Man Who Complained About Breastfeeding Mother Gets Thrown Out Of Cafe

by Guest Sun May 31, 2015 8:42 pm

First topic message reminder :

When a man complained to a cafe owner about a woman breastfeeding nearby, she was having none of it.
The “middle-aged gentleman” told the owner of Cheese and Biscuits cafe “there was a mother breastfeeding out there and we might want to ask her to cover up”, according to the Sydney Morning Herald. But Jessica-Anne Allen was thoroughly unimpressed and asked him to leave her establishment in Queensland, Australia,
She said: ”We told him that we are a breastfeeding friendly cafe, that we have mothers' groups and ladies who come and breastfeed all the time and we would never ask a mother to cover up when she is feeding her child.

http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2015/05/31/man-who-complained-breastfeeding-mother-thrown-out-of-cafe_n_7479136.html?utm_hp_ref=uk

Well done to the cafe owner.

by Raggamuffin Wed Jun 03, 2015 9:25 am

Where was Ben when Didge was calling paedophiles?

by Guest Wed Jun 03, 2015 9:25 am

Raggamuffin wrote:You can't disagree with Didge on here without being harassed.

Man Who Complained About Breastfeeding Mother Gets Thrown Out Of Cafe - Page 4 Victim

by Raggamuffin Wed Jun 03, 2015 9:26 am

Isn't Ben going to say anything about Didge's trolling?

by Guest Wed Jun 03, 2015 9:26 am

Raggamuffin wrote:You can't disagree with Didge on here without being harassed.

Yea right, that's why me and others (including Veya) have a go at Didge loads of times. So if two people disagree with one person it's tag teaming?

by Guest Wed Jun 03, 2015 9:27 am

Raggamuffin wrote:Where was Ben when Didge was calling paedophiles?

Did I apologise for saying this to Korben?

Yes.

Are you trying to shit stir again because you offered up a poor debate here?

Yes

Grow up love there is only so many times you can play the:

Man Who Complained About Breastfeeding Mother Gets Thrown Out Of Cafe - Page 4 Victim

by Guest Wed Jun 03, 2015 9:28 am

Raggamuffin wrote:Isn't Ben going to say anything about Didge's trolling?

Sorry Rags, but you are just making me giggle. Didge and I have huge spats, but in comparison to Shady, he's a novice lol

by Ben Reilly Wed Jun 03, 2015 9:29 am

risingsun wrote:
Raggamuffin wrote:You can't disagree with Didge on here without being harassed.

Yea right, that's why me and others (including Veya) have a go at Didge loads of times. So if two people disagree with one person it's tag teaming?

Was going to make a point of my own but no, this!!!! We disagree with each other here, that's what keeps us popping popcorn. I'd much rather see people agree on some things and fight over others than see alliances and hypocrisy ...

by Guest Wed Jun 03, 2015 9:31 am

Ben_Reilly wrote:
risingsun wrote:

Yea right, that's why me and others (including Veya) have a go at Didge loads of times. So if two people disagree with one person it's tag teaming?

Was going to make a point of my own but no, this!!!! We disagree with each other here, that's what keeps us popping popcorn. I'd much rather see people agree on some things and fight over others than see alliances and hypocrisy ...

Well, back to packing, but the thought of someone harassing Shady gave me a good giggle.

Man Who Complained About Breastfeeding Mother Gets Thrown Out Of Cafe - Page 4 Z

Man Who Complained About Breastfeeding Mother Gets Thrown Out Of Cafe - Page 4 Z

by Raggamuffin Wed Jun 03, 2015 9:33 am

risingsun wrote:
Raggamuffin wrote:You can't disagree with Didge on here without being harassed.

Yea right, that's why me and others (including Veya) have a go at Didge loads of times. So if two people disagree with one person it's tag teaming?

It's tag-teaming when two people talk to each other about another member in a disparaging way. It's my opinion that the forum owner shoudn't do it.

by Ben Reilly Wed Jun 03, 2015 9:34 am

Raggamuffin wrote:
risingsun wrote:
Raggamuffin wrote:You can't disagree with Didge on here without being harassed.

