Labour get another drubbing!!!

And the anti white British numpties can't understand why so many white British people are refusing to vote for them...

Tommy Monk wrote:

And the anti white British numpties can't understand why so many white British people are refusing to vote for them...

I'm glad to see you admitting, tommy, that the UK has a racial problem.

Hartlepool voters yet again justifying the term 'Thick norther bastards'.
They are a subspecies of human, devoid of intellect.

Tommy Monk wrote:




And the anti white British numpties can't understand why so many white British people are refusing to vote for them...

What politicians forget is that there's a silent majority. A lot of labour voters just despise what's on offer regarding leadership. Same with the Tories. Sadly our politicians are mostly spineless self serving idiots.

Andy wrote:Hartlepool voters yet again justifying the term 'Thick norther bastards'.
They are a subspecies of human, devoid of intellect.

It's exactly that sort of attitude that is part of labours problem...


But numpties like you will never understand because you are so self righteous in your belief that you are the superiors of everyone else...

Andy wrote:Hartlepool voters yet again justifying the term 'Thick norther bastards'.
They are a subspecies of human, devoid of intellect.

That attitude is hardly going to win favour.

The love Johnson and his lying, cheating, law breaking pack have from many IS baffling though.

I blame a few things: crediting the govt with the success of vaccination - had we voted this time last year, the result would be different. Also the fact the entire news media treats the two parties very differently, with Labour grilled and the Tories given an easy time by all but GMB it seems.

But, it cannot be ignored that Kier Starmer is as dull as dishwater, and his shadow cabinet do nothing but oppose the Tories (even on good things they’ve done). Labour need to reevaluate their approach, because so far it looks disastrous.

At the same time, with the entire media against them, it is a near impossible task.

Original Quill wrote:

Tommy Monk wrote:

And the anti white British numpties can't understand why so many white British people are refusing to vote for them...

I'm glad to see you admitting, tommy, that the UK has a racial problem.

We have had a problem with mass immigration of 3rd world scum bags since 1997 and with open door to EU nationals.

Tommy Monk wrote:

Original Quill wrote:

I'm glad to see you admitting, tommy, that the UK has a racial problem.

We have had a problem with mass immigration of 3rd world scum bags since 1997 and with open door to EU nationals.

Why don't you close the country, shut down all airports and seaports, and accept no telephone calls? Make sure you have enough whiskey.

Nobody voted for the mass immigration of 3rd world scum bags.

Tommy Monk wrote:Nobody voted for the mass immigration of 3rd world scum bags.

I beg to differ, sir.  Who first opened the channel, and enriched themselves through exploitation of the riches of those "scum bags"?  Some would say you willingly took that "vote", and only regret it when you have to pay the quid-pro-quo.

Now you claim that doing the same thing in reverse, is a bad deal?  Well...shame, shame on you.  

Andy wrote:Hartlepool voters yet again justifying the term 'Thick norther bastards'.
They are a subspecies of human, devoid of intellect.

That's how you win elections. Call people a subspecies of human.

But you're missing an important part of the plan Herr Andy. You have to put the subspecies in camps and kill them, so they can't vote for the opposition.

Tommy Monk wrote:


Nobody voted for the mass immigration of 3rd world scum bags.

Who are these “3rd world scumbags” you refer to?
Please explain.

I'd like to know how/why the Labour Party are "anti-white." I've never actually heard that accusation before.

eddie wrote:

Tommy Monk wrote:


Nobody voted for the mass immigration of 3rd world scum bags.

Who are these “3rd world scumbags” you refer to?
Please explain.

Probably Texans.

Maddog wrote:

eddie wrote:

Tommy Monk wrote:


Nobody voted for the mass immigration of 3rd world scum bags.

Who are these “3rd world scumbags” you refer to?
Please explain.

Probably Texans.

People over here never treat Americans like immigrants, and a lot of them get a funny look when I point out that I'm an immigrant.

Then I make my joke about how I can't vote over here and "you know how Americans feel about taxation without representation!" and they don't know what the hell I'm talking about.

eddie wrote:

Tommy Monk wrote:


Nobody voted for the mass immigration of 3rd world scum bags.

Who are these “3rd world scumbags” you refer to?
Please explain.

Explain please?

Here's an example...


https://www.expressandstar.com/news/2021/05/06/rapist-convicted-following-string-of-attacks/


Here are a load more examples...


