Nigel Farage appears to U-turn again on same-sex marriage
Page 1 of 1
Nigel Farage appears to U-turn again on same-sex marriage
UKIP seemed to have found itself in a bit of a pickle this week, as an apparent breakdown in internal communication led to seemingly unapproved words from Nigel Farage being sent out to the media.
Mr Farage appeared to U-turn again on same-sex marriage, as he has denied that answers to a PinkNews Q&A attributed to him by an official UKIP spokesman were actually his words.
Among Mr Farage’s apparent responses to a readers’ Q&A sent to PinkNews by Mr Farage’s official spokesperson yesterday, was the assertion that he would not campaign to abolish same-sex marriages, and that he would seek the augmentation of civil marriage and civil partnerships, with religious ceremonies as optional.
The answers sent to PinkNews appeared to show that Mr Farage had stating that the party was reviewing all of its policies including its previously stated opposition to same-sex marriage.
In a statement on the UKIP website today, Mr Farage said: “The statement attributed to me yesterday was not made by me and not approved by me. It was a draft by a staff member that should never have been sent out.
On the release of the answers to the mainstream media, a spokesperson was also contacted directly by the Press Association and asked to confirm details and send full quotes, which they did.
The spokesperson today told PinkNews that the answers to the Q&A were completed by the UKIP press office, and that it had been assumed that Mr Farage had cleared them for release, which the UKIP leader now denies.
PinkNews founder Benjamin Cohen said: ”Nigel Farage’s answers to PinkNews reader questions were provided to us by his official spokesperson. The responses were even sent by this spokesperson to external media who requested it after PinkNews first published the feature. I note though that in his statement today, Mr Farage does not comment on whether he will be campaigning to take away the marriages of gay couples at the next election.”
In today’s statement on the party’s website, Mr Farage continued: “UKIP’s objection to same sex marriage was two-fold. First, we did not think it should have been made a political priority at a time of many other pressing issues and pointed out that the measure had no mandate from the electorate.
“Secondly we were concerned that because of the role of the European Court of Human Rights in British law that faith communities which had strong objections were at risk of being forced to conduct gay marriages.
“There is an ongoing debate within UKIP about how we can protect faith communities from ultimately being compelled to conduct same sex marriages against their beliefs and their will. We note that some gay rights activists are already talking about taking legal action in Strasbourg to force this issue.”
Some have questioned why this sudden change of position came the day before the budget was to be announced, asking whether it was a tactic to avoid media attention.
Sceptical politicians from the Conservative Party and Lib Dems yesterday may have been proven right in questioning the motives of the Q&A answers attributed to Mr Farage, as Tory vice chair Michael Fabricant, Tory MP Mike Freer and Lib Dem peer all questioned the motives behind the answers.
http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2014/03/19/nigel-farage-appears-to-u-turn-again-on-same-sex-marriage/
.....Oh dear.
Guest- Guest
Re: Nigel Farage appears to U-turn again on same-sex marriage
There's already a thread about this - started by you.
Raggamuffin- Forum Detective ????♀️
- Posts : 33746
Join date : 2014-02-10
Re: Nigel Farage appears to U-turn again on same-sex marriage
Raggamuffin wrote:There's already a thread about this - started by you.
This is an update, he U turned again, learn to read you stupid woman.
Guest- Guest
Re: Nigel Farage appears to U-turn again on same-sex marriage
Catman wrote:Raggamuffin wrote:There's already a thread about this - started by you.
This is an update, he U turned again, learn to read you stupid woman.
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
Who cares?
Raggamuffin- Forum Detective ????♀️
- Posts : 33746
Join date : 2014-02-10
Re: Nigel Farage appears to U-turn again on same-sex marriage
Raggamuffin wrote:Catman wrote:
This is an update, he U turned again, learn to read you stupid woman.
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
Who cares?
If the news story doesn't interest you, then you don't have to click on the link!
When will you ever learn that you don't run the show here!
Guest- Guest
UKIP Wales adds to gay marriage confusion with statement claiming ‘marriage is for procreation’
UKIP Wales added to the confusion over the party’s policy regarding same-sex marriage, by saying it agreed with a policy opposing it, but gave totally different reasons to explain its opposition.
In an apparent breakdown in internal communication this week, PinkNews received andswers to a readers’ Q&A confirmed by an official spokesman to have been approved by Nigel Farage which stated that the party was reviewing all of its policies including its previously stated opposition to same-sex marriage.
One day later, Mr Farage released a statement reiterating the party’s opposition to same-sex marriage, saying: “UKIP’s objection to same sex marriage was two-fold. First, we did not think it should have been made a political priority at a time of many other pressing issues and pointed out that the measure had no mandate from the electorate.
“Secondly we were concerned that because of the role of the European Court of Human Rights in British law that faith communities which had strong objections were at risk of being forced to conduct gay marriages.”
In response, UKIP Wales appeared to get its wires crossed, as it re-published Mr Farage’s statement on its own website, along with the claim that the policy was based on moral purposes, rather than for legal reasons. The statement also made a disproven claim that children of opposite-sex parents do better than those of same-sex couples.
In one version of the page, posted originally on LeftFootForward the statement said: “UKIP Wales wholeheartedly supports the UKIP policy regarding same sex marriage, that it is not the right of government to define marriage, and that marriage is between a man and a woman for the procreation of children, and to provide a balanced and stable environment for those children.”
