Golden Gate Bridge Suicide Net Plan Gets Boost

Didge wrote:

Sassy wrote:Recommendation
It is recommended that the Board of Directors amend the Bridge Division Capital Budget to include the Construction of the Golden Gate Bridge Physical Suicide Deterrent System Project (Project) in the amount of $76,000,000, with the nderstanding that the Project will be funded with $22,000,000 of federal Local Highway Bridge Program (HBP) funds programmed by Caltrans, $27,000,000 of federal Surface Transportation Program (STP) funds programmed by the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC), $7,000,000 of California Mental Health Service Act Funds (Proposition 63), and $20,000,000 from District Reserves.


Thank goodness for that.   Guess Quill didn't get his copy  

Explain Irn how that is not goading?

Irn Bru wrote:

Didge wrote:


Explain Irn how that is not goading?

He may have seen it as goading. After all he's been doing that himself long before this came up. It's more informative if nothing else of something he should have known about even suggesting in his previous post that he knew more about it. And why did he feel the need to drag others into it? - the reason why it has widened into the type of thread that we have now.

And besides, the Board of Directors meeting is taking place right now so we may get the decision quite soon.

I'll let you know the result if I hear anything.

Didge wrote:

Sassy wrote:Recommendation
It is recommended that the Board of Directors amend the Bridge Division Capital Budget to include the Construction of the Golden Gate Bridge Physical Suicide Deterrent System Project (Project) in the amount of $76,000,000, with the nderstanding that the Project will be funded with $22,000,000 of federal Local Highway Bridge Program (HBP) funds programmed by Caltrans, $27,000,000 of federal Surface Transportation Program (STP) funds programmed by the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC), $7,000,000 of California Mental Health Service Act Funds (Proposition 63), and $20,000,000 from District Reserves.


Thank goodness for that.   Guess Quill didn't get his copy  

Explain Irn how that is not goading?

Joy Division wrote:Fcuk sake Didge..I can't believe what I'm hearing,,,

Are you pretending to be right or do you really think you are right?


Quill has mentioned me and others who were not even part of this and referred to us as sassy posse!
C&P is allowed Didge, so long as it's from a credible source, an argument can be our forward by C&P !!

Didge wrote:

Joy Division wrote:Fcuk sake Didge..I can't believe what I'm hearing,,,

Are you pretending to be right or do you really think you are right?


Quill has mentioned me and others who were not even part of this and referred to us as sassy posse!
C&P is allowed Didge, so long as it's from a credible source, an argument can be our forward by C&P !!

Oh do pipe down, I stated you had no involvement.

Yes C&P is allowed, I am pointing out she does this every other post and is not debating.

Sorry you are boring the fuck out of me.

Sassy wrote:

Didge wrote:


Explain Irn how that is not goading?

Quill has stated openly and on more than one occasion that he is a Director of the GG Bridge.   He posted that the GG Bridge would not be doing it, and they never had to worry about money, yet the Agenda was all about funding and sorting out the finances, and stated that they had already agreed to it in principle if the funding could be found.   Therefore, it seemed very odd that someone who has claimed over and over again that he is a Director of it, was saying the exact opposite to what was on the Agenda.   Therefore, he couldn't have received his copy.   Either that, or he's a liar.   I know which one I believe, and so do plenty of others.   Now, I'm quite sure Quill will wish you hadn't brought that up again, as he has done his level best to divert from those facts.

Sassy wrote:

Didge wrote:


Oh do pipe down, I stated you had no involvement.

Yes C&P is allowed, I am pointing out she does this every other post and is not debating.

Sorry you are boring the fuck out of me.

Well, it's about time someone bored you, you do it to us enough.

Didge wrote:

Joy Division wrote:Fcuk sake Didge..I can't believe what I'm hearing,,,

Are you pretending to be right or do you really think you are right?


Quill has mentioned me and others who were not even part of this and referred to us as sassy posse!
C&P is allowed Didge, so long as it's from a credible source, an argument can be our forward by C&P !!

Oh do pipe down, I stated you had no involvement.

Yes C&P is allowed, I am pointing out she does this every other post and is not debating.

Sorry you are boring the fuck out of me.

Joy Division wrote:

Didge wrote:


Oh do pipe down, I stated you had no involvement.

Yes C&P is allowed, I am pointing out she does this every other post and is not debating.

Sorry you are boring the fuck out of me.

  

OMG!

