Society in a Nutshell

I don't always agree with this gentleman but I agree with every sentiment in this video.It's only two minutes long so please watch it.

I agree, but that blokes voice was so annoying  ::fishffight:: 

Love you avi, you are very pretty  ::cheerlead:: 

I agree to a degree...

But being an Australian quite a number of those complaint don't apply.     

Bramble wrote:I agree, but that blokes voice was so annoying  ::fishffight:: 

Love you avi, you are very pretty  ::cheerlead:: 

Thankyou Bramble you are very kind.  

Yes I agree he can be most annoying,i watch his video's alot and he can be quite patronising too.

veya_victaous wrote:I agree to a degree...

But being an Australian quite a number of those complaint don't apply.     

No one like's a smug so and so Veya lol

We can't all be lucky enough to live in Australia. ::ftlcheer:: ::ftlcheer:: 

Wish I was Australian, I'd find Lone Wolf and ask him why he's such an arse. [Just my opinion].

FluffyBunny wrote:

veya_victaous wrote:
I agree to a degree...

But being an Australian quite a number of those complaint don't apply.    

No one like's a smug so and so Veya lol

We can't all be lucky enough to live in Australia. ::ftlcheer:: ::ftlcheer:: 

  

I can be so lucky !

Lucky, lucky, lucky...

 

FluffyBunny wrote:

veya_victaous wrote:I agree to a degree...

But being an Australian quite a number of those complaint don't apply.     

No one like's a smug so and so Veya lol

We can't all be lucky enough to live in Australia. ::ftlcheer:: ::ftlcheer:: 

it is just some of his specific points on unemployment and and recession didn't apply here....

You see what our gov't did Instead of giving millions to a few CEOs that had already lost billions and caused the mess in the first place, was give everyone $1000. and it worked because top down economics is rubbish, a rich person doesn't need to spend all/most of the money to live so they save it and the economy shrinks. Poorer and even middle class people do spend most money they get on living, so if you insert the money into the bottom it ends up feeding the top too.

Basically Australia sort of proves that giving welfare to people, not corporations, has a more positive effect on stabilising the economy. Bottom up economics is actually the correct theory, the exact opposite of that practised in the USA.

giving money to companies is pointless because they wont employ people if they are not selling product/service and they cant sell product/service if the people have no money. therefore give money to the people Preferably lower down the economic scale as they will spend it on products/services and keep the companies going and the companies will keep employing people.