Yea right, that's why me and others (including Veya) have a go at Didge loads of times. So if two people disagree with one person it's tag teaming?

It's tag-teaming when two people talk to each other about another member in a disparaging way. It's my opinion that the forum owner shoudn't do it.

Well, I'm certain you respect my right to have an opinion that differs from your own.

by Raggamuffin Wed Jun 03, 2015 9:35 am

Ben_Reilly wrote:
risingsun wrote:

Yea right, that's why me and others (including Veya) have a go at Didge loads of times. So if two people disagree with one person it's tag teaming?

Was going to make a point of my own but no, this!!!! We disagree with each other here, that's what keeps us popping popcorn. I'd much rather see people agree on some things and fight over others than see alliances and hypocrisy ...

But you're forming an alliance with Didge. You can disagree with Shady without slagging him off to Didge.

by Ben Reilly Wed Jun 03, 2015 9:36 am

risingsun wrote:
Ben_Reilly wrote:
risingsun wrote:

Yea right, that's why me and others (including Veya) have a go at Didge loads of times. So if two people disagree with one person it's tag teaming?

Was going to make a point of my own but no, this!!!! We disagree with each other here, that's what keeps us popping popcorn. I'd much rather see people agree on some things and fight over others than see alliances and hypocrisy ...

Well, back to packing, but the thought of someone harassing Shady gave me a good giggle.

Yeah, Shady cannot be harassed. I'm pretty sure that he could make me cry under the right circumstances.

I don't agree with him at all but I don't think he'd want this precious consideration as though he's not a hard-ass who can take more than his foes can throw at him with a sly grin.

by Ben Reilly Wed Jun 03, 2015 9:37 am

Raggamuffin wrote:
Ben_Reilly wrote:
risingsun wrote:

Yea right, that's why me and others (including Veya) have a go at Didge loads of times. So if two people disagree with one person it's tag teaming?

Was going to make a point of my own but no, this!!!! We disagree with each other here, that's what keeps us popping popcorn. I'd much rather see people agree on some things and fight over others than see alliances and hypocrisy ...

But you're forming an alliance with Didge. You can disagree with Shady without slagging him off to Didge.

Okay, so let me ask -- do I have your permission to be a regular person like everybody else?

by Guest Wed Jun 03, 2015 9:38 am

Raggamuffin wrote:
Ben_Reilly wrote:

Was going to make a point of my own but no, this!!!! We disagree with each other here, that's what keeps us popping popcorn. I'd much rather see people agree on some things and fight over others than see alliances and hypocrisy ...

But you're forming an alliance with Didge. You can disagree with Shady without slagging him off to Didge.

Did you not do the same with Stardesk on the Christian thread.

Seriously give over, if you are going to preach Rags, then do not be caught out doing the same.

Pot kettle black

by Raggamuffin Wed Jun 03, 2015 9:38 am

Ben_Reilly wrote:
Raggamuffin wrote:

But you're forming an alliance with Didge. You can disagree with Shady without slagging him off to Didge.

Okay, so let me ask -- do I have your permission to be a regular person like everybody else?

Are you really asking for my permission?

by Raggamuffin Wed Jun 03, 2015 9:40 am

Belatucadros wrote:
Raggamuffin wrote:

But you're forming an alliance with Didge. You can disagree with Shady without slagging him off to Didge.

Did you not do the same with Stardesk on the Christian thread.

Seriously give over, if you are going to preach Rags, then do not be caught out doing the same.

Pot kettle black

I replied directly to Stardesk.

by Ben Reilly Wed Jun 03, 2015 9:42 am

Raggamuffin wrote:
Ben_Reilly wrote:
Raggamuffin wrote:

But you're forming an alliance with Didge. You can disagree with Shady without slagging him off to Didge.

Okay, so let me ask -- do I have your permission to be a regular person like everybody else?

Are you really asking for my permission?

Absolutely. You're the moral authority here -- let me know what is within my rights, as someone who created a forum for my old forum buddies, had dozens of sign-ups from people I don't know thanks to Phil, welcomed them all in and continually accepts shit like Shady -- a guy who sees a British woman of Asian ancestry and calls her an illegal immigrant bitch -- saying that I must keep my brain in my weak knees. You just tell me how I get to act in light of all that information.