29 Men Charged in Connection with Child Sexual Exploitation in Calderdale

Asad Ali, 37, of Brighouse, is charged with two counts of rape.
Ajmal Aziz, 39 of Halifax, is charged with three counts of rape and attempted rape.
Mohammed Jangier, 44, of Halifax, is charged with rape.
Mohammed Asif, 36, of Halifax, is charged with two counts of rape.
Harris Ahmed Butt, 37, of Halifax, is charged with two counts of rape and two counts of indecent assault.
Taukeer Butt, 36, of Halifax, is charged with three counts of rape.
Muitasim Khan, 40, of Halifax, is charged with rape.
Mohammed Hamza, 47, of Halifax, is charged with rape.
Mohsin Mir, 40, of Halifax, is charged with three counts of rape.
Javid Mir, 38, of Halifax, is charged with rape.
Haroon Saddique, 37, of Bradford, is charged with two counts of rape.
Zahir Iqbal, 41, of Halifax, is charged with two counts of rape.
Sarfraz Rabnawaz, 35, of Bradford, is charged with two counts of rape.
Wajid Addalat, 43, of Halifax, is charged with rape.
Sajid Addalat, 45, of Halifax, is charged with two counts of rape.
Nazim Hussain, 43, of Bradford, is charged with conspiracy to rape.
Nadeem Saddiqque, 43, of Sheffield, is charged with rape.
Saquab Hussain, 43, of Halifax, is charged with two counts of rape.
Sadakat Ali, 48, of Bradford, is charged with rape.
Ziarab Mohammed, 48, of Halifax, is charged with two counts of rape.
Imran Raja Yasin, 41, of Halifax, is charged with two counts of rape.
Zulfiqar Ali, 40, of Bradford, is charged with two counts of rape.
Malik Abid Qadeer, 64, of Halifax, is charged with five counts of rape.
Kamran Amin, 45, of Halifax, is charged with two counts of rape.
Mohammed Akhtar, 51, of Halifax, is charged with two counts of rape.
Ali Zulfiqar, 38, of Halifax, is charged with two counts of rape.
Shafiq Ali Rafiq, 40, of Dewsbury, is charged with two counts of rape.
Amir Shaban, 45, of Halifax, is charged with rape.
Sakeb Nazir, 36, of Halifax, is charged with two counts of rape.


https://www.westyorkshire.police.uk/news-appeals/29-men-charged-connection-child-sexual-exploitation-calderdale


That last article was from 5 days ago... Another load of Pakistani Muslim child rapists ..

And interestingly... All most likely to be labour voters too...

So ALL Pakistani men are rapists, monsters and 3rd world scum?

I know one man who isn’t. He’s one of my bosses and he’s a loving, loyal, family man.

I bet I could compile a much longer list of white English rapists, if I wasted my time on stupid shit like that.

Ben Reilly wrote:I bet I could compile a much longer list of white English rapists, if I wasted my time on stupid shit like that.

What Tommy did was called generalising. I’m not a fan.

eddie wrote:

Ben Reilly wrote:I bet I could compile a much longer list of white English rapists, if I wasted my time on stupid shit like that.

What Tommy did was called generalising. I’m not a fan.

Nor am I, I remember a great point Veya made one time about the mistake some people make in thinking that the good people of the world all look one way and the bad people all look a different way.

The good and bad people are evenly distributed among every group on the planet.

Ben Reilly wrote:I bet I could compile a much longer list of white English rapists, if I wasted my time on stupid shit like that.

Could you compile a list of white English rapists that worked together as a "club"?

I think the issue here, is the organized criminal element acting right under the nose of the cops.

Generalizing is what we do in polls and statistics all the time. For that matter, it's what we do when we vote. We generalize all the time, and think nothing of it.

Like everything else, when a generalization is good, it's very, very good, and when it's bad, it's horrid. When the generalization is on the mark, we like it. But then, when it's off the mark, or more to the point, when it criticizes someone or something we like, we dislike it.

Original Quill wrote:Generalizing is what we do in polls and statistics all the time.  For that matter, it's what we do when we vote.  We generalize all the time, and think nothing of it.

Like everything else, when a generalization is good, it's very, very good, and when it's bad, it's horrid.  When the generalization is on the mark, we like it.  But then, when it's off the mark, or more to the point, when it criticizes someone or something we like, we dislike it.

I think generalising when one is making a bold statement is always horrid. I don’t like it.

Maddog wrote:

Ben Reilly wrote:I bet I could compile a much longer list of white English rapists, if I wasted my time on stupid shit like that.

