interesting tool to compare nations
3 posters
NewsFix :: Miscellany :: Recreation
Page 1 of 1
interesting tool to compare nations
interesting tool to compare nations
http://www.ifitweremyhome.com/
http://www.ifitweremyhome.com/
veya_victaous- The Mod Loki, Minister of Chaos & Candy, Emperor of the Southern Realms, Captain Kangaroo
- Posts : 19114
Join date : 2013-01-23
Age : 41
Location : Australia
Re: interesting tool to compare nations
That is really cool! I think this site might very well consume hours of my time ...
Re: interesting tool to compare nations
That's really interesting! Quite surprised we use less electric than Australians.
Guest- Guest
Re: interesting tool to compare nations
Probably all that fiddling with the air-conditioning. Or as they say in Australia, "fiddling wazzle the air-con, mate."
Re: interesting tool to compare nations
in 50 years time if the left have their way in the United Kingdom you would...
die 17.1 years sooner
be 11.9 times more likely to die in infancy
be 2.8 times more likely to be unemployed
make 93.03% less money
be 5.5 times more likely to have HIV/AIDS
use 96.86% less electricity
spend 96.86% less money on health care
consume 85.86% less oil
have 2.5 times more babies
die 17.1 years sooner
be 11.9 times more likely to die in infancy
be 2.8 times more likely to be unemployed
make 93.03% less money
be 5.5 times more likely to have HIV/AIDS
use 96.86% less electricity
spend 96.86% less money on health care
consume 85.86% less oil
have 2.5 times more babies
Guest- Guest
Re: interesting tool to compare nations
darknessss wrote:in 50 years time if the left have their way in the United Kingdom you would...
die 17.1 years sooner
be 11.9 times more likely to die in infancy
be 2.8 times more likely to be unemployed
make 93.03% less money
be 5.5 times more likely to have HIV/AIDS
use 96.86% less electricity
spend 96.86% less money on health care
consume 85.86% less oil
have 2.5 times more babies
Or they could follow your way and be 1,000 times more likely to be a git
Re: interesting tool to compare nations
yes true...but at least they would be healthy reasonably well off gits....Ben_Reilly wrote:darknessss wrote:in 50 years time if the left have their way in the United Kingdom you would...
die 17.1 years sooner
be 11.9 times more likely to die in infancy
be 2.8 times more likely to be unemployed
make 93.03% less money
be 5.5 times more likely to have HIV/AIDS
use 96.86% less electricity
spend 96.86% less money on health care
consume 85.86% less oil
have 2.5 times more babies
Or they could follow your way and be 1,000 times more likely to be a git
not the socialist dream of all being nothing but rats.....
Guest- Guest
Re: interesting tool to compare nations
darknessss wrote:yes true...but at least they would be healthy reasonably well off gits....Ben_Reilly wrote:darknessss wrote:in 50 years time if the left have their way in the United Kingdom you would...
die 17.1 years sooner
be 11.9 times more likely to die in infancy
be 2.8 times more likely to be unemployed
make 93.03% less money
be 5.5 times more likely to have HIV/AIDS
use 96.86% less electricity
spend 96.86% less money on health care
consume 85.86% less oil
have 2.5 times more babies
Or they could follow your way and be 1,000 times more likely to be a git
not the socialist dream of all being nothing but rats.....
Would they be deathly boring, too? Probably.
Re: interesting tool to compare nations
so , since you are sooo clever...so you think answer the question I asked....
given that we are struggling to fund our essential services NOW
how do you propose that we find the funding to provide for thousands od potentially illiterate, unskilled, unhealthy
immigrants suddenly dumped on us???
and yes these NEW economic migrants whos only criteria will be that they are "poor" will be exactly that
because thats what the "poor"of these nations are...
sad, and perhaps a tad unfair though it is, that is the simple plain and unarguable truth......
so....
where do we get the money for the UP FRONT costs....
given that we are struggling to fund our essential services NOW
how do you propose that we find the funding to provide for thousands od potentially illiterate, unskilled, unhealthy
immigrants suddenly dumped on us???
and yes these NEW economic migrants whos only criteria will be that they are "poor" will be exactly that
because thats what the "poor"of these nations are...
sad, and perhaps a tad unfair though it is, that is the simple plain and unarguable truth......
so....
where do we get the money for the UP FRONT costs....
