Home
Gallery
Search
Register
Log in
About Us & RulesShould We Be Worried We’re Heading for Civil War 2.0?
5 posters
Page 2 of 2
Page 2 of 2 • 
1, 2
Should We Be Worried We’re Heading for Civil War 2.0?
by Guest Wed Aug 22, 2018 8:06 pm
First topic message reminder :
Richard F. Miller’s books include Harvard's Civil War: A History of the Twentieth Massachusetts Volunteer Infantry and States At War, Volumes 1-6, (UPNE, 2013-2018).
Few of these forecasters see a repeat of our last civil war. No attacks on a Fort Sumter followed by militia mobilization and hot war between rival governments. Most writers wisely modify Civil War 2.0 with adjectives such as “soft” or “cold” or other words short of “lethal.” But most articles do share a gist: The differences between so-called “Red” and “Blue” America are now irreconcilable, traditional political remedies that once peaceably managed conflict are irretrievably broken, and thus, a separation of some sort is, or will soon, be necessary. And if necessity can be made a virtue, it will be somehow peacefully managed.
Before exploring the likelihood of civil war, forgive a hedge. Historians should be the last to dismiss these kinds of literary trends. Fin de siècle Europe saw the publication of many dystopian novels envisioning the monstrous war that finally arrived in 1914. And if the events foretold in films such as Fail Safe and Seven Days in Mayor The Day After television series did not come to pass, they nonetheless offer a window on contemporary mindsets. Besides, America was founded in revolution and reformed by civil war. As Saul Bellow once observed through a character, “Nothing is so rum that it can’t be true.” Or, I would add, as might become true.
But is a civil war, soft, hard, cold or hot, in our cards? Color me skeptical. As a Civil war historian and a sometime journalist, I covered some tragically real insurgencies and counterinsurgencies in Iraq and Afghanistan. They weren’t fought on Twitter or websites. Usually, they show up in Taliban night letters quickly followed by assassinations, or in market place IEDs that leave scattered body parts of innocent civilians. And despite our political differences, few Americans have an appetite for that kind of domestic conflict. Lefties and Righties still enjoy going to the mall. So I’ll default to a bumper sticker of my youth: “What if they gave a war and nobody came?” And at least for now, few Americans would come to a violent civil war. A car with Massachusetts’s plates can drive still through Texas without worrying overmuch about RPGs.
Real civil wars have a pattern. One or more consequential constituencies,
● Have grievances decades or even centuries in the making that they believe are existential; and,
● They cease believing that the current power structure offers redress of such grievances; and,
● They have the material capacity, sometimes with the help of self-interested third parties, to inflict sustained violence on opposing constituencies; and,
● They possess in sufficient mass the will and organization to inflict this violence as well as absorb the inevitable counterattacks.
I may be wrong, but there’s nothing in this list that screams, “America, 2018.”
As for a cold civil war or peaceable separation, it’s about time to expose the fraudulence of the construct on which such predictions are based: “Red” vs. “Blue” states. This meme, once convenient for summarizing presidential election returns, now corrupts many analyses of our domestic circumstance. Consider these points:
● Unlike 1860, the United States is now a highly integrated economic, social and legal polity. Class conflict has replaced sectional conflict, and little of what’s disputed—immigration, abortion, gun control—amounts to a rationale for disunion.
● But no region is actually “Blue” or “Red.” For example, in so-called “deep Blue” California, of 13,237,498 votes cast for Trump or Clinton, 33.8% voted for Trump. If you’re touting separation “because Trump,” or what you fear about his supporters, you’d better have a plan to deal with the 4,483,810 Californians who voted for Trump. The Cherokee Removal, a crime and stain on our history was the last time government enforced a mass population transfer. The alternative is secession within secession. For further reading, see West Virginia, State of.
● “Red” and “Blue” differences are much exaggerated, especially within dead tree and social media silos. A vote for Clinton wasn’t necessarily a vote to bust the Union and few of Missouri’s Trump voters envisioned expelling Illinois from the republic.
Sadly for this moment in time, social media has become an influence multiplier, whose pathways of unbounded ids are coupled with the routine portrayal of political extremism as representative. The result is a daily replay of something like Orson Welles’s famous 1938 radio hoax, “War of the Worlds,” true fake news about an alien invasion that reportedly led to panic in the streets.
