Iowa man insists he couldn’t have sexually assaulted sleeping woman because she’s ‘not even rapable’

n Iowa man who was arrested for sexual abuse of an incapacitated woman insisted to police that he couldn’t have committed the crime because the victim was “not even rapable” by his standards.  According to a probable cause document obtained by Headline News, 36-year-old William Francis Miller assaulted the woman in May of 2014 after a night of drinking with friends.

The police report indicated that the group of friends had gone to sleep, and it described the victim as “incapacitated.” That’s when Miller removed the woman’s underwear and began to have sex with her, police said. One of the woman’s friend’s was said to have witnessed the attack and told Miller to stop. Miller admitted to police during an interview that he had intercourse with the victim, but he said that she had consented to the sex. Miller defended himself by saying that, by his own standards, the woman was “not even rapable,” the charging document said.
After being arrested on May 7, Miller was being held at Johnson County Jail in lieu of $26,000 bond. A court appearance is scheduled for May 18.


http://www.rawstory.com/2015/05/iowa-man-insists-he-couldnt-have-sexually-assaulted-sleeping-woman-because-shes-not-even-rapable/

What does that even mean? If it means that he didn't find her attractive, why did he had sex with her?

It reminds me of a case in the UK where a woman said she had been raped whilst drunk, and that she knew it was rape because she wouldn't have found the man attractive if she'd been sober.

Nemesis wrote:n Iowa man who was arrested for sexual abuse of an incapacitated woman insisted to police that he couldn’t have committed the crime because the victim was “not even rapable” by his standards.  According to a probable cause document obtained by Headline News, 36-year-old William Francis Miller assaulted the woman in May of 2014 after a night of drinking with friends.

The police report indicated that the group of friends had gone to sleep, and it described the victim as “incapacitated.” That’s when Miller removed the woman’s underwear and began to have sex with her, police said. One of the woman’s friend’s was said to have witnessed the attack and told Miller to stop. Miller admitted to police during an interview that he had intercourse with the victim, but he said that she had consented to the sex. Miller defended himself by saying that, by his own standards, the woman was “not even rapable,” the charging document said.
After being arrested on May 7, Miller was being held at Johnson County Jail in lieu of $26,000 bond. A court appearance is scheduled for May 18.


http://www.rawstory.com/2015/05/iowa-man-insists-he-couldnt-have-sexually-assaulted-sleeping-woman-because-shes-not-even-rapable/

well that's an interesting defence ploy...

heavenlyfatheragain wrote:

Nemesis wrote:n Iowa man who was arrested for sexual abuse of an incapacitated woman insisted to police that he couldn’t have committed the crime because the victim was “not even rapable” by his standards.  According to a probable cause document obtained by Headline News, 36-year-old William Francis Miller assaulted the woman in May of 2014 after a night of drinking with friends.

The police report indicated that the group of friends had gone to sleep, and it described the victim as “incapacitated.” That’s when Miller removed the woman’s underwear and began to have sex with her, police said. One of the woman’s friend’s was said to have witnessed the attack and told Miller to stop. Miller admitted to police during an interview that he had intercourse with the victim, but he said that she had consented to the sex. Miller defended himself by saying that, by his own standards, the woman was “not even rapable,” the charging document said.
After being arrested on May 7, Miller was being held at Johnson County Jail in lieu of $26,000 bond. A court appearance is scheduled for May 18.


http://www.rawstory.com/2015/05/iowa-man-insists-he-couldnt-have-sexually-assaulted-sleeping-woman-because-shes-not-even-rapable/

well that's an interesting defence ploy...

Or one that is going to torn apart for the complete contradiction which it seems you have failed to work out.

Nemesis wrote:

heavenlyfatheragain wrote:

well that's an interesting defence ploy...

Or one that is going to torn apart for the complete contradiction which it seems you have failed to work out.

I saw it ... I must make a point of making my humour either the potty type or for three year olds to understand...

heavenlyfatheragain wrote:

Nemesis wrote:


Or one that is going to torn apart for the complete contradiction which it seems you have failed to work out.

I saw it ... I must make a point of making my humour either the potty type or for three year olds to understand...

I thought you had a sense of humour failure even more so when it came to your own faith.

Nemesis wrote:

heavenlyfatheragain wrote:

I saw it ... I must make a point of making my humour either the potty type or for three year olds to understand...

I thought you had a sense of humour failure even more so when it came to your own faith.

the Lord blessed me with a wonderful sense of humour, that's why i can talk to you...

heavenlyfatheragain wrote:

Nemesis wrote:

I thought you had a sense of humour failure even more so when it came to your own faith.

the Lord blessed me with a wonderful sense of humour, that's why i can talk to you...

Lord Vader?

It would explain agreat deal.