Guest- Guest
Re: interesting tool to compare nations
darknessss wrote:so , since you are sooo clever...so you think answer the question I asked....
given that we are struggling to fund our essential services NOW
how do you propose that we find the funding to provide for thousands od potentially illiterate, unskilled, unhealthy
immigrants suddenly dumped on us???
and yes these NEW economic migrants whos only criteria will be that they are "poor" will be exactly that
because thats what the "poor"of these nations are...
sad, and perhaps a tad unfair though it is, that is the simple plain and unarguable truth......
so....
where do we get the money for the UP FRONT costs....
Investors who might be interested in doubling the world's fifth-largest economy? Maybe a little debt? If well-planned, growing the UK population would undoubtedly make it a richer country. You could still hide in the woods, the country would still be 95 percent undeveloped.
Re: interesting tool to compare nations
Ben_Reilly wrote:darknessss wrote:so , since you are sooo clever...so you think answer the question I asked....
given that we are struggling to fund our essential services NOW
how do you propose that we find the funding to provide for thousands od potentially illiterate, unskilled, unhealthy
immigrants suddenly dumped on us???
and yes these NEW economic migrants whos only criteria will be that they are "poor" will be exactly that
because thats what the "poor"of these nations are...
sad, and perhaps a tad unfair though it is, that is the simple plain and unarguable truth......
so....
where do we get the money for the UP FRONT costs....
Investors who might be interested in doubling the world's fifth-largest economy?
yeah right....you and I both know thats as likely as martians landing and as it si we have enogh of those foreign bastards ...look at the thread about moving people out of london due to price increases due to foreign investors
Maybe a little debt?
I think we have enough of that dont you....oooops i forgot....lefties again.....yeah thats right build up debt even more...its great.....
If well-planned,
but thats the point which you seem to have totally missed....we are not talking "well planned...we are talking an E.U edict to take in unknown but huge numbers of economic (actually uneconomic) migrants wich will come with massive up front costs....I DONT call that "well planned"
growing the UK population would undoubtedly make it a richer country. You could still hide in the woods, the country would still be 95 percent undeveloped.
Guest- Guest
Re: interesting tool to compare nations
Victor, considering the Tories have doubled the debt, that's a bit of a silly statement.
Guest- Guest
Re: interesting tool to compare nations
Every first-world nation always carries an amount of debt that seems astronomical to us because we're not countries, we're individuals.
Nobody ever calls it in because the people who work in these things tend not to be stupid about butchering their milk-cow.
Conservatives piss and moan about debt like they have to pay it off personally, but unless you expect your country to collapse soon, nobody cares. It doesn't matter.
Nobody ever calls it in because the people who work in these things tend not to be stupid about butchering their milk-cow.
Conservatives piss and moan about debt like they have to pay it off personally, but unless you expect your country to collapse soon, nobody cares. It doesn't matter.
Re: interesting tool to compare nations
Ben_Reilly wrote:Every first-world nation always carries an amount of debt that seems astronomical to us because we're not countries, we're individuals.
Nobody ever calls it in because the people who work in these things tend not to be stupid about butchering their milk-cow.
no they just up the cost of borrowing by reducing your credit rating.......which then impacts ME....
Conservatives piss and moan about debt like they have to pay it off personally, but unless you expect your country to collapse soon,
dont look now...but............
nobody cares. It doesn't matter.
Guest- Guest
Re: interesting tool to compare nations
darknessss wrote:and you would see it tripled again
Not, the Conservatives would:
Honestly Victor, I don't know what your missus is putting in your porridge but it's making you dead cranky.
Guest- Guest
Re: interesting tool to compare nations
besides this is part of the "price" we are only just seeing from labours mad splurge
where did they think the money was going to come from to suddenly provide all the extra healthcare. schools etc ???
for their imported voters????
immigation is fine.......when controlled.....
where did they think the money was going to come from to suddenly provide all the extra healthcare. schools etc ???
for their imported voters????
immigation is fine.......when controlled.....
Guest- Guest
Re: interesting tool to compare nations
Whereas this lot borrowed more than any Labour Chancellor, in fact EVERY Labour Chancellor, has ever done, and held back recovery:
http://theweek.com/articles/536082/thanks-lot-austerity-could-have-2014s-economic-recovery-2011
Last year boasted the strongest job numbers since 1999, and as a result, many commentators have concluded that left-wing critics of austerity were wrong all along. The basic case — advanced by Jeff Sachs, Scott Sumner, and others — is that the surge in growth and jobs proves that austerity is not the poison its detractors claimed it would be.