Sounds to me like you think I should just let people bash me, and do nothing in response.

by Guest Wed Jun 03, 2015 9:42 am

Raggamuffin wrote:
Belatucadros wrote:

Did you not do the same with Stardesk on the Christian thread.

Seriously give over, if you are going to preach Rags, then do not be caught out doing the same.

Pot kettle black

I replied directly to Stardesk.

And about him to others.
You have also done the same in regards to me with other posters.
So you really are clutching at straws.

This was a fine debate untill you did as you always do and play the:

Man Who Complained About Breastfeeding Mother Gets Thrown Out Of Cafe - Page 4 Victim

by Raggamuffin Wed Jun 03, 2015 9:44 am

Belatucadros wrote:
Raggamuffin wrote:

I replied directly to Stardesk.

And about him to others.
You have also done the same in regards to me with other posters.
So you really are clutching at straws.

This was a fine debate untill you did as you always do and play the:

You wrecked the thread with your usual trolling and tag-teaming, which was very childish of you.

Who did I tag-team with re Stardesk?

by Guest Wed Jun 03, 2015 9:45 am

Raggamuffin wrote:
Belatucadros wrote:

And about him to others.
You have also done the same in regards to me with other posters.
So you really are clutching at straws.

This was a fine debate untill you did as you always do and play the:

You wrecked the thread with your usual trolling and tag-teaming, which was very childish of you.

Who did I tag-team with re Stardesk?

Go and look and see also where you have done the same in regards to me
Oh pipe down you little brat.

Youa re3 looking for a fight because you argued poorly here and now I am just going to leave you to sulk.

Laughing

by Raggamuffin Wed Jun 03, 2015 9:45 am

Ben_Reilly wrote:
Raggamuffin wrote:

Are you really asking for my permission?

Absolutely. You're the moral authority here -- let me know what is within my rights, as someone who created a forum for my old forum buddies, had dozens of sign-ups from people I don't know thanks to Phil, welcomed them all in and continually accepts shit like Shady -- a guy who sees a British woman of Asian ancestry and calls her an illegal immigrant bitch -- saying that I must keep my brain in my weak knees. You just tell me how I get to act in light of all that information.

Sounds to me like you think I should just let people bash me, and do nothing in response.

So if I say you do not have permission to be a regular person, you'll do as I say?

Nobody bashed you - you started the bashing.

What does this have to do with either of the people you just mentioned?

by Raggamuffin Wed Jun 03, 2015 9:47 am

Belatucadros wrote:
Raggamuffin wrote:

You wrecked the thread with your usual trolling and tag-teaming, which was very childish of you.

Who did I tag-team with re Stardesk?

Go and look and see also where you have done the same in regards to me
Oh pipe down you little brat.

Youa re3 looking for a fight because you argued poorly here and now I am just going to leave you to sulk.

I'm not sulking, and you never leave anything. If you reply to me now, or mention me, we'll know that you have no self-control. Razz

by Ben Reilly Wed Jun 03, 2015 9:48 am

Raggamuffin wrote:
Ben_Reilly wrote:
Raggamuffin wrote:

Are you really asking for my permission?

Absolutely. You're the moral authority here -- let me know what is within my rights, as someone who created a forum for my old forum buddies, had dozens of sign-ups from people I don't know thanks to Phil, welcomed them all in and continually accepts shit like Shady -- a guy who sees a British woman of Asian ancestry and calls her an illegal immigrant bitch -- saying that I must keep my brain in my weak knees. You just tell me how I get to act in light of all that information.

Sounds to me like you think I should just let people bash me, and do nothing in response.

So if I say you do not have permission to be a regular person, you'll do as I say?

Nobody bashed you - you started the bashing.

What does this have to do with either of the people you just mentioned?