Your making an absolute twit of yourself Didge, and your lying and choosing not to open your eyes...

Open them laddie.

Didge wrote:

Irn Bru wrote:

Didge wrote:


Explain Irn how that is not goading?

He may have seen it as goading. After all he's been doing that himself long before this came up. It's more informative if nothing else of something he should have known about even suggesting in his previous post that he knew more about it. And why did he feel the need to drag others into it? - the reason why it has widened into the type of thread that we have now.

And besides, the Board of Directors meeting is taking place right now so we may get the decision quite soon.

I'll let you know the result if I hear anything.

For fuck sake, you are making the worst excuses, he had posted after Nems, nothing to sassy, then sassy later posts and makes that comment about Quill, that is goading and anyone can see that. Now you advocate as a reason for her to goad, which is clearly what you are admitting to now eluding to if he has done so before himself as an excuse for her to do so.

Thanks for your admission, because why bring up past threads unless you are admitting she is goading.

Thus clearly this thread was started with intent to get at Quill an that to me is utterly pathetic!


As to the result, only time will tell if they made the right decision, and again the only way to me it will be right is to help people stop having accidents and people suffering the trauma of experience. As stated, now there willno no human intervention, the one success story from the bridge with attempts

Didge wrote:

Sassy wrote:

Quill has stated openly and on more than one occasion that he is a Director of the GG Bridge.   He posted that the GG Bridge would not be doing it, and they never had to worry about money, yet the Agenda was all about funding and sorting out the finances, and stated that they had already agreed to it in principle if the funding could be found.   Therefore, it seemed very odd that someone who has claimed over and over again that he is a Director of it, was saying the exact opposite to what was on the Agenda.   Therefore, he couldn't have received his copy.   Either that, or he's a liar.   I know which one I believe, and so do plenty of others.   Now, I'm quite sure Quill will wish you hadn't brought that up again, as he has done his level best to divert from those facts.

So you admit this had nothing to do with suicides but you started this because of claims he made before then.
Even now you expose how this is about you trying to expose him as a liar, seriously, do you not see that you are actually exposing yourself that you tried to set him up an even there failed?

Thanks for your admission, as we all had already perceived!

Sassy wrote:

Didge wrote:


So you admit this had nothing to do with suicides but you started this because of claims he made before then.
Even now you expose how this is about you trying to expose him as a liar, seriously, do you not see that you are actually exposing yourself that you tried to set him up an even there failed?

Thanks for your admission, as we all had already perceived!

Yet again you are trying to find something that is not there.   I posted about the bridge and the fact that the net would be a good idea.   Lovey and Nems agreed.   Quill then jumped in and rubbished the whole thing and said it would never happen.   Irn found the Agenda showing it would, it therefore seemed strange that a so called Director wouldn't know that.   If Quill had not rubbished the scheme, pretended he knew it would never happen and pretended that he knew the GG Bridge didn't need funding, we would have carried on quite happily.   Quill rubbished it and was shown to be lying, that not my problem, that's Quill's problem for being a lying deceitful scumbag.

Didge wrote:

Sassy wrote:

Yet again you are trying to find something that is not there.   I posted about the bridge and the fact that the net would be a good idea.   Lovey and Nems agreed.   Quill then jumped in and rubbished the whole thing and said it would never happen.   Irn found the Agenda showing it would, it therefore seemed strange that a so called Director wouldn't know that.   If Quill had not rubbished the scheme, pretended he knew it would never happen and pretended that he knew the GG Bridge didn't need funding, we would have carried on quite happily.   Quill rubbished it and was shown to be lying, that not my problem, that's Quill's problem for being a lying deceitful scumbag.

No you admitted that to you what he claimed did not make sense, thus you believed he was lying, why claim this and then state this as your defense?
That exposes your claim, this had nothing to do with suicides but some childish lame attempt to try and expose Quill, where you have been found out before trying to find out his personal details, that is also very pathetic and low.
Sorry but you have once again exposed yourself and clearly shown your intent was to try and goad Quill and poorly try to expose him as a liar, that is showing that you hold also pathetic grudges.

You need to grow up and move on!

Irn Bru wrote:

Didge wrote:


For fuck sake, you are making the worst excuses, he had posted after Nems, nothing to sassy, then sassy later posts and makes that comment about Quill, that is goading and anyone can see that. Now you advocate as a reason for her to goad, which is clearly what you are admitting to now eluding to if he has done so before himself as an excuse for her to do so.