These commentators make some good points. But they are wrong about austerity. A close examination of the counterfactuals shows that austerity almost certainly held back the recovery — and without it, we might have had 2014's strong numbers in 2011.
http://theweek.com/articles/536082/thanks-lot-austerity-could-have-2014s-economic-recovery-2011
Last year boasted the strongest job numbers since 1999, and as a result, many commentators have concluded that left-wing critics of austerity were wrong all along. The basic case — advanced by Jeff Sachs, Scott Sumner, and others — is that the surge in growth and jobs proves that austerity is not the poison its detractors claimed it would be.
These commentators make some good points. But they are wrong about austerity. A close examination of the counterfactuals shows that austerity almost certainly held back the recovery — and without it, we might have had 2014's strong numbers in 2011.
Guest- Guest
Re: interesting tool to compare nations
All this tells me is that it would be better to live in Australia
But then, they rule their country better.
But then, they rule their country better.
eddie- King of Beards. Keeper of the Whip. Top Chef. BEES!!!!!! Mushroom muncher. Spider aficionado!
- Posts : 43129
Join date : 2013-07-28
Age : 25
Location : England
Similar topics
» Two former Mexican presidents compare Donald Trump to Hitler
» Republican Randy Weber Uses Paris Massacre As Opportunity To Compare Obama With Hitler
» ToTok is a spying tool
» When homophobia becomes a tool for political persecution
» Chrome to become Malware Collection tool.
» Republican Randy Weber Uses Paris Massacre As Opportunity To Compare Obama With Hitler
» ToTok is a spying tool
» When homophobia becomes a tool for political persecution
» Chrome to become Malware Collection tool.
NewsFix :: Miscellany :: Recreation
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Sat Mar 18, 2023 12:28 pm by Ben Reilly
» TOTAL MADNESS Great British Railway Journeys among shows flagged by counter terror scheme ‘for encouraging far-right sympathies
Wed Feb 22, 2023 5:14 pm by Tommy Monk
» Interesting COVID figures
Tue Feb 21, 2023 5:00 am by Tommy Monk
» HAPPY CHRISTMAS.
Sun Jan 01, 2023 7:33 pm by Tommy Monk
» The Fight Over Climate Change is Over (The Greenies Won!)
Thu Dec 15, 2022 3:59 pm by Tommy Monk
» Trump supporter murders wife, kills family dog, shoots daughter
Mon Dec 12, 2022 1:21 am by 'Wolfie
» Quill
Thu Oct 20, 2022 10:28 pm by Tommy Monk
» Algerian Woman under investigation for torture and murder of French girl, 12, whose body was found in plastic case in Paris
Thu Oct 20, 2022 10:04 pm by Tommy Monk
» Wind turbines cool down the Earth (edited with better video link)
Sun Oct 16, 2022 9:19 am by Ben Reilly
» Saying goodbye to our Queen.
Sun Sep 25, 2022 9:02 pm by Maddog
» PHEW.
Sat Sep 17, 2022 6:33 pm by Syl
» And here's some more enrichment...
Thu Sep 15, 2022 3:46 pm by Ben Reilly
» John F Kennedy Assassination
Thu Sep 15, 2022 3:40 pm by Ben Reilly
» Where is everyone lately...?
Thu Sep 15, 2022 3:33 pm by Ben Reilly
» London violence over the weekend...
Mon Sep 05, 2022 2:19 pm by Tommy Monk
» Why should anyone believe anything that Mo Farah says...!?
Wed Jul 13, 2022 1:44 am by Tommy Monk
» Liverpool Labour defends mayor role poll after turnout was only 3% and they say they will push ahead with the option that was least preferred!!!
Mon Jul 11, 2022 1:11 pm by Tommy Monk
» Labour leader Keir Stammer can't answer the simple question of whether a woman has a penis or not...
Mon Jul 11, 2022 3:58 am by Tommy Monk
» More evidence of remoaners still trying to overturn Brexit... and this is a conservative MP who should be drummed out of the party and out of parliament!
Sun Jul 10, 2022 10:50 pm by Tommy Monk
» R Kelly 30 years, Ghislaine Maxwell 20 years... but here in UK...
Fri Jul 08, 2022 5:31 pm by Original Quill