I must apologize again -- I'm asking you to take context into consideration, which you don't appear to have the ability to do. Let me just ask you this, is it better to think you're right, or to know it?

by Ben Reilly Wed Jun 03, 2015 9:50 am

Oh, and no -- I'd sooner shoot myself through the brain than let the likes of you tell me what I can and cannot do. No offense, of course.

by Raggamuffin Wed Jun 03, 2015 9:50 am

Ben_Reilly wrote:
Raggamuffin wrote:

So if I say you do not have permission to be a regular person, you'll do as I say?

Nobody bashed you - you started the bashing.

What does this have to do with either of the people you just mentioned?

I must apologize again -- I'm asking you to take context into consideration, which you don't appear to have the ability to do. Let me just ask you this, is it better to think you're right, or to know it?

You see, I don't think you were asking my permission at all, were you? lol!

by Raggamuffin Wed Jun 03, 2015 9:50 am

Ben_Reilly wrote:Oh, and no -- I'd sooner shoot myself through the brain than let the likes of you tell me what I can and cannot do. No offense, of course.

None taken. You on the Scotch again?

by Ben Reilly Wed Jun 03, 2015 9:50 am

Raggamuffin wrote:
Ben_Reilly wrote:
Raggamuffin wrote:

So if I say you do not have permission to be a regular person, you'll do as I say?

Nobody bashed you - you started the bashing.

What does this have to do with either of the people you just mentioned?

I must apologize again -- I'm asking you to take context into consideration, which you don't appear to have the ability to do. Let me just ask you this, is it better to think you're right, or to know it?

You see, I don't think you were asking my permission at all, were you?

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/sarcasm

by Ben Reilly Wed Jun 03, 2015 9:52 am

Raggamuffin wrote:
Ben_Reilly wrote:Oh, and no -- I'd sooner shoot myself through the brain than let the likes of you tell me what I can and cannot do. No offense, of course.

None taken. You on the Scotch again?

I've noticed that you share with Shady a deep concern for whether people here have been drinking. Why is that?

I mean, if you're concerned people might have a problem, that's commendable, but it kind of seems like an attempt to distract from the point of discussion.

by Raggamuffin Wed Jun 03, 2015 9:53 am

Ben_Reilly wrote:
Raggamuffin wrote:

You see, I don't think you were asking my permission at all, were you?

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/sarcasm

I think you're the one who needs to recognise sarcasm when you see it. Wink

by Ben Reilly Wed Jun 03, 2015 9:53 am

Raggamuffin wrote:
Ben_Reilly wrote:
Raggamuffin wrote:

You see, I don't think you were asking my permission at all, were you?

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/sarcasm

I think you're the one who needs to recognise sarcasm when you see it.

OK, let's say I accept that -- you just let me know what you've said sarcastically and I'll re-read it.

by Raggamuffin Wed Jun 03, 2015 9:54 am

Ben_Reilly wrote:
Raggamuffin wrote:

None taken. You on the Scotch again?

I've noticed that you share with Shady a deep concern for whether people here have been drinking. Why is that?

I mean, if you're concerned people might have a problem, that's commendable, but it kind of seems like an attempt to distract from the point of discussion.

I'm not concerned - just wondering why you've got the hump. You were like this the other day too with someone else.

by Raggamuffin Wed Jun 03, 2015 9:55 am

Ben_Reilly wrote:
Raggamuffin wrote:

I think you're the one who needs to recognise sarcasm when you see it.

OK, let's say I accept that -- you just let me know what you've said sarcastically and I'll re-read it.

So if I say you do not have permission to be a regular person, you'll do as I say?

by Ben Reilly Wed Jun 03, 2015 9:56 am

Raggamuffin wrote:
Ben_Reilly wrote:
Raggamuffin wrote:

None taken. You on the Scotch again?

I've noticed that you share with Shady a deep concern for whether people here have been drinking. Why is that?

I mean, if you're concerned people might have a problem, that's commendable, but it kind of seems like an attempt to distract from the point of discussion.

I'm not concerned - just wondering why you've got the hump. You were like this the other day too with someone else.