Thanks for your admission, because why bring up past threads unless you are admitting she is goading.

Thus clearly this thread was started with intent to get at Quill an that to me is utterly pathetic!


As to the result, only time will tell if they made the right decision, and again the only way to me it will be right is to help people stop having accidents and people suffering the trauma of experience. As stated, now there willno no human intervention, the one success story from the bridge with attempts

Behave yourself Didge. Quill has been dismissing anyone who has offered up an opinion on the Golden Gate Bridge that is not in like with what he says and he makes them out to be nothing more than a no-mark who's value to the contribution is meaningless. It's been a never ending tirade of goading from him and he just got angry and very abusive and tried to bring in people to support his view that he's being picked on. It's ridiculous and you know and you just got caught up in his silly Sassy posse routine.

Sassy wrote:

Didge wrote:


No you admitted that to you what he claimed did not make sense, thus you believed he was lying, why claim this and then state this as your defense?
That exposes your claim, this had nothing to do with suicides but some childish lame attempt to try and expose Quill, where you have been found out before trying to find out his personal details, that is also very pathetic and low.
Sorry but you have once again exposed yourself and clearly shown your intent was to try and goad Quill and poorly try to expose him as a liar, that is showing that you hold also pathetic grudges.

You need to grow up and move on!

You're nuts.   The Agenda said the exact opposite to what he was saying, he's supposed to be a Director and we're not supposed to question that in those circumstances.   On yer bike son, thank god you're not a policeman.

Didge wrote:

Irn Bru wrote:

Didge wrote:


For fuck sake, you are making the worst excuses, he had posted after Nems, nothing to sassy, then sassy later posts and makes that comment about Quill, that is goading and anyone can see that. Now you advocate as a reason for her to goad, which is clearly what you are admitting to now eluding to if he has done so before himself as an excuse for her to do so.

Thanks for your admission, because why bring up past threads unless you are admitting she is goading.

Thus clearly this thread was started with intent to get at Quill an that to me is utterly pathetic!


As to the result, only time will tell if they made the right decision, and again the only way to me it will be right is to help people stop having accidents and people suffering the trauma of experience. As stated, now there willno no human intervention, the one success story from the bridge with attempts

Behave yourself Didge. Quill has been dismissing anyone who has offered up an opinion on the Golden Gate Bridge that is not in like with what he says and he makes them out to be nothing more than a no-mark who's value to the contribution is meaningless. It's been a never ending tirade of goading from him and he just got angry and very abusive and tried to bring in people to support his view that he's being picked on. It's ridiculous and you know and you just got caught up in his silly Sassy posse routine.

Score, you are asking me to behave when sassy has exposed herself an her intent on this an even now you advocate he is also lying proving also you are involved, seriously, do any of you even contemplate what you what you post without realising you expose your real intent?
I really could care less what your view of him is on this topic, what is clear is that the intent was to try to expose him as a liar, seriously, how old are you?

Facts are fact, the goading started with sassy as pointed out and no doubt this was planned from the start as seen

Sassy wrote:

Irn Bru wrote:

Didge wrote:


Score, you are asking me to behave when sassy has exposed herself an her intent on this an even now you advocate he is also lying proving also you are involved, seriously, do any of you even contemplate what you what you post without realising you expose your real intent?
I really could care less what your view of him is on this topic, what is clear is that the intent was to try to expose him as a liar, seriously, how old are you?

Facts are fact, the goading started with sassy as pointed out and no doubt this was planned from the start as seen

Sorry Didge but that's rubbish. This thread could only have ended up the way it did because Quill made it this way. He didn't have to get angry and he didn't need to be abusive but he chose to do that just because he was made aware that the Board of Directors were set to approve the plan.
He's a clever guy Quill but he shouldn't have brought others into it and widen the debate into other areas that it didn't need to.


Anyway, this current trend of the debate is taking us nowhere so until I see evidence from these experts that you know about that say the barrier will not save lives because it will lead to an increase elsewhere then I'll leave it at that.

And as I say - we may well hear the result soon and I hope it's approved.

Sassy wrote:

Irn Bru wrote:BREAKING NEWS

The board have approved the plan.

    

Didge wrote:

Irn Bru wrote:

Didge wrote:


Score, you are asking me to behave when sassy has exposed herself an her intent on this an even now you advocate he is also lying proving also you are involved, seriously, do any of you even contemplate what you what you post without realising you expose your real intent?
I really could care less what your view of him is on this topic, what is clear is that the intent was to try to expose him as a liar, seriously, how old are you?