The updated version is a mountain of “truthiness” about shadowy Russians, political murders, FBI plots, stolen elections, Kenyan births, and Donald J. Trump, slave to Vladimir Putin. The growing cult of Civil War, 2.0, is truthiness-as-prediction. It says more about elite anxiety, bipartisan virtue signaling, and the replacement of hard analysis by the studied ignorance “social” media. As that journalist of our moment, Michael Wolff declared with perfect sincerity, “If it rings true, it is true.”
Civil War, 2.0? Nah. I’ll stick with one of my late mother’s favorite sayings: “Always try to separate the noise from the thing that makes the noise.”
https://historynewsnetwork.org/article/169535
Richard F. Miller’s books include Harvard's Civil War: A History of the Twentieth Massachusetts Volunteer Infantry and States At War, Volumes 1-6, (UPNE, 2013-2018).
Attack against Fort Sumter
A new arena in our burgeoning political circus has opened in the form of short-take political commentary: American Civil War, 2.0. Not restricted to 4chan, alt-left or alt-right, it grows instead from the fever swamps of what was once called the respectable middle. Examples of these predictions can be found here, here and here. And one knows it’s “a thing” when Twitter features a parody hash tag, #SecondCivilWar.Few of these forecasters see a repeat of our last civil war. No attacks on a Fort Sumter followed by militia mobilization and hot war between rival governments. Most writers wisely modify Civil War 2.0 with adjectives such as “soft” or “cold” or other words short of “lethal.” But most articles do share a gist: The differences between so-called “Red” and “Blue” America are now irreconcilable, traditional political remedies that once peaceably managed conflict are irretrievably broken, and thus, a separation of some sort is, or will soon, be necessary. And if necessity can be made a virtue, it will be somehow peacefully managed.
Before exploring the likelihood of civil war, forgive a hedge. Historians should be the last to dismiss these kinds of literary trends. Fin de siècle Europe saw the publication of many dystopian novels envisioning the monstrous war that finally arrived in 1914. And if the events foretold in films such as Fail Safe and Seven Days in Mayor The Day After television series did not come to pass, they nonetheless offer a window on contemporary mindsets. Besides, America was founded in revolution and reformed by civil war. As Saul Bellow once observed through a character, “Nothing is so rum that it can’t be true.” Or, I would add, as might become true.
But is a civil war, soft, hard, cold or hot, in our cards? Color me skeptical. As a Civil war historian and a sometime journalist, I covered some tragically real insurgencies and counterinsurgencies in Iraq and Afghanistan. They weren’t fought on Twitter or websites. Usually, they show up in Taliban night letters quickly followed by assassinations, or in market place IEDs that leave scattered body parts of innocent civilians. And despite our political differences, few Americans have an appetite for that kind of domestic conflict. Lefties and Righties still enjoy going to the mall. So I’ll default to a bumper sticker of my youth: “What if they gave a war and nobody came?” And at least for now, few Americans would come to a violent civil war. A car with Massachusetts’s plates can drive still through Texas without worrying overmuch about RPGs.
Real civil wars have a pattern. One or more consequential constituencies,
● Have grievances decades or even centuries in the making that they believe are existential; and,
● They cease believing that the current power structure offers redress of such grievances; and,
● They have the material capacity, sometimes with the help of self-interested third parties, to inflict sustained violence on opposing constituencies; and,
● They possess in sufficient mass the will and organization to inflict this violence as well as absorb the inevitable counterattacks.
I may be wrong, but there’s nothing in this list that screams, “America, 2018.”
As for a cold civil war or peaceable separation, it’s about time to expose the fraudulence of the construct on which such predictions are based: “Red” vs. “Blue” states. This meme, once convenient for summarizing presidential election returns, now corrupts many analyses of our domestic circumstance. Consider these points:
● Unlike 1860, the United States is now a highly integrated economic, social and legal polity. Class conflict has replaced sectional conflict, and little of what’s disputed—immigration, abortion, gun control—amounts to a rationale for disunion.
● But no region is actually “Blue” or “Red.” For example, in so-called “deep Blue” California, of 13,237,498 votes cast for Trump or Clinton, 33.8% voted for Trump. If you’re touting separation “because Trump,” or what you fear about his supporters, you’d better have a plan to deal with the 4,483,810 Californians who voted for Trump. The Cherokee Removal, a crime and stain on our history was the last time government enforced a mass population transfer. The alternative is secession within secession. For further reading, see West Virginia, State of.