Could you compile a list of white English rapists that worked together as a "club"?

I think the issue here, is the organized criminal element acting right under the nose of the cops.

And that, of course, was the difference...organised, systematic grooming, abuse and rape of often very young, socially vulnerable and predominantly white girls was something that was virtually unknown in this country until the latter half of the 20th century and the demographic shift in the make up of the population as a result of post war immigration.

And as if that were not enough, both the police and local authorities suppressed, or at least attempted to suppress, the true extent of the problem “in the interests of social cohesion.” That it was happening was, however, common knowledge locally and it was inevitable that the authorities were forced to carry out serious investigations and the police and CPS had no alternative but to proceed with criminal charges and prosecutions.

I’m afraid that the case list of convictions speaks for itself, though of course any reference to it and the names of those convicted still attracts accusations of racism from some quarters.

As a point of interest, the South Yorkshire town of Rotherham was identified as one of the worst locations for organised abuse. I happen to know quite a lot about the place...I lived there, and several of my family still do.

Fred Moletrousers wrote:

Maddog wrote:

Could you compile a list of white English rapists that worked together as a "club"?

I think the issue here, is the organized criminal element acting right under the nose of the cops.

And that, of course, was the difference...organised, systematic grooming, abuse and rape of often very young, socially vulnerable and predominantly white girls was something that was virtually unknown in this country until the latter half of the 20th century and the demographic shift in the make up of the population as a result of post war immigration.

And as if that were not enough, both the police and local authorities suppressed, or at least attempted to suppress, the true extent of the problem “in the interests of social cohesion.”  That it was happening was, however, common knowledge locally and it was inevitable that the authorities were forced to carry out serious investigations and the police and CPS had no alternative but to proceed with criminal charges and prosecutions.

I’m afraid that the case list of convictions speaks for itself, though of course any reference to it and the names of those convicted still attracts accusations of racism from some quarters.

As a point of interest, the South Yorkshire town of Rotherham was identified as one of the worst locations for organised abuse. I happen to know quite a lot about the place...I lived there, and several of my family still do.

My issue isn't with immigration. My issue is with double standards. Don't treat people differently because they belong to what some like to call a marginalized group. All that does is make their victims a marginalized group and creates less social cohesion as everyone watching knows what a steaming pile of shit they are seeing, and resent the hell out of it.

Maddog wrote:

Fred Moletrousers wrote:

And that, of course, was the difference...organised, systematic grooming, abuse and rape of often very young, socially vulnerable and predominantly white girls was something that was virtually unknown in this country until the latter half of the 20th century and the demographic shift in the make up of the population as a result of post war immigration.

And as if that were not enough, both the police and local authorities suppressed, or at least attempted to suppress, the true extent of the problem “in the interests of social cohesion.”  That it was happening was, however, common knowledge locally and it was inevitable that the authorities were forced to carry out serious investigations and the police and CPS had no alternative but to proceed with criminal charges and prosecutions.

I’m afraid that the case list of convictions speaks for itself, though of course any reference to it and the names of those convicted still attracts accusations of racism from some quarters.

As a point of interest, the South Yorkshire town of Rotherham was identified as one of the worst locations for organised abuse. I happen to know quite a lot about the place...I lived there, and several of my family still do.

My issue isn't with immigration. My issue is with double standards. Don't treat people differently because they belong to what some like to call a marginalized group. All that does is make their victims a marginalized group and creates less social cohesion as everyone watching knows what a steaming pile of shit they are seeing, and resent the hell out of it.  

My issue isn’t about immigration either;  it is about tradition and culture. A religion-based view that white girls, mostly vulnerable and some still children, should be regarded by one small sector of society as being unworthy of the same sort of respect, concern and protection afforded to their own daughters, grand daughters and nieces is, quite frankly, racist and obscene.

And it is utterly disgraceful and indefensible that it was tolerated for so long by the police and local authorities who were - not to put too fine a point on it - shit scared that the inevitable playing of the race card would lead to accusations directed at individual officers and officials and, in all probability, demonstrations, riots and vigilante groups seeking revenge not only on the abusers but everyone associated with them by race, creed or colour.

Well said, Fred.

There are loads of reasons to be against mass immigration.


Main one being... Nobody has ever voted in favour of it!!!


And vast majority of the population are against it!!!

Fred Moletrousers wrote:

Maddog wrote:

My issue isn't with immigration. My issue is with double standards. Don't treat people differently because they belong to what some like to call a marginalized group. All that does is make their victims a marginalized group and creates less social cohesion as everyone watching knows what a steaming pile of shit they are seeing, and resent the hell out of it.  