Facts are fact, the goading started with sassy as pointed out and no doubt this was planned from the start as seen

Sorry Didge but that's rubbish. This thread could only have ended up the way it did because Quill made it this way. He didn't have to get angry and he didn't need to be abusive but he chose to do that just because he was made aware that the Board of Directors were set to approve the plan.
He's a clever guy Quill but he shouldn't have brought others into it and widen the debate into other areas that it didn't need to.


Anyway, this current trend of the debate is taking us nowhere so until I see evidence from these experts that you know about that say the barrier will not save lives because it will lead to an increase elsewhere then I'll leave it at that.

And as I say - we may well hear the result soon and I hope it's approved.

No its not rubbish as has been explained Irn, I suggest you bow out while the going is good, sassy has clearly exposed this thread had everything to do with some poor lame vendetta an even now you go on about Quill, where again this shows you thus before this thread was started id not believe him.

I am still waiting for you to counter my points and I am sure the barrier as stated will help prevent those falling through accidents, but my points has always been on those contemplating suicide, of which the success story here was human intervention


Lt me know when you want to take on these views and not rely on others

Sassy wrote:

Irn Bru wrote:

Didge wrote:


No its not rubbish as has been explained Irn, I suggest you bow out while the going is good, sassy has clearly exposed this thread had everything to do with some poor lame vendetta an even now you go on about Quill, where again this shows you thus before this thread was started id not believe him.

I am still waiting for you to counter my points and I am sure the barrier as stated will help prevent those falling through accidents, but my points has always been on those contemplating suicide, of which the success story here was human intervention


Lt me know when you want to take on these views and not rely on others

Sorry Didge. I have answered your points and it's up to you now to provide the evidence from these experts that you know about that contradicts the evidenhce already presented to you.

The board have approved the plan and it's now your move.

Joy Division wrote:

Sassy wrote:

 ::smthg:: 

That's a cracker.

Sassy wrote:You are?   Charcoal is the nearest you are to on fire.

Didge wrote:

Joy Division wrote:



 ::smthg:: 

That's a cracker.

Irony at its best, clearly I have inspired you on posts with my views against discrimination, so do you fall into this category?


lol I am on fire tonight!


I'm not laughing at you Didge, I just thought the pic Sass uploaded was funny!

Joy Division wrote:

Didge wrote:


Irony at its best, clearly I have inspired you on posts with my views against discrimination, so do you fall into this category?


lol I am on fire tonight!

I'm not laughing at you Didge, I just thought the pic Sass uploaded was funny!

Didge wrote:

Sassy wrote:You are?   Charcoal is the nearest you are to on fire.

Excellent so you think I am diamond.


Thanks again

Didge wrote:

Joy Division wrote:
I'm not laughing at you Didge, I just thought the pic Sass uploaded was funny!

It was funny even more so when you responded to it mate!

Joy Division wrote:

Didge wrote:

It was funny even more so when you responded to it mate!

Didge, your looking too much into things mate, honest

Didge wrote:

Joy Division wrote:


Didge, your looking too much into things mate, honest

Good thing I do Joy as seen!

Sassy wrote:

Didge wrote:

Excellent so you think I am diamond.


Thanks again

No Charcoal, you know, the black stuff that crumbles and breaks, not diamond, that has to be compressed under great force for years.   Come to think of it, that wouldn't be a bad idea.

Didge wrote:

Sassy wrote:

No Charcoal, you know, the black stuff that crumbles and breaks, not diamond, that has to be compressed under great force for years.   Come to think of it, that wouldn't be a bad idea.

You are just not as clever as seen or as witty as I where now so badly have I humiliated you that you wish pain onto me, it proves that I have.

So thanks again

Sassy wrote:Yea, trouble is what you look at is wrong Didge, and just gets worse.   Never mind, the net is going to be done and who gives a toss what Didge thinks.

Sassy wrote:

Didge wrote:


You are just not as clever as seen or as witty as I where now so badly have I humiliated you that you wish pain onto me, it proves that I have.

So thanks again

You actually believe that don't you?   That's soooooo sad.   Bless you Didge, one of these days you'll get help.

Sassy wrote:Yes Didge, I've always thought you must humour the afflicted so I'll agree, should hate to upset someone in such a poor state.