● “Red” and “Blue” differences are much exaggerated, especially within dead tree and social media silos. A vote for Clinton wasn’t necessarily a vote to bust the Union and few of Missouri’s Trump voters envisioned expelling Illinois from the republic.
Sadly for this moment in time, social media has become an influence multiplier, whose pathways of unbounded ids are coupled with the routine portrayal of political extremism as representative. The result is a daily replay of something like Orson Welles’s famous 1938 radio hoax, “War of the Worlds,” true fake news about an alien invasion that reportedly led to panic in the streets.
The updated version is a mountain of “truthiness” about shadowy Russians, political murders, FBI plots, stolen elections, Kenyan births, and Donald J. Trump, slave to Vladimir Putin. The growing cult of Civil War, 2.0, is truthiness-as-prediction. It says more about elite anxiety, bipartisan virtue signaling, and the replacement of hard analysis by the studied ignorance “social” media. As that journalist of our moment, Michael Wolff declared with perfect sincerity, “If it rings true, it is true.”
Civil War, 2.0? Nah. I’ll stick with one of my late mother’s favorite sayings: “Always try to separate the noise from the thing that makes the noise.”
https://historynewsnetwork.org/article/169535
Guest- Guest
Re: Should We Be Worried We’re Heading for Civil War 2.0?
by Original Quill Sat Aug 25, 2018 3:13 am
eddie wrote:Original Quill wrote:
You are also avoiding calling people wrong, where they should be probably be jailed. I'm way beyond being fair to criminals. Southerners are white supremacists. I say remove them from our territory, and let them back in if they pass muster.
That means no white supremacists, no KKK, no Neo-Nazis...Get 'em the fuck outta here, alright? Stop with the pussyfooting.
“Southerners are white supremacists.”
All of them?
Can you be clearer when you use your brush full of tar?
OK, most of them. How's that?
I've already said the non-racists can move to California. The rest will want to stay were they are. It's a move made in Heaven.
Original Quill- Forum Detective ????♀️
- Posts : 37540
Join date : 2013-12-19
Age : 59
Location : Northern California
Re: Should We Be Worried We’re Heading for Civil War 2.0?
by eddie Sat Aug 25, 2018 3:16 am
Original Quill wrote:eddie wrote:Original Quill wrote:
You are also avoiding calling people wrong, where they should be probably be jailed. I'm way beyond being fair to criminals. Southerners are white supremacists. I say remove them from our territory, and let them back in if they pass muster.
That means no white supremacists, no KKK, no Neo-Nazis...Get 'em the fuck outta here, alright? Stop with the pussyfooting.
“Southerners are white supremacists.”
All of them?
Can you be clearer when you use your brush full of tar?
OK, most of them. How's that?
I've already said the non-racists can move to California. The rest will want to stay were they are. It's a move made in Heaven.
“Most of them”
I see. So your brush only tars most, not all. It’s a wide sweeping brush...made up of opinions of other people that you read online.
I see.
eddie- King of Beards. Keeper of the Whip. Top Chef. BEES!!!!!! Mushroom muncher. Spider aficionado!
- Posts : 43129
Join date : 2013-07-28
Age : 24
Location : England
Re: Should We Be Worried We’re Heading for Civil War 2.0?
by Guest Sat Aug 25, 2018 3:16 am
Why is anyone bothering?
Quill has proven he is emphatially xenophobic and clearly no better than the Far right
He wants Californian Nationalism, that discriminates against people based on beliefs
Quill has proven he is emphatially xenophobic and clearly no better than the Far right
He wants Californian Nationalism, that discriminates against people based on beliefs
Guest- Guest
Re: Should We Be Worried We’re Heading for Civil War 2.0?
by Original Quill Sat Aug 25, 2018 3:45 am
eddie wrote:I see. So your brush only tars most, not all. It’s a wide sweeping brush...
It's very much like the criminal justice system, which I hold dear. The guilty go down, the rest need not be concerned.
White supremacists openly admit who they are. You saw Charlottesville...they are not hiding behind some online persona. If you say, racists take one step forward, they will do it and you will know in a heartthrob.
The fact is, they don't want to live with snowflake Californians. So, they are not being deprived of anything of value. It's a fair shake all around.
Now, the fact that California wealth pays for Georgia benefits, they will miss. But tough titty said the kitty...