I get feisty -- as you noted that day Smile

And yeah, I knew your question about my asking permission wasn't meant seriously -- I just took it that way because it allowed me to say something I thought was funny. Yes, I do that. No, I'm not sorry.

by Raggamuffin Wed Jun 03, 2015 9:58 am

Ben_Reilly wrote:
Raggamuffin wrote:

I'm not concerned - just wondering why you've got the hump. You were like this the other day too with someone else.

I get feisty -- as you noted that day

And yeah, I knew your question about my asking permission wasn't meant seriously -- I just took it that way because it allowed me to say something I thought was funny. Yes, I do that. No, I'm not sorry.

It was very funny Ben. See how I'm laughing.

Man Who Complained About Breastfeeding Mother Gets Thrown Out Of Cafe - Page 4 3489511464

by Ben Reilly Wed Jun 03, 2015 9:59 am

Raggamuffin wrote:
Ben_Reilly wrote:
Raggamuffin wrote:

I'm not concerned - just wondering why you've got the hump. You were like this the other day too with someone else.

I get feisty -- as you noted that day

And yeah, I knew your question about my asking permission wasn't meant seriously -- I just took it that way because it allowed me to say something I thought was funny. Yes, I do that. No, I'm not sorry.

It was very funny Ben. See how I'm laughing.

Man Who Complained About Breastfeeding Mother Gets Thrown Out Of Cafe - Page 4 Was-that-sarcasm

by Ben Reilly Wed Jun 03, 2015 10:37 am

Hey Raggs -- if people didn't argue here, would you still keep logging on?

I wouldn't ... Smile

by Raggamuffin Wed Jun 03, 2015 10:58 am

Ben_Reilly wrote:Hey Raggs -- if people didn't argue here, would you still keep logging on?

I wouldn't ...

I'm not going to answer that on the grounds that I might incriminate myself. Laughing

by Raggamuffin Wed Jun 03, 2015 12:31 pm

So anyway, if mothers groups' come in all the time to the cafe, clearly they have chosen it to have their meetings. Maybe the owner should advertise the cafe as a mothers' meeting place with breastfeeding, so that those who don't particularly want to be surrounded by people discussing how much milk they're expressing can go elsewhere and not waste their time going to that particular cafe.

I would also suggest that she keeps her complaints about customers off the internet, and doesn't get in a rage every time someone does something against her policy. I see that the woman who was breastfeeding wanted to remain anonymous, and I'm not at all surprised - I don't suppose she wants her private business splashed all over the internet either.

by Fuzzy Zack Wed Jun 03, 2015 12:34 pm

I think fathers need to start breastfeeding.

It is medically possible.

by Guest Wed Jun 03, 2015 12:36 pm

Raggamuffin wrote:So anyway, if mothers groups' come in all the time to the cafe, clearly they have chosen it to have their meetings. Maybe the owner should advertise the cafe as a mothers' meeting place with breastfeeding, so that those who don't particularly want to be surrounded by people discussing how much milk they're expressing can go elsewhere and not waste their time going to that particular cafe.

I would also suggest that she keeps her complaints about customers off the internet, and doesn't get in a rage every time someone does something against her policy. I see that the woman who was breastfeeding wanted to remain anonymous, and I'm not at all surprised - I don't suppose she wants her private business splashed all over the internet either.

Now you are just making up more things that are all subjective.
Again its a cafe.
Customers should not go up to other customers, after being told it is breastfeeding friendly.
Again the cafe owner rightly exposed the idiot who know doubt lives by victorian morals.

by Raggamuffin Wed Jun 03, 2015 12:39 pm

Belatucadros wrote:
Raggamuffin wrote:So anyway, if mothers groups' come in all the time to the cafe, clearly they have chosen it to have their meetings. Maybe the owner should advertise the cafe as a mothers' meeting place with breastfeeding, so that those who don't particularly want to be surrounded by people discussing how much milk they're expressing can go elsewhere and not waste their time going to that particular cafe.

I would also suggest that she keeps her complaints about customers off the internet, and doesn't get in a rage every time someone does something against her policy. I see that the woman who was breastfeeding wanted to remain anonymous, and I'm not at all surprised - I don't suppose she wants her private business splashed all over the internet either.

