woman is knocked flat with a sucker punch after spitting at men in Cleethorpes

WhoseYourWolfie wrote:

In this day and age,  spitting can spread Hep' A, B or C, HiV, flu' and cold viruses, and several other communicable diseases...

Anybody foolish enough to spit at any group, especially after a drunken night out, can expect to eventually get their 'come_uppance'..

Irrespective of their gender, sexual orientation or other proclivities.

Vintage wrote:As already been said, a sucker punch is cowardly and dangerous.
I am not excusing her behaviour, she should have been arrested but I doubt we have enough police on the streets for that. Then the same course as Quill explained should happen, then again we don't haven't got space in clinics or prison hospitals either.

veya_victaous wrote:the dude that punched her was not even in the direction she spat.

that's a coward's punch 100% and flips my view at who is a fault

she didn't even look like she spat on them 
just in their direction as she was about to go back in.

He deserves to have his Head stomped for Cowardice If he threw a punch like that a man, so it goes double for such Cowardice towards a woman

veya wrote:He deserves to have his Head stomped for Cowardice If he threw a punch like that a man, so it goes double for such Cowardice towards a woman

Original Quill wrote:

veya wrote:He deserves to have his Head stomped for Cowardice If he threw a punch like that a man, so it goes double for such Cowardice towards a woman

Meh...legally, it's just self-defense once the affray has started.

Syl wrote:

Original Quill wrote:

Meh...legally, it's just self-defense once the affray has started.

Self defence from what?

Original Quill wrote:

Syl wrote:

Self defence from what?

From the affray.

Original Quill wrote:

veya wrote:He deserves to have his Head stomped for Cowardice If he threw a punch like that a man, so it goes double for such Cowardice towards a woman

Meh...legally, it's just self-defense once the affray has started.

veya_victaous wrote:

Original Quill wrote:

Meh...legally, it's just self-defense once the affray has started.

LoL not is Aussie Pubs  

and watch the Video he has ZERO case of claiming self defense she never even looked in his direction 
the first time she turned her head While she was walking away and opening a door He came forward and Socked her from the side 

Like I said If I was at the Pub and Saw A Coward do that to another Man, he be getting bashed for it. 
after a dog shot on a woman, he is fair game for a gang bashing.

WhoseYourWolfie wrote:

A "sucker punch" (also called a "king hit" in Oz and parts of Britain..),  is undoubtedly the mark of a coward...

Hitting someone either from behind, or blindsiding them,  amounts to cowardice pure and simple  --  and is usually the sign of someone who doesn't actually want a fight --  but is simply out to bash somebody, often just whoever's closest..

Like veya said, if someone did that in pubs down here, often they might get clobbered in turn.

I certainly wouldn't defend anybody resorting to "king hits" in situations like this --  there were a couple of 'bully boy' thugs at my high school who were famous for that kind of behaviour..

Original Quill wrote:

WhoseYourWolfie wrote:

A "sucker punch" (also called a "king hit" in Oz and parts of Britain..),  is undoubtedly the mark of a coward...

Hitting someone either from behind, or blindsiding them,  amounts to cowardice pure and simple  --  and is usually the sign of someone who doesn't actually want a fight --  but is simply out to bash somebody, often just whoever's closest..

Like veya said, if someone did that in pubs down here, often they might get clobbered in turn.

I certainly wouldn't defend anybody resorting to "king hits" in situations like this --  there were a couple of 'bully boy' thugs at my high school who were famous for that kind of behaviour..

The guy certainly wasn't a gentleman, that's for sure.  But today, spitting is an assault.  So the affray started with her.

I'm just saying that his retaliation would be considering a return punch...which, amid the affray, would be considered punching back, or self defense.

Original Quill wrote:I don't know...the video clip won't activate for me, so all I have is the still picture and what the written article says.  If she didn't spit, then she didn't throw the first punch.  In that case, the guy started the affray.

Lord Foul wrote:If that man who punched this woman had been one of my sons....he wouldnt be walking for a month.....

what kind of "man" acts in such a cowardly way towards a woman (or for that matter anyone less able to defend themselves) even IF she was the one who instigated hostilities???

totally without either principles OR honour....

No REAL man would hit a woman except in the extremes of self defence, and then only as little as necessary to prevent harm to himself......