Last edited by Original Quill on Sat Aug 25, 2018 3:47 am; edited 1 time in total
Original Quill- Forum Detective ????♀️
- Posts : 37540
Join date : 2013-12-19
Age : 59
Location : Northern California
Re: Should We Be Worried We’re Heading for Civil War 2.0?
by Guest Sat Aug 25, 2018 3:46 am
I think its evident that Quill is a Californian Supremacist
Guest- Guest
Re: Should We Be Worried We’re Heading for Civil War 2.0?
by Original Quill Sat Aug 25, 2018 3:49 am
Didge wrote:I think its evident that Quill is a Californian Supremacist
Hey, I like it. It's like calling me a good-guy supremacist.
Original Quill- Forum Detective ????♀️
- Posts : 37540
Join date : 2013-12-19
Age : 59
Location : Northern California
Re: Should We Be Worried We’re Heading for Civil War 2.0?
by eddie Sat Aug 25, 2018 3:50 am
He discriminates people based solely on colour, ie white.
I’m calling him on it. Even if no one else does.
I’m calling him on it. Even if no one else does.
eddie- King of Beards. Keeper of the Whip. Top Chef. BEES!!!!!! Mushroom muncher. Spider aficionado!
- Posts : 43129
Join date : 2013-07-28
Age : 24
Location : England
Re: Should We Be Worried We’re Heading for Civil War 2.0?
by Guest Sat Aug 25, 2018 3:51 am
eddie wrote:He discriminates people based solely on colour, ie white.
I’m calling him on it. Even if no one else does.
Indeed and beliefs also he discriminates against and that is why I think he is a Californian Supremacist
Guest- Guest
Re: Should We Be Worried We’re Heading for Civil War 2.0?
by eddie Sat Aug 25, 2018 3:55 am
Didge, this is a sole topic on which we may just be soulmates. 
eddie- King of Beards. Keeper of the Whip. Top Chef. BEES!!!!!! Mushroom muncher. Spider aficionado!
- Posts : 43129
Join date : 2013-07-28
Age : 24
Location : England
Re: Should We Be Worried We’re Heading for Civil War 2.0?
by Guest Sat Aug 25, 2018 4:00 am
eddie wrote:Didge, this is a sole topic on which we may just be soulmates.
Guest- Guest
Re: Should We Be Worried We’re Heading for Civil War 2.0?
by Original Quill Sat Aug 25, 2018 4:09 am
eddie wrote:He discriminates people based solely on colour, ie white.
I’m calling him on it. Even if no one else does.
It's not discrimination. It's meritocracy.
Original Quill- Forum Detective ????♀️
- Posts : 37540
Join date : 2013-12-19
Age : 59
Location : Northern California
Re: Should We Be Worried We’re Heading for Civil War 2.0?
by Guest Sat Aug 25, 2018 4:14 am
Original Quill wrote:eddie wrote:He discriminates people based solely on colour, ie white.
I’m calling him on it. Even if no one else does.
It's not discrimination. It's meritocracy.
No its Californian Supremacy based on prejudice and disrimination
Guest- Guest
Re: Should We Be Worried We’re Heading for Civil War 2.0?
by eddie Sat Aug 25, 2018 4:26 am
Original Quill wrote:eddie wrote:He discriminates people based solely on colour, ie white.
I’m calling him on it. Even if no one else does.
It's not discrimination. It's meritocracy.
Oh hell, talk like a human being and not like an article you once read by some geezer you once liked.
Or don’t bother. I am easily bored by waffle.
eddie- King of Beards. Keeper of the Whip. Top Chef. BEES!!!!!! Mushroom muncher. Spider aficionado!
- Posts : 43129
Join date : 2013-07-28
Age : 24
Location : England
Re: Should We Be Worried We’re Heading for Civil War 2.0?
by eddie Sat Aug 25, 2018 4:28 am
eddie wrote:Ben Mothafuckin' Reilly wrote:eddie wrote:i don’t need to. You’ve seen them and we’ve discussed them, remember?
For the sake of transparency.
http://www.newsfixboard.com/t24883p200-new-york-times-stands-by-editorial-board-hire-despite-racist-tweets?highlight=Tweets+racist#472923
And there’s more. As you know.
For the sake of transparency.... first page.
eddie- King of Beards. Keeper of the Whip. Top Chef. BEES!!!!!! Mushroom muncher. Spider aficionado!