Now you are just making up more things that are all subjective.
Again its a cafe.
Customers should not go up to other customers, after being told it is breastfeeding friendly.
Again the cafe owner rightly exposed the idiot who know doubt lives by victorian morals.

You've been waiting to pounce haven't you? Laughing

All I'm saying is that if the place is full of boobs and milk, other customers might want to avoid it.

People are free to decide what they like and what they don't like. I don't know why some people get so hostile about it.

by Guest Wed Jun 03, 2015 12:40 pm

Raggamuffin wrote:
Belatucadros wrote:

Now you are just making up more things that are all subjective.
Again its a cafe.
Customers should not go up to other customers, after being told it is breastfeeding friendly.
Again the cafe owner rightly exposed the idiot who know doubt lives by victorian morals.

You've been waiting to pounce haven't you?

All I'm saying is that if the place is full of boobs and milk, other customers might want to avoid it.

People are free to decide what they like and what they don't like. I don't know why some people get so hostile about it.

Not really Rags, is just you do post plenty of unfounded assumptions based on your Christian Victorian morality.

Laughing

by Raggamuffin Wed Jun 03, 2015 12:46 pm

Belatucadros wrote:
Raggamuffin wrote:

You've been waiting to pounce haven't you?

All I'm saying is that if the place is full of boobs and milk, other customers might want to avoid it.

People are free to decide what they like and what they don't like. I don't know why some people get so hostile about it.

Not really Rags, is just you do post plenty of unfounded assumptions based on your Christian Victorian morality.

Speaking of assumptions, you are assuming that my views are related to my faith - which is completely wrong. It's also wrong for you to assume it's to do with morality, Victorian or otherwise.

Do try not to trip yourself up. Laughing

It's a matter of personal choice - whether or not one wants to sit in a cafe surrounded by women talking about breastfeeding, babies' bottoms, and the latest fashions in bibs. It's not everyone's cup of tea really.

by Raggamuffin Wed Jun 03, 2015 12:49 pm

I find that there are cafes which certain people gravitate to and others they don't go to. It's to do with the sort of atmosphere they like, amongst other things.

by Guest Wed Jun 03, 2015 12:49 pm

Raggamuffin wrote:
Belatucadros wrote:

Not really Rags, is just you do post plenty of unfounded assumptions based on your Christian Victorian morality.

Speaking of assumptions, you are assuming that my views are related to my faith - which is completely wrong. It's also wrong for you to assume it's to do with morality, Victorian or otherwise.

Do try not to trip yourself up.

It's a matter of personal choice - whether or not one wants to sit in a cafe surrounded by women talking about breastfeeding, babies' bottoms, and the latest fashions in bibs. It's not everyone's cup of tea really.

Some of your views are releated to your faith others seem to stem from negativity.
Its not wrong for me to correctly view you. You may not like it, but I tend to be rather good at it.

Laughing

If someone comes in the cafe and they are bothered by women talking, they really need to look at themselves as to why something so normal would bother them lol and if they do not like it they can go elsewhere.

by Raggamuffin Wed Jun 03, 2015 12:52 pm

Belatucadros wrote:
Raggamuffin wrote:

Speaking of assumptions, you are assuming that my views are related to my faith - which is completely wrong. It's also wrong for you to assume it's to do with morality, Victorian or otherwise.

Do try not to trip yourself up.

It's a matter of personal choice - whether or not one wants to sit in a cafe surrounded by women talking about breastfeeding, babies' bottoms, and the latest fashions in bibs. It's not everyone's cup of tea really.

Some of your views are releated to your faith others seem to stem from negativity.
Its not wrong for me to correctly view you. You may not like it, but I tend to be rather good at it.

If someone comes in the cafe and they are bothered by women talking, they really need to look at themselves as to why something so normal would bother them lol and if they do not like it they can go elsewhere.

Well kindly don't assume which views stem from my faith and which don't. If it was to do with my faith, I'd say so. I've even told you why I'm not keen on breastfeeding - you must have forgotten. Therefore, you're not as "good at it" as you think you are.