My issue isn’t about immigration either;  it is about tradition and culture. A religion-based view that white girls, mostly vulnerable and some still children, should be regarded by one small sector of society as being unworthy of the same sort of respect, concern and protection afforded to their own daughters, grand daughters and nieces is, quite frankly, racist and obscene.

And it is utterly disgraceful and indefensible that it was tolerated for so long by the police and local authorities who were - not to put too fine a point on it - shit scared that the inevitable playing of the race card would lead to accusations directed at individual officers and officials and, in all probability, demonstrations, riots and vigilante groups seeking revenge not only on the abusers but everyone associated with them by race, creed or colour.

Yup, and their enablers are as guilty as they are.

Who knows what is in these folks hearts. But if you don't have folks covering for them, they probably wont even try engaging in this horrific shit.

Tommy Monk wrote:


There are loads of reasons to be against mass immigration.


Main one being... Nobody has ever voted in favour of it!!!


And vast majority of the population are against it!!!

Is it all foreigners you’re against or only people from certain countries?

The natural way of humanity from forever ago has been to move around the world freely, almost restlessly at times.

This notion that we must all stick to the spot on which we were born is depressing, unnatural and sick.

Ben Reilly wrote:The natural way of humanity from forever ago has been to move around the world freely, almost restlessly at times.

This notion that we must all stick to the spot on which we were born is depressing, unnatural and sick.

It was never freely. Usually man had tribes and defended itself from other tribes who were just taking a look around some new hunting grounds.

Now we have progressed from that, but we can still expect certain behavior if your want to join our tribe.

eddie wrote:

Tommy Monk wrote:


There are loads of reasons to be against mass immigration.


Main one being... Nobody has ever voted in favour of it!!!


And vast majority of the population are against it!!!

Is it all foreigners you’re against or only people from certain countries?

No and no.

Labour get an all time drubbing in the Chesham and Amersham by election!!!



The worst result in a by election in the party's history with a total of only 622 votes!!!

eddie wrote:

Original Quill wrote:Generalizing is what we do in polls and statistics all the time.  For that matter, it's what we do when we vote.  We generalize all the time, and think nothing of it.

Like everything else, when a generalization is good, it's very, very good, and when it's bad, it's horrid.  When the generalization is on the mark, we like it.  But then, when it's off the mark, or more to the point, when it criticizes someone or something we like, we dislike it.

I think generalising when one is making a bold statement is always horrid. I don’t like it.

Your issue is with the "bold statement", not with the process of generalising.

Original Quill wrote:

eddie wrote:

Original Quill wrote:Generalizing is what we do in polls and statistics all the time.  For that matter, it's what we do when we vote.  We generalize all the time, and think nothing of it.

Like everything else, when a generalization is good, it's very, very good, and when it's bad, it's horrid.  When the generalization is on the mark, we like it.  But then, when it's off the mark, or more to the point, when it criticizes someone or something we like, we dislike it.

I think generalising when one is making a bold statement is always horrid. I don’t like it.

Your issue is with the "bold statement", not with the process of generalising.

No....I don’t mind bold statements at all, as long as they’re not generalising.

eddie wrote:

Original Quill wrote:

Your issue is with the "bold statement", not with the process of generalising.

No....I don’t mind bold statements at all, as long as they’re not generalising.

If the proof is there, why do you mind?  Generalising is merely the plural tense: he is Hungarian; they are Hungarian.  It's the content of the statement that matters.

Well obviously it’s the content Quill.

Tommy Monk wrote:

eddie wrote:

Tommy Monk wrote:


There are loads of reasons to be against mass immigration.


Main one being... Nobody has ever voted in favour of it!!!


And vast majority of the population are against it!!!

Is it all foreigners you’re against or only people from certain countries?

No and no.

Majority opinion isn't a very good reason for being for or against something, to be fair. Plenty of people like Coors Lite beer, doesn't mean I should consider not calling it anything other than carbonated gnat piss.

I've said here before, I've had plenty of white English people tell me that they're against immigration, apparently forgetting or ignoring the fact that I'm an immigrant.

Why get Coors Lite-piss when Mexican beer is so close by. The Hapsburgs, when they ruled Mexico (late 1860's), taught the Mexicans how to brew beer. Next to Belgium beers, it's the best.

Tecate with a slice of lime...a dream.