- Posts : 43129
Join date : 2013-07-28
Age : 24
Location : England
Re: Should We Be Worried We’re Heading for Civil War 2.0?
by Original Quill Sat Aug 25, 2018 7:48 pm
eddie wrote:Original Quill wrote:
It's not discrimination. It's meritocracy.
Oh hell, talk like a human being and not like an article you once read by some geezer you once liked.
Or don’t bother. I am easily bored by waffle.
Stop attacking posters, and stick to the topic! California is the good-guy in this situation. And no civil-war is necessary, once everyone--southern white-supremacists included--realize permanent division is essential for peaceful co-existence.
Original Quill- Forum Detective ????♀️
- Posts : 37540
Join date : 2013-12-19
Age : 59
Location : Northern California
Re: Should We Be Worried We’re Heading for Civil War 2.0?
by Guest Sat Aug 25, 2018 8:05 pm
Original Quill wrote:eddie wrote:
Oh hell, talk like a human being and not like an article you once read by some geezer you once liked.
Or don’t bother. I am easily bored by waffle.
Stop attacking posters, and stick to the topic! California is the good-guy in this situation. And no civil-war is necessary, once everyone--southern white-supremacists included--realize permanent division is essential for peaceful co-existence.
Copout reply
Guest- Guest
Re: Should We Be Worried We’re Heading for Civil War 2.0?
by Original Quill Sat Aug 25, 2018 8:12 pm
Original Quill wrote:eddie wrote:
Oh hell, talk like a human being and not like an article you once read by some geezer you once liked.
Or don’t bother. I am easily bored by waffle.
Stop attacking posters, and stick to the topic! California is the good-guy in this situation. And no civil-war is necessary, once everyone--southern white-supremacists included--realize permanent division is essential for peaceful co-existence.
Didge wrote:Copout reply
Xlnt reply. Quill, we are truly blessed to have such a brilliant--and may I say, handsome--poster such as you.
Last edited by Original Quill on Sat Aug 25, 2018 8:13 pm; edited 1 time in total
Original Quill- Forum Detective ????♀️
- Posts : 37540
Join date : 2013-12-19
Age : 59
Location : Northern California
Re: Should We Be Worried We’re Heading for Civil War 2.0?
by Guest Sat Aug 25, 2018 8:13 pm
Original Quill wrote:Original Quill wrote:
Stop attacking posters, and stick to the topic! California is the good-guy in this situation. And no civil-war is necessary, once everyone--southern white-supremacists included--realize permanent division is essential for peaceful co-existence.
Xlnt reply. Quill, we are truly blessed to have such a brilliant--and may I say, handsome--poster such as you.
I guess Quill is running away
Hey ho
Guest- Guest
Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
Similar topics» 3 of the 4 Great Black Leaders Between the Civil War and the Civil Rights Movement Are Well-Known. But the 4th?
» Britain is heading for another 2008 crash: here’s why
» Iranian Warships 'Heading Towards US Waters'
» Is the Left anti-Semitic? Sadly, it is heading that way
» “We are heading rapidly towards a world in which our antibiotics no longer work”
» Britain is heading for another 2008 crash: here’s why
» Iranian Warships 'Heading Towards US Waters'
» Is the Left anti-Semitic? Sadly, it is heading that way
» “We are heading rapidly towards a world in which our antibiotics no longer work”
Page 2 of 2
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
» TOTAL MADNESS Great British Railway Journeys among shows flagged by counter terror scheme ‘for encouraging far-right sympathies
» Interesting COVID figures
» HAPPY CHRISTMAS.
» The Fight Over Climate Change is Over (The Greenies Won!)
» Trump supporter murders wife, kills family dog, shoots daughter
» Quill
» Algerian Woman under investigation for torture and murder of French girl, 12, whose body was found in plastic case in Paris
» Wind turbines cool down the Earth (edited with better video link)
» Saying goodbye to our Queen.
» PHEW.
» And here's some more enrichment...
» John F Kennedy Assassination
» Where is everyone lately...?
» London violence over the weekend...
» Why should anyone believe anything that Mo Farah says...!?
» Liverpool Labour defends mayor role poll after turnout was only 3% and they say they will push ahead with the option that was least preferred!!!
» Labour leader Keir Stammer can't answer the simple question of whether a woman has a penis or not...
» More evidence of remoaners still trying to overturn Brexit... and this is a conservative MP who should be drummed out of the party and out of parliament!
» R Kelly 30 years, Ghislaine Maxwell 20 years... but here in UK...