In another, it read: “Warwick Nicholson, Chairman of UKIP Wales, reiterated our policy, that: ‘No government has the right to redifine marriage. Marriage is constituted for the union of man and woman, for the procreation of children, and remains the most stable way for children to be raised, and should be supported and protected by government.’”
Sceptical politicians from the Conservative Party and Lib Dems on Tuesday may have been proven right in questioning the motives of the Q&A answers attributed to Mr Farage, as Tory vice chair Michael Fabricant, Tory MP Mike Freer and Lib Dem peer all asked what were the motives behind the answers.
http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2014/03/20/ukip-wales-adds-gay-marriage-confusion/
In an apparent breakdown in internal communication this week, PinkNews received andswers to a readers’ Q&A confirmed by an official spokesman to have been approved by Nigel Farage which stated that the party was reviewing all of its policies including its previously stated opposition to same-sex marriage.
One day later, Mr Farage released a statement reiterating the party’s opposition to same-sex marriage, saying: “UKIP’s objection to same sex marriage was two-fold. First, we did not think it should have been made a political priority at a time of many other pressing issues and pointed out that the measure had no mandate from the electorate.
“Secondly we were concerned that because of the role of the European Court of Human Rights in British law that faith communities which had strong objections were at risk of being forced to conduct gay marriages.”
In response, UKIP Wales appeared to get its wires crossed, as it re-published Mr Farage’s statement on its own website, along with the claim that the policy was based on moral purposes, rather than for legal reasons. The statement also made a disproven claim that children of opposite-sex parents do better than those of same-sex couples.
In one version of the page, posted originally on LeftFootForward the statement said: “UKIP Wales wholeheartedly supports the UKIP policy regarding same sex marriage, that it is not the right of government to define marriage, and that marriage is between a man and a woman for the procreation of children, and to provide a balanced and stable environment for those children.”
In another, it read: “Warwick Nicholson, Chairman of UKIP Wales, reiterated our policy, that: ‘No government has the right to redifine marriage. Marriage is constituted for the union of man and woman, for the procreation of children, and remains the most stable way for children to be raised, and should be supported and protected by government.’”
Sceptical politicians from the Conservative Party and Lib Dems on Tuesday may have been proven right in questioning the motives of the Q&A answers attributed to Mr Farage, as Tory vice chair Michael Fabricant, Tory MP Mike Freer and Lib Dem peer all asked what were the motives behind the answers.
http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2014/03/20/ukip-wales-adds-gay-marriage-confusion/
Guest- Guest
Similar topics
» Nigel Farage Appears On Have I got News For You, Is Promptly Torn To Shreds
» Nigel Farage: Equal marriage means ‘opening up a very big can of worms’
» Comment: Tomorrow’s equal marriage vote will be a milestone moment in Scottish history
» Nigel Farage and the BBC TV debate
» BBC trying to fling sh*t at nigel farage
» Nigel Farage: Equal marriage means ‘opening up a very big can of worms’
» Comment: Tomorrow’s equal marriage vote will be a milestone moment in Scottish history
» Nigel Farage and the BBC TV debate
» BBC trying to fling sh*t at nigel farage
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Sat Mar 18, 2023 12:28 pm by Ben Reilly
» TOTAL MADNESS Great British Railway Journeys among shows flagged by counter terror scheme ‘for encouraging far-right sympathies
Wed Feb 22, 2023 5:14 pm by Tommy Monk
» Interesting COVID figures
Tue Feb 21, 2023 5:00 am by Tommy Monk
» HAPPY CHRISTMAS.
Sun Jan 01, 2023 7:33 pm by Tommy Monk
» The Fight Over Climate Change is Over (The Greenies Won!)
Thu Dec 15, 2022 3:59 pm by Tommy Monk
» Trump supporter murders wife, kills family dog, shoots daughter
Mon Dec 12, 2022 1:21 am by 'Wolfie
» Quill
Thu Oct 20, 2022 10:28 pm by Tommy Monk
» Algerian Woman under investigation for torture and murder of French girl, 12, whose body was found in plastic case in Paris
Thu Oct 20, 2022 10:04 pm by Tommy Monk
» Wind turbines cool down the Earth (edited with better video link)
Sun Oct 16, 2022 9:19 am by Ben Reilly
» Saying goodbye to our Queen.
Sun Sep 25, 2022 9:02 pm by Maddog
» PHEW.
Sat Sep 17, 2022 6:33 pm by Syl
» And here's some more enrichment...
Thu Sep 15, 2022 3:46 pm by Ben Reilly
» John F Kennedy Assassination
Thu Sep 15, 2022 3:40 pm by Ben Reilly
» Where is everyone lately...?
Thu Sep 15, 2022 3:33 pm by Ben Reilly
» London violence over the weekend...
Mon Sep 05, 2022 2:19 pm by Tommy Monk
» Why should anyone believe anything that Mo Farah says...!?
Wed Jul 13, 2022 1:44 am by Tommy Monk
» Liverpool Labour defends mayor role poll after turnout was only 3% and they say they will push ahead with the option that was least preferred!!!
Mon Jul 11, 2022 1:11 pm by Tommy Monk
» Labour leader Keir Stammer can't answer the simple question of whether a woman has a penis or not...
Mon Jul 11, 2022 3:58 am by Tommy Monk
» More evidence of remoaners still trying to overturn Brexit... and this is a conservative MP who should be drummed out of the party and out of parliament!
Sun Jul 10, 2022 10:50 pm by Tommy Monk
» R Kelly 30 years, Ghislaine Maxwell 20 years... but here in UK...
Fri Jul 08, 2022 5:31 pm by Original Quill