I'm actually being very positive here. I'm suggesting ways for the owner to get the clientele which she desires, and I'm looking at both sides. It's you who is being negative by only seeing one side of the issue.

by Raggamuffin Wed Jun 03, 2015 12:56 pm

Belatucadros wrote:
Raggamuffin wrote:

Speaking of assumptions, you are assuming that my views are related to my faith - which is completely wrong. It's also wrong for you to assume it's to do with morality, Victorian or otherwise.

Do try not to trip yourself up.

It's a matter of personal choice - whether or not one wants to sit in a cafe surrounded by women talking about breastfeeding, babies' bottoms, and the latest fashions in bibs. It's not everyone's cup of tea really.

If someone comes in the cafe and they are bothered by women talking, they really need to look at themselves as to why something so normal would bother them lol and if they do not like it they can go elsewhere.

Why do they need to? Why do you feel the need to tell everyone what they should like and what they shouldn't like? It's up to them - it's called freedom of choice, which extends to the freedom to decide what they like or don't like.

They can go elsewhere, but it might be too late if they're already there and a load of women come in and start breastfeeding and gossiping about potties. Still, if one knows the local cafes, one gets to know which type one prefers.

by Guest Wed Jun 03, 2015 12:56 pm

Raggamuffin wrote:
Belatucadros wrote:

Some of your views are releated to your faith others seem to stem from negativity.
Its not wrong for me to correctly view you. You may not like it, but I tend to be rather good at it.

If someone comes in the cafe and they are bothered by women talking, they really need to look at themselves as to why something so normal would bother them lol and if they do not like it they can go elsewhere.

Well kindly don't assume which views stem from my faith and which don't. If it was to do with my faith, I'd say so. I've even told you why I'm not keen on breastfeeding - you must have forgotten. Therefore, you're not as "good at it" as you think you are.

I'm actually being very positive here. I'm suggesting ways for the owner to get the clientele which she desires, and I'm looking at both sides. It's you who is being negative by only seeing one side of the issue.

I can do as I please, just as you often do when viewing people as seen here.
All you are doing is claiming what kind of clientele you desire and have no idea what she might desire, hence a moot point to say the least.

by Raggamuffin Wed Jun 03, 2015 12:59 pm

Belatucadros wrote:
Raggamuffin wrote:

Well kindly don't assume which views stem from my faith and which don't. If it was to do with my faith, I'd say so. I've even told you why I'm not keen on breastfeeding - you must have forgotten. Therefore, you're not as "good at it" as you think you are.

I'm actually being very positive here. I'm suggesting ways for the owner to get the clientele which she desires, and I'm looking at both sides. It's you who is being negative by only seeing one side of the issue.

I can do as I please, just as you often do when viewing people as seen here.
All you are doing is claiming what kind of clientele you desire and have no idea what she might desire, hence a moot point to say the least.

What a childish reply - you can do as you please, but if you make a tit of yourself, I'll let you know. Pun intended. Laughing

Why shouldn't I decide what kind of clientele I prefer? That's why I go to a certain cafe - I like the sort of people who I see there. She can decide too, and she has, but there was no need for her to get so arsy about it.

by Guest Wed Jun 03, 2015 1:00 pm

Raggamuffin wrote:
Belatucadros wrote:

If someone comes in the cafe and they are bothered by women talking, they really need to look at themselves as to why something so normal would bother them lol and if they do not like it they can go elsewhere.

Why do they need to? Why do you feel the need to tell everyone what they should like and what they shouldn't like? It's up to them - it's called freedom of choice, which extends to the freedom to decide what they like or don't like.

They can go elsewhere, but it might be too late if they're already there and a load of women come in and start breastfeeding and gossiping about potties. Still, if one knows the local cafes, one gets to know which type one prefers.

The answer to that again is tough shit.
Again they are the backward idiots living in a by-gone age where they feel awkward about.
I would question the very fact why they would get so easily bothered about women talk and then going to a place where that is likley to take place. It shows your views are all backwards. Clearly someone at odds with such a thing would not frequent busy areas, but out of the way places if they cherish quite. Some Libraries now cater such things are suich a place.
Your views really are two dimentional when you fail to see such an individual no doubt would be bothered by many kinds of talking.

by Sponsored content