous pricks and claim to have the ONLY truth

homosexuals merely want to live as "ordinary citizens, without fear or hatered or scorn being heaped upon them by semi literate moron waving a "holy book" as their cover for their bile....

by Raggamuffin Sun Jun 07, 2015 7:47 pm

darknessss wrote:
Vicar of Dibley wrote:

the same argument for people of faith isn't it . Equality works both ways or it should do

except "people of certain faiths live by attempting to force, intimidate, scare other folks into their "ways". they are self righteous pricks and claim to have the ONLY truth

homosexuals merely want to live as "ordinary citizens, without fear or hatered or scorn being heaped upon them by semi literate moron waving a "holy book" as their cover for their bile....

Which "certain faiths" would those be?

by Guest Sun Jun 07, 2015 7:47 pm

Raggamuffin wrote:
feelthelove wrote:

Have to agree with this. What happens between two consensual adults in private is no concern of others. Why not enjoy each other, nobody has the right to judge. It's personal, natural and part of being in a loving, close relationship

You agree that religious people are always the ones obsessed with sex?

especially when its someone elses sexual practices....but never when its their own

Dear oh dear.

For a start, religious people are not always obsessed with sex. Secondly, if we're talking about homosexuality, not all religious people have a problem with it, and in addition to that, those who have a problem with it are not necessarily religious.

I think the generalising on here is clear to see, and yet those who do it are usually the first to complain when others do it.

by Guest Sun Jun 07, 2015 7:47 pm

Raggamuffin wrote:
darknessss wrote:

except "people of certain faiths live by attempting to force, intimidate, scare other folks into their "ways". they are self righteous pricks and claim to have the ONLY truth

homosexuals merely want to live as "ordinary citizens, without fear or hatered or scorn being heaped upon them by semi literate moron waving a "holy book" as their cover for their bile....

Which "certain faiths" would those be?

in particular those who have a "holy book"

by Raggamuffin Sun Jun 07, 2015 7:48 pm

darknessss wrote:
Raggamuffin wrote:

Which "certain faiths" would those be?

in particular those who have a "holy book"

Oh I see.

Another one who's generalising. That makes three of you so far.

Any more?

by Guest Sun Jun 07, 2015 7:51 pm

Christians also want to live without fear of being judged and hated , where do we go from here ?

by Guest Sun Jun 07, 2015 7:51 pm

darknessss wrote:
Vicar of Dibley wrote:

the same argument for people of faith isn't it . Equality works both ways or it should do

except "people of certain faiths live by attempting to force, intimidate, scare other folks into their "ways". they are self righteous pricks and claim to have the ONLY truth

homosexuals merely want to live as "ordinary citizens, without fear or hatered or scorn being heaped upon them by semi literate moron waving a "holy book" as their cover for their bile....

no one forces gays one way or the other, when you demand the opinion of gays to be accepted that is forcing people who do not accept it is right or normal to believe or even not to say it is wrong or not normal...
so you are doing the forcing, so are you the hater, you don't want equality, you don't even know what equality is...

no Christians fear or hate gays, now islam hangs gays so go argue with them, if you dare...

by Guest Sun Jun 07, 2015 8:01 pm

Raggamuffin wrote:
feelthelove wrote:

Have to agree with this. What happens between two consensual adults in private is no concern of others. Why not enjoy each other, nobody has the right to judge. It's personal, natural and part of being in a loving, close relationship

You agree that religious people are always the ones obsessed with sex?

Dear oh dear.

For a start, religious people are not always obsessed with sex. Secondly, if we're talking about homosexuality, not all religious people have a problem with it, and in addition to that, those who have a problem with it are not necessarily religious.

I think the generalising on here is clear to see, and yet those who do it are usually the first to complain when others do it.

Sorry I should have made myself clearer, I meant the part about living with self imposed restrictions. Couples should be free to enjoy each other. It's not for others to judge what is acceptable for consensual adults, it doesn't affect anyone other than the couple involved.

Religious or otherwise people are entitled to their opinion but I am a firm believer in live and let live. I wouldn't accept anyone telling me who I should and shouldn't fall in love with. It's no one's business

by Guest Sun Jun 07, 2015 8:03 pm

but feelthelove the same thing can be said about none believers who constantly tell Christians they are wrong and that Christianity is fake . Where is the difference ?

by Guest Sun Jun 07, 2015 8:04 pm

heavenlyfatheragain wrote:
darknessss wrote:

except "people of certain faiths live by attempting to force, intimidate, scare other folks into their "ways". they are self righteous pricks and claim to have the ONLY truth

homosexuals merely want to live as "ordinary citizens, without fear or hatered or scorn being heaped upon them by semi literate moron waving a "holy book" as their cover for their bile....

no one forces gays one way or the other, when you demand the opinion of gays to be accepted that is forcing people who do not accept it is right or normal to believe or even not to say it is wrong or not normal...
so you are doing the forcing, so are you the hater, you don't want equality, you don't even know what equality is...

no Christians fear or hate gays, now islam hangs gays so go argue with them, if you dare...

I agree ...I would force silence on that opinion upon the bigots (though in truth they are better out in the open so everyone can see them for the twats they are)

SINCE the practice of homosexuality causes YOU no problem (except in your tiny single cell brain) AND given that you have NO interest (in the legal sense) in it the you DO NOT have the right to openly espouse an opinion which is calculated by its rhetoric to denigrate insult or cause diquiet, to those who do.

see THIS is the bit you cant grasp, because you are a religious interfering old bigot....

ITS GOT SOD ALL to do with you ..........so really...STFU

(Oh and before you try to turn that round and say its nowt to do with me either...YES IT HAS....because....I stand for the right to live ones life "unbothered " by sanctimonious old idiots .........provided whatever you are doing is not of harm to others....which your cult is (of harm to others)

by Raggamuffin Sun Jun 07, 2015 8:09 pm

Whether people believe in God or not has sod all to do with anyone else either, but you'd think it did the way